Just recently on “The View” a shameful venue. She looks “pretty OK” far better than the stage show on Kavanaugh.
Even on the “Tea Party” site, their article about her lying is now a 404.
The article writer is so tone deaf that they show the “event” photo were she looked frail, in glasses, weird hair.
She said her good friend was there and knew about the assault but her friend denied it. She said she had a fear of flying and her ex-boyfriend revealed that she flew in small planes and commercial airlines. And so many other lies were apparent. She realized afterwards that when you go on national tv that millions of viewers will notice hundreds of details that don’t add up and especially the body language.
I wrote this Sept 2018 before my website was censored and destroyed.
Repost:
Balsey-Fraud’s ridiculous behavior was so much like Strzok’s. While he was bizarrely odd, immature and goofy she engages in baby talk and projects a level of fragility that makes her appear unable to cross the street without holding the hand of an “adult”. Her performance was preposterous. Let’s see a video of her teaching or at a conference or anywhere. I’m a licensed clinician and that was a “school play” as George Webb would say.
After 36 Years, she threw herself under the bus for “the cause”.
—————————- Left= Leaks, Lies, Intentional Falsehoods
Party was held; she forgot who she was with or how she got home; she was drinking and said nothing to anyone. 1983, through to 2002 She said nothing. July 25, 2003: President George W. Bush nominated Kavanaugh to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit…
She said nothing. 2004, 2005… She said nothing. May 11, 2006: The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary recommended confirmation. Kavanaugh subsequently confirmed by the United States Senate… She said nothing. June 1, 2006: Kavanaugh sworn in by Justice Anthony Kennedy… She said nothing.
2007, through to 2011… She said nothing. 2012… She remembered ‘something’ happened in 1982, yet doesn’t name Kavanaugh, still said nothing to authorities. 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 – She becomes an anti-trump activist 2018 – Now 36 years later, with Kavanaugh’s SCOTUS confirmation looming, she pens an anonymous letter with grave accusations against Kavanaugh regarding foggy circumstance that occurred while they were both minors, then reveals herself and DEMANDS an FBI investigation before testifying to her incredible allegations? Who does she think she is?…….and then there’s this picture of her and George Soros…hmmm….Can anyone else see what’s REALLY going on here? and now the Corrupt FBI is “Investigating” this? LOL!!!!
So, Her father is CIA; she oversees CIA mind control (MK- Ultra) program at Stanford; she is a huge Clinton supporter; her brother was/is connected with Fusion GPS; the Balsey-Fraud family works with the Strzok family selling night vision goggles in middle East- and all that information is out there now- why is anyone even continuing with this farce?
William Casey (Reagans CIA director. Yes, the one who said “when everything the American People Believe is a lie, our task will be complete”) publicly thanked her Father for contributions to the CIA psychological warfare research.
————————————————————-
1. I don’t know Christine Blasey-Ford, but I do know what democrat political operations look like when I see them.
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
2. I also know what Democrat “handlers” do when they are working their political instructions. In this case the visible handlers are: Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich.
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
3. The reason Ms. Ford’s airline travel was an issue, was because Katz and Bromwich constructed that *false narrative* as a delay tactic.
65 replies 1,563 retweets 5,237 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
4. Likely the socially awkward Ms. Ford was a useful tool by Katz Inc. on behalf of the Democrats and their media allies. This is how they roll.
42 replies 1,027 retweets 3,949 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
5. Hence Ms. Ford has no idea who is the financier behind the entire operation; and all of her subsequent expenses. The script was written around her, with an intended purpose. Likely the first narrative was reliant on never actually appearing before congress.
59 replies 1,214 retweets 4,220 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
6. The airport hotel lie-detector narrative, part of the constructed evidence through Katz inc. A familiar testing resource, only two questions, a carefully written script to follow etc. Purchased via legal counsel (Katz Inc.)
43 replies 1,071 retweets 3,787 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2
7. As the loose narrative became more evident it was going to end with a congressional appearance, Katz needed more specific support from a Capitol Hill legal insider. Enter Bromwich’s contracted assistance.
8. Loose origination details lead to conflicts. During narrative engineering the most important part of creating falsehood is to avoid specificity.
13 replies 908 retweets 3,234 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
9. Specific claims can be hazards because if they are refuted, the gig is up. So everything needs to be vague, ambiguous and easier to shape.
16 replies 1,024 retweets 3,560 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
10. The narrative engineers cannot specify the *house* where the event took place, because that would lead to specific ownership trouble. If the owner of the residence refutes the false claim, the lie cannot advance. Hence, the “where” must be generally ambiguous.
21 replies 1,359 retweets 4,097 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
11. The “when” can also be a problem. It would suck to give a specific “WHEN” only to find out the accused wasn’t in town, or was elsewhere. Hence any specific “when” must be avoided to retain the false assertion.
30 replies 1,205 retweets 3,859 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
12. As noted, the “who” in this narrative *had to* be a part of the story. But as with this story under scrutiny those four “who’s” actually refuted the accusation and aligned with the accused. Thus the problem with specific “who’s”.
10 replies 909 retweets 3,277 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
13. The use of a validating “counselor” or “therapist” is a common part of a false narrative. The reason is HIPPA protection. Regardless of what the accuser claims, the Dr. is bound to silence unless released.
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
TheLastRefuge Retweeted Paul Sperry
14. Now we see more of the origination details falling apart.
TheLastRefuge added,
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_
BREAKING: Palo Alto bldg permit records raise questions about Ford’s testimony she completed an “extensive remodel” of home in 2012 & that this was seminal event that led her down path to coming out against Kavanaugh b/c she needed to add an escape door. Permit was issued in 2008
24 replies 1,414 retweets 3,669 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
15. Keep pulling these threads, and there’s likely to be many more aspects of the false narrative that will fall apart. [fear of flying, document origination and process issues]
14 replies 858 retweets 3,038 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
16. One can easily imagine a person being exploited, who was promised their need to testify would likely be negligible, beginning to freak out as it appeared testimony was going to be required. Imagine the stress.
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
17. Which would explain the emails to the committee backing out…. trying to find an exit…. not realizing it was going to go THIS FAR. I would doubt strongly the “hacked work email” is even remotely accurate. Occam’s Razor = Panic.
17 replies 835 retweets 2,989 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
18. Under questioning, the Ms. Ford doesn’t even know the committee volunteered to go to her, because the *handlers* (Katz Inc, then Bromwich) controlled everything. She was originally clueless to the airline travel excuse which needed to be constructed rapidly.
43 replies 1,150 retweets 3,385 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
19. The handlers can’t change history, the frequency of Ms. Ford’s airline travel negated the original excuse; and needed to be shaped. Thus she needed to support the excuse in testimony, yet historic reality refutes it.
15 replies 899 retweets 2,969 likes
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
20. This is how modern Democrats roll. Fabrication and the false framework of accusation is their skillset. The lie only needs to hold up long enough to get them to the objective. [ex. Romey’s taxes and Harry Reid]
TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2 Sep 27
21. The end justifies the means; any means. Nothing is out of bounds. This is how the modern political left operate now. Leaks, lies and intentional falsehoods. This is what Lindsey Graham was angry about during the Kavanaugh hearing. They don’t care. /END