stock here: I have been saying for years….give a traditionally low power sector, power, and what will they do…….anything their paymasters tell them to do. Note: FEMA did NOT say they fired this black female, they only said she was “removed from her role”.
Marn’i Washington, a crew leader for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in Highland County, Florida, was terminated after instructing her team to avoid providing assistance to homes displaying support for President-elect Donald Trump. This directive led to at least 20 homes being skipped during disaster relief efforts in Lake Placid, Florida. Conservative Brief
FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell condemned Washington’s actions, stating they violated FEMA’s core values of impartiality and commitment to assisting all disaster survivors, regardless of political affiliation. Criswell emphasized that such behavior is unacceptable and that the agency will hold individuals accountable for such conduct. The Washington Post
The incident has sparked discussions about the importance of neutrality in disaster response and the ethical responsibilities of federal employees in serving the public without bias.
FULL STATEMENT: “FEMA helps all survivors regardless of their political preference or affiliation and we are deeply disturbed by this employee’s actions. While we believe this is an isolated incident, we have taken measures to remove the employee from their role and are investigating the matter to prevent this from happening ever again. The employee who issued this guidance had no authority and was given no direction to tell teams to avoid these homes and we are reaching out to the people who may have not been reached as a result of this incident. This is a matter that we take extremely seriously and we are doing everything we can to make sure all survivors receive support from FEMA. To date, we have helped over 365,000 households impacted by both Hurricanes Helene and Milton in the state of Florida and have provided over $898 million in direct assistance to survivors. We are horrified that this took place and therefore have taken extreme actions to correct this situation and have ensured that the matter was addressed at all levels. Helping people is what we do best and our workforce across the agency will continue to serve survivors for as long as it takes.”
stock here, consider the epic speech by Harris to be just part of their next play….and part of that is that J6 by Trump is a reason for his exclusion from the chance to get to the presidency.
Seems like whatever drugs they were giving to Biden, they gave her a cocktail, and it helped her pull off this “departing” speech, less cackling.
I’ll summarize the AI….they want gun bans, they want baby murder to not just OK but to be enshrined again, they want acceptance of the outcomes to invalidate prior unacceptance of the past fake outcomes with 80,000,000 votes….and to disqualify Trump because of J6.
Everyone is your neighbor…even if they are here illegally.
“Don’t Ever Listen to somebody to tells you that something is impossible, just because it has never been done before”…..That fact something has never been done before, makes “it’s” soon in the future completion, to have a diminishingly small likelihood. But reality and likelihood are not part of what she is trying to talk about or portray….there is a whole different plot. Then she speaks of a “law of history” only when it is darker can you see the stars…..fill the light with the light of a billion billion stars of truth and service… and then I think she says “a Jew”. These are the closing comments, maybe it was Adieu. LOL her husband is a Jew, the “First Gentleman”, the “new masculinity”.
Transcript by AI: The first youTube I saw only had 414 views and 3 comments, this one has a ton of comments, that are 80% negative on Harris. AI summarized these comments at the far bottom.
Certainly! Here’s a more detailed outline of Kamala Harris’s concession speech with headers and bullet points to help organize it over about 2.5 pages:
Kamala Harris’s Concession Speech: A Message of Unity, Resilience, and Hope
Kamala Harris delivered a heartfelt concession speech following the presidential election results, congratulating Donald Trump on his victory. Her address emphasized the strength of democratic principles, the importance of unity, and the power of persistence. Through calls for resilience and hope, she encouraged Americans to continue fighting for shared values and a brighter future. A Commitment to Democracy and Unity
Congratulating the President-Elect: Harris confirmed her conversation with Trump, congratulating him and promising a peaceful transition of power.
Honoring Democratic Principles:
She highlighted the importance of respecting election results, which she views as essential to democracy.
This respect distinguishes democracy from other forms of government, like monarchy or tyranny.
Unity Over Division:
Harris spoke of a vision where Americans from all backgrounds are united by a love for their country.
Emphasized commonalities over differences, urging citizens to remember that they have “more in common than what separates us.”
Reaffirming Core American Values
Loyalty to the Constitution:
Harris stressed that loyalty should be directed not at a single leader or party but at the Constitution, conscience, and faith.
