Category: Uncategorized

stock here: I was surprised this was pushed into my feed.

AI summary of comments, most people no longer buy it.

Summary of Comments by Category and Count

1. Opposing the Post (Skeptical of the Vaccine) Comments expressing disbelief, skepticism, or criticism of the vaccine’s safety or effectiveness:
   Example: “Wrong,” “Opposite,” “Def the opposite,” “Tell that to the athletes that’s dead today.”
   Count: 25+
2. Supporting the Vaccine Comments defending the vaccine’s safety or effectiveness:
   Example: “Life is a crap shoot. The odds are way better with the shot.”
   Count: 7+
3. Humor and Sarcasm Comments using humor, sarcasm, or irony to mock the post or its implications:
   Example: “Got my 45th booster! I feel great,” “You’re definitely a Democrat, transference.”
   Count: 10+
4. Personal Experiences (Mixed) Comments sharing personal or observed experiences with or without the vaccine:
   Positive vaccine experiences: “I got all the boosters and never feel shet when I had Covid.”
   Negative vaccine experiences: “Everyone I know who got the vaccine gets more sick.”
   Count: 12+
5. Misinformation Accusations or Conspiracy Theories Comments alleging misinformation, conspiracies, or mistrust in authorities:
   Example: “Fauci is a liar,” “There was a patent on the virus and vaccine back before 2005.”
   Count: 10+
6. Debates Between Users Heated exchanges or debates about the vaccine, often involving personal attacks or challenges to credibility:
   Example: “You should do your research so you don’t look like an idiot.”
   Count: 8+
7. Calls for Rational Discussion Comments urging for balanced or nuanced conversations about the vaccine:
   Example: “Let’s have a rational and educated discussion of vaccines.”
   Count: 3+

Key Insights

The majority of comments oppose the vaccine or the post's claims, reflecting widespread skepticism.
Personal experiences vary significantly, fueling both support and opposition.
Humor, sarcasm, and conspiracy theories are prevalent, highlighting emotional responses to the topic.
Heated debates dominate some threads, showing the divisive nature of the issue.

Would you like deeper analysis of specific comment categories or themes?

stock here: From the moment the story broke, without any details, except the engraved casings, “they” speculated that it was not just a ghost gun, but a 3D printed ghost gun. So FaF, out of the gate.

Now a new “article” claims in the headline that it definitely was a 3D printed gun and suppressor, but in the article there are only quotations of “May be”. It sure is curious.

If guns can’t be regulated by background check at point of purchase, then all guns need to be eliminated from the public. Is that there game? And so quick after this “event”, and with so many images of the suspect, with his near Kamala SEG shit eating grin?

It sure is odd.

https://web.archive.org/web/20241211195945/https://futurism.com/the-byte/ceo-shooter-pistol-silencer-3d-printed

stock here: not until this year, did I understand the the Bible was a history book, also.

The lineage of Levi, as described in the Bible, is foundational to understanding the priesthood in Israel and its connection to significant figures like Abraham and David. Here’s a breakdown:
Levi and Abraham

Levi's Lineage:
    Levi was one of the 12 sons of Jacob (Israel) and the third son born to Leah.
    Jacob, Levi's father, was the son of Isaac and the grandson of Abraham, the patriarch of the Israelites.
    This makes Levi a great-grandson of Abraham.

Abraham's Covenant:
    Abraham received God's covenant promise that his descendants would become a great nation and inherit the land of Canaan (Genesis 12, 15, 17).
    Levi, as part of this lineage, inherited this promise along with his brothers.

Levi’s Role in Israel

Levi's descendants became the Levites, who were set apart for religious duties after the Israelites were delivered from Egypt.
One of Levi's descendants, Aaron (Moses' brother), was chosen as the first high priest, establishing the Aaronic priesthood, which operated within the tribe of Levi.

Levi’s Lineage to David

David’s Ancestry:
    David is from the tribe of Judah, another son of Jacob. Judah and Levi were brothers, both sons of Jacob, making them part of the same generational family under Abraham.
    The priesthood (Levi’s lineage) and the kingship (Judah’s lineage) were thus intertwined within the broader covenant family of Abraham.

Tribal Roles:
    The Levites served as priests, assisting in the religious life of Israel, while Judah was associated with leadership and kingship.
    David, from Judah, became Israel’s greatest king, fulfilling the promise of a ruler from Judah’s line (Genesis 49:10).

Connections in Prophecy

Abraham and the Messiah:
    God promised Abraham that through his seed, all nations would be blessed (Genesis 22:18). This was ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ, who descended from David (Judah’s line) but also fulfilled the priestly role, transcending the Levitical priesthood.

David and the Messiah:
    David was promised an everlasting kingdom (2 Samuel 7:12-16). Jesus, a descendant of David, fulfills this as the eternal king.
    Though not of Levi’s line, Jesus is described in the book of Hebrews as a priest "after the order of Melchizedek," signifying a higher, eternal priesthood.

Summary of the Relationship

Abraham: Patriarch, father of Isaac and grandfather of Jacob, from whom Levi and Judah descended.
Levi: Great-grandson of Abraham, progenitor of the Levitical priesthood.
David: Descendant of Judah, Levi’s brother, and recipient of God’s promise of an eternal kingdom.
Jesus Christ: Descendant of Abraham and David (Judah’s line), fulfilling the promises of kingship and a higher priesthood.

This lineage illustrates how Abraham’s covenant threads through the priestly line of Levi and the kingly line of David, culminating in Jesus Christ as the fulfillment of both. Let me know if you’d like a deeper dive into any of these aspects!
You said:
elaborate on this
Though not of Levi’s line, Jesus is described in the book of Hebrews as a priest “after the order of Melchizedek,” signifying a higher, eternal priesthood.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The statement that Jesus is described in the book of Hebrews as a priest “after the order of Melchizedek” is a profound theological concept. It highlights a shift from the traditional Levitical priesthood (descended from Levi and Aaron) to a new, eternal priesthood that transcends the limitations of the Old Covenant.
Who is Melchizedek?

