web analytics
Categories
Uncategorized

Confirmed, The New “Pope” Is a Leftist Piece of Sheet

stock here: I did a mid-deep dive on this new American Pope, after the Jesuit POS. He is a socialist (at best) globalist, and liftist who will carry all the lies. He did a manuveur last week saying that a marriage can only be between a man and a woman (without defining what that is). I call that a mis-direction before he start laying out the leftist agenda. Which he is now doing.

———————–

https://readallaboutitnews.com/pope-leo-xiv-fell-apart-completely-with-this-stunt-that-left-traditional-catholics-shell-shocked/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=rabi_2943703546&utm_source=&utm_term=&utm_content=240198

Leo is doubling down on his predecessor’s controversial environmental agenda instead of focusing on core Catholic doctrine.

This is the same Pope who’s been called a “WOKE MARXIST POPE” by Trump ally Laura Loomer after his left-wing social media posts surfaced.²

Former Senator Rick Santorum, a devout Catholic, expressed serious concerns about Leo’s direction after the papal election.

“I have very little optimism about the new pontiff,” Santorum said during a Newsmax appearance.³

——————————————————— Look at this spin, amazing.

He warned that humanity’s “dominion over nature” shouldn’t become “tyrannical” but should be “a relationship of reciprocity.”

This kind of language sounds exactly like what you’d hear from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or other Democrat politicians pushing their Green New Deal agenda.

Leo also stressed that the Catholic Church’s involvement in the climate fight is based on the Social Doctrine of the Church, which he’s using to justify this radical departure from traditional Catholic priorities.

Categories
Uncategorized

Matt Gaetz Seems Like He Wants to be Ostracized, He Speaks in Truth

stock here: this is gutsy

The parasite does not wish to fully kill it’s host, especially when it can steal nuclear weapons from host.

And they attack our Liberty, and those injured survivors who saw their friends and crew mates die, in a 2 hour attack were forced to sign NDAs. I always thought the event was 1 single missile, this is eye opening!

Categories
Uncategorized

Ketanji (beautiful) Brown Is Roasted by Comments on Twitter

stock here: i had to try 5 times to get the embed code….but check the comments, they are over whelmingly negative. Amazing they couldn’t even a muster a troll to say something supportive of her.

Summary of comments here:

🔎 Key Themes in the Comments:
🧠 Criticism of Legal Reasoning
Many commenters claim KBJ’s dissent or opinions are not grounded in legal logic but in emotion or personal belief (e.g., “based on her feelings,” “like a diary entry”).

Several say her arguments lack coherence or legal rigor and refer to her writing as “entry-level” or “nonsense.”

🎭 Perception of Performative or Theatrical Behavior
Accusations of grandstanding or dramatics during oral arguments: “goes on and on,” “interrupts others,” “spazzed out theater performance.”

Some mock her vocal tone or delivery as childish or unserious.

🏛 Objections to Identity-Based Appointment
Multiple comments refer to her as a “DEI appointment,” meaning her selection was based on diversity, equity, and inclusion rather than merit.

One user calls her “the DEI experiment,” another references “affirmative action,” and several say Biden appointed her because of her identity.

Some express disbelief that she graduated from Harvard Law.

🧾 Doubt of Authenticity or Qualification
Comments question whether she writes her own opinions or uses AI/staff exclusively.

One sarcastically references a “Temu Law Degree.”

Some suggest she lacks basic constitutional knowledge (e.g., “We are a republic, not a democracy”).

🖊 Autopen Allegation
At least two commenters claim or speculate that KBJ was appointed using an autopen signature, suggesting the process was illegitimate or rushed.

😡 Mockery and Personal Insults
Many comments cross into personal attacks:

Mocking her intelligence (“96 IQ”).

Mocking her speech level (“5th grade level”).

Using demeaning language (e.g., “stupid cow,” “sitcom theater kid”).

🧭 General Tone and Bias
This collection of comments is overwhelmingly negative, mocking, and deeply skeptical of KBJ’s qualifications, independence, and legitimacy as a justice. Most seem to originate from a right-leaning or anti-DEI perspective, with emotional language and identity-driven critique rather than detailed legal counterarguments.

Categories
Uncategorized

Ketanji Brown Isn’t Smart Enough to Even Lie

stock here:

I thought SCOTUS opinions were supposed to provide legal analysis. Ketanji Brown Jackson seems to view them as a platform to express her feelings. Maybe she should have become an influencer instead of a Supreme Court justice.

She is only 54, we could be stuck with her for 30 years.

Was her appointment signed by Auto-Pen

Note the resemblance to the World Economic Forum

Attempted Impeachments

Impeachment of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

To remove a U.S. Supreme Court justice, the process is the same as impeachment for the President — and it’s extremely rare and difficult:

1. Impeachment by the House of Representatives requires a simple majority vote.
2. Conviction by the Senate requires a two-thirds vote.

Only one Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached (Samuel Chase in 1804), and none have ever been removed via impeachment.

Historical Attempts to Impeach Justices

Justice Samuel Chase (1804-1805)

Reason for Impeachment: Accused of political bias and arbitrary rulings in trials involving Democratic-Republican defendants.
Outcome: Impeached by the House in 1804. Acquitted by the Senate in 1805.
Significance: Set a precedent discouraging partisan impeachment of justices.

Justice William O. Douglas (1970)

Reason for Impeachment Attempt: Accused by House Minority Leader Gerald Ford of financial misconduct and poor judgment.
Outcome: Investigated by the House Judiciary Committee. No articles of impeachment filed.
Significance: Highlighted the broad and controversial interpretation of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’.

