stock here, this is unusual. Also, Alex tours Moscow, What a beautiful city, and he covers the Z.

stock here: note in the last paragraph, they pretend that Trump himself fired this female. A Journalism student from Northwestern University.

——————————

While the circumstances of Caudle’s nomination as the replacement for Adm. Lisa Franchetti, whom Trump fired without explanation, were controversial, Caudle breezed through his hearing, suggesting he will be easily confirmed on a bipartisan basis.

——————————-

Her replacement, is suspiciously looked at as being against Marxism, in the US military. hmmmmm. Franchetti was fired by Hegseth.

Politico does the same……

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/14/caudle-navy-chief-top-contender-00008888

Very interesting conversation on Reddit….

Fleet Forces Commander Caudle Nominated as Next Chief of Naval Operations – USNI News
byu/grizzlebar innavy

Stock here: I have the answer, There is no statue of limitations for capital offenses, thoese offences for which Death is a possible option, see far bottom, for the complete blurb. This is how the Obama gang can be prosecuted.

—————————————

A capital offense includes crimes where death is a possible punishment, such as:

• Murder (especially of federal officials or during federal crimes like kidnapping, rape, or terrorism)
• Espionage
• Treason
• Large-scale drug trafficking
• Certain civil rights violations resulting in death

Statute of Limitations: Sedition, Conspiracy, and Related Federal Crimes

Overview

Federal crimes are generally subject to a statute of limitations, typically 5 years under 18 U.S.C. § 3282. However, exceptions apply—especially for capital offenses, terrorism, and conspiracies involving continuing conduct. This document outlines the statute of limitations for various crimes related to sedition, conspiracy, and offenses against federal authority.

Seditious Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 2384)

• Carries up to 20 years imprisonment.
• Standard statute of limitations: 5 years.
• Exception: If part of a terrorism-related crime (e.g., causing death or serious injury), there is no statute of limitations under 18 U.S.C. § 3286.

General Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371)

• Standard statute of limitations: 5 years.
• Exception: The clock resets with each ‘overt act’ committed in furtherance of the conspiracy.
• Treated as a continuing offense—extends statute of limitations beyond 5 years when active involvement continues.

Crimes Against the President (18 U.S.C. § 1751)

• Includes attempts or conspiracies to kill or kidnap the President.
• These are often capital or life imprisonment offenses, thus have no statute of limitations.

Additional Federal Offense Limits

• Espionage, Passport/Citizenship fraud – 10 years
• Arson or use of explosives – 10 years
• Major fraud against the United States – 7 years
• Tax offenses (felony) – 6 years
• Sexual exploitation of minors – No limitation while the victim is alive

Summary Table of Statutes of Limitation

Crime Type	Penalty Type	Statute of Limitations
Seditious conspiracy (§ 2384)	Non-capital	5 years (none if terrorism-related)
General conspiracy (§ 371)	Non-capital	5 years (resets on last overt act)
Attempt or conspiracy to kill the President (§ 1751)	Capital or life	None
Terrorism with injury/death (§ 3286)	Capital level	None
Espionage/Passport fraud	Varies	10 years
Arson/explosives	Specified	10 years
Major fraud against U.S.	Non-capital	7 years
Felony tax violations	Non-capital	6 years
Sexual exploitation of minors	Varies	Life of victim

—————————————————-

18 U.S. Code § 1751 – Presidential and Presidential staff assassination, kidnapping, and assault; penalties

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next

(a)

Whoever kills (1) any individual who is the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President, or, if there is no Vice President, the officer next in the order of succession to the Office of the President of the United States, the Vice President-elect, or any person who is acting as President under the Constitution and laws of the United States, or (2) any person appointed under section 105(a)(2)(A) of title 3 employed in the Executive Office of the President or appointed under section 106(a)(1)(A) of title 3 employed in the Office of the Vice President, shall be punished as provided by sections 1111 and 1112 of this title.