Biblical Introduction:
    Melchizedek first appears in Genesis 14:18-20 as the king of Salem (later identified as Jerusalem) and a priest of the "Most High God."
    He blesses Abraham and receives a tithe from him, indicating his superior spiritual authority.
    Melchizedek is described as both a king and a priest, which is unusual because in Israel, these two roles were typically separate.

Mystical Figure:
    His genealogy, birth, and death are not recorded in Scripture, giving him an air of timelessness.
    This lack of lineage and his unique combination of roles make him a type (foreshadowing) of Christ.

Jesus and the Order of Melchizedek

Eternal Priesthood:
    Hebrews 7:3 describes Melchizedek as "without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, resembling the Son of God, he remains a priest forever."
    Jesus, like Melchizedek, holds an eternal priesthood, unbound by lineage or the temporal limitations of the Levitical priesthood.

Superior to the Levitical Priesthood:
    Hebrews 7:4-10 explains that Abraham, the ancestor of Levi, paid tithes to Melchizedek, signifying Melchizedek’s superiority over Levi and his descendants.
    By extension, Jesus’ priesthood, modeled after Melchizedek’s, is superior to the Levitical priesthood.

Not Based on Ancestry:
    The Levitical priesthood was hereditary, passed down through Levi and Aaron.
    Jesus, from the tribe of Judah (not Levi), does not qualify for the Levitical priesthood. Instead, His priesthood is based on divine appointment and an eternal nature, as stated in Hebrews 7:11-17: "You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek."

Key Characteristics of the Melchizedekian Priesthood

Universal:
    Melchizedek was not tied to Israel; he was a priest of the "Most High God," serving all nations. Similarly, Jesus’ priesthood is universal, not restricted to a specific tribe or people.

Eternal:
    Unlike Levitical priests, who served temporarily and were replaced upon death, Jesus’ priesthood is eternal. Hebrews 7:24-25 says, "Because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood."

King and Priest:
    Melchizedek was both a king and a priest, a dual role fulfilled perfectly in Jesus, who is the King of Kings and the ultimate High Priest.

Based on Righteousness and Peace:
    Melchizedek’s name means "King of Righteousness," and he was king of Salem, meaning "peace." Jesus embodies both perfect righteousness and peace, reconciling humanity to God.

Significance in the Book of Hebrews

Fulfillment of Prophecy:
    The connection to Melchizedek fulfills Psalm 110:4, which prophesies, "The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind: ‘You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.’"

New Covenant:
    Jesus’ priesthood ushers in a new covenant (Hebrews 8:6-13), replacing the old covenant mediated by the Levitical priests.
    This covenant is based on grace, not the Law, and offers eternal redemption.

Perfect Sacrifice:
    Unlike Levitical priests who offered repeated animal sacrifices, Jesus offered Himself as a once-for-all sacrifice for sin (Hebrews 9:24-28).
    His role as High Priest is to intercede eternally for humanity (Hebrews 7:25).

Implications of Jesus’ Melchizedekian Priesthood

Transcending Lineage:
    By not being tied to Levi, Jesus’ priesthood is open to all, extending God’s grace universally.
Eternal Intercession:
    Jesus’ role as a priest forever assures believers of continual access to God and eternal salvation.
Unity of Roles:
    As King and Priest, Jesus uniquely unites spiritual and temporal authority, perfectly ruling and interceding for His people.

This concept shows how Jesus fulfills and surpasses the Old Testament roles and laws, establishing a perfect, eternal means of reconciliation with God. Would you like to explore more on this topic?

stock here: they must have been planning this for some time, and wanted to pull it off whilst Puppet Idiot Brandon was in the cat bird seat. How can we ever free ourselves from the Zionists? AI Created a map of the area, its partly educational, partly amusing

A reader dropped this comment, which AI helped to unpack.

———————————

Obviously it’s just regular ( conventional) arms and ( now) unmanned air defense that was ( is) targeted.

Kurdish people as usual get the short end of the stick. 🙁

Israel gets back what it won in 1967, but lost in 1973.

Syrians get a not so Liberal .gov…we will see if there will be (selections) elections, or not.

This is also a warning to Jordan that lives and breathes with life support from the Minority ( Hashemite) not to antagonize it’s people and take extra precautions.

As a Lewi awaiting his land north of Jerusalem…and that WON’T happen under the Zionists…I await further developments.

———————————————–

ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The comment touches on several complex and interconnected issues related to Middle Eastern geopolitics, specifically regarding Syria, Israel, Jordan, and broader regional dynamics. Here’s a breakdown:

