stock here: well I have to say, if you kick ass in reality you are not bragging. But I was the first person to notice this, I think early August, I published it once and it went under the radar. The second time it got more wings and I presented it as more of an evil twist, and was immediately banned from Google, after millions of views throughout the years. Now a few people have picked up with it, and are pushing it even further.
People on Twitter and YouTube are wondering where I am. I was locked out of both accounts for posting a paper presented at the recent American Heart Association meeting, and a direct quote and table from the UK government.
You can find me posting on much better platforms :
I tediously copied around 50 comments, all are anti-mandate except 2.
You can view the comments, very few at 386 is what I see.
1 sample
Essential Transit Workers have been working in hazardous conditions throughout the pandemic. Most did not have proper PPE in the beginning or protective shields or mandatory masking for passengers. Now that OSHA has officially deemed our work areas hazardous to our health we should fit the official conditions to receive hazardous duty pay for all time worked during under such conditions. Mandate Hazardous Duty Pay for all Transit Workers along with Mandatory Driver Shields for all buses, Social Distancing and continue the Mandatory Masking for riders. #HazardPayForTransitWorkers
Biden’s vaccine mandate is a threat to national security and businesses nationwide, including the company my husband and I built for 23 years. In addition to losing hundreds of thousands of our military, civil servants, firefighters, police, and nurses all within a month, our nation is facing severe upheaval and a lack of safety by losing people involved in technology. We support the brave people standing up for health freedom because we know that there are many viable and effective treatments for COVID that the government is suppressing. We know that many have had COVID and have natural immunity and this important factor is being ignored. We also know that genetic variants and preconditions make our bodies unique and react differently to drugs and injections; therefore, no one solution will work for everyone. On Nov 2, 2021, Senator Ron Johnson’s D.C hearing on vaccine mandates featured a dozen heart-wrenching testimonies from the vaccine-injured. Their stories demonstrated the clear urgency to reverse the mandate.
It is clear–mandates don’t work. They don’t work for a functioning society, and they don’t work for the health and freedom of people in America. They are scientifically unfounded because the research shows that the vaccinated can also transmit the virus, contract, and die from COVID, just like the unvaccinated. See my attached testimony for the PA Senate Majority Policy Committee Regional Hearing on Monday, November 8 for the negative impacts this mandate will have on businesses.
I am a retired CMSgt and Federal Employee. OSHA has no business mandating individual personal health requirements onto a working population. This is a clear violation of HIPAA Privacy Laws and should not even be a consideration, pandemic or not. I have been an Environmental Coordinator working with OSHA, State Departments of Environmental Quality, in a role of determining actual PPE and other control measures to ensure a “safe environment”. This never included checking personnel’s vaccine status. Being military and Federal employee, I am pro-vaccination. However, the mandate of these should be limited to those on contractual basis with the government, such as the military, and ONLY after adequate time has passed to ensure there are no delayed adverse effects of a newly introduced medical procedure, drug, or other health treatment, such as this mRNA vaccine technology which has not been through the standard rigorous (Normal) phase 3 clinical trials. There are other options out there to provide “Early Treatment” of Covid-19 in the workplace. Emphasis should be placed on personal health and conditioning one’s immune system and ensuring proper supplementation with vitamins and minerals, not mandating a “one size fits all” solution with a basically untested vaccine, (according to those with common sense).
This will promote a negative morale in the workplace and will force medical decisions on American people that choose to work at something other than a small business. This is starting to sound like it’s “all about the money” and not really about the safety. This goes against all common sense standards I was brought up on throughout my entire life and career. I recommend HIGHLY AGAINST.
See attached clinical trial phases chart
There is to be no COVID-19 Vaccination mandates. The COV19 is a hoax and an exercise in manipulation. Thousands have died due to this gene mRNA jab. You are criminally complicit if you push this on the citizens. It is a depopulation tool, and everyone knows it. WE ARE AGAINST THIS.
The purpose of OSHA “to assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources.” A mandate that requires someone to either take a medical procedure they disagree with or do weekly testing which is cost prohibitive, forcing them into the only actual option; to be discharged from their job entirely flies directly into the face of this purpose.
It has been made clear, by now, that between 25% and 30% of the population has remained unvaccinated because they have no intention of being vaccinated. How does culling 30% of the workforce an act of preserving it? I understand the intent is to provide a safe workplace but stats that unvaccinated persons are any more dangerous than vaccinated ones don’t seem to be based in truth. There may be plenty of facts in the 492 supporting documents but that does not make them empirically true.
I move on to the topic of precedent and the smallpox ruling. First, the ruling is in regard to a state mandating vaccination of its population with circumstances not congruent with these. Today we are addressing the Federal Government using its authority to strongarm corporations into usurping the rights of citizens. Second, that ruling was issued in 1902, more than 100 years after the rollout of the smallpox vaccine. The vaccines available to us at this time for prevention of Covid will still be collecting data from their clinical trial through November 2022.
How can anyone give informed consent to these vaccines if the Jury is still out? The available data from VAERS, while not scientific, does provide an overwhelming amount of data that gives reasonable people cause for caution. I’ve attached a couple of studies, but there are numerous issues and I am out of comment space.
As of November 4, 2021, 97.8% of people ages 65 years or older have received at least one dose of vaccine and 85.6% are fully vaccinated (source, CDC). This is the vulnerable population, and they seem to be well protected from the rates of vaccination. For all others, if it is true as indicated in your conclusion that vaccination effectively protects vaccinated individuals, then to mandate a vaccine on the rest of the population, against their will and with duress from threat of losing their ability to provide for themselves, is unnecessary assault.
Firing someone from their job and severing their wage and benefits will do nothing to help them, only harm them. You go on to state that fully vaccinated persons are not considered in “Grave Danger”, and so this further presents a problem If OSHA’s purpose is “to assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources.” If the vaccine keeps people from grave danger, I don’t see the need to force others to vaccinate. If it is OSHA’s position that they are saving unvaccinated from death, then why doesn’t OSHA mandate employers to discriminate hiring those who drink alcohol or engage in other behaviors that result in death?
While I appreciate the work that went into the analysis and research of this regulation, I haven’t read all of the 492 supporting documents. I am familiar with the talking points enough to have formed this opinion and what I am communicating is simple.
The Federal Government has no legal authority to use its federal extension agencies to bypass the powers of the Individual States of the United States over their people. If a corporation, State, or County wishes to impose its own rules protect the health and safety of its workers or citizens, that is one thing. The Federal Government has absolutely no authority to issue a nationwide mandate on private employers to force employees to receive experimental medical therapies under any circumstances.
It is not the place of a federal agency to dictate medical decision-making. I anticipate many more lawsuits stemming from this mandate and am interested in following each of them.
Finally, Pharmaceuticals have become a promoted consumable good rather than medicine in a relationship between a person and their doctor. The “Science” regarding COVID Disease and vaccination seem to contradict themselves compared to every other known ailment to man, which I find very concerning. For every milestone that it appears we reach, there is some new “Scientific Consensus” which turns any perceived victory into an inconsequential happening. For instance, herd immunity is no longer possible, natural Immunity is not better than vaccinated immunity, available treatments seems to be in addition to vaccinations rather than the solution to serious illness. This unusual behavior is a giant red flag. This mandate is not a tool in the toolbox, but an experiment in the making. We have not learned enough yet. This is not the smallpox vaccine in 1902. This is potentially Thalidomide in 1960.
Since the attached guidelines have been in place (June 2020), my company has had zero COVID cases. During that time, my workers have been in over 300 residences and business in NH and ME. Some of my staff are fully vaccinated, others are not. Given over a year’s experience, mandating vaccination and/or testing of my 20 employees is overkill and overregulation. It makes absolutely no sense
COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard does not align with the current administration and CDC guidance. Currently the administration and CDC recommend face masks and vaccinations in order to protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated. This rule implies that if a worker is vaccinated they would not have to wear a mask nor be tested for COVID-19 weekly. The CDC as well as medical studies are conclusive that a fully vaccinated person can contract and infect another person whether vaccinated or not. This rule, in order to be, in fact, to protect works from grave danger should mandate that ALL employees wear a mask AND be tested weekly to reduce the spread of this virus.
Although this rule will undoubtedly be challenged in the Supreme Court and ruled to be in violation of the United States Constitution, if safety of worker is the intent, then the current rule does not meet the basic spread of infectious disease requirement.
This is unconstitutional and tyrannical! The vaccine does not stop people from catching or spreading COVID. It does however cause long term damage in many cases and sometimes death. If you look at VAERS you will see all the reported issues from this “Safe” Vaccine. I personally know 2 family members who were vaccinated and still caught COVID. I also just attended the funeral of a family friend who was fully vaccinated yet died from a heart attack AND was positive for COVID. He never had any heart issues prior. Also the numbers are very inflated, i had a family member pass last year who was given 2 years to live due to cirrhosis of the liver. He was 2 and a half years into that diagnosis when he was hospitalized, covid tested 2 times and both were negative. He then was transferred to a rehab facility where he passed 4 days later. His death certificate stated he died of COVID and had it for at least a week. Obviously falsified information in order to obtain additional COVID funding. Beyond all that, this “mandate” does not take into account people who are being told not to get the shot by their doctor. I personally have a disease that causes clogged arteries and, due to concerns of blood clots from the vaccine, i have been advised not to get it. IN addition, the long term studies of effects from these shots are NOT done and NOONE knows that they may be. Beyond all this, people will NOT comply. People will get fired. The economy will suffer greatly. There will be shortages. Utility outages with long wait times to fix. Sometimes I think this is what those in power want but I hope im wrong. This is NOT the way to go.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1GzaHd7T9fqh/
Re: Mandating Covid Vaccinations/Proticol for Employers with less than 100 employees. I am small essential business owner with a staff of mostly truck drivers that deliver fuel and propane to commercial, public utilities, trucking companies, agriculture, and homeowners sites. My drivers come in the office in the morning to drop off the previous day’s paperwork and pick up any other orders for the current day. During the day, other orders are given to the drivers on a call in basis. Contact is very minimal and they have their own area to come too. Office staff have their own cubicles or offices so distancing can be maintained. We have not closed our business a single day because of Covid. Employees are encourage to stay home or out of the office if they are ill. I see no purpose in mandating a vaccine in our case as we have less than 15 employees and are able to maintain our own environment whether the employee wants to be vaccinated or not. It is not my job to police the situation as they are all adults and can make their own decisions.
