Comments on Nuke Pro: Fukushima WAS a Nuclear Explosion, Here Is The Proof

Quality content is the main to be a focus for the ...

2017-03-18T18:36:20.976-07:00

Quality content is the main to be a focus for the users to pay a quick visit the web page, that's what this website is providing.

Also visit my blog: m88cvf

It is very probable that PuO2 melted out of the fu...

2016-12-27T09:00:02.749-08:00

It is very probable that PuO2 melted out of the fuel before significant UO2 melt since its melting point is 1000°F less. Then a reaction with molten Zr to produce ZrO2 and Pu. Then melt tgrough CRD guides and drain line to flow to below rx vessel onto concrete with water above concrete resulting in an exreactor criticality excursion steam explosion in containment lower level...

Consider this, 3 explosive sounds at R3. First the...

2016-10-15T18:43:52.560-07:00

Consider this, 3 explosive sounds at R3.
First the plutonium drops out of the vessel, stratified as you say, a blast, setting off a hydrogen blast, which penetrates deep into the reactor vessel, setting off the third biggest prompt critical, blowing tens or hundreds of tons of concrete into the air, 1000 feet higher or more.

I believe that the explosion was a steam explosion...

2016-10-15T18:35:36.166-07:00

I believe that the explosion was a steam explosion from molten plutonium which stratified in the corium mass (lower melting and dissociation from O2 temperature than UO2) and then rapidly leaked through bottom of RPV falling into water pool under RPV and going prompt critical when geometry and quantity of molten Pu metal reached condition for recritical mass

What a joke, you have presented no rebuttal at all...

2016-06-07T07:36:36.040-07:00

What a joke, you have presented no rebuttal at all. You simply play the "conspiracy card".

What is presented in the article is all facts, no opinions, no conspiracies. This is reality, not at all like the "HAARP caused earthquake, conspiracy"

This is the most conspiracy-ridden pseudo-scientif...

2016-06-06T04:58:32.236-07:00

This is the most conspiracy-ridden pseudo-scientific misinformation I've ever seen.

But everyone on here is reading this particular website because they want to read something with a predisposed tilt. I'm not going to try to change your minds.

More Pu exists than you think. Neutron capture ib ...

2015-10-25T10:51:34.974-07:00

More Pu exists than you think. Neutron capture ib natural uranium makes plutonium. You can do the math. How much natural uranium do you think exists on the planet? Oklo is the bane of the antinuke. You know Gundersen isn't a criticality expert. That was no crit. Ask hi m where were the 1e19 neutrons over a millisecond. Every battery powered hand held meter would have pegged as the criticality accident history shows.

Sadly, whether a fission reactor is operating with...

2015-07-12T06:46:59.173-07:00

Sadly, whether a fission reactor is operating with Thorium fuel pellets (Silicon Carbide clad), accelerator-driven Thorium reactor (with Bismuth spalation target) or some other type of conventional nuclear reactor using fuel rod bundles, when spatial integrity is lost within a nuclear reactor core, all assumptions regarding the spatial separation between fuel rods no longer pertains. When spatial crowding of fuel rods occurs, that is when a moderated prompt criticality can occur. Unintentional criticalities can also potentially occur in the spent-fuel-rod storage pools, for example at Fukushima, or at various plants in France, the UK and USA where vast quantities of spent nuclear fuel rods are presently being stored.

Sadly, there is no alternative but to admit that conventional fission nuclear power is inherently highly dangerous, uninsurable for accidents (borne at governmental level by tax payers) and leaves vasts amounts of dangerous waste (estimated 158000 tonnes of high-level nuclear waste presently around the World).

Thorium LFTR or other types of MSR could allow, if technologically developed, this nuclear waste to be transmuted to something safer and more benign to the environment, but there is no interest at governmental or institutional level to invest in such activities, as the World drowns in debt and the present World banking system (like a huge ponzi scheme) is progressing towards melt-down because of its lack of sustainability and inherent internal self-contradictions.

