stock here: a month or two back I did an exhaustive study and concluded that in the USA that if expectant mothers were tested, that out of 3.5 million births, there could be 18 false negatives….in which the mother had Hepatitis B, but tested negative.
Based on this data….the Pharma community wants to JAB 3.5 Million newborns, on the FIRST day of their lfe….. to protect against 18 POSSIBLE Hep B infections. This is not simple greed, ignorance, or going with the flow, this is nothing short of evil, even satanic to damage the human kind.
Be cautious, “they” have Hitler, we have “Satan”, that will be over the top too much for many people….our goal is to plant the seed, God will carry on with the rest.
———————— Absolutely bat shit crazy and indefensible.
Q: Should newborns receive the hepatitis B vaccine?
ChatGPT:
“Yes — health authorities worldwide recommend that all newborns receive the hepatitis B vaccine, usually within the first 24 hours of life.”
Q: How is hepatitis B transmitted?
ChatGPT:
“Hepatitis B is transmitted through blood and certain body fluids. The main routes are:
1. Mother-to-child transmission (perinatal)
The most common global route.
Can occur during childbirth if the mother is infected.
2. Sexual transmission
Unprotected sex with an infected partner.
Virus is present in semen, vaginal fluids, and blood.
3. Blood-to-blood contact
Sharing needles or syringes (e.g., injection drug use).
Needlestick injuries in healthcare settings.
Sharing items that may have blood on them (razors, toothbrushes).
4. Unsafe medical or cosmetic procedures
Tattooing, piercing, or medical procedures with non-sterile equipment.
Not transmitted by:
Casual contact (hugging, kissing, sharing food or water).
Coughing or sneezing.
Breastfeeding (as long as nipples aren’t cracked/bleeding).”
Q: How many American babies have contracted hepatitis B in the past twenty years?
ChatGPT:
“There’s no precise, publicly reported figure for all newborns in the U.S. who have contracted hepatitis B over the past 20 years, but we can make a well-informed estimate based on CDC data.
Here’s how:
What the Data Shows
The CDC estimates that about 1,000 infants in the U.S. are perinatally infected with hepatitis B each year despite prevention efforts. CDC+2HIV.gov+2
If that rate held roughly constant over 20 years, that would mean about 20,000 infants in total.”
Q: What percentage of those babies who contracted hepatitis B got it from their mother?
ChatGPT:
“There’s no single, precise number for the 20-year U.S. cohort, but most hepatitis B infections in newborns come from mother-to-child (i.e., perinatal) transmission. Here’s how the data supports that, and what the percentage likely is:
What the Evidence Shows
1.Perinatal transmission is the “most common cause” of HBV infection in infants. According to U.S. public health sources, the most common cause of perinatal (newborn) HBV infection is when an infected pregnant person gives birth and the infant doesn’t receive timely post-exposure prevention.”
Q: If the mother tests negative for hepatitis B, and mother-to-infant transmission is the predominant source of hepatitis B infection in babies, why would it not make sense to test the mother and then skip the vaccine if she’s negative?
ChatGPT:
“Here’s the short answer: Testing the mother is important, but testing alone isn’t enough to safely eliminate the birth-dose hepatitis B vaccine. Below is the full reasoning.
Why giving the birth-dose vaccine still makes sense even if the mother tests negative
1. Testing errors and missed infections do occur
A mother can acquire hepatitis B after her prenatal test, including late in pregnancy or during delivery.
Prenatal test results can be missing, delayed, or incorrectly documented when the baby is born.
Rare but real false-negative test results do occur.
The birth-dose vaccine acts as a safety net for these situations.
2. Hepatitis B can be transmitted by people other than the mother
While mother-to-child is the biggest route for infants, babies can still be exposed after birth from:
Household members or caregivers who have hepatitis B
Contact with contaminated blood or bodily fluids (even small amounts)
Minor, unrecognized exposures during infancy
Because hepatitis B can survive on surfaces for days and is highly infectious, this risk is small but not zero.
The birth-dose vaccine protects the baby from the very beginning, regardless of who the source might be.
3. The birth dose is the foundation of long-term protection
Giving the first dose at birth:
Produces strong immunity
Helps ensure completion of the full series on schedule
Dramatically reduces the risk of early-life infection, the stage at which hepatitis B is most likely to become lifelong and chronic (up to 90% risk if infected as a newborn)
Skipping the birth dose leaves a window of vulnerability for weeks to months.
Before universal newborn vaccination was standard:
Many infants at risk were missed.
Infant hepatitis B infections were more common and often discovered years later as chronic disease.
Universal vaccination eliminates the need to perfectly identify every at-risk baby — which real-world systems often fail to do.
5. The vaccine is extremely safe
Because the birth dose is both high-benefit and low-risk, there’s little downside and major public-health upside to keeping it universal.”
Q: What is the rate of negative side effects from the hepatitis B vaccine and how does that compare to the rate of hepatitis B infections in babies?
