stock here: SNAP Funding Helps Walmart, Walmart Helps Kamala Harris and the Democrat machine overall. Great reason to re-organize SNAP.
We lost 140,000 farms in USA in 5 years.
🚨 TOTAL DISASTER: SNAP Cuts EXPOSED — How Walmart & the Government are screwing you pic.twitter.com/pVMJ3rHdEL
— HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) May 22, 2025
stock here, Hustle Bitch is really Hustling
"I can't tell who's crazier these days. The mental patients sent to us by every third world hellhole on the planet or a homegrown George Soros funded terrorists, Antifa."
— HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) May 6, 2025
"They've got little trash can riot shields, very gay looking, very unathletic, very unlovable." pic.twitter.com/K1vsTsxlY3
Biden Admitted in 2022 That He Had Cancer?
Is this real? As much as I hate Chrome, it is my go-to as I can’t watch much of X on Firefox.
Back in 2022 Biden admitted he had cancer but no one took him seriously pic.twitter.com/DgHGYi5Hcu
— HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) May 18, 2025
They sacked him, LOL, Consider buying his book
From 2009 to 2012, the NRC Chairman was Dr. Gregory B. Jaczko. Appointed by President Barack Obama, Jaczko had previously served as a Commissioner since 2005. During his tenure, he emphasized strengthening nuclear safety regulations, particularly in the aftermath of the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in Japan. Notably, he was the sole dissenting vote against the construction of new reactors at the Vogtle plant in Georgia, citing safety concerns stemming from the Fukushima incident.
Wikipedia
Jaczko’s approach often put him at odds with other commissioners and industry stakeholders. In 2011, an NRC inspector general report highlighted concerns about his management style, including allegations of creating an intimidating work environment. These internal conflicts, combined with his regulatory stance, led to mounting pressure. On May 21, 2012, Jaczko announced his resignation, stating he would step down upon the confirmation of his successor.
Wikipedia
+4
Following his departure from the NRC, Jaczko became an outspoken critic of nuclear energy. In his 2019 memoir, Confessions of a Rogue Nuclear Regulator, he detailed his experiences at the NRC and expressed concerns about the safety and viability of nuclear power.
House Oversight Committee
Jaczko’s tenure and subsequent advocacy have been subjects of debate, reflecting broader discussions about nuclear energy’s role in the U.S. energy landscape.
stock here: Originally this blog started as Nuke Pimp, because you really had to be a pimp to sell anything that dirty. Then the DOE scientist found my site, his moniker was Loose Nuke on ENE, and somehow I changed it to Nukepro. What a time that was, the more I dug into it, the more I detested the industry and the regulators. Who was that chief regulator who was going to make massive changes, like RFK Jr now, and ended up getting sacked pretty quickly….yes that was the NRC Dr Gregory Jaczko.
But the lies of nuke have barely changed, maybe even worse, this from Fukushimainform…..why don’t y’all drop some comments there.
Cosmic and Soil are really the other parts of that diagram that are “natural” and that comes to about 2mSv per year. But the lie is to juice up the total to be 6mSv per year or so. The Radon is easily controlled with a fan and some 3″ PVC piping. Note that radiation from Nuke plants is not even mentioned.
LOL and the Food Diagram……Banana’s and Fish, like you should just expect radiation in Fish, “its natural” LOL. And we all know the lies about the “Banana equivalent dose”, I have heard that from 2 dental helpers, who of course I educated. Bottom line, the radioactive potassium in banana ahs absolutely zero effect on the radiation in your body, no matter how many banana you eat, since potassium is tightly regulated in your body, all excess i
stock here: that was just brutal, talk about making a point. And they played enough of the calls for death at many different venues, so no one could pretend that this was a “one off” event. Kind of felt bad for the guy, but hey, it’s his country, so some leadership to fix this, or else just admit you are ok with it, and therefore complicit.
Just brutal, turn down the lights, like watching a movie in grade school, and let me show you the genocide against white people going on in your country, white farmers. How about we take the Chinese owned farm land in USA, and give these migrant farmers some zero interest loans for 10 years in order to start small farming operations here. Use this to promote soil development through composting and use a lot less chemicals and chemical /oil derived fertilizers….
But we would be hypocrites to ignore the other genocides going on. Is that the master plan of the globalists….to have world wide genocides all at once, to usher in a new “way”. Or maybe it’s not their plan, but their “parting shot” as they have lost and are being shown the door, AND no more easy money from USA NGO’s and direct grants.