The cost of weekly testing is not only the cost of the test but also the time it takes from the work day and week. We are in a state with less the 2.6% unemployment and a truck driver shortage. I can not afford to lose anyone because of a mandate.
The right to choose what goes into a persons body is a fundamental and constitutional right. There must be NO coercion. Especially when there are more than several existing therapies that cure covid.
My comment is about the OSHA Covid -19 Vaccination and Testing: Emergency Temporary Standard (Docket No. OSHA-2021-0007) –
regarding the requirement that unvaccinated individuals in the workplace be required to wear face coverings and be tested weekly for Covid 19. The Lancet study published October 29, 2021 “Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study” shows that “Vaccination reduces the risk of delta variant infection and accelerates viral clearance. Nonetheless, fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts. Host–virus interactions early in infection may shape the entire viral trajectory.” Because the workplace is very similar to household settings, and a vaccinated person can transmit the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) virus with similar viral load as an unvaccinated person to people who are vaccinated or unvaccinated and that an unvaccinated person is more likely to be hospitalized and/or die from a Covid infection, it seems this new emergency standard should be updated to make all employees in the workplace wear face coverings and get tested weekly. Because the consequences of hospitalization or death to the unvaccinated employee are higher than the vaccinated employee and that there is still a chance of hospitalization or death to the vaccinated employee, the ETS should be updated to require face coverings and weekly testing for all employees based on current science. To do not update the standard based on this new study would put all employees, regardless of vaccination status, at risk. Also, because vaccination status is not necessary to be know of individuals for this new face covering and standard to be implemented, if adopted, the new face covering and testing standard for all employees should be required of all employers, of all sizes, including all employers who would normally be required to follow the federal OSHA standards. Please see the attached Lancet study. Thanks, for you time. Thomas H. Foley
NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION, IRS FUNDING FUNDS TERRORISM, SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM, AND THE DESTRUCTION OF THE UNITED STATES WHILE MAKING BURAUCRATS WEALTHY
Sirs:
I am a small businessperson. I and my wife operate a small Wyoming business – a sole proprietorship – with less than 100 employees. We are not covered by the ETS as it is currently written, and – though it’s rare for a business to ASK to be regulated – in this case we would like to be.
Here is why. Our business – a small, rural Internet service provider – has been mandating vaccination since April 2021. We have been doing this voluntarily so as to maintain a safe and healthy workplace and to protect our employees, who must enter people’s homes in the course of their work, from contracting COVID-19, spreading the SARS-CoV-2 virus from home to home, or causing an outbreak in the office (which would shut down the business and prevent it from providing essential services that are needed during the pandemic). So far, our vaccination policy has proven effective. None of our employees has fallen ill, and to our knowledge none have been infected. Some have received “booster” shots providing even better protection against the virus, and we offered and provided paid time off to get ALL of their shots and also to recover from any side effects (which turned out to be nearly nonexistent).
Alas, for unfortunate political reasons, there has been an effort in the state of Wyoming to outlaw employer vaccine requirements. In late October and early November, the Wyoming Legislature called an extraordinary special session specifically to combat them. It failed by a single vote to pass such a law, but did pass one forbidding vaccination requirements by “public entities.”
Because our business has less than 100 employees, it is not covered by the ETS as it is currently written and might not be covered by the final standard. Thus, there would be nothing to pre-empt a state law that imposed civil or even criminal penalties upon employers with less than 100 employees for keeping our workplace and employees safe. (Several proposed bills, any of which might be revived and passed in a future session of the Wyoming Legislature, would have done this. I have attached a copy of one of them, as provided by the Wyoming Legislative Service Office, for your perusal.) And because our small business is run out of a portion of my home, such a law could literally send me to a Wyoming jail (where COVID-19 is running rampant) if I did not allow a deadly virus into my home… absent a Federal requirement that superseded state law.
For this reason, we would like you to add language to at least the final standard – and, if possible, the ETS as well – that either requires smaller businesses to mandate vaccination or explicitly pre-empts state laws that would prohibit smaller businesses from doing so. Because so many businesses are small, such a provision would save lives. Thank you.
The COVID19 injection is a bioweapon. Anyone involved in imposing this regulation should be charged with comitting an act of war on U.S. soil.
I strongly support the proposed rule. It should be swiftly implemented and it should become a final rule. I applaud and support the Biden Administration for these necessary steps to get more Americans vaccinated and turn the tide on COVID-19.
Vaccine requirements are good for the economy. Vaccine mandates have proven successful with only a small fraction of workers choosing to leave their jobs rather than comply. Those who have chosen to not get vaccinated are the minority and the reason this mandate is even needed. The majority want the vaccine, understand vaccines work, and want to work at places were vaccination is required. Employers will gain employees.
Flu shots are mandatory in healthcare; Covid vaccines should be as well. People will elect to get vaccinated, try to get an exemption, or they will quit. Few will be willing to deal with getting tested weekly. Healthcare workers who do not make the safety of those they care for the priority are in the wrong field. Patients want to be safe and get health care from establishments they know are enforcing vaccines. This mandate will bring those who have put off health care needs due to safety back to health care institutions.
The vaccine is free. Those who choose to not get the vaccine should therefore pay for their own testing. Statistics show only a very small subset will not get vaccinated with a mandate. We‘re worrying far too much about pacifying those who choose to be unvaccinated. I urge you to strengthen our economy and protect Americans from COVID by making this mandate the final rule.
As a United States citizen I believe in Freedom of Choice. To mandate someone putting something into their body is living under a dictatorship. Those that support abortion picked up the slogan “My Body My Choice”. If that is true it should be the same for mandating the Covid vaccine!! This will effect many in different fields who have already proven, they will walk off the job, before being MADE to do something they are totally against. That creates a crisis for the economy and we really are in no position to do that, considering how bad it already is. Furthermore, the truckers of America who keep this country running. Should they ban together, and trust me they will, then NO ONE gets the good and/or services we need. All this mandate is doing, is creating complete chaos for the entire Nation. Also, letting in so many immigrants at the Southern Border and we don’t know anything about what they are bringing into this country. Why aren’t they mandated to be vaccinated before entering the country. It seems to me there are different rules for different people. Research has shown this vaccine is killing people or leaving them with severe after effects. That is another reason so many are against it. This is America and everyone should have the freedom to choose, not be mandated!!
Your organization is committing murder by trying to enforce a genetic modification shot. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines are to stop you from getting the virus this mRNA genetic modification shot has killed more people then Fake COVID did. If you play into buydens mandate we promise to sue you for try to force people out of jobs over a virus that has a 99.97 survival rate. I have shared this far and wide plan on being harrassed by we the people because you will never walk down the streets again GOD the only person to decide what we need in life. You are acting as the devil and trying to mass murder people. It is not a law and only laws can be enforced.
This all sounds great until we add the fact that all the Covid Vaccines are EXPERIMENTAL USE ONLY. Thus cannot legally be an enforced mandate.
Additionally, I must remain anonymous due to the over-reach of government regarding my own health. CDC and FDA refuse to recognize that all Americans have the legal rights and freedoms of individual medical choice
This whole regulation is a disgrace and will stop business in our country. Please completely reverse this.
This administrative rule states “The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is issuing an emergency temporary standard (ETS) to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers (100 or more employees) from the risk of contracting COVID-19 by strongly encouraging vaccination.”
There is no need to forcibly protect unvaccinated people from covid. There is very little risk to healthy individuals, greater than 99.7% survival. Individuals have the responsibility for one’s own health and well-being. No one should be able to force another person ‘for their own good’ to submit to a medical procedure or practice that they do not want.
These shots are not vaccines. Changing the definition of a thing does not change the thing. And the CDC has changed the definition of a vaccine in response to this rollout. Vaccines are by the original definition supposed to prevent acquisition and transmission of a disease. These covid shots do not offer such protection. They merely offer a less intense version of the illness. “Vaccinated” people (by CDC Director Walensky’s admission) can acquire and transmit covid. In fact, currently, those countries (i.e Israel, Iceland) that have the highest vaccination rate are also dealing with the highest case rates in the world.
There are a huge variety of successful prophylactic and early treatments that have virtually no side effects. The fact that the CDC and FDA along with medical communities and doctors went to such great lengths to suppress life-saving treatments like Vitamin D, C, and the well known and used drugs HCQ and Ivermectin is criminal and deliberate. There are many people who have gotten rich from these shots being pushed. They would not have been given an EUA if there were alternatives.
The covid shots have the worst record of adverse events of any shots in the last 30 years combined! The CDC maintained website VAERS.com records adverse events including death from shots. This site has been evaluated by Harvard scientists who estimate only 1-10% of all adverse events are recorded.
As of October 22, 2021 these shots have caused: 17,619 deaths, 86,542 Hospitalizations, 94,163 urgent care visits, 130,795 doctor office visits, 7,706 anaphylaxis reactions, 10,4465 cases of Bell’s Palsy, 2,712 miscarriages, 8656 heart attacks, 10,956 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis, 27,277 individuals permanently disabled, 4014 cases of thrombocytopenia/low platelet, 19,584 instances of life threatening issues, 32,305 severe allergic reactions, 9,987 cases of shingles.
Multiply these adverse effects by the 10-100 times underreporting and we have carnage caused by a shot that doesn’t protect one from the disease that has a very high rate of survival.
These shots are also quickly losing their efficacy. The fact that the definition of “fully” vaccinated is changing just as fast as the definition of the word “vaccine” is not lost on those who realize this is not about health and well-being. Now to be fully vaccinated 3 shots are going to be required, possibly moving into a recurring 2x/year routine. Each time this shot is injected, you run the established huge risk of adverse effects. This is like playing Russian roulette with your immune system. You will eventually lose.
The thought that “the government” wants to “keep unvaccinated individuals safe” is ludicrous. Clearly, those choosing not to get this injection have done their research and understand the risks of their choices. It is a FAR greater risk for me to get this shot. My personal health and well-being is no one else’s concern. For those who feel the shot should be forced to protect everyone else – including those in the health professions – they clearly do not trust in the efficacy of their shots. If they actually worked, those who got them would have nothing to fear, and would not try to impose their medical decisions on others.