1. “Obviously it’s just regular (conventional) arms and (now) unmanned air defense that was (is) targeted.” This refers to the ongoing military operations in the region, likely focusing on the destruction or targeting of conventional military assets such as arms depots and air defense systems.
   “Unmanned air defense” could imply the use of drones or autonomous systems to target enemy infrastructure.
2. “Kurdish people as usual get the short end of the stick.” The Kurdish people, an ethnic group spread across Syria, Iraq, Turkey, and Iran, have long sought autonomy or independence but have often been marginalized.
   In Syria, Kurds played a significant role in fighting ISIS, but they face ongoing challenges from various state actors, including Turkey, Syria, and others, who resist Kurdish self-determination.
3. “Israel gets back what it won in 1967, but lost in 1973.” This refers to territorial changes involving Israel’s control of land during and after key conflicts:
   In 1967, during the Six-Day War, Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria.
   In 1973, during the Yom Kippur War, Israel retained the Golan Heights despite a Syrian attempt to retake it.
   The implication might be that Israel is reaffirming its claim or strengthening its control over such territories, possibly with international recognition or indirect consequences from the Syrian conflict.
4. “Syrians get a not so Liberal .gov…we will see if there will be (selections) elections, or not.” This suggests skepticism about the political future of Syria. The term “(selections)” implies a belief that any future electoral process would be more performative or manipulated rather than a genuine democratic election.
   A “not so Liberal .gov” likely refers to the expectation that post-conflict governance in Syria will continue to be authoritarian, reflecting the historical dominance of strongman politics in the region.
5. “This is also a warning to Jordan that lives and breathes with life support from the Minority (Hashemite) not to antagonize its people and take extra precautions.” Jordan’s ruling Hashemite monarchy represents a minority in the country, and its stability depends on balancing relations with its majority population, including Palestinians and tribal Jordanians.
   The warning suggests that regional instability could spill over into Jordan if the monarchy fails to address internal grievances or if it faces external pressures.
6. “As a Lewi awaiting his land north of Jerusalem…and that WON’T happen under the Zionists…I await further developments.” The term “Lewi” (or “Levi”) likely refers to someone of the Jewish priestly tribe of Levi, a lineage with historical and religious significance in Judaism.
   The speaker appears to express discontent with the Zionist movement, which established and governs the modern state of Israel. They seem to believe that Zionist policies are an obstacle to fulfilling religious or historical claims to land “north of Jerusalem.”
   This sentiment might reflect a distinction between religious Jews and secular Zionists, a division that exists in some Jewish communities.

Contextual Themes:

Kurds and Regional Power Struggles: The marginalization of the Kurds highlights broader power dynamics in the Middle East, where their autonomy is often sacrificed for larger geopolitical goals.
Territorial Disputes: The reference to Israel and its territorial control emphasizes the ongoing disputes stemming from wars and international negotiations.

Authoritarianism vs. Democracy: The skepticism about governance in Syria reflects a common theme in post-conflict nations where democratic aspirations often clash with entrenched authoritarian systems.

Jordan's Vulnerability: As a small, resource-scarce monarchy in a volatile region, Jordan must navigate complex internal and external pressures to maintain stability.

Religious vs. Secular Zionism: The comment about being a "Lewi" awaiting land reflects a nuanced critique of Zionism from a perspective that may prioritize religious or historical interpretations over modern political ideologies.

Each of these points ties into the broader and deeply intricate history and politics of the Middle East.

stock here, Viva Frei is one of a kind. “I don’t have solutions….” I made up an example. He also looks like shit, much more than normal.

stock here: legacy media supports this “bold rebrand” with more western style wardrobe. Shameful.

What a joke, they are bombing, purportedly to destroy chemical weapons. Seriously?

Here is a summary, categorization, and count of the comments regarding the “fall” of Syria:
Categories

Blame/Accusation
    Comments accusing specific countries (e.g., USA, Israel, Iran, or Russia) or individuals (e.g., Assad, Zelensky) of causing or contributing to the conflict.
    Examples:
        "@abdulrashidabang5583: Deadly arsenal as always is just an accuse to bombard Syria while Syria is defenceless."
        "@sheikhassan7987: America in all the wars."

Count: 13

Support/Admiration
    Support for specific nations (e.g., Israel, USA) or groups.
    Examples:
        "@ChristianbiosocratesKargbo: Mighty USA and IDF. Game changers."
        "@dokterteda276: Bravo Israel. Pray for Israel be strong❤."

Count: 8

Criticism
    Criticism of nations, actions, or perceived hypocrisy (e.g., WMD claims, oil exploitation).
    Examples:
        "@ravindraverma7735: USA still saying WMDs are there in Syria what a bunch of Liars & warmongers only wants Syrian oil."
        "@the_laughtershow: What will happen to the oil reserves and oil wells that the US has occupied for years?"

Count: 10

Despair/Sarcasm
    Expressing despair or using sarcasm to criticize events.
    Examples:
        "@Dani2kGaming_GEIR: the weapons of mass destruction 😂😂😂."
        "@ryomensukuna4408: The gold bar of destruction."

Count: 7

Future Predictions
    Predictions about what will happen next, such as other nations or groups being targeted.
    Examples:
        "@franciscalixto2049: Next in line Houthis, watch out."
        "@maycruz-pq8wj: now people of Iran n Russia follow the example of Syrian people, China your next."

Count: 6

Neutral/Information-Seeking
    Neutral or non-political comments, often seeking information or clarification.
    Examples:
        "@sanoopbabu1796: What's the name of the background music."
        "@Daniels2024: Who is next in the Middle East?"

Count: 4

Celebration
    Celebratory comments about perceived victories or change.
    Examples:
        "@RomaVilla-q6k: Syrians are now free❤ democracy won🎉."
        "@Vangauh: Muslims are celebrating Syrian victory but deep down we know it's victory of Israel 😂."

Count: 4

Irrelevant/Off-topic
    Comments that are unrelated or unclear.
    Examples:
        "@julianhatton1109: Great Show."
        "@jecekplecekdrapiei: Dejavi?"

Count: 5

Total Counts

Blame/Accusation: 13
Support/Admiration: 8
Criticism: 10
Despair/Sarcasm: 7
Future Predictions: 6
Neutral/Information-Seeking: 4
Celebration: 4
Irrelevant/Off-topic: 5

Overall Observations

The comments heavily focus on blame, accusations, and criticism (especially regarding WMDs and foreign interventions).
There is a mix of despair and sarcasm, indicating frustration with the situation.
Celebratory and supportive comments appear less frequently but highlight differing perspectives on the outcome.
A minority of the comments are neutral or off-topic.

