stock here: we should be watching the balsaltic magmas of Hawaii also. Charged Magma’s can also be set off by CMEs and especially back to back CMEs, even if not earth directed.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/yellowstone-geyser-explosion-sends-visitors-running/story?id=112211765
In the ABC news article, “scientists” explain the eruption as “water instantly turning into steam” but they assure us that it is not related to volcanic activity. How effin ridiculous is that? OF COURSE it was an incursion of hot magma, what other heat source could possibly do that. But I get it…they don’t want us to panic about the massive Yellowstone explosion that could cover the country in feet of dust….which BTW is extremely unlikely since there are 400 NAMED geothermal releases at Yellowstone.
OK let me non-beffudle these so called scientists. A-Eye helped with this, in like 3 seconds.
To analyze the correlation between hydrothermal explosions at Biscuit Basin and solar cycles or coronal mass ejections (CMEs), let’s first understand the timeline and characteristics of these events:
Hydrothermal Explosions at Biscuit Basin:
1959
1991
2009
Solar Cycles:
Solar cycles typically last about 11 years and are characterized by the waxing and waning of sunspot activity. Here is a summary of the relevant solar cycles around the explosion years:
Solar Cycle 19 (1954-1964): This cycle peaked around 1957-1958 with one of the highest recorded sunspot counts.
Solar Cycle 22 (1986-1996): This cycle peaked in 1989.
Solar Cycle 24 (2008-2019): This cycle started in December 2008 and peaked around 2013-2014.
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs):
CMEs are large expulsions of plasma and magnetic field from the sun’s corona. They can cause geomagnetic storms and impact Earth’s magnetosphere. While specific CME data for every year might not be readily available, significant CMEs are often associated with the peak periods of solar cycles.
Correlation Analysis:
1959 Hydrothermal Explosion:
Occurred during Solar Cycle 19, one of the most active cycles on record.
Peaked around 1957-1958, making 1959 a period of declining but still high solar activity.
Significant solar activity during this period could have contributed to increased geothermal activity.
1991 Hydrothermal Explosion:
Occurred during Solar Cycle 22.
The cycle peaked in 1989, so 1991 was within a period of high solar activity and potentially significant CME occurrences.
High solar activity could have influenced geothermal conditions.
2009 Hydrothermal Explosion:
Occurred at the beginning of Solar Cycle 24.
This period was characterized by a solar minimum transitioning to increasing solar activity.
Although solar activity was low in 2009, the start of a new cycle can still cause fluctuations that may impact Earth's geophysical environment.
Conclusion:
There appears to be a correlation between hydrothermal explosions at Biscuit Basin and periods of high solar activity or transitions between solar cycles. Peaks in solar activity and associated CMEs could potentially influence geothermal dynamics, possibly triggering or contributing to hydrothermal explosions. However, it is important to note that hydrothermal explosions are complex events influenced by various geological and environmental factors. Further scientific investigation would be necessary to establish a definitive causal relationship.
For more detailed information, consider reviewing scientific studies on solar cycles and geothermal activity, as well as historical data on CMEs and their impact on Earth’s magnetosphere.