Justice Abe Fortas (1969)

Reason for Impeachment Talk: Accepted $20,000 from a foundation associated with a convicted stock manipulator.
Outcome: Resigned under pressure. No formal proceedings occurred.
Significance: His resignation avoided formal impeachment.

Chief Justice Earl Warren (1950s-60s)

Reason for Impeachment Talk: Accused by political opponents for liberal rulings, especially on civil rights cases.
Outcome: No impeachment resolution was filed.
Significance: Reflective of ideological attacks without substantive misconduct allegations.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh (2018, 2021)

Reason for Impeachment Calls: Allegations of perjury and sexual misconduct during confirmation hearings.
Outcome: Some members of Congress called for impeachment inquiries. No articles were filed.
Significance: Demonstrated modern polarization over Supreme Court confirmations.

——————————————- PROCESS FOR REMOVAL

To remove a U.S. Supreme Court justice, the process is the same as impeachment for the President — and it’s extremely rare and difficult:

🔨 1. Impeachment by the House of Representatives
The House must pass articles of impeachment by a simple majority vote (218 of 435 if all members vote).

The charges typically involve “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” — the same constitutional standard as for presidents.

⚖️ 2. Trial and Conviction by the Senate
The Senate then holds a trial, presided over by the Vice President (or sometimes the Chief Justice if the accused is the President).

To convict and remove the justice, two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict (67 of 100 senators if all are present).

📜 Historical Note
Only one Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached:

Justice Samuel Chase (1804) was impeached by the House for political bias and misconduct.

He was acquitted by the Senate in 1805, and remained on the bench.

No Supreme Court justice has ever been removed from office by impeachment.

🧷 Other Removal Scenarios (Extremely Rare or Theoretical)
Resignation – voluntary.

Death in office – common due to lifetime appointments.

Disability – there’s no formal procedure to remove a justice for mental or physical unfitness unless impeachment is used.

🔒 In Summary
Step Requirement Outcome
1 House majority Justice is impeached
2 Senate 2/3 vote Justice is removed

Removing a Supreme Court justice is meant to be difficult by design, to ensure judicial independence from political whims.

Seen on Twitter:

Categories
Uncategorized

Comey and Brennan, A Summary

stock here: they should be able to prove all of this, and tell Hillary that if she doesn’t interfere to screw up the prosecution, she can live her natural life outside of bars, and use that to also defuse other potential actors…after first also showing them the dirt on themselves, the evidence, and the possible charges and jail terms. Combat!

Categories
Uncategorized

Weather Modification?

stock here, never seen anything like this!

Categories
Uncategorized

Doctor for Bush, Obama, Trump, Speaks Out About Dr, Kevin O’Conner Pleading the 5th

stock here: he has credibility

Categories
Uncategorized

The Democrats Ideas For Now and The Future, Fight Trump, Beg for $3

stock here: got this in an email.

Join us.
Stock, this is a longer email, but we have a big update for you.If you can’t stick around for every word, we’ll cut straight to the chase: The DNC is ramping up our work against Trump and his allies, but we can’t do it without your support.

Organizing and legal battles aren’t cheap, and we count on grassroots supporters like you to power our fight to elect Democrats who will fight for working families and communities nationwide.

If this work matters to you, please consider donating $3 to the DNC today >>If you’ve stored your info with ActBlue, we’ll process your contribution instantly.CONTRIBUTE $3Here are the three things you need to know right now:

TRUMP’S BUDGET BILL HAS BEEN SIGNED INTO LAW This bill represents the largest transfer of wealth from the working class to the billionaire class in US history.

It will cut Medicaid and food assistance (like SNAP) for millions of Americans — while handing the ultrawealthy a giant tax break. Taking back Congress will be the key to stopping more harmful legislation like this — and that work has to start now.

WE’VE OFFICIALLY LAUNCHED ORGANIZING SUMMER This summer, the DNC is investing in organizers in every state — red, blue, and purple — across the country to ensure that we’re reaching as many voters as we can. Taking back Congress and electing down-ballot Democrats who will fight against Trump and his allies is our highest priority right now, and we’re excited to get folks across the country involved.

WE’RE FIGHTING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IN COURT TO PROTECT OUR ELECTIONS Since Inauguration Day, the Trump administration has been trying to rewrite longstanding campaign finance laws, overturning decades of precedent. The DNC, along with the DSCC and DCCC, have filed a motion asking the Supreme Court to allow us to defend the federal election law that sets limits on coordinated party expenditures against the Republican Party’s challenge.

This motion has been granted. We’re fighting like hell against the Trump administration and its allies to protect our democracy and the American people. But organizing nationwide and taking the administration to court won’t be cheap.

Steven, we’re counting on your support to help us hold this administration and the Republican majority accountable. Please pitch in $3 to the DNC to help us elect Democrats up and down the ballot who will fight for the American people.
Categories
Uncategorized

F1 and Brad Pitt, GOAT, and Now Red Bull F1 Leader of 20 Years is Ousted

I saw the F1 Movie last night and it was excellent in many ways. A GOAT.

https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/christian-horner-let-go-by-red-bull-after-20-years-as-f1-team-principal-242974789820

Categories
Uncategorized

Sleeper — Why Did They Let Her Mouth Off? Ketanji Brown Jackson

stock here: She is a sleeper, like Mike Pence, “playing nice” until they are forced to play their part. And the white female justice with black adoptees (I see more and more of this, even out in the country) (Amy Coney Barrett) takes a few serious shots the the diversity hire. So what is the game here, why did they let her mouth off? They should have saved her for a more important issue that they could actually win.

And remember, this creature famously stated that she could not define what a woman is.

And normally “liberal” Justice Sonia Sotomayor, also pushes back on Ketanji (a Biden appointee, of course).

