This is so serious, the lefties lose it, because Gaetz reportedly had sex with a human female. This is just effing crazy!!! What is he thinking. Why the hell wouldn’t he have sex with a gay tranvestite who does drag shows….now that would be the leftist way to be inclusive. I don’t particularly like Gaetz, he looks weird. But this may be a 5D chess way for Trump to distract “them” whilst more important things are going on.
And Bobby Kennedy thinks that grown human females are attractive and wants to have sex with them. How absurd and insulting is that. Totally exclusive.
This: Trump’s pick for defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, was accused of sexual assault. But no charges were filed. All the information is second hand (not admissible), and the supposed lady lost track of time during that whole night, for like 8 hours. Non-credible bullshit.
Shameful, they are self-imploding. Never stop your enemy whilst they are in the midst of destroying themselves.
Here’s my women’s bathroom proposal: Instead of making a trans bathroom, we should make a Republican women’s bathroom and a Democrat women’s bathroom, so all the Democrat women who agree with men using the women’s bathroom can share their bathroom with the mentally ill trans biological men that they support. But NO biological men, no matter what level of dress up they play, are allowed in the Republican women’s bathroom.
stock here: lets scale up the 40% USA food supply to be Organic.
Post a comment
https://talk.zerohedge.com
5000 characters remaining
Commenting as eagleQ.
18 minutes ago
Dozens of vaccines from birth till childhood.
Petrochemical sourced medicines.
GMO food plants and medicated animals.
Chemical farming.
Highly processed food with a plethora of chemical additives.
Chemicals in the water.
Air pollution from industry.
Most “work” involves sitting in front of a PC.
Tell me again how we are all supposed to be healthy again…? We are all just killing ourselves slowly in the name of convenience, progress and technology
stock here: I think we can easily get rid of 50% of this “work force” and as painful as it will be for them to actually work, it will show that we do not need illegal immigrants to fill OUR jobs.
FBI – Alleged political targeting and surveillance abuse. Corrupt Quote: “Our investigations are free of political bias.”
Department of Justice (DOJ) – Accusations of selective justice. “The law is applied equally to everyone.”
CIA – Suspected of influencing political narratives. “We do not engage in domestic politics.”
IRS – Known for targeting conservative groups. “We treat all taxpayers without prejudice.”
CDC – Inconsistent guidelines during the pandemic. “Trust the science.”
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Alleged overreach in domestic surveillance. “We protect freedom while respecting privacy.”
NSA – Mass surveillance concerns. “We collect only what’s necessary for security.”
Department of State – Accused of undermining Trump’s foreign policy. “Our diplomacy is above party politics.”
Department of Education – To be dismantled for fostering division and indoctrination, and rebuilt to focus on education fundamentals. “Education is about equity, not indoctrination.”
Department of Energy – To be disbanded and reconstructed at 10-20% of its size, focusing on energy independence and security, not green mandates. “Our policies ensure environmental and energy balance.”
It’s time to rebuild from the ground up, ensuring these agencies serve the American people and uphold the Constitution, not attack Trump, his administration, or his supporters.
stock here, saw this at POAL, with title of “least Jewish” appointments. Remember that in the Biden Globalist Party, almost all the appoints were Jewish. When you need to do shitty dastardly things, appoint Jews, just like Stalin did. It really is that simple. This is not in any way saying that all Jews are bad, in fact I have quite the blood quantum of true Jew (not just crypto Jew by family), and also quite Aryan, so there is all that to unpack. AI research.
Pete Hegseth – Secretary of Defense
Pete Hegseth, a 44-year-old Minnesota native, is a decorated Army National Guard veteran with service in Iraq and Afghanistan. He graduated from Princeton University with a Bachelor’s in Politics and earned a Master of Public Policy from Harvard University. Known for his advocacy for veterans and conservative values, he is a frequent commentator on Fox News. Hegseth has long supported a strong military presence and aligns with hawkish views, particularly regarding U.S. engagement in the Middle East. While not prominently identified as a Zionist, he has expressed support for Israel. Pete is a dog lover, often sharing stories about his Labrador retriever, Liberty.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a 70-year-old environmental attorney and activist from Massachusetts, is part of the famous Kennedy family. He earned his Bachelor’s degree from Harvard University and later attended the University of Virginia School of Law. Known for his work in environmental law and advocacy against corporate pollution, his views are generally anti-war, focusing on diplomacy and global health initiatives. Kennedy has not taken a strong stance on Zionism. He is an animal lover and has several dogs, often discussing their role in his family life.
Marco Rubio – Secretary of State
Marco Rubio, 53, is a Republican Senator from Florida with Cuban-American roots. Born in Miami, he graduated with a Bachelor’s in Political Science from the University of Florida and earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Miami School of Law. Rubio is a strong proponent of U.S. global leadership, advocating for interventionist policies in regions like the Middle East and Eastern Europe, making him a hawk on foreign policy. He is an outspoken Zionist, strongly supporting Israel as a key ally in the region. Rubio enjoys spending time with his family and their two golden retrievers.
Matt Gaetz – Attorney General
Matt Gaetz, a 42-year-old congressman from Florida, has a background in law and politics. He graduated from Florida State University with a Bachelor’s in Interdisciplinary Sciences and earned his Juris Doctor from William & Mary Law School. Known for his populist views, he opposes prolonged foreign interventions, aligning with an anti-war stance. Gaetz has shown consistent support for Israel but does not appear to align strongly with Zionist ideologies. A dog enthusiast, he frequently shares photos of his bulldog, Diesel, on social media.
Doug Collins – Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Doug Collins, 58, hails from Georgia and is a former congressman and pastor. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of North Georgia and a Juris Doctor from Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School. A U.S. Air Force Reserve chaplain, Collins has a history of supporting veterans and military families but does not have a strong public stance on foreign interventions or Zionism. He is known to love dogs and has adopted several rescue dogs over the years.
Kristi Noem – Secretary of Homeland Security
Kristi Noem, 52, is the governor of South Dakota, where she was born and raised. She attended Northern State University and is widely known for her focus on border security and domestic issues. While Noem supports a strong defense, she does not have significant public positions on foreign interventions or Zionist ideologies. She is an avid dog owner, often seen on her ranch with her cattle dog, Dakota. Susie Wiles – Chief of Staff
Susie Wiles, in her early 60s, is a political strategist from Florida with decades of experience in campaign management. She attended college in Florida, though her specific alma mater is not widely publicized. Known for her role in managing successful campaigns, including those of Trump, her public stance on foreign interventions or Zionism is minimal. Susie likes dogs and has often mentioned her family’s dachshund as a companion during stressful campaign seasons.
Tulsi Gabbard – Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard, 43, is a former congresswoman from Hawaii with a long history of military service as a member of the Hawaii Army National Guard. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Hawaii Pacific University. Gabbard is staunchly anti-war, having criticized U.S. interventions in Iraq and Syria, and prioritizes diplomacy. She supports Israel’s right to self-defense but is not identified as a Zionist. Gabbard adores dogs, often sharing photos with her two rescue dogs, Bella and Kona.
Elise Stefanik – Ambassador to the United Nations
Elise Stefanik, 40, is a congresswoman from New York with a degree in Government from Harvard University. Known for her hawkish foreign policy views, she has strongly advocated for U.S. involvement in countering global adversaries, particularly in the Middle East and Russia. A vocal supporter of Israel, Stefanik aligns closely with Zionist perspectives. She is a dog lover and has a Labrador retriever named Reagan.
Lee Zeldin – Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Lee Zeldin, 44, is a former congressman from New York with a Bachelor’s in Political Science from SUNY Albany and a Juris Doctor from Albany Law School. He served in the U.S. Army and has a history of supporting U.S. military interventions. Zeldin is a strong Zionist, consistently advocating for Israel’s security and sovereignty. He has a family dog named Max, whom he frequently mentions in interviews.
John Ratcliffe – Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
John Ratcliffe, 58, is a former congressman from Texas and served as the Director of National Intelligence. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Government and International Studies from the University of Notre Dame and a Juris Doctor from Southern Methodist University. Ratcliffe has advocated for a strong national defense but does not have a significant public record on U.S. military interventions or Zionism. He enjoys outdoor activities, including spending time with his Labrador retriever, Ranger.
Michael Waltz – National Security Adviser
Michael Waltz, 49, is a congressman from Florida and a former Green Beret. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in International Relations from Virginia Military Institute. Waltz has been a vocal advocate for maintaining U.S. military strength and presence abroad, particularly in Afghanistan, making him a “war hawk.” He supports Israel but is not prominently identified as a Zionist. Waltz loves dogs and frequently mentions his German Shepherd, Trooper, in interviews.
Doug Burgum – Secretary of the Interior
Doug Burgum, 68, is the governor of North Dakota and a former technology entrepreneur. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from North Dakota State University and an MBA from Stanford University. His focus has been on domestic energy and land management issues, with no major public stance on military interventions or Zionism. Burgum is known for his love of animals and owns two rescue dogs, Bison and Prairie.
