stock here: I went to Road America with the North Woods Shelby Club, great day of racing, many classics, but also modern out of the box Corvettes and others. It was odd, I had the run of the entire course, able to drive anywhere on the infield. Took 1000 pictures.
stock here: this guy somehow connects with everyone. He did multiple videos in Hawaii.
That’s the entire article.
stock here: The Jesuit’s have aprimary oath, and they must have no greater loyalty, than to the Jesuit leadership, that loyalty exceed the loyalty to God. Don’t believe me, research it.
Jeff Zients (Jew) and Joshua Reid carried the ball on the Fauci Pardon. Noted the pardon is only for Offenses aaginst the United States. Which means he has no pardon for offenses against the States, the people, or even other countries, although I think international is pretty bogus except for stuff like international shipping and the like.
stock here:
They want to give masculinity a bad name. Like Tim Walz.
🚨 JUST IN: Tom Homan DEMOLISHES a heckler interrupting his speech at TPUSA
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 12, 2025
HOMAN: “This guy doesn't have the balls to be an ICE officer!"
"The ONLY thing that surprises me is that he doesn’t have purple hair and a nose ring"
"I GUARANTEE you this guy sits down to pee” 🤣🔥 pic.twitter.com/tEQEyGICS3
stock here: I did a mid-deep dive on this new American Pope, after the Jesuit POS. He is a socialist (at best) globalist, and liftist who will carry all the lies. He did a manuveur last week saying that a marriage can only be between a man and a woman (without defining what that is). I call that a mis-direction before he start laying out the leftist agenda. Which he is now doing.
———————–
Leo is doubling down on his predecessor’s controversial environmental agenda instead of focusing on core Catholic doctrine.
This is the same Pope who’s been called a “WOKE MARXIST POPE” by Trump ally Laura Loomer after his left-wing social media posts surfaced.²
Former Senator Rick Santorum, a devout Catholic, expressed serious concerns about Leo’s direction after the papal election.
“I have very little optimism about the new pontiff,” Santorum said during a Newsmax appearance.³
——————————————————— Look at this spin, amazing.
He warned that humanity’s “dominion over nature” shouldn’t become “tyrannical” but should be “a relationship of reciprocity.”
This kind of language sounds exactly like what you’d hear from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or other Democrat politicians pushing their Green New Deal agenda.
Leo also stressed that the Catholic Church’s involvement in the climate fight is based on the Social Doctrine of the Church, which he’s using to justify this radical departure from traditional Catholic priorities.
stock here: this is gutsy
If the world is interested in secret nuclear programs in the Middle East, there is a country that doesn’t allow ANY IAEA inspectors:
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) June 19, 2025
It’s Israel. https://t.co/rpACsIHo1G
The parasite does not wish to fully kill it’s host, especially when it can steal nuclear weapons from host.
Israel Stole Their Nuclear Weapons From The US
— Bobby Thorne (@Bobby1_x) May 19, 2025
Israel has a not-so-secret "secret" arsenal of nuclear weapons
…and that nuclear arsenal was stolen from the United States
Extending over the period from 1957 to 1978 more than 300 kilograms of uranium 235 (U-235) in the form… pic.twitter.com/06MC1sUFBP
And they attack our Liberty, and those injured survivors who saw their friends and crew mates die, in a 2 hour attack were forced to sign NDAs. I always thought the event was 1 single missile, this is eye opening!
The Attack On The USS Liberty (🧵1/2)
— Bobby Thorne (@Bobby1_x) May 19, 2025
The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, the USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force fighter jets and Israeli Navy torpedo boats that killed 34 US crew members, wounded 171 US crew members, and… pic.twitter.com/cyI7oNetVD
Someone—maybe John Roberts—should explain to KBJ what writing an “opinion” entails.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) July 8, 2025
One of many things KBJ clearly doesn’t understand—or chooses not to.