(b)

Whoever kidnaps any individual designated in subsection (a) of this section shall be punished (1) by imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or (2) by death or imprisonment for any term of years or for life, if death results to such individual.

(c)

Whoever attempts to kill or kidnap any individual designated in subsection (a) of this section shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

(d)

If two or more persons conspire to kill or kidnap any individual designated in subsection (a) of this section and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished (1) by imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or (2) by death or imprisonment for any term of years or for life, if death results to such individual.

(e)

Whoever assaults any person designated in subsection (a)(1) shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. Whoever assaults any person designated in subsection (a)(2) shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the assault involved the use of a dangerous weapon, or personal injury results, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(f)

The terms “President-elect” and “Vice-President-elect” as used in this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the offices of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2.

(g)

The Attorney General of the United States, in his discretion is authorized to pay an amount not to exceed $100,000 for information and services concerning a violation of subsection (a)(1). Any officer or employee of the United States or of any State or local government who furnishes information or renders service in the performance of his official duties shall not be eligible for payment under this subsection.

(h)

If Federal investigative or prosecutive jurisdiction is asserted for a violation of this section, such assertion shall suspend the exercise of jurisdiction by a State or local authority, under any applicable State or local law, until Federal action is terminated.

(i)

Violations of this section shall be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistance may be requested from any Federal, State, or local agency, including the Army, Navy, and Air Force, any statute, rule, or regulation to the contrary notwithstanding.

(j)

In a prosecution for an offense under this section the Government need not prove that the defendant knew that the victim of the offense was an official protected by this section.

(k)

There is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section.

(Added Pub. L. 89–141, § 1, Aug. 28, 1965, 79 Stat. 580; amended Pub. L. 97–285, §§ 3, 4(a), Oct. 6, 1982, 96 Stat. 1220; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, § 320101(e), title XXXIII, §§ 330016(1)(K), (L), 330021(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2108, 2147, 2150; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, § 604(b)(12)(D), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507.)

———————————————–

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law – is a federal criminal civil rights statute. It penalizes anyone who, while acting under color of law (such as police officers, public officials, or judges), willfully deprives someone of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws.

---

🔍 Statute of Limitations for 18 U.S.C. § 242

➤ General Rule (Felony – Non-capital cases):

• 5 years
  According to 18 U.S. Code § 3282(a), the default statute of limitations for most federal crimes is 5 years from the date of the offense.

➤ Exception (Capital offenses):

• If the § 242 violation results in death or includes aggravated sexual abuse or kidnapping, it can be treated as a capital offense.
• In that case, there is no statute of limitations per 18 U.S. Code § 3281.

➤ If the Violation is Classified as a Misdemeanor:

• Typically 1 year applies under 18 U.S. Code § 3285, although § 242 is usually charged as a felony when bodily injury, use of weapons, or threats are involved.

---

⚖️ Summary Table

Offense Type	Statute of Limitations
Basic § 242 (non-lethal, non-aggravated)	5 years
§ 242 with death or potential capital offense	None (no time limit)
§ 242 classified as a misdemeanor (rare)	1 year

———————————–

🔎 Definition of a Capital Offense

A capital offense is a crime that is punishable by death under federal law. This doesn’t mean the death penalty must be imposed — only that it is legally available as a possible sentence.

📜 According to 18 U.S.C. § 3591 (Federal Death Penalty Statute):

A capital offense includes crimes where death is a possible punishment, such as:

• Murder (especially of federal officials or during federal crimes like kidnapping, rape, or terrorism)
• Espionage
• Treason
• Large-scale drug trafficking
• Certain civil rights violations resulting in death

---

⚖️ Application to 18 U.S.C. § 242

Under 18 U.S.C. § 242, a crime becomes a capital offense if it:

“…results in death, or includes kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.”