Come to think of it, isn’t Zelensky actually genociding his own country? I mean, we all knew that is how it was going to turn out.
And now the ones that we cannot criticize….hey Bibi. But also noted, Hamas does act violent, brutal, even seems to enjoy to death and pain of others. That whole mid-east area is trouble, and maybe that is by plan too.
stock here: we covered this in detail. It was a very poorly designed ship. The claims that it was unsinkable were bordering on reckless endangerment.
Giovanni Costantino said, “The ship was an unsinkable ship. I say it, I repeat it.” Costantino is a despicable person defending an “unsinkable” sailing yacht with a very low downflooding angle of 42 degrees. 42 degrees is at best a rum palace suitable for coastal cruising. And they didn’t dare to put the number in the stability booklet, instead they marketed the yacht as an ocean cruiser so no one knew how bad and dangerous it was. An angle of 70.6 degrees of vanishing stability is a joke for a yacht marketed as an ocean going yacht
stock here: when I first saw the videos, it seemed clear to me that the workers running away, knew exactly how construction methods were being cheated on. But 74 were killed, no idea the death count was so high.
stock here: I was going to do this….but she did it….also Synopsis under the video, and full text.
Summary of Squirrel Tribe Commentary on GOP Medicaid Plan
The Squirrel Tribe video covers reactions to recent social media statements by Senator Chuck Schumer, who criticized a GOP Medicaid proposal that he claims could result in 1.5 million New Yorkers losing coverage and cost local healthcare systems billions. The speaker aims to investigate the actual content of the proposal without political bias.
Key components of the GOP plan:
Work Requirements: Adults aged 19–64 would need to work, volunteer, or participate in education programs for at least 80 hours/month to retain Medicaid eligibility. Exemptions include pregnant women, disabled persons, and caregivers.
Eligibility Verification: More frequent income checks to ensure only qualified individuals remain on Medicaid.
Cost Sharing: States can impose co-pays for individuals above 100% of the federal poverty level, capped at 5% of income.
Provider Tax Limits: No new taxes on healthcare providers; existing taxes frozen.
Funding Restrictions: Medicaid funding would be barred for facilities providing abortions or gender transition procedures for minors.
Savings Targets: Expected to save $715 billion from Medicaid and ACA reforms, with an estimated 8.6 million fewer people insured by 2034.
The speaker supports work requirements and eligibility checks, arguing that fewer enrollees would help ensure better funding for those truly in need.
Clarification is also given between Medicaid (state-federal aid for low-income individuals) and Medicare (federal aid for seniors and those with disabilities). The speaker ends by recommending Chapter Medicare as a resource for optimizing Medicare plans.
The tone is casual but informative, seeking to educate viewers while criticizing what the speaker sees as misleading political outrage.
———————–
Full Transcript
So I wanted to bring you a little bit of information about what he is currently going off about on social media, specifically the platform X. This is what he had to say. This was just yesterday. He posted this up less than 24 hours ago. He says the GOP plan to gut Medicaid could kick 1.5 million New Yorkers off health insurance and rip 13.5 billion from local New York hospitals and healthcare every single year. That’s what New York Republicans are preparing to steal from New Yorkers to fund their billionaire tax cuts.
And I was like, “Oh, I mean that sounds bad, right? To do all that to New Yorkers.” So I wanted to find out if this is actually exactly what Chuck Schumer and a lot of other Democrats are trying to convince the people of the United States of America that is actually happening. So I asked some questions.
Now first I do want to remind everybody that there is a difference between Medicare and Medicaid, which we will get into in just a little bit. But the GOP’s Medicaid plan—I wanted to know exactly what it is and take out all the political bias: not left, not right, not even independent, just no political bias whatsoever. I want the meat and potatoes of what this whole thing is.
So the House Republican plan for Medicaid, as outlined in recent proposals, focuses on reducing federal spending by approximately $880 billion over a decade to offset tax cuts and other priorities. Now, this is what’s important—these are the key components, because I feel like everybody should know this. Whether you’re on Medicaid or not, you could need Medicaid at some point in your life—you just never know. So it’s always a good idea to kind of have some sort of information or knowledge or understanding about what’s going on, right?