This is so cringe: pic.twitter.com/Pwicwmfqqr
stock here: i had to try 5 times to get the embed code….but check the comments, they are over whelmingly negative. Amazing they couldn’t even a muster a troll to say something supportive of her.
Summary of comments here:
🔎 Key Themes in the Comments:
🧠 Criticism of Legal Reasoning
Many commenters claim KBJ’s dissent or opinions are not grounded in legal logic but in emotion or personal belief (e.g., “based on her feelings,” “like a diary entry”).
Several say her arguments lack coherence or legal rigor and refer to her writing as “entry-level” or “nonsense.”
🎭 Perception of Performative or Theatrical Behavior
Accusations of grandstanding or dramatics during oral arguments: “goes on and on,” “interrupts others,” “spazzed out theater performance.”
Some mock her vocal tone or delivery as childish or unserious.
🏛 Objections to Identity-Based Appointment
Multiple comments refer to her as a “DEI appointment,” meaning her selection was based on diversity, equity, and inclusion rather than merit.
One user calls her “the DEI experiment,” another references “affirmative action,” and several say Biden appointed her because of her identity.
Some express disbelief that she graduated from Harvard Law.
🧾 Doubt of Authenticity or Qualification
Comments question whether she writes her own opinions or uses AI/staff exclusively.
One sarcastically references a “Temu Law Degree.”
Some suggest she lacks basic constitutional knowledge (e.g., “We are a republic, not a democracy”).
🖊 Autopen Allegation
At least two commenters claim or speculate that KBJ was appointed using an autopen signature, suggesting the process was illegitimate or rushed.
😡 Mockery and Personal Insults
Many comments cross into personal attacks:
Mocking her intelligence (“96 IQ”).
Mocking her speech level (“5th grade level”).
Using demeaning language (e.g., “stupid cow,” “sitcom theater kid”).
🧭 General Tone and Bias
This collection of comments is overwhelmingly negative, mocking, and deeply skeptical of KBJ’s qualifications, independence, and legitimacy as a justice. Most seem to originate from a right-leaning or anti-DEI perspective, with emotional language and identity-driven critique rather than detailed legal counterarguments.
stock here:
I thought SCOTUS opinions were supposed to provide legal analysis. Ketanji Brown Jackson seems to view them as a platform to express her feelings. Maybe she should have become an influencer instead of a Supreme Court justice.
She is only 54, we could be stuck with her for 30 years.
Was her appointment signed by Auto-Pen
Note the resemblance to the World Economic Forum
Someone—maybe John Roberts—should explain to KBJ what writing an “opinion” entails.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) July 8, 2025
One of many things KBJ clearly doesn’t understand—or chooses not to.
This is so cringe: pic.twitter.com/Pwicwmfqqr
Attempted Impeachments
Impeachment of U.S. Supreme Court Justices
To remove a U.S. Supreme Court justice, the process is the same as impeachment for the President — and it’s extremely rare and difficult:
1. Impeachment by the House of Representatives requires a simple majority vote.
2. Conviction by the Senate requires a two-thirds vote.
Only one Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached (Samuel Chase in 1804), and none have ever been removed via impeachment.
Reason for Impeachment: Accused of political bias and arbitrary rulings in trials involving Democratic-Republican defendants.
Outcome: Impeached by the House in 1804. Acquitted by the Senate in 1805.
Significance: Set a precedent discouraging partisan impeachment of justices.
Reason for Impeachment Attempt: Accused by House Minority Leader Gerald Ford of financial misconduct and poor judgment.
Outcome: Investigated by the House Judiciary Committee. No articles of impeachment filed.
Significance: Highlighted the broad and controversial interpretation of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’.
Reason for Impeachment Talk: Accepted $20,000 from a foundation associated with a convicted stock manipulator.
Outcome: Resigned under pressure. No formal proceedings occurred.
Significance: His resignation avoided formal impeachment.
Reason for Impeachment Talk: Accused by political opponents for liberal rulings, especially on civil rights cases.