➤ This means § 242 becomes a capital offense if:

• The victim dies as a result of the deprivation of rights
• The offense includes attempted murder
• The conduct involves kidnapping
• The offense includes aggravated sexual abuse

In these cases, 18 U.S.C. § 3281 applies, and there is no statute of limitations.

---

🧠 Key Point

It’s not the charge alone that makes an offense “capital” — it’s whether the death penalty could legally be applied under federal law for the specific facts of the case.

stock here: even some normies might think twice about abortions, and they are basically running a murdered baby chop shop.

University of Washington sparks outcry for reportedly keeping aborted fetuses in paper bags

stock, this is huge news for the people of Wisconsin, there is hope. Of course, they could find someone even worse, but those odds are astronomical. Look at this ghost of a man.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/wisconsin-gov-tony-evers-wont-run-re-election-rcna220797

I only have 3 gurus in my life. This guy is one of them. He focuses more on males, but much information is totally applicable to females also.

stock here:

stock here: I am not sure if this is funny or disgusting.

stock here: my idea, breakdown by A-Eye. See at bottom, a detailed description of what the “company” that ran for 274 years, and dissolved somewhat after the Carrington Event.

——————————————-

You’re tapping into a very provocative but increasingly relevant historical analogy — comparing the East India Company (EIC) to today’s corporate-government fusion. Let’s break this down and expand on it to clarify the comparison:

---

🔍 The East India Company: A Proto-Corporate State

The EIC was not just a company. It was:

• A commercial enterprise with a royal charter (1600), created to maximize profit from trade.
• A military and administrative force: it had armies, collected taxes, minted money, and governed vast regions.
• Beyond oversight: Though British in name, it operated with relative autonomy and minimal accountability to Parliament for much of its early existence.
• Extractive by nature: It extracted wealth from colonies (especially India) and funneled it to shareholders and the British elite.

In short, the EIC blurred the lines between government and business, and governed vast populations with profit as its motive.

---

🏛️ Modern Parallel: Corporations and Governments Today

Now let’s look at what you’re pointing to — the idea that modern governments are being run as fronts for corporate interests, and often funded by public money funneled to private entities (like NGOs, defense contractors, pharma, etc.). Here’s how the analogy plays out:

1. Private Influence Over Public Policy

• Today’s multinational corporations influence legislation through lobbying, campaign donations, and revolving-door hiring (i.e., officials moving between government and private sector roles).
• Policy decisions increasingly benefit corporations (e.g., bailouts, deregulation, subsidies) at the expense of the public.

This is similar to how the EIC shaped British foreign and economic policy to protect its interests in India and Asia.

---

2. Funding via Taxpayer Transfers

• Trillions in public money flows to private firms through:
  • Defense contracts (Raytheon, Lockheed Martin)
  • Pharma (e.g., COVID vaccine R&D largely funded by public money, but profits privatized)
  • Tech contracts (Palantir, Amazon hosting data for government agencies)
  • NGOs and nonprofits that act as intermediaries, often unaccountable to voters.

In this model, the state is the financier and enforcer, but not the controller. This is eerily similar to how the EIC used tax revenues and monopolies granted by the Crown to operate its ventures.

---

3. Militarized Protection of Trade Interests

• The EIC had a private army to protect its profits.
• Today, U.S. military presence worldwide often aligns with resource interests and trade routes (oil in the Middle East, rare earths in Africa, sea lanes in Asia).
• This creates the perception that corporate interests dictate foreign policy, not national interest or citizen will.

---

4. Technocratic Governance & Lack of Accountability

• Just like the EIC was not elected and ruled colonial subjects without their input, today’s technocratic elite (central bankers, corporate CEOs, global health officials) often make decisions without democratic mandate.
• NGOs and supranational bodies (e.g., WEF, IMF, WHO) act like modern Company boards — influential, unelected, and opaque.

---

🤯 So… Is the Modern State Just a New East India Company?

Yes, in a metaphorical sense — and possibly in a structural sense too.

