Comments on Nuke Pro: Radiation in the Ocean Food Chain, An Assessment of BioMagnification

the report by Aoyma is included in the link I prov...

2015-05-23T14:32:49.286-07:00

the report by Aoyma is included in the link I provided
and so is the information on where radionuclides settle.. item #10a and b

"WHERE DOES FUKUSHIMA GO - Pacific and Atmosphere
includes why Aoyma is unreasonable and unreliable modeling
and confirms historical information that radionuclides do settle @ roughly 100 meters (328 feet)
https://www.facebook.com/notes/marushka-france/where-does-fukushima-go-uponentering-the-pacific-ocean/10151889492501649 "

Ya, spread the word! link people to here, Mahalo...

2015-01-07T19:04:16.629-08:00

Ya, spread the word! link people to here, Mahalo!

Any amd all information about how this accident af...

2015-01-07T07:40:31.869-08:00

Any amd all information about how this accident affects our planet is appreciated.

Marushka, I appreciate your commentary, but the cl...

2015-01-06T15:36:02.910-08:00

Marushka, I appreciate your commentary, but the claim of "perpetuating false information" is not just a little harsh, but kind of pisses me off.

You quote "the study", what study?!, there are lots of studies cited. I think that maybe just because I quote Woods Hole (whom I normally refer to as Woods Whore)

Also you sentence structure here makes no sense in English, which is perhaps not your native tonque, however when destroying someone else's language, it is best to keep politeness on top of your list.....

"Also false information, including as 'normal' the FAR greater radiation from post-Fukushima, again, is compliant with propaganda, not empowering people with knowledge."

And I really don't think that the average visitor to this site is going to be "thrown off" by any bullshit contained within a Woods Hole report, the sheeple don't come here much.

Thanks for the comment, but try to be more constructive and specific in the future.

IRSN: Fukushima FALLOUT AS BAD AS 1960s ATOMIC BO...

2015-01-06T14:17:20.515-08:00

IRSN:
Fukushima FALLOUT AS BAD AS 1960s ATOMIC BOMB TESTS
which was and is PROFOUNDLY HUGE AND DISASTROUS
not nearly as bad as Chernobyl... study Chernobyl and you will know what we can expect in the worldt from now on.....
The worst nuclear accident directly into a marine environment - first by fallout 12 -12 March 2011 (like the landmass around the world) and liquid directly into the Pacific (initially the worst was late March to early April 2011) and also by the spewing of hundreds of tonnes of contaminated water trying to keep the corium that's left at Fukushima Daiichi
http://www.irsn.fr/EN/publications/thematic-safety/fukushima/Pages/2-fukushima-understanding-environment.aspx

US, USSR, UK, Japan... have all suppressed actual ...

2015-01-06T14:15:54.463-08:00

US, USSR, UK, Japan... have all suppressed actual data under a cloak of 'secrecy' regarding nuclear and this situation is no different.

Nuke Professional, by not analyzing the data - information you post, you are doing more to perpetuate false information. This study is flawed, analyze it! Also false information, including as 'normal' the FAR greater radiation from post-Fukushima, again, is compliant with propaganda, not empowering people with knowledge.

The problem with WHOI is that they are building a case for explaining away radioisotopes traveling across the Pacific based on a very faulty report by Aoyma for IAEA. Very faulty. This is also happening with the buildup of false information.

WHERE DOES FUKUSHIMA GO - Pacific and Atmosphere
includes why Aoyma is unreasonable and unreliable modeling
and confirms historical information that radionuclides do settle @ roughly 100 meters (328 feet)
https://www.facebook.com/notes/marushka-france/where-does-fukushima-go-uponentering-the-pacific-ocean/10151889492501649