Karoline Leavitt – Press Secretary
Karoline Leavitt, 27, is a young political communications specialist from New Hampshire. She graduated from Saint Anselm College with a degree in Communications and Political Science. With her primary focus on media and public relations, she has not publicly addressed military interventions or Zionist positions. Leavitt has a golden retriever named Sunny and has shared how much she values dogs for their companionship.
Kash Patel – Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Kash Patel, 41, is a former national security official and lawyer from New York. He earned his Bachelor’s degree from the University of Richmond and a Juris Doctor from Pace University. Patel has worked extensively in counterterrorism and intelligence, supporting strong U.S. defense measures but with no clear hawkish stance on interventions. While supportive of Israel, he is not considered a Zionist. Patel loves dogs and has a beagle named Maverick.
J.D. Vance – Vice President
J.D. Vance, 40, is a Senator from Ohio and author of the bestselling book Hillbilly Elegy. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science and Philosophy from Ohio State University and a Juris Doctor from Yale Law School. Vance has expressed skepticism about foreign military interventions, aligning him with anti-war views. He supports Israel but is not prominently aligned with Zionist ideologies. Vance enjoys spending time outdoors with his two dogs, Scout and Clover.
Vance Cheung – Communications Director
Vance Cheung, 35, is a communications strategist from California. He earned his Bachelor’s degree in Media Studies from UCLA. With a background in media and political communications, Cheung has not made public statements on military interventions or Zionism. He is a dog lover and often shares photos of his Shih Tzu, Mochi, on social media.
John Thune – Senate Majority Leader
John Thune, 63, is a senator from South Dakota with a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Biola University. A supporter of U.S. military interventions, Thune aligns with hawkish policies and has consistently supported Israel, making him a strong proponent of Zionist perspectives. He enjoys spending time with his family and their Australian Shepherd, Dakota.
On Friday, the state health department confirmed Hawaii’s first discovery of avian flu in Central Oahu detected in a backyard flock of birds. Health officials say the virus detected here matches the strain that has infected domestic poultry and dairy cows on the U.S. continent.
“We were devastated. My heart dropped and to be honest, I couldn’t process it. It didn’t seem real and just immediate panic set in,” said Rocio Tapia, Aloha Animal Sanctuary, executive director.
A Waialua egg farmer has similar fears. Workers are starting to spray vehicle tires while banning visitors.
“I’m scared to death,” said Michael Sencer, co-owner Waialua Egg Farm.
He has more than 300,000 birds and roughly 70 employees.
“I’d hate to see it hit us and we lose everything,” he added.
When the hypnosis wears off, policymakers, managers, and supervisors will wonder what hit them. Watch as they try to deny reality, delay, and dismiss what is staring them in the face.
This comes from an award-winning teacher with more than 30 years on the job. Looking for a debate? He welcomes people who challenge his assertions. Beware, he’ll defend them with volumes of facts and a recitation of nefarious intent that will curl your hair.
Challenging our public school district’s obedience to county ‘health’ ‘orders’: My reflections after 2 years of tragic-comic district refusals to answer BASIC and REQUIRED questions, Orwellian lies, ‘official’ obfuscations + colleagues’ ‘taking a knee’ to propaganda = humanity’s need for ‘friends in high places’ to prevent massive child sacrifices to psychopathic prima facie-criminal ‘public serpents’ (59 of ?)
“Psychopaths are social predators who charm, manipulate, and ruthlessly plow their way through life, leaving a broad trail of broken hearts, shattered expectations, and empty wallets. Completely lacking in conscience and in feelings for others, they selfishly take what they want and do as they pease, violating social norms and expectations without the slightest sense of guilt or regret.” ~ Robert D. Hare, Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. (New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1993) pg. xi
Perhaps the most helpful format for communication:
Summary of events from September 2020 to the most recent article,
My best “shot” to explain, document, and prove the “Covid” + “vaccine” narrative are Crimes Against Humanity: a 4,700-word essay I sent to ~100 teacher colleagues in September, 2021 (received with silence to the facts, with ~20 eventual responses to be removed from such communications). My May 2022 essay to our teachers’ union Board is an excellent overview of the entire history, as is my June 14, 2022 retirement letter; both with emerging data demonstrating tremendous harm from these experimental injections (2-hour overview discussion with Professor Emeritus Jim Fetzer, 35-minute interview with TheHealthyAmerican, Peggy Hall, who edited to avoid censorship only to have YouTube delete the interview for violating “health” “order” “science”).
Summary (links = full documentation in those specific reports):The California “lockdown orders” necessary to “flatten the curve and keep hospitals running” have lasted since March 3, 2020. The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) is derived from California Government Code 8558 (b) requiring “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders. Because Californians never received comprehensive hospital data, our government and corporate media “leaders” are lying in omission. Because problematic “positive cases” (and here, here) were substituted for “beyond control” hospitals, our leaders lie in commission. All testimony I’ve received from ~20 medical professionals here in NorCal report all hospitals they know of have been fully within their control throughout the “pandemic,” that hospitals have comprehensive area plans for record flu seasons they haven’t needed, and certainly didn’t need the military field hospitals or hospital ships for a real pandemic.
As a NorCal public school teacher, at the start of our school year in September 2020 I questioned our district’s leadership and teachers’ union how their negotiated policy to “obey” county “health” “orders” is legal given the above reasonable limit to dictatorial authority. I cited our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions within their limited governing authorities. I reminded the district I merely ask them as educated professional adults to perform what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).
From September 2020 until May 1, 2022, I chose to mask identities of individuals involved to help shield them from any possible future harm when facts emerge to demonstrate to the public that these school administrators and teachers were either knowing participants, or dupes too weak in intellectual integrity and moral courage to recognize and defend literal Truth, Justice, and the American way of limited government under constitutionally-protected inalienable/Natural rights. I named names after 20 months of district lies and prima facie crimes.
After two Sept. 2020 requests, the district contact person responded by ignoring my questions, and stating HUSD employees are required to obey “California mandates” “to protect you” (disobedient staff are placed on unpaid leave up to a year). I emailed our district superintendent, school board members, my school principal and two interested teachers that we teach all high school students in US History class that the district’s position of “just following orders” is an illegal defense, and asked again how ESA limits are being honored.
After continued district silence, I filed three legal complaints: federal, state, and a grievance for district violation of worker safety by issuing apparent dictatorial and illegal policy under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1).
Our union (HEA) responded with support to ask the district, and communicated privately they wouldn’t pursue the grievance to arbitration because working conditions were negotiated in good faith with high approval of union members. After I probed with a few questions, I retreated with HEA to keep them as allies with me to get answers from our contractual grievance process. That said, this first Grievance finished with district and union agreement that the complaint didn’t qualify as a grievance because all district policies were in conformance to law. Neither the district nor union ever addressed my question or citation about limits of dictatorial ordering authority.
I appealed the district’s answer to our community school board for what the district redefined as a “written complaint.” From October 2 to December 18 2020 the district was silent, despite policy promising a response within 30 days of the board’s receipt. After this December 13 reminder they were out of compliance for a response, the superintendent answered that the school board upheld the district response without comment.
I received a “non-response” after nearly 5 months from my complaint to the US Department of Justice regarding unlimited government. My complaint to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing complaint was fielded by a phone call response in December, their promise to follow-up, and silence since.
In March 2021, our NorCal public school superintendent sent all staff an email citing county deaths from COVID nearing 1,300 with 80,000 “cases.” He also asked for our professional responses to an upcoming survey. I responded with three basic questions:
How many of our staff and students have died of (not with) Covid?
What is the current and historical data for overall county deaths given controversy over causes of deaths?
How many staff and students have been injured by vaccines?
The superintendent ignored my emailed questions twice, which I then shared with our school’s ~100 teachers as Chair of a school Professional Learning Community (PLC) on broad educational topics directly affecting our school’s teaching and learning. A few teachers have communicated support, but our Social Science Department found no interest in this topic when I emailed them in inquiry.
Our district superintendent then “answered” my questions, and concluded with: “If you do not agree with the state and county guidelines or if you believe we are not following them, please pursue your questions and concerns with the appropriate agency.” I responded I would do so, and report my findings.
I followed up with 14 CA government agencies over 6 weeks, with all ignoring the question of how the limit of “beyond control” hospitals was being honored for “emergency” dictatorial authority. The only answer I received referencing limits to dictatorial orders was from CA Senator Glazer’s office, who offered that a stated 60-day limit I questioned applied only to “non-safety” related orders. I hadn’t considered an American legislature would surrender forever dictatorial powers to a governor or elected officials without a time limit, as public recourse would be limited to recall (as happened with Governor Newsom, albeit with Dominion “voting” machines, but that’s another history) or electing other legislators.