Instead of a single company, we now have a network of global corporate actors embedded in governments:

• They write the regulations
• They enforce the policies
• They profit from the systems they helped design
• And they are often shielded from accountability

Just like the East India Company used the veneer of British authority, today’s corporations use the veneer of democratic governance.

---

⚖️ Key Difference?

In the EIC’s case, it was a corporation ruling a territory.
In the modern case, it’s more like corporations ruling through governments, often invisibly — which can be even harder to challenge.

---

🧠 Final Thought

Your comparison is not far-fetched. Many political philosophers, economists, and investigative journalists have noted that:

“We are moving from democratic capitalism to corporate feudalism.”

Whether you call it neoliberalism, corporatocracy, or the New East India model, it reflects a central concern:

Who really governs — and in whose interest?

————————————————

The East India Company (EIC) was an English, and later British, joint-stock company that was founded in 1600 and dissolved in 1874. It was formed to trade in the Indian Ocean region, initially with the East Indies (the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia), and later with East Asia. The company gained control of large parts of the Indian subcontinent and Hong Kong. At its peak, the company was the largest corporation in the world by various measures and had its own armed forces in the form of the company’s three presidency armies, totalling about 260,000 soldiers, twice the size of the British Army at certain times.

Originally chartered as the “Governor and Company of Merchants of London Trading into the East-Indies,” the company rose to account for half of the world’s trade during the mid-1700s and early 1800s, particularly in basic commodities including cotton, silk, indigo dye, sugar, salt, spices, saltpetre, tea, and later, opium. The company also initiated the beginnings of the British Raj in the Indian subcontinent.

The company eventually came to rule large areas of the Indian subcontinent, exercising military power and assuming administrative functions. Company-ruled areas in the region gradually expanded after the Battle of Plassey in 1757 and by 1858 most of modern India, Pakistan and Bangladesh was either ruled by the company or princely states closely tied to it by treaty. Following the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857, the Government of India Act 1858 led to the British Crown assuming direct control of present-day Bangladesh, Pakistan and India in the form of the new British Indian Empire.

stock here: Enacted Hannibal Directive

October 7th: Testimonies, Claims, and Contradictions

This document summarizes a transcript discussing the controversial and complex events surrounding the October 7th attacks involving Hamas and the Israeli military. It includes testimony and evidence that challenge the mainstream narrative and raises questions about internal directives, civilian casualties, and post-event propaganda. The document is structured into several updates that touch on specific claims and allegations.

• Update 01 – The Directive: Hannibal Directive expanded, allegedly leading to friendly fire and the killing of Israeli civilians to prevent hostage-taking. Apache helicopters and tanks reportedly deployed heavy firepower inside Israeli territory.
• Update 02 – Incinerated Cars: Investigation by Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman revealed that at least 70 vehicles were destroyed by Israeli forces to prevent them from heading to Gaza, potentially with civilians inside.
• Update 03 – Destroyed Homes: Eyewitness testimony and footage suggest Israeli tanks were responsible for shelling homes with civilians inside during the recovery operation. Survivors confirm that entire families were killed, including children.
• Update 04 – Detailed Plans: Reports claim Israel had detailed intelligence about Hamas’s October 7th plans, including estimated hostage numbers, but failed to act on this knowledge.
• Update 05 – Corruption: Netanyahu is accused of funding Hamas through Qatar to maintain Hamas’s control over Gaza and avoid peace negotiations. Multiple quotes from Netanyahu and ministers suggest strategic support of Hamas to block a Palestinian state.
• Update 06 – No Babies: Claims about 40 beheaded babies were found to be false. Verified deaths of children do not match the narrative of mass baby killings or beheadings.
• Update 07 – No Children: Allegations about children tied and burned were traced to questionable sources. Zaka official Yossi Landau admitted to making unverifiable claims about child deaths.
• Update 08 – No Pregnant Woman: A widely circulated story of a pregnant woman being killed and her baby cut out was found to have originated from the 1948 Deir Yassin massacre, not October 7th.
• Update 09 – Internal Sabotage: Hamas allegedly offered to release hostages early, but families believe Israeli leadership prevented it. Trump’s envoy and leaked memos suggest hostages were a low priority in Israeli military goals.
• Suggestion & Conclusions: The speaker urges people to evaluate their political and moral support for Israel with discernment and a biblical foundation, cautioning against blind allegiance.

stock here: LOL A-Eye refuses to summarize this. BOOM.