The Fight for Freedom and Justice:
Though conceding the election, Harris made it clear she would not give up on the ideals that motivated her campaign:
Freedom and opportunity for all.
Equality and fairness.
Respect and dignity for every individual.
She emphasized that these values are essential to America’s identity and its democratic principles.
Encouraging the Next Generation and Persistence
Message to Young Americans:
Acknowledged the disappointment felt by supporters, especially younger voters.
Urged them to stay hopeful, reminding them that setbacks are temporary and perseverance is key.
Encouraged young people never to believe that something is “impossible” just because it hasn’t been done.
Resilience and Hard Work:
Harris praised “hard work” as a path to joy and fulfillment, stating that “the fight for our country is always worth it.”
Reiterated that positive change may take time, but persistence is vital.
Fighting for Core Issues
Women’s Rights:
Harris reaffirmed her commitment to protecting women’s autonomy over their own bodies.
Gun Control:
Committed to continuing efforts to make schools and streets safer by tackling gun violence.
Fundamental Rights and Freedoms:
Advocated for equal justice and the rule of law, noting that every person has certain “fundamental rights and freedoms” that must be protected.
Path Forward: Taking Action and Leading by Example
Multiple Avenues of Engagement:
She emphasized the importance of continuing the fight for change through various means:
Voting and political engagement.
Judicial actions and legal advocacy.
Positive community interactions and respectful treatment of others.
Setting an Example of Kindness and Respect:
Encouraged Americans to live by values of kindness and compassion.
Encouraged “lifting each other up” and seeing everyone as a “neighbor.”
Finding Hope in Dark Times
Drawing Inspiration from Others’ Strength:
Harris reflected on stories of resilience from her career, where people found strength in adversity.
She urged people to let these stories inspire continued efforts for justice and fairness.
Optimism and Light in Dark Times:
Closing with an analogy, Harris spoke of a potential “dark time” but emphasized the possibility of filling the sky with light—hope, optimism, truth, and service.
Closing Remarks: A Call to Action and Hope
Encouragement to Stay Engaged:
Harris encouraged all Americans to remain active, organized, and committed to their communities.
She urged people to focus on building a better future collectively.
Final Blessing:
Concluded with words of gratitude and a blessing for the United States.
In her concession, Kamala Harris delivered a strong message of resilience and commitment to core American values, emphasizing the importance of unity, hope, and hard work in the face of challenges. Her speech serves as a reminder that democracy thrives through shared dedication to justice, freedom, and opportunity for all.
Here’s a breakdown of the comments on Kamala Harris’s speech, grouped by supporters and detractors, along with a count for each type. Supporters (18 Comments)
These commenters expressed positive sentiments about Kamala Harris’s speech, character, or political impact. They appreciated her message of hope, viewed her as a strong leader, or respected her for trying to unite and inspire Americans.
Examples:
"She gave a great speech; she gave us hope."
"Wonderful speech, wonderful person."
"She showed grace, class, and dignity… even in defeat."
Count: 18 supportive comments
Detractors (90 Comments)
These commenters were critical of Harris’s speech, political record, or personal style. Common critiques included her perceived lack of charisma, repetition, and perceived insincerity. Some suggested her speech was “lackluster” or that she incited division. Others criticized her past actions as a prosecutor or questioned her qualifications and dedication.
Examples:
"She’s the epitome of evil; her laugh is evil."
"What a consistent joke."
"She has no charisma at all."
"Good riddance."
Count: 90 critical comments
Summary: In this comment section, detractors heavily outweighed supporters, with criticisms focusing on her style, past actions, and perceived insincerity. Supporters focused on her resilience, grace, and the hope she instilled for progressive causes.
stock here, this was a comment, but deserves to be an article.