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sotomayor-breaks-jackson-supreme-court-decision-over-trump-cuts-federal-workforce

CNN selects this picture of her, for what reason? It is not flattering, she does have that wide eyed leftist lunacy look.

Conservative Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett stunned veteran bench watchers Friday with a blunt takedown of liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s “extreme” dissent in the landmark birthright citizenship case in which the Supreme Court curtailed lower court use of universal injunctions.

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,” wrote Barrett, the court’s second-newest justice, in a jaw-dropping rebuke of her colleague, the newest justice.

“We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary

————————————-

Jackson’s stats prove she is not qualified to be on SCOTUS. Supreme Court Ketanji Brown Jackson served on the U.S. District Court for the DC from 2013-21. During that time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

District of Columbia overturned 11.9% of her decisions.When compared to all D.C.federal district judges for whom appeals analytics are available, Jackson’s reversal rate is

in the bottom 36.4%. When compared to all Democrat-appointed D.C. federal district judges for whom appeals analytics are available, Jackson’s reversal rate is in the bottom 30.8%. Jackson’s high reversal rate, especially before a court whose active judges tend to share her ideological

orientation (6 out 10 appointed by Dems) signals low judicial competence.

—————————-

Right after the 1 minute mark, Biden states his selection process will only include Black Women. Ketanji was an aid for Brennan who is the justice that stepped down. Maybe there was some hanky panky to get into position.

You’re absolutely right now — Justice Stephen Breyer retired in 2022, and his former law clerk, Ketanji Brown Jackson, was chosen by President Biden to replace him. This made her the first former Supreme Court clerk to serve alongside her former Justice’s colleagues.

🧓 Why Did Justice Breyer Resign?
✅ 1. Age and Tenure
Breyer was 83 years old at the time of his retirement in 2022.

He had served on the Supreme Court for 28 years (appointed by Bill Clinton in 1994).

Like Brennan, his decision was largely voluntary, citing age and the natural timing for retirement.

🕊️ 2. Political Pressure From the Left
Progressive activists and Democratic lawmakers pressured Breyer to retire while Democrats still held control of the Senate and presidency, to avoid a repeat of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg situation (who passed in 2020 under a Republican president, resulting in a conservative replacement).

Groups like Demand Justice launched campaigns urging him to retire:

“Retire Breyer” signs were seen outside the Court starting in early 2021.

🗣️ 3. His Own Words
At his formal announcement with President Biden in January 2022, Breyer said:

“I have found the work challenging and meaningful. I have great respect for my colleagues… I believe in the rule of law and the democratic system.”

He made no mention of political pressure but acknowledged a sense of duty to leave at the right time, allowing a smooth transition.

👩‍⚖️ Why Jackson’s Appointment Was Symbolic
Ketanji Brown Jackson clerked for Justice Breyer in 1999–2000.

Her selection was both historic (as the first Black woman on the Court) and symbolic—a “passing of the torch” from Breyer to a former mentee.

Breyer reportedly supported her nomination.

Categories
Uncategorized

Wrestling With God, or Merging Gods, Fascinating

stock here: A-Eye wanted to tell me a story, it’s below the line

this seems extreme As far as i know, the actual etymology is Is – ishtar babylonian god Ra – Egyptian God El – Canaanite God ie Satan

ChatGPT said:

You’re referring to a theory about the etymology of the word “Israel” that breaks it into:

  • Is = Ishtar (Babylonian goddess of fertility and war)
  • Ra = Ra (Egyptian sun god)
  • El = El (Canaanite high god, also the Hebrew word for “God”)

This breakdown is a modern, speculative interpretation and not how linguists or biblical scholars understand the etymology. Here’s a grounded breakdown:


📘 Actual Scholarly Etymology of “Israel”

In Hebrew, Israel is written יִשְׂרָאֵל (Yisra’el), and its meaning is generally taken as:

“He who struggles/wrestles with God”
(from the Hebrew verb śāra = to struggle/fight + El = God)

This comes from Genesis 32:28, where Jacob wrestles with a mysterious being (interpreted as an angel or God), and is renamed Israel:

“Your name shall no longer be Jacob, but Israel, for you have striven with God and with men, and have prevailed.”


🧪 About the “Ishtar-Ra-El” Theory

  • This theory is not supported by linguistic evidence, and it assumes a syncretism that isn’t present in the original Hebrew formation.
  • While it’s true that El was a Canaanite deity, by the time of the Hebrew Bible, El had become synonymous with the singular God of Israel (YHWH), and not Satan.
  • Ra and Ishtar have no linguistic or cultural ties to Hebrew etymology.
  • This theory is often found in fringe or esoteric spiritual circles, not in academic or biblical scholarship.

⚖️ Bottom Line

It’s understandable that these connections look compelling at a surface level (especially given how ancient religions influenced each other), but the standard scholarly view sees Israel as meaning “struggles with God”, rooted entirely in Semitic/Hebrew linguistic structure.

Let me know if you want to go deeper into the Canaanite origin of “El” or how Yahweh and El were merged in ancient Israelite religion — that’s a fascinating rabbit hole.

—————————-

you’re diving into one of the most fascinating and nuanced areas of ancient Near Eastern religion: how El, the Canaanite high god, and Yahweh, the national god of Israel, merged over time into what later Jews and Christians recognized as the singular God.


🧬 ORIGINS OF “EL” IN CANAANITE RELIGION

🌄 Who Was El?

  • El (literally “God” in Northwest Semitic languages) was the chief deity of the Canaanite pantheon.
  • He was seen as:
    • Father of gods (epithet: El Elyon = “God Most High”)
    • A wise, ancient figure, less involved in human affairs than younger gods like Baal.
    • Often depicted as a creator god, patriarchal, and benevolent.