So this is what they are proposing. They are saying that there should be work requirements. Basically, adults ages 19 to 64 would need to work. Already I’m kind of like, okay, that makes sense, right? Says they would need to work, volunteer, or participate in educational programs for at least 80 hours per month to maintain eligibility for Medicaid. Exemptions apply for pregnant women, people with disabilities, caregivers of dependent children, and others. Implementation is set for January 2029.
I would also like to point that out: January 2029. So Chuck Schumer is all up in his feelings right now and all over social media screaming from the top of his lungs about this whole entire thing—and it’s not even set until 2029. Technically, President Trump will no longer be in office in 2029. The reason I think that they are so upset about this and so worried about this is because I feel like they know that a Democrat president following behind President Trump is almost impossible—that there will be another Republican president after our current administration is over.
Because what they have for options as a Democrat president and vice president right now—what do you got? You got Gavin Newsom—nobody wants that. People in California would never vote for him, and California is one of the largest states—they would never vote for him. You have AOC—no. She’s a bartender at heart, that’s really all she’s good for. Nobody’s voting for AOC. You have Tim Walz—he pretty much shot himself in the foot the first time he walked out on the stage and waved at people. He’s done. Nobody wants him. Kamala Harris running again? It seems like even the Democrats aren’t that dumb. There’s no way they would put her on a ballot again. It’s not even going to happen.
And then really, what do you have left? Unless somebody comes out of the woodwork in the next year or two to start really pushing their name into the hat for Democrat president or even Democrat vice president, there’s nobody. Whereas with Republicans, you have plenty of names out there—plenty of options.
So the other thing that they are saying—these are the key components that you guys should know about. Eligibility verification: more frequent and rigorous income checks to ensure only eligible individuals remain enrolled, which is extremely important. You don’t want people on Medicaid who are out there making a ton of money, spending a ton of money, and yet you have your state funds and some federal funds paying them to live a lifestyle that they could do on their own without needing Medicaid, right?
So that one makes sense to me as well. Then they’re saying cost sharing is another key component. States would impose co-pays or out-of-pocket costs for Medicaid enrollees with incomes above 100% of the federal poverty level, capped at 5% of a patient’s income.
Then you have provider tax limits. Here it says the plan restricts states from increasing or imposing new taxes on health care providers—examples being hospitals and nursing homes—which are used to draw federal Medicaid funds. Current taxes are frozen. There will be no change there.
And then there’s funding restrictions. It would ban federal Medicaid payments to facilities like Planned Parenthood that perform abortions and prohibits coverage of gender transition procedures for minors.
If you have a problem with that, there’s already something wrong with you. Let’s just be completely upfront about that. If you have a problem with them not wanting federal money or state-provided money to pay for a child to have gender reassignment, then okay. Or you think that it’s wrong that the state doesn’t pay for your abortion—there’s already so many things wrong with you it’s ridiculous.
Then savings targets: the House Energy and Commerce Committees aim to save $715 billion from Medicaid and Affordable Care Act changes, with additional savings from energy policy reforms. Now, the Congressional Budget Office estimates these changes could result in 8.6 million fewer people insured by 2034—which is 9 years away—with $912 billion in total federal savings.
The plan avoids deeper structural changes like per capita caps or reduced federal matching rates for Medicaid expansion, which were considered but not included.
For there to be 8.6 million fewer people on Medicaid, it means that right now there are 8.6 million people that should not be on Medicaid. There are too many people on Medicaid, and just like supply and demand, when you have so many people on this, it makes it hard for the money to actually be there for the people who need it. If you had fewer people on this but the same budget, there’s going to be more coverage for people who are on it.
At least that’s how I think it should go—or would go. But the fact is, we as a country and each individual state are hemorrhaging money on people who don’t need it because they have found ways to milk the system or work around the system or find loopholes in the system. Normally, I’m all for a good loophole if it can help you save money or whatever else—but not at the cost of screwing over my brothers and sisters, my neighbors, my other citizens. I’m not okay with that.
So this is a huge deal. I think that the GOP Medicaid plan is something that the Democrats loathe, but the Republicans are obviously all for. Well, maybe not all—there are some RINOs in play, right? But I don’t see anything wrong with having work requirements. I don’t see anything wrong with eligibility verifications. I think they’re saying they want to do two a year instead of one a year or something like that—okay, that makes sense to me. I feel like the same thing should happen with anything that is government money funded for somebody. You should have to show and prove that you should be able to be on whatever program it is or however much money that you’re getting. It’s only fair.