Let me know if you’d like further analysis!

stock here, try this

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1354681525422426/posts/1605692833654626/?comment_id=1606003236956919&reply_comment_id=1607093323514577&notif_id=1733774033749616&notif_t=group_comment_mention

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1354681525422426/user/100091783482506

I been harping on the unusual earthquake patterns for a week or so now. 7.1 North Cali / Oregon

A magnitude 7.0 earthquake struck off the coast of Humboldt County, California, at 10:44 a.m. PST on December 5, 2024. The epicenter was near Petrolia, California.
Wikipedia

Following the earthquake, the National Weather Service issued a tsunami warning for the northern California and Oregon coasts. This prompted precautionary measures, including the temporary suspension of Bay Area Rapid Transit services and the evacuation of the San Francisco Zoo. Approximately 5.3 million Californians were affected by the warning.
Wikipedia

The tsunami warning was canceled at 11:54 a.m. PST. As of now, there are no reports of significant tsunami activity or damage resulting from the earthquake. California Governor Gavin Newsom stated that the state’s emergency offices are “actively responding” to the situation.
Wikipedia

Given your location in Hawaii, there is no tsunami threat to the Hawaiian Islands from this event. The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center has not issued any advisories for Hawaii related to this earthquake.

For the most current information, please monitor updates from the National Tsunami Warning Center and local authorities.

stock here: really stupid, you just get rid of them one by one in unexpected ways, making defense or mitigation less likely. In all fairness though, he did write a book on this same subject a few years back, so it’s not like he is showing a hidden hand.

Government Gangsters’: Trump’s FBI Director Pick Kash Patel’s 60 Name List Of ‘Deep State’ Enemies

His list covers figures from both sides of the political aisle. Read it in full below:

• Michael Atkinson – Former inspector general of the intelligence community
• Lloyd Austin – Secretary of Defense under President Joe Biden
• Brian Auten – Supervisory intelligence analyst, FBI
• James Baker – Former general counsel for the FBI and Twitter executive
• Bill Barr – Former attorney general under Trump
• John Bolton – Former national security adviser under Trump
• Stephen Boyd – Former chief of legislative affairs, FBI
• Joe Biden – President of the United States
• John Brennan – Former CIA director under President Obama
• John Carlin – Former DOJ national security division head under Trump
• Eric Ciaramella – Former National Security Council staffer
• Pat Cipollone – Former White House counsel under Trump
• James Clapper – Former director of national intelligence under Obama
• Hillary Clinton – Former Secretary of State and presidential candidate
• James Comey – Former FBI director
• Elizabeth Dibble – Former deputy chief of mission, U.S. embassy, London
• Mark Esper – Former Secretary of Defense under Trump
• Alyssa Farah – Former strategic communications director under Trump
• Evelyn Farkas – Former Pentagon official under Obama
• Sarah Isgur Flores – Former DOJ communications head under Trump
• Merrick Garland – Attorney General under Biden
• Stephanie Grisham – Former White House press secretary under Trump
• Kamala Harris – Vice President and former presidential candidate
• Gina Haspel – Former CIA director under Trump
• Fiona Hill – Former National Security Council staffer
• Curtis Heide – FBI agent
• Eric Holder – Former attorney general under Obama
• Robert Hur – Special counsel for Biden document investigation
• Cassidy Hutchinson – Former assistant to Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
• Nina Jankowicz – Former head of Biden’s Disinformation Governance Board
• Lois Lerner – Former IRS official under Obama
• Loretta Lynch – Former attorney general under Obama
• Charles Kupperman – Former deputy national security adviser under Trump
• Gen. Kenneth McKenzie (Ret.) – Former CENTCOM commander
• Andrew McCabe – Former FBI deputy director
• Ryan McCarthy – Former Secretary of the Army under Trump
• Mary McCord – Former DOJ national security division head
• Denis McDonough – Former Obama chief of staff, current VA secretary
• Gen. Mark Milley (Ret.) – Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
• Lisa Monaco – Deputy attorney general under Biden
• Robert Mueller – Former FBI director and Russiagate special counsel
• Bruce Ohr – Former DOJ official under Obama and Trump
• Nellie Ohr – Former CIA employee
• Lisa Page – Former FBI counsel
• Pat Philbin – Former deputy White House counsel under Trump
• John Podesta – Former Obama adviser, current Biden climate adviser
• Samantha Power – Former U.N. ambassador under Obama, current USAID administrator
• Bill Priestap – Former FBI counterintelligence chief
• Susan Rice – Former Obama national security adviser
• Rod Rosenstein – Former deputy attorney general under Trump
• Peter Strzok – Former FBI counterintelligence agent
• Jake Sullivan – National Security Adviser under Biden
• Michael Sussman – Former DNC lawyer
• Miles Taylor – Former DHS official under Trump
• Timothy Thibault – Former FBI agent
• Andrew Weissman – Mueller’s Russiagate deputy
• Alexander Vindman – Former National Security Council official
• Christopher Wray – Current FBI director under Trump and Biden
• Sally Yates – Former deputy attorney general under Obama
• Adam Schiff – Senator-elect and former House Intelligence Committee chairman

stock here, this even made the Local News. I am amazed anyone is paying attention LOL

EQ in this area are extremely rare, 19 in 110 years, Sometimes there is a group of 3 in a 2 or 3 year period.

stock here: the rich detail north of Molokai was from when 1/3 of Molokai collapsed leaving multi thousand feet sea walls that exist today.

Let’s talk about the Tsunami generated….

The massive landslide event that caused one-third of Molokaʻi to collapse into the ocean likely generated a significant tsunami, though exact measurements are difficult to determine due to its occurrence approximately 1 to 1.5 million years ago. Here’s what we know:
The Landslide and Its Tsunami

Event Description:
    The collapse, known as the Wailau Landslide, involved the northern flank of Molokaʻi breaking off and sliding into the ocean.
    This catastrophic event created the famous sea cliffs on Molokaʻi's northern shore, which are among the tallest in the world.

Volume of Material:
    The landslide displaced an estimated 5,000 cubic kilometers (about 1,200 cubic miles) of rock and debris into the ocean.
    The debris field extends more than 120 miles (200 km) northward across the ocean floor.

Tsunami Generation:
    Such a large-scale displacement of material would have triggered a mega-tsunami, potentially reaching heights of hundreds of meters near the landslide zone.
    Tsunamis from events like this could devastate surrounding areas and travel vast distances across the Pacific Ocean.