The genocide extended to Lebanon is a diversion in order to lure Hezbollah and the resistance elsewhere while the zionist wage its ethnic cleansing attacks on Gaza and the West bank with full complicity of the US and most western countries (UK, EU/NATO controlled countries like France, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, etc…) while the zionist wage its ethnic cleansing attacks on Gaza and the West bank with full complicity of the US and most western countries (UK, EU/NATO controlled countries like France, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, etc…)
After year-long genocide, Israeli military hires private firms to flatten buildings in Gaza presstv . ir / Detail /2024/11/05/736667/Netizens-erupt-in-outrage-as-Israeli-company-streams-genocidal-flattening-of-Gaza
In the Israeli regime’s 396 days of onslaught on Gaza as of Tuesday, two-thirds of the total structures in the narrow strip have been damaged, according to the United Nations Satellite Centre (UNOSAT).
Those 66 percent of damaged buildings in Gaza account for 163,778 structures in total.
“Israeli military is employing private civilian companies & non-military personnel in flattening homes in Rafah,” he wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter. “Meshek Afar Ltd has been in the city for 3 days. An employee now in Rafah uploaded this below & said that its CEO will flatten a mosque tomorrow,” he added, sharing a video of Meshek Afar CEO Alon Elgali and another company staff navigating through the rubble in Rafah, a city in southern Gaza.
Has Israel already started colonizing Gaza? Footage shows that non-military personnel from private Israeli companies are engaged in flattening buildings in Rafah, Gaza.#GazaGenocide pic.twitter.com/ZlTGTO6Ay0 — Palestine Highlights (@PalHighlight) November 4, 2024
‘Ethnic cleansing on industrial scale’ “The depravity knows no bounds. The goal has always been the ethnic cleansing of Palestine,” wrote Radia Hennessey, a human rights advocate, on X.
She further noted that Alon Elgali, the CEO of Meshek Afar, must not evade legal accountability, as civilians are also subject to prosecution for war crimes under the jurisdiction of both the International Criminal Court (ICC) and national courts.
REMEMBER THE NAME OF THIS CRIMINAL VS HUMANITY: Alon Elgali EO of Meshek Afar
The attack on Lebanon is a diversion, the zionists are taking over Gaza and the West Bank, this is genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Here’s a summary of key points from the October 30 Lahaina recovery meeting:
Introduction and Prayer: The meeting began with logistical information about facilities and a prayer for the community's healing and support.
Updates and Resources:
Attendees were reminded to use 211 for disaster case management.
Photos and information were shared from recent events, including a blessing ceremony at K Village.
An open house for the long-term recovery plan took place with 200 people in attendance. The plan covers 40 projects, and feedback can be provided online.
Upcoming Events:
A community meeting on a proposed 16-acre school site in the Lahaina area is scheduled for November 19.
Other future agenda items include cultural monitoring of debris clearing and updates from All Hands and Hearts on ineligible debris removal.
Ongoing Programs:
FEMA presented its rental assistance and direct housing programs, explaining eligibility, timelines, and conditions. Some programs require financial review every 30 days, and rent payments for FEMA-provided housing will start on March 1, 2025.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) outlined available low-interest disaster loans for homeowners, renters, businesses, and nonprofits, as well as deadlines for applying.
Temporary Debris Site (TDS):
Air quality, water monitoring, and other environmental checks are ongoing at the TDS. Plans are in place to safely move debris to a permanent site starting around 2025, using upgraded routes to minimize traffic impact.
The TDS will eventually be restored to its original state.
Community Concerns:
Residents expressed frustration with housing and rental assistance formulas, specifically HUD fair market rent rates, which many feel are inadequate given the high local cost of housing. They voiced concerns that policies are unsustainable, forcing them to dip into rebuilding funds to cover living costs.
Suggestions were made for FEMA to revisit these formulas and engage HUD in potentially adjusting fair market rent rates to better align with Maui’s unique housing challenges.
FEMA and SBA Responses:
FEMA representatives emphasized their programs’ legal limitations but assured attendees that individual cases are reviewed for potential additional support.
The SBA reminded attendees of additional assistance options for various disaster recovery needs.
Community Input: Residents called for FEMA and other agencies to take immediate legislative steps to address the unique housing challenges and provide more flexibility in policies to prevent further displacement.
This summary captures the main themes discussed, with community members urging FEMA and other authorities to advocate for policy adjustments that address specific local needs.
stock here: I ran this poll on Nextdoor, and my area is fairly conservative, but after the tribal lefties got wind of it, they were able to push the poll to 60% trump 40% Harris, which would have a little more support for Harris than what street signs would indicate.