A lot of people don’t like the word fair, but unfortunately it does matter—that word does matter. So there’s that.
Now, the difference between Medicare and Medicaid—let’s jump into that real quick. Now obviously, a lot of y’all already know the difference between Medicare and Medicaid, but there are some newcomers who might not know the difference. I know in the beginning I was not aware that Medicare and Medicaid were two totally different things, because I wasn’t on either of them. I’m not on either of them. So it’s been a learning game for me as well.
So Medicare and Medicaid—two totally different beasts. They are both technically federal programs but not exactly the same.
Medicaid is a joint federal-state program that provides health insurance primarily for low-income individuals, families, pregnant women, children, and people with disabilities. Eligibility and benefits vary by state. Obviously, that’s why some people move to certain states depending on what they need from their Medicaid. They will move where it’s going to benefit them the most. And it covers a broad range of services including hospital care, doctor visits, and long-term care with minimal or no cost to enrollees.
Which is again another reason why this GOP Medicaid thing that they’re trying to make some tweaks to—to save $880 billion over the next 10 years—makes sense, because the people who are on Medicaid generally speaking have minimal or no cost to themselves, and so it is coming from the state, from federal, and things like that.
Medicare is a federal program. It’s not state-based. It provides health insurance mainly for people aged 65 and older, as well as some younger individuals with disabilities or specific conditions like end-stage renal disease. It has four parts: A, B, C, and D—which we’ve covered numerous times. These cover hospital insurance, medical insurance, Medicare Advantage plans, and prescription drug coverage, respectively. Beneficiaries often pay premiums, deductibles, and co-pays—so it’s a little different than Medicaid, whereas Medicaid more or less covers everything for you. Medicare—you do have to pay your own way on a lot of these things.
Now the programs overlap for some individuals known as dual eligibles, who qualify for both Medicaid and Medicare. For these people, Medicaid may cover costs that Medicare doesn’t—like long-term care or Medicare premiums—depending on state rules. There are about 12 million people that are dual eligibles, mostly low-income seniors or people with disabilities. And again, what they’re trying to do with Medicaid right now could knock some of those people off, because it’ll determine if they need to be dual Medicare and Medicaid or if they only need Medicare and don’t warrant being on Medicaid.
Right now, I don’t have any information on how to get Medicaid for you guys because it’s all state-based. But Medicare, being a federal program—I do partner with Chapter. I don’t know if you guys have been here before and heard me speak about Chapter, but Chapter Medicare will help you guys out immensely with figuring out if you are on the best plan for yourselves—whether it’s A, B, C, or D—or if there’s tweaks that can be made to get you into a better plan. Whether it will save you money or it’ll get you into a better doctor or someplace like that, it’s worth calling. It is free to call.
I’m going to show you guys the number right now. Here you go. The phone number is 513-898-3528. Like I said, it is a free phone call. It can take all of 2 minutes; it can take an hour. It just kind of depends on what your situation is and what they really need to dive into. But everybody that has called so far has given phenomenal feedback on, one, the customer service—because to me, customer service is huge. If you’re going to call someplace, you want somebody on the other end of the line who’s going to give half a crap about why you’re calling and really want to help you. And so far, every single person I have spoken to has said that Chapter Medicare definitely is that. They give a crap about what you are going through, what you need, and they will do everything they can to help you find the best plan—whether it is changing one or changing two or whatever else.
So if you’re in the Medicare realm, I always say it’s worth calling. Because again, it’s a free phone call just to see if where you are is where you should be or maybe if there’s some place that might be better for you in the Part A, B, C, or D realm. And then when it’s time to make changes, that’s up to you if you want to do so or not. Again, free phone call—a couple minutes out of your life that may save you money. Worth doing.
So anyway, Squirrel Tribe—hopefully this information was helpful, beneficial, enjoyable—I don’t know. But at the end of the day, what matters most is: I love you guys, and I hope you guys have a fabulous day. And I’ll see you on the next one. Bye.
NOTUS is a “non-profit” but they have not filed their 2024 — oh wait…after I gave AI their EIN, it was able to find something. See far bottom.
They definitely are lead by lefty goals…..3 Men, 4 Blacks, 14 Total in this photo.
28% Black (or double the population %)
79% Female — Nuff Said
21% Black Female, roughly Triple the population %
Allbritton Journalism Institute Fellowships
Every September, AJI welcomes a cohort of 10 early-career reporters to D.C. for a two-year fellowship. Fellows are paid $60,000 per year to take classes with some of the country’s best journalists and to write for AJI’s publication, NOTUS, where they work alongside a staff of established reporters and editors to cover politics, policy and government.
