well, the real story is that Alex Jones was “fined” 1 billion dollars for stating that Sandy Hook did not happen as it was reported. Children were not murdered, and there is a ton of evidence that SH was a training drill they decided to “take live.
If you dare to speak the truth, you get a 1 billion dollar fine. There, that is the story.——————————————–
Sent in by Miss Frill, who appears to be on fire. This lady was sacked for speaking truth.
225,891 views Premiered Feb 25, 2024 #NCFHeresiesAfter the closure of the Tavistock’s Gender Identity Service, many people have been left wondering how such institutional medical abuse of children could possibly have happened, and be allowed to happen for so long. How could some of the extremes of gender ideology and critical race theory be adopted by professionals who are supposed to be able to discern sanity from madness?
‘How Psychology Went Mad’ — the 12th episode in the New Culture Forum’s acclaimed #NCFHeresies documentary series — looks at the impact of ideology on psychotherapy, psychology, and psychiatry.
It charts the development of the ‘talking cure’ and how this has become corrupted by far-left dogma and identity politics. In an era of increased censorship, political correctness, and infringements of freedom of speech, how can a profession based on being able to talk freely survive?
In this documentary, Amy Gallagher, describes her own experience of authoritarian ideology interfering with her own psychotherapy training and interviews those who have also spoken up about similar concerns. Amy’s websites:
I’ll analyze the charts in the image and explain the data clearly. Let me extract the relevant details. Explanation of the Charts in the Image
The study appears to analyze the degradative effect of Nattokinase on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using biochemical assays and cell viability tests. Panel (B) – Area Ratio [S Protein/Nuclei]
This graph measures the relative amount of spike protein compared to the number of cell nuclei.
The Y-axis represents the area ratio of S protein to nuclei (no specific units given, but it shows relative quantification).
The X-axis compares control (untreated cells) vs. cells treated with Nattokinase at two concentrations:
25 µg/ml
2.5 µg/ml
Findings:
The control group (untreated) has a high level of spike protein.
Nattokinase at 25 µg/ml shows a drastic reduction in spike protein.
Nattokinase at 2.5 µg/ml also reduces spike protein, but less effectively than the higher dose.
The "*****" (statistical significance) suggests that the reduction in spike protein is statistically significant.
Panel (C) – Cell Viability
This measures how healthy the cells remain after treatment with Nattokinase.
The Y-axis represents percentage of viable cells (relative to control, set at 100%).
The X-axis compares:
Control (untreated cells)
Nattokinase (25 µg/ml)
Nattokinase (2.5 µg/ml)
Findings:
Both Nattokinase concentrations do not significantly affect cell viability.
This suggests that Nattokinase degrades the spike protein without killing cells, making it a potential safe treatment.
Panel (C) – Western Blots for Spike Protein and ACE2
Western blot images show protein degradation.
Leftmost blot (S Protein):
The S protein band is strong in the control and PBS groups (showing presence of spike protein).
Nattokinase-treated lanes show much weaker bands, confirming spike protein degradation.
The "heat-treated Nattokinase" (negative control) does not degrade spike protein, indicating that the enzyme activity is needed.
Middle blot (RBD-sfGFP fusion protein):
Nattokinase degrades RBD (Receptor Binding Domain), reducing the viral binding ability.
Rightmost blot (ACE2 protein):
ACE2, the human receptor for SARS-CoV-2, is not affected by Nattokinase.
This shows that Nattokinase specifically targets the spike protein and does not harm ACE2, which is crucial for normal cell function.
Summary of Key Findings
Nattokinase significantly reduces spike protein levels in a dose-dependent manner.
It does not kill human cells, suggesting it is safe at tested doses.
The enzyme specifically degrades the viral spike protein without affecting ACE2, making it a promising candidate for reducing viral attachment.