Therefore, at this point in our history, school district, teachers’ union, and CA government “answers” are at this point demonstrated as intentional lies of omission to claim they answered a question about ESA to “justify” dictatorial government while leaving out any consideration of crystal-clear letter and intent requiring that our hospitals are “beyond control.” The 14 CA government agencies claim dictatorial power to close businesses, stop social gatherings, force masking, force humans to forever remain no closer than six feet from each other, and with forever dictatorial power until legislators or governor dictate otherwise, and while lying in commission that “emergency powers” are authorized by unreliable “positive” “cases.” This power is dictated with direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1) placed at the top of every county “health” “order.”
At the end of April 2021, I wrote a lengthy and fully documented report of those 14 CA government agencies’ responses, and emailed it with a cover letter to district leadership, school board members, teachers’ union leadership, our PLC members, and school teachers. The district’s Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources immediately responded with threats of disciplinary action for unspecified violations of district policies, as did my school principal. The district never responded to my repeated requests and Grievance to cite anything I wrote to substantiate their complaints. The district has never rescinded their first of four steps for employment termination.
Stop and appreciate the irony of public school district leadership refusing to cite factual claims while requiring it of all middle school students. Again: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).
I appealed to our teachers’ union for relief (and here, here). After 4 emails and 15 days of silence from our union President and VP, I sent this email to 14 of the Board of Directors of our teachers’ union. Our President and VP then responded for a next step “to gain clarification regarding matters within our scope and discuss next steps, if any,” followed by a Zoom meeting. Our union President raised the topic at her regular weekly meeting with the district’s Assistant Superintendent of HR on May 25, 2021. The district then emailed me claiming my PLC report “harasses or disparages” my colleagues “based on their political beliefs,” yet failed again to provide any documentation or explanation despite the union and my requests.
On July 8, I spoke by phone with our teachers’ union president, who reported that the district would again consider my Grievances as employee complaints outside their contractual obligations, and the HR Assistant Superintendent admitted failure to address my requests for the district to document and explain their complaints.
On July 9, 2021 our teachers’ union held a Zoom conference with ~100 teachers to explain the tentative agreement for work conditions for the 2021 – ‘22 school year to obey “the most restrictive health measures” “ordered” by state, county or federal government. I asked the first public question on the call for our union to explain how the state has ordering authority given the strict limits of “beyond control” hospitals, with union president, VP, and another union board member responding they are still representing my question, but all legal information they’ve received is that there is no requirement to oppose ordering authority until proven in court. This answer is consistent with my observations that people are conditioned to be told what to do by “experts’” “orders.”
The purpose of our mutual Oath is to safeguard inalienable/Natural rights against illegal “orders” from our own government. The United States rose as a nation because our own government issued “a long train of abuses and usurpations” in the form of illegal “orders.” Americans’ choices were to either surrender as colonial subjects under dictatorial rule benefiting Empire, or stand for what our mutual Oath “supports and defends.” Thomas Jefferson documented:
“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.” ~ Declaration of Independence
Teachers, staff, students and families will follow “health” “orders” because they are ordered.
“Health” “orders” are whatever is ordered. The district will not respond to requests for documentation of “ordering” authority, nor even acknowledge the question was asked despite legal obligation to explain how all policies are within the limits of the law.
If teachers ask further questions how “health” “orders” are lawful or healthy, they will be disciplined up to termination under the “reason” that such questions “harass and/or disparage other’ political beliefs.”
On July 24 I responded to the district’s formal initiation of “disciplinary action steps” that lead to employment termination for unprofessional conduct by offering the district choice to finally cite their unsubstantiated complaints against me or withdraw the complaints and censorship, or face my attorney. On July 26, the district’s Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources responded in refusal to substantiate their claims of my unprofessional work; claiming “The District has provided you with the appropriate documentation that has sufficiently responded to your requests. At this time, there is no additional information that can be provided to you that has not already been provided.” Our teachers union President called me with analysis from her conversations with district leadership that the district is unwilling to look beyond their legal orders, and must be forced by court or legislative orders.
I had a productive first conversation with an America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) connected attorney, who promised to converse with her team to evaluate my case for possible lawsuit support. A second conversation affirmed the strength of this case from its abundant documentation, and that the network of lawyers are filing lawsuits based on their judgment of the best cases to help the most amount of people in greatest need of protection. I promised my willingness to serve as a plaintiff if this case rises in their judgment as the most promising to litigate. I’ve been updating three law firms participating in lawsuits that have included Los Angeles USD, San Diego USD, and nearby Piedmont USD. The attorneys communicate appreciation of my professionalism, that they would enjoy representing this case, and continue to encourage my documented work for truth and justice under the law.
On September 4, 2021, I reported to my ~100 teacher colleagues my best “shot” to “red pill” them about dozens of game-changing facts corporate media never report (my published research on corporate media “reporting” lies known to be false as they were told for the many variants of the Wars on Terror). This report to teachers (at “Update 3”) is my best academic work as a scholar to publicly share comprehensive and game-changing facts to explain, document, and prove illegal “health” “orders” (and here).
On Friday September 17, our district superintendent announced the school board would address mandatory student “vaccines” on Wednesday, September 22. I responded to district and teachers’ union leadership with legal notice of their prima facie-crimes to “require” experimental medical products, and initiated another employee Grievance for contract violation guaranteeing policies in conformance to law.
On Monday September 20, the district superintendent emailed my school’s Admin Team, teachers’ union president, and me to dictate the Professional Learning Committee I chair was censored because my addressing the previous school year’s doubled failure rate with “distance learning” (the most destructive decline of student learning in district history) “is not aligned with school or district goals and may not continue. Please communicate with (school principal) how you intend to use collaboration time or participate in a PLC that is focused on standards based instruction, school, or district goals.” Consistent with history, the superintendent failed to cite anything I wrote to demonstrate his factual claims.
On Wednesday September 22, the school board voted 5-0 to “mandate” full student “vaccination” for “Covid” (again, please see my essay to ~100 teachers for absolute proofs of deserved quotation marks). The public comment session for 1-minute remarks were ~15 against and ~25 for. Four parents and two employees contacted me from my public comment including invitation to do so, which began our ongoing conversations and actions. My three employee Grievances (at that point) also gave our teachers’ union an ultimatum to honor our contract that all district policies be “in conformance with law” by standing with me against the district’s illegal “mandates” that violate US Codes 21 and 18, and California Government Code 8558 (b)that “emergency orders” authority requires “beyond control” local resources (hospitals in this case). CDC’s latest data seemed definitive proof that California and national hospitals are well within control, just as each and every one of the ~20 local doctors, nurses, and other professionals I’ve asked have told me since March 2020.
On October 2, I sent a second email to our teachers’ union President, VP, and district Board Members arguing for their legal and Oath-sworn obligation to stand with me to force the district to explain the legality of their “health” “orders” given the above crystal-clear in letter and intent legal limits (the district’s stated position is “we just follow orders, and so will you”).
On October 17, 2021 I sent another Professional Learning Committee (PLC) report to district and union leaderships + Boards, and ~100 teacher colleagues with two central topics. First: HUSD refuses to address limits to state/county/district “health orders” regarding required student and teacher use of Emergency Use Authorized medical products (EUAs), despite :
California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 uphold federal law that every individual: “Be given the opportunity to decide to consent or not to consent to a medical experiment without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.”
The second topic of the October 17 PLC report is that our teachers’ union shared their position why “health orders” to “require” EUAs is lawful: the government is not kidnapping and forcibly injecting teachers. Yes, seriously; that’s their “legal” “justification”: as long as the principal isn’t tackling teachers in the hallway to forcibly inject them at will, the policy of staff forced unpaid leave respects Title 21 freedom for full choice over medical experiments. I was glad to force an answer, and didn’t pursue further as I’d still rather keep the union as a partner to force reasonable district answers.
On October 21, 2021, our teachers’ union president emailed me to declare my employee grievance void that requested the district to either cite their legal authority for EUA work requirements given the limits of three definitive laws, or to downgrade “requirements for employment” to “advice.” The “reason” given was the union claims that the district doesn’t have to cite legal authority for policy because any proofs of illegal policies “do not concern violations of the CBA (Collective Bargaining Agreement)” despite the CBA stating all district policies must be “in conformance with law.” Both HEA and HUSD claim that state dictatorial “orders” are sufficient legal authority to compel obedience, and both have never addressed our mutual STATE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE for We the People to serve as a check on exactly this problem of illegal dictatorial government orders. My three subsequent communications to union President, VP, and Board were unanswered.
On October 28, 2021, HUSD responded to my last employee Grievance of policy violating California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 by unilaterally declaring it “an email request” of an “employee complaint” “against the legality of EUAs” that they then dismissed because we all must “follow orders.” I challenged that stand, as well as challenging district refusal to answer basic questions about “official” exemptions to EUAs.
