Someone—maybe John Roberts—should explain to KBJ what writing an “opinion” entails.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) July 8, 2025
One of many things KBJ clearly doesn’t understand—or chooses not to.
This is so cringe: pic.twitter.com/Pwicwmfqqr
stock here: i had to try 5 times to get the embed code….but check the comments, they are over whelmingly negative. Amazing they couldn’t even a muster a troll to say something supportive of her.
Summary of comments here:
🔎 Key Themes in the Comments:
🧠 Criticism of Legal Reasoning
Many commenters claim KBJ’s dissent or opinions are not grounded in legal logic but in emotion or personal belief (e.g., “based on her feelings,” “like a diary entry”).
Several say her arguments lack coherence or legal rigor and refer to her writing as “entry-level” or “nonsense.”
🎭 Perception of Performative or Theatrical Behavior
Accusations of grandstanding or dramatics during oral arguments: “goes on and on,” “interrupts others,” “spazzed out theater performance.”
Some mock her vocal tone or delivery as childish or unserious.
🏛 Objections to Identity-Based Appointment
Multiple comments refer to her as a “DEI appointment,” meaning her selection was based on diversity, equity, and inclusion rather than merit.
One user calls her “the DEI experiment,” another references “affirmative action,” and several say Biden appointed her because of her identity.
Some express disbelief that she graduated from Harvard Law.
🧾 Doubt of Authenticity or Qualification
Comments question whether she writes her own opinions or uses AI/staff exclusively.
One sarcastically references a “Temu Law Degree.”
Some suggest she lacks basic constitutional knowledge (e.g., “We are a republic, not a democracy”).
🖊 Autopen Allegation
At least two commenters claim or speculate that KBJ was appointed using an autopen signature, suggesting the process was illegitimate or rushed.
😡 Mockery and Personal Insults
Many comments cross into personal attacks:
Mocking her intelligence (“96 IQ”).
Mocking her speech level (“5th grade level”).
Using demeaning language (e.g., “stupid cow,” “sitcom theater kid”).
🧭 General Tone and Bias
This collection of comments is overwhelmingly negative, mocking, and deeply skeptical of KBJ’s qualifications, independence, and legitimacy as a justice. Most seem to originate from a right-leaning or anti-DEI perspective, with emotional language and identity-driven critique rather than detailed legal counterarguments.