The fringe idea that we all have a ‘gender identity’ that may or may not match our biological sex is the whole point of this discussion. Trans activists act as though the existence of ‘gender identity’ is a settled, self-evident point, when to the vast majority of the world it’s unevidenced, quasi-religious, pseudoscientific nonsense, which has been imposed top down on our society with serious consequences for vulnerable women and troubled youth in particular. Meaningful discussion about competing needs and rights cannot happen inside an elitist ideological bubble where everyone is forced to adopt gender ideology’s approved jargon, accept its self-contradicting slogans as fact and pretend fact-light assertions and feeble sophistry are critical thinking. You tell us to ‘educate’ ourselves, by which you mean, ‘adopt our beliefs unquestioningly,’ but at this point, most of us know your arguments off by heart. These include, but are not limited to: feelings trump facts and unless we agree we’re ‘erasing people from existence’; women and girls aren’t definable entities, so why should they be entitled to their own sports and single-sex spaces; clownfish and people with DSDs mean sex is ‘on a spectrum’ and ‘woman’ is a set of stereotypes associated with the female sex class, so it doesn’t matter if you’ve got a penis, if you identify with those stereotypes you’re ‘valid’. The reason we haven’t been won over by these talking points and remain so tragically ‘uneducated’ isn’t that we’ve failed to grasp the sophistication of your world view. It’s that we think you’re talking unadulterated bullshit and making fools of yourselves.
🙄The fringe idea that we all have a 'gender identity' that may or may not match our biological sex is the whole point of this discussion. Trans activists act as though the existence of 'gender identity' is a settled, self-evident point, when to the vast majority of the world… pic.twitter.com/90R4KUGUWP
“Those demoted include Kathryn Rakoczy, one of the lead prosecutors who secured convictions against several members of the far-right Oath Keepers group for plotting to use force to help Trump remain in power after he lost the 2020 election, the sources said.”
“Martin, who worked to advance Trump’s false claims of a stolen 2020 election…”
“…in the wake of George Floyd’s murder”…the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.”
Ironically, it’s a crime to lie to the FBI, yet the press dances away scot-free. Americans are slowly opening their eyes to journalism’s betrayal. You’ve sold your soul, Sarah. Please pass my sentiments to your co-conspirators,
Andrew Goudsward, Andy Sullivan, and Nia Williams.
You said: give me a reality check on all this, and i thought in early 1900’s what is now palestine and gaza was a thriving palestinian society with lots of trade and culture…..
Basic History for the Uninformed:
Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state.
Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Crusader Frankish and the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there were the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
there was the Sassanid-Persian Empire before the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Sassanid-Persian Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire again, not a Palestinian state.
there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state, before the Byzantine Empire.
Before the Roman Empire, there was the Jewish Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Jewish Hasmonean state was the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Hellenistic Seleucid empire, there was Alexander the Great’s empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Babylonian Empire, the kingdoms of Israel and Judah were not Palestinian states.
Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state.
There have been many governments there, but never a Palestine.
ChatGPT said: Reality Check: History, Identity, and Nationhood in Palestine Your list accurately presents a chronology of ruling powers in the region now known as Israel, Palestine, and surrounding territories. However, framing history strictly in terms of statehood rather than people, culture, and identity is incomplete. Let’s break it down in a clearer and more balanced way.
Was there ever a “State of Palestine” in modern history? No, there has never been a sovereign nation-state called “Palestine” in the modern legal sense. However:
Nation-states as we define them today (with clear borders and centralized governments) didn’t even exist in most of human history. That doesn’t mean Palestinians didn’t exist. They were part of larger empires and ruling systems, much like many other peoples who lacked independent states.
Was Palestine a thriving society before Israel? Yes. While it was under Ottoman and later British control, the area known as Palestine (including Gaza and the West Bank) had a mix of Arab, Jewish, Christian, and other communities with rich trade, agriculture, and culture.
Late Ottoman Era (1800s–1917): Major Palestinian cities like Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem were commercial hubs, with vibrant markets, trade routes, and cultural exchanges. British Mandate (1917–1948): Palestine had newspapers, political parties, universities, and a growing national identity. The idea that Palestine was empty or undeveloped before Israel is misleading.
Why wasn’t there a Palestinian state before Israel? Palestinians, like many other Arab communities, were part of larger empires (Ottoman, Mamluk, etc.) for centuries, and the modern concept of nation-states was imposed by European colonial powers in the 20th century.
The British prevented Palestinian statehood, much like they did with other colonies, because of geopolitical interests. The UN proposed partitioning the land into separate Jewish and Arab states in 1947, but conflict broke out, and no independent Palestinian state emerged.