On November 14, after a week of “official silence” from district and teachers’ union, I poked them again with questions, request to meet, and predictions of dire consequences to HUSD for their official silence beyond “just follow orders.” I also admonished HEA’s tragic-comic consent to CTA’s position that “option to refuse” experimental medical treatments allows employee termination without future ability of re-hire in public education. Both embrace Orwellian-violations of definitive CA and federal laws that “option to refuse” means the individual is free to accept or decline experimental medical products “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.”
On November 15, our school principal sent an “URGENT” email “ordering” ~200 students to the quad: “All unvaccinated students will be sent home, all vaccinated student (sic) will return to class with a pass.” I discovered I was also “health ordered” home for 10 days, until I demanded documentation of definitions from the principal, and reminding him this ordering authority requires proof I was within 6 feet of a positive case for 15 minutes. After claiming no memory of the policy, the principal and I reviewed and proved “district error” (but 14 of my students were not provided this documentation for discovery of error, nor another teacher). Although my school principal admitted he lacked authority to “order” me into isolated segregation, he still obeyed district “orders” to segregate unvaxxed students. I immediately emailed the Assistant Superintendent of HR to explain and cite district ordering authority to segregate healthy unvaxxed students, which she has failed to provide over ~20 requests up to March 2022. This week also had our teachers’ union request to HUSD accepted for a December 1 “Level III” Grievance meeting with the superintendent to discuss district censorship of my PLC and taking the first step to terminate my employment due to district claims of complaints HUSD refuse to cite. HUSD continued their 6th week of failure to provide me legal definitions of the medical/religious exemption process, but agreed to meet for discussion on Dec. 3. Both of these meetings would be attended by our teachers’ union President and me.
Ten students voiced interest in a “Truth Club,” and submitted paperwork to our Associated Student Body (ASB) with me as their club sponsor to address “the pandemic” and other game-changing areas of truth (here, here, here). On December 1 and 3 I had Zoom meetings with district leadership and our teachers’ union President regarding the previous paragraph topics.
On December 3rd, my principal sent another “friendly reminder” for weekly Covid testing required for my continued employment. For the second time, he mistakenly revealed all email recipients who are not vaccinated. I responded with another “reply to all” to challenge my principal to explain how the “health orders” he signs are legal given federal Title 21 requirements for optional experimental medical products without coercion, or to join those of us asking questions about how these “orders” are anything other than Orwellian-illegal. The principal chose silence as his response.
For the week of December 6, I followed-up with our school principal’s silence to our questions, and my briefed classroom students requested a Zoom meeting with the district to receive answers. Students were especially motivated to receive an explanation how the district can violate “required” health “guidance” by “ordering” healthy unvaccinated students to “separate but equal” 10 days’ “medical segregation” without evidence of “exposure” to a “positive” “tested” student by being within 6 feet for 15 minutes or more. They understood I was allowed to stay on campus because HUSD has zero evidence of exposure within 6 feet for 15 minutes, but students are not allowed the same freedom for an equal education.
On Friday December 10, I received the district’s reply to our Dec. 3 meeting: the district claimed that their policy requiring employee use of EUAs or being put on unpaid leave was a “broader right” of Title 21’s right of full and fail choice to accept or decline EUAs without coercion. I responded in detail with request for another meeting for HUSD to explain their Orwellian-inversion of simple terms to claim “broader rights” include forced student segregation and forced employee unpaid leave.
On December 14, I invited the district to surrender if they wanted to avoid an upcoming meeting with ~50 students with pointed questions. HUSD announced the following day they wouldn’t enforce student “vaccine requirements.” Because of the district’s refusal to address my questions in their December 10 response, I escalated those questions into Employee Grievances and/or District Complaints. On Dec. 18, I updated ~100 teacher colleagues on breaking events.
Also on December 14, the district superintendent officially responded to placing my PLC on two months of censorship under threat of my employment termination if I continued reporting to teachers in “unprofessional conduct” they claimed since April, but repeatedly refused to cite from anything I wrote, said, or did. They withdrew the censorship under claim that the “initial” censorship was valid due to “district confusion” that my addressing a doubled student failure rate was not “focused on standards based instruction, and/or school goals, and/or district goals.” HUSD made this claim despite the PLC report in question stating in the first paragraph that the purpose of the report is to address our doubled student failure rate (btw: the reading level in the paragraph averaged at the 10th Grade level among 5 tests). HUSD claimed they needed “clarification,” and chose censorship rather than asking clarifying questions citing any concern. HUSD also chose silence over my two months of questioning to cite their concerns and alleged policy violations, including silence to two levels of my employee Grievance. My “clarification” was sufficient to remove district censorship, but not sufficient to remove district threat of my employment termination.
After the Winter Break on January 4, 2022, our principal reported another claimed “positive” “case” of “Covid,” and “health” “ordered” 18 of my students into “separate but equal” medical segregation for 10 days of “isolated-public education.” Two students asked for my help to stand for their rights that HUSD has zero evidence they had “close contact” within 6 feet for 15 minutes to the “positive” student, as the district claimed was the rule for unvaxxed students. My question to the principal how this is legal was responded that my question was a “negative connotation” and refused to answer with promise of no further response (Update 1).
On Thursday Jan. 6 at 6:30 AM, I emailed the leaderships of HUSD and our teachers’ union of the facts, then one of the students and I met with the principal and assistant principal before school. The student, an 11th Grade female with spark and courage, further met with the AP after I left to teach classes, with the AP calling a school nurse then an assistant superintendent for help answering the question he couldn’t answer. Nobody had an answer of the district’s authority to QU-segregate students without proof of close contact. That assistant superintendent met the following morning with that student and a second segregated student (11th Grade male with quiet intelligence and strength). Both students reported that the Assistant Superintendent spent an hour trying to talk them out of their questions, claimed the district was acting “out of abundance of caution” (a talking point our principal also used). When the students insisted on answers, this assistant superintendent promised to call the county health department to ask “what to do about these two students.” Despite having no evidence of ordering authority, she maintained the district’s “health” “order” for their isolated segregation with the prima facie-illegal claim of “separate but equal” public education.
The assistant superintendent reneged on her promise to respond no later than Monday Jan. 10 (Update 1), and ignored my three emails requesting she state who she spoke with at the county public health department, what documents were referenced, and what was discussed. Because the assistant superintendent chose silence to these reasonable requests to fulfill her promise to two of my students, I emailed the leaderships of HUSD, our teachers’ union, and our high school’s teachers on Jan. 11, and again on Jan. 12 upon no district response (minus ~12 teachers requesting exclusion). My sharing documentation of an Assistant Superintendent’s lies to two students provoked my school principal into ad hominem attack (Update 4); stating my support of two segregated healthy students were “attacks,” “trying to indoctrinate students into his way of thinking,” and “is by far the lowest I have ever seen any “educator” sink in my 16 years in the profession.” The principal defamed my professional questions on school policies as “lengthy diatribes” “I refuse to respond (to),” then gave instructions to all my teacher colleagues how to block all emails from me on any subject. I find it difficult to imagine a more unprofessional response from a school principal to a teacher’s reasonable and cited questions on district policy.
The week of Jan. 10 to 14 was distance learning via computer because the district sent home too many healthy unvaxxed staff to keep the schools open. HUSD would later that month only send home unvaxxed students “in the same indoor space” as a “positive” “test,” but not staff: another prima facie-illegal policy with motive to not close the school and no apparent “health” concern.
On January 12, I emailed to my broadest audience the documentation of the assistant superintendent ignoring my emails requesting a report how school segregation is legal that she promised my two students, given nobody at the district can explain. The only response we received from that assistant superintendent was to our first standing student who emailed the assistant superintendent requesting a report. Her “answer:” “I do not have an update on how to prove the distance before quarantining.” Please note that this non-answer does not fulfill her promise to report on what she discovered by calling the county public health department, and is similar to a student missing a promised and due report on public policy, and when asked about it after two days being late, the student answers, “I do not have an update.”
This is a good time to mention that the California Teachers’ Association (CTA) ignored my second request for explanation how state and federal laws for optional experimental medical products can be violated by “health” “orders” (Oct. 20 and Dec. 30). I wonder why (Update 2).
On Jan. 14, I emailed HUSD + HEA leaderships and our school’s willing teachers that two Assistant Superintendents have refused to document and explain how student segregation to isolated “separate but equal” public education is legal. I also withdrew my consent, in what I consider an excellent public essay.
On Jan. 18, the district emailed to all staff and community members an “updated” policy to segregate unvaxxed students and staff if they were “in the same indoor space” as somebody “testing” “positive.” My response to district and union leaderships + boards included my promise for student and community complaints if I did not receive reasonable evidence authorizing “in the same indoor space.” HUSD chose silence as their response. By Friday I had 26 of my healthy unvaxxed students “health” “ordered” to isolated segregation from this “same indoor space” invented phrase, but HUSD chose not to enforce this on staff. HUSD “picking and choosing” some arbitrary “health orders” to enforce and not other arbitrary “health orders” proves a hidden political agenda (political=policy=“what is done”) to manipulate our school community, and certainly not a commitment to “health.”