Only in a post economic meltdown scenario of the present international financial system (WallStreet et al.), when a new economic order is established that values environmental quality, will the necessary resources be devoted to actually dealing with the horrendous legacy of pollution that has been inflicted upon the Earth during the past 60 years: In Japan, 50 years of nuclear power, 500000 years of nuclear contamination (rather a Faustian bargain ?). I hope that the senior oligarchs within Bilderberg are properly aware of the situation and act wisely in future.

I dont understand the calculation arriving at 7 ki...

2015-05-02T06:22:16.199-07:00

I dont understand the calculation arriving at 7 kilotons to raise the roof. The units dont even make sense. Look, 2000 tones are 2 million kilos, it takes roughly 20 million joules to raise that 1 meter, 450 feet are 150 meters, roughly, so multiply 20 million joules by 150 meters and we end up with 3000 million joules, 3 Gigajoules. Now, one ton of tnt has an energy of around 4.2 megajoules, and only takes 0.67 tonnes, not kilotonnes but bare tonnes, to provide that kind of energy. Your are off by 4 orders of magnitude.

Turd, 5 took lethal doses, ON THE DAY of unit 3 ex...

2015-02-26T11:14:55.299-08:00

Turd, 5 took lethal doses, ON THE DAY of unit 3 explosion. Therein lies your proof.

"If it is not a conspiracy, it cannot possibl...

2015-02-26T11:13:21.376-08:00

"If it is not a conspiracy, it cannot possibly be the truth" stock 2014

http://www.live-counter.com/nuclear-power-station-...

2015-02-26T03:44:20.473-08:00

http://www.live-counter.com/nuclear-power-station-cooper/

Anyone who believes that the explosion at R3 was s...

2014-12-15T03:00:35.349-08:00

Anyone who believes that the explosion at R3 was simply hydrogen is easily fooled, and the nucleocrats like 'em that way.

Jim Stone has an agenda and an ax to grind, and al...

2014-11-11T05:41:51.165-08:00

Jim Stone has an agenda and an ax to grind, and although he does good research and has uncovered some useful things, his willingness to depart from reality to gain hits makes everything he does have to be taken with a grain of salt.

@Not Crazy, indeed the commenter above has done so...

2014-11-11T05:39:52.744-08:00

@Not Crazy, indeed the commenter above has done some calcs, and has completely missed the point. A moderated prompt criticality is a nuclear explosion, which is different than a nuclear bomb explosion which is designed for a particular effect (really big boom). His calc is "less than the smallest possible " completely ignoring the difference between a nuclear bomb and a prompt moderated criticality, the same DISINGENUOUS mistake that he makes while stating that a nuclear explosion destroy whole cities.

Sad how even those with some engineering training completely lie and miss the point to protect "their precious" technology.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNC7aMc1MP4 http:/...

2014-11-10T22:06:16.089-08:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNC7aMc1MP4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_CdCRux9bc

You've GOT to be joking, right? The building wasn't destroyed? Please watch these videos then tell us if you still think the Reactor 3 building and containment wasn't totally annihilated.

Its now the 31st October 2014, and the troll who s...

2014-10-31T02:10:23.916-07:00

Its now the 31st October 2014, and the troll who said "no pieces of fuel rods" has been proven wrong. Even main stream corporate media, who are usually the last to find out, have admitted this. NHK have also stated that the rods were blasted at least 130km away. It just goes to show: the truth always comes out in the end.

Vince, now adjust your thought experiement. Fil...

2014-10-05T09:23:37.812-07:00

Vince, now adjust your thought experiement. Fill the vessel only 20% of the way, and make the vessel pretty tall compared to overall volume.

Now do your blast. Does more than half of it fly out?

Therein lies the difference with Fukushima. We did not state that not a single bit of low lying material would be flung up in a hydrogen explosion/deflagration/detonation

if a hydrogen explosion occured it would have expl...

2014-10-02T18:42:44.786-07:00

if a hydrogen explosion occured it would have exploded from the top down as hydrogen floats. A top down explosion they claim cannot fling material up into the air.