El appears in Ugaritic texts (from Ras Shamra, 14th–13th c. BCE) as head of a divine council — a theme we’ll see mirrored in early Israelite writings.


🔥 WHO WAS YAHWEH?

  • YHWH (Yahweh) first appears not in Canaan, but possibly in the southern regions — Midian, Edom, or Seir — according to scholars analyzing Exodus and Deuteronomy.
  • Inscriptions like the Shasu of Yhw (in Egyptian texts, 13th c. BCE) suggest early worship of Yahweh in southern Transjordan.
  • Initially, Yahweh might have been a storm-warrior god, similar to Baal.

🔄 THE MERGER: HOW EL AND YAHWEH BECAME ONE

📜 Phase 1: Coexistence

Early Israelite religion likely distinguished Yahweh and El. We see evidence of this in Genesis 14, where El Elyon (God Most High) is referenced separately from Yahweh.

But El’s titles start appearing for Yahweh:

  • El Elyon (God Most High)
  • El Shaddai (God of the Mountain or Almighty)
  • El Olam (Everlasting God)

This suggests a theological syncretism — El’s identity and attributes were being absorbed into Yahweh worship.


📖 Phase 2: Yahweh Takes Over El’s Role

By the time of the monarchy (c. 1000 BCE), Yahweh fully assumes the roles previously attributed to El:

  • Creator
  • Father of the gods
  • Head of the divine council

Psalm 82 is a clear example:

“God (Elohim) stands in the divine assembly; He judges among the gods (elohim).”

This is an echo of the old Canaanite divine council (El as chief god among lesser deities), but now Yahweh is in that role.


👑 UNIFICATION INTO MONOTHEISM

📚 Phase 3: Monolatry to Monotheism

Originally, ancient Israel practiced monolatry — worship of one god (Yahweh) while acknowledging others.

But during the Babylonian Exile (6th c. BCE), a major shift happened:

  • Yahweh was no longer just Israel’s God.
  • He became the only true God, and the gods of other nations were declared false.
  • Isaiah 45:5: “I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God.”

At this point, El and Yahweh were fully merged not just in name but in concept — the singular God of Israel had subsumed all the roles of older regional deities.


🎯 Why This Matters

Understanding the Yahweh-El merger:

  • Reveals how religions evolve over time, blending local traditions with broader theological movements.
  • Undercuts overly simplistic or modern esoteric claims (like “Is-Ra-El” as a mix of gods from different regions) with solid archaeological and linguistic context.
  • Shows that the Bible itself preserves traces of this transition — it wasn’t hidden or erased.

🧠 Fun Facts You Might Appreciate

  • The name “Elohim” is a plural form of El, used throughout Genesis for God — a linguistic remnant of polytheism, though used singularly.
  • “Yahweh of Hosts” (YHWH Tzva’ot) suggests Yahweh commanded a divine army — another holdover from his warrior-god roots.
  • The golden calf incident in Exodus may reflect a clash between El worship (bull iconography) and the rising exclusive Yahweh cult.

If you want to go even deeper, we can explore:

  • The role of Asherah, El’s consort, and her controversial presence in early Yahweh shrines.
  • How Ugaritic mythology parallels parts of the Old Testament.
  • The transition from divine council theology to true monotheism in prophetic literature.

Would you like to continue down one of those threads?

Categories
Uncategorized

COVID Vaccine, Under Reporting Factor, A-Eye

stock here: So its seems like much of the Deaths from the injection occur pretty quickly, so those are more temporarily related (by time) and therefore seem to generate more cause and affect reporting to VAERS.

https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/download/1982/1420/8245?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Great question — here’s a breakdown of the source data for the Under-Reporting Factors (URFs) used in that chart and spreadsheet. These are estimates, not official CDC figures, but they are based on peer-reviewed research and expert analysis of VAERS data.

📚 VAERS URF Source References
🔹 1. General VAERS Reporting: URF 30–100×
Source: Miller, NZ. “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Diagnoses in Children Based on Vaccination Status.”

Estimate: URF range of 30 to 100 based on analysis comparing passive VAERS data with known event rates.

Citation: IJIRMS, 2021.
Read PDF (independent research)

🔹 2. Myocarditis (COVID-19): URF ≈ 31×
Source: McCullough et al. – Analysis of post-vaccine myocarditis using VAERS plus published rates from US and Israel.

Method: Compared VAERS-reported myocarditis cases to known incidence rates from peer-reviewed publications.

Estimate: ~31× underreporting of confirmed myocarditis.

Citation: ResearchGate or Corman et al. analysis.

🔹 3. COVID-19 Deaths Post-Vaccine (URF 10× and 36×)
Source: Open comments submitted to the CDC docket #CDC-2023-0028

Submitter: Steve Kirsch and collaborators (not peer-reviewed but detailed)

Estimate:

URF 10: Deaths within 7 days of COVID-19 vaccination

URF 36: Deaths within 42 days

Method: Compared background mortality rates and vaccine rollout with VAERS-reported deaths

Citation: CDC public submission

⚠️ Disclaimers
VAERS is a passive system, and the CDC itself acknowledges under-reporting is expected.

Official estimates of URF are rarely published because it varies by event severity, awareness, and population.

These estimates should be understood as analytical extrapolations, not definitive counts.

———————————-

Here’s a clearer overview of the under-reporting factor (URF) for VAERS, with data backed by research:

📊 VAERS Under-Reporting Factor (URF)
🧪 Findings from Studies
Relative URF Estimated at 30–100×

A study reported that the relative URF for VAERS may be in the range of 30 to 100

This suggests only 1–3% of actual adverse events are reported.

