stock here: Josh Green was an integral part of the Lahaina Massacre.

stock here: Josh Green was an integral part of the Lahaina Massacre.
stock here: I made this short and sweet comment online
Watch the video of how the Airplane CRJ just drops like a rock, tumbling out of the sky in a severe downward parabola. How did it go from 140MPH to 30MPH in an instant? Just the collision of the Helo could not do this, the plane was 4 times heavier than the HELO.
So there was additional energy applied to the CRJ. Think about that.
Does the river vary this much in height? How does one reconcile these pictures?
I did a gamma correction so you can see the plane wreckage much better
I want to find more images of the plane wreckage
stock here: a valid concern, is these entrenched Federal leeches, when they go away….what are they going to do? How could they become part of a productive society.
My response to the AI “support” for this beast of a woman, who has presided over decades of Election abuses and shenanighans was this, the AI support is below.
If as quorum is 4 and there are 5 remaining, then that is just throwing stuff against the wall, and not a valid reason. It seems that if the president appoints them, then they should clearly be able to remove them. If that is not explicitly stated in the founding document, then what does the founding document state about process for removal? It’s seems clear that trumps next move should be to appoint her replacement, she she is serving 17 years past her 2002 6 year term.
First AI response:
The recent attempt by President Donald Trump to remove Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chair Ellen Weintraub has raised significant legal questions regarding the authority and process for dismissing FEC commissioners.
Legal Framework Governing FEC Commissioners:
Appointment and Tenure: The FEC comprises six commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, each serving staggered six-year terms. Commissioners may continue to serve beyond their term's expiration until a successor is confirmed.
Independence of the FEC: Established by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1974, the FEC is designed as an independent regulatory agency to enforce campaign finance laws. Its structure aims to insulate it from political influence, ensuring impartial oversight of federal elections.
Legal Considerations in Weintraub’s Dismissal:
Lack of Explicit Removal Provisions: The FECA does not explicitly grant the President authority to remove commissioners. This omission suggests that commissioners are intended to operate independently, free from executive branch interference.
Historical Precedent: There is no known instance of a President removing an FEC commissioner prior to the completion of their term. Weintraub, appointed in 2002 and serving beyond her term's expiration in 2007, has remained due to the absence of a confirmed successor.
Legal Challenges: Weintraub contends that her removal is unlawful, stating, "There's nothing in the Federal Election Campaign Act that suggests that that is an option." Legal experts, including former FEC Chair Trevor Potter, have echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that such an action violates the law and undermines the agency's independence.
campaignlegal.org
Implications of the Attempted Removal:
Potential Legal Disputes: This unprecedented move is likely to lead to legal challenges concerning the President's authority to dismiss commissioners of independent agencies.
Operational Impact on the FEC: The FEC requires a quorum of at least four commissioners to conduct official business. Weintraub's removal could jeopardize this quorum, hindering the agency's ability to enforce campaign finance laws effectively.
In summary, the attempt to remove FEC Chair Ellen Weintraub raises complex legal issues about the autonomy of independent regulatory agencies and the extent of presidential authority over such entities.
———————— AI response to my pushback (at top)
The recent attempt by President Donald Trump to remove Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chair Ellen Weintraub has sparked significant legal debate regarding the President’s authority in this context. Let’s delve into the legal framework governing the appointment and removal of FEC commissioners.
Appointment and Tenure of FEC Commissioners:
Appointment Process: FEC commissioners are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, serving staggered six-year terms.
fec.gov
Holdover Provision: According to 52 U.S.C. § 30106(a)(2)(B), commissioners may continue to serve beyond their term's expiration until a successor has been appointed and confirmed.
uscode.house.gov
Removal Process:
Lack of Explicit Removal Provisions: The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) does not explicitly outline a process for the removal of commissioners. This omission has led to differing interpretations regarding the President's authority to dismiss commissioners.
Legal Precedent: In Buckley v. Valeo (1976), the Supreme Court addressed the appointment process of FEC commissioners but did not provide a definitive ruling on the removal process. This leaves the question of removal authority somewhat ambiguous.
