stock here: Is this?
- A furtherance of division and infighting, and the upcoming “civil war” as “documented” by A-Eye and a totally corrupt media.
- A necessary reality point, in which we all know that both parties have nothing to do with American’s well being, and we need to just stop the corruption and then maybe people’s moral values (if they can come back) will start working again, and for the American people.
- Read all about it News, seems like a good site. It shall go into my daily review.
- —————————-
General Michael Flynn says he’s knows why we’re not getting accountability for the Minnesota daycare fraud
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) January 6, 2026
He’s looked into Speaker Mike Johnson and he’s getting daycare and healthcare clinic money funneled through PACs
Taxpayers are being robbed blind
“I want Speaker Johnson… pic.twitter.com/DMLMM9OB4I
———————————-
When people like Michael Flynn talk about money flowing from PACs to daycares or clinics, they aren’t usually talking about a “donation.” They are describing what they believe is a kickback or “pay-to-play” loop.
Here is a breakdown of why this would happen in “reverse” and how that type of scheme generally works:
1. The “Revolving Door” of Taxpayer Money
The allegation isn’t that a PAC is being “generous” to a daycare. Instead, it posits a cycle of government funding. The logic usually follows this path:
- Step 1: A politician (like a Speaker) helps secure large government grants or subsidies for specific industries (like childcare or healthcare).
- Step 2: Those businesses receive millions in taxpayer funds.
- Step 3: To ensure the money keeps flowing, those businesses (or the consultants who run them) “kick back” a portion of that profit into the politician’s PAC.
- Step 4: The PAC then pays “consulting fees” or “vendor fees” back to companies associated with those same daycare or healthcare networks.
In this scenario, the daycare is used as a front or a “washing machine” to turn taxpayer grants into political or personal wealth.
2. Why would a PAC send money to a Clinic/Daycare?
If a PAC is sending money to a daycare or clinic, it’s usually filed under “Vendor Services” or “Community Outreach.” This can be a red flag for a few reasons:
- Inflated Invoices: A PAC might pay a “healthcare clinic” $100,000 for “voter wellness outreach” when no such work was actually done. This is a way to move PAC money out of the public eye and into a private business.
- Staffing & “Ghost Employees”: Sometimes, political operatives are put on the payroll of these private clinics or daycares while actually working on a campaign. The PAC pays the clinic, and the clinic pays the operative.
- Influence Peddling: If a politician has a family member or a close ally who owns or consults for these clinics, the PAC payments are essentially a way to enrich that individual legally (or semi-legally) using donor money.
3. The “Minnesota Daycare Fraud” Context
The reference to “Minnesota daycare fraud” likely refers to the high-profile Feeding Our Future scandal and similar cases where hundreds of millions in federal funds intended for meals and childcare were allegedly stolen through shell companies.
- Flynn’s allegation suggests that the reason there is no “accountability” for that fraud is that the money has been “funneled” into the political system itself.
- If the people stealing the money are also major donors to the PACs of the people in charge of oversight, the oversight never happens.
4. Why this is “Inside Out” Fraud
You mentioned that daycare-to-PAC is “obvious” fraud (bribery). The reverse (PAC-to-daycare) is often money laundering or embezzlement.
- The Goal: It’s about getting money out of a regulated campaign account and into a private, less-scrutinized business where it can be used for personal expenses or untraceable influence.
Summary of the Allegation
Flynn is effectively accusing the Speaker of participating in a protection racket. He’s claiming that by moving money between PACs and these private entities, the political establishment is “interlocking” their financial interests with the very industries they are supposed to be auditing.