This is nothing short of a tyrannical mechanism of control that will be used to damage everyone who does not submit to it’s demands. This is about a shot today – what is the next thing to be imposed?
Opposition to OSHA’s proposed emergency temporary standard for vaccination and testing.
I do not support OSHA’s egregious step into anyones private healthcare information, this is a road i do not want our country to go down, i respectfully ask OSHA to retract this rule not only because it asks for private medical information, also because it is unenforceable, and will make the supply chain crisis worse than it already is.
The trucking industry is estimated to lose 87% of unvaccinated employees, and 37% of the workforce all together when the industry is already short 80,000 truckers. This is a good way to make our economy falter even worse and make americans lives more strained than they already are at this time.
I urge OSHA to retract this rule, it will only make things worse, you shouldn’t have to force people to get a vaccine, it should be up to every individual between them and their medical professionals.
This is massive government overreach that should not be levied on employers. It is unconstitutional that workers would have this mandate passed on to them simply to provide for themselves
OSHA needs to reevaluate the “grave danger” and “significant risk” posed by COVID-19. This has every appearance of being a politically based rule rather than a ruling based in actual documented risk. A review of data available today (November 5, 2021) on the CDC website shows a cumulative positive case rate for individuals between the ages of 18 and 65 (the age of the workforce) as being 25,270,887. The same site on this date shows a death rate for that age range as being 142,638. Basic math puts the risk of death due to a COVID-19 infection at 0.00564%. This is far from any reasonable definition of “grave danger” or even “significant risk”. The idea that such a comprehensive ruling as universal vaccination does not appear to be based on actual, documentaries risk undermines the dependability of OSHA’s assessment of true risk and has every appearance of being politically motivated. Individuals need to choose for themselves whether or not to accept an injection that is under experimental authorization.
This is massive government overreach that should not be levied on employers. It is unconstitutional that workers would have this mandate passed on to them simply to provide for themselves
I am opposed to the new ETS that has been published. Your new ETS regulations are illegal and a complete overreach of your duty. You have no business or authority to mandate any medical intervetions within the work place. From what I can tell, the new regulations have left out exemptions for medical, religious and philosophical reasons as to why someone would not want to subject themselves to experimental gene therapy. It is very clear you are minions doing the bidding of the Biden Regime. This ETS must be revoked immediately.
Why people aren’t encouraged to test their own T cell immunity (which is the ultimate test of immunity),rather than force feed a shot is beside me. Your own T cells beat this “VAX “any day of the week and to mandate something that is the equivalent of making people wait to go swimming after eating a hotdog is Not only foolish and absurd, but evil. Science demands dialogue and you are shutting down dialogue and worse, ruining peoples livelihoods and lives
The 1st amendment acknowledges individual right to sovereignty over their own body. The 10th amendmendment does not give any agency authority that is not provisioned in the constitution.
The federal government forcing blacks into medical trials after what the FDA did in the Tuskeegee experiments is outrageous!
For decades young mothers were told their body their choice, only to be denied free choice.
Not you Responsibility. Let the employees handle their own health. It is not up to the government or OSHA to regulate who should be vaccinated against what. Stick to your responsibility of making sure that buildings are constructed properly. Let the Health Organizations deal with the health of people. I will not mandate that anybody has a mask or this supposed COVID vaccine (which is just the flu shot and that’s not being mandated). I don’t know their medical history. They don’t know mine. If I feel the need to be given the Flu Shot, I’ll get it. I will not impose my medical beliefs on any of my workers or friends or family. Not my responsibility, nor is it yours. Or Fauci’s or Biden’s or anybody else from the government.
If you try this mandate I will simply stop going to my job managing supply chains for a large Ag company. I have abundant savings and food stockpiled to outlast any of this.
I am uniquely aware of how bad the situation actually is and am confident you will fold before I do.
Have fun not eating!
Forcing a non-sterilizing vaccine (which only protects the vaccinated person), with an unknown safety record is government overreach. We are learning more and more each week about waning efficacy and potential dangers of these vaccines. The fact that England recognizes natural immunity from previous infection and the US does not, doesn’t pass the smell test.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696485/
You are working well outside of the American Constitution and the American people not only know, but will not forget such treason. A virus with a 99.97% survival rate and an injection, proclaimed by the FDA to kill 6 out of 7 people who get it, is not justification for your actions. You will be responsible for the final nail in the coffin of American economic collapse and the deaths of millions of Americans, by the time this is done. The only outcome will be trials that make Nuremberg look like child’s play. EVERY person working within your department should reevaluate their priorities, because what you’ve done will not fade silently into the night while your pocket books get lined. We the People know.
I’m writing as a laborer, who deeply values OSHA and its commitment to workplace safety, and as a citizen who enthusiastcly chose to get their covid19 vaccinations as early as the CDC recommended. But I wish to enthusiastically dissuade you from implementing vaccine requirements from businesses. There is a very large portion of workers that this mandate will harm, as it will force them to choose between their firmly held beliefs about medical autonomy and privacy, and holding their job. Many will be forced into awful situations where they might be forced into the hazards of poverty in order to hold onto their rights. I want you to consider mental health and fear of encroachments of rights into your regulat. I want you to consider that many employers will not comply with actually requiring vaccinations but instead use your mandates as leverage to prevent their employees from speaking out about other risks to their safety that is so essential to OSHAs operation. Thank you for considering my statement.
I strongly disagree with this policy. Please do not implement it. You are encroaching on the freedom of American citizens, and not respecting religious liberty.
I find this to be extremely overreaching…and you are assuring our government in going against the constitution of the United States. Our freedoms are given by God and not by an agency directed to govern the people that fund it. You are a disgrace to Veterans and to all the citizens of the United States. Also, you might want to let Philips know you exempted remote employees .. because when I informed them this morning.. they said they didn’t care and I am still a “voluntary quit” in Feb. Thanks United States of America for telling its citizens that pay your salary to either take a shot in the arm or you can’t make money to feed or shelter your family. This country is doomed
This ETS has no basis in law and is unconstitutional. It is illegal. It should be disregarded and immediately challenged and struck down as illegal. DOL, OSHA and the executive branch do not have legal authority to impose these requirements on anyone or any business. Furthermore, it is in direct violation of HIPPA laws regarding health and medical privacy requirements between employees and employers.
Dear Department of Labor, Your proposed tyrannical and unconstitutional ‘rules’ are a slap in the face to every red-blooded, hard-working American Citizen. My body my choice, except when it comes to vaccines apparently. The 9th and 10th amendment provide for and imply bodily autonomy. Almost everything about this proposal is in direct contradiction with existing law, specifically HIPAA regulations. Per HIPAA, an employer gathering a list of descriptions of healthcare you have received (e.g. vaccine status) coupled with specific employee information (e.g. the roster of employee names) – as stipulated in these rules – is a gross violation of the law and of privacy. The 4th amendment ought to protect my medical records – they are my personal property and you are illegally demanding they be seized without proper judicial process. American Citizens are not felons. You cannot simply demand their records without having a judge sign a warrant specifying the specific records to be seized and why as per the 4th amendment. Finally, besides the obvious total violation of civil rights and privacy this will entail going forward, I call on you to think of the legal precedent this will set going forward. In the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, African Americans were POISONED and MURDERED by the government when they spiked their vaccines with syphilis. You threaten the employment of every minority in this great Nation and demand they take your vaccine that does not even meet FDA standards. You make them take this vaccine today, but what will be in the shots 100 years from now? Or in 1000? Do you trust every subsequent administration to not spike the vaccines to take out a targeted group or political rivals? Congress has not voted any mandate into law. This is a ill-fated power grab by one who would play at being King. An illegal edict that any and every American Citizen is duty bound to disobey if they truly believe in democracy and not in petty tyrants. In the name of all that is Good and Holy, in the name of our Lord God and the inalienable rights he has given us, do NOT implement or enforce these onerous, illegal mandates.
You are NOT a legislative body. You CANNOT make this law because it is not a law. Your rules do not allow workers to make their own informed medical decisions during this experiment.
The Nuremberg Code:
The consent of the human subject in absolute legal capacity is required. (OSHA does not allow for this in the proposed rule!) … … The research procedure should not cause any physical or mental injuries or any harm to people. (VAERS database https://vaers.hhs.gov/ shows over 17,000 deaths from this vaccine alone as of end of October! And, those are just the ones that have been reported!) It should never be conducted where the risk of death of any participant or member of society is evident.(VAERS database https://vaers.hhs.gov/ shows over 17,000 deaths from this vaccine alone!) The risk associated with the research process should be correlated with the benefits associated with it for social wellbeing. (This has not been proven!) … … In case human subjects feel at risk of death or injury during an experiment (I certainly do!), they can quit at any moment. (YOU DO NOT ALLOW FOR THIS! We are still in the experimental phase! Check the Pfizer patents!) If risks in a research process become so evident that it may cause harm to human subjects, the researchers should immediately stop the process. (VAERS database https://vaers.hhs.gov/.)
If you uphold your reason to exist, that is to protect employees and employers, then you will make sure those who choose not to get vaccinated, but are forced to against their will, someone or something should be held financially accountable regardless of the adverse effect and that the individual can sue such entity!
This “rule” is a complete overreach of OSHA, as they have no legal authority to mandate biological or medical requirements of individuals. Further, this “rule”, in an attempt to strong arm the American public is void of any constitutional protocol for passing a law in this country and further holds no scientific or even procedural evidence to live under an ETS. Covid rates are down across the country, vaccinated individuals still spread covid and a 4 month timeline from announcement to implementation are a few obvious ways to demonstrate this is more about political power than the protection of employees. This gross abuse of power by OSHA must be rectified and this ETS must be lifted immediately in order to restore the credibility of the organization.
The vaccines have caused many injuries and death. They are not vaccines, gene therapy, change DNA. They are experimental and makers have zero liability for damages they cause. The health officials have lied from the beginning about what is in the jab, it’s safety, and its efficacy. As more get the jab covid cases rise, this is seen in every country with high vaccination rate. It is unconstitutional to force heathy people to risk their life on a treatment not shown to work. Now you want to take people’s ability to work, pay rent, buy food, if not jabbed. It is cruel, it is medically negligent, it is unconstitutional. I don’t know why members of Congress where allowed to take Ivermectin when it was banned for the people that pay your salaries. I don’t know why NIH, CDC, FDA, and gov officials are not mandated to take the covid vaccine. Actually I do, and it is reprehensible.