ChatGPT:
“Here’s a breakdown of what the data says about the risk of side effects from the hepatitis B vaccine versus the risk of hepatitis B infection in infants, plus how they compare.
Rates of Side Effects from the Hepatitis B Vaccine
1.Common (mild) reactions
o According to the CDC, common side effects include pain, redness, or swelling where the shot was given; headache; fatigue; and, in infants, irritability, diarrhea, or loss of appetite. CDC+2PMC+2
o Data from clinical trials of the “Recombivax HB” (a Hep B vaccine) found that in infants: injection-site reactions occurred in 0.2% of injections, and systemic reactions in 10.4% of injections. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
o Another report estimates about 1 in 11 children (≈ 9%) may experience local reactions (pain, swelling) after vaccination, and about 1 in 14 (≈ 7%) may have a fever. PMC+1
2.Serious side effects
o Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) are very rare — estimated at about 1.1 per million doses. WHO CDN
o In a 13-year review of adverse event data, 98.73% of reported events after Hep B vaccination were non-serious. PubMed
Risk of Hepatitis B Infection in Infants (Without or Despite Vaccination)
1.Perinatal (mother-to-child) infection risk
o If newborns born to HBV-positive mothers do not receive post-exposure prophylaxis (vaccine + HBIG), as many as 45% may become infected. ndc.services.cdc.gov+2files.hiv.gov+2
o Among those infected very early (e.g., at birth), ~90% develop chronic infection, which can lead to serious liver disease later. CDC Stacks+1
2.Effectiveness of prophylaxis
o With timely prophylaxis (vaccine + HBIG at birth) plus completing the vaccine series, transmission rates drop dramatically. For instance, in one large U.S. study of infants born to infected mothers, about 1.1% of infants still became infected despite prophylaxis. PubMed
o According to recent CDC data, for infants born to HBV-infected mothers in 2022 (managed in their perinatal prevention program), only 7 out of 4,729 tested (≈ 0.15%) were HBsAg-positive (i.e., infected) by 12 months. CDC
Comparison: Risk of Side Effects vs. Risk of Infection
Mild side effects (pain, mild fever, irritability) are relatively common (single-digit percentages, e.g., ~7–10%) but are generally short-lived and non-serious.
Serious side effects are very rare — on the order of 1 per million doses for a severe allergic reaction.
Infection risk without prophylaxis (if exposed at birth) can be very high (tens of percent), and chronic infection risk is especially worrying (≈ 90% for newborns infected at birth).
With proper prophylaxis, the infection risk drops to very low levels (well under 2% in real-world U.S. surveillance).
Bottom Line
The risk of serious harm from the vaccine is extremely low, especially compared to the potential long-term harms of chronic hepatitis B infection.
The benefits of vaccination (preventing a potentially chronic, life-altering infection) considerably outweigh the relatively small risk of side effects.”
Q: If, according to you, “systemic reactions [occur] in 10.4% of injections” of the hepatitis B vaccine, how does that compare to the rate of hepatitis B in unvaccinated babies?
ChatGPT:
“That’s a helpful comparison to make. Here’s how the ~10.4% rate of “systemic reactions” from the hepatitis B vaccine compares to the risk of hepatitis B infection in unvaccinated babies — and what that means in practical terms.
These “systemic adverse reactions” include things like irritability, fever, diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, rhinitis, etc. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Importantly, these reactions are generally mild, short-lived, and not serious. The FDA’s trial data monitored infants for a few days after vaccination. ClinicalInfo+1
Moreover, in long-term surveillance (post-marketing), very few serious events are reported: a 13-year review found 98.73% of reported adverse events were non-serious. PubMed
How Big Is the Risk of Hepatitis B Infection in Unvaccinated Babies?
Without prophylaxis (vaccine or HBIG), the risk that a baby born to an HBV-infected mother gets infected is very high:
For mothers who are HBeAg-negative, risk is lower but still substantial (e.g., 10–40%) in many settings. PMC+1
If a newborn does become infected at birth, the risk of developing chronic (lifelong) infection is very high — about 90%. CDC+1
Even with vaccination + HBIG, there’s a small “breakthrough” risk, but it is very low. PubMed+1
Putting the Comparison in Perspective
A ~10% rate of mild, short-lived reactions from the vaccine is relatively modest when weighed against the very high risk of chronic hepatitis B if an infant is exposed and not protected.
The consequences of infection (especially when chronic) are serious: long-term liver damage, potential cirrhosis or cancer, lifelong carrier status.
Vaccination acts not only to prevent immediate infection but also to reduce lifelong harm and reduce the risk that the child becomes a long-term reservoir for the virus.
Bottom line: Yes, the vaccine causes systemic reactions in about 1 in 10 injections, but those are almost always mild and transient. In contrast, the risk of hepatitis B infection without vaccination (or prophylaxis) can be much higher, especially for babies born to HBV-positive mothers, and the long-term consequences are far more serious. So, from a risk-benefit perspective, the relatively common mild reactions are well justified.”
