tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post2749735378122529553..comments2021-08-18T04:01:38.227-07:00Comments on Nuke Pro: Some Counter Arguments to the Lies About New NuclearUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-34189806429966293522016-01-23T08:28:02.788-08:002016-01-23T08:28:02.788-08:00Thats a ludicrous argument. Natural radiation expo...Thats a ludicrous argument. Natural radiation exposure to radon gas is 10,000x more than nuclear. Loose Nukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14225475544660127189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-35165268060910813162016-01-23T08:26:09.775-08:002016-01-23T08:26:09.775-08:00Recycling isnt reprocessing since its insitu. Lear...Recycling isnt reprocessing since its insitu. Learn the difference. Deadly chemicals have no half life. Arsenic. More arsenic pumped in the air from burning fossil. Thats the antinuke legacy. Zimmer.Loose Nukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14225475544660127189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-90641365755464920212016-01-22T00:35:20.149-08:002016-01-22T00:35:20.149-08:00As far as "we" are concerned 300 0r 1000...As far as "we" are concerned 300 0r 1000 years is the same because for us it is forever...<br /><br />As far as radioactivity causing pollution, I'm beginning to think that perhaps Governments want radioactive pollution because it will limit population growth globally.CaptDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07050270886707234885noreply@blogger.com