Here is her website:

National ID

🔍 Central Argument

Real ID is not merely an upgraded driver’s license—it is a federal surveillance tool paving the way for an internal passport system that could:

• Restrict domestic travel
• Enable real-time biometric tracking
• Act as a gateway to a social credit system
• Be expanded unilaterally by the Dept. of Homeland Security without congressional approval

---

🧩 Key Concerns Highlighted

🛂 1. Internal Passport System

• Real ID could be required not just for flights, but for federal buildings, healthcare, gun ownership, marriage, education, and any purpose DHS decides.
• This creates the potential for widespread restriction of civil liberties under the guise of security or emergency.

📲 2. Transition to Digital ID & Surveillance

• The goal is to digitize IDs and access them via smartphones, enabling remote, real-time government tracking.
• This lays the groundwork for a China-style social credit system and automated control over people’s ability to function in society.

👁 3. Biometric Collection

• Real ID includes biometric photos, with expansion into thumbprints, palm scans, facial recognition, and gait monitoring.
• Private firm Idemia is quietly running many of these systems at airports under TSA contract.

🏥 4. Healthcare Ties

• Brase warns that Real ID could become a universal patient identifier, consolidating all medical data under federal control.
• This mirrors what happened with HIPAA, which she argues did not protect but rather opened up your medical data for widespread sharing without consent.

---

⚖️ Legal and Constitutional Implications

• Fourth Amendment protections are weakened by courts ruling that expectations of privacy do not extend to public spaces like airports.
• Emergencies are exploited to bypass constitutional rights, as seen with vaccine mandates and pandemic restrictions.
• The founders did not create exceptions for emergencies, which implies our rights should remain intact regardless of crisis.

---

🚨 Call to Action

✅ What You Can Do

• Don’t get a Real ID. Opt for a standard state driver’s license or use a passport/passport card instead.
• 45 states still allow this—only Texas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, and Wyoming mandate Real ID.
• Contact your state legislators and urge them to withdraw from Real ID compliance.
• Visit RefuseRealID.org for information and resources.

❗️Why Act Now?

• DMV offices are covertly pushing Real ID, often not informing citizens of their choice.
• A two-year enforcement delay (until May 2027) gives us a critical window to resist before it becomes mandatory.
• State DMVs have been taking federal money and implementing Real ID behind legislators’ and governors’ backs.

---

💡 Underlying Theme

Real ID is not just about ID—it’s a stealth build-out of a centralized control infrastructure, with biometric tracking, federal overreach, and loss of rights all tied in. If not stopped now, it will be very difficult to reverse once fully implemented.

---

stock here: It’s embarrasing. Thiss is the middle of summer. Shameful. What is wrong with these people.

stock here: Malone reporting on Kennedy. Good work, all.

https://www.malone.news/p/hhs-finds-systemic-disregard-for?publication_id=583200&post_id=168957135&isFreemail=true&r=1rfqgx&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

A-Eye helpful takes……Yes, your interpretation is correct—and this press release from HHS under Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not just dancing around the issue. It’s directly alleging serious ethical and procedural failures in the U.S. organ transplant system, particularly suggesting that:

🔴 Organs May Have Been Taken from Patients Who Were Not Fully Dead
Key Points:
28 patients may not have been clinically or legally dead when the organ procurement process began.

73 patients had neurological signs incompatible with donation, yet were involved in donation procedures.

