stock here-- I have shown how "Chitin" [pronounced Kai-Ten] absorbs radiation like a sponge, and
that radiation is one of the few things that can damage/break apart Chitin.
Phytoplankton and ZooPlankton shell is composed of Chitin. Radiation kills these small marine plants and animals, which is the basis of the ocean food chain.
See below, Plankton make clouds in the sky. No joke. Cloud help keep things cool. Was the "blob" of warm water actually caused by a radiation kill off of the Plankton and Krill. Indeed.
Hat tip to CodeShutdown for this weather find as well as the original Chitin idea
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/articles/article/clouds-of-plankton/
Each stage of this food chain does its utmost to survive, battling
both the creatures that rely on it for food, and the natural
environment. This evolutionary ‘arms race’ can lead to some truly
astonishing connections, that are far from immediately obvious. Over the
last few decades the diverse combination of satellite imaging, marine
biochemistry, atmospheric chemistry and meteorology have revealed that
phytoplankton can bend the weather to their advantage, seeding clouds to
protect themselves from harmful UV radiation.
Cloud Seeding
Pages
- Climate, Earthquake, and Vulcanism Resources
- 2018 Update On Actual Global Warming Data -- HadCRUT Data from the UK Charted
- Videos, Fukshima Blew Up in a Prompt Criticality
- Why Shut Down Nuke?
- Radiation Removal
- Rad Prep Shelter in Place Checklist
- Uranium Aerosolized Into Atmosphere
- Gundersen Email / Theories
- Largest Lies of Nuke
- Alternative Resources to the Big Tech Big Media
- Nuke Accidents 101
- Hormesis Is a Lie
- Renewable Energy PV
- Carrington Event and Space Weather Resources
- Rad Maps, Earthquakes, Nuke Bombs, High Quality Pictures
- Chernobyl Documentary 500K
- Home
- Conversions / Safety Limits
- 2020 Corona Virus Resources
- Prepper/Survival Resources And Protection from Radiation
Please share far and wide!
Search This Blog
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thats an illogical proposition. The oceans are naturally radioactive. Radioactivity drom man made activity pales in comparison. Not enough to "tip it". Lol
ReplyDeleteNow you are stealing 2 of my memes? Shows you got no game
Delete1) pales in comparison
2) tip it
I used it first. Ten years ago before 311.
DeleteI bet you think you came up with red pill too. Ask Wachova brothers for permission.
Which one? TIPP it good.
Delete$2B wasted at WIPP, how sad
not clear on why pro nukers keep relating man made radiation to naturally occurring radiation. makes them look stupid.
ReplyDeleteThey think they are fooling people. I mean if they were real, why wouldn't they present data on how K40 biomagnifies in Chitin like Cesium and Strontium do.
DeleteHere is the answer, because naturally occurring radiation DOES NOT biomagnify
Shame on the nukist
Man made, natural, its the same brand. Every isotope man makes occurs in nature. Its not a different physics. Spontaneous fission still has a double humped fission product curve. Now whose stupid? Learn.
DeleteYou dodged the question, that was chity of you.
DeleteK40 releases a 1.46 MeV gamma ray. Other isotopes release less radiation and get more negative airplay. No reason.
Deleteloose Nuke your oceanic background radiation argument is disingenuous, or you havent followed. The chitin absorbtion and bioaccumulation of synthetic fission products forms point sources of high radioactivity. The process is complex and depends on biological mineral transport factors as well as the ion-exchange mechanism of chitin. the selective absorption and bioaccumulation factors, relevant to the background k-40 argument are seen in the published data
Deleteconcentration factors for plutonium
phytoplankton 100 000 x
microzooplankton 15 000 x
Cs-137
phytoplankton 20 x
teleost fish 20 to 60 x
octopus and squid 10x
K40 ZERO percent bioaccumulation, imagine that.
Deleteloose nuke, I have read many of your posts. Your motivation seems to be an attempt to discredit and disprove anything that shows a danger in nuclear fallout. A glaring omission is that you never bring anything to the table...no studies, no references, no theories.
DeleteAnother observation; you display no concern for the environment, the health of plant and animal. Since the Fukushima disaster, there has been a rise in horrendous mortality events. For example the simultaneous reduction in anchovie and sardine is an ominous tragedy for those animals and the ones who feed on them. I dont think anyone is saying poisonous nuclear fallout is the sole cause, but to dismiss, out of hand, the effect of approximately 10,000 Hiroshima bombs is...well, stupid. If you would like to be taken more seriously, you have to improve your contribution, which so far, is conspicuously vacuous
Krill Cloud Nucleation getting some traction.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wallstreethedge.com/microbes-found-in-the-ocean-influence-the-weather/23363/