Comments on Nuke Pro: Radiation in the Medical Industry Has Reached Levels Beyond Insane

LOL, at least you got some game, not much. Even ...

2016-02-24T10:10:08.662-08:00

LOL, at least you got some game, not much. Even a nukist can learn lol

Ya you keep on running in those circles, killing p...

2016-02-24T10:09:13.450-08:00

Ya you keep on running in those circles, killing people, and chasing the precious.

Ya know, Nuke, you can clean up your double posts ...

2016-02-23T10:54:45.698-08:00

Ya know, Nuke, you can clean up your double posts yourself so I don't have to. Sheesh, be polite at least

Ah yes, the old "coal lie", no we aren't pro-coal, and Germany is also reducing coal use as they eliminate nuke, and roll out solar PV.

1900 was a pure industrial age and the world popul...

2016-02-23T05:48:18.701-08:00

1900 was a pure industrial age and the world population was about 1/10 of what it is today. A lot of things came to be in the last 100 yrs.You realize air quality from burning fossil fuels including automobiles is the most likely culprit. It's not low low radiation levels. It's the air. Think about that the next time you fall for the banana in the tailpipe.

No go, the ol "must be vetted" lie. A...

2016-02-23T05:25:48.898-08:00

No go, the ol "must be vetted" lie. And of course, everyone will have to agree with the study, including the IAEA, nukists, the WHO(RE) to the IAEA. Plenty of HIGH POWER studies that leave no doubt, and theory also predicts the same.

Chronic low dose via man made nuclides is worse than occasional higher dose, even internal.

Disagree. No vetted study shows a link between low...

2016-02-23T03:30:16.311-08:00

Disagree. No vetted study shows a link between low low radiation levels and cancer. There is a difference between vetted and peer review. Vetted is a more thorough scrutiny by an entire community. Peer review is one guy.And that guy may not be independent.

Radon trapped in coal is released with each burn.

2016-02-23T03:26:35.974-08:00

Radon trapped in coal is released with each burn.

1900 was a pure industrial age and the world popul...

2016-02-23T03:25:37.825-08:00

Oh wow, using the total amount versus rate of canc...

2016-02-19T11:31:13.028-08:00

Oh wow, using the total amount versus rate of cancer false argument, my that is weak.

1900 is was 6% now its 66%, do the math, 11 times more. And skyrocketing right at 1945.

Plenty of studies showing for sure that even low level radiation causes cancers and other diseases.

Oh ya, those coal miners do just dandy in health, ...

2016-02-19T09:24:30.263-08:00

Oh ya, those coal miners do just dandy in health, lol.

2016-02-18T19:44:22.416-08:00

This comment has been removed by the author.

That's a ridiculous statement. Radiation is a ...

2016-02-18T19:43:43.929-08:00

That's a ridiculous statement. Radiation is a quanta of energy. Every isotope exists in nature. Even Pu239. There is just not enough in one concentrated location. A stray cosmic ray neutron captured in U238 in the ground will make a plutonium 239 atom in the ground. Man didn't create the nuclear structure of matter. He just builds machines that concentrate and harness the incredible amount to of energy in as little volume as possible. Power density.

I read it.Its not ready for prime time in the circ...

2016-02-18T19:40:10.436-08:00

I read it.Its not ready for prime time in the circles I run.

Our natural radioactive world poses no adverse he...

2016-02-18T19:38:31.734-08:00

Our natural radioactive world poses no adverse health issues. The human population has exponentially grown during the atomic age. Why is that? Antinukes claim more cancers yet 1) more people and 2) more confounders. People like the author think that without nuclear there would be no cancer. That's a naiive position and one that doesn't recognize any causal effect to low level radiation hasent been vetted.

Some beaches in brazil, underground coal mines.ver...

2016-02-18T19:34:36.658-08:00

Some beaches in brazil, underground coal mines.very high elevation locations..etc. it's not that hard to find 1 rem per year in nature.

The cancer rate there is lower than that in Wiscon...

2016-02-18T19:32:38.447-08:00

The cancer rate there is lower than that in Wisconsin. Too much cheese in the head I suppose.

Per usual, you didn't even read the article, s...

2016-02-18T12:05:43.642-08:00

Per usual, you didn't even read the article, shame, shame on you nukist.

Incorrect, a false baseline is one of the lies of ...

2016-02-18T12:05:16.102-08:00

Incorrect, a false baseline is one of the lies of the mukist out of the gate.

Anyone can look at the pie chart and quickly see the very small 3 slices that we can't avoid. About 1 mSV.

2nd lie, even very low mSv, say 4 msV cumulative, is shown by very powerful scientific tests to prove statistically significant increases in cancer.

Ramsar Iran, I call it the Ramsar lie. They say ...

2016-02-18T12:01:24.045-08:00

Ramsar Iran, I call it the Ramsar lie. They say everyone is super healthy, lol google it.

PS I know of no place on earth that it naturally 1...

2016-02-18T10:25:28.415-08:00

PS I know of no place on earth that it naturally 10 mSv so please inform me.

Of course we live in a radioactive world, Loose Nu...

2016-02-18T10:24:02.693-08:00

Of course we live in a radioactive world, Loose Nuke, this author is not disputing that - just pointing out two things: as the radioactivity to which a person is exposed, the numbers of damaged cells or amount of damaged molecules in cells increases thereby increases a number of different diseases, especially cancer but also auto immune, likely cardiovascular, and certainly has teratogenic and genetic effects AND the largest exposure is likely to be the result of medical procedures. No one is contesting the existence of a radioactive world - unfortunately, an increasingly radioactive world.

Naturally occurring radiation is one thing but hav...

2016-02-18T10:13:16.667-08:00

Naturally occurring radiation is one thing but having to accept man-made radiation is quite another!

Say N☢ to using Nuclear!

Don't allow Japan to continue to pollute the Pacific Ocean with ☢Waste

Background is 3-5 mSv/yr depending where you live....

2016-02-18T07:25:39.706-08:00

Background is 3-5 mSv/yr depending where you live. In certain parts of the world it's above 10. I'm wondering if you understand we live in an inherent radioactive world. You can't escape it as long as you are hwre. If you rocket off to another world it will be there too, as well as the space between. The risks of low low mSv level radiation are practically immeasurable.