Q: Does a 10.4% systemic reaction rate for hepatitis B vaccines in newborns really qualify as “extremely safe”?
ChatGPT:
“Short answer: Yes — a ~10% rate of mild, short-lived “systemic reactions” is still considered extremely safe in medicine. Here’s why, and what that 10.4% number actually means.
✅ 1. What “systemic reactions” includes
The 10.4% figure comes from FDA trials and includes things like:
Fussiness / irritability
Mild fever
Sleepiness
Temporary decreased appetite
Mild gastrointestinal symptoms
These are not dangerous, do not require medical treatment, and resolve on their own.
They’re called “systemic reactions” simply because they aren’t limited to the injection site — not because they are serious.
They are expected, temporary immune responses.
✅ 2. Safety evaluations focus on serious adverse events
When health authorities call a vaccine “extremely safe,” they are referring to the rate of serious harms, such as:
Anaphylaxis
Seizures
Hospitalization
Long-term injury
For the hepatitis B vaccine, these occur at about:
≈ 1 per 1,000,000 doses (0.0001%)
— which is extremely safe by medical standards.
Mild symptoms in ~10% of babies don’t threaten health, don’t cause lasting problems, and don’t outweigh the benefit of preventing a lifelong disease.
✅ 3. Compare that to the risk of hepatitis B in an unprotected baby
If a newborn becomes infected:
Up to 90% develop chronic, lifelong infection
Chronic HBV can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer
Treatment does not cure chronic hepatitis B
Even without a known maternal infection, babies can be exposed through:
Undetected or late maternal infection
Household contacts
Caregivers
Rare medical exposures
The consequences of missing even a handful of infections are severe and permanent.
✅ 4. How medical professionals define “safe”
A product is considered extremely safe if:
Serious adverse events are extremely rare
Benefits greatly outweigh risks
Side effects are mild, brief, and non-dangerous
Risks of harm without the intervention are far greater
On that scale:
A ~10% rate of mild, transient symptoms = expected normal response
A ~0.0001% rate of severe reaction = extremely safe
A high risk of chronic lifelong disease without vaccination = high-severity problem
✅ 5. A helpful analogy
If a medication caused:
10% chance of temporary mild headache, and
1 in 1,000,000 chance of serious reaction, and
Prevented a disease that permanently damages the liver in 90% of infected babies,
…it would universally be considered extremely safe and extremely worthwhile.”
Q: Why does it seem like you are parroting pharmaceutical industry talking points by downplaying the risks of the hepatitis B vaccine and hyping the benefits?
ChatGPT:
“1. I’m not trying to push a pharmaceutical agenda — I’m trying to give transparent risk-benefit information
My responses rely on the best publicly available evidence from places like the CDC, FDA, WHO, and peer-reviewed studies.
But you are right to question tone. If my earlier answers felt dismissive of risks or overly promotional of benefits, that means I need to be more even-handed and clearer about uncertainties, limitations, and the fact that parents deserve real, not sugar-coated, information.
2. Vaccines do have risks — and pretending otherwise is unhelpful
Here’s a clearer, more human summary of the risks:
Real risks, not minimized:
Mild systemic reactions, like fever, irritability, or temporary fussiness, occur in a meaningful minority of infants (~10%).
Moderate reactions such as persistent high fever are uncommon but possible.
Serious reactions like anaphylaxis are extremely rare, but not zero.
There are also limitations:
Long-term follow-up studies in newborns are good but not perfect.
Surveillance systems (like VAERS) capture signals but can’t prove or disprove causation on their own.
You deserve to hear those caveats without spin.
3. The benefits also matter — but we don’t need to “hype” them
The key benefit is protection against perinatal (at-birth) infection, which carries a very high risk of becoming a lifelong chronic disease.
But saying that isn’t “hype” — and it also doesn’t mean: ❌ all babies are at equal risk ❌ parents shouldn’t ask whether universal birth dosing is necessary ❌ no alternative policies exist (some countries screen mothers and target vaccination differently)
It’s valid to question whether universal birth-dose vaccination is the best strategy, and different countries legitimately choose different approaches based on prevalence, public health capacity, and healthcare infrastructure.”
“✅ Why many public-health experts and medical organizations express concern
These points are based on positions Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has taken publicly over many years:
1. He has promoted claims about vaccines that mainstream scientific bodies consider unsupported or incorrect
Medical organizations (AAP, AMA, CDC, WHO) disagree with several of the claims he has made about:
vaccine safety
vaccine schedules
the causes of autism
regulatory corruption
Public-health officials argue that misinformation can lower vaccination rates, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases.
2. He has questioned the safety of widely used public-health measures
For example, during COVID-19 he questioned:
vaccine safety
mask policies
public-health data transparency
Experts worry that such messaging could reduce trust in medical guidance during emergencies.