The vaccines have caused many injuries and death. They are not vaccines, gene therapy, change DNA. They are experimental and makers have zero liability for damages they cause. The health officials have lied from the beginning about what is in the jab, it’s safety, and its efficacy. As more get the jab covid cases rise, this is seen in every country with high vaccination rate. It is unconstitutional to force heathy people to risk their life on a treatment not shown to work. Now you want to take people’s ability to work, pay rent, buy food, if not jabbed. It is cruel, it is medically negligent, it is unconstitutional. I don’t know why members of Congress where allowed to take Ivermectin when it was banned for the people that pay your salaries. I don’t know why NIH, CDC, FDA, and gov officials are not mandated to take the covid vaccine. Actually I do, and it is reprehensible.
The vaccine is not effective as has been shown in Israel which experienced a higher spike in cases after vaccinations and even higher after the booster. The CDC has recognized that vaccinated people can still die from covid and transmit covid. Currently vaccinated people represent around half of serious cases in many countries.
Compelling workers to lose their jobs or accept an ineffective vaccine will permanently reduce trust in the government and medical institutions in a way that may be catastrophic for society over the coming years.
While you are going business to business please isolate the Covid 19 virus and prove it exists before you tell us to get a vaccine to protect us from something that has never been isolated .
I work for a chemical distribution company who provides chemicals to a number of industries and customers including those who produce COVID test kits and other medications to treat COVID. We, like many others in various industries, are experiencing worker shortages and supply chain issues that delay and/or prevent us from providing materials to much needed customers. We are concerned that this rule will severely impact our ability to continue to run our business, not just for our own company that is already straining under too few workers, but for the manufacturers, truckers, and warehouses that enable us to run our business. The supply chain, truckers specifically are already short handed and this rule will undoubtedly increase that. This is about more than Christmas presents; it is about water treatment for safe drinking water, it is about live-saving medicines reaching the people who need them and so much more. The disruption of business and supply around the country far outweighs any benefit this rule might have. While it is severely damaging to companies with more than 100 workers, it would be business ending for smaller companies. Please consider not enforcing this. Please also do not increase the scope or make this permanent
You lack the Authority for this, there is no medical justification for it, and I will not comply. I will materially Aid anyone else who does not comply. I will serve in a jury or testify against you. Fair warning.
To put it simply: mandating workplace vaccinations as part of a vast science experiment is not only immoral it is also unconstitutional. My comment will undoubtedly get buried with the thousands if others begging for relief from this medical tyranny but I cannot let the opportunity pass by without stating the truth. Stop this medical tyranny and protect the workers.
This is not what our for fathers intended. Follow the Bill of Rights and The Constitution of the United States of America. This is against the religious rights of Americans. The government are not doctors. How can this be a one size fits all. Leave this to the medical community to make these decision based on individuals. Stop politicizing this vaccine. My body my choice. Stop the over reach.
WE WILL NOT COMPLY!
YOU WANT TO DIVIDE AMERICA? THIS IS HOW YOU DO IT. STOP!
The general workforce population, as a numerical majority, is not at risk of death and long-term health effects from Covid-19. Vaccinated and unvaccinated alike have recovered from the infection with the virus with minimal health effects. As has been shown in studies, there is a subset of the working population, that bear a higher risk of death and permanent health effects. However, if a specific employee’s health history shows an increased risk of infection or unusual need for protection, the business should merely be required make a reasonable accommodation for that employee to work safely, such as allowing that job to be performed remotely, providing PPE, and/or regular testing for that individual. A business should not be forced to alter the lives, daily habits, and healthcare prescriptions of all the other workers both in and outside their work environment to accommodate such a minority. I believe strongly in vaccination and have been vaccinated. However, I deem it a staunch government overreach to have “almost unlimited discretion to devise means to achieve the congressionally mandated goal of protecting employee health.” Please note at the end of that quote comes “subject to the constraints of feasibility.” Not only is it not in the government’s power to make intra-bodily healthcare decisions for healthy, cognizant, hard-working Americans thousands of miles from Washington DC, it is also, in no way feasible. Civil disobedience when faced with authoritarianism is part of what it means to be American and freedom from government-produced one-size-fits-all mandates that puts worker’s livelihoods at risk is clearly government hubris at its finest.
Please do NOT impose vaccine mandates. It is “racist” by dividing people into categories based on what they think is best for their bodies. SO BAD.
This rule is a complete overreach by the government. There is absolutely no evidence that COVID-19 presents a “grave risk” to a vast majority of the workforce. Certainly no more risk than the regular seasonal flu. Implementing this policy will undoubtedly lead to people having to make choices between their health by taking an unproven vaccine and their employment. Many will leave employment and create further economic disaster for this country. We are a free nation, this is not Iran, North Korea or China.
Get fucked. We will never comply with Covid “vaccine” mandates. Read the constitution for the reasons why.
This is EVIL, TYRANNICAL, and NEVER may be implemented. We will resist.
I would like to respectfully express my opposition to requiring companies to implement a vaccine mandate in the future. I am aware that weekly testing has been offered as an option and that religious exemptions may be offered as well, but I am strongly opposed on principle to any type of medical mandate being imposed. I don’t think leadership is aware of how many valuable employees companies could potentially lose as a result of such action when we are already struggling to hire and retain top talent. I believe the types of bribery and coercion that have been used to push the vaccine are unethical and that any mandate would ultimately be ruled as unlawful in the courts. A weekly testing option would be an undue burden on families when government and employee subsidies would ultimately be removed and could cost families potentially hundreds of dollars a week for such testing and I don’t believe that only those with a religious objection or natural immunity have the right to make this personal decision in consultation with their own doctor.
And then they insert Hillary, talk about the outrage factor.
Biden makes a few more serious blunders, and his own people take him out on 25. See how that works? Michele Obama appointed VP. You know, because look at the mess that old White Guys got us into……
Muhammed Ali said, “It ain’t bragging, if you can back it up.” So, excuse me for bragging, but in my almost six years as a nationally-syndicated radio and TV host, my predictions have been remarkably accurate. I’m not perfect, but I’m batting close to .990. It’s the best record of anyone in the media.
Advertisement – story continues below https://lockerdome.com/lad/12826698504932966?pubid=ld-8220-674&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com&rid=poal.co&width=836
Almost everything I’ve predicted has come true- including a stolen election based on mail-in voting without Voter ID; a communist takeover of the USA based on lockdowns, Covid mandates and open borders; and Joe Biden being a brain-dead puppet with dementia.
I was already warning on my Newsmax TV show about Biden’s clearly diminished mental capacity back in 2019 and early 2020. It’s all on tape.
This is all Fraudulent and quite illegal. The lack of applying science and natural immunity being ignored is quite telling. It is obvious that the Jab is not about protecting people, please explain how death from all causes is significantly up and they are not COVID deaths. Please explain how COVID patients are sent home to quarantine with no instructions, when there are great treatment protocols using simple stuff like Vit C, D3, and B Vitamins. Please explain why some lots of “vaccine” kill hundreds, whilst other lots don’t kill any? And why are these logistically hard to handle lots distributed all over the USA, east and west coasts, south, and midwest when it would be much easier to ship a single lot to a single place?
The Furin cleavage site, never existing in any close relative Corona virus, makes it quite clear (at least Fishy as….) that the COVID is a bio-weapon released along with a 24/7 stream of media non-sense. The early videos out of China showing people dropping dead in the streets, and hospitals with dead body bags lining both sides of the aisles are equally damning that this is a narrative of which China is a huge participant. The early praise of the tyrannical lockdowns in China by the WHO was quite obvious in intent “tyranny is good”. The videos of huge truck spraying chemicals fogging entire city streets was also laughable, but they created a lot of fear.
Of the various lots of Jabs being distributed, most have at least the Spike S Protein being generated, which targets the ACE-2 receptor sites which are numerous in Testes and Ovaries, and that seems to be a primary goal, a decrease in fertility. The massive amounts of spontaneous abortions from jabbed pregnant women deserves the highest punishments, where punishments that would normally be cruel and unusual, should be made usual. It is already very obvious that a huge decrease in fertility is already being seen in USA and elsewhere.
The simplest analysis of VAERS data shows that in just months, the Jab had killed more people than ALL THE OTHER vaccines, tallied up for 30 years.
The complicit and participatory mass media, owned by just a handful of men, have carried water for all the lies and intentional misdirection. We understand how Nuremberg only applies to Government Actors, and hence the intentional “method” to try to get other Corporate actors, and lower level agencies to push the Jabs. Those at the top pushing this narrative and crimes want protection from international courts when the full impacts of their mis-deeds become beyond glaringly obvious.
And the lies about how the Jabs prevent serious illness and death, when ICUs have more than half Jabbed people. And then the darling company, of the narrative pushers, Pfizer, is rewarded with rebranding a 2003 anti-viral pill which can be made cheaply, and then being allowed to charge health care plans $500 and up for treatment. And it is beyond shameful that the FDA pretending that a super safe and cheap drug, Ivermectin, was not intended for people and that it was only for Horses and Cows. And criminal to withhold this proven anti-viral from Americans. Duly noted: IF there was a treatment available for COVID then it would have been impossible to issue the Emergency Use Authorization for the experimental Jabs.
The preponderance of evidence all points in one direction….the first year was all directed towards one main goal….to get as many people injected with as many formulations as possible, and keep them in fear so that they keep getting injected on a regular basis. Then when dissenting individuals take their freedom of speech “too far” against the narrative, they can be given a “special jab” that either teaches them a lesson or kills them outright.
Then another excuse like Omicron is used to drastically ramp fear again. It is already clear that the South African doctors that detected, and TREATED, Omicron COVID list it as a “VERY MILD” disease, so the border shutdowns and ridiculous action by bad actor State of New York, are also very telling
People of OSHA, I am putting you on notice. You, as Government actors, can be put on trial under the international agreements of Nuremberg. The evidence is abundantly clear that these experimental chemical agents (mislabeled as vaccines) are extremely dangerous, they are killing people acutely in large numbers, they are likely to and and being shown to have longer term dangers beyond sterilization of people, and they hardly work and they are not persistent.