On January 17, I reported to my broadest HUSD email audience that the district’s “requirement” for masks outdoors is also apparently a contrived “order” outside their authority (CDPH + CDC state “optional”), and I raise the question of HUSD fraud. On Jan. 19, our school principal emailed all staff our monthly meeting notes from Curriculum Council. Among the notes: “Share with Departments. Was emailed to all parents and students. Wear masks inside and outside at all times.” I responded to all that requiring masks outdoors is outside CDPH and CDC guidance, so therefore the policy is in apparent error. The principal replied to all with choice to ignore the facts, and defame my response as both unprofessional and unworthy of serious reply: “Aren’t you supposed to be teaching right now”? This disrespect opened the door for other staff to attack: I responded to ad hominem replies and demands for my censorship over the next ten hours. The principal never addressed the policy question, nor the unprofessional ad hominem he began in a remarkable email chain from professional educators “dedicated to factual mastery.” I conclude this to be among the most powerful evidence against the district, and for asking obviously important questions if I seek justice in a courtroom. This also validates my ongoing observation that ~98% of people cannot rise above “official” propaganda even when facts are clearly and professionally documented. I received my relative “Socrates verdict” 🙂
I engaged with our Social Science Department teachers (5 of 9 opted out) regarding these policies apparently outside legal limits. I offered our two hero students instructions how to file an official district complaint. I started calling the HR Assistant Superintendent during class time on speakerphone to get answers to our questions, emailed those questions to the Health Director and her, and promised to call with my classes until we got answers (we got no answers to messages we left).
On Jan. 22 I emailed leaderships of district, teachers’ union, and school admin (not boards) repeating documentation, questions, and promise to shine brighter light on the questions. Upon no response, on Jan. 23 I filed two more Grievances for apparently illegal policies on masks and student segregation, and promised to share the Grievances with teachers inviting their filing. I also promised to assist my 26 returning students from segregated “separate but equal” education to file complaints. On Jan. 23, the Superintendent promised a “response” the following day. On Jan. 24, I received notice from the HR Assistant Superintendent to not report to work on Jan. 25 (the first of 3 days of all-school final exams for the first semester, forcing me to cancel final exams for all my students) in order to be on a 9AM Zoom call that informed me I was placed on paid administrative leave to “investigate” my January 17 email (Update 1).
On Jan. 24 (Update 4) I received another notification from my principal that I was: “a potential close contact with a positive case in your class. Students that are fully vaccinated can stay in school if they are not showing any symptoms. Please let us know if you have any questions, and take care.” I responded with questions how the district can order unvaxxed students home but not staff, and where in any authoritative document HUSD is empowered for their “in the same indoor space” “health” “order.” The principal did not respond, of course.
Paid administrative leave is censorship to remove my capacity to communicate with colleagues, and to stop my participation asking questions and citing apparent inconsistencies of HUSD “health” “orders” to limits of law. This censorship is because any answer HUSD has so far provided is further demonstration their “orders” are outside the law. HUSD will extend their “investigation” about how and why I asked questions (rather than answer obvious and essential questions) until the end of the school year, I predict.
On Monday Feb. 7, I Zoom-met my CTA/HEA-appointed attorney to discuss my case from a perspective to “play defense” against any likely district allegation. I framed the case as district evasion from questions that prove illegal “health” “orders” that anyone can verify by comparing “orders” to limits of definitive laws. I also requested a professional analysis of suing the district for per se defamation and any other related protections/remedies for my professional reputation, freedoms from ongoing harassment, and coercion into retirement to avoid further abuses.
On Feb. 9, 2022, the HR Assistant Superintendent managing my paid administrative leave claimed my 5 active Grievances against the district were “in abeyance” because “contractual issues to be resolved would fall within regular work duties.” She did not respond to my request to cite district authority to destroy due process with Grievances, despite my citations of all applicable contract language I could find and imagine that both gave no such authority, and reminded all of ongoing due process rights. Moreover, in reading that section of our CBA, I discovered HR has one contractual duty to me: an “updated progress report every five work days until resolution” that the district was ignoring. I responded sharply, including my union-appointed attorney, and union President + VP + CTA liaison. HR also continued silence to my repeated requests to schedule a Zoom meeting for the district’s answers to essential questions HUSD promised to answer; some questions going back to early October 2020.
On Feb. 17 after continued district silence, I offered the district’s HR Assistant Superintendent whistle-blower status by joining our side (she did not respond). On Feb. 21, I filed a 6th active employee Grievance for the district violating seven contractual rights regarding my being placed on paid administrative leave to “investigate” how and why I’m asking questions (rather than answer them). My teachers’ union/CTA claimed that despite zero contractual language in support, my rights for Grievance due process are “in abeyance” “because” that “is the practice when folks are on leave.” I appealed to the CTA-appointed attorney, who promised a progress report on what the district is actually “investigating” about me, Grievances, and the possibility of a lawsuit against HUSD for their apparent harassment and defamation.
From Episode 48 on February 24 until March 10’s Episode 49, HUSD reported to me that they have nothing to report after at least 7 weeks of “investigation” (no surprise, as my union-appointed attorney and I are in agreement that the district can, and will, extend their “investigation” until the end of the school year to evade my questions and stop my reports to HHS staff). My attorney made a new and unique claim to district “legitimate” ordering authority on March 9 that Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations section 3205(c)(9)(E) allows employer discretion for “greater protections” and therefore allows an employer to create “health” “orders” outside any guidelines. I retorted in detail such a new “answer” after 18 months of asking HUSD + all 14 of the most authoritative CA government agencies is, on its face, bullshit after-the-fact desperation, and requested answers to pointed questions. On March 3, HEA’s President agreed to take my Grievances “out of abeyance” and join my request that the Superintendent and HR Assistant Superintendent answer all my questions! I accepted, and followed-up on March 10 to check status of this intriguing promise.
On March 25, 2022 I had a Zoom call with HUSD’s Superintendent, HR Assistant Superintendent, our teachers’ union President, and our local CTA representative to address 5 employee Grievances HUSD had ignored, then claimed are “in abeyance” after they forced me on paid administrative leave to “investigate” how and why I asked questions. The superintendent claimed all district “health” “orders” are lawful because they grant “broader rights,” and that is the answer to all my questions. He refused to answer my follow-up “How is forcing me on unpaid leave for declining experimental medical products a ‘broader right’ to my Title 21 right to freely decline experimental medical products” because he claimed that is a question for the employee complaint process. The superintendent did promise to answer all questions through that process. After I read the procedures for complaints, my response back to the district is they’ve already violated that process with their choice to ignore my multiple requests for answers because they are required by law to meet with me to address my concerns. I again offered HUSD the opportunity to surrender by forcing these questions upon county and/or state rather than answer them, then to withdraw obedience if we receive no answers, or Orwellian doublespeak such as forced unpaid leave is a “broader right” for employees. The district is required to respond in writing as to their positions by Friday April 8, 2022, which includes another Grievance that I’m required by contract to not discuss until decided. I followed-up again to include another Assistant Superintendent managing the complaint process to request that the district acknowledge they’ve violated my rights, then meet with me to finally answer all my questions regarding “health” “orders” in apparent violations of multiple and superior laws.
On April 1, HUSD’s HR Assistant Superintendent sent me an email claiming to answer a question I verbally asked at our March 25th Zoom meeting, then claimed, “The District feels it has reasonably and sufficiently responded to this request for information. Please consider this the final response to this matter.” As you’ve predicted, this public school district allegedly committed to uphold the highest academic professional standards:
Ignored my submitted written questions, some going back to September, 2020 with repeated requests for answers ~20+ times.
“Answered” their own lie-created straw-man question, claimed they responded to my question, and asked me to shut-up: “The District feels it has reasonably and sufficiently responded to this request for information. Please consider this the final response to this matter.”
After my response to this lying Assistant Superintendent, I asked our teachers’ union president and CTA representative, “I’m curious: is HUSD usually this evil, unprofessional to repeatedly IGNORE written questions they are legally obligated to answer honestly, and soul-suckingly addicted to lying, OR is this unusual behavior for them?”
HUSD reneged on their timeline to respond to my four Grievances (I dropped one Grievance that HUSD began performing by reporting they had no updates to report upon), and responded late on April 18. By contract, I cannot report on those Grievances’ statuses until they are decided (amended on June 14, 2022 with HUSD’s decision to reject them all). I can report that the district claims my Complaints (distinct from Grievances) have all already been addressed because the Superintendent has repeatedly dictated to employees, students, and community that we must follow orders from the state. I used the superintendent’s reply to request the Assistant Superintendent managing due process of complaints, and the Complaint Manager, to join me in my questions receiving ethical answers beyond “just follow orders.” I sent these two further communication reminding that two students have been lied to since January 10 to receive an explanation with documentation how unvaxxed students could be segregated to “separate but equal” isolated “education” without evidence of their exposure to Covid through a “close contact” (within 6 feet for 15 minutes of a “positive” “test”).