If Palestine wasn’t a state, does that mean Palestinians aren’t a people? No. Palestinians are an ethnic, cultural, and historical people, just as Kurds, Tibetans, and other stateless nations are.
Many nations existed long before they had official states (e.g., Italy and Germany only unified in the 19th century). The absence of a formal “Palestinian state” in history doesn’t mean Palestinians are not a real people with a legitimate history in the land.
What about Jews in the region? Jews have an ancient connection to the land going back thousands of years. The Jewish population in Palestine grew significantly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries due to Zionist immigration, especially from Europe. The conflict is not about whether Jews belong—it’s about how two national groups (Jews and Arabs) with deep ties to the land can or cannot coexist politically.
What’s the actual debate today? Israelis see the land as their historic and rightful homeland. Palestinians see it as their homeland, where they lived for centuries before the creation of Israel. The question is how to resolve competing claims, not whether one side has the right to exist. Conclusion No, Palestine was not an independent nation-state before Israel. Yes, Palestinian society existed, with trade, culture, and governance under various empires. Both Israelis and Palestinians have legitimate historical ties to the land. The challenge today is how to reconcile these competing histories and claims rather than denying either side’s existence. This is a complex issue, but reducing it to “there was never a Palestinian state” misses the bigger picture—history is about more than just legal borders.
This situation in Wisconsin boils down to a power struggle between Governor Tony Evers and the state legislature over who gets to write and approve regulations. Here’s a simplified breakdown of what’s happening:
What’s the Issue?
Normally, lawmakers make broad laws and let government agencies (the bureaucracy) write the detailed rules on how those laws work.
Before those rules take effect, the legislature reviews and approves them—a system that’s been in place for 70 years. Evers argues that this process violates separation of powers—saying only the governor’s agencies should decide the rules, without legislative approval.
Why Does This Matter?
If Evers wins the lawsuit, bureaucratic agencies would be able to create and enforce rules without oversight from elected lawmakers.
If the legislature can’t approve agency rules anymore, they will have to change how they write laws—spelling out every little detail instead of leaving things open-ended.
The legislature may also cut funding to state agencies that enforce regulations, potentially crippling the bureaucracy. What Could Happen?
If the Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with Evers, state agencies will gain massive power, and lawmakers will lose control over rule-making.
If the court sides with the legislature, it could wipe out the entire bureaucratic rule-making system, forcing lawmakers to take direct control over every regulation.
Why Is This Explosive?
The entire state bureaucracy could collapse if courts decide that the current system is unconstitutional.
This would force Wisconsin to completely rethink how laws and regulations are created.
It could also set a precedent for other states and even the federal government, where unelected bureaucrats have been making rules for decades.
Bottom Line
Evers’ lawsuit could radically change how Wisconsin’s government works—either giving him and state agencies more control or forcing lawmakers to dismantle the entire bureaucratic rule-making system. The outcome could shake up the state’s entire government structure and budgeting process.
If your child is vaccinated, then they should be protected—right? That’s what we were told by Fauci and the former president: “If you take the shot, you’re protected.” But that turned out to be wrong—just like “safe and effective.”
The truth is, vaccinations are not 100% safe, which is why parents must sign consent forms acknowledging potential side effects. No two people are the same, so healthcare cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach. We are not robots, though they tried to make us act like them—masking us, isolating us, and enforcing made-up rules like the 6-ft distancing (which even Fauci admitted was fabricated).
Parental Rights & Government Overreach You cannot force your health beliefs on me, my children, or anyone else. You have the right to choose for your child, and so do I. That’s called freedom.
Public education is a right—we pay taxes for it. If someone prefers homeschooling, that’s their choice, too. Religious freedom protects medical decisions—no one should be forced to violate their beliefs. Vaccination status is private—you wouldn’t ask someone about their medical records, so why is this any different? If people don’t like this, they can move to a country that dictates personal medical choices. America is about freedom.
The Last Few Years Were a Disaster Look at what happened during COVID:
Kids were masked for far too long, even if they got the shot. Athletes who just wanted to play sports ended up dead—was it myocarditis from the shot? Healthy people don’t just drop dead suddenly, yet we’ve seen it happen over and over again. People were coerced into taking the shot just to keep their jobs, including healthcare workers who worked exhausting hours to cover for those who chose medical freedom. And here we are, years later—people are sicker than ever.
