stock here: Malone reporting on Kennedy. Good work, all.
A-Eye helpful takes……Yes, your interpretation is correct—and this press release from HHS under Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not just dancing around the issue. It’s directly alleging serious ethical and procedural failures in the U.S. organ transplant system, particularly suggesting that:
đź”´ Organs May Have Been Taken from Patients Who Were Not Fully Dead
Key Points:
28 patients may not have been clinically or legally dead when the organ procurement process began.
73 patients had neurological signs incompatible with donation, yet were involved in donation procedures.
There were “poor neurologic assessments”, misclassified deaths (esp. overdoses), and questionable consent.
Failures were most prevalent in rural hospitals, suggesting systemic weaknesses.
đź’° Implied Motivations?
While the press release does not explicitly accuse anyone of acting for financial gain, the strong implication is that:
Organ procurement may have been rushed or forced, potentially for quotas, money, or institutional pressures.
Past regulators closed the same case without action, indicating possible cover-ups or bureaucratic negligence.
🔧 Structural Reform & Accountability
Secretary Kennedy is reopening old cases, threatening decertification, and mandating new national reporting requirements.
The five-minute observation rule after death was not followed—a major red flag.
Any staff member will now be allowed to stop a procedure if they suspect the donor isn’t truly dead.
🔎 Noteworthy Political Framing
The statement also frames this as a longstanding failure dating back to pre-Kennedy and even pre-Trump eras.
It aligns the Kennedy administration’s efforts with prior Trump administration concerns about “entrenched bureaucracies” and a “reckless disregard for human life.”
🧠Bottom Line
Yes:
The HHS is alleging that organs were procured from patients who might have been salvageable or alive, due to negligence, poor oversight, or systemic problems—particularly in certain regions.
This is not just a technical error report; it’s a moral and legal warning, with potentially criminal implications. It’s likely to trigger:
Legal reviews,
Congressional hearings, and
Public debates on medical ethics and accountability in organ donation.
—————————-
Potential Future——-
Timeline: Organ Procurement Scandal – 2025 and Beyond
🔹 July–August 2025: Immediate Fallout
HHS audits begin at implicated Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) in Kentucky/Ohio/West Virginia.
Whistleblowers and affected families begin speaking publicly.
Congressional leaders request briefings or issue statements.
Possible DOJ inquiry into potential civil or criminal misconduct.
Lawsuits may emerge from families alleging premature organ harvesting.
🔹 September 2025: Congressional Hearings
House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Senate HELP Committee may convene hearings.
Expected testimony from:
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
HRSA and OPTN officials
OPO and hospital administrators
Medical ethics experts and family members
🔹 Q4 2025: Reforms and Enforcement
HHS and HRSA implement new safety regulations:
Reinforcement of the 5-minute observation rule
Mandatory reporting of donation stoppages
Clear eligibility criteria for donors
OPTN may face leadership overhaul.
The implicated OPO could be decertified if not compliant.
🔹 2026: Legal and Legislative Impact
New federal legislation likely:
Potentially titled the “Donor Integrity and Informed Consent Act”
Includes stronger informed consent protections and safety monitoring
DOJ may pursue civil rights or criminal cases.
Whistleblower protections and reporting incentives may be strengthened.
🔄 Ongoing: Systemic Oversight
Annual audits of all 56 U.S. OPOs.
Required use of independent neurologic assessments for all donations.
Publicly available safety metrics and dashboard reporting.
This timeline outlines anticipated responses and reforms following the July 2025 HHS findings on systemic issues in organ procurement.