Current Situation:
Ellen Weintraub's Tenure: Appointed in 2002, Weintraub's term expired in 2007. She has continued to serve under the holdover provision, as no successor has been confirmed.
fec.gov
President's Attempted Removal: President Trump issued a letter dated January 31, 2025, stating that Weintraub was "hereby removed" from her position. Weintraub has contested this action, asserting that there is a legal process to replace FEC commissioners and that the President's action does not align with it.
businessinsider.com
Legal Considerations:
Independence of the FEC: The FEC is designed to function as an independent regulatory agency, insulated from direct political influence. Allowing unilateral removal by the President could undermine this independence.
Potential for Legal Challenge: Given the lack of explicit statutory guidance, Weintraub's removal could be subject to legal challenges, potentially resulting in a judicial determination of the President's removal authority in this context.
Path Forward:
Nomination of Successor: The President has the authority to nominate a successor for Weintraub. However, the nominee must be confirmed by the Senate before assuming the role. Until such confirmation occurs, Weintraub is legally permitted to continue serving.
In summary, while the President appoints FEC commissioners, the process for their removal is not explicitly defined in the governing statutes, leading to legal ambiguities and potential challenges.
Provide a summary of this, and a link to the full ruling
Legal Precedent: In Buckley v. Valeo (1976), the Supreme Court addressed the appointment process of FEC commissioners but did not provide a definitive ruling on the removal process
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Favicon
BUCKLEY v. VALEO, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
fec.gov
In the landmark case Buckley v. Valeo (1976), the U.S. Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of various provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended in 1974. The Court’s decision addressed several key aspects:
Contribution Limits: The Court upheld limits on individual contributions to political campaigns, recognizing the government's interest in preventing corruption and the appearance of corruption.
Expenditure Limits: The Court struck down limits on independent expenditures by individuals and groups, as well as limits on candidate expenditures from personal funds, citing First Amendment concerns.
Disclosure and Reporting Requirements: The Court upheld mandatory disclosure and reporting provisions, emphasizing transparency in the electoral process.
Federal Election Commission (FEC) Appointments: The Court found that the method of appointing members to the FEC, which involved appointments by Congress, violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. This led to changes in how FEC commissioners are appointed, ensuring compliance with constitutional requirements.
Notably, while the Court addressed the appointment process of FEC commissioners, it did not provide a definitive ruling on the process for their removal. This omission has led to ongoing debates regarding the extent of presidential authority in removing FEC commissioners.
For a comprehensive understanding, you can access the full text of the ruling here: Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
https://www.fec.gov/resources/legal-resources/litigation/Buckley.pdf
stock here: this guy is on my radar, for a while. He has real knowledge, and dives deep into ongoing issues. And with tariffs and trade all the rage, you might want him on your radar, say, weekly.
stock here: I have observed AI lying through it’s teeth and making mistakes.
Turns out it’s an anomaly. As Turley explained recently, he is among a small group of individuals who have been “effectively disappeared by the AI system.” Other GPT-banned names include Harvard’s Jonathan Zittrain, CNBC’s David Faber, and the Australian politician Brian Hood.
The common thread is that AI generated false stories about him and the other banned names. ChatGPT, Turley says, “falsely reported that there had been a claim of sexual harassment against me (which there never was) based on something that supposedly happened on a 2018 trip with law students to Alaska (which never occurred), while I was on the faculty of Georgetown Law (where I have never taught).”
ChatGPT’s solution to misinformation was to simply erase all mention of the names involved. It was an effective, albeit self-defeating, means of combating a real problem – a bit like curing a cancer by killing the patient outright. Today, the chatbot is no longer lying about Jonathan Turley because it is no longer saying anything about him at all.
This misinformation “cure” of disappearing a person completely from the AI universe is an obvious problem. Any student seeking to learn about a pivotal moment in American history (Trump’s impeachment) will not get the whole truth, at least not Turley’s part in it. AI misinformation is a real problem, but this kind of comprehensive censorship is a lazy and disadvantageous solution.
stock here, lets talk armament energies. Normally expressed in Joule’s, but can also be expressed in ft-lbf, which is what AI likes to calculate kinetic energy in.
stock here: part of all this stuff going on is people’s heads are just exploding with the rapidly changing landscape under Trump. Some of it is direct sabotage by the outgoing and entrenched parties.
Expect more. I expect better from the Japanese, but I guess they get TDS too….it’s personality type.
stock here: remember the initial lie / line that an airplane flew into a helicopter?