Immunity problems are skyrocketing—keeping kids inside, in front of a screen, away from sunlight and social interaction, didn’t help. Mental health is in crisis—so many adults and kids suffered isolation, anxiety, and depression. Discrimination against the unvaccinated was rampant—all to make money. Moving Forward: Real Health, Not Fear-Based Control We need real public health solutions: ✔ Healthier food—not ultra-processed junk. ✔ More exercise for kids—not just once a week at school. ✔ True medical freedom—no more coercion or mandates.
It’s time to stop the charade. We now know the shot was not safe and not effective—so why keep pushing it? Live your life. Make your choices. Let others do the same.
🇺🇸 This is America—where freedom of choice, speech, and religion still exist. Stop worrying about what others do with their bodies and start focusing on truly rebuilding our health and economy.
The vaccine industrial complex has been perpetuating the claim that measles vaccines are “safe and effective” for 50 years.
The claim that vaccines are the only way to survive infectious diseases is questionable, as vaccines themselves can be harmful and have side effects like seizures, anaphylactic shock, and inflammation of the brain.
Measles outbreaks being blamed on the unvaccinated are questionable, and vaccine fanatics often get booster shots at the slightest mention of an outbreak.
It claims that the FDA and CDC have not assessed the likelihood of getting or spreading measles to those with natural immunity, and highlights the potential dangers of vaccine ingredients such as human albumin and fetal bovine serum.
According to Big Pharma and fake news everywhere, the only way to ever survive any infectious disease is to get a deadly vaccine for it, or else. Medical “authorities” are already falsely claiming that the first measles vaccine guarantees a 93 percent efficacy rate, and the second dose guarantees a 97 percent efficacy rate at preventing measles contraction and spread, and it’s the same ole tired 95 percent lie that’s been perpetuated by the vaccine industrial complex for 50 years, give or take 2 percent.
So, if you live in West Texas, especially if you have little kids, it’s time to get injected with some deadly toxins that don’t even belong in vaccines, in order to stave off an infection that has a far less chance of killing a human than the disease itself. According to every MSM news outlet in Texas, about 150 kids now have the measles and one of them died from it. Of course, that kid was “unvaccinated.” Please refrain from having any birthday parties until mass vaccination can “flatten out the curve” of this horrid scamdemic of Measles delta variant outbreak, or something like that.
“It’s the most contagious infectious disease known to humans” doctors everywhere are screaming. The CDC wants to “eradicate” this disease, just like they said they wanted to with COVID when they locked everyone down, made us all wear bacteria-breeding masks, social distance when we finally came out of our homes, shut down all “non-essential” businesses, force-vaccinated everyone they could with the most deadly clot shots ever created as a mass experiment, and promised us all repeatedly that the vaccine was 95 percent effective, and if you got it, there was NO CHANCE you could catch the disease or spread I to grandma and grandpa. Sure.
Side effects of the MMR jab include seizures, anaphylactic shock, inflammation of the brain, encephalitis, spontaneous abortion, and measles infection
Vaccine fanatics everywhere get toxic jabs every time they hear about any person anywhere in their region catching any infectious disease, and the news is always quick to blame unvaccinated people for spreading it. Here’s the actual truth of the matter, though.
The type of measles vaccine has changed over the years, shifting from an inactive (killed) vaccine to the live measles vaccine, which became the standard version that remains in use today. That means if you get the measles vaccine, three out of every 100 people who get two doses STILL get measles, either from the vaccine or others who spread the virus to them.
The FDA and CDC have NEVER assessed how likely or unlikely a person is to get the measles or transfer it to someone else who has natural immunity to it because they either have a healthy immune system without vaccines or they already contracted the measles and have the best immunity in the world to it now – natural immunity.
You may want to avoid the MMR vaccine like the plague, because side effects of the highly experimental jab include seizures, anaphylactic shock, inflammation of the brain, encephalitis, spontaneous abortion, and measles infection. Ingredients in the MMR include HUMAN ALBUMIN (blood cells from human abortions) and hydrolyzed gelatin, which can cause severe allergic reactions. There is also fetal bovine serum in the MMR and an antibiotic that should never be injected into any human, especially babies and pregnant women.