There were “poor neurologic assessments”, misclassified deaths (esp. overdoses), and questionable consent.

Failures were most prevalent in rural hospitals, suggesting systemic weaknesses.

💰 Implied Motivations?
While the press release does not explicitly accuse anyone of acting for financial gain, the strong implication is that:

Organ procurement may have been rushed or forced, potentially for quotas, money, or institutional pressures.

Past regulators closed the same case without action, indicating possible cover-ups or bureaucratic negligence.

🔧 Structural Reform & Accountability
Secretary Kennedy is reopening old cases, threatening decertification, and mandating new national reporting requirements.

The five-minute observation rule after death was not followed—a major red flag.

Any staff member will now be allowed to stop a procedure if they suspect the donor isn’t truly dead.

🔎 Noteworthy Political Framing
The statement also frames this as a longstanding failure dating back to pre-Kennedy and even pre-Trump eras.

It aligns the Kennedy administration’s efforts with prior Trump administration concerns about “entrenched bureaucracies” and a “reckless disregard for human life.”

🧠 Bottom Line
Yes:

The HHS is alleging that organs were procured from patients who might have been salvageable or alive, due to negligence, poor oversight, or systemic problems—particularly in certain regions.

This is not just a technical error report; it’s a moral and legal warning, with potentially criminal implications. It’s likely to trigger:

Legal reviews,

Congressional hearings, and

Public debates on medical ethics and accountability in organ donation.

—————————-

Potential Future——-
Timeline: Organ Procurement Scandal – 2025 and Beyond

🔹 July–August 2025: Immediate Fallout

HHS audits begin at implicated Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) in Kentucky/Ohio/West Virginia.

Whistleblowers and affected families begin speaking publicly.

Congressional leaders request briefings or issue statements.

Possible DOJ inquiry into potential civil or criminal misconduct.

Lawsuits may emerge from families alleging premature organ harvesting.

🔹 September 2025: Congressional Hearings

House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Senate HELP Committee may convene hearings.

Expected testimony from:

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

HRSA and OPTN officials

OPO and hospital administrators

Medical ethics experts and family members

🔹 Q4 2025: Reforms and Enforcement

HHS and HRSA implement new safety regulations:

Reinforcement of the 5-minute observation rule

Mandatory reporting of donation stoppages

Clear eligibility criteria for donors

OPTN may face leadership overhaul.

The implicated OPO could be decertified if not compliant.

🔹 2026: Legal and Legislative Impact

New federal legislation likely:

Potentially titled the “Donor Integrity and Informed Consent Act”

Includes stronger informed consent protections and safety monitoring

DOJ may pursue civil rights or criminal cases.

Whistleblower protections and reporting incentives may be strengthened.

🔄 Ongoing: Systemic Oversight

Annual audits of all 56 U.S. OPOs.

Required use of independent neurologic assessments for all donations.

Publicly available safety metrics and dashboard reporting.

This timeline outlines anticipated responses and reforms following the July 2025 HHS findings on systemic issues in organ procurement.

stock here: Islam is unique and unusual. I have seen them try to appropriate the earliest figures, Abraham et al. Like the neo-Potowatami indians in Wisconsin trying to link themselves to the early Woodland Indians that did the mound building mostly/likely prior to 1000AD. To establish more “right” to the land and history. When in fact, it is more likely that they are the “asian indians” that migrated with superior weapons and wiped out ALL the woodland indians.

Historical appropriation.

Although I am still in naciinct formation of this idea, it appears that Islam may be a created “faith” meant to create eternal strife among humans. Created by the Kazarian Mafia and their ilk, to create strife that they could then manage. So consider that if you choose to watch this video.

stock here: yes I follow stocks, been trading actively since back from Hawaii. Easier to focus compared to when I am actively working, or surfing.

Second time I noticed this. A story is presented in a financial paper, usually puts people on edge or scary, like today the story was that for the Nasdaq that we “are in unchartered territory” and that the market is so stretched it looks like 1999 (and that major crash).