Estimated Tsunami Size

Local Impact:
    Near the collapse zone, tsunami waves might have reached 500 meters (1,640 feet) or more in height, depending on the speed and volume of the material sliding into the ocean.
Regional Impact:
    Waves from similar prehistoric landslides in Hawaiʻi (e.g., on the Big Island) have been modeled to reach 50-100 meters (165-330 feet) in neighboring islands and still cause measurable effects thousands of miles away.

Evidence of the Tsunami

Geological Clues:
    Deposits of marine sediments and coral fragments high above sea level on islands in the Pacific point to ancient tsunami events caused by landslides like this.
Hawaiian Archipelago:
    The Hawaiian Islands’ history of volcanic activity and landslides makes it a hotspot for studying ancient mega-tsunamis.

Comparison to Modern Tsunamis

For context, the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami (caused by a 9.1 earthquake) produced wave heights of 30 meters (100 feet) in some areas. The Wailau Landslide tsunami would have been far larger, given the immense displacement of material.
Conclusion

The Wailau Landslide almost certainly produced one of the largest tsunamis in Earth’s history, with local wave heights potentially exceeding 500 meters and widespread impacts across the Pacific Ocean. Though we lack precise measurements due to its prehistoric timing, the event serves as a stark reminder of the geologic power of volcanic islands and landslides.
You said:
I wonder if early humans in africa or Europe would have encountered this tsunami, would it reach them
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

It’s possible that early humans in Africa or Europe could have encountered tsunamis generated by massive Hawaiian landslides, but the effects would depend on several factors, including the energy of the tsunami, the distance from Hawaiʻi, and the geography of the coastlines.
Could the Molokaʻi Tsunami Reach Africa or Europe?

Tsunami Travel Distance:
    Tsunamis can travel vast distances across the ocean at speeds of up to 500-600 mph (800-1,000 km/h).
    The Hawaiian Islands are approximately:
        18,000 km (11,000 miles) from Africa's eastern coast.
        Slightly farther from Europe.

A mega-tsunami triggered by a landslide as massive as the Wailau Landslide could cross the Pacific Ocean, round the southern tip of Africa, and enter the Atlantic.

Energy Dissipation:
    As tsunamis propagate across oceans, their energy dissipates over distance. By the time such a tsunami reached the coastlines of Africa or Europe, it would likely have diminished in height and intensity. However, given the scale of the event, it might still have produced measurable and potentially dangerous waves.

Geographic Amplification:
    Narrow bays, river deltas, or inlets can amplify tsunami waves, making them much larger locally. If a diminished wave reached a region with such geography, it could still cause significant flooding and damage.

Would Early Humans Have Encountered It?

Timing:
    The Wailau Landslide occurred approximately 1 to 1.5 million years ago, during the Lower Pleistocene epoch.
    Early humans (e.g., Homo erectus) were present in Africa and parts of Eurasia at this time. Some may have lived near coasts and could theoretically have been affected by the event.

Possible Effects:
    If the tsunami reached Africa’s east coast, it might have caused flooding, disruption of ecosystems, and displacement of coastal populations.
    Evidence of this would likely be hard to find today due to the passage of time, coastal erosion, and sediment deposition.

Prehistoric Evidence of Tsunamis

While direct evidence of the Wailau Landslide tsunami in Africa or Europe is unlikely, other prehistoric tsunamis have left traces:

Landslide Tsunamis:
    Similar events have occurred in other volcanic islands, such as the Canary Islands, with evidence of massive waves impacting nearby continents.
Mega-Tsunami Deposits:
    Sediment layers far inland or high above sea level in coastal areas sometimes point to ancient tsunamis.

Conclusion

It’s plausible that early humans in Africa or Europe might have experienced diminished but still significant effects from the tsunami caused by the Wailau Landslide. However, the exact impact would depend on how far the wave’s energy propagated and how it interacted with the geography of coastal regions. While direct evidence is scarce, it’s an intriguing possibility in understanding the interaction between prehistoric geology and early human populations.

stock here: He pretends that WW1 and WW2 were started by 2 Christian Capitalist sets of countries, when in fact, both wars were instigated mostly by purveyors of usury, iffen you know what I mean.

Wolff wants to shrug off the “Stalin Period” in USSR, throw it out the window with 60,000,000 murdered by Stalin, the Marxist, and his 50% Jew governmental leaders who fully participated in the Genocides and Starvations. Per paragraph one, by blaming much less death in WW1 and WW2 on “Christian Capitalists” when these wars were primarily instigated by the Jewish Bankers.

A comment summary: The fact that he brings in this neo-word Equity, tells one almost all they need to know. Equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity, that is the leftist spin on thing to destabilize the status quo.

Criticism to Peterson

1. Not judging marxism considering only the terrible Stalin period in Soviet Union. Analogy with atrocities by Christians.

2. Reducing marxism to the problem of inequality. And reducing the problem of inequality to the envy of the poor for the success of the rich.

Wolffs’ analysis: Inequality has been discussed for a thousand details. In fact, capitalism emerged during the American and French revolution, claiming to bring liberty, equity and fraternity.

Where is the equity promised?

Marxism finds an explanation: The master retains the wealth that the creativity of the employees produces, while the mass of the working class is excluded from the surplus. Employers and employees, masters and slaves.

———————————————- This one is funny….you don’t have a bats chance of changing my mind, I am just writing this to get you to change your mind. And the leftist climate crisis bullshit of “kill everything on the planet”. He Knows It. LOL

 @buddysilver5788  I don’t need to give a flip about Marx, or be a socialist, or even be on the left to know that late stage capitalism’s unfettered greed is going to kill everything on the planet if we don’t knock it the F off. A system that depends on infinite growth in a finite world is simply unsustainable. And a system that has boom/bust built into it will never offer equality and only offers justice in rare lucky circumstance. Capitalism rather depends on inequality, the ability of the moneyed few to subjugate the disenfranchised many, including every living thing in the entire natural world. Capitalism is not sovereign. Life , every living thing in this world, is. Time to move on. Please do spare me the argument. You don’t have a bat’s chance of changing my mind. I only wrote this in hope that you will actually give the matter some critical thought. Capitalism is destroying the natural world- *Human Habitat*.

