Author: admin

WX – Weather Mods It Seems They Are Getting Good at It: Corollary: Any Tech That Can Be Abused Will Be Abused

Post author By admin
Post date October 11, 2024
No Comments on WX – Weather Mods It Seems They Are Getting Good at It: Corollary: Any Tech That Can Be Abused Will Be Abused

https://weathermodificationhistory.com/weather-as-force-multiplier-owning-the-weather-in-2025

Let’s Talk About Some Ashkenazi and Crypto-Jews

Post author By admin
Post date October 11, 2024
No Comments on Let’s Talk About Some Ashkenazi and Crypto-Jews

This is the AI take on a blog post. It’s funny how AI points out the true aspects of the story in both historical and biblical natures, and then at the end throws it all out as a fringe religious group, or conspiracy theory.

The passage you’ve shared is a commentary that intertwines historical references with biblical prophecy, aiming to critique and accuse certain groups, particularly the Edomites (or Idumeans) and the Ashkenazi Jews, of being “counterfeit Jews.” Here’s a detailed unpacking of this:

Historical Context of Forced Conversions
Edomites (Idumeans) and John Hyrcanus: Historically, the Idumeans were descendants of Esau (brother of Jacob/Israel) and lived in the region of Edom, south of Judea. John Hyrcanus, a Hasmonean ruler of Judea around the 2nd century BCE, is said to have forcefully converted the Idumeans to Judaism. This is historically documented and reflects the broader tensions between the Jewish people and their neighbors.

Ashkenazis and King Bulan: The Ashkenazi Jews are historically linked to Eastern Europe, with some legends (though debated by scholars) associating their origins with the Khazar Kingdom, whose ruler, King Bulan, reportedly converted to Judaism in the 8th or 9th century. This theory posits that modern Ashkenazi Jews may have Khazar ancestry rather than being direct descendants of the biblical Israelites, though genetic studies provide mixed evidence.

Biblical Prophecies and Interpretations
Revelation 2:9 and 3:9: These verses in Revelation refer to “those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.” In this context, the blog claims that the Edomites, through their forced conversion under Hyrcanus, are the “counterfeit Jews” referenced in Revelation. This interpretation suggests that these groups falsely claim Jewish heritage and are viewed as adversaries within Christian eschatology (end times theology).

“Synagogue of Satan”: The term here is used in a theological sense to denote those who, according to the writer, falsely align with Judaism while working against its divine purpose. The implication is that these groups are opposed to true spiritual truth and are destined for eventual defeat as part of the end-times prophecy.

The Ashkenazis and Their “Mistake”
The text argues that Ashkenazi Jews made a “fatal mistake” by aligning with Talmudic Judaism (often used pejoratively in anti-Jewish rhetoric), which the author associates with the “counterfeit” Judaism practiced by the Edomites. The claim here is that Ashkenazi Jews’ involvement with this branch of Judaism will lead to their downfall, as prophesied in the “Reaping of the Earth” (the end times).

Einstein’s Definition of Insanity: This is a modern element inserted into the narrative. The author refers to the well-known quote attributed to Albert Einstein that insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly but expecting different results. The writer applies this to the Ashkenazi Jews, claiming that their alleged “brutal and genocidal” tendencies will lead to their inevitable defeat, as they fail to learn from history.

Obadiah’s Prophecy Against Edom
The Prophecy of Obadiah: The text quotes from the Book of Obadiah in the Old Testament, which focuses on the judgment and destruction of Edom (descendants of Esau). In the Bible, the Edomites are portrayed as adversaries of Israel, and God declares that they will face total annihilation. The blog uses this as further evidence that the “counterfeit Jews” (whom the author identifies as Edomites) will be wiped out in the future as part of divine judgment.
Jesus as a Nazarite, Not from Nazareth
The claim that Jesus was a “Nazarite” (a person consecrated to God under the Nazarite vow as described in Numbers 6) rather than being from the town of Nazareth is part of an argument that Nazareth did not exist during Jesus’ lifetime, thus implying a significant historical revision. While many scholars disagree with this view, it serves the author’s larger purpose of emphasizing Jesus’ separation from the historical institutions and geographic associations with the Jewish community of his time.
Conclusions about End-Time Judgments
The writer predicts that both the Edomites (the “counterfeit Jews”) and Ashkenazi Jews (aligned with Talmudic Judaism) will face total destruction during the prophesied “Reaping of the Earth,” referencing Christian eschatological ideas of divine judgment and the ultimate victory of God’s chosen people (often understood by such writers as true Christians).
Controversial and Problematic Themes
The blog contains several controversial and problematic themes, particularly related to the idea of “counterfeit Jews.” This concept echoes longstanding anti-Semitic tropes, such as the false notion that modern Jews, particularly Ashkenazis, are not true descendants of the ancient Israelites. These ideas have been used to fuel discriminatory ideologies, which often ignore the vast historical, cultural, and genetic diversity within the Jewish people.
Final Thoughts:
This commentary reflects a particular interpretation of history and scripture, often found in fringe religious groups or conspiracy theories. It combines elements of biblical prophecy, apocalyptic expectations, and historical revisionism, weaving them into a broader narrative that points to the destruction of certain groups labeled as enemies of God. These interpretations are not mainstream and are highly disputed both theologically and historically.