What has been really odd to me, from the get go, was the way the Plane seemed to lose all forward momentum, and immediately tumbled into the water. Also, the flash was huge. I have reviewed other in air plane crashes and the fire ball / flash is no where that instantaneous or huge. The Helo impacted primarily from the side, so the mass of the Helo impacting the plane would not reduce the forward momentum of the Plane.
So this has been bugging me for quite some time…the weird Airplane “tumble” into the river, a near complete exhaustion of forward momentum.
Energy must have been added in order to reduce the Momentum of the Plane, and to destroy it’s Kinetic Energy of significant 42,327,084 ft-lbf. 42 Million Foot Lbs.
Also, the much lighter Helo “continues” on through, although of course, taken to river pretty quick by gravity
Riddle me this folks, I did the calcs, took a shower and pondered the possibilities that produced these kinematics.
Who can chime in with the answer. Bear in mind the aircraft was split in half and the Helicopter “went through” in one piece.
There is only one answer I can come up with in the span of a shower.
————————————— Kinetic Energy Calc
Kinetic Energy Calculations for CRJ-700 and UH-60 Black Hawk
stock here: Been on my radar for half a year, finally making some progress. These were pretty cheap on Amazon, $29. The manual is definitely Chinese LOL. I am not sure I can adapt these units to eye improvement, LOL they come with eye blockers like a tanning salon
A-Eye, LOL
via red light therapy, and talk about the wavelengths too
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Recent scientific studies have explored the potential of red light therapy to improve eyesight, particularly in mitigating age-related visual decline. This therapy involves exposing the eyes to specific wavelengths of deep red light, which may enhance mitochondrial function in retinal cells.
Key Findings:
Improved Retinal Function: A study by University College London found that a single three-minute exposure to 670-nanometer (nm) deep red light in the morning led to a 17% improvement in color contrast vision among participants. This enhancement persisted for at least a week.
ucl.ac.uk
Mitochondrial Enhancement: The retina's photoreceptor cells, which have high energy demands, experience a decline in mitochondrial function with age. Exposure to long-wavelength red light (650–900 nm) has been shown to improve mitochondrial performance, increasing energy (ATP) production and reducing oxidative stress.
nature.com
Timing of Exposure: The benefits of red light therapy appear to be time-dependent. Morning exposure between 8 AM and 9 AM was effective, while afternoon exposure did not yield significant improvements. This suggests that the therapy's efficacy may be linked to the body's circadian rhythms.
ucl.ac.uk
Mechanism:
Mitochondria in retinal cells absorb specific wavelengths of red light, leading to enhanced energy production. This process helps counteract age-related declines in vision by improving the function of photoreceptor cells responsible for color vision and low-light adaptation.
aao.org
Considerations:
Wavelength Specificity: The therapeutic effects are most pronounced with deep red light around 670 nm. Other wavelengths within the 650–900 nm range may also be beneficial, but 670 nm has been the primary focus in recent studies.
nature.com
Safety and Accessibility: The studies utilized low-power LED devices for light exposure, which are considered safe for retinal health. This non-invasive approach could lead to affordable, home-based therapies for individuals experiencing age-related visual decline.
ucl.ac.uk
While these findings are promising, further research is necessary to fully understand the long-term effects and optimal protocols for red light therapy in vision improvement. Individuals interested in this therapy should consult with eye care professionals before initiating treatment.
Stock here: what could be we do instead of the $22B to USAID? Say a new department with none of the old perps. $2B budget.
A-Eye sayeth:
If the USAID budget were reduced from $22 billion to $2 billion, the U.S. would have to prioritize aid programs that have the greatest impact and strategic importance. With $2 billion (which is still a large amount), the focus should be on high-return investments that align with both humanitarian goals and U.S. national interests.
A 91% budget cut means aid programs must be laser-focused on areas where:
A small investment yields a massive impact.
U.S. interests are most directly supported.
Other funding sources (private sector, allies, or local governments) can contribute.
Top Priorities for a $2 Billion Budget
Category Proposed Annual Allocation Impact
Disaster Relief & Emergency Aid $600M Fast response to earthquakes, famines, and hurricanes.
Food Security & Agriculture $400M Supporting global food production to prevent mass migration and famine.
Global Health (Vaccination, Malaria, HIV/AIDS) $300M Life-saving medical aid in regions with high mortality rates.
Strategic Alliances & Security Partnerships $300M Aid to key allies (Israel, Taiwan, Ukraine, etc.).