————————————————————————————

stock here: In his opening remarks, he takes a shot at Brett Kavanaugh, to a few, just a few, laughs from the audience, mostly female laughs. By 8 minutes into this “presentation” one can understand this “Democrat”. He is kind of old, kind of fat, kind of not funny.

He pretends that Marx was only about criticizing capitalism. I thought the below sentiment was from Marx, but it was actually from Mussolini. “Everything in the State, Nothing outside the State, and viciously attack anything that tries to get outside the State”.

1818 Born Karl Marx. Was a professor who got fired, and was exiled “sent out” the German’s put him on a train to Paris, were the police were waiting, and sent him on a train to Brussels. Eventually London accepted him, LOL, Check it out.

A top comment: A paraphrase from John Steinbeck that I like and agree with: “Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires”

———————— For the comment above, for the last decade or more, every

Marx focused on criticizing capitalism….he explains how every system evolves and dies, as every system collapses under it’s own internal contradictions.

stock here: I have always been a bit confused on this word. So many use it with total confidence, but I thought there was more nuance, and there is, thanks AI.

The word secular has evolved significantly over time, drawing from its roots in Latin and adapting to various cultural, religious, and philosophical contexts. Its meaning today can vary depending on its usage in different disciplines, such as theology, politics, or sociology. Here’s a comprehensive exploration:
Etymology and Early History

Latin Origins:
    The word "secular" originates from the Latin word saecularis, meaning "worldly" or "of an age."
    Saeculum referred to a "generation" or "age," implying a span of human time rather than divine or eternal time.
    In Roman times, it also denoted something pertaining to the earthly life, as opposed to the timeless or spiritual realm.

Medieval Usage:
    In Christian contexts, secular distinguished between the "religious" (those living in monastic orders) and the "secular clergy" (priests who served in the world, such as parish priests).
    The term was used to delineate the worldly duties and responsibilities of people as opposed to their spiritual obligations.

The Renaissance and Early Modern Period

Expansion to Worldly Affairs:
    During the Renaissance, as humanist philosophies flourished, "secular" began to take on a broader meaning associated with life outside of strictly religious or ecclesiastical control.
    It came to signify interests in art, science, and politics that were not governed by religious doctrine.

Reformation Era:
    The Protestant Reformation further clarified "secular" as representing realms of governance and society separate from church authority.
    Secular rulers were contrasted with ecclesiastical authorities.

The Enlightenment

Separation of Church and State:
    In the Enlightenment, secularism emerged as a philosophy advocating the separation of religion from political and public life.
    Thinkers like John Locke and Voltaire emphasized rationalism and individual freedoms, which often contrasted with religious institutions.
    Secular came to represent neutrality in governance regarding religious affairs.

Rise of Secular Humanism:
    During this time, secular humanism developed, focusing on ethics, reason, and human potential without reliance on divine authority.

Modern Usage

Broad Meanings:
    Today, "secular" can describe:
        Worldly vs. Spiritual: Things related to this life, not the sacred or eternal.
        Neutrality in Religion: A stance that avoids promoting or opposing any particular religion.
        Non-religious: Institutions, individuals, or philosophies that are entirely free from religious influence.

Secularism in Society:
    Political Context: Advocacy for the separation of church and state, ensuring governance is free from religious influence.
    Cultural Context: A trend in which religion plays a less central role in individuals’ lives and societal norms.
    Philosophical Context: A worldview that finds meaning and morality in human reasoning and experience rather than in supernatural beliefs.

Popular Misinterpretations:
    In some contexts, secularism is misunderstood as being "anti-religion." However, its core meaning is neutrality or independence from religion, not opposition to it.

What Does “Secular” Really Mean Today?

Today, “secular” carries several connotations depending on context:

Neutrality: A commitment to fairness by avoiding religious favoritism in governance, education, and public institutions.

Worldliness: Concern with practical, temporal matters rather than spiritual or religious considerations.

Diversity and Pluralism: A space where multiple religions and worldviews coexist without domination by one.

Modernity: A characteristic of societies that prioritize scientific, technological, and rational advancements over traditional religious explanations.

Conclusion

The word “secular” has undergone a journey from its roots in describing temporal life to its modern applications in defining societal structures and philosophical frameworks. While its core essence—”of this world”—remains, its meaning has broadened to reflect the evolving relationship between religion and human affairs.

stock here: She touches on it. Biden as the “Big Guy” who always got 10% of the Grift, was similarly guilty as those generating the original bribes and payouts. So his advisors (although I am not at all sure they care about Joe one bit, but they may see it as important to the Dem party going forward, to not have their puppet convicted on serious crimes) that the new DOJ may bring. However, stock throwing down….this does not absolve any of them of any State or Local laws…..

AI summary of the transcript——————–
The video discusses President Joe Biden’s recent pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, covering an array of potential and actual federal crimes. The host criticizes this decision, viewing it as an abuse of power aimed at shielding Hunter Biden and potentially protecting Joe Biden himself from further scrutiny.
Key Points:

Hunter Biden’s Pardon:
    Joe Biden pardoned Hunter Biden for alleged federal crimes spanning over a decade.
    The host views this pardon as indicative of corruption and enabling Hunter's behavior rather than holding him accountable.
    Criticism includes the hypocrisy of Biden's past statements about justice and not pardoning his son.

Cultural and Political Commentary:
    The host argues that Hunter Biden symbolizes a societal shift toward entitlement and a lack of accountability, likening it to a "participation trophy culture."
    Questions are raised about how the media and political opposition would react if a similar pardon involved Donald Trump's children.