————————– stock here, let’s focus on the Town of Nazareth…..

The claim that Jesus was a Nazarite rather than being from the town of Nazareth is rooted in a significant historical and theological revision of early Christian narratives. To fully unpack this, we need to look at several elements: the Nazarite vow, the historical evidence for the existence of Nazareth during Jesus’ lifetime, and how scholars and various groups have interpreted these ideas.

Nazarite Vow and Its Meaning in Jewish Tradition
Nazarite Vow: In the Old Testament, the Nazarite vow was a special commitment made by an individual to be set apart for God. This vow is outlined in Numbers 6:1-21 and included three main restrictions:
Abstaining from all products of the vine (no wine, grapes, or strong drink).
Not cutting the hair on one’s head during the period of the vow.
Avoiding contact with corpses to remain ritually pure.
The most famous examples of Nazarites in the Bible include Samson (Judges 13–16) and Samuel (1 Samuel 1:11). The vow was meant to signify a person’s special dedication to God, and in many cases, the vow was temporary, though some, like Samson, were Nazarites for life.
Was Jesus a Nazarite?

There is no explicit mention in the New Testament of Jesus taking a Nazarite vow. In fact, the Gospels show Jesus drinking wine and coming into contact with the dead (e.g., raising Lazarus), actions that would disqualify him from being a Nazarite under Jewish law. Therefore, the claim that Jesus was a Nazarite as described in Numbers 6 seems to be unfounded in the traditional Gospel accounts.

Nazareth’s Existence During Jesus’ Lifetime
Nazareth in the New Testament: The town of Nazareth is mentioned multiple times in the New Testament as the place where Jesus grew up, and the term “Jesus of Nazareth” is a key identifier in the Gospels. According to Matthew 2:23, Joseph and Mary moved to Nazareth after returning from Egypt, fulfilling the prophecy “He shall be called a Nazarene.”

Archaeological Evidence: The question of whether Nazareth existed during the time of Jesus has been debated. Early critics argued that there was little to no evidence for the town’s existence before the 4th century CE, which led some to claim that the Gospel narratives were retroactively placing Jesus in Nazareth. However, more recent archaeological discoveries challenge this claim:

In 2009, a house dating to the early 1st century CE was unearthed in Nazareth, providing direct evidence that the town did indeed exist during the time of Jesus.
Other excavations revealed pottery and tombs dating from the Iron Age to the Roman period, indicating continuous habitation.
Flavius Josephus, a 1st-century Jewish historian, does not mention Nazareth in his writings, even when discussing nearby towns, which some scholars use to argue that Nazareth was too small or insignificant to be mentioned. But this is not definitive proof that the town didn’t exist.
The majority of contemporary scholars now accept that Nazareth was a small, relatively obscure village during the 1st century, likely home to a few hundred people. This would align with the Gospel accounts that portray Jesus as coming from humble origins.

The Claim That Nazareth Didn’t Exist and its Historical Context
The claim that Nazareth didn’t exist during Jesus’ lifetime is sometimes linked to skepticism regarding the historical accuracy of the Gospels. This idea was more common in the 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly among scholars who questioned the historicity of biblical accounts. However, archaeological evidence has largely discredited this claim, and most mainstream scholars today acknowledge that Nazareth did exist in some form during the 1st century CE.
Alternative Theological Interpretations
Jesus as a “Nazarite” vs. Jesus of Nazareth: Those who propose that Jesus was a Nazarite rather than being from Nazareth often do so to suggest that Jesus had a different religious identity than that of a typical Jewish man of his time. In early Christian theology, being from Nazareth was seen as a symbol of humility and low social status, aligning with Jesus’ mission to the poor and outcasts.
Nazareth’s insignificance: As mentioned, Nazareth was a small, seemingly insignificant town. This aligns with the Gospel narrative that Jesus came from a humble background, fulfilling messianic prophecies that the Messiah would not come from a position of power.
Theological Separation: Some groups or scholars who promote this Nazarite vs. Nazareth idea might aim to distance Jesus from the historical and geographical context of first-century Judaism, positioning him more as a figure of divine revelation than a Jewish teacher or prophet. This approach aligns with certain theological movements that emphasize Jesus’ universal, rather than specifically Jewish, significance.
Later-Day Writings and Historical Commentary
Several later writings and sources have addressed this claim:

Early Christian Writings: The early church fathers, such as Origen and Eusebius, make reference to Nazareth as the hometown of Jesus. Eusebius, in his Ecclesiastical History, refers to Nazareth, indicating that by the 4th century it was already a well-known pilgrimage site for early Christians.