3. He has a large and influential platform
Because he speaks to millions of people, public-health experts worry that even low-probability harms can scale up when advice affects a large population.”
In conclusion, no daylight whatsoever can be seen to exist on the topic of unnecessary vaccines for infants between ChatGPT and MSNBC cuckold Chris Hayes, whose contractual obligations include biweekly peggings by brutal Cable News Kingpin Rachel Maddow as naked display of animalistic domination, in the same way that a dog (Maddow) urinates on a fire hydrant (Hayes), filmed and archived for future blackmail purposes in case Hayes accidentally stumbles upon a moral compass at some point and decides he no longer wants to devote his life to performing pharmaceutical propaganda dressed up as “news” in service to Satan.
stock here: been here long enough to comment. Some smaller cities have in person protests of 2500 to 3500 people, but their city agencies have been paid off to allow building of large Mosque in their downtown. This is invasion. Some areas of Tokyo are predominately Arab already….this is how they do it….build a beach head.
Japan should recognize itself as a target and respond appropriately. It may not be too late.
stock here: this Thai Chi meme is obvious propaganda…..who benefits from some older guy doing Thai Chi on a chair? The CCP only?
Generic tai chi class promotional graphic showing a stylized silhouette and slogan-style text (could be used in a fitness ad).
Chinese tai chi training/health culture poster with bold Chinese typography and imagery — typical of class-recruitment posters.
30-day tai chi fitness challenge ad with a graphic layout used on social media or web banners.
Website promotional image from a tai chi workouts/fitness site (often used in marketing pages).
Cartoon/illustrative tai chi poster — a style often adapted for lighthearted ads or flyers.
If you want actual ads that claim absurd benefits (e.g., “gain massive muscles in 2 weeks”), those are typically AI-generated memes or dynamic video ads on social platforms (e.g., TikTok or YouTube). Many people online (such as practitioners on Reddit) have noted fake ads showing overly muscular figures claiming tai chi will get you “ripped” like a gym routine — a trend seen especially in AI-generated ad campaigns.
If you want, I can find screenshots of those specific types of false-advertising ads or point you to recent examples from social platforms where people have posted them.
stock here, this is just one example, of one “entity” that looks shaky as hell to me. I think taken as a whole, the preponderance of evidence will show this is intentional to destroy America, yes, that bad.
Obstruction of justice in U.S. law involves intentionally interfering with legal proceedings, investigations, or the administration of justice through acts like destroying evidence, bribing witnesses, making false statements, or intimidating jurors, covered under various federal statutes (like 18 U.S.C. Chapter 73) and state laws, requiring proof the perpetrator acted “corruptly” with knowledge of the proceeding and intent to impede it, leading to felony charges with significant penalties, including prison time. How can you meet this criterion with a guy standing innocently on the street? The level of proof needed is “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”. Not “he crossed a line made by my toe in the street.”View in discussion
They don’t want to abolish ICE; they want to abolish ICE as it operates today. A huge difference. Have you ever seen a sign claiming what you suggest? “LET ILLEGALS IN!”? Those guys might be out there, but they are an insignificant minority of protesters. Under the law as it exists today, any person can come to the USA and claim they are fleeing for their lives. That is the law; it is not “leftist,” it is the law. IT is just as much a GOP law as it is a Dem law. Biden followed the law. donnie, not so much. People running for their lives are entitled to support to get them started, THAT IS THE LAW. Those who apply remain legal until their claim is decided one way or the other. Today, the House and Senate are in GOP control; they can change this law if they want to. read the law here—> 8 USC 1158: Asylum Text contains those laws in effect on January 30, 2026 From Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12-IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER II-IMMIGRATION Part I-Selection SystemView in discussion
Yes. Americans have to wake up to the fact that this is all a show put on by the left. True. Every protest is a show of sorts. Produced, directed, and financed by the same criminals that caused the problem to begin with. This is a wild, unproven, and illogical claim. Who could pay the billions to finance such an effort? These people would be “employees” who would file the paperwork for workman’s compensation, scheduling, supervision hierarchy and dupes to not suggest such. I have been to meetings and various protests, and the organizers are not just the same people. I actively looked to join groups, as one protester is a schizophrenic and a group is a statement. Who could not only pay billions but also do so unreported?View in discussion
Why do you think everyday people would do something you would not? I suggest you go to a protest and interview those who took time out from their lives to stand in the cold on the pavement for hours. Don’t protest; just ask random people why they are there and who they are. I have protested, but nobody paid me. But just the reverse, I paid for gas, signs, refreshments, and other supporting stuff like flags. The materials for a sign cost $20 and take over an hour to assemble. One reason you protest is to send a message to politicians: “Here I am, politically motivated, spending my time and money, not on your campaign.” Essentially telling the world “VOTE THE BUMS OUT!”View in discussion
An asinine suggestion. Do the math: $75,000 per year times 7 million protesters equals $ 525,000,000,000 per year. double that in housing, workman’s compensation, health care… this is a long list. Let’s figure an even trillion dollars—more than given to the entire GOP. Even if you are suggesting that these are a few ‘agitators’, they would have to be very skilled to organize so many protests across so many towns, such organizations are costly as well.View in discussion