The data is clear: The risk is high and the benefits are minor, and the younger you are, the higher the risk to reward ratio becomes. See attachments which compare the death rates from COVID for various age groups to the death rate from the Jab based on 3 selected VAERS reporting rates.
We the people DEMAND that you cease and desist in these immoral, illegal, and unconscionable actions.
Regulations.gov is a web-based federal rulemaking application supporting the United States government in its rulemaking process. Regulations.gov is provided as a public service to increase participation in the government’s regulatory activities by offering a central point for submitting comments on regulations. This website is an official United States government computer system. Information presented on this website is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. Unauthorized attempts to upload information or change information maintained on this website are strictly prohibited and may be subject to criminal prosecution under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1995.
Regulations.gov contains regulatory and non-regulatory docket information, as determined by the issuing department or agency. Docket information includes Federal Register notices, supplementary reports and other documents related to the action, and comments and public submissions received by the department or agency. Each department and agency manages its own data within the website according to agency-specific regulatory policy.
The Regulations.gov website includes a compilation of rules and notices as published by the U.S. Office of the Federal Register. Every effort is made to ensure the website includes all rule and proposed rule that are currently open for public comment. Inclusion or exclusion of material from this compilation has no independent legal significance. Users who want to verify the current status of a proposed or final rule and associated comment requirements are urged to check the official edition of the Federal Register, which is available online via the FederalRegister.gov website.
Comments and Public Submissions
Comments may be submitted through this website, or by any method identified in the specific Federal Register document. Any comment you provide through this website should be submitted in accordance with the directions in the Federal Register document. You should be aware that requirements for submitting comments may vary by department or agency. For purposes of submitting comments, some agencies may require that you include personal information, such as your name and email address, on the comment form. Each agency manages its own data within the site, according to agency-specific comment review and posting policy. Comments may be publicly disclosed in a docket or on the Internet (via Regulations.gov, a federal agency website, or a third-party, non-government website with access to publicly-disclosed data on Regulations.gov).
Do not submit information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as Confidential Business Information “CBI”) to Regulations.gov. Comments submitted through Regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information submitted. Some agencies may impose special requirements for submitting CBI or copyrighted works. To view any additional information or instructions for submissions, refer to the specific Federal Register notice on which you are commenting and the website of the department or agency.
Terms of Participation
Public comments help agencies develop regulations; we encourage comments from all viewpoints. Comments submitted to Regulations.gov should be the submitter’s own comments or be submitted with the commenter’s permission. The development of federal regulations is within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Government’s executive branch agencies. It is a violation of federal law to knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation including false statements about your identity or your authority to submit a comment on someone else’s behalf, in relation to the development of such federal regulations, including through comments submitted on Regulations.gov. See 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
Subject to 18 U.S.C. § 1028(c), it is also a violation of federal law to knowingly use, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person in connection with the violation of any federal law or the commission of a felony under state or local law. See 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7).
By clicking the submit button, you are verifying that you are not making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation regarding your identity or your authority to submit on someone else’s behalf with regard to the comment you are submitting on Regulations.gov, and that you are not using, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person, real or fictitious, in connection with any comment you are submitting on Regulations.gov.
Intended Use of Information
Federal rulemaking agencies consider public comments during the development of proposed or final rules, as well as comments solicited for opinions on a program initiative, scientific study, respective agency guidance document, or proposed standard. By providing comments through this website, you are consenting to their use and consideration by federal departments and agencies. Agencies may provide additional instructions informing you how to grant consent for use of voluntarily-provided information.
Electronic comments you submit directly through the Regulations.gov website will be maintained in two different locations depending on the agency. For agencies listed on this site as participating in the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS), comments will be stored electronically within the system. For agencies listed as Non-Participating (agencies not using FDMS to manage their regulatory process), comments will be sent directly to that agency. In both situations, the department or agency receiving your comment is considered the official custodian of the comment. Your comment will not be considered until it has been properly received by that department or agency in accordance with the requirements described in the Federal Register notice. Users who want to verify that a department or agency has received their comment are urged to check directly with that department or agency. Each agency manages its own data within the site, according to agency-specific comment review and posting policy.
The material you submit to a federal department or agency through Regulations.gov may be seen by various people. Any personal information included in the comment form or in an attachment will be provided to the department or agency to which your comment is directed and may be publicly disclosed in a docket or on the Internet (via Regulations.gov, a federal agency website, or a third-party, non-government website with access to publicly-disclosed data on Regulations.gov).
Regulations.gov offers its public data in machine readable format via an Application Programming Interface (“API”), including comment submitter information (e.g., commenter name or address) if included in the comment submission posted by an agency on Regulations.gov. Third party organizations may use an API to build related applications for the web, desktops, and mobile devices. For additional information, view the Regulations.gov Privacy Notice.
PRIVACY NOTICE
Regulations.gov is a web-based application supporting the United States Government in the federal regulatory process. Regulations.gov is provided as a public service to access and participate in the federal regulatory process. On this site you can:
Search for a regulation such as a proposed rule, final rule, or Federal Register (FR) notice;
Submit a comment on a regulation or on another comment;
Submit an application, petition, or adjudication document;
View docket contents, including public comments and submissions;
Sign up for email alerts about a specific regulation is temporarily unavailable.
Sharing and Disclosure
Comments may be submitted through this website, or by any method identified in the specific Federal Register document, and posted on Regulations.gov. Each department or agency manages its own data within the website, according to the agency-specific comment review and posting policy. The material you submit to a federal department or agency through Regulations.gov may be seen by various people. Any personally identifiable information (e.g., name, address, phone number) included in the comment form or in an attachment will be provided to the department or agency to which your comment is directed and may be publicly disclosed in a docket or on the Internet (via Regulations.gov, a federal agency website, or a third-party, non-government website with access to publicly-disclosed data on Regulations.gov).
Regulations.gov offers its public data in machine readable format via an Application Programming Interface (“API”), including comment submitter information (e.g., commenter name or address) if included in the comment submission posted by the agency on Regulations.gov. Third party organizations may use an API to build related applications for the web, desktops, and mobile devices.
Retention of Information
Electronically submitted information is maintained and destroyed according to the principles of the Federal Records Act and the agency records schedules approved by the National Archives and Records Administration. In some cases information submitted through Regulations.gov may become an agency record and therefore might be subject to a Freedom of Information Act request.
Please note that API users are required to comply with the Regulations.gov Terms of Service, however we have no control over data retention by third-party users who have stored the data.
Site Security
For site security purposes and to ensure that this service remains available to all users, this government computer system employs applications that monitor access to identify unauthorized attempts to upload or change information, or otherwise cause damage. If such monitoring reveals evidence of possible abuse or criminal activity, such evidence may be provided to appropriate law enforcement officials. Unauthorized attempts to upload or change information on this server are strictly prohibited and may be punishable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act or other law.
Information Automatically Captured
The Regulations.gov website does not automatically collect personal information about you, unless you choose to provide it (e.g., on the comment submission webform). Regulations.gov may send anonymous statistics to third party sites to help analyze use patterns of the site. This information is aggregated into reports that allow us to learn how visitors interact with the site so we can work to enhance system features.
Regulations.gov collects the following: domain name and Internet Protocol addresses from which you are visiting; type of browser and operating system used to access the website; and the time and date of each page visit on the website. This website uses this information to create summary statistics, which are then used to assess what information is of least interest, determining technical design specifications, and identifying system performance or problem areas.
Like many websites, Regulations.gov uses “persistent cookie” technology to follow site usage activity, but only aggregate information is captured. These cookies uniquely identify a browser on a computer, but never a person. In other words, if the same person uses Chrome and Internet Explorer, two unique browser cookies will be assigned, one for each browser, so that person will be counted as two different visitors because visits are based on browsers, not computers or persons. We use persistent cookies in order to understand how people are using the site and how we can make it better.
If you prefer to opt out of having the cookie installed on your machine or device, adjust your internet browsers cookie settings. If you use multiple browsers on your machine or device, you will need to complete this process for each browser used. Please visit www.usa.gov/optout_instructions.shtml for instructions for common browsers.
Handling Email
We use email addresses that you provide (e.g., signing up for notifications or filling out the “Contact Us” webform) only to respond to your request. Such application information is carefully protected and not available in or retained by web tracking software. We may forward your email to a government employee who can best answer your questions. We do not disclose, give, sell, or transfer any personal information about our visitors, unless required for law enforcement or statute.
Social Media Sites
While Regulations.gov maintains a presence on social media sites (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) in order to share government information and engage with the public, we do not collect any Personally Identifiable Information through those sites. We also do not use personal information made available by the user to these third-party sites.
Privacy Act of 1974
The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) protects the personal information submitted to Regulations.gov and retained in the system. The Privacy Act regulates how the government can disclose, share, provide access to, and maintain the personal information that it collects. Not all information collected online is covered by the Privacy Act.
The Act’s major provisions require agencies to:
Publish a Privacy Act Notice in the Federal Register explaining the existence, character, and uses of a new or revised System of Records (SOR);
Keep information about you accurate, relevant, timely, and complete to assure fairness in dealing with you;
Allow you to, upon request, access and review your information held in a SOR and request amendment of the information if you disagree with it.
Thank you for the exchange of Thanksgiving notes. I know you appreciate our Mother would not have deemed such succinct (m)utterings (!) “letters”, short bursts of hastily written thoughts, the electronic equivalents “twits” or “text messages”. A LETTER back in the day required a ream of typing paper on hand and, at a minimum, two, even three dozen sheets of carbon (!!) paper. If only to honor the memory of two dear now departed souls – our Mother and my oldest and best friend, an M.D., I shall assay an honest-to-GOD letter to you and others of our family and close friends, thus honoring and carrying on my Mother’s preferred practice.