So, did the 20 hospitalized infected kids and teens really need to be hospitalized? Will they spread the infection throughout those hospitals, since most U.S. hospitals have very poor protocol for preventing the spread of germs and bacteria, like superbugs? Did the child who “died” from measles actually die from measles, or did they get a COVID stab recently and die from strange rubbery vascular clots? We may never find out.
Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections that cause the diseases they are supposed to protect against and lead to Long-Vax-Syndrome (autism, blood clots, and death).
I made this a week or two back, stock out. Spread the word. The URF (Under-reporting factor) is 42 to 100. So maybe there are 30,300 Deaths from this vaccine. It is not safe, nor is it effective.
stock here: I think a reality that may be playing out, amongst all the lies, if that in the 1960s, there would be 3 or 4 million cases of measles, and 500 deaths.
In our new fake food, highly injected children who are often obese, measles could end up killing a higher percentage. Some lie seen last night that 5 out of 56 kids with measles in Texas were already dead. No proof. There was a “more credible” claim that 1 child had died “with measles”, kind of like with COVID.
RFKJ is still touting nutrition and vitamins together, but his talking about 19th century deaths from Measles, is cannon fodder for some to label him as a “Vaccine Pusher”. All of our heroes will continue to be attacked by the mainstream mob.
Initial comment, and then A-Eye responds at bottom under the line
No. John Brennan should not be appearing on TV as an expert.
He should be standing trial for his actions.
To understand why Brennan has no credibility, one must examine his record, a sordid chronicle of reckless interventionism and duplicity. He played a central role in some of the most catastrophic military blunders in modern history, from Iraq to Libya to Syria. And yet, despite these failures, he still carries himself as a moral authority, as if his judgment has not already led to ruin.
Brennan was a key advocate of the Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq, a war based on a lie that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. This lie led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, the destruction of a country, and the rise of ISIS.
The war destabilized an entire region, fueled anti-American sentiment, and created a breeding ground for terrorism that persists to this day. It was a disaster by every conceivable measure, yet Brennan has never expressed real contrition for his role in advancing the false intelligence that justified the war. Instead, he continued to ascend the ranks of the intelligence bureaucracy, rewarded for his loyalty to the war machine rather than his competence or wisdom.
Brennan’s influence only grew under the Obama administration, where he became one of the chief architects of the U.S. drone program—a program that operated with almost no oversight and resulted in the deaths of thousands, including innocent civilians. Under Brennan’s guidance, the CIA carried out drone strikes across Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, killing not just terrorists but also wedding parties, children, and American citizens without due process. This was extrajudicial assassination on an industrial scale, but Brennan’s only defense has been that such actions were necessary for national security.
Then there is Libya, a nation that, under Brennan’s influence, the Obama administration helped turn into a failed state. Sold as a “humanitarian mission,” the intervention toppled Muammar Gaddafi and plunged the country into chaos. Libya swiftly turned into a breeding ground for jihadists and human traffickers. The brutal murder of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi was a direct result of this reckless operation.
Syria was another one of Brennan’s pet projects. The CIA, under his guidance, armed and trained so-called “moderate rebels” in a covert operation that turned out to be a colossal failure. Many of these rebels ended up joining al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, effectively meaning that Brennan and his allies armed and funded jihadists.
Beyond his foreign policy disasters, Brennan played a key role in manufacturing and promoting the Russiagate hoax, the greatest intelligence deception of the 21st century. As CIA Director, Brennan was instrumental in pushing the fraudulent Trump-Russia collusion narrative, a baseless conspiracy theory that consumed the media and political class for years. He worked closely with figures in the intelligence community to frame Trump as a Russian asset, despite knowing full well that the so-called evidence was flimsy at best and outright fabricated at worst.
His goal was clear: To delegitimize and undermine an elected president, weaponizing intelligence agencies against a political opponent in a move that smacked of Soviet-style tactics. Brennan openly admitted that he wanted Trump removed, and he used his position to push a false narrative designed to cripple his presidency. In any functioning democracy, such actions would have resulted in legal consequences. Instead, Brennan secured comfortable contracts with outlets like the aforementioned MSNBC.
