tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post804367102330405612..comments2021-08-18T04:01:38.227-07:00Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-51956370225083883002015-10-25T18:40:22.972-07:002015-10-25T18:40:22.972-07:00in or around august 6 1945 <br />there was no other source of ionizing radiation present <br />until<br />3 days later <br />on august 9th 1945 <br /><br />so those test subjects were tested against a very large control group<br />which was <br />most of the humans living at the time in the rest of the world <br /><br />so<br />that particular study does indeed use valid test protocol with documented data sources <br />and the conclusions are credible <br /><br />always operate in KISS format <br />do not make things that are easy to see into complex puzzles designed to confuse <br />the regular<br /> mortals loow1148https://www.blogger.com/profile/09186639689552718178noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-87648414993958749252015-10-24T11:04:42.293-07:002015-10-24T11:04:42.293-07:00You are running out of time, atomsStockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04516118374677265589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-86622194969823525072015-10-24T08:53:07.053-07:002015-10-24T08:53:07.053-07:00Its not a strong case. You are exposed to ionizing radiation just for being on this planet. This &quot; no safe exposure&quot; or &quot;any exposure is dangerous&quot; meme is without substance for low doses. Why do you think there has been much activity? Its because over half a century plus 20 yrs has occured since the first real documented exposure that can be quantified as a matter of risk determination, and people have lived. Frankly, with this scientific evidence, it doesnt surprise me that those without science would believe that dogma.Loose Nukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14225475544660127189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-66875345838421852142015-10-23T21:58:44.604-07:002015-10-23T21:58:44.604-07:00strong enough <br />and that can be applied to low dose exposure from <br />any other source as well <br /><br />having said that <br />there is at least 1 study following those exposed in Chernobyl who did not get cancer to see why they did not when those living around them did <br /><br />cognitive ability is needed for both example s <br /><br />either way <br />exposure to any ionizing radiation can never be considered a health benefit <br />under any circumstance <br /> including when it is used as an alleged treatment for cancer <br /><br />see <br />&quot; the quest for the cures &quot; <br />mike<br /> <br /><br />loow1148https://www.blogger.com/profile/09186639689552718178noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7390168029330307425.post-30165912973255426472015-10-23T21:07:21.609-07:002015-10-23T21:07:21.609-07:00Its not a strong case.Loose Nukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14225475544660127189noreply@blogger.com