Today as you also appreciate, your brother a veteran Doom & Gloomer, I speak more usually about that which is artificial, human conceits at best, after Nature’s own natural took a discrete if not discreet back seat to “progress” and “progressives”, “environmentalists”, “anti-individualistic socialist communitarians” (aka “communists | corporatists” in older lingo). [We have re-buttered up!!] As seems the age-old practice of The Power$ That Be, TV adverts had warned us: “It’s not NICE to fool Mother Nature!”, which TP$TB proceeded to do with margarine and few gazillion other “modern products”. In our lifetimes, all that consummated merely Phase N of countless other forays in the “material world”, battle grounds and fronts each and all in The War Against Mankind. “…With no part left untouched…”, as Arlo Guthrie wryly commented during his “Alice’s Restaurant” ballad in a verse dealing, appropriately enough, with his draft-era physical examination prior to induction into the US Army (right, as if, “I will not comply”!).
As an unabashed veteran Doom & Gloomer, I often refer to seemingly more innocent decades, especially the Age of Global coolingwarming “weather climate change”, which scam still lurks beneath, around, and layered over the Great COVID Scamdemic, the latter fair to call the biggest psychological operation in recorded human history. In actuality, given real and true and accurate history edited and re-written by victors probably for several millennia – I know, hard to fathom off the top of one’s head! – we got born into the heyday of predators salivating for prey, TP$TB having prepared the way for centuries literally! Both in fact and in conviction, The War Against Mankind commenced so long ago we seek its beginnings in earliest extant myths. As a passing reference, the words Archon and Gnostics and Phoenicians might suffice as I move on from here to other topics germane to the day.
We have long since entered decades – I optimist deploy the plural while Me pessimist scoffs quietly behind hands covering a wickedly pained grimace! – when funerals outnumber both weddings and christenings counted together, a time exacerbated by many not getting “hitched” and not having children! We might speak of the commonly practiced scattering of ashes of one’s (then) former vehicle. Graves per se seem so yesterday.
Soon we shall have the option of “donating” our physical body – preferably along with still functioning organs, not only to Big Science but also to Big Med and its joined-at-the-hip evil twin, Big Pharma, born respectively of (a) body mechanics and blood letting and (b) patent medicine, never venturing much further into healing and health, both “Biggies” today primary perpetrators and consumers of fresh baby parts obtained from still living, viable babies in the womb. Can there be greater sin? The science-fiction-y, futuristic, dystopian novel Soylent Green pulled a punch or two, as it turns out. The Truth of Reality goes much darker, unto blackness itself.
My dear doctor friend, may his soul find spiritual balm, immediate rest, and indefinite solace (not solitude!), had an oncologically nasty exit from this plane. Before the terminating worst, he and I had engaged a series of occasions extending over several years to discuss “after life”, whether or not it “exists” (!), all the usual considerations. As so few seem able today, he and I agreed, most of the literature (secular and spiritual), nearly the entirety of religion, appeared intended to obfuscate, to conceal, and to befuddle and fool common folk, all the while taking in high-falutin’ educated atheistic, agnostic, skeptical, solipsistic elite AND self-righteous, dressed-to-the-hilt religious poohbahs. Politics and religion and worse subjects (to most I know!) dominated our discourse and written exchanges.
For example, four to five years ago, I could not disabuse the good doctor of his reflexive, hopeful support of Donald J. (!) Trump as “POTUS” any more than I could dissuade his polar opposite in a friend (Ph.D., Psychology) suffering to this day from TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome)! JUST WHAT IS IT about the sheer logic, symbolic obviousness of the good Rev. Dodgson’s Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum that modern, thinking folks cannot grok?? I do not understand! Perhaps when I too get to the “other side”….
Many, many years before in college (1966-1967), we and others would sit late at night through to wee hours in our first-floor, sex-segregated dormitory hallway – serendipitously well designed as a site of “super-ball tournaments”. (We relegated such “serious”, standardized games as contract bridge [of which I also partook] to the common dormitory lobby.) Backs against painted concrete blocks, never a thought for creature comforts, we vigorously discussed, rationally or metaphorically, Life, Death, and The Reason WHY. Later hindered by inexorably advancing age – now both of us “doctors”, he and I, he the kind that (used to) help people, aided by broader, more diverse experiences than we had then to share at ages 18 and 19 years, respectively, Dr. He and Dr. Me managed again and again to solve the world’s main problems at least partly and to answer questions of mutual interest to us.
Then, the Earth turned sufficiently to declare a new day dawned – whereupon, eventually, always, he and I and all of us found the very same problems festering anew! Nature had renewed, only Time “wasted” and, in a slightly smilingly sense, only our losing a degree or two of physical and mental stamina for the next day or so. Overall, we gained little and lost Nothing to the maya of moments ahead. In recompense, to a certain fateful time, as grown-up children, hand in hand, Dr. He and Dr. Me reaped rewards of solidarity and depth of friendship, the capital “F” variety that sufficed us both unto the day, to this very day, as we might rhyme.
In the end, which my doctor friend encountered before us, an uncountably large number of souls gone before and lined up behind, the latter abiding in patience (or not!), awaiting the unknown appointed hour, a welcoming spirit contending with feelings of fear, fragments of memorably imprinted lines of songs come to my mind in GOD’s way of teaching, for instance, the following: “…my only friend”, “you go your way, I’ll go mine”, and “the love you make is equal to the love you take”. Lost in the witting welter of bad influences that beset mankind, immersed in cesspools constituted by comparatively few poisoned springs from which putrid, fluoridated flows emanate for our imbibing, I too struggle to grasp firm hold of outstretched arms with life-jackets and floats, scarcely able to believe, much less have full faith, despite eyes wider open than ever, certainly blinded neither by sunlight nor by electric torches, still seeking to see unfiltered Light, a Fool’s Errand, of course!
Yet, I have confidence. I shall not find myself alone when I embrace my personal end, albeit in an atmosphere of not knowingness, with doubts hardly commensurate with those of Thomas, so magnitudinous for (reportedly) a direct apostle of the Master Jesus, for GOD’s sake! Like “folk tales”, I wonder whether that New Testament story (among so many others) got included for its pedagogical worth, if not as a deliberately ironic “faithful account” by editors and re-writers of “books” of the New Testament. I find it impossible to accept that degree of skepticism in a man who had a spiritual awakening and came to greater maturity under the tutelage of the Master Jesus. After all, ancient myths had incorporated this theme (rising from the “dead”, or ashes, if you will, not to mention, in the lifetime of Thomas himself, the fate and resuscitation of Lazarus!). Nothing new under the sun! Though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death….
When I do come to an end, I shall think it not too much to ask of GOD – an early, post-mortem “To Do” if not a reward for good, certainly not stellar behavior – to permit my tracking Gordon down on the “other side”, to be together again, this timeless moment on the banks of the heavenly river flowing infinitely slowly, to hash over by then to us almost mythical times. We shall once again ponder next adventures, whether together or apart. Still alive and “kicking against the pricks” – an act against which John Irving (“The Hotel New Hampshire”) strongly counselled – I remain grateful for the moments Dr. He and I shared this lifetime, face to face, in writing, and mostly in spirit.
See you anon, dear Friend, after we both doff the title “doctor”!
Did my best, sister, several drafts! Environmentalists will applaud my savings on “carbon paper.” All the rest, not sure! 😉
May our hearts, the hearts of all mankind, be filled with Love, Joy, and Peace, always.
1. The UNIFIED FIELD. Newton, Lagrange, Coulomb and Maxwell all gave us UFT’s.
2. RELATIVITY. Relativity is true; many of the equations are not. The muon, lightclock, Minkowski, Friedmann, Pound-Rebka, and the falsification of gamma.
3. CALCULUS. The calculus works, despite many fudges and cheats.
4. QUANTUM PHYSICS. Early mistakes, including superposition, entanglement, tunneling, nonlocality, Bohr’s equations.
5. ELECTROMAGNETICS. Solid-state fudging, current, inductance. Also the Sun and planets. Tides. Bode’s Law and interplanetary influences.
7a. My Opposition.I have bumped this paper up to section i., to be sure my opposition didn’t miss it. Also see #367 below. 10pp.
7b. A Letter from the Mainstream. I publish here a series of emails I received several years ago from a mainstream physicist, as confirmation from the inside that I am right, both in my criticisms of academic physics and in my new theories.
7c. Another Letter from the Mainstream. I publish here a more recent email from a mainstream researcher, showing that not only am I being read by real physicists in the field, but that I am able to solve their problems where the mainstream cannot.
7d. Something for My Critics. A general Google search on my papers find something astonishing: many are outranking Wikipedia, Harvard, MIT, and the Dictionary on their respective topics. 20pp.
SECTION 1: The UNIFIED FIELD
8. The Moon Gives up a Secret.Numbers from the Moon are analyzed to show that “gravity” is a compound field. 4pp.
9. The Unified Field Theory.Newton’s gravitational equation is shown to be a compound equation that includes the E/M field. I mathematically separate the two field equations, do transforms on them, and create simple and useful Unified Field Equations. 24pp.
10. The Unified Field Equation is Confirmed.I show that my velocity equation from the galactic rotation problem is equivalent to my relativistic unified field equation, from the paper above. 2pp.
200 (moved). Perturbation Theory in the Light of Charge.This is a continuation of my paper on Laplace, showing specific examples of the charge field in historical field equations. I also show Newton’s close pass to the Lagrangian. 8pp.
23. Is Big G a Constant? No.A brief clarification on this, as well amusing commentary on Rupert Sheldrake and his detractors. 6pp.
SECTION 2: RELATIVITY
24. Relativity as a Concept.An introduction to the problem, preparing the reader for the mathematical arguments in later papers. 6pp.
25. Relativity Demystified.Here I try to explain both SR and GR in the simplest and clearest possible terms, for laymen and experts alike. 14pp.
26. The Michelson/Morley Interferometer.Here I explain the flaws in various conceptualizations of the interferometer, showing that no fringe effect should have been expected. It was originally published as Appendix A to the long paper in chapter 30. 12pp.
28. The Discovery of First-Degree Relativity and the Refutation of Gamma. This is the paper I sent to several journals, including Annalen der Physik and Physical Review Letters, from 2001 to 2004. It condenses the information from the longer papers in chapters 12 and 13. 21pp.
29. A Critique of Einstein’s Original Paper.Here I attack Einstein line for line, using “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” (Annalen der Physik, 1905) as my text. This was to answer critics of my first paper [chapter 13] who believed that Einstein’s paper of 1905 still had precedence over math published later in the books Relativity and The Meaning of Relativity. This paper was originally published as Appendix C to the longer paper below. 12pp.