Outcome: No impeachment resolution was filed.
Significance: Reflective of ideological attacks without substantive misconduct allegations.
Reason for Impeachment Calls: Allegations of perjury and sexual misconduct during confirmation hearings.
Outcome: Some members of Congress called for impeachment inquiries. No articles were filed.
Significance: Demonstrated modern polarization over Supreme Court confirmations.
——————————————- PROCESS FOR REMOVAL
To remove a U.S. Supreme Court justice, the process is the same as impeachment for the President — and it’s extremely rare and difficult:
🔨 1. Impeachment by the House of Representatives
The House must pass articles of impeachment by a simple majority vote (218 of 435 if all members vote).
The charges typically involve “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” — the same constitutional standard as for presidents.
⚖️ 2. Trial and Conviction by the Senate
The Senate then holds a trial, presided over by the Vice President (or sometimes the Chief Justice if the accused is the President).
To convict and remove the justice, two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict (67 of 100 senators if all are present).
📜 Historical Note
Only one Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached:
Justice Samuel Chase (1804) was impeached by the House for political bias and misconduct.
He was acquitted by the Senate in 1805, and remained on the bench.
No Supreme Court justice has ever been removed from office by impeachment.
🧷 Other Removal Scenarios (Extremely Rare or Theoretical)
Resignation – voluntary.
Death in office – common due to lifetime appointments.
Disability – there’s no formal procedure to remove a justice for mental or physical unfitness unless impeachment is used.
🔒 In Summary
Step Requirement Outcome
1 House majority Justice is impeached
2 Senate 2/3 vote Justice is removed
Removing a Supreme Court justice is meant to be difficult by design, to ensure judicial independence from political whims.
Seen on Twitter:
stock here: they should be able to prove all of this, and tell Hillary that if she doesn’t interfere to screw up the prosecution, she can live her natural life outside of bars, and use that to also defuse other potential actors…after first also showing them the dirt on themselves, the evidence, and the possible charges and jail terms. Combat!
🚨 JUST OUT FROM @POTUS! pic.twitter.com/UdXwr2Ml8C
— Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) July 10, 2025
stock here, never seen anything like this!
Video from Bowie, MD this evening 👀 pic.twitter.com/jvSnE3oUco
— DMV News Live (@DCNewsLive) July 9, 2025
stock here: he has credibility
I was the former physician to three presidents. Here’s the real story about Dr. Kevin O’Connor’s disgraceful appearance before Congress. pic.twitter.com/j4DMZaxfUh
— Ronny Jackson (@RonnyJacksonTX) July 10, 2025
stock here: got this in an email.
 |
| Stock, this is a longer email, but we have a big update for you.If you can’t stick around for every word, we’ll cut straight to the chase: The DNC is ramping up our work against Trump and his allies, but we can’t do it without your support. Organizing and legal battles aren’t cheap, and we count on grassroots supporters like you to power our fight to elect Democrats who will fight for working families and communities nationwide. If this work matters to you, please consider donating $3 to the DNC today >>If you’ve stored your info with ActBlue, we’ll process your contribution instantly.CONTRIBUTE $3Here are the three things you need to know right now: TRUMP’S BUDGET BILL HAS BEEN SIGNED INTO LAW This bill represents the largest transfer of wealth from the working class to the billionaire class in US history. It will cut Medicaid and food assistance (like SNAP) for millions of Americans — while handing the ultrawealthy a giant tax break. Taking back Congress will be the key to stopping more harmful legislation like this — and that work has to start now. WE’VE OFFICIALLY LAUNCHED ORGANIZING SUMMER This summer, the DNC is investing in organizers in every state — red, blue, and purple — across the country to ensure that we’re reaching as many voters as we can. Taking back Congress and electing down-ballot Democrats who will fight against Trump and his allies is our highest priority right now, and we’re excited to get folks across the country involved. WE’RE FIGHTING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IN COURT TO PROTECT OUR ELECTIONS Since Inauguration Day, the Trump administration has been trying to rewrite longstanding campaign finance laws, overturning decades of precedent. The DNC, along with the DSCC and DCCC, have filed a motion asking the Supreme Court to allow us to defend the federal election law that sets limits on coordinated party expenditures against the Republican Party’s challenge. This motion has been granted. We’re fighting like hell against the Trump administration and its allies to protect our democracy and the American people. But organizing nationwide and taking the administration to court won’t be cheap. Steven, we’re counting on your support to help us hold this administration and the Republican majority accountable. Please pitch in $3 to the DNC to help us elect Democrats up and down the ballot who will fight for the American people. |
I saw the F1 Movie last night and it was excellent in many ways. A GOAT.