Of course, NextDoor then banned me until November 6th, LOL day after the election! Because my comment was not limited to the local neighborhood. They are primarily leftists authoritarian ass-hats. Only good for finding lost pets, LOL.
stock here, below the graphic is a Discussion of Margin of error. The closer a poll or election is to 50%, the higher the margin of error. At 10% the margin of error becomes quite a bit smaller. My “conclusion” is at the far bottom if you don’t want to follow the whole discussion.
On a poll with 3842 votes what is the “margin of error” and how is it calculated ChatGPT said: ChatGPT
The “margin of error” in a poll is a measure of how much you can expect the poll results to vary from the true population values. It’s calculated based on the sample size (the number of votes) and the desired confidence level, typically 95%. How to Calculate the Margin of Error (MoE)
For a poll with a sample size of 3,842 votes:
Determine the Confidence Level: Most polls use a 95% confidence level, which corresponds to a Z-score of 1.96.
Calculate the Sample Proportion (p): If the poll result shows, for example, 50% for a particular response, then p = 0.5. If the proportion is unknown, 0.5 is commonly used as it provides the largest margin of error, giving a conservative estimate.
Calculate the Standard Error (SE):
SE=p(1−p)n
SE=np(1−p)
where n=3,842n=3,842.
Calculate the Margin of Error:
MoE=Z×SE
MoE=Z×SE
For a 95% confidence level, Z = 1.96.
Let’s calculate it based on a sample proportion of 0.5. Example Calculation
Standard Error (SE):
SE=0.5×(1−0.5)3842=0.253842≈0.008
SE=38420.5×(1−0.5)
=38420.25
≈0.008
Margin of Error (MoE):
MoE=1.96×0.008=0.0157 or 1.57%
MoE=1.96×0.008=0.0157 or 1.57%
Result
The margin of error for this poll, with 3,842 votes, would be approximately ±1.57% at a 95% confidence level.
This means the true percentage could vary by about 1.57% above or below the reported poll result if the poll is unbiased and random. You said: on this same poll if the no votes were 381 and the yes was the remainder then would p=.1, and what would the calc then be ChatGPT said: ChatGPT
Yes, if the “No” votes were 381 out of 3,842 total votes, the proportion for “No” (pp) would indeed be: p=3813842≈0.1 p=3842381≈0.1
With this updated pp, we can recalculate the margin of error. Updated Calculation Steps
Determine the Sample Proportion (p):
p=0.1p=0.1
Calculate the Standard Error (SE):
SE=p(1−p)n=0.1×(1−0.1)3842
SE=np(1−p)
≈0.0048
Calculate the Margin of Error (MoE): Using the Z-score for a 95% confidence level, Z=1.96Z=1.96:
MoE=Z×SE=1.96×0.0048≈0.0094
MoE=Z×SE=1.96×0.0048≈0.0094
Result
The margin of error, given p=0.1p=0.1, would be approximately ±0.94% at a 95% confidence level.
This smaller margin of error reflects the lower variability when the proportion pp is further from 0.5. You said: what does margin of error actually mean though, like talking to a freshman in highschool ChatGPT said: ChatGPT
The margin of error tells you how much you can trust the results of a poll or survey. It gives a range that the real answer is likely to fall within if you asked everyone, not just the people in the poll.
Imagine you’re trying to figure out what everyone in your school thinks about a new lunch option, but instead of asking every student, you only ask 100 people. Let’s say 60% of them say they like it. You might think that means about 60% of the whole school likes it. But because you only asked a sample (the 100 people), the real percentage could be a little higher or lower.
The margin of error tells us how much higher or lower that percentage might realistically be. For example, if the margin of error is ±5%, it means that the real percentage of people who like the lunch option could be anywhere from 55% to 65%.
In short:
Poll result: 60% say “yes”
Margin of error: ±5%
Real range: The true percentage of people who like it is likely between 55% and 65%.