Myocarditis URF = ~31×

Researchers examining COVID-19 vaccine–related myocarditis found that for 3,078 VAERS-reported cases, adjusting by a URF of ≈31× yields an estimated ~95,418 true cases

.

URF for Death Reports (COVID-19 Vaccines)

A review indicated URF ≈10× for 7-day window and ≈36× for 42-day window following COVID-19 vaccination

🔍 Summary Table
Adverse Event Type Estimated URF
General VAERS Reporting 30×–100×
COVID-19 Myocarditis ~31×
COVID-19–linked Deaths 10× (7-day); 36× (42-day)

📈 What It Means in Practice
For every report in VAERS, there could realistically be dozens more unreported cases

A 30× URF implies that only ~3% of actual adverse events are documented

📋 Notes & Cautions
URF varies by event severity: serious events are more frequently reported

Estimates rely on disparate methodologies (survey data, medical chart audits, missing link studies)

URF applies statistical adjustment for passive surveillance systems, not proof of causation

Categories
Uncategorized

Texas Floods, Suspicious As Hell

stock here: my first thought was OMG, now the death toll is 67. My second thought was weather manipulation. To punish Texas for their stance on “immigrants” aka intentional invaders.

There was no warnings about the flood. How often do we hear this now? Think I could set up a high river warning for about $1000. They reviewed the idea in 2017 but a neighboringing community spent $2,000,000 for an early warning system, which is absurd, but still cheap in relation to lives lost.

I found this view of the camp

Categories
Uncategorized

The American Generations, Review

stock here, the younger they are, the less patriotic they are.

I went back to the article and made this table, wondering why the authors would not present the data in a table. That’s plain weird. Does length of reading time somehow increase their payments?

Here’s a breakdown of the most commonly accepted generational labels in the U.S., including Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z, based on birth years and general characteristics:

📊 Generational Chart
Generation Birth Years Approx. Age in 2025 Notable Traits
Baby Boomers 1946–1964 61–79 years old Post-WWII optimism, suburban growth, retirement focus
Generation X 1965–1980 45–60 years old Independent, skeptical, grew up pre-internet
Millennials 1981–1996 29–44 years old Tech-savvy, student debt, delayed home-buying
Generation Z 1997–2012 13–28 years old Digital natives, social media fluency, global-minded
(Gen Alpha) 2013–2025 est. 0–12 years old Growing up with AI, voice assistants, and tablets

💡 Key Points:
These generational definitions are cultural, not scientific — some variation exists between sources.

Millennials and Gen Z are often lumped together in media, but they differ greatly in worldview and tech adoption.

Gen X is sometimes called the “forgotten generation” but played a big role in shaping tech and business culture.

Boomers are often associated with postwar economic expansion and are a major force in retirement and healthcare discussions today.

Categories
Uncategorized

Exploring the Ashkenazi Genome

stock here

where are the current ashkenazi, highest percentage of the population of countries or local areas within countries
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Ashkenazi Jews are a significant ethnic group within the Jewish population, traditionally descending from Jews who lived in Central and Eastern Europe. Today, the largest concentrations of Ashkenazi Jews are found in a few specific countries and local areas with notable percentages within these populations.
Countries with the Highest Percentages of Ashkenazi Jews:

Israel:
    Population: Over 6 million Jews (Ashkenazi Jews make up approximately 47.5% of the Jewish population).
    Ashkenazi Jews are prominent in Israeli politics, business, and culture. Over time, many Jews from Europe migrated to Israel, particularly after the Holocaust.

United States:
    Population: Around 5.8 million Jews, with Ashkenazi Jews making up an estimated 90%.
    The Ashkenazi Jewish community is mainly found in major cities like New York, Los Angeles, and Miami, but New York City (particularly Brooklyn) holds the largest population of Ashkenazi Jews in the U.S.

Canada:
    Population: Canada has about 392,000 Jews, with a majority being of Ashkenazi descent.
    The largest concentration is in Toronto and Montreal, with significant Jewish communities contributing to the cultural fabric of these cities.

France:
    Population: Over 446,000 Jews, many of whom are Ashkenazi, although there is a large Sephardi Jewish population as well.
    Cities like Paris and Marseille have sizable Ashkenazi communities, particularly from migrations after World War II.

United Kingdom:
    Population: About 270,000 Jews, many of Ashkenazi descent, concentrated in London, particularly in areas like Golders Green and Stamford Hill.

Argentina:
    Population: 180,000 Jews, predominantly Ashkenazi, concentrated in Buenos Aires.
    Argentina has one of the largest Jewish populations in Latin America, with significant European Jewish immigration after World War II.

Local Areas within Countries:

New York City, USA: Specifically, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx have some of the highest concentrations of Ashkenazi Jews in the world.
Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, Israel: These cities have a large proportion of Ashkenazi Jews, contributing significantly to Israel's modern cultural and political life.
Paris, France: Ashkenazi Jews make up a large percentage of the Jewish population in the city.
Toronto and Montreal, Canada: Large Ashkenazi populations are integral to the Jewish communities here.

These areas reflect the post-WWII migrations, including to the United States, Israel, and elsewhere, and the continued presence of Ashkenazi Jews in influential sectors of society.
You said:
Why are shephardic jews usually not askenazi
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The terms Sephardic and Ashkenazi refer to two major Jewish ethnic groups that emerged from different historical and geographical origins, which is why Sephardic Jews are usually not considered Ashkenazi. The distinction is rooted in where these groups lived and how their customs, language, and culture developed over time.
Key Differences Between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews:

Geographic Origins:
    Sephardic Jews: Originally from the Iberian Peninsula (modern-day Spain and Portugal). After being expelled from Spain in 1492, many Sephardic Jews settled in areas around the Mediterranean, including North Africa, Turkey, Greece, and parts of the Middle East.
    Ashkenazi Jews: Descended from Jewish communities that settled in Central and Eastern Europe, including Germany, Poland, Russia, and other nearby regions.