stock here: She is a sleeper, like Mike Pence, “playing nice” until they are forced to play their part. And the white female justice with black adoptees (I see more and more of this, even out in the country) (Amy Coney Barrett) takes a few serious shots the the diversity hire. So what is the game here, why did they let her mouth off? They should have saved her for a more important issue that they could actually win.
And remember, this creature famously stated that she could not define what a woman is.
And normally “liberal” Justice Sonia Sotomayor, also pushes back on Ketanji (a Biden appointee, of course).
CNN selects this picture of her, for what reason? It is not flattering, she does have that wide eyed leftist lunacy look.
Conservative Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett stunned veteran bench watchers Friday with a blunt takedown of liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s “extreme” dissent in the landmark birthright citizenship case in which the Supreme Court curtailed lower court use of universal injunctions.
“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,” wrote Barrett, the court’s second-newest justice, in a jaw-dropping rebuke of her colleague, the newest justice.
“We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary
————————————-
Jackson’s stats prove she is not qualified to be on SCOTUS. Supreme Court Ketanji Brown Jackson served on the U.S. District Court for the DC from 2013-21. During that time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia overturned 11.9% of her decisions.When compared to all D.C.federal district judges for whom appeals analytics are available, Jackson’s reversal rate is
in the bottom 36.4%. When compared to all Democrat-appointed D.C. federal district judges for whom appeals analytics are available, Jackson’s reversal rate is in the bottom 30.8%. Jackson’s high reversal rate, especially before a court whose active judges tend to share her ideological
orientation (6 out 10 appointed by Dems) signals low judicial competence.
—————————-
Right after the 1 minute mark, Biden states his selection process will only include Black Women. Ketanji was an aid for Brennan who is the justice that stepped down. Maybe there was some hanky panky to get into position.
You’re absolutely right now — Justice Stephen Breyer retired in 2022, and his former law clerk, Ketanji Brown Jackson, was chosen by President Biden to replace him. This made her the first former Supreme Court clerk to serve alongside her former Justice’s colleagues.
🧓 Why Did Justice Breyer Resign?
✅ 1. Age and Tenure
Breyer was 83 years old at the time of his retirement in 2022.
He had served on the Supreme Court for 28 years (appointed by Bill Clinton in 1994).
Like Brennan, his decision was largely voluntary, citing age and the natural timing for retirement.
🕊️ 2. Political Pressure From the Left
Progressive activists and Democratic lawmakers pressured Breyer to retire while Democrats still held control of the Senate and presidency, to avoid a repeat of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg situation (who passed in 2020 under a Republican president, resulting in a conservative replacement).
Groups like Demand Justice launched campaigns urging him to retire:
“Retire Breyer” signs were seen outside the Court starting in early 2021.
🗣️ 3. His Own Words
At his formal announcement with President Biden in January 2022, Breyer said:
“I have found the work challenging and meaningful. I have great respect for my colleagues… I believe in the rule of law and the democratic system.”
He made no mention of political pressure but acknowledged a sense of duty to leave at the right time, allowing a smooth transition.