Population(s) Served
Ethnic and racial groups
Veterans
LGBTQ people
Women and girls
—————————————
They are proud of their “Donor TRansparency Policy” but except for these names, you cannot find anything on who is donating how much.
We offer special thanks to our donors, and invite you to review our donor transparency policy here.
—————– you can email them
hmmmm…this looks fishy #FaF
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) 92-3567967 corresponds to the Allbritton Journalism Institute, which operates the nonprofit news organization NOTUS. According to their 2024 IRS Form 990 filing, the organization reported the following financial information:
GuideStar
Revenue: $409,448, entirely from contributions.
Expenses: $129,541.
Net Income: $279,907.
Total Assets: $306,544.
Total Liabilities: $0.
Net Assets: $306,544.
ProPublica
+1
ProPublica
+1
The Form 990 also lists key personnel and their compensation:
Steve Baker (Executive Director): $20,000.
Stanley Healy (Board Chair): $0.
Lynne D. Jones (Treasurer): $0.
Teresa Webster (Board Member): $0.
Richard Raulstone (Board Member): $0.
David Novak (Board Member): $0.
For more detailed information, you can view the full Form 990 on ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer:
ProPublica
.
ProPublica
+2
ProPublica
+2
ProPublica
+2
Additionally, the Allbritton Journalism Institute’s profile on GuideStar may provide further insights:
GuideStar
.
GuideStar
If you’re interested in specific details such as donor names or grant sizes, these are typically found in Schedule B of the Form 990. However, for 501(c)(3) organizations, donor names are generally redacted in public disclosures. To access unredacted information, you may need to submit a formal request to the organization or consult the IRS directly.
stock here: 1,100 pages, A-Eye summary
Notice the Guardian, using a photo from AP, using uplighting to especially make President look bad. It’s the first time I have seen it, an intentional use of uplighting. Shameful. Photographer is Rod Lamkey of AP
Note the comments, I wonder how many of these are bots?
President Trump after meeting with @HouseGOP: "Why don't we see how the vote is? I think it was a great talk…I think we have unbelievable unity. I think we're going to get everything we want. I think we're going to have a great victory." pic.twitter.com/mHMcHm1TBz
— CSPAN (@cspan) May 20, 2025
———————–
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is a comprehensive legislative proposal introduced by President Donald Trump in 2025. Spanning over 1,100 pages, the bill aims to consolidate various policy initiatives, including tax reforms, spending cuts, and immigration enforcement measures. It has garnered significant attention and sparked debates within Congress and among the public.
Key Provisions of the Bill
Tax Reforms
Extension of 2017 Tax Cuts: The bill seeks to make permanent the individual and estate tax cuts enacted in 2017, which are set to expire at the end of 2025.
Elimination of Taxes on Specific Incomes: It proposes eliminating federal income taxes on tips and overtime pay, benefiting service industry and hourly workers.
Tax Relief for Seniors: An additional $4,000 deduction is introduced for middle- and low-income seniors.
Auto Loan Interest Deduction: Interest on loans for American-made vehicles would become tax-deductible.
Child Tax Credit Increase: The child tax credit would temporarily increase from $2,000 to $2,500 through 2028.
MAGA Savings Accounts: Establishment of “Money Accounts for Growth and Investment” (MAGA) accounts, providing $1,000 to children born between 2024 and 2028.
State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction Cap: The cap on SALT deductions would rise from $10,000 to $30,000 for couples, addressing concerns from lawmakers in high-tax states.
+4
Spending Cuts and Social Programs
Medicaid Reforms: Introduction of work requirements for certain recipients, increased verification processes, and higher co-pays for individuals above the poverty line.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Implementation of stricter work requirements and shifting more administrative costs to states.
Student Loan Changes: Elimination of federal direct subsidized loans for undergraduates and restrictions on existing repayment plans.
Business Insider
Immigration and Border Security
Border Wall Funding: Allocation of $46.5 billion for the construction of additional border barriers.
Immigration Enforcement: Funding to hire 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers by 2030 and expand detention facilities.
Asylum Application Fee: Imposition of a $1,000 fee on migrants seeking asylum, a first in U.S. policy.