So, the margin of error helps us understand how close the poll result is to the “truth” about the entire group! You said: so in my example then the no votes could vary from 10% to 9.06% or up to 10.94, it has nothing to do with is there a chance that there are more no votes than yes votes ChatGPT said: ChatGPT
Exactly! The margin of error simply tells us how much the reported percentage could vary around the poll’s result. In your example:
You found that 10% of the sample voted "No."
With a margin of error of ±0.94%, the true percentage of "No" votes among everyone could range from 9.06% to 10.94%.
But the margin of error doesn’t suggest any possibility of “No” having more votes than “Yes” in this case because:
The overall result: "Yes" votes are significantly higher than "No" votes in the original poll.
The margin of error: It’s only a slight range around the calculated percentage.
So, while the percentage for “No” might be a little higher or lower, it’s still within a small range around that 10%, and the gap between “Yes” and “No” would still be large enough that “Yes” remains the majority.
In short, the margin of error lets us say, “The true ‘No’ percentage is probably close to what we found, but there’s a small range of uncertainty.” It doesn’t change the outcome of “Yes” being the clear winner in this poll!
stock here: They suck up every lie, project onto the people who are actually much closer to the truth, and then learn little phrases like gaslighting and use them repeatedly. https://x.com/pattimor2011
She’s a big fan of Yuval Harari
Doesn’t Harari look like he would be an excellent concentration camp “administrator”, or even “science experimenter”.
“Gun Control is a Great Idea”. It’s Pretty Clear Folks. She will do anything that they want her to do. 100 days until executive action…”we tried” and Congress wouldn’t listen.
The Japanese expert panelist’s testimony is critical for understanding the magnitude of the moment. Read the English subtitles…stop the vid to capture the fast-talking scientists words. It’s not just what they are saying. Note their manner; the sense of urgency, the sense of shame. This happened on their watch; they are pissed. Unusual behavior for Japanese academics but it fits what might be expected in a moment of extreme crisis. Following the Fukushima meltdowns of 2011, these guys are not going to knell to authority this time.
This is an urgent call for help for Reiner Fuellmich who is being tortured in prison in Germany for a crime he didn’t commit.
It’s an urgent call for help because on October 18, in his previous court appearance, Reiner said, for the first time ever, that he was not well. Today, October 25, the presiding judge asked him how long he would be able to be in the trial today. He answered, “Not long.” Then the hearing was interrupted. On October 18, it was revealed that Reiner had undergone, for 3 weeks, extreme sleep deprivation: in the cell next to his, a prisoner had been placed who screamed non-stop night and day.
Elsa Schieder, lifelong lover of truth and justice, in contact with him, has followed the case closely.
Reiner Fuellmich, high-profile lawyer who won lawsuits against Volkswagen and German banks. Key figure in the Corona Committee (https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-1-EN:0) which documented every aspect of the plandemic through interviews with key people, both in English and German. Now a political prisoner.
On Oct 12, 2023, abducted from Mexico to Germany and arrested. A fabricated case, which would anyway be civil not criminal. In a maximum security prison since his arrest. A clearly biased judge. Taken to court in handcuffs and ankle shackles. Since early May, in isolation. Increasingly tortured, most recently through 3 weeks of non-stop severe sleep deprivation. On October 18, for the first time, Reiner says he is not feeling well. As stated, on Oct 25, the hearing was interrupted due to his ill health. People are worried.
“Sunlight is the best disinfectant.” A favorite saying of Reiner’s. The world needs to know, through interviews worldwide.
The case bring to light the utterly corrupted “justice” systems, and the mental as well as physical torture deliberately inflicted, clearly intended to break this man.
The ordeal of Julian Assange again without mainstream media coverage.
Why is this being done? Reiner began by exploring what was happening with the PCR tests. He has gone on to explore who is behind what is going on. He has a large reach and huge popularity. In both cases, one also comes to the personality traits of the abusers, notably the utter lack of empathy. For more on this, I recommend Andrew Lobaczewski’ s brilliant Political Ponerology.
And who am I – Elsa Schieder, PhD? Writer, professor, coach, poet. Truth-seeker, truth-teller and life-lover. Lifelong questioner. Thinker. Interviewer.
Then, I am in contact with Reiner, largely through his wife.