👩⚖️ Why Jackson’s Appointment Was Symbolic
Ketanji Brown Jackson clerked for Justice Breyer in 1999–2000.
Her selection was both historic (as the first Black woman on the Court) and symbolic—a “passing of the torch” from Breyer to a former mentee.
Breyer reportedly supported her nomination.
stock here: A-Eye wanted to tell me a story, it’s below the line
this seems extreme As far as i know, the actual etymology is Is – ishtar babylonian god Ra – Egyptian God El – Canaanite God ie Satan
You’re referring to a theory about the etymology of the word “Israel” that breaks it into:
This breakdown is a modern, speculative interpretation and not how linguists or biblical scholars understand the etymology. Here’s a grounded breakdown:
In Hebrew, Israel is written יִשְׂרָאֵל (Yisra’el), and its meaning is generally taken as:
“He who struggles/wrestles with God”
(from the Hebrew verb śāra = to struggle/fight + El = God)
This comes from Genesis 32:28, where Jacob wrestles with a mysterious being (interpreted as an angel or God), and is renamed Israel:
“Your name shall no longer be Jacob, but Israel, for you have striven with God and with men, and have prevailed.”
It’s understandable that these connections look compelling at a surface level (especially given how ancient religions influenced each other), but the standard scholarly view sees Israel as meaning “struggles with God”, rooted entirely in Semitic/Hebrew linguistic structure.
Let me know if you want to go deeper into the Canaanite origin of “El” or how Yahweh and El were merged in ancient Israelite religion — that’s a fascinating rabbit hole.
—————————-
you’re diving into one of the most fascinating and nuanced areas of ancient Near Eastern religion: how El, the Canaanite high god, and Yahweh, the national god of Israel, merged over time into what later Jews and Christians recognized as the singular God.
El appears in Ugaritic texts (from Ras Shamra, 14th–13th c. BCE) as head of a divine council — a theme we’ll see mirrored in early Israelite writings.
Early Israelite religion likely distinguished Yahweh and El. We see evidence of this in Genesis 14, where El Elyon (God Most High) is referenced separately from Yahweh.
But El’s titles start appearing for Yahweh:
This suggests a theological syncretism — El’s identity and attributes were being absorbed into Yahweh worship.
By the time of the monarchy (c. 1000 BCE), Yahweh fully assumes the roles previously attributed to El:
Psalm 82 is a clear example:
“God (Elohim) stands in the divine assembly; He judges among the gods (elohim).”
This is an echo of the old Canaanite divine council (El as chief god among lesser deities), but now Yahweh is in that role.
Originally, ancient Israel practiced monolatry — worship of one god (Yahweh) while acknowledging others.
But during the Babylonian Exile (6th c. BCE), a major shift happened:
At this point, El and Yahweh were fully merged not just in name but in concept — the singular God of Israel had subsumed all the roles of older regional deities.
Understanding the Yahweh-El merger:
If you want to go even deeper, we can explore:
Would you like to continue down one of those threads?
stock here: So its seems like much of the Deaths from the injection occur pretty quickly, so those are more temporarily related (by time) and therefore seem to generate more cause and affect reporting to VAERS.
https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/download/1982/1420/8245?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Great question — here’s a breakdown of the source data for the Under-Reporting Factors (URFs) used in that chart and spreadsheet. These are estimates, not official CDC figures, but they are based on peer-reviewed research and expert analysis of VAERS data.
📚 VAERS URF Source References
🔹 1. General VAERS Reporting: URF 30–100×
Source: Miller, NZ. “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Diagnoses in Children Based on Vaccination Status.”
Estimate: URF range of 30 to 100 based on analysis comparing passive VAERS data with known event rates.
Citation: IJIRMS, 2021.
Read PDF (independent research)
🔹 2. Myocarditis (COVID-19): URF ≈ 31×
Source: McCullough et al. – Analysis of post-vaccine myocarditis using VAERS plus published rates from US and Israel.