Infrastructure & Clean Water $200M Rural electrification and water projects in friendly nations.
Microfinance & Entrepreneurship $200M Helping people start businesses instead of relying on long-term aid.
Instead of spreading aid too thin, funding should go where it matters most:
A. Disaster Relief & Emergency Aid ($600M)
Fast response fund for earthquakes, hurricanes, and conflicts.
Partnerships with Red Cross, World Food Programme (WFP), and Doctors Without Borders.
Only deploy in regions that are geopolitically important or align with U.S. values.
B. Food Security & Agriculture ($400M)
Shift from free food aid to agriculture training and investment.
Example: Instead of shipping food, invest in seeds, irrigation, and training to make regions self-sufficient.
C. Global Health ($300M)
Focus on disease eradication efforts (e.g., malaria, polio, tuberculosis).
Limited vaccine and HIV/AIDS support where U.S. interests align.
D. Strategic Aid to Key Allies ($300M)
Israel, Taiwan, Ukraine, and select NATO partners should receive direct support to counter China and Russia.
Small but targeted investments (cybersecurity, defense, counterterrorism training).
E. Infrastructure & Water ($200M)
Instead of building wasteful projects, focus on small, self-sustaining infrastructure.
Rural electrification, solar, and water purification projects.
F. Microfinance & Entrepreneurship ($200M)
Teach people to build their own businesses, not rely on U.S. aid.
Loans and training for small farmers, shop owners, and tech entrepreneurs.
Example: Support local African entrepreneurs instead of shipping aid.
With USAID cut back, U.S. allies and private entities should step up:
NATO & EU nations should increase their global aid spending.
Private charities and corporations can handle non-strategic aid.
Leveraging U.S. businesses (like Tesla, Google, and Microsoft) for tech-based aid solutions.
Conclusion
A $2 billion aid budget—properly allocated—could still support global stability, prevent humanitarian disasters, and serve U.S. interests. By cutting wasteful spending, focusing on self-sufficiency, and shifting some responsibilities to allies and private groups, the U.S. could spend far less while achieving real results.
stock here: substack is great, the new news. Go to the source:
by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
When studies compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children, they find serious and irreversible neurological, developmental, and immune-related health risks. This is likely one of the primary reasons that prevents Big Pharma and our regulatory agencies from conducting such studies — their flawed business model of pushing inadequately tested injections would collapse as parents learn the true risks of vaccination. It’s important to remember that ALL of the routine childhood vaccines were licensed WITHOUT proper long-term, placebo-controlled trials:
stock here: can we call this some disgusting irony?
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — As New Orleans church leaders braced for the fallout from publishing a list of predatory Catholic priests, they turned to an unlikely ally: the front office of the city’s NFL franchise.
What followed was a monthslong, crisis-communications blitz orchestrated by the New Orleans Saints’ president and other top team officials, according to hundreds of internal emails obtained by The Associated Press.
The records, which the Saints and church had long sought to keep out of public view, reveal team executives played a more extensive role than previously known in a public relations campaign to mitigate fallout from the clergy sexual abuse crisis. The emails shed new light on the Saints’ foray into a fraught topic far from the gridiron, a behind-the-scenes effort driven by the team’s devoutly Catholic owner who has long enjoyed a close relationship with the city’s embattled archbishop.
They also showed how various New Orleans institutions — from a sitting federal judge to the local media — rallied around church leaders at a critical moment.
Among the key moments, as revealed in the Saints’ own emails:
stock here: no voice recorder on this plane, no mayday or pan pan. Craft was 44 years old.
Clearly it was not a stall. Clouds at 400 feet so they were IFR (Instrument Flight Rules). My first thought is that they had a wing half blown off. Explosive charge in middle of wing, middle of fuel tank)
They were going down at 240 MPH nearly vertical at impact.
stock here: so this guy makes his own databases search tool and provides it online, for free. And he is awaken. My first search was “refugee”.
https://datarepublican.com/award_search/?keywords=refugee
His statement on the tool:Unlike older tools that only sift through nonprofit 990s (which don’t directly show government dollars), I’ve mined the USASpending database to create fuzzy matches between nonprofits and their linked government grants.
