Comments on Nuke Pro: The Higher Responsibility of Scientific Researchers to Defend the Public Interest -- Or Hang

Your first sentence in general goes without saying...

2016-03-01T10:58:57.358-08:00

Your first sentence in general goes without saying. Your second sentence is hard to prove. The premise of your post assumes Fukushima is a public and world health disaster. It is not. At best it's a localized consequence the vast majority confined to the site boundary. There is no direct evidence Fukushima is causing anything you note.

You call shame on the wrong group.

2016-03-01T10:56:07.393-08:00

You call shame on the wrong group.

NOAA was directed by Obama to jigger the temperatu...

2016-03-01T09:17:17.921-08:00

NOAA was directed by Obama to jigger the temperature data to make things seem "more clear" at the Paris-site Climate Conference.

You call shame on the wrong group.

2016-03-01T07:14:58.147-08:00

You call shame on the wrong group.

Knowingly covering up information that results in ...

2016-02-26T19:54:48.253-08:00

Knowingly covering up information that results in the deaths or injuries to people is criminal. Some of the nuclear cult leaders have clearly lied about nuclear contamination and it's impacts upon human health. The public is waking up to the truth. Hillary willingly covered up the severity of Fukushima fallout. Obama did the same unless he can prove he was lied to by subordinates. The NRC, EPA and DOE is obviously guilty of misleading the US public regarding the severity of the Fuku fallout raining down upon US in 2011; and beyond. The people in charge of these criminal actions should be put to death. Hang them in the public square to set an example of what happens to TRAITORS WHO MURDER BABIES. THESE PEOPLE WILL BURN IN HELL.

PROOF OF THE COVER UP. FOIA DOCS SHOW IT ALL. THE TRUTH ABOUT THE FUKUSHIMA FALLOUT COVER-UP.
https://hatrickpenry.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/something-wicked-this-way-comes-the-story-of-plume-gate-the-worlds-largest-provable-cover-up-in-pdf/

"The takeaway" hilarious....shame on the...

2016-02-24T09:26:16.619-08:00

"The takeaway" hilarious....shame on the nukist shame

shame on the lying scientists, shame

I'm talking Paris COP and the great antinuke s...

2016-02-23T22:13:59.745-08:00

I'm talking Paris COP and the great antinuke shaming. Now the whole world knows.

Aiyaiyai, you don't even read, I put Paris 202...

2016-02-23T10:59:38.230-08:00

Aiyaiyai, you don't even read, I put Paris 2020....for the upcoming trials of the scientists that are found dead to rights lying, especially under conflict of interest. Jail or worse, are you ready for it?

are you chitin me?

Nuclear wasn't on trial at Paris. The takeaway...

2016-02-23T07:11:38.879-08:00

Nuclear wasn't on trial at Paris. The takeaway from Paris was that antinuclearism was the reason for increased coal. Zimmer. And increased coal put the planet in the shitter. You can connect the dots. You bet on the wrong horse.

Nuclear energy is not unacceptably risky. In fact...

2016-02-23T07:08:48.188-08:00

Nuclear energy is not unacceptably risky. In fact by the true definition of risk, it poses the least risk. Real risk analysts understand that point. Antinukes define risk by their flawed terminology.

OK I will call that playing the R&D card....&q...

2016-02-23T05:22:46.430-08:00

OK I will call that playing the R&D card...."because I am in R&D I am exempted from the Paris 2020 Nuremberg redux trials"

To not be able to understand that human greed and nuclear energy are unacceptably risky. Regardless of any individual efforts, the overall equation has got a full head of steam towards a singularity.

To equate legitimate R&D to Nuremberg is a fal...

2016-02-23T03:21:06.379-08:00

To equate legitimate R&D to Nuremberg is a false equivalency. My professional life has been in support of the Greater Good. I don't believe you realize that we,are driven by higher ideals. I could have a more lucrative career in the private sector yet am driven by a higher purpose to serve mankind in a post 911 world. Oh and engineering isn't the same as science. You really need to understand the difference. Engineering is the art of applying science under constraints. I'll leave it up to you to figure out constraints. It's not a blank check.

Oh and it's really not about nuclear more so than how the system is set up.

I still don't believe you understand that she...

2016-02-23T03:19:37.008-08:00

I still don't believe you understand that she didn't kill anyone with her action or inaction. You know Durnford is in court now because he said stuff he could not back up. As much as our views are opposite I would hate to see you go down that same road. It's not that I am siding with her. I'm not even a democrat. I just think it will be bad for you to continue making accusations you can't prove. The tsunami did the killing not low low radiation levels. Those are the facts. Take it or leave it.