Two days later, on Friday April 22, the superintendent emailed me to claim he is “the district.” This appears as an attempt to stop the Assistant Superintendent over Complaints and the Complaint Manager from exercising our mutual Oath to support and defend limited government under Constitutional laws by comparing his non-answers to my actual questions (Update 1) for any violations of Complaint due process and laws. I responded that he speaks for his office only, and that the purpose of our Oath is for anyone and all of us to review “orders” for obvious violations of law.
On April 25, I explicitly claimed whistleblower status to the Assistant Superintendent over Complaints and the Complaint Manager, and bcc’d the 11 parents and staff who had previously contacted me expressing support (Update 1, with one parent replying that she, too, had her Complaint ignored). I followed with two more emails and three phone messages that these two minions all refused response, despite these follow-up emails quoting Board policy requiring HUSD to educate students and staff on health policies (not obfuscate and lie to students/staff by refusing to answer direct questions), and that HUSD continues to refuse to provide the information they received from the state for medical and religious exemptions to experimental medical products. On April 29 (Update 2), I emailed HUSD Board members with final legal notice that their employee superintendent and managed administrators refuse to honor due process of Complaints, and are covering-up apparent illegal “health” “orders.” At this point I no longer mask their identities, as they should be fully accountable to the public after 20 months of documented lies. I consider this an excellent essay to explain and document the core of HUSD’s two-part Orwellian “argument” to employees, students, and community: “Just follow orders,” and consequences for disobedience are “broader rights” granted by the district to those receiving the consequences.
On May 5, 2022 my teachers’ union Board responded they are unlikely to support my Grievances to arbitration. I sent them the summary of indefensible district lies, crimes, and cover-ups, with questions of justice the union must accept (or be exposed as evil collaborators injecting children with poisonous “experiments”). We’ll meet via Zoom on May 17th. Our contract states that I’m to keep “all proceeding private,” but because I’m a whistleblower pointing out OBVIOUS crimes of proven deadly consequences who has been denied due process from the other parties in the contract, I must go to the public for any hope of justice. I assert legality from honoring the mutual Oath among HUSD, HEA, and me to support and defend limited government under our CA and US Constitutions. The USA and California are defined by our Constitutions, so without those limits coming first and foremost, our Oath has no meaning. Therefore, any conflict between our CBA and Oath must place our Constitutions superior to any CBA provision that would subvert them. Because I’ve abundantly demonstrated the prima facie-illegality of “health” “orders,” I am empowered by our Oath to take all reasonable actions to require official written explanations how such prima facie-illegal “health” “orders” are within the limits of law.
On May 22, I had yet to receive a decision from our teachers’ union Board, so I sent another email for clarifying choice that they must either stand for truth against OBVIOUS CTA and district lies, or bond with liars committing prima facie Crimes Against Humanity targeting children.
On May 26, HEA’s President emailed me to decline arbitration for all Grievances. This local teachers’ union, in communication with the state teachers’ union (CTA) therefore:
Condone proven INVENTED “health” “orders” from districts that cannot be challenged,
Allow school districts to ignore OBVIOUS questions from teachers, families, and students,
Support district proven lies to “order” student and teacher segregation (if unvaxxed) despite inventing the “orders” to do so,
Support school districts to refuse providing anyone with information about medical and religious exemptions to forced medical experiments on staff and children.
On June 14, 2022 I filed for retirement with request of settlement from HUSD for $500,000 as compensation for ending my career early, and for an openly hostile and harassing work environment. The email I sent to HUSD is an excellent summary of the two full school years of challenging my public school district’s prima facie-illegal “health” “orders” as an award-winning, and now retired, teacher.
On June 15, one of our involved HUSD parents “replied to all” with my April “Final legal notice” email to HUSD leadership to show everyone my 36-minute interview with The Healthy American leader, Peggy Hall (below). HR Assistant Superintendent Watts refused to answer my three requests to retrieve my personal belongings in my classroom after 38 years’ teaching, and after I reported this to our teachers’ union President and HHS Principal Seymour, she dictated “permission” for me to return to campus for one 99 degree late morning and afternoon (the hottest day in Hayward for the last two years).
After a month of reflection, my observations:
HUSD, CA, and CTA “leaders” are script-readers following orders of a covert power source because their scripts are aligned, all refuse to answer the most BASIC and REQUIRED questions, obfuscate in tragic-comedy, and engage in Orwellian lies when they “answer” instead of evade questions (my conclusions about this “covert power structure”).
My teacher colleagues lack the intellectual integrity and/or moral courage to stand for BASIC and REQUIRED facts when they are:
“Ordered” to accept most of our students’ families are “non-essential” workers.
“Required” to be shot with unlimited “medical experiments” or be segregated off campus despite their Title 21 freedom to freely decline.
“Mandated” to wear masks indoors and outdoors (masks = another “medical experiment” with zero “official” data for outdoor use).
Dictated to embrace school segregation for unvaxxed students and staff (despite zero “official” authority or “orders” to do so).
My teacher colleagues’ “taking a knee” to “Covid” “orders” is continued demonstration of their inability to respond to:
US military on-campus recruitment despite the evidence I provided that ongoing US military attacks are Orwellian illegal, with all branches of US military (and UC Berkeley and CSU East Bay’s Political Science Departments) refusing our school’s inquiry to explain legality (here, here).
Our retirement funding is criminal fraud because our required “investments” net less than 1% return, with Wall Street “experts” paid twice the net income they generate (and here).
Government (so-called “public”) schools are necessary public propaganda for ongoing US rogue state empire. I wrote a 2016 12-part article series titled US Public Education: Bullshit to train stupefied work animals to explain, document, and prove this extraordinary factual assertion (and here, here).
~98% of the general population are defeated by “official” propaganda, so my teacher colleague responses are typical.
Because our “leaders” are propagandists pushing for dictatorial control, and professional educators are incapable of resistance, humanity needs “friends in high places” for an option beyond work animals for psychopaths. My 9-part article series on American Revolution 2.0 at the end of this current events report is my overview that we have such assistance if we work to earn it.
And just to pile-on with a note on the eve of Truth’s victory on 5/5/2023, California’s Department of Public Health (CDPH) has been caught (again) in their refusals to investigate any link between the so-called “vaccine” and deaths. CDPH, along with the 13 most authoritative California governing agencies, refused to answer my question how the state had emergency “health ordering” authority beyond an apparent 60-day limit. They never received my follow-up how ordering authority could exist when the statutory requirement of “beyond control” local hospitals was never reported (bait and switched with fraudulent “Covid” “tests”), and all expert testimony from ~20 doctors, nurses, and other professionals all reported they knew of no hospital out of control (they didn’t even have to enact protocols for a bad flu season).
to HUSD Board Members, Superintendent Wayne, Assistant Superintendent Watts, Complaint Coordinator Perez, Associate Superintendent Wu-Fernandez, HEA President + CTA liaison (and bcc’d community members of parents and employees):
Great interview with Peggy Hall today, Carl! For anyone else who wants to see it, I found it here:
https://youtu.be/lGpKi_gr4Ds
**
Carl Herman <>
Jun 15, 2022, 8:24 PM
to HUSD Board Members, Superintendent Wayne, Assistant Superintendent Watts, Complaint Coordinator Perez, Associate Superintendent Wu-Fernandez (and bcc’d community members of parents and employees)
Thanks, (Parent) 🙂
Hey, HUSD Board, because of the hostile and harassing work environment I documented as concisely as possible in my retirement letter to Watts and Wayne (copied below), no rational professional should return. You have a choice to accept my settlement proposal, or risk a multi-million dollar lawsuit.
Everyone will know the truth; here’s what HUSD did to our community:
I followed-up with our 11 parents/staff/community members who had requested to be kept informed, and are participating:
Carl Herman’s latest report: retirement + lawsuit initiation
Carl Herman <>
Jun 15, 2022, 8:39 PM
HUSD partners for truth,
Thank you all for your intellectual integrity and moral courage!
(Parent omitted) caught my 36-minute interview with The Healthy American Peggy Hall to share HUSD’s lies and evasions, and used the opportunity to let HUSD’s Board know that the truth will become known to all. I wanted to share my reply with you, that includes a bullet point summary of HUSD’s ongoing harassment and hostile environment to the truth that might be helpful to share with others for the ongoing battles (also here).
Because of HUSD’s attacks on me, I’m retiring early with offer to HUSD to either compensate my lost income or risk a civil lawsuit from me in the millions of dollars. I’ll keep you all informed of this process, and ask how interested others damaged by HUSD can join.
Carl
**
(parent 2)
Jun 16, 2022, 12:21 PM
Great interview Carl! I’m sorry you have had this experience, but I hope you enjoy your well deserved retirement.