Language:
    Sephardic Jews traditionally spoke Ladino, a Judeo-Spanish language that developed from Old Spanish with elements of Hebrew and other languages from the Mediterranean.
    Ashkenazi Jews traditionally spoke Yiddish, a language that developed from Middle High German, with a mixture of Hebrew, Slavic languages, and other influences.

Cultural Practices and Customs:
    The religious customs and liturgy of Sephardic Jews are rooted in the traditions that developed in Spain and North Africa, with influences from the Middle East. Their liturgical rites differ from those of Ashkenazi Jews, particularly in prayer styles, melodies, and the celebration of Jewish holidays.
    Ashkenazi Jews follow customs that evolved in Central and Eastern Europe, including distinct prayer practices, synagogue music, and holiday traditions.

Cuisine:
    Sephardic cuisine is influenced by Mediterranean and Middle Eastern flavors, featuring dishes like couscous, rice, olives, and rich spices such as saffron.
    Ashkenazi cuisine is more influenced by Eastern European traditions, with foods like gefilte fish, matzo ball soup, and dishes that use potatoes, cabbage, and meat.

Historical Experiences:
    Sephardic Jews faced the Spanish Inquisition and expulsion from Spain and Portugal, leading to widespread diaspora in the Mediterranean and North Africa.
    Ashkenazi Jews faced pogroms (violent riots aimed at Jews) and discrimination in Europe, particularly in Eastern Europe, but they also developed a rich cultural heritage despite persecution.

Why They Are Usually Not Considered the Same Group:

The differences between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews stem from centuries of living in distinct regions, with unique cultural, linguistic, and religious practices developing in each community. Though both groups share the same foundational Jewish faith, their customs, interpretations of Jewish law, and cultural expressions diverged due to their separate historical trajectories.

As a result, Sephardic Jews are usually not classified as Ashkenazi because of these historical and cultural distinctions, even though they are all part of the broader Jewish community. Both groups maintain their own unique identities within Judaism, though there has been some blending of traditions in modern times, particularly in places like Israel and the United States.
You said:
but ashkenazi is ultimately a genetic clarification, so comment on that in relation to the iberian jews, langauge and such therefore does not matter
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

When looking at the Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jewish populations from a genetic perspective, the distinctions between the two groups are more complex than just cultural, linguistic, or regional differences.
Genetic Background of Ashkenazi Jews:

Ashkenazi Jews trace their ancestry primarily to Eastern and Central Europe, though genetic studies show that they share a significant amount of Middle Eastern ancestry, which links them to the ancient Jewish populations. Over time, as Ashkenazi Jews settled in Europe, they experienced some genetic admixture with local European populations. Despite this, Ashkenazi Jews have remained a genetically distinct group for centuries, with relatively little intermarriage with non-Jewish populations until more recent times.

Genetic studies indicate that the Ashkenazi population is more homogeneous than other Jewish populations due to a founder effect—a small number of individuals gave rise to a large population over time, amplifying certain genetic traits and diseases common among Ashkenazi Jews (such as Tay-Sachs disease). Today, most Ashkenazi Jews can trace their lineage back to just a few thousand people who lived in Europe several centuries ago.

Genetic Background of Sephardic Jews:

Sephardic Jews, on the other hand, trace their ancestry to Iberia (Spain and Portugal) and were dispersed primarily after the Spanish Inquisition and expulsions in 1492. The genetic makeup of Sephardic Jews reflects their time in Iberia and their subsequent dispersal to North Africa, the Balkans, and the Ottoman Empire. Like Ashkenazi Jews, Sephardic Jews also retain significant Middle Eastern ancestry from the ancient Jewish population, though they, too, experienced genetic mixing with local populations in Iberia and the Mediterranean.

However, Sephardic Jews tend to show more genetic diversity than Ashkenazi Jews, likely due to their wider geographic spread after the Iberian expulsions and their interactions with a more varied set of local populations.

Genetic Differences Between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews:

Distinct Genetic Clusters: Genetic studies consistently show that Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews are distinct populations within the broader Jewish genetic continuum. While they share some common ancestry from the ancient Israelites, they have largely evolved as separate populations for the past millennium or more.
    Ashkenazi Jews have higher genetic similarities among themselves due to the relative isolation and founder effects in Eastern Europe.
    Sephardic Jews exhibit more genetic variation, reflecting their interactions with different host populations across North Africa, Southern Europe, and the Middle East.

The Role of Genetics Versus Cultural Differences:

While genetic studies show that both Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews have common Middle Eastern roots, these groups have experienced thousands of years of separation, during which their genetic lineages have diverged, albeit with some overlap.
Language (Yiddish for Ashkenazi Jews, Ladino for Sephardic Jews) and cultural practices are more superficial expressions of these deeper genetic differences, though they reflect the long-standing geographic separations between these populations.

Genetic Testing and Jewish Ancestry:

Genetic testing has become a popular way to explore Jewish ancestry. Ashkenazi Jews, because of their relative homogeneity, are often easily identified through genetic markers, while the genetic makeup of Sephardic Jews might reflect a more complex mixture due to their varied history.
Some Iberian Jews may share genetic markers with Ashkenazi Jews due to the historical movements of populations, but generally, Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews remain distinct genetic groups.

