Forced to Weigh In on Poor Little “Activist” (Only Lesbian, Not EVEN trans)

stock here: It seems I always have to Weigh In, with the real perspective. The original “view angle” was just fine to come to a complete conclusion. She started backing up, not sure why, flustered?

Shameful to have so much TDS that lefties just make things up.  

The shot was through the front window.  When the decision to shoot was made the SUV was pointed directly at the officer and accelerating.  I think there were at least 2 shots.

Maybe she didn't see him right away and started turning but that does not justify driving in a reckless manner with possibility of great bodily harm.  Fully justified shooting. She was also intentionally blocking the road to block ICE she knew exactly who they were.   At that point she was impeding federal officers...breaking the law and subject to arrest. 

Idiots on Facebook make ridiculous comments like "she wasn't armed"

"They shot her through the side window", therefore she was already "gone"
-------------------------------------   new info and perspective
Forward Motion, Fatal Consequences: What the Officer’s Video Really Shows

If you’re just catching up, here’s the deal: Renee Good was involved in an incident where she drove her SUV into a law enforcement officer and was fatally shot. There’s a newly released video from the officer’s perspective that shows exactly what went down—how Renee engages with the officer, how her partner engages with the officer, and the moment her partner tries to get into the SUV—but never actually gets inside before Renee accelerates and hits the officer. 

The video also captures the words and actions that aren’t being talked about, soke of them beeped and still being debated but they tell a story the mainstream isn’t highlighting.

Stop letting people tell you what they want you to see. Watch the video again. Really watch it. Because what unfolds isn’t some ambiguous “misunderstanding” or “conflicting narratives.” This wasn't twocinnocent bystanders caught in confusion. It’s a sequence of decisions and motion that tells its own story—and that story is far more uncomfortable than the prevailing spin.

Before the forward motion even begins, Renee says to the officer, “That’s fine, dude, I’m not mad at you.” Calm, confident, unbothered. That’s not surprise, not fear. Her partner steps into frame with authority, saying, “We don’t change our license plate every other day. When we come back, it’ll still be the same one.” Commanding, confrontational, deliberate. Neutral bystanders don’t behave like that. These women knew what was happening, had a read on the situation, were actively involved and weren’t shy about asserting it.

The video captures more than just motion—it shows attitude, intent, and presence. Her partner’s words and posture are assertive and confrontational, but context matters. According to Rebecca Good, she “made her come down here. It’s my fault,” and she described their presence as supporting neighbors, adding, “We had whistles. They had guns.” These statements make it clear: they knew exactly why they were in the neighborhood. They were participants in the situation, not innocent bystanders, actively engaging in the encounter that would follow.

Renee’s partner is reaching for the door to possibly get into the SUV—hand on the handle. And then? Renee accelerates forward before her partner even gets inside. Forward motion continues directly into the officer, making contact. That moment is undeniable: Renee did not wait, she did not hesitate, and she actively endangered the person closest to her.

The SUV strikes the officer. Wheels pointed straight ahead, no evasive adjustments, no pause. This is a decision with immediate, real-world consequences.

Minnesota law now explicitly defines when officers are justified in using deadly force. Under Minn. Stat. § 609.066, deadly force is only justified when an objectively reasonable officer would believe it’s necessary to protect life or prevent great bodily harm, based on what the officer knew at the time. This includes situations where a person is using a vehicle as a weapon. These standards were clarified and updated under Governor Tim Walz as part of broader police accountability reforms, emphasizing an objective standard rather than subjective judgment.

The video shows intentional forward motion, contact with an officer, and complete disregard for the safety of both the officer and her own partner. Combined with calm, assertive language and confrontational body language, it paints a picture of reckless decision-making and situational awareness used to dangerous effect. 

Stop letting anyone tell you what you saw. Watch the frames, listen to the words, and read the actions. The story is clear—and it’s far from neutral.