30. An Algebraic Correction to the Transformation Equations (The Lorentz Equations) of Special Relativity.This is my first paper on Special Relativity. It includes new first- and second-degree transforms, as well as new transforms for movement toward an observer and at an angle to an observer. In addition, it explains the interferometer, discusses the Hafele-Keating experiment, and suggests a solution to the Pioneer Anomaly. 48pp.
32. The Light Clock.A close analysis of the light clock, showing the many ways it fails as a visualization of time dilation. 3pp.
33. A Final Argument against x’ = x – vt.A short addendum to my proofs against this equation, once again using a text of Feynman as an example. 2pp.
34. The Equation x’ = x – vt, Again. One more useful visualization of the problem, focusing this time on the immobility of origins in relative motion. 3pp.
41. How New Transforms in Special Relativity Affect Mass, Momentum and Energy Equations.Here I show that Einstein’s mass and energy transforms are also incorrect, including the famous E=mc2. I also show, for the first time, that the classical equation E=mv2/2 is not an approximation. Finally, I derive the number 108 for the proton. 41pp.
45. More Problems with the Friedmann Metric.I show that the generic metric is mathematically compromised in many ways, the most important of which is its hidden derivation from x’ = x – vt. 7pp.
46. The Einstein Field Equations, Part 1.I continue my previous analyses of the General Theory, going straight the original papers of Einstein. 14pp.
47. The Einstein Field Equations, Part 2.I continue my previous analyses of the General Theory, concentrating here on subsection 5, where I show the total collapse of the proof. 5pp.
48. The Einstein Field Equations, Part 3.I continue my previous analyses of the General Theory, concentrating here on subsection 13, where I show how the fundamental tensor fails. 8pp.
49. Lorentz Invariance.How my corrections affect so-called Invariance, covariance, and violations. 4pp.
50. A Critique of General Relativity.A refutation of Einstein’s thought problem of the spinning disk and an analysis of the tensor calculus. Also, a solution to the primary problem of GR (the deflection of starlight) without tensors or Riemann. 13pp.
53. The Aberration of Starlight,including analysis of Airy’s water-filled telescope, the Sagnac Effect, the Hammar experiment, and the Lodge experiment. 18pp.
72. A Re-definition of the Derivative (why the calculus works—and why it doesn’t).This paper establishes for the first time the true foundation of the calculus. Rather than pursue a diminishing differential, as has been the quest of history, I have discovered the constant differential underlying the basic equation of the calculus. In doing this, I show that instantaneous values are impossible. 40pp.
77. The Derivative of log(x) is also Wrong.I show more problems with the Modern Calculus using my simple differential tables. I find a new slope for log(x) which is fantastically close to the current slope, but which comes from a completely different analysis. 5pp.
78. A Study of Variable Acceleration.I show that the calculus is currently taught upside down, by analyzing a textbook solution of cubed acceleration. 8pp.
80. Trig “Derivatives” found without the old Calculus.Here I show that my simple exponent table from my calculus paper, and the constant differential, apply just as easily to trig functions. 3pp. Also proof the chain rule is fudged.
82. Another Fatal Flaw in the Historical Foundation of the Calculus.A further flaw in the current proof of the derivative, specifically in the assumption that the terms in an infinite series can approach a limit. I show that the sum approaches the limit, but the terms do not, nullifying the accepted procedure. 4pp.
85. A Clarification of the Equation a=v2/r. I import new information from my π papers to extend my findings regarding orbits. I also show that the centripetal acceleration is not instantaneous. 6pp.
89. Quantum Mechanics and Idealism.My paper on the calculus is tied to QED here. Also a comparison of the idealisms of Heisenberg and Berkeley. Finally, a disproof of both idealisms, and a simple logical and mathematical refutation of the Copenhagen interpretation. 10pp.
91. Superposition.Both superposition and the wave-particle duality are explained mechanically, with a straightforward visualization. This falsifies the Copenhagen interpretation in the most direct way imaginable. 5pp. Also see #72 below.
92a. Superposition Again.The problem of beam splitters in sequence is solved mechanically, with diagrams. 6pp.
92b. Polarizers in Sequence. I pull apart another Youtube video for my readers, showing the layers of misdirection we continue to get from mainstream physics. 4pp.
93. Quantum Entanglement.A critique of David Z. Albert’s new article at Scientific American, and a mechanical explanation of entanglement. 8pp.
94. Quantum Teleportation? NO.I show that the current interpretation is fudged in at least three major places. 6pp.
95. CHSH Bell Tests.Another bold mathematical cheat from the mainstream, done right under your nose. 3pp.
96. Schrodinger’s Cat.Where I give Schrodinger’s cat mouth-to-mouth, bringing him back to life. 5pp.
97. On Quantum Nonlocality.I show the real mechanical solution, correcting and extending the wavefunction to do it. 6pp.
106. More Problems with Bohr.Part 1 of 2, preparing us to look at the absorption lines of hydrogen. 8pp.
107. Rewriting the Rydberg Formula.I show how the Balmer equation and Rydberg equation can be rewritten to show the mechanics of the charge field. Part 2 of a two part analysis. 8pp.
108b. Levitation by Heat. I analyze a recent experiment and announcement from the University of Chicago, showing how it acts as proof of my theory of heat, my theory of rising charge, and disproof of mainstream theory across the board. 12pp.
108c. New “Electron Paradox” again proves my Charge Field. I show that the “superballistic” motion of electrons in metals is not a paradox or quantum effect, but a simple outcome of charge channeling and photon potentials. 9pp.
112. The Stern-Gerlach experiment.The mathematical and axiomatic flaws in the experiment, including the illogic of a dipole electron and a spin of 1/2. 6pp.
120. An Analysis of Anderson Localization.A destruction and a replacement. Anderson Localization falls with the Drude-Sommerfeld model. Also a look at bio-reflectivity. 27pp.
135. The Cause of the Solar Cycles.The magnetic and sunspot cycle is shown to be caused by charge from the Jovians. 8pp.
135b. Climate and the Seasons.I just found a paper from more than a year ago that I posted but forgot to link into this Updates page. So it is new to you, I think. 14pp.
135c. The Next Maximum.Where I fine-tune the Solar Cycles, by including the line to the Galactic Core. 22pp.
135d. Are You Ready for Some Good News?I provide the full charts for the Solar Cycles, showing both the since wave and the amplitudes, by including angle to Core as well as angles among the planets. I also provide a detained prediction of the next maximum. 33pp.
140. More Trouble with Tides.An analysis of Newton’s Prop. 66. And I show the simple math proving the eccentricity of the Moon is caused by the Solar Wind. 10pp.
147. The Strange Moon Enceladus.Where we discover this moon is far too bright for current theory to explain. 17pp.
148. More on Enceladus and Albedo.I show that the mainstream has covered up the brightness of all celestial bodies, including the Moon. I replace “opposition surge” with a mechanical explanation using the charge field. 11pp.
167. Celestial Mechanics.A demonstration of the inadequacies of current theory regarding gravity, orbits, and nebulae. 18pp.
168. Another Hole in Celestial Mechanics.The late Ralph Rene gives us an important clue: The force on the Moon from the Sun is greater than the force on the Moon from the Earth. 4pp.
171. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part I.No curved space, no force at a distance, no force-carrying particle. Gravity is explained here simply in terms of straight-line motion. Mass, inertia and gravity are all shown to be equivalent, reducible to the same motions. 9pp.
175. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part V.The aberration of starlight and gravity at the quantum level are explained. A proposal concerning the strong force is also made, linking it to the expansion of matter. 14pp.
181. The Speed of Gravity.I show that the speed of gravity is not c, but infinite, by analyzing papers of Fomalont & Kopeikin, van Flandern, and Carlip. 11pp.
182a. The Cause of Gravity.I show perhaps a better way to create the vector of gravity, without expansion. 5pp.
186. The Allais Effect and Majorana.Plus commentary on LeSage, Podkletnov, NASA, Wiki, and others. Showing how my compound field answers anomalies where other fields do not. 32pp.
192b. New Particles? No, Bad Theory.I show that the mainstream is not detecting new particles at the south pole, it is detecting more proof of my core theory and my theory of through charge. 5pp.
198a. Canada’s Gravity Deficit.I replace the Simons/Hager pseudo-theory with a real mechanical theory, using the unified field. 13pp.
198b. The Wilkes Land Anomaly and the Charge Field. I show the “gravity” anomaly in the Antarctic is caused by neither a giant crater nor by a buried alien object, but by the incoming charge vortex. 10pp.
211. The PLANCK Probe’s CBR Map.Rather than indicate the Cosmic Background Radiation, the newest maps are clear evidence of my ambient Charge Field. 6pp.
222b. Black Hole Signatures Called into Question.Where we look closely at a recent peer-reviewed paper on black holes, finding that mainstream physicists are not all onboard. 6pp.
232. A Reworking of Quantum Chromodynamics,while dismissing the quark, the bosons, the gluons, the strong force, the weak force, and the Higgs field. Also including a new analysis of beta decay. 22pp.
233. Hadronization.An analysis of the sad theory of hadronization. 8pp.
234. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.I analyze NMR as an outcome of charge channeling. Also an analysis of EPR, Larmor precession, and the magnetic moment. 21pp.
236. More on the Orbiton.A continuation of the previous paper and a close reading of the letter at Nature, showing how the data on electron splitting is pushed. 11pp.
244. Higgs Parade gets Rained Out.A long analysis of the formal Higgs announcement, showing it is pushed math and propaganda. 20pp.
245a. A Higgs Update.A December 2012 announcement by LHC confirms my predictions from September, concerning multiple “Higgs” at the 120GeV level. 5pp.
245b. The Bottom Baryon. I show that the new “beauty” baryon isn’t a baryon and that the theory around it isn’t at all beautiful. I show how to create it with spins instead of quarks. 18pp.
245c. The Pentaquark. A better theory, using spin mechanics. 11pp.
256. The Electron Radius as a Function of c.I show the flaw in the current equation for the classical electron radius: a scaling constant has been left out, giving us a radius too large by 252x. 6pp.
262b. More on the Fine Structure Constant. I show yet another way to calculate and interpret the fine structure constant, using another gap in mainstream numbers. 9pp.