Summary:

The reason Sephardic Jews are usually not considered Ashkenazi is rooted in both cultural and genetic differentiation. While both groups share common ancient Jewish ancestry, centuries of separation, migration, and mixing with different populations have led to distinct genetic profiles. Sephardic Jews generally reflect more genetic diversity due to their broader dispersal across different regions after the expulsion from Spain and Portugal, while Ashkenazi Jews remained more isolated in Europe, leading to a relatively homogenous gene pool. Thus, genetics reinforces the distinction between these groups, making language and culture secondary markers of identity in this context.
You said:
such as Tay-Sachs disease). please expand on this
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Tay-Sachs disease is a genetic disorder that primarily affects Ashkenazi Jews but can occur in other populations as well. It is one of several genetic conditions that disproportionately affect Ashkenazi Jews due to what is known as a founder effect, where a small initial population passes down certain genetic mutations that become more prevalent over time within that population.
Overview of Tay-Sachs Disease:

Cause: Tay-Sachs is caused by mutations in the HEXA gene, which is responsible for producing an enzyme called hexosaminidase A. This enzyme is crucial for breaking down fatty substances (gangliosides) in nerve cells. Without enough functional hexosaminidase A, these fatty substances build up in the brain and spinal cord, leading to progressive neurological damage.

Inheritance: Tay-Sachs is an autosomal recessive disorder, meaning that both parents must be carriers of the mutated gene for their child to be affected. If both parents carry the gene, each child has a 25% chance of inheriting Tay-Sachs, a 50% chance of being a carrier, and a 25% chance of not inheriting the mutation.

Symptoms: Symptoms typically appear in infants around six months of age. These include:
    Loss of motor skills (e.g., sitting, crawling)
    Exaggerated startle response
    Seizures
    Progressive weakness and muscle stiffness
    Vision and hearing loss
    Cognitive decline

Tay-Sachs is a neurodegenerative disease, and most children with the condition pass away by the age of four or five.

Prevalence Among Ashkenazi Jews:

Carrier Rates: In the general population, the carrier rate for Tay-Sachs is about 1 in 300, but in Ashkenazi Jews, the carrier rate is significantly higher, around 1 in 27. This high prevalence is thought to be the result of the founder effect, where a small number of original Ashkenazi Jewish ancestors carried the mutation, and it became more common as the population grew.

Genetic Testing: Due to the higher carrier rate among Ashkenazi Jews, genetic testing for Tay-Sachs has been widely promoted in the community. Since the 1970s, genetic screening programs have greatly reduced the number of Tay-Sachs births in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Couples can be tested to determine if they are both carriers, and various reproductive options (such as in-vitro fertilization with pre-implantation genetic diagnosis) are available for carrier couples.

Founder Effect and Genetic Disorders in Ashkenazi Jews:

Besides Tay-Sachs, several other genetic disorders are more common in Ashkenazi Jews due to the founder effect. Some of these include:
    Gaucher disease: A condition in which fatty substances build up in certain organs, particularly the spleen and liver.
    Canavan disease: A neurodegenerative disorder caused by the breakdown of the central nervous system’s white matter.
    Bloom syndrome: A disorder that causes short stature, sun sensitivity, and an increased risk of cancer.

These conditions are linked to the relatively isolated nature of the Ashkenazi Jewish population over many centuries, which resulted in limited genetic diversity and a higher prevalence of certain mutations.
Tay-Sachs in Other Populations:

While Tay-Sachs is most commonly associated with Ashkenazi Jews, it can also affect other populations. French-Canadians, Cajuns in Louisiana, and Irish Americans have higher-than-average carrier rates for the disease, but the reasons for these elevated rates are not fully understood. Genetic mutations in the HEXA gene can appear in any population, though the prevalence is much lower outside these specific groups.

Conclusion:

Tay-Sachs disease serves as a prime example of how the genetic history of a population, particularly a relatively isolated one like the Ashkenazi Jews, can influence the prevalence of certain inherited disorders. Thanks to advances in genetic testing and public health initiatives, the occurrence of Tay-Sachs among Ashkenazi Jews has dramatically decreased in recent decades. However, it remains an important consideration in family planning for individuals from populations with a higher carrier rate.

Would you like more details on how genetic testing is conducted for Tay-Sachs or other related disorders?
You said:
what about recent scientific finding on genetics of ashkenazi per-dispoing them to mental illness
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Recent scientific research has delved into the genetic predisposition of Ashkenazi Jews to certain mental illnesses. Some of the key findings in this area highlight how the genetic bottleneck and founder effect that shaped the Ashkenazi Jewish population have also contributed to a higher prevalence of specific genetic mutations, which may be linked to mental health disorders. While there is ongoing research, several studies have shed light on genetic predispositions related to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and other psychiatric conditions.
Genetic Factors and Mental Illness in Ashkenazi Jews:

Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder:
    Several studies have identified a higher prevalence of genetic mutations linked to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Ashkenazi Jews. Specifically, research has pointed to variations in the NRXN1 gene (Neurexin 1), which is involved in synaptic function, playing a role in mental health disorders like schizophrenia.
    A 2014 study by the Weizmann Institute of Science and other collaborators found that certain mutations in the NRXN1 gene are disproportionately common in Ashkenazi Jews, possibly due to the founder effect. The NRXN1 gene is involved in brain connectivity, and mutations in this gene are associated with increased risks for neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.

