Comments on Nuke Pro: Lies Of Nuclear -- Nuke Propaganda Debunked, There IS NOT Any Significant Natural Radio-Isotopes Like Iodine 131 and Cesium 137

You also have neutron induced capture that results...

2015-08-31T17:12:45.024-07:00

You also have neutron induced capture that results in fission and spontaneous fission as well. Excel doesn't cut it Solve the Bateman equations.

LNUke, can you get me a download link for Scale or...

2015-08-31T17:00:32.765-07:00

LNUke, can you get me a download link for Scale or Origin Arp
It looks like a multi hour learning curve at least, but would like to give it a test drive.

I asked Oak Ridge but those people never respond.

M3 not kG

2015-08-31T16:47:04.868-07:00

M3 not kG

Loon, I used the total activity for the ocean, not...

2015-08-31T16:46:49.672-07:00

Loon, I used the total activity for the ocean, not just for 235. So it off by a factor of around 4, to account for half life and assumping fraction is same as 235.

So it 5 times
.00000000191 Bq/kG

oh wow, scary.

Its your silly site that does it. There is a lot m...

2015-08-31T16:17:16.237-07:00

Its your silly site that does it. There is a lot more 238 than 235 in the ocean. 7/1000 parts uranium is 235. The sf rate of 238 is higher too. Redo your calcs. Correctly. Use ORIGEN-ARP and scrap the Excel method. Its off by many orders

4 times? Loose Nuke...you need to repeat the sam...

2015-08-31T10:34:45.046-07:00

4 times? Loose Nuke...you need to repeat the same comment 4 times? Indeed, why don't you just take that wasted time and go add in the U238 activity?

Always waiting for something of value, never getting it from the nukists?

Your mistakes are numerous. First and most importa...

2015-08-31T05:34:08.288-07:00

Your mistakes are numerous. First and most importantly you failed to account for u238 which is much more prevalent in the ocean and has a higher sf rate than 235. You conveniently leave this out. Your calcs just reiterate the old magic trick of card forcing, steering the discussion to your ready made answer. Fools the rat farm but not this real pro.

Your mistakes are numerous. First and most importa...

2015-08-31T05:33:57.706-07:00

Your mistakes are numerous. First and most importa...

2015-08-31T05:32:26.384-07:00

Your mistakes are numerous. First and most importa...

2015-08-31T05:31:59.681-07:00

I131 is a fission product sure but not a sign of c...

2015-08-31T05:13:19.348-07:00

I131 is a fission product sure but not a sign of criticality. There is a tremendous amount of natural uranium in sea water that undergoes spontaneous fission. You left that out of your calcs.