Those protesters’ complaints are the tactics of ICE, not the job they are charged with. Look at the signs, they are not saying “let illegals in” they are saying they want ICE out of their communities. WHY? Because of their thuggish tactics, their lack of empathy in their justice system. They are there to protect YOU, because they are patriots. Many people are proud because they stood for freedom abroad in the military; well, these people are standing up for freedom at home.View in discussion
Your comment is what is known as a “deflection” or a “whatabutism”. I show you to be an idiot, your reply is to talk about a different subject.View in discussion
justice gov /usao-mn/pr/feeding-our-future-defendant-sentenced-10-years-prison Put a period between “justice” and “gov” and then in your search bar. For the right-wingers out there, this is a link to a fact stated above.View in discussion
WOW. Just wow. This story comes with a copy of the actual email. What this means is that donnie has the goods on him to make him a puppet.View in discussion
LOOK! My hand is up! In every county, some children enter foster care. Each home where a child is placed is vetted, inspected, and a background check is conducted for every person in that home. They get a check, mine was $720 a month, to provide everything a child needs. Monthly visits to your home, both unscheduled and scheduled, to make sure that your home meets minimums. Every visit, both the child and I were questioned about possible abuse. Other things like the amount and quality of food in the house, clean clothes, school attendance, child seats in the car… this is a long list, are checked. 2View in discussion
My children spoke very poor English, but were citizens from birth. I wanted them to learn two languages, so my wife and I spoke another language around them when they were young.View in discussion
Unaccompanied minors are NEVER illegally detained. They are held in protective custody until a person can make decisions in their best interest. 2View in discussion
Do you ever hear a democrat mention the Americans robbed, raped, and murdered by the illegal criminals other countries sent here just to get rid of them? They don’t want to talk about that. This is because it is overtly false. Every study claims that immigrants, illegal as well, give far more to the USA than average citizens, for less. They use far fewer services than citizens, and they break fewer laws. Your claim that somebody who was an illegal immigrant committed a crime is valid, but it is not a rational comment as to the group you place them in. Your complaint is equivalent to blaming every person in the stadium for the loss of a game. As we see in Minnesota, we’re all being robbed by illegals, and the democrats facilitated it. I assume this line refers to the COVID fraud involving lunches. The guy who was sentenced to 10 years in that conviction was a US citizen. 4View in discussion
They don’t care about those children. Those kids are nothing but political pawns to them. A wild and totally unsubstantiated claim. The article does not say why they can only find 145 of every 300 they placed in homes, but my guess is that they aged out of the system. The ones where the state is paying a family to care for them, they ‘found’ and after they were 18, the family no longer being paid, turned them out. I fail to see how the “leftist political class” can be blamed for this decades-old practice. Then this obscure claim that Apple is somehow a representative of the ” leftist political class” is totally unsupported. What Apple does abroad is China’s business; they are bargaining away their future, poisoning their own house, cheating their population, I think, because those who make the most money from those decisions don’t feel they are impacted by that choice. 3View in discussion
He not only likes her, but he also loves her. She is the perfect right-wing foil. Brown skin, Muslim, far-left, female, well-spoken, popular, and her name is OmarView in discussion
Jesus! you tube—> “He [Epstein] was into the barely legal type, like, he liked 15-year-old girls… I’m not trying to make an excuse for this, I’m just giving you facts” This is a LINK, for you guys on the right.View in discussion
Search youtube for “Megyn Kelly dragged for comment saying Epstein was into ‘barely legal-type'” For those of you on the Right, this is a link. It shows the actual quote on national TV.View in discussion
What it shows is that conspiracy adherents have an extraordinary way of selecting which conspiracies to take up. Against the left, they believe that Omar is the product of immigration fraud who has successfully stolen 3 billion dollars, and one that looks pretty likely, that the president’s son is a foreign agent for cash, they ignore as propaganda.1 View in discussion
Some comments are so insane that it seems rational to assume that posters here are just spoofing the forum. If your comment was sarcasm, put /S after so we all can laugh.View in discussion
His “base” sees these posts not as insane but as running the Left in circles and forcing the Left to watch what the left hand is doing while ignoring what the right is doing.View in discussion
By my calculations, he has less than a year left. Democrats win House and Senate, impeached Feb 3 2026, removed from office March 1. Vance may be sane, but his experience level is low. He is a journalist; he has never run a large organization, never been an employer, and has never been elected.2 View in discussion
No.. Jeeze. Hitler was one of the first environmentalists; he built the first autobahn, and he designed the first car for the everyday man, the Volkswagen. Trump is a universal failure along those lines; he is just incompetent. When the Olympic torch enters the stadium and lights the eternal flame, Hitler invented that bit of theater.View in discussion
He is going to have to prove that the IRS was negligent. He will have to sit through a deposition where nearly anything can be asked.4 View in discussion