Defense and Other Provisions
Defense Spending: An additional $150 billion allocated for defense, including investments in missile defense systems and unmanned technologies.
Debt Ceiling Increase: Proposal to raise the U.S. debt ceiling by $4 trillion.
AI Regulation: A 10-year federal preemption on state artificial intelligence laws, centralizing AI regulation at the federal level.
Political Landscape and Controversies
The bill has faced opposition from both Democrats and some Republicans:
Wikipedia
Fiscal Concerns: Critics argue that the bill could add between $3.7 trillion to $5.7 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.
Medicaid and Social Program Cuts: Some Republicans express concerns over the depth of cuts to social programs, while others believe the cuts are insufficient.
SALT Deduction Cap: Lawmakers from high-tax states like New York and California advocate for a higher SALT deduction cap, with some threatening to withhold support without adjustments.
Current Status
As of May 21, 2025, the bill has passed the House Budget Committee and is awaiting a full House vote. President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson are actively working to consolidate Republican support ahead of the vote.
stock here: MAHA — I have even taken some blood pressure medicine, after being assured from a PA friend that “that one is so low dose”, but also as a stop gap measure to get back to good cardio health and meditations, and beet root powder.
LOL reading a blood pressure “flyer” at my local medical facility “there is nothing you can do about high blood pressure, you just “treat it” (LOL with big Pharma)
But saw this “infomercial” and had AI break it down, to a large sound bite, have at it.
Here is the source “doc”
https://www.fastbpfix.com/letter_4drugs_nhc_mon
———————
✅ The 4 Blood Pressure Drugs Identified as Most Harmful
Lisinopril
Type: ACE inhibitor
Brands: Prinivil, Zestril
Concerns:
406,180 FDA complaints
Side effects include nausea, fainting, kidney failure, heart attacks
Derived from Brazilian pit viper venom
Can cause severe coughing due to byproduct “kinnins”
Metoprolol Succinate
Type: Beta blocker
Brands: Toprol XL (also many generics)
Concerns:
FDA complaints about generics (many made overseas)
Suppresses adrenaline, reducing responsiveness in emergencies
Can cause fatigue, weakness, and zombie-like feelings
Amlodipine
Type: Calcium channel blocker
Brands: Norvasc, Tekamlo, Amturnide, Caduet, Lotrel
Concerns:
Side effects: headaches, diarrhea, depression, swelling in wrists/ankles
Interferes with muscle control by dampening electrical signals
Chlorothiazide
Type: Diuretic (water pill)
Brands: Diuril, also found in Zesteretic, Losartan, Valsartan
Concerns:
Risk of muscle cramps, seizures, coma, heart arrhythmias
Depletes electrolytes critical for heart function
🔍 Summary of the Presentation
Dr. Marlene Merritt, a practitioner of Oriental Medicine and clinical nutritionist, presents a critique of pharmaceutical treatments for high blood pressure (hypertension), advocating for a natural approach instead.
⚠️ Problems with Drug-Based Treatment:
Drugs treat symptoms, not root causes.
Most blood pressure medications can cause serious side effects, especially in long-term use.
Doctors are often unaware of these side effects, as they don’t take the drugs themselves.
The low-fat diet theory that led to widespread hypertension and heart disease was based on flawed science (Dr. Ancel Keys’ “7 Countries” study).
Cholesterol and animal fat were wrongly blamed; newer evidence shows that refined vegetable oils, sugar, and additives are the real culprits.
🌿 Natural Alternatives (Highlights from The Blood Pressure Solution):
Foods that replenish nitric oxide (like beet juice) can lower BP by up to 12 points.
Nutrients in fish oil help regulate adrenaline and cortisol.
Listening to relaxing music, doing simple exercises, and avoiding inflammatory foods reduce hypertension naturally.
Embrace natural fats like butter, cheese, and meats — and avoid “low-fat” products loaded with sugar and chemicals.
📘 What’s Offered:
The Blood Pressure Solution program/book for $47 (down from $150), including:
A holistic step-by-step plan
Diet tips, food lists, recipes, label guides
Phone & website support
5 bonus guides, including:
“99 Foods That Lower Blood Pressure”
“7-Day Meal Plan & Recipes”
“How to Monitor Blood Pressure at Home”
💡 Key Message:
You can reverse hypertension by:
Removing the foods that cause inflammation
Eating whole, natural foods with healthy fats
Engaging in gentle activity and reducing stress
This path avoids the side effects of long-term medication and targets the underlying causes, not just the symptoms.
stock here: It may be the drag of the water on this relatively lightweight earth, but I am having trouble reconciling conservation of angular momentum on this process. I would need a better model, either a much heavier “Earth” and or a support mechanism with minimal drag, like a support layer of moving air.
