tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post2690521248036314079..comments2021-08-18T04:01:38.227-07:00Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-35341338582663178162015-01-20T22:45:39.961-08:002015-01-20T22:45:39.961-08:00I couldn&#39;t find any. The paper at the agwunveiled link with references has about the same information plus everything after Table 1.Dan Pangburnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07898549182266117774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-28037697529804627332015-01-20T07:09:31.455-08:002015-01-20T07:09:31.455-08:00Dan can you provide a non pay site link to the article you reference?Stockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04516118374677265589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-78074730181443516962015-01-19T16:15:44.839-08:002015-01-19T16:15:44.839-08:00Dan, thanks for pinging in here. Your work is invaluable. it is hard to get people to open their eyes when they have been lied to for so many years.<br /><br />Facts sometimes help!<br /><br />Stockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04516118374677265589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-32887002806990056412015-01-18T16:00:40.528-08:002015-01-18T16:00:40.528-08:00The two factors that accurately explain the last 300+ years of climate change are also identified in a peer reviewed paper published in Energy and Environment, vol. 25, No. 8, 1455-1471.Dan Pangburnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07898549182266117774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-55849801771588865112015-01-15T23:32:13.008-08:002015-01-15T23:32:13.008-08:00@Dud, always classic, always obtusely to the point MahaloStockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04516118374677265589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-78184881723463238262015-01-15T20:30:04.343-08:002015-01-15T20:30:04.343-08:00Is jzf from a peer reviewed science journal?<br /><br />Unlike peer-reviewed silence, there was no profit motive involved in it&#39;s creation, in my humble opinion.<br /><br />Do note his formula, and how closely it relates with real data.<br /><br />Quote of Dan Pangburn: &quot;The physics of thermalization explains why non-condensing ghg change has no significant effect on climate.&quot;<br /><br />H20 regularly changes phase change near the triple point for protiated water. Water vapor seems a media more apt to both capture &amp; transfer kinetic energy.<br /><br />Common sense never sees peer review, and perhaps even vice-versa.Dudnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-60897367054836376752015-01-14T20:15:20.617-08:002015-01-14T20:15:20.617-08:00Why do you ask?<br /><br />Is your reply a &quot;false argument&quot; of appeal to authority?<br /><br />Why not review the data in the link provided?<br /><br />Why not review the actual temperature data? <br /><br />Let me know your determination and any further questions.Stockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04516118374677265589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-33518649337202477312015-01-14T17:23:58.280-08:002015-01-14T17:23:58.280-08:00Is this from a peer reviewed science journal?jzfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11861058020932598173noreply@blogger.com