Legal and Public Backlash:
    The host highlights public and political criticism of the pardon, emphasizing that many Democrats view the act as damaging to Biden's legacy and the Democratic Party.
    There is mention of a Department of Justice motion rejecting the dismissal of Hunter Biden's charges despite the pardon, suggesting that legal battles may continue.

Comparison with Donald Trump:
    The host contrasts Biden's actions with Donald Trump's presidency, emphasizing that Trump was perceived as a "strong father figure" who avoided wars and maintained control.
    Trump's recent statements regarding hostages in the Middle East are praised as an example of assertive leadership.

Broader Critique of Society and Politics:
    Commentary extends to societal issues such as moral decay, leniency in legal matters, and the erosion of traditional values.
    Criticism is directed at California legislation and governance, especially regarding taxpayer funds for legal support of undocumented immigrants and lenient laws.

Tone and Style:

The video is critical of Joe Biden and the Democratic Party, with a heavy focus on accountability, traditional values, and skepticism of progressive policies.
The host employs a mix of humor, frustration, and anecdotal reflections to engage the audience.

stock here: crossed my mind 50 times…standing at bank teller, and they are typing for like 4 minutes in order to make a deposit to my business account, and I have already given them the account number. What the heck could tell possibly be doing? Taking someone’s money should be the easiest thing and the quickest.

I sense longer waits post COVID, not sure why that would be the case. Any Ideas?

stock here: we noted the recent unusual EQ activity in Hawaii.

There have been 22 OarFish strandings in California since 1901. But 3 of them have been since August of 2024!!! There was also a Slew of Oarfish in 2013, and a DOZEN in Japan prior to the great Tohoku earthquake and tsunami

August 10, 2024: A 12-foot oarfish was discovered by kayakers and snorkelers near La Jolla Cove. The specimen was transported to the NOAA facility for necropsy to determine the cause of death.
People

September 2024: Another oarfish washed ashore in Huntington Beach. Details about this incident are less specific, but it contributed to the unusual frequency of sightings that year.
KUOW

November 6, 2024: A 9- to 10-foot oarfish was found on Grandview Beach in Encinitas by a researcher from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. This marked the third such occurrence in Southern California since August 2024.
KUOW

These recent strandings have intrigued researchers, prompting investigations into potential causes. Factors such as changes in ocean conditions, including El Niño and La Niña cycles, red tides, and weather events like Santa Ana winds, are being considered as possible contributors to these unusual appearances.
People

In Japanese folklore, oarfish are often regarded as harbingers of natural disasters, particularly earthquakes. However, scientific studies have found no significant correlation between oarfish strandings and seismic activity.

---

Between 2013 and 2014, an unusual series of oarfish (Regalecus russelii) strandings occurred along the California coastline and other parts of the world, drawing significant attention from both the public and scientific communities. These deep-sea creatures, typically inhabiting depths between 300 and 3,000 feet, are rarely observed near the surface, making their beachings particularly noteworthy.

Documented Strandings in 2013-2014:

October 13, 2013: A 14-foot oarfish was discovered off Catalina Island, California. This rare find garnered widespread media coverage and sparked curiosity about the species.

October 18, 2013: Just days later, another oarfish, measuring approximately 18 feet, washed ashore in Oceanside, California. The proximity in timing and location to the previous stranding raised questions among researchers.

Subsequent Months: Additional oarfish strandings were reported in various locations, including Japan and the Philippines, during this period. The frequency of these events was unusual compared to historical records.

Scientific Investigations:

The spate of strandings prompted scientific investigations to understand potential causes. Misty Paig-Tran, an associate professor of biological science at California State University, Fullerton, studied four of the oarfish that washed ashore during this timeframe. Her research aimed to gather insights into the biology and possible reasons for the sudden increase in strandings.

Potential Explanations:

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the increased frequency of oarfish strandings during 2013-2014:

Environmental Factors: Changes in ocean conditions, such as temperature fluctuations, could have affected oarfish behavior, leading them closer to shore.

Seismic Activity: In Japanese folklore, oarfish are considered harbingers of earthquakes. However, scientific studies, including one conducted in Japan in 2019, found no significant correlation between oarfish strandings and seismic events.

Health and Disorientation: Illness or disorientation may cause oarfish to stray from their deep-sea habitats, resulting in strandings.

Conclusion:

The 2013-2014 oarfish strandings provided a rare opportunity for scientific study of this elusive species. While the exact causes remain uncertain, these events highlighted the importance of monitoring deep-sea species as potential indicators of ocean health and environmental changes.

And as you would expect, NPR flips the Scripped, and positions Oarfish as a “savior”, WOW. Scroll all the way down for that Gem.

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/19/nx-s1-5196630/oarfish-california-japan-folklore

expand on this as a double negative, meaning that if you are OK to be judged, then it is ok to judge others, but if not then you should not judge wince then you will be judged and it will be negative. aka do not turn in those who are also doing evil.

————————- Comment online

Can’t agree more these freaks are insane, but, and zero reflection on you at all because it’s proof these freaks bastardize everything, even scripture, it actually reads, ” Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Matthew 7:1.

Which is a double negative which to me (IMH discernment) we had better and do judge, daily in fact, in order to decide whom to befriend and whom to avoid. But we had better do it righteously because if we don’t, the same will happen to us.

——————————— LOL
This content may violate our usage policies.
ChatGPT said:

The verse “Judge not, that ye be not judged” (Matthew 7:1) can be interpreted as a nuanced warning about judgment. Expanding on this as a double negative highlights its reciprocal nature: if you are okay being judged, then it’s okay to judge others—but if you prefer not to be judged negatively, you should refrain from judging others in a hypocritical or unfair manner.
Contextual Expansion:

Judgment is inevitable in daily life; we constantly evaluate people and situations to make decisions about trust, relationships, and actions. This verse doesn’t necessarily mean that all judgment is wrong but emphasizes the importance of righteous judgment—fair, compassionate, and reflective of the same standards we would accept for ourselves. Here’s how the double negative comes into play:

If you judge others, expect to be judged by the same measure.
    This means that the standards and principles you apply to others will be mirrored back on you. If your judgment is harsh or hypocritical, others (and possibly divine judgment) will hold you to that same scrutiny.
    Example: Criticizing someone for dishonesty while engaging in deceit yourself invites hypocrisy and harsh judgment toward your own actions.