Periodic polarity reversal on our planet is a fact that scientists have long known, but its mechanism has not been explained yet. In my opinion, the reversal of magnetic poles is caused by a physical rotation of the iron core of the Earth under a strong magnetic pulse from the Sun.
The polar shift made Earth slow down its rotation and start a motion in the opposite direction, like today – from the west to the east. At first only the core turned 180 ° in the meridional direction.
Only the core performed the full up-down rotation and due to this it apparently began to rotate in the other direction /the mass was rotating in the same direction all the time/. The mantle and the crust due to the slip made smaller meridional shifts – 80˚ and 30˚, respectively.
Then the rotation of the core – in “the opposite direction” began to move to the mantle and the crust. And again, there was a slip on the edges of the layers. The mantle and the crust slowly inhibited rotation and resumed it in line with the core movement.
And very important notice: There were two events:
1/ 12,900 years ago /10.900 BC/ – asteroid impact in Greenland /probably one of several places of impact/
2/ 11,700 years ago / 9.700 BC/ – solar blast and catastrophic shift on the Earth /showed in this film/
Between this events there was period called Younger Dryas.
————–
Here is another one…..
stock here: Chime in, this effect is real and we need to expand on this.
I have a theory about “the normies” it’s a strong desire to follow the mainstream (lying media and hollywood) narratives in all ways. They insist on staying inside the Overton window, and near the center, not even the edges. It may be a reaction to the enormous information available in today’s world and an attempt to simplify it. It may also be related to the widespread evil that is being exposed, such as sexual blackmail at high levels of government and industry, that has basically become a “business”. People just don’t want to wrap their heads around that = Normie
LOL I’ll link to this treatise on “Five Lies To Believe Before Breakfast”, why can’t we all just be cheerful!
I’ll add in said link when I can circle back.
The Stormer IS an extreme site. He gets carried away with loosely throwing “nigger” around more than is justified, and loves to just call out “The Jews” without further identifying as Zionists or Crypto-Jews (fake Jews that are assholes all by themselves but hide under the protection of the Jew lable). Not all the Jews are bad people, some are very spiritual, insightful, even “given knowledge”. He does an article on this article by: David Sims
https://dailystormer.in/dave-sims-essay-tangent-full-text
And here is the Stormer article, which is almost as long as the article he mentions.
https://dailystormer.in/on-dave-sims-2001-anti-feminist-treatise
5hEdited
Blue team repeatedly fails at framing Red team members with crimes. Red team fails to arrest known Blue team traitors. Perhaps the Red team is just the Blue team wearing the Red uniform. 💁🏻♂️
BREAKING: Disgraced FBI Director Will Be Taken By Secret Service To Washington As Part Of Their Investigation Into His Call For Trump To Be Assassinated
stock here: last post before Uber to airport. She’s 65, Obese, Not Retired, and likely convinced she is doing something good for the world. Airplane reading the whole thing!
Here's the new indictment posted in the federal criminal case of Milwaukee-area judge Hannah Dugan, whose arrest was announced last month by FBI Director Kash Patel
— Scott MacFarlane (@MacFarlaneNews) May 14, 2025
Court hearing tomorrow pic.twitter.com/o6vPY1lXkl
stock here: my last post for a while, I start my new life in new location tomorrow.
In the meantime, enjoy the many rabbit holes at this other Cuttlefish site.
stock here, some backgrounder? I called out the assault on injections of mRNA into pregnant women as it happened. I forget the details now, but the process was “sold” through a nefarious setup of propaganda and fear mongering. I had a few female friends (bank / stores / Starbucks) in mid / early 2021who were pregnant, and I advised them of the risks and as far as I know they did not get injected, and all now have healthy babies / toddlers now.
Dr. Mike Yeadon Comments on “The mRNA-based pseudo-“vaccines” destroy over 60% of non-renewable egg supply of female rats.” by Suavek
But let’s Review the Debacle of the 1960’s.
The statement:
“Since thalidomide in the early 1960s, all new medical interventions have been considered as presumptive reproductive toxins”
Reflects a regulatory and ethical shift in how new drugs and medical treatments are evaluated for safety, especially regarding pregnancy and fetal development.