262c. The Fine Structure Constant Again. I simplify this problem down one more time, answering Feynman’s biggest question in the most concise manner possible. 5pp.
267. The Stefan-Boltzmann Law,a simplified derivation, showing the mechanics beneath the equation. Also, how to apply the equation to a sphere rather than a flat surface. 6pp.
268a. The Double Slit Experiment.A simple mechanical explanation of the single photon problem and the detector problem. 7pp.
268b. The Stark Effect. Not only do I show charge field causes of both the shift and the split, I show a new cause of spectral lines—one that has nothing to do with electron orbitals. 40pp.
269. Unifying the Photon with other Quanta.Showing that the photon is another spin level of the fundamental quantum. Also, I calculate a mass for the photon. 7p.
296b. Solid Light? NO. While analyzing the recent paper from Princeton, I explain high-temperature superconduction mechanically, including showing the physical cause of the Meissner Effect. This destroys BCS and RVB theory, Cooper pairs, polaritons, dimer math, and the rest of the fudged pseudo-explanations of solid-state physics. 30pp.
296c. Dark Matter Detection?No, just more desperation from the mainstream. I show the axion is another fake particle, created to hide the charge field. 5pp.
306a. The Photon Spin is Real.We go to the University of Glasgow for indication the orbital angular momentum of the photon is a real spin. 2pp.
306b. An Argument for the Photon.A brief look at the unquantum model, showing that new experiments refute mainstream photon theory, but not the photon itself. 5pp.
309a. Rainbows, Prisms, and non-edge Diffraction.Part 2 of my rainbow papers, where I show the color split using the unified field. Including analysis of Goethe’s theory of color. 20pp.
323. The Nuclear Shell Model of Wigner.How this model fails, and why my model is superior. With a mechanical explanation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle. 7pp.
329. Period Fourof the periodic table, where I analyze the nuclear structure of many important metals. 20pp.
330. Period Sixof the periodic table, where I analyze the Lathanides and the elements around them, showing an important variant nuclear structure. 22pp.
331a. The Great Methane Stink.I show how Methane is created, disproving electron orbital theory once again. 12pp.
331b. Graphene. Where we see all the mainstream explanations are wrong. Why? Because they are based on electron bonding theory, which is a fudge from the first word. 10pp.
332. Diatomic Hydrogen.My new charge bonding explains this much better than electron sharing. Plus an analysis of spin isomers. 9pp.
333. Deuterium and Tritium.I show the nuclear diagrams for these, as well as for heavy water. 20pp.
334a. The Phosphorus-Hydrogen Bond.Scientists recently admitted positive Phosphorus bonds to positive Hydrogen, and I show you why. The continued destruction of electron bonding theory, with nuclear diagrams. 33pp.
336. The Gas Discharge Lamp.Or, why Noble Gasses make good lamps. A better theory, using nuclear charge channeling rather than electron orbitals. 27pp.
337. Hollow Neon Atoms?New experiments are more proof of charge channeling, not of hollow atoms. 9pp.
338. The Neutron.A closer look at the charge profile of the neutron, confirming repulsion. 3pp.
339. Is Helium4 a Boson? No.A long analysis of bosons, fermions, spin-statistics, and superfluidity. 12pp.
340. The Fourth Phase of Water, part 1.I look at Gerald Pollack’s book, analyzing polywater, the exclusion zone, and charge channeling. 15pp.
343. The Magnetic Moments of Proton, Neutron, and Electron.I show how the magnetic moments are caused mechanically, using the recycled charge field. I then show how to calculate them from first principles, and to calculate one from the other. 7pp.
SECTION 10: OTHER MAINSTREAM MISTAKES
344. String Theory: the Inelegant Universe.A Critique of String Theory and M-theory using Brian Greene’s book The Elegant Universe as my text, including a foundational correction to the 11-dimensional math. 14pp.
346. Zeno’s Paradoxes.A short paper on Zeno’s various paradoxes showing, among other things, that I am not opposed to limits or infinities in mathematics or in physics when they are used properly. 6pp.
347. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.Commentary in passing on Kurt Godel, including analysis of Karl Popper, Bertrand Russell, and others. 6pp.
348. Why Noether’s Theorem is a Tautology.A short proof of Noether’s Theorem by algebraic means, showing that symmetries are equivalent to conservation laws. This contradicts the current interpretation that symmetries are primary. 2pp.
349. Entropy.A refining of the concept of entropy, and a rebuttal to the current conceptions of order. 5pp.
350. What is π?Here I show that π is a centripetal acceleration and that the circumference of any circle has complex dimensions. 6pp.
351. The Extinction of π.Here I show that the true value of π, defined as the ratio of circumference to diameter, is 4. 15pp.
353c. More on the Running Track.This is to clarify my recent addendum to my paper on pi=4. I show that both the distances and velocities are being miscalculated in the curves on normal running tracks. 6pp.
358. Does Size Matter?The first entry in a new section answering readers’ questions. Here I answer a question about the ratio of volume to surface area changing with size. 3pp.
359. Why do Stars Twinkle?A new answer to this question and some commentary on the old answer. 6pp.
361. Squaring the Circle.Here I show various operational inconsistencies in claiming that the circle cannot be squared “with a straight edge and compass.” 12pp.
377b. They Finally Retire the Stephen Hawking Impostor. You probably know Hawking “died” recently, but unless you are in the UK, you may not know that two months earlier The Daily Mail in London reported on my outing of him as a fake. 3pp.
386. Time and the Photon.I address the question, “If a photon doesn’t experience time, how does it travel?” showing the mainstream answer is wrong. 5pp.
387. Is Time an Illusion? NO.We look at recent magazine articles to find more misdirection in physics. 33pp.
400. Jack Parsons and JPL.Where we look at the foundations of the Jet Propulsion Lab and Aerojet. 20pp.
7,275 pp. total. 1/1/2019. This total page count was recently revised to reflect the large size of a PDF page, which is about 3 times larger than a standard book page. Not all papers are listed above. See updates for papers not on this list.
stock here. I have covered this issue before, it wasn’t on my radar until the last few years. All the press gives them a pass, all except alternative media. It’s #FaF
Ruby was certainly informed about the precise moment when Oswald would be transferred from the Dallas Police Station to the County Jail. According to former British Intelligence Officer Colonel John Hughes-Wilson, it was Sam Bloom, the Jewish chairman of the “host committee” who had invited Kennedy to Dallas, who suggested to the Police “that they move the alleged assassin [Oswald] from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail in order to give the newsmen a good story and pictures.” And “when the police later searched Ruby’s home, they found a slip of paper with Bloom’s name, address and telephone number on it.”31
In an apparent attempt to make it impossible for him to fulfill his contract, Ruby tried to warn the Dallas Police anonymously: Lieutenant Billy Grammer, a dispatcher for the Dallas Police Department, whose statement can be heard here, received an anonymous phone call at 3 a.m. on November 24 from a man who knew Grammer’s name. The caller told Grammer that he knew of the plan to move Oswald from the basement and that unless the plans for Oswald’s transfer were changed, “we are going to kill him.” After Oswald was shot, Grammer, who knew Ruby and had found the voice familiar at the time of the call, identified Ruby as the caller.32
stock here: this highly promoted tweet, got 1.5M views….that means the Cabal really pushed it out there.
It is a blatant attempt to create division and hatred. Everyone not Hawaiian is labelled a law breaking outside….probably non-vaxxed too OMG!~!! The Horror.
And Yahoo has turned off the comments to “improve the community experience”.
The play the “safety card” and the “top secret military comms card
There are ZERO consequences that are negative to anyone, because some non-Sheep have the guts to ignore stupid rules and enjoy nature
Haven’t seen these in years. Running the HEPA filters for sure. Will also do a few Geiger runs.
Had to remove a Doxing comment from Jay Cullen, you know U Vic asshole who went on attack against Dana Dunford for doing independent research et al, it is an accurate IP address for his University.
Several attempts here to post pictures of the chemtrails were not effective….I have a work around, my Blogger site that has not been censored…..yet. Note to self, back that site up also!!
It’s time to revisit the coverage of Kyle Rittenhouse. With the news that he has been acquitted on all counts, don’t forget the ways that Dems and the corporate press came together to craft a false narrative in his case. Let’s break down how we got here1:12 PM · Nov 19, 2021·Twitter for iPhone9,068 Retweets1,674 Quote Tweets25.2K Likes
There is a lot that could be written on this story. Its #FaF. It Doesn’t really make sense. Heavy, which is Cabal controlled propaganda, actually did a pretty good writeup, for starts at least.
stock here: I am curious about the week of deliberations, and ending on Friday. I guess that means a full weekend to hire the BLM thugs back and burn some shit down. We shall see. My fear was the start of riots and the national guard ambushed as they try to mobilize. “On call” is quite different than being “in place” as they should have been.
On the above article, saw this race baiting comment, and said response.
Why have gun laws if they are not consistently enforced? Who acquired the weapon for Kyle, who transported the kid to the protest, why didn’t the cops immediately arrest him but instead gave him water and sent him home (only to be arrested the next day)?
I suspect if Kyle were black the police interactions would be quite different.
ef off race baiter. You have not done even the most basic research on gun laws. And the transporting bullshit, like you want charges against his mom, or did you not even research that. You bakas of low research, acting out of feeling –that are also wrong, are a serious problem this country faces, you are so easily swayed by the mainsteam narrative. He was a lifeguard in Kenosha, his job was there and his father was there. The allegations of who “acquired” the rifle for him hints at a “straw purchase” of which it was nothing of the sort, he borrowed the long rifle from a friend in Kenosha. Shameful shame on you.
Below the Embed, is a link that is Thread Reader App showing a dozen of the ignorant race baiting jag off that may actually believe they are doing reporting.
Sigh…..we have to be happy that finally, obvious justice is done.
Reporter asks if President Trump condemns the actions of Kyle Rittenhouse, the teen charged for killing two protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
Deaths from Jab USA, and Orange Reported as “Foreign”
After We Discovered and Reported That Certain Batches Were Being Widely Distributed to Many States, Logistically Hard, and Why Would anyone Do this? And Certain Batches were killing Hundreds Reported…..shortly After That, The VAERS Reports Started Listing Almost All The Deaths as Foreign.
