Comments on Nuke Pro: EPA Raising Radiation Limits In Drinking Water, 100's of Times Higher. Today is Last Day to Comment

filterdrop Home Air and Water Filters Up to 70% O...

2016-08-12T22:18:17.917-07:00

filterdrop

Home Air and Water Filters Up to 70% Off Retail. Air and water filters at your door! Free shipping for all orders. You can contact any time http://www.filterdrop.com

Loose nuke should know that because there are larg...

2016-08-01T09:01:58.813-07:00

Loose nuke should know that because there are large individual differences in reaction to radiation and propensity to get cancer or other disease from radiation, that any amount of radiation is simply pre-mediatated murder, like shooting into a crowd.

The terrorists of science. However....you can never prove that it was their bullet that did it, even though you caught them with the rifle and the empty shell.

Loose Nuke has obviously never heard of boiling fr...

2016-07-31T23:10:23.658-07:00

Loose Nuke has obviously never heard of boiling frogs. He also fails to give a compelling argument for raising the limits. More radiation is never better, period... and he should know that zero does not exist in this realm.

Well your creds from UMich are good and all but th...

2016-07-30T07:46:56.203-07:00

Well your creds from UMich are good and all but they dont stack up to a PhD in nuclear engineering and science from a better engineering school. Lets not talk creds for a minute and dissect your message. Have you submitted any of your work in nuclear to a reputable journal that is held in high regard? I review articles for journals before they get published and this you post isnt ready for prime time.

When you say "do your jobs" to those in the field, do you even know what their day to day job is in fact?

Increasing rad limits 100 fold wont necessarily increase cancer risk 100 unless you agree with LNT as science not policy, and from your previous writings you dont think LNT is science. So you are sounding either illogical or contradictory.

Heres something every second grader knows:

100*zero is still zero.

So do you really think the allready ridiculously low limits the risk averse regulators impose really protect people?

In the end it just alarms them to take even more ridiculous precautions. Where do you think sunblock with SPF 300 comes from? The psychology versus science wins out.

And your UMich degrees wont help you understand why that is. You cant fix stupid as they say.

Now if you really wany to do some good, then putting risk in perspective is a start.

Then you will undestand nuclear science and tech are way low on the hazard scale.

I recently had an MRI. That gave me more risk than working where i work, and that has nasty stuff. But i know how to protect myself and im not saying use SPF 300.

Ya, we really rallied quite a bit of strong opposi...

2016-07-27T03:43:08.019-07:00

Ya, we really rallied quite a bit of strong opposition and comments. The EPA is beholden to corporate interests, we need to take them to task....remind them that they have Nuremberg level responsibility, and that we are paying their salaries.

No, this sounds like a horrible idea. 250 chest xr...

2016-07-26T14:52:41.806-07:00

No, this sounds like a horrible idea. 250 chest xray a year equivalent.