Was it a bird, a plane, a missile... Pictures to c...

2020-08-12T02:08:13.223-07:00

Was it a bird, a plane, a missile...
Pictures to compare and some rad readings linked at caferadlab.
http://caferadlab.com/showthread.php?tid=3825&pid=12617#pid12617

JIM STONE OPINES AS FOLLOWS: Infrared video of mi...

2020-08-10T15:30:15.045-07:00

JIM STONE OPINES AS FOLLOWS:

Infrared video of missile strike?
There is a supposed "infrared video" of a missile strike on the port of Beirut. I did not miss this, I saw that within 10 minutes of it being posted, looked at it closely, and determined it was not an infrared video at all, it was instead a photo negative video that had been de-saturated. Could I be wrong? Well, it would have to be very coincidental to have an infrared video match the characteristics of a photo negative video. Everything was a simple invert of the existing contrast values. Technically that could happen in infrared but the chances are beyond slim. And therefore, I did not believe the video was legit. AND, One key item with this: If the missile did not show up clearly in full color video, infrared would provide ZERO advantage, it is implausible that it would be crystal clear in infrared and not show up at all in the color videos, the only color video that had anything in fact had a bird, (the one with the blue circle drawn on it).

SO, my final answer:
We got the damn nuclear fireball PLAIN AS DAY. We have other events in Syria, known to be Israel, that look the same, photographed, PLAIN AS DAY. It therefore is not wise to say any video shows a missile, because that leaves a way for the story to be pried apart. Why does it have to be a missile when it could have been a nuclear torpedo, or driven in on a truck, or planted a week before the blast, or whatever? The important thing is it was an easily provable nuke just from the fireball and blast characteristics and beyond that, nothing matters. We know Israel did that. The already proved this with less witnessed blasts in Syria. Their new toy simply has that look when it goes off.

ACD: Others have pointed out that "photoshopping" has gone beyond the sleuthing abilities of most if not all of us. No reason to believe in ANY of the images!! Some question the reality of nuclear "bombs" per se. One source (military intel serving CLAN-Destiny services, dontcha know?!) will support "micro-nukes", backing up a certain theory of HOW WTC 1 and 2 towers got dustified. Or was that "directed energy weapons" (Judith Woods and acolytes), an idea also floated for this event of mass destruction.

It is NOT the HOW, it's the WHO with which you ought to concern yourselves. The evident destruction here and many other places elsewhere -- with an increasingly likely common denominator WHO'S WHO AT THE ZOO -- do not depend on the HOW. Do not get caught up in a replay of 9-11 disinfo|misinfo|lie obfuscation.

The missile, here's another one showing missil...

2020-08-08T20:51:38.122-07:00

The missile, here's another one showing missile at 8sec and (different view) 29 sec on this one https://www.brighteon.com/d4d344fe-d9ea-4141-8a60-36bd0e17421b
Had to put the video on slowest speed and click back and forth near the 8sec and 29sec times.
Plowboy

Comments on Nuke Pro: Video Showing Missile Flying Into Beirut Harbor

Was it a bird, a plane, a missile... Pictures to c...

JIM STONE OPINES AS FOLLOWS: Infrared video of mi...

The missile, here's another one showing missil...