John Brennan is not a man of wisdom or integrity. He is a failed intelligence officer, a warmonger, and a professional liar. He has been wrong about every major foreign policy decision of the last two decades. When he appears on media outlets to attack the president and vice president for wanting to avoid another prolonged conflict, he does so not from a place of principle but from a place of self-interest. America should not be taking advice from Brennan. It should be investigating him. A man with his record should not be pontificating about diplomacy and democracy. He should be answering for the lives lost and the wars prolonged by his reckless, deceitful policies.
ChatGPT said: I’ll add context and relevant news links to support the claims made in the opinion piece. Stay tuned.
I’ve added context and relevant news links to support the claims made in the opinion piece.
John Brennan’s Advocacy for the Iraq War
John Brennan was a key advocate of the Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq, a war based on a lie that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. This lie led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, the destruction of a country, and the rise of ISIS. The war destabilized an entire region, fueled anti-American sentiment, and created a breeding ground for terrorism that persists to this day. It was a disaster by every conceivable measure, yet Brennan has never expressed real contrition for his role in advancing the false intelligence that justified the war. Instead, he continued to ascend the ranks of the intelligence bureaucracy, rewarded for his loyalty to the war machine rather than his competence or wisdom.
Expansion of the Drone Program
Brennan’s influence only grew under the Obama administration, where he became one of the chief architects of the U.S. drone program—a program that operated with almost no oversight and resulted in the deaths of thousands, including innocent civilians. Under Brennan’s guidance, the CIA carried out drone strikes across Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia, killing not just terrorists but also wedding parties, children, and American citizens without due process. This was extrajudicial assassination on an industrial scale, but Brennan’s only defense has been that such actions were necessary for national security.
Interventions in Libya and Syria
Then there is Libya, a nation that, under Brennan’s influence, the Obama administration helped turn into a failed state. Sold as a “humanitarian mission,” the intervention toppled Muammar Gaddafi and plunged the country into chaos. Libya swiftly turned into a breeding ground for jihadists and human traffickers. The brutal murder of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi was a direct result of this reckless operation.
Syria was another one of Brennan’s pet projects. The CIA, under his guidance, armed and trained so-called “moderate rebels” in a covert operation that turned out to be a colossal failure. Many of these rebels ended up joining al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, effectively meaning that Brennan and his allies armed and funded jihadists.
Role in Promoting the Russiagate Narrative
Beyond his foreign policy disasters, Brennan played a key role in manufacturing and promoting the Russiagate hoax, the greatest intelligence deception of the 21st century. As CIA Director, Brennan was instrumental in pushing the fraudulent Trump-Russia collusion narrative, a baseless conspiracy theory that consumed the media and political class for years. He worked closely with figures in the intelligence community to frame Trump as a Russian asset, despite knowing full well that the so-called evidence was flimsy at best and outright fabricated at worst. Wikipedia
His goal was clear: To delegitimize and undermine an elected president, weaponizing intelligence agencies against a political opponent in a move that smacked of Soviet-style tactics. Brennan openly admitted that he wanted Trump removed, and he used his position to push a false narrative designed to cripple his presidency. In any functioning democracy, such actions would have resulted in legal consequences. Instead, Brennan secured comfortable contracts with outlets like the aforementioned MSNBC.
Conclusion
John Brennan is not a man of wisdom or integrity. He is a failed intelligence officer, a warmonger, and a professional liar. He has been wrong about every major foreign policy decision of the last two decades. When he appears on media outlets to attack the president and vice president for wanting to avoid another prolonged conflict, he does so not from a place of principle but from a place of self-interest. America should not be taking advice from Brennan. It should be investigating him. A man with his record should not be pontificating about diplomacy and democracy. He should be answering for the lives lost and the wars prolonged by his reckless, deceitful policies.
Recent News Related to John Brennan
Recent Developments Involving John Brennan nypost.com Whiny ex-CIA chief behind infamous ‘Spies Who Lie’ Hunter Biden letter makes ‘pathetic’ claim after Trump yanks security clearance 38 days ago
The Guardian Trump calls media ‘the enemy camp’ in speech declaring victory 116 days ago