Method: Compared VAERS-reported myocarditis cases to known incidence rates from peer-reviewed publications.
Estimate: ~31× underreporting of confirmed myocarditis.
Citation: ResearchGate or Corman et al. analysis.
🔹 3. COVID-19 Deaths Post-Vaccine (URF 10× and 36×)
Source: Open comments submitted to the CDC docket #CDC-2023-0028
Submitter: Steve Kirsch and collaborators (not peer-reviewed but detailed)
Estimate:
URF 10: Deaths within 7 days of COVID-19 vaccination
URF 36: Deaths within 42 days
Method: Compared background mortality rates and vaccine rollout with VAERS-reported deaths
Citation: CDC public submission
⚠️ Disclaimers
VAERS is a passive system, and the CDC itself acknowledges under-reporting is expected.
Official estimates of URF are rarely published because it varies by event severity, awareness, and population.
These estimates should be understood as analytical extrapolations, not definitive counts.
———————————-
Here’s a clearer overview of the under-reporting factor (URF) for VAERS, with data backed by research:
📊 VAERS Under-Reporting Factor (URF)
🧪 Findings from Studies
Relative URF Estimated at 30–100×
A study reported that the relative URF for VAERS may be in the range of 30 to 100
This suggests only 1–3% of actual adverse events are reported.
Myocarditis URF = ~31×
Researchers examining COVID-19 vaccine–related myocarditis found that for 3,078 VAERS-reported cases, adjusting by a URF of ≈31× yields an estimated ~95,418 true cases
.
URF for Death Reports (COVID-19 Vaccines)
A review indicated URF ≈10× for 7-day window and ≈36× for 42-day window following COVID-19 vaccination
🔍 Summary Table
Adverse Event Type Estimated URF
General VAERS Reporting 30×–100×
COVID-19 Myocarditis ~31×
COVID-19–linked Deaths 10× (7-day); 36× (42-day)
📈 What It Means in Practice
For every report in VAERS, there could realistically be dozens more unreported cases
A 30× URF implies that only ~3% of actual adverse events are documented
📋 Notes & Cautions
URF varies by event severity: serious events are more frequently reported
Estimates rely on disparate methodologies (survey data, medical chart audits, missing link studies)
URF applies statistical adjustment for passive surveillance systems, not proof of causation
stock here: my first thought was OMG, now the death toll is 67. My second thought was weather manipulation. To punish Texas for their stance on “immigrants” aka intentional invaders.
There was no warnings about the flood. How often do we hear this now? Think I could set up a high river warning for about $1000. They reviewed the idea in 2017 but a neighboringing community spent $2,000,000 for an early warning system, which is absurd, but still cheap in relation to lives lost.
I found this view of the camp
stock here, the younger they are, the less patriotic they are.
I went back to the article and made this table, wondering why the authors would not present the data in a table. That’s plain weird. Does length of reading time somehow increase their payments?
Here’s a breakdown of the most commonly accepted generational labels in the U.S., including Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z, based on birth years and general characteristics:
📊 Generational Chart
Generation Birth Years Approx. Age in 2025 Notable Traits
Baby Boomers 1946–1964 61–79 years old Post-WWII optimism, suburban growth, retirement focus
Generation X 1965–1980 45–60 years old Independent, skeptical, grew up pre-internet
Millennials 1981–1996 29–44 years old Tech-savvy, student debt, delayed home-buying
Generation Z 1997–2012 13–28 years old Digital natives, social media fluency, global-minded
(Gen Alpha) 2013–2025 est. 0–12 years old Growing up with AI, voice assistants, and tablets
💡 Key Points:
These generational definitions are cultural, not scientific — some variation exists between sources.
Millennials and Gen Z are often lumped together in media, but they differ greatly in worldview and tech adoption.
Gen X is sometimes called the “forgotten generation” but played a big role in shaping tech and business culture.
Boomers are often associated with postwar economic expansion and are a major force in retirement and healthcare discussions today.