If you avoid judging others, you are less likely to face negative judgment.
    By withholding judgment—especially unjust or self-serving criticism—you remove yourself from a cycle of harsh scrutiny. This is especially relevant in situations where both parties may have faults or "sins."

"Do not turn in those who are also doing evil."
    This reflects an understanding of mutual accountability. If someone is involved in wrongdoing, pointing fingers hypocritically or self-righteously may backfire because their flaws mirror your own. It is better to focus on personal integrity and righteousness before casting judgment on others.

Judgment is not inherently wrong; it must be righteous and discerning.
    Scripture also states, "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment" (John 7:24). This shows that judgment aligned with truth, fairness, and compassion is necessary for making wise decisions.

Practical Takeaway:

Double Negative Meaning: "If you do not want to face negative judgment, do not judge negatively." But, since judgment is part of human discernment, the guiding principle is to ensure your judgment is fair, self-reflective, and rooted in genuine care for others.
Spiritual Application: By recognizing our own imperfections and judging others with humility, we avoid the trap of hypocrisy and ensure that any judgment we face is proportionate and just.

In essence, this interpretation emphasizes self-awareness, mutual accountability, and the importance of humility in our interactions with others. It doesn’t call for abandoning judgment altogether but encourages a thoughtful and fair approach.

To fully understand the context of John 7:24, let’s explore the verse itself along with the surrounding verses. This will give a richer insight into its meaning and its connection to the theme of righteous judgment.
John 7:24

“Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.”

This verse is part of a broader discussion where Jesus addresses criticism and misunderstanding about his actions, particularly healing on the Sabbath. It serves as a reminder to look beyond superficial impressions and make judgments based on truth, fairness, and deeper understanding.
Context in John 7
Verses Leading Up to John 7:24

John 7:14-15
Jesus begins teaching in the temple during the Feast of Tabernacles, astonishing the people with his wisdom:
"About the middle of the feast Jesus went up into the temple and began teaching. The Jews therefore marveled, saying, 'How is it that this man has learning, when he has never studied?'"

John 7:16-18
Jesus emphasizes that his teaching comes from God, not from his own authority, and that those who seek to do God’s will can discern the truth of his words:
"So Jesus answered them, 'My teaching is not mine, but his who sent me. If anyone’s will is to do God’s will, he will know whether the teaching is from God or whether I am speaking on my own authority. The one who speaks on his own authority seeks his own glory, but the one who seeks the glory of him who sent him is true, and in him there is no falsehood.'”

John 7:19-23
Jesus rebukes the people for their inconsistency in judging him. They criticize him for healing on the Sabbath, yet they themselves break the law of Moses by circumcising on the Sabbath to keep the law:
"Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. Why do you seek to kill me?" ... 'If on the Sabbath a man receives circumcision so that the law of Moses may not be broken, are you angry with me because on the Sabbath I made a man’s whole body well?'"

This highlights their hypocrisy: they judge Jesus harshly for a good act while excusing their own perceived exceptions to the law.

John 7:24 and the Verses After

John 7:24
"Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment."
This is a call to avoid shallow, surface-level judgment and instead seek deeper, righteous discernment. It implies the need for fairness, truth, and alignment with God’s will when evaluating others.

John 7:25-27
Some people begin to question whether Jesus is truly the Messiah, yet their judgment is clouded by their assumptions about his origins:
"Some of the people of Jerusalem therefore said, 'Is not this the man whom they seek to kill? And here he is, speaking openly, and they say nothing to him! Can it be that the authorities really know that this is the Christ? But we know where this man comes from, and when the Christ appears, no one will know where he comes from.'”

John 7:28-30
Jesus responds by pointing out their limited understanding of his mission and divine origin:
"So Jesus proclaimed, as he taught in the temple, 'You know me, and you know where I come from. But I have not come of my own accord. He who sent me is true, and him you do not know. I know him, for I come from him, and he sent me.' So they were seeking to arrest him, but no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come."

Interpretation of John 7:24 in Context

Jesus calls for righteous judgment—evaluations that are not based on superficial appearances, biases, or legalistic interpretations but rooted in truth, fairness, and God’s will. He confronts the hypocrisy of his critics, who are quick to condemn him based on their own flawed understanding while failing to apply the same scrutiny to themselves.

This connects to the earlier theme in Matthew 7:1 about the dangers of hypocritical judgment. Both passages challenge us to:

Examine our own motives and imperfections before judging others.
Base our judgments on righteous principles, not appearances or cultural assumptions.
Reflect on whether our judgments align with God’s values of compassion, truth, and justice.

Application Today

The lesson of John 7:24 is particularly relevant in a world where snap judgments are common. It encourages thoughtful discernment and humility, urging us to judge fairly and with an awareness of our own fallibility. In doing so, we emulate the righteous judgment that Jesus calls us to practice.

stock here, that’s all I have to say

stock here: I have questioned her authenticity before. She does supply grains of truth, which are essential for any lie / psyop, “drama” for personal enrichment. From the very get go, I alway thought that for a “Doctor” she was emphasizing the “hot” aspect just too much. Truth reveals, she is really not hot at all, and that when the cost to maintain the illusion became too high, she fell back to what she really is…physically, an “OK” Old Lady.

Check out this parody / attack site on the pyschologist, pHD, Doctor Jane

@1realdrjaneruby

stock here: this is an extremely unlikely location for a relatively large 3.5 EQ. Just saying, the terra firma is on the move.