I'm no expert but imagine this. Get a metal barrel. Fill it say 90% with water or sand. Cover the entire mouth of the barrel with paper. Place a small explosive device on top of the paper and ignite the explosive.

Dont tell me that an explosion above the water/sand will not fling material up into the air

About 350 micrograms is a "pretty sure kill&q...

2014-09-30T20:55:32.799-07:00

About 350 micrograms is a "pretty sure kill".
Some people say 1 microgram is enough to kill. Well thats true, even I microgram could start a cancer that killed, but it is not likely to.

At 350 Micrograms it is "pretty much for sure" going to kill

The above calculation is WRONG!!! First the state...

2014-08-22T08:06:32.719-07:00

The above calculation is WRONG!!! First the statement that 1 HP = some amount of TNT equivalent is NOT dimensionally correct. HP is a unit of power and TNT equivalent is a unit of energy. So you have power = energy which is WRONG. Power is the rate of energy = energy per time.

Let's do the calculation correct. Let "2000 tons" be 2000 metric tonnes = 2 million kilograms = 2.0e+06 kg

The height is 450 feet which is about 150 meters

The gravitational potential energy is mgh ( the product of mass, gravitational constant, and height )

E = mgh = (2.0e+06 kg) * ( 9.8 m/s^2 ) * ( 150 m) = 2.94e+09 (kg-m^2/s^2) = 2.94e09 Joules

A ton TNT equivalent is 4.184 gigaJoules = 4.184e+09 Joules
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TNT_equivalent )

Therefore E = 2.94e+09 Joules / ( 4.184e+09 Joules/ton TNT) = 0.7 tons TNT

Note; that's TONS, and not kilotons. The calculation above is off by a factor of 10,000

That 0.7 tons is smaller than the smallest possible nuclear explosion

Actually, this proves the explosion was NOT nuclear. Nuclear explosions destroy entire cities; the Unit 3 explosion didn't even destroy the building.

Ill say it again. Unit 3 was not a prompt moderate...

2014-07-05T09:19:12.679-07:00

Ill say it again. Unit 3 was not a prompt moderated criticality. The neutron flux from such an event would have sent many to the hospital.

Hi stock - thanks for these articles. About the be...

2014-04-08T15:59:18.332-07:00

Hi stock - thanks for these articles. About the beagle experiment - I looked at the link and it says: 'The dogs inhaled one of two sizes of monodisperse aerosols of 238PuO2 to achieve graded levels of initial lung burden (ILB). '

How much Plutonium did these dogs inhale, exactly? Again, trying to explain nuclear danger to others who won't listen.

Just as a new troll has entered ENENEWS, ExpertNuk...

2014-02-16T12:25:07.501-08:00

Just as a new troll has entered ENENEWS, ExpertNuke, a troll or trolls have also attacked this site, under the pretense of presenting "facts" but simply promoting a pro nuke stance.

I have been forced to restrict annoymous comments, if you won't stand behind your statements, you won't have a voice at MY SITE.

Apparently you haven't done your research. T...

2014-02-01T15:45:10.926-08:00

Apparently you haven't done your research. The rods in the rubble are exactly like the experimental nuclear fuels that the French have been creating.

Oh and does your average pipe have "closed ends" in 6" segments.....hmmmm, these aren't pieces of pipes that have been blown to pieces, and have nicely cut ends that also happened to "close up". Sorry dude, you are treading on pro nuke troll grounds already.

Oh wait....did you say pellets....I thought rods were only long and thin, oh you mean the outer casing and not just the fuel inside. Sorry dude, you been busted again.

Oh yeah....that's why they bulldozed the access roads to the plants with remote bulldozers, and then steel plated them...same with the parking lots and access to the control building. hmmmm.....do you think that is because the rods were too hot to pick up and they needed immediate access.....

Check out these rods...exactly the same thing as what is in the rubble. And check out the "rust paths" in the rubble. Now what is your theory on those?

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/01/fuel-rods-in-rubble.html