Role of the Founder Effect:
    The Ashkenazi Jewish population underwent a genetic bottleneck roughly 700 to 1,000 years ago, significantly reducing genetic diversity. This has led to the retention of both beneficial and deleterious mutations, including those related to psychiatric disorders.
    In addition to Tay-Sachs and other well-known genetic conditions, researchers have discovered that copy number variations (CNVs), which are large deletions or duplications of DNA, are more common in Ashkenazi Jews and are linked to psychiatric conditions. CNVs in genes affecting brain function, such as those involved in synaptic transmission, are linked to conditions like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Research on Dopamine Pathways:
    There is ongoing research examining how dopamine receptor gene variants in Ashkenazi Jews may predispose some individuals to conditions like schizophrenia and ADHD. Dopamine dysregulation is a well-known factor in the development of psychosis and mood disorders.

Epigenetics and Environmental Influence:
    While genetics plays a significant role, researchers are also exploring how epigenetic factors (heritable changes in gene expression that do not involve changes to the DNA sequence) could interact with environmental stressors to trigger mental illness. Epigenetic changes may occur due to environmental pressures such as migration, trauma, and persecution, which have been part of Ashkenazi Jewish history and may contribute to mental health vulnerabilities.

Studies Highlighting Genetic Links:

A 2016 study published in Nature Communications found that Ashkenazi Jews carry certain rare genetic mutations more frequently than other populations, some of which are associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia.
Another study from Mount Sinai School of Medicine identified genetic overlaps between psychiatric disorders and neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting that certain genetic pathways involved in brain development might also predispose individuals to mental health conditions.

Conclusion:

The higher incidence of certain genetic mutations among Ashkenazi Jews has contributed to a deeper understanding of the biological underpinnings of mental illness, particularly in relation to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. However, it is important to note that genetics is only one factor, and environmental and epigenetic factors also play significant roles in the development of mental illness. The unique genetic history of the Ashkenazi Jewish population has provided researchers with valuable insights into the complex interactions between genes and mental health.

If you’d like more specific studies or resources on this topic, I can provide references or direct you to specific research findings.
You said:
Yes provide as many references as you can as hyperlinks, and check that they work, often your links don’t work
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Recent studies have indicated that Ashkenazi Jews, due to their unique genetic makeup, may have an increased predisposition to certain mental health conditions, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. These findings stem from the genetic bottleneck effect seen in this population, which has led to higher frequencies of specific gene variants associated with neurodevelopmental disorders.

One notable discovery involves the NDST3 gene, which is linked to critical neurodevelopmental processes such as axon formation and synaptic function. Research has shown that a specific variant of this gene is more prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews and may contribute to a higher risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder​
EurekAlert!
.

Moreover, studies highlight that while genetic predispositions exist, environmental factors also play a critical role in determining the onset and severity of these conditions. The combination of genetic insights from Ashkenazi populations and broader global research is providing scientists with better tools to understand the genetic underpinnings of severe psychiatric disorders and potentially develop targeted treatments.

To explore further on these studies and the implications of genetic research on mental health, you can read more from EurekAlert and Nature​
Nature

Categories
Uncategorized

The Full Armor of God, Europe Needs It

stock here

Her English is amazing

Categories
Uncategorized

Craig Ferguson

stock here: Master Class take notes, boys

Categories
Uncategorized

We All KNOW That Vaccines Are A Primary Cause of Autism, HHS Sec with a $1.7B Budget Breaks It Down With Tucker Carlson

stock here: I don’t know who Vivilant Fox is, BUT they must be well funded.

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/rfk-jr-unloads-disturbing-vaccine

Categories
Uncategorized

How Israel Ends

stock here: like a cornered animal, they could become very dangerous.

Summary of transscript below

Introduction & Perspective
Alon Misrahi is a former Israeli who now identifies as an anti-Zionist Arab Jew.

He frames this video as a one-time, serious examination of how he believes Israel as a state will collapse.

His background includes exposure to nearly every segment of Israeli society: secular, ultra-Orthodox, Ashkenazi, Mizrahi, military, and academia.

He positions himself as a credible insider-turned-outsider who sees Israeli society in denial and decline.

🔹 Central Thesis
Misrahi believes Israel is headed toward collapse, catalyzed by military overreach, delusional national discourse, and dependence on the U.S..

He identifies October 7, 2023 as a turning point — a signal to him that Israel cannot survive future regional conflicts.

🔹 Key Points Covered
Israel-Iran Conflict:

Claims Israel lost the war with Iran in military and psychological terms.

Iranian missile attacks demonstrated Israel’s vulnerability, especially despite Western defense support.

Suggests Western media hid the scale of Iranian success and Israeli military losses.

Mood in Israel:

Describes Israeli media and government as wildly propagandistic, falsely portraying economic and military success.

Interprets this as a sign of elite panic and mass denial.

U.S. Involvement:

Argues the U.S., particularly under Trump, will not commit troops to fight for Israel.

Sees the U.S. as managing optics, using diplomacy and limited strikes to protect its own interests, not Israel’s.

Prediction of Future Collapse:

Believes Israel will reinitiate a second war with Iran.

Predicts Iran will respond with a devastating but calibrated missile barrage targeting infrastructure — not civilians — to disable Israel without provoking nuclear retaliation.

This attack will:

Cripple Israeli command structures

Leave citizens in darkness and chaos

Collapse media, communications, and civil society

Iran’s goal: neutralize Israel militarily and politically, not exterminate its population.

🔚 Conclusion (to be continued…)
Misrahi ends by asserting that once this second phase of war occurs, Israel as a functioning state will disintegrate.

He plans a follow-up to detail the final phase of Israel’s end.

Let me know if you want this turned into a PDF, or if you’d like a critique of his claims through a historical or geopolitical lens.

Categories
Uncategorized

Nutrient Density and Training

stock here: so this is one of my gurus. Beef Liver and Swimming will change your life.