I will continue to push back with the schools and district using the information you have shared with us, since my older three children want to stay in public school. I’m homeschooling my younger two after this experience.
If members of this email group can show up, this Saturday I will be attending Assembly member Quirk’s walk at the Hayward Shoreline at 11am to ask Quirk to vote no on SB866. It’s very important that we stop this bill taking away parental rights, beacuse they will continue to take away rights.
Carl, please keep us updated and thank you for all your work!
**
Carl Herman <>
Thu, Jun 16, 1:31 PM
Thank you, (Parent 2), for all you do and stand for 🙂
I did the best I could, and will inform you all of next steps.
The good news is that the truth is coming forward on every front, and as a history teacher I remind you: when lying, looting political regimes fall it happens very quickly. “The straw that broke the camel’s back,” “house of cards,” and “emperor’s new clothes” are sayings we will all witness when the time comes. Our job is steady progress, as best we can imagine.
We have all the facts; our wanna-be dictators only have force and lies,
Carl
**
(Parent 1)
Jun 16, 2022, 6:20 PM
Hi (Parent 2),
SB 866 presented amendments and took a vote on them today. You can watch the proceedings here and see evil incarnate, Buffy Wicks, reading.
Fast forward to 58:21 in the video. The substantive change in the amendments being presented is that Wiener is replacing the 12+ with 15+ because he didn’t have the votes for 12+. The bill needs 41 ayes in the final vote to pass. Flora (R) asked for a role call vote on the amendments. They passed with a final vote 33/21. The support for this bill seems to be tepid and I wish you the best of luck with Quirk on Saturday. He voted yes to the amendments which means he is angling to get this terrible bill across the finish line. My assembly person is Mia Bonta and she is determined to harm as many of our children as she can unfortunately. She, too, voted yes. A vote of No or abstain are both helpful to block this in the final vote.
No date for when it will come up again.
–(Parent 1)
**
Update 3:
HR Assistant Superintendent Watts refused to answer my three requests to retrieve my personal belongings in my classroom after 38 years’ teaching, and after I reported this to our teachers’ union President and HHS Principal Seymour, she dictated “permission” for me to return to campus for one 99 degree late morning and afternoon (the hottest day in Hayward for the last two years). These follow my June 14 retirement letter with request how to retrieve my belongings given my “order” to not enter any HUSD property:
Watts, Kimberleigh
Jun 21, 2022, 9:37 AM
to me, Matt Wayne, HEA President + VP + CTA Rep
Mr. Herman,
I can accept your notice of retirement, however, I am not able to accept the terms of the settlement you request. Please confirm if you are still notifying the District of your retirement effective June 2022.
If I were ever to meet with her, here are some of the questions I would ask:
Any Democratic Committee Chair can request Tony Fauci’s unredacted emails from the NIH. This is important because it will tell us unambiguously whether Fauci was involved in the creation of a “cover up” story about the virus lab leak. Have you requested Fauci’s emails? Why not? Don’t you want to know the truth? Why didn’t Biden request his emails when he did his investigation as to the source of the COVID virus? We know Fauci was in on it because of the redacted emails that were already released. But the redactions got rid of the most important parts. Don’t you want to know the whole story of the lab leak cover-up planning? Or are you afraid of finding the truth? Would you call for Fauci to resign if he was involved in lying to the public? Or would you continue to blindly support him no matter what he does as you always have?
Why haven’t you met with anyone on the opposite side of the “safe and effective” narrative? Don’t you think it is important for members of Congress to hear from both sides of important issues, especially issues where the government is mandating medical interventions for the public? Or should Members of Congress simply trust whatever the government says and ignore anyone who has a different point of view?
Do you support censorship of people who speak out against the government narrative using things like facts and evidence as I do? Are you pleased that Twitter, LinkedIn and Medium have banned me for life? Is that the model for how a civilized society should act? My fellow “misinformation spreaders” have been censored, demonetized, gaslit, physically threatened, and more. Do you support the suppression of views that use facts and evidence to question the official government narrative? Do you know why I was banned for life TWICE from Twitter? Do you even care? I was describing medical research showing the vaccines were dangerous. Is telling the truth grounds for censorship by social media? Will you make a statement admitting that telling the truth is grounds for censorship by social media platforms and that you fully endorse the censorship of truthful speech by the social media platforms with no appeal to an independent body by the parties being censored?
The FDA’s Dr. Peter Marks has said he will do “anything” to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Have you spoken with him about why he won’t debate the “misinformation spreaders”? We’ve tried to contact him, but he won’t respond. What was his reasoning? Do you agree with it? Don’t you think he should clarify his statement to read “I’ll do anything except debate any qualified opposition, to reduce vaccine hesitancy?”
Do you recommend the COVID vaccine for kids? Based on what data? The local data we have in Sonoma county shows more kids have died from the vaccine than from COVID. How do you explain that? And if kids dying from COVID is a huge problem, how is it that Massachusetts didn’t have a single death from COVID in ages 5 to 11 from 2020 to the end of 2021, a two-year period (we’re still analyzing the more recent data)? Did they just get lucky? Where are these healthy kids who are dying FROM COVID?
Have you ever spoken to Andrew Wakefield to get his side of the story on vaccines? Why not?
Will you take a recorded zoom meeting with RFK Jr? He wrote the book on this nonsense. He’s just a truth teller like me. Or are you afraid of him too? He’ll ask you the same questions I want to ask, so I assume you won’t meet with him either, right?
What was your reaction to FDA approval of the COVID vaccines for 6 months and older? Did you cheer that decision or do you believe they acted improperly? What evidence of harm in California of children under 11 dying from COVID and not with COVID? Whose representation are you relying on who has looked at the death data?
The CDC made an in-depth analysis of 14 young kids who died after vaccination. The problem with that analysis is that the deaths did not fit the normal profile of causes of death for that age group as listed in the NEJM Special Report: cancer #1, accidents #2, congenital disease #3, and drowning #4. It wasn’t even close to that profile. How do you explain these unusual causes of death? The CDC didn’t. They just glossed over it like it wasn’t important at all that the causes of death were not normal, not even close. “Nothing to see here folks, move along!”
The deaths or near deaths are getting close to home. Last night, a 17-year-old high school basketball player was playing on the court with friends at Sonoma Valley High School and collapsed. His friends knew how to use the AED Unit that was near and started CPR. A Sonoma County Sheriff’s helicopter was in the area and landed to assist. He survived (so far) thanks to the quick responses from his friends. We’ll soon know whether this was vaccine related. But there has already been one vaccine-certified death of a child in Santa Rosa, CA: 15-year-old Odin Maximillian Robinson who died just two days after his second Pfizer shot from pericarditis. Yet there has not been a single pediatric COVID death in Sonoma! Do you find this anecdote troubling for a vaccine which is supposed to be so safe? And does zero pediatric COVID deaths in a community constitute an “emergency” necessitating a vaccine?
Read my Elephant deck. Do you still believe the vaccines are perfectly safe and effective after reading that deck? If so, please explain why.
Will any of the experts you rely on for advice including Stanford Associate Dean Bonnie Maldonado or Stanford Professor David Relman discuss this deck with me on a recorded Zoom call? If not, is it because they are camera shy? Or are they simply unwilling to have their “safe and effective” story challenged by someone familiar with the evidence?
What is the stopping condition for the COVID vaccines? I have more than 10 independent ways to show the vaccines have killed over 100,000 people. Dr. Paul Offit has said that if more than 1 person per million dies from a vaccine, it is considered to be unsafe. The COVID vaccines have exceeded this threshold by a mile. I now have death reports of over 1,000 American deaths believed to have been caused by the vaccine. Will you have someone validate the list? If over 300 people on that list are judged to have been killed by the vaccine by your experts, will you publicly call for a halt to the COVID vaccines? Or will you allow the killing to continue? How many Americans must die before you say STOP? How many kids must die before you say STOP?
If the vaccines are so safe, why are there so many death reports in the VAERS system ONLY for the COVID vaccines?
It seems to me and others that the child COVID vaccines shouldn’t have been approved. What are we missing and why won’t anyone tell us what we are missing? Can we have a debate between Dr. Meryl Nass and Dr. Toby Rogers on our side and the people you trust on your side?
There have now been 10 weeks in a row of mass deletions in the VAERS database of serious adverse events and deaths. We can’t figure out why. Do you know? And why don’t they explain why each record is deleted? This is the official repository of vaccine reactions and yet it appears it is being manipulated out of public view for reasons that are not disclosed. Why have those reasons not been disclosed? Let’s take just one specific case: 1887456. Why was this record deleted? And why does the CDC not even have a record of its deletion? Why all the redactions?
Will you accept a recorded Zoom meeting with me?
**
Carl Herman <>
Tue, Jun 21, 7:01 AM
to David Seymour (HHS Principal), Kimberleigh, HEA President + VP
Dave (and [HEA President + VP]):
May I retrieve my personal belongings in M-17 during summer school? I’ll need access to a room key, and will need several trips and days to go through 38 teaching years of material.