I interviewed Reiner twice before his abduction to Germany. When he was arrested, I could find nothing in English, so I translated the little I found in German. The posting has continued for over a year now.
I would love to tell you and your audience more. In fact, it is urgent for the message to go out worldwide, about: – the amazing achievements of Reiner Fuellmich, – the current extreme danger to Reiner’s life through present-day prison torture, – his current extreme suffering, intentionally inflicted, more present-day prison torture, – the huge injustices he faces within a patently corrupt system.
The goal: – freedom for him, – exposure of the corruption, – and massive needed change.
Needed: Many voices, especially those with a wide reach, who can present the stories of Reiner Fuellmich plus the massive corruption and deliberate abuse.
“If we didn’t need some more prisons for some sociopaths, for example those responsible for the pandemic, the wars, the massacres like in Gaza and the corrupt of the system, I would be in favor of abolishing prisons.” This statement was recorded by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the phone of his lawyer, Katja Wörmer.
This video completely exposes Peterson’s anti-White agenda and his strategy for implementing it. Any Peterson fans who are not beyond saving will be deprogrammed by watching this video.
Jordan Peterson’s primary goal is to neutralize the political right and White identity. He does not care about the Marxist take over of our nations, in fact he was hired by the United Nations to help usher it along. Peterson’s only reason for stepping into the limelight was because he saw a massive right wing backlash fomenting, and realized it was going to destroy the left.
His job is to implement “plan B”, to steer the rising tide of nationalism into an impotent cul-de-sac of centrist individualism, giving our enemies just enough time to tip the demographic balance of our countries so that our destruction is sealed.
Peterson is explicitly targeting young White males for indoctrination with an insidious political ideology he calls radical individualism. He has created a pseudo-religion self-help cult; he is delivering his ideology to the disaffected youth by combining it with a self-help regimen wrapped in empty religious metaphor.
While our enemies are working tirelessly to destroy our nations in a ruthlessly calculated and organized fashion, Jordan Peterson is brainwashing a generation of young White men to be atomized individuals who perceive group cooperation based on ethnic identity and nationality as the height of evil.
EXCLUSIVE: Kamala Harris Has All The Hallmarks Of A CIA Mind Control Slave & Is Potentially A Real World Manchurian Candidate@RealCandaceO Reveals Her Investigation pic.twitter.com/t5Q8yY9x3O
stock here, in addition, I think the FBI will start murdering “migrants” across every state, and then “leaking” Trump conversations about brutal and mass deportations, intentionally keeping the kids here, and deporting the parents, these will be AI generated. Then groups of migrants will get funding from the leftists that took money back from Ukraine “aid” and start revolting and burning down cities and gov offices. These assholes don’t need all of us dead, but 10,000,000 would be acceptable to them.
The “Scenic Pit” in Richfield, Wisconsin, is an abandoned quarry that its owners, Danah and Thomas Zoulek of Scenic Pit LLC, aim to restore by filling it with clean fill—uncontaminated soil and materials from construction sites. Their plan includes eventually developing the site into residential lots. Wisconsin Law Journal
The Village of Richfield has opposed this project, citing concerns over zoning and environmental impacts. Initially, the property was zoned in a manner that allowed quarry restoration. However, after learning of the Zouleks’ intentions, the Village rezoned the property to Rs-1, a designation prohibiting landfill operations, including clean fill activities. CaseText
The Village also required the Zouleks to obtain several local approvals, such as amending the comprehensive plan, rezoning the property, applying for a conditional use permit, and securing construction storm water and erosion control permits. The Zouleks contended that, under Wisconsin state law, clean fill facilities are regulated by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and are exempt from certain local approvals. Stafford Law
This dispute led to legal action, culminating in the Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruling in favor of Scenic Pit LLC in 2017. The court determined that the state’s regulatory framework preempted local zoning ordinances in this context, allowing the Zouleks to proceed without the additional local approvals the Village sought to impose. CaseText
The Village’s opposition appears rooted in concerns about environmental impacts, community aesthetics, and adherence to local zoning laws. Despite the court’s decision, the case highlights the tension between state regulations and local governance in land use and environmental matters.