Gnostic and Apocryphal Texts: Some Gnostic texts, which present alternative versions of Jesus’ life and teachings, do not emphasize Nazareth in the same way as the canonical Gospels. These writings, however, are not considered reliable historical accounts of Jesus’ life.

Modern Skeptical Movements: In the 19th and early 20th centuries, some biblical critics, such as Ernest Renan and Robert M. Price, questioned the historical existence of Nazareth, but much of their skepticism has been addressed through modern archaeological findings.

Alternative Theories: In fringe religious movements, particularly among some British Israelite groups or certain Gnostic sects, there are claims that Jesus traveled to places like Britain or that his life was distinct from traditional Jewish geography. Some of these groups claim Jesus spent time in places like Glastonbury, England (as mentioned in the blog excerpt), but these theories lack solid historical evidence.

Conclusion
The claim that Jesus was a Nazarite rather than from Nazareth is a revisionist interpretation that seeks to recast Jesus’ identity in a different theological light. While there is no strong biblical or historical evidence to support the idea that Jesus took a Nazarite vow, and archaeological discoveries support the existence of Nazareth in the 1st century CE, these ideas are part of broader debates over how to understand the life of Jesus within its historical and religious context. The overwhelming consensus among historians and archaeologists today is that Nazareth existed during Jesus’ time, and the traditional Christian understanding of Jesus being “from Nazareth” is well-supported.

———————————————- the original blog post excerpt

You said:
unpack and elaborate on this, from a web page blog
The Edomeans were forcefully converted to Talmudic Judaism by John “The Hammer” Hyrcanus, and the Ashkenazis by their king Bulan

Christ warned about these people in the Revelation to John in Ch. 2:9 and about their demise in Ch. 3:9.

Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but do LIE (Idumeans); behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

The Ashkenazis will also be defeated in the Middle-East. They never learn, and keep doing the same thing over and over with their brutal, genocidal nature, expecting a different result, which is, ironically, Ashkenazi Einstein’s definition of INSANITY. When will they EVER learn? They never will, which is why not one of them will survive The Reaping of the Earth.

The Ashkenazis’ fatal mistake was converting to Talmudic Judaism, and thus allying themselves with the Edomean/Idumean counterfeit-Jews, who had Jesus the Nazarite* (Numbers 6:13) crucified, that God told mankind through His Prophet Obadiah would be totally eradicated during The Reaping, and not one of them would survive.

Jesus was a Nazarite, NOT from a non-existent Nazareth. Nazareth did not exist until the 4th century AD. Jesus grew up safely in Glastonbury, in England, his mother Mary’s home country.

Obadiah 1:1 The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord “I AM” concerning Edom; We have heard a rumour from the “I AM”, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle.
1:2 Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: thou art greatly despised.
1:3 The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation [is] high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?
1:4 Though thou exalt [thyself] as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the “I AM”.
1:5 If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night, (how art thou cut off!) would they not have stolen till they had enough? if the grapegatherers came to thee, would they not leave [some] grapes?
1:6 How are [the things] of Esau searched out! [how] are his hidden things sought up!
1:7 All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee [even] to the border: the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, [and] prevailed against thee; [they that eat] thy bread have laid a wound under thee: [there is] none understanding in him.
1:8 Shall I not in that day, saith the “I AM”, even destroy the wise [men] out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?
1:9 And thy mighty [men], O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter.
1:10 For [thy] violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever.
1:11 In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou [wast] as one of them.
1:12 But thou shouldest not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger; neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction; neither shouldest thou have spoken proudly in the day of distress.
1:13 Thou shouldest not have entered into the gate of My people in the day of their calamity; yea, thou shouldest not have looked on their affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid [hands] on their substance in the day of their calamity;
1:14 Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.
1:15 For the day of the “I AM” [is] near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head.
1:16 For as ye have drunk upon My Holy Mountain (Moriah), [so] shall all the heathen drink continually, yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though they had not been.
1:17 But upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the House of Jacob shall possess their possessions.
1:18 And the House of Jacob shall be a fire, and the House of Joseph a flame, and the House of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be [any] remaining of the House of Esau; for the “I AM” hath spoken [it].
1:19 And [they of] the South shall possess the mount of Esau; and [they of] the plain the Philistines: and they shall possess the fields of Ephraim, and the fields of Samaria: and Benjamin [shall possess] Gilead.
1:20 And the captivity of this host of the children of Israel [shall possess] that of the Canaanites, [even] unto Zarephath; and the captivity of Jerusalem, which [is] in Sepharad, shall possess the cities of the South.
1:21 And saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the “I AM”’s.