🔬 Background: The Thalidomide Disaster
Thalidomide was a sedative introduced in the late 1950s and widely used by pregnant women to treat nausea and insomnia.
It was marketed as safe — even for pregnancy — but was never tested adequately on pregnant animals or for reproductive toxicity.
Result: Between 10,000 and 20,000 babies worldwide were born with severe birth defects, especially malformed limbs (phocomelia).
The disaster was a major turning point in drug regulation and public awareness of teratogenic (birth-defect-causing) risks.
🧪 Impact on Regulation
In response:
Regulatory agencies like the FDA (USA), EMA (Europe), and others tightened requirements.
All new drugs are now presumed to be reproductive toxins unless proven otherwise.
Developers must conduct specific reproductive toxicology studies before approval:
Fertility studies
Embryo-fetal development studies (in animals)
Pre- and post-natal development studies
This precautionary approach is sometimes described as “guilty until proven innocent” for reproductive safety.
🧠 Broader Ethical and Clinical Implications
Pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials — creating a data gap that can hinder informed treatment decisions.
This can lead to under-treatment of pregnant individuals out of fear, even when a drug might be safe or necessary.
It also influenced the development of pregnancy category labeling (e.g., the old FDA categories A, B, C, D, X — now replaced with detailed labeling).
⚖️ Summary
The thalidomide tragedy led to a precautionary paradigm:
All new drugs and interventions are assumed to carry reproductive risk until sufficient evidence shows otherwise.
This has improved safety but also introduced complexities in balancing risk and benefit, especially in pregnant populations.
Would you like a list of how different countries classify reproductive toxicity today or how this affects vaccine development?
stock here, news article
Remember Kenny Boy Buesseler?
Yes, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego has been involved in monitoring oceanic radiation levels following the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. While Scripps did not lead the primary radiation monitoring efforts, it collaborated with other institutions to study the dispersion of radioactive materials in the Pacific Ocean.
Scripps’ Involvement in Fukushima Radiation Monitoring
Collaborative Research Cruises: In June 2011, researchers from Scripps participated in an international research cruise led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). The team collected water samples and studied ocean currents to assess the spread of radioactive isotopes from Fukushima. Melissa Miller from Scripps was among the scientists retrieving samples during this expedition.
Phys.org
+4
Maritime Executive
+4
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
+4
Atmospheric Monitoring: Researchers at Scripps also monitored atmospheric radiation levels. In March 2011, they detected a spike in radioactive sulfur in the air over La Jolla, California, which was attributed to emissions from the Fukushima plant. This finding provided insights into the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere during the disaster.
EarthSky
Funding and Support
It’s important to note that much of the oceanic radiation monitoring post-Fukushima was not funded by U.S. federal agencies. Instead, researchers relied on alternative funding sources:
Crowd-Funded Citizen Science: Ken Buesseler of WHOI initiated a crowd-funded program called “Our Radioactive Ocean,” engaging the public in collecting seawater samples along the West Coast and Hawaii. This initiative filled the gap left by the absence of federal funding for coastal radiation monitoring.
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
+6
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
+6
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
+6
Private Foundation Grants: Buesseler also secured a $4 million grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation to support research cruises and analyses related to Fukushima radiation.
Council on Foundations
Summary
While the Scripps Institution of Oceanography was not the primary organization leading Fukushima radiation monitoring, it played a collaborative role in research efforts to understand the dispersion of radioactive materials in the Pacific Ocean. These efforts were largely supported by private funding and citizen science initiatives due to the lack of federal funding for such monitoring activities.
stock here: looks like the Genocide is just beginning….
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Israel is engaged in a “seven-front war,” though he did not specify all the fronts in detail. Based on various reports and analyses, the likely fronts include:
Looks like they intend to expand quite a bit?
Gaza Strip: Ongoing conflict with Hamas, marked by military operations and significant casualties.
West Bank: Increased military activity and tensions with Palestinian groups.
Lebanon: Hostilities with Hezbollah, including cross-border attacks.
Syria: Airstrikes and operations against Iranian-backed forces and other militants.
Iraq: Concerns over Iranian-backed militias and potential threats.
Yemen: Missile and drone attacks from Houthi rebels, who are aligned with Iran.
Iran: The overarching adversary, supporting various proxy groups across the region.
These fronts represent the multifaceted security challenges Israel perceives in the region.