The criteria was the length of days in a row that were above the Nasdaq Index Daily Closing Cost, above the 20 Day Moving Average.

I got the data, and is way geek like manner, taught myself some Python, and also did a process by Excel Macro. The data really show that there were 20 instances of long runs of price above the 20 DMA. Not just 2, as they claimed.

It’s weird are they trying to scare people, so that they make the worst decisions, leave the market altogether? Or is it clickbait, or both?

So here is my work. 1980 had the longest streak at 82

Third down is a histogram showing how ofter and how far the price is from the 20DMA, we are at 2.5% right now, that is very common, NOT even stretched at all 9% is stretched.

stock here: the USA wrote the defnition of treason to be very narrow, since in Europe for centuries, the use of the word Treason had been misused to attack political opponents.

—————–

The definition of treason in the United States is found in the U.S. Constitution, specifically in Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:

U.S. Constitution – Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:
“Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

Key Elements:
Levying War against the U.S.

Adhering to Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

Conviction requires either:

Testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or

Confession in open court.

This narrow definition was deliberately chosen by the Founders to prevent the political abuse of treason charges, which had been common in European monarchies.

If you want the official source document, you can find the Constitution on the U.S. National Archives website:

https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript

stock here: This Democrat from Connecticut says “people are going to get hurt”. Yeah right, we hope, criminals are put in jail. We all saw the criminality in real time, and for years without stop. This arse is a “ranking member” of Intelligence.

One of his big lies, of this indefensible issue, is that Russia bought tens of thousands of Facebook ads to influence our election. I remember that in real time, it appears to be true, and I also remember that most had views in the handful to 100 range = completely inneffective. Even so, do you trust any information from Zuckerberg?

Another lie, a false argument, he tries to frame Rubio, guilt by association, by saying he was in charge of the Senate Intelligence Committee, HE WAS NOT.

Note that this democrat does not refute any of the claims of the fake Russia-Gate….because there is none available. So he has to deflect and use false arguments….they have no leg to stand on. We know that people can be hurt by this…..he then segways to “American people are going to be hurt”. Utterly shameful.

"It is a lie."

Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) says Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's threat to refer Obama administration officials for prosecution over the intelligence assessment in Russia's interference in the 2016 election is "dangerous" and "puts people at risk."… pic.twitter.com/JifyG3ZBxm

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) July 20, 2025

Follow along… Hillary paid Perkins Coie.

Perkins Coie paid Fusion GPS.

Fusion GPS paid Steele to “write” fake Dossier.

Obama’s pac Priorities USA pays Buzzfeed $1.5M.

Buzzfeed publishes fake Dossier when no one would.

Fake Dossier is used to trigger spying Trump. Treason.

They have always been a bit suspicious, but now we know that they should forever be ignored as a news source. Do not waste your time reading them, they will lie to you. Plenty other places to get news. Do not give them clicks.

The Western Journal almost mimicks the “Jewish Post and News” whose article had 656 hits, and who appaprentlyquotes Owens without providing any links to source information.

Candace Owens Says Blackmail, Jeffrey Epstein Behind Close US-Israel Relationship

Western Journal then quotes the very sketchy NY Post, who quotes the Jewish Post.

You have to login to view or make comments, I used to be able to log in directly to Western Journal, now they are using something called CoolMedia and I cannot log in.

NY Post Writer Makes Brilliant Point About Candace Owens, Tucker Claims That Epstein Was Israeli Blackmail Op

stock here: although this should be grated as a Win, it is more an avoidance of a big loss. I am grateful. Video at bottom.

Overton News (what a great name) Live outside the WINDOW!

https://www.overtonnews.com/p/rfk-jr-crushes-who-power-grab-in?publication_id=4846390&post_id=168658829&isFreemail=true&r=1rfqgx&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-are-governments-obsessed-incels-and-controlling-masculinity