—————————————— Here is another search tool, he created, its called in part, A BFS, of Breadth-First Search
stock here: here is the string of evidence in a rolled up thread.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1870298918300393647.html
Some claim the father’s patent from December 2020 (what else happened in Dec 2020?) is useful in DNA Targeting, esp. COVID.
stock here: that was quick, not like how they hid and protected the DEI hire who shot Ashley Babbitt.
My hypothesis is that they needed to conceal her name, until ALL her social media could be wiped from existence. But also why is she escorting “Elite guests” like Ralph Lauren into the white house for a medal’s ceremony? That’s just weird. And why, as a Captain, was she the highest ranking person in that Helo, when she had less experience than both males.
Let’s be clear, this was a training flight as they state. This was a “check ride” in which the more experienced pilot (at 1000 hours, for comparison my flight instructor had 10,000 when he trained me) was evaluating her night flying abilities. There is a clear “pathway” that Helos use to transgress the airport, and they are restricted to 200 foot max elevation. She was around 400 foot high, far outside the pathway. It looks like she altered course twice in order to zero in on the passenger plane.
Rebecca Lobach: She looks pretty normal, although I do say, she has 450 hours of flying experience. I have around 200 hours of flying experience, and I would not let myself be PIC Pilot in Command at this point, although I would co-pilot with glee, and in a pinch I am quite sure I could bring a big bird down if the pilot had a stroke. But 450 hours is NOT a lot of hours. Notice how their first reaction was to “juice” it to 500 hours. Small lies give away a larger narrative.
But there are “trans” pilots flying military planes…..
On January 29, 2025, a tragic mid-air collision occurred over the Potomac River near Washington, D.C., involving an American Airlines regional jet and a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter. All 67 individuals aboard both aircraft perished in the accident.
The helicopter’s crew included Captain Rebecca Lobach, a 28-year-old pilot from Durham, North Carolina. She was undergoing her annual night evaluation flight at the time of the incident. Captain Lobach had accumulated over 450 hours of flight experience and was a member of the 12th Aviation Battalion at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. In addition to her military service, she had served as a White House social aide during President Joe Biden’s administration.
people.com
The collision is currently under investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and other relevant authorities. Preliminary findings indicate conflicting altitude readings between the two aircraft, but a definitive cause has yet to be determined.
apnews.com
This incident has deeply affected multiple communities, including the military and the figure skating world, as several passengers on the flight were young skaters and coaches returning from a training camp.
thetimes.co.uk
stock here: This wiggle dance needs to be seen be hundreds of millions.
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/3772705802792-scoopz-newsbreak-fyp?s=ws_native
Spread the word
stock here: This is FaF. Fishy as Eff.
Some are saying “this is not the pilot’s fault” it is all about the understaffed ATC….not so
This is absolutely the pilots fault, they flew directly into that plane, they changed course and were at the perfect, and illegally high altitude to cause the collision. That is, unless their HELO was under remote control, which does exist.
Maybe she was a Trans and about to be thrown out of the job that she loved.
stock here: seen on ZH, the first comment, an Apologist, who is either a troll (most likely) or a useful idiot who thinks he sees clearly…it’s all because they are dumb and/or incompetents.
————————————————————-
3 hours ago(Edited)removelink
It was entirely self inflicted.
Stop looking for some scary and mysterious external threats to justify your problems.
The essential truth (about entirely home grown) criminals and conspiracies, is that they need to resort to such actions precisely because they are dumb and incompetent. Lying, subversion, violence and intimidation is exactly what they do because they are just about smart enough to manage that.
Positive virtues are entirely beyond them (which is why they are SO hostile to meritocracy)
Malignant and venal self interest (psychopathy) is exactly enough to generate the corruption of the West.
Physician – heal thyself.play_arrowplay_arrow6
———————————————————
Onthebeach6
3 hours ago(Edited)removelink
Stop excusing mass murderers.
This has been a decades long attack on the West by a bunch of Malthusian globalists obsessed with global depopulation for well over a century.
They have used global warming to hoax the masses into destroying their own cheap energy production.
They have opened up borders in Europe and the US to enable invasions by peoples who have nothing in common with the original inhabitants.
They have replaced meritocracy with kakistocracy – “government by the least suitable or competent citizens of a state” or “a state or society governed by its least suitable or competent citizens”.
They have injected 5.6 billion people including 70% of Americans with depopulating poison.
They are shutting down meat and dairy production in order to accelerate the process.play_arrow12play_arrow