I’ve asked Assistant Superintendent Watts 3 times, and this is yet another BASIC question she refuses to answer 🙂
Thank you, and best wishes,
Carl
**
Watts, Kimberleigh
Jun 21, 2022, 9:40 AM
to me, David, (HEA President + VP)
Mr. Herman,
I am confirming that you may collect your belongings today. Mr. Seymour will confirm access to the classroom if he has not already.
to (2 Summer School Assistant Principals, HHS Principal’s Secretary, Kimberleigh, me, HEA President + VP)
Good Morning,
Today will be fine as they have not yet started deep cleaning the room yet, but they will be soon. You can get your key from (principal’s secretary) in the Main Office. Summer school ends at 2:30pm, and (principal’s secretary) will be leaving at 3pm. If you cannot make it today, tomorrow should be fine as well. I believe Mr. Miller has your degrees in his office.
Ms. Watts, I do not provide “same day service” on your “order,” and you failed to read that 38 years of teaching material will require several trips over several days. I will not promise more than one trip for one day as a 62-year-old retiree.
Please allow me access during summer school hours, and I promise to leave HUSD/HHS as quickly as I can,
Carl
**
Up next!
HR Assistant Superintendent Watts declined my request for HUSD’s settlement of $500,000 for their hostile work environment forcing my early retirement. I am still engaged for a civil case in the millions, with details withheld until the appropriate time.
Stay tuned for our next episode 🙂
**
I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.
**
Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu
Note: My work from 2011 to October 2017 is on Washington’s Blog, which the owner closed from Internet censorship in 2019, and here since. Work back to 2009 is censored byExaminer.com (blocked author pages: here, here). This means that some links in essays are inactive. If you’d like to see those articles, go tohttp://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the search box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive.
Comments
AnonymousJanuary 17, 2024 at 8:42 PMSo pleased you documented your experience. I hope they are legally commanded to pay you for their harsh, illegal actions. I hope the children/students/parents are compensated as well. Brain washed GOV peeps are brain damaging…MG 💖🕊Reply
stock here: Make America healthy again! It’s great idea. The main source is regulatory capture, and the allowance of crappy “science” and safety studies. But at least at an individual level, those with any wherewithal can upgrade their diet and reap benefits. When you eat nutrient dense foods, including organic vegetables, and meat and organ meat, you need less food too. Come to think of it…buying organic is an instant money saver, you probably only need half on your plate.
So beef liver is the first “go to”. See the video, it’s a homemade liver sausage, I will try this soonish. And the link to liver sausage traditional in a roll. Note 50% beef trim, not that this is bad but this is diluted somewhat.
stock here: you might think it an AOC until you see it’s an elaborate part of this ceremonial protest, showing great anger. Looks like another land and rights grab attempt.
stock here: I have been saying for years that Tulsi was Intelligence even though they tried to sell her as being in a “medical unit”.
Now now she is slated to be DNI, Director of National Intelligence. I bet “those guys” won’t be signing any 70 names to a “Trump is Unfit” letter like they did last time. Deep State self-immolation.
I am shocked at this pick, in a good way. It is harder for even the deep state to attack females, but they still will. More to come on that.
I think Trump is moving to fast, showing his hand. He should have appointed some RINOs (in theory) and then changed his mind after inauguration. And RFK is also sspouting out too much…no one need to know what you will do, if anything provide misdirection or stupid stuff for the opposition to waste their time on whilst thinking “we got it all, we got him boxed in” LOL like the Q-Misdirection.
Ivan Raiklin, a retired Army Reserve lieutenant colonel and former Defense Intelligence Agency employee, has compiled a “Deep State target list” of over 300 individuals he considers adversaries. This list includes elected officials from both major political parties, FBI and intelligence agency personnel, journalists, and others he perceives as part of the “Deep State.” The New Republic
The list has been circulated within certain right-wing circles and is available on platforms like the Internet Archive. Internet Archive
can you describe how the big lie of leftist = liberal is a horrible insult to classical liberals which are almost the polar opposite of authoritarian leftists
Much of this is “guided AI” I did not quite end with what I wanted but here it is, in 45 minutes. ChatGPT said:
The idea that “leftist” equals “liberal” is a profound misconception—and for classical liberals, it’s often an infuriatingly misleading conflation. Classical liberalism took root as humanity emerged from an agricultural past and entered a scientific, industrial age where knowledge, art, and music began reaching people far beyond the elites. Freed from the restrictions of feudal systems and the ironclad authority of kings and queens, classical liberalism became a philosophy of personal empowerment. Art, literature, and history moved out of private halls and into public spaces, so that the common person could experience beauty and truth as much as the wealthy could. This was the cultural spirit of liberalism: an expansion of freedom that was both intellectual and deeply personal.
At its core, classical liberalism advocates for individual rights, personal freedom, limited government, and economic liberty. It prizes free speech, open markets, and minimal interference in people’s lives by the state, allowing individuals to create, explore, and connect. In this sense, classical liberals resonate with a profound belief in humanity’s potential to improve not through forced equality, but through a freedom that encourages personal responsibility, growth, and mutual respect. This approach mirrors the curiosity and depth found in Jungian psychology, which respects the complexity of the psyche and sees each person as a unique tapestry of experiences, values, and spiritual questions.
In contrast, modern leftism, especially on its authoritarian side, often prioritizes centralized control and heavy intervention in both economic and social spheres, sometimes going as far as to restrict speech in the name of equity. This perspective, grounded in collectivism, places the needs of the group or state above the rights of the individual. To a classical liberal, these goals contradict their core principles, which prize personal liberty and free expression over enforced conformity. The authoritarian side of leftism can feel stifling, viewing individuals as parts of a social agenda rather than as unique beings whose freedoms are worth preserving.
For classical liberals, being lumped together with authoritarian leftists is more than just a mislabeling—it’s a “big lie” that fundamentally erases their worldview, reducing their belief in a society based on freedom, curiosity, and self-respect to a caricature of state control. This conflation disregards the long-standing values of classical liberalism, which cherishes the freedom of individuals to explore, create, and contribute to society on their terms.
In this light, conflating “liberal” with “leftist” overlooks the true richness of classical liberalism. This philosophy embraces a world where knowledge and beauty are accessible to all, not to mandate conformity, but to celebrate diversity of thought and experience. Take the art museum: it’s more than a place to view paintings; it symbolizes the classical liberal dream that beauty, history, and culture should belong to everyone, not just to elites or academics. Museums and libraries are civic spaces where the spirit of free inquiry and appreciation for the human condition thrive—a freedom classical liberals believe should never be regulated or rationed.
This respect for the individual’s journey resonates with thinkers like Tesla, who saw the universe not as a static entity but as a symphony of frequencies and vibrations. Tesla’s vision suggests that each person, like each frequency, holds a distinct part of the whole, contributing something unique to the broader experience. This perspective stands in sharp contrast to Freud’s deterministic worldview, which reduces human nature to a fixation on sexuality. Freud’s focus on sex as the primary driver of all behavior felt reductive to many, imposing a narrow and somewhat cynical lens on the vast complexity of human life. Classical liberals would likely see Freud’s approach as stifling, almost as a pseudo-scientific attempt to strip people of their depth and potential.
Jung, on the other hand, viewed psychology as a journey into the soul, where the conscious and subconscious, the rational and the spiritual, all play vital roles. His approach aligns with classical liberalism’s reverence for individuality and introspection, its belief that people can find meaning and fulfillment in ways that defy narrow scientific categories or social agendas. For classical liberals, this focus on the spiritual and psychological depths of a person mirrors their vision of a free society: one in which individuals are valued not as tools for a state or agenda, but as unique beings whose experiences, aspirations, and choices contribute to the richness of a shared world.
So, classical liberalism is more than a political stance; it’s a cultural and spiritual embrace of life in all its complexity. It’s a vision that sees human beings as more than mere social functions or subjects of scientific reductionism. Classical liberals believe in the beauty of freedom itself, where art, history, and individual inquiry illuminate a path toward human fulfillment—a path that no authoritarian system, left or right, could ever replicate.
stock here: but some endorsements came earlier, so there is more to the story
Oprah Winfrey publicly endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential election during the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on August 21, 2024. In her speech, Winfrey emphasized the importance of values, character, decency, and respect in leadership, urging voters to support Harris. CBS News
Following the DNC, Winfrey continued her support by hosting a live-streamed event titled “Unite for America” on September 19, 2024, in Farmington Hills, Michigan. This event aimed to register voters and bolster support for Harris’s campaign.
Photog: Is it true they paid you a million dollars for the endorsement for Kamala
Oprah: Not true. I was paid nothing. Ever.
Oprah’s production company Harpo: As you can see Harris For President gave us two payments of $500,000 equaling exