Comments on Nuke Pro: Response from Author Of "We Need Radiation" Article

Google Hanford Babies with No Brains http://nsnbc....

2015-10-06T07:09:13.485-07:00

Google Hanford Babies with No Brains
http://nsnbc.me/2014/04/24/400-spike-in-rare-birth-defects-near-leaking-hanford-nuclear-site/

4mSV it's a fact, jackass

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/01/statistical-proof-that-low-dose.html

Dont know why the double post on that one

2015-10-04T20:15:04.955-07:00

Dont know why the double post on that one

2015-10-04T20:10:56.907-07:00

Dont know why the double post on that one

How many babies born without brains are a result o...

2015-10-04T14:52:37.972-07:00

How many babies born without brains are a result of radiation? You absolutely have gone off the deep end. Your 4 mSv reference is hokum. You bought into junk science. Busby is a quack. You guys deserve each other. Just dont go crying in your beer when you find out what we already know about Fukushima.

Yeah, I intend on helping to take LNT down, and re...

2015-10-04T08:37:39.456-07:00

Yeah, I intend on helping to take LNT down, and replacing with something far more realistic, in general stricter but not always.

Thanks for showing up here Doctor Yamashita!

I take issue with your careless post. You obviou...

2015-10-04T08:35:31.286-07:00

I take issue with your careless post. You obviously do not even read the comments, just cherry pick a few phrases to take pot shots at. It should be obvious that I am no fan of LNT as being a "truth", but I accept it as a reasonably safe way to estimate reasonably safe dose.

How many babies born without brains are "adequate" to the average mother? If we have better alternatives then nuclear, then not even 1 in 100,000,000 babies without brains is "adequate".

4mSV cumulative is shown to have statistically significant increased chance of cancers.

BTW you know in the back of your mind that LNT is ...

2015-10-04T04:23:48.276-07:00

BTW you know in the back of your mind that LNT is going down. Its only a matter of time. It might not be this time around but its time is short. You realize its based on extrapolated data from A bomb survivors. The measure of safety isn't in artificial numbers to concoct numerical deaths. Its about longevity and the preservation of real life. So its been 70 years since then and what have we learned? That these survivors have lived long productive lives amidst a horrible psychological trauma. Fukushima is headed that way. Alot of it really is in the mind you know. Once people conquer their fear of radiation then its easy easy Japanesey. Pun.

Excuse me but I run MCNP regularly and im no geek ...

2015-10-04T04:08:05.580-07:00

Excuse me but I run MCNP regularly and im no geek lol. Now LENT has cost needless billions so on the one hand you scream nuclear is too expensive and on the other hand you claim its unsafe. There is a phrase we like to banter about that you really need to take to heart: "Infinite safety at infinite costs". The art and practice of engineering is about constraint and resource management.In engineering cost analysis constraints always come into play because there are not infinite resources to get the job done. In this case the job is adequate protection. The regulatory bar is "adequate". So remember when you twist and spin missives to your agenda, as an engineer yourself, how would you define "adequate". A million chickens can't be used to demonstrate your point. So there are constraints.