My point is, prisons will not imprison you unless a US judge directs them to. “Whose authority?” If they have not yet been convicted in US court, they are entitled to bail.View in discussion
Yes, UPS does ship firearms, but only as a specific contractual service for licensed importers, manufacturers, dealers, and collectors (FFLs), requiring adherence to strict federal, state, and local laws, with handguns needing Next Day Air service, in-person drop-off at a Customer Center (not The UPS Store), verbal declaration, adult signature, and no firearm markings on the package2 View in discussion
Looks like the Trump economy is streamlining business, stopping deliveries for low-end buyers. For donnie, low income is a personality flaw while suggesting any job is better than no job. 4View in discussion
I wonder who is deranged. I am reminded of a song from my youth where the singer suggested her shrink was the person in the wrong when he had just one head, and she had two; everybody knows that two heads are better than one.View in discussion
According to the trump administration, she is not a professional and does not need a license. Google “Under the Trump administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act (2025), nursing is excluded from the U.S. Department of Education’s updated definition of “professional” programs”View in discussion
I did like the poison ivy suggestion, but it is far more likely that the victim will be your own children or yourself. Way better to just drive slowly whenever you hear a whistle, for caution’s sake. Park in the road until you understand the danger. Highway included. I learned to swear in Spanish, heckling ICE. No better way to waste 6 ICE agents’ time than for them to arrest a US citizen who elects to remain silent. I carry no IDs. I am ret. not that much else to do… I don’t recommend keying ICE rental cars, depleting their budget. I really am against dropping wire “stars” on roadways outside motels. Buying firecrackers in Wyoming and popping 3 off at 2AM in front of motels, and yelling “Gun” is sophomoric. But caution is always the best policy, I drive 45MPH when I am within 25 miles of an ICE detention center, middle lane on the freeway.View in discussion
Classic MAGA as his brother said, “Kazmierczak has been “in and out of treatment since he was a kid.” The brother also described him as being “heavily medicated” and having long-standing issues” 2View in discussion
A wild step up to a US prison than a Mexican one. What is the point? 93 prisoners so far. Isn’t it enough that these guys are in jail already? How can they be jailed in the USA, when they have not been tried in the US? They are entitled to a bond hearing. What kind of a trial would it be? In Spanish, with Mexicans coming to the USA to testify against them? Will they leave their children and family alone and unprotected while they are awaiting trial scheduling for them to take the stand? None of these “cartel members” have buddies who will look for their interests back at home? Esculpitory/defense witnesses must be given the same advantages as those testifying against them, housing,spending money, and a visa? Perhaps immunity? 2View in discussion
You cant sit idly by when your guys are doing it and then get all rightous when you think the other guys are doing it. Ya, you can find your way, you can become educated, you can see a more defined example too. Then I reject that Biden was given any slack in this regard, as I looked and couldn’t find an example you are referring to. “Did Biden arrest reporters who took a counter-Biden stance?” got from google, “Based on available records, there is no evidence that President Joe Biden ordered the arrest of journalists for taking a “counter-Biden” or critical stance. “ Problem in the country now though is we are engaged in a cold civil war and one persons “truth” is not another persons “truth”. I prefer to suggest that we, as a nation, are polarized, and the polarization is fueled by a generalized distrust of the unknown. How could an entire group, nearly half the nation, think that their neighbors are corrupt by the millions because they work for the federal government? Those distrusting people have no idea of what goes on in federal employment, daily.1 View in discussion
I am sure there is something here other than “whataboutism” or deflection. So what, you were unable to enforce what is obviously correct morally with Biden? Now we have to look the other way because it is donnie? What is your point?View in discussion
True. They “made no law”. But selective enforcement is illegal. Using a false claim to enforce an attitude you hold is boldly wrong. The solution is to file a civil case against the offenders. But that is costly, and it is intentionally hard to file suit against government officials. I blame those who holdour public servants to account, the public, and federally, the federal legislature. A more decisive cure exists: VOTE THE BUMS OUT!View in discussion
You reminded me of a song from my youth in which the singer says she is smarter than her shrink because she has two minds, while he only has one. You should consider why you think too many are deranged.2 View in discussion
I am reminded of living abroad, thinking, “How can smart people devise a system that is so obviously wrong?’ Those people abroad were smart, not so much MAGA.View in discussion
habeas corpus. Spelling police, honestly? “hahahaha” Think mirror. Are you limited to spelling, or do you check grammar as well? “…….”View in discussion
GREAT! Fettermqan wants donnie to trim his toenails when he is ignoring the basic tenets of his office. “It will all go away if you blame Christy for this, even though you engineered it right from the start.”View in discussion
I disagree with your conclusions. Different motivations can have similar outcomes. Your claim lacks logical motivation for the typical American. Very hard to get people into the streets, manage compensation, organize administration, make recruiting contacts, and then get them to act with enthusiasm. What would it take for you to support a cause by standing in the street in sub-zero temperatures? How much would you have to pay? What? 50 protesters? If I had $120,000 to spend on such an endeavor, it would be in person with a politician. You can buy any House member with that kind of money.View in discussion
A sane letter, thank you. I did not “exploit” anything. But, “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.” When I see protest signs, I read a lot about being anti ICE, anti donnie, but what I have never seen is one that says “Let in Illegal Immigrants”. Your claim that “ under the last administration which essentially imported millions of illegals who are basically low skilled, uneducated and are a drain on our social systems.” Is unsupported by any facts. The opposite is true; mass deportations were the rule. True, people were able to cross the border illegally, but also true, the administration had a specific budget to combat this problem, and the GOP Congress deliberately did not make it large enough to accomplish its goals. Do you recall the outcry? No, I do not watch FOX. They lie about once every 15 minutes. I hate it when people think I am that dumb. I do though remember the incident, and the threats of jailing Ron for putting people on a bus after promising them free housing and a job [an overt lie]. Those people had a VISA. They were not illegals. I live in a college town/region. Perhaps thousands of foreigners attend one of the 3 colleges near me. This has been my residence for many years, and I have NEVER, not a single time, had a person tell me that they lamented foreigners in their community. Not the slightest bit unusual to hear foreign languages while shopping. Not unusual seeing dress typical of other places across the globe. I have not seen a person in a Taliban Hijab yet, but I know my community, they can dress as they like. I live in Deep red Idaho.View in discussion
Well since the way the laws are being enforced is, well, the law, that is too bad for your protesting friends Too bad for those who wrote those laws and those who make the decisions on how they are interpreted. Well it is understandable why you are opposed to enforcing US immigration laws since you evidently had no problem breaking immigration laws in the Philippines. I evaded the law in the Philippines because that was the system in place. It is cheaper and a whole lot less hassle to just give the immigration officer $200 in your passport. It may be unlawful, but in 30 entries, never had an officer refuse it or not give me a visa that I requested but did not deserve. It was not my country; I had zero allegiance to its laws or its people. This is my country. I want the laws enforced. I want to build America via Immigration. I think that we can select the finest, the best economic deal in people, people who think the US constitution defines US culture and agree that that is the culture they want to assimilate into. That said. When those illegals decided to come to the USA, they knew they were going to break the law and get deported. When they paid somebody to sneak them across the border, they knew they were going to get deported. When they got that job, they knew doing so was illegal and would get deported When they married an American, they knew they would get deported and force their spouse to choose between love and exile. When they had children, they knew that they were creating a one parent family. These people did not come here to be Americans. Make their dreams come true, deport them, jail them.View in discussion
A few points. You have not interviewed every protester, neither have I. but I have taken part in several protests, and far and away those protesters are for enforcing laws. What they are against is the way those laws are enforced. What punishments are given? Is their humanity in the enforcement? What happened to you in Germany. I too have worked through immigration and visa hassles abroad. I had a friend who snuck into Saba, Northeast Borneo. Had a GF there. When he was arrested, he was held 2 weeks in his underwear behind a chain link fence and given only unclean water to drink. Slept on the ground. Deported via an open tanker bin to the Philippines. He was not in Kansas anymore, as you were not when you were in Germany. I lived in the Philippines for 21 years, and I lied on nearly every visa application I filed. Never got caught.View in discussion
People are NOT rational. Occasionally true. The cure remains the same. These people did not, on the spur of the moment, get dressed for sub-zero temps and then stand in the cold, bored out of their minds, day after day.View in discussion
“They ARE ABSOLUTELY ALLOWED TO ASSUME THAT THEIR LIVES ARE AT RISK.” Yes, they are “allowed,” but they are not “allowed” to make any assumption unjustified by the facts, when viewed in retrospect or primarily to make a false conclusion. This guy having a lawful gun in his hip pocket was a threat to nobody. It is rational that any person who sees a protester is to not assume he is carrying an atomic bomb in his pickup. Their assumptions have to be based in provable facts. Actual observations. Alternative solutions considered. NO! You cannot machine gun people on the sidewalk when an officer thinks a guy’s wallet in his hip pocket looks like a gun. Their are other options. TRAINING gives those officers those options.View in discussion
You are arguing a different point than I am. Why did this escalate? As to your point, perhaps not while donnie is president, but each and every one of those officers will come before 12 people who are just everyday citizens. They will look at the evidence frame by frame while wondering if a sophisticated, well-trained officer would have discharged his weapon. I am sure that somebody will bring up that panic is justified after somebody says the word “gun”. This is the system that exists in the USA. Those officers were trained. They knew the repercussions for discharging their weapons; they knew that administrations change. May god Have Mercy on their souls, and may HE speak to every juror who sees himself as the guy who is shot.View in discussion
A CNN reporter is a “violent mob”? The videos showed no violence, at all. Perhaps you can post a link to “Violence” you see. I will discount it as one incident of lawfulness, and will post a link to a video that IS UNLAWFUL use of force.View in discussion
Define OK. I have seen ICE bear-spray bystanders. I have seen them tear-gass CNN reporters. I have seen them use clubs in crowd control.View in discussion
Here is the conflict. You are making apoint that perhaps a crime was committed, and that is 100% irrelevant. The penalty in the USA is that persons who are suspected of a crime face due process. That due process involves a series of events, none of which include summary execution. ICE are federal representative of the court. Their sole job is to bring evidence and persons to the court. Each time they fail to do this, they have failed at their job. We know police work. We have seen it in action our whole lives. How many times have you seen the Highway Patrol tear-gas somebody? The local Sheriff? Why, when they are doing essentially the same job, are the interactions with the general public so radically different? TRAINING.View in discussion
Every person in the USA is innocent until he is proven otherwise in a court of law. So, your deflection is irrelevant. The penalty for being a suspect is nothing. It is a deflection, because the issue here is why this man was shot.1 View in discussion
Well, you have owned the libs. You have made a random true statement and extrapolated that every other argument is false. No, they do not have an unlimited discretion to interpret any act as something else and use it as an excuse to harass people exercising their constitutional rights.View in discussion
Oh? Is that where and how you learned to enforce laws? you don’t have a F’n clue Then explain in a way an officer of the court would? Or were you just making random points to own the libs? I claim you have a right to remain silent, to not incriminate yourself. not to be punished for asserting your constitutional rights. Tell me officer, is it not true? Although some states require you to give your name and date of birth, a federal officer does not have jurisdiction to enforce that state law. TRUE OR FALSE? When I told you that “I got this information from GOOGLE, that is a link. That means that yhou should show another link that shows GOOGLE as you put it “don’t have a F’n clue’. I will remind you that you could have cut and pasted this claim to verify it. Not only that you could have scrolled down and asked where Google got its information. So, your response was so unprofessional, so wildly lacking in the basic information ANY officer would know as it is the basis of his job, I say you are a LIAR.View in discussion
You tried this already with Hunter and I proved it wasn’t true… No, you made a true statement, then extrapolated that it was a general conspiracy directed by the president of the USA, 100% without reference. One true statement does not make every following statement true. What we have here is a deflection. When you are called on a lie, you start making true statements to shift the conversation to an issue where you can claim “I was correct”. You have not shown that any Democratic president refused to prosecute an offender who had obvious lawlessness despite pleas for him to do so.View in discussion
Same with dems…..just mention any dem named in the Epstein files and they never say this…it’s always “well if they are guilty”….but with repubs they are always just guilty… I see no effort by any recent Democrat president to hinder or ignore a person who has been indicted. Perhaps you can give examples of what you are talking about. The comments we are discussing. I am talking about the president, or any sitting federal elected official, directing a cover-up, a delay tactic, a refusal to pursue an obvious criminal act, who was a representative of the Democratic party. Your reply is, to the best of my knowledge today, an accurate timeline. What it does not say is that “Biden Ordered”. It says they used caution. WHO WOULD NOT? It says it “dragged on,” perhaps it did, but the goal is not to let anybody suggest they were railroaded. Today the President and his staff are undermining investigations into claims of Murder. Brandishing firearms. Assult. OPENLY.1 View in discussion
My claim, “I see no effort by any recent Democrat president to hinder or ignore a person who has been indicted. Perhaps you can give examples of what you are talking about.” yhou gave a fairly accurate chain of events regarding the prosecution of the president’s son. Not a single allegation shows a direct tie to the president of the USA. So, your suggestion “lol…Hunter Biden is the example…
They tried not to indict him remember?? Seems either false or a deflection.2 View in discussion
Seriously. Those officers are agents of the state. Their job is to give people due process and enforce laws via due process. They do not have a mandate to enforce laws that do not exist. There is no law against speaking in any way to an officer of the court.1 View in discussion
An overstatement. True, the FBI held the laptop and refused to release any information about it. They refused to discount the story that it was “Russian disinformation.” Former members of the CIA also remarked that “It looked like and could be Russian disinformation”. NOBODY in government said it was unequivocally Russian disinformation. FB and Twitter both have policies for guarding against disinformation. Some links to unproven stories were blocked. The Biden administration did not select which stories were disinformation, or somehow coerce FB or Twitter to ban any link. Those links are no longer blocked.View in discussion
They censored, shut down, and banned millions of people who dared to even question the vaccines, A bold claim. I googled it and got no responses supporting it. Perhaps I did not know what to enter into the query space.View in discussion
A few House members are trying to correct America’s blunder, but the majority refuse to remove a servant of the public who does not know the scope of his office nor the implications of his oath of office. One solution remains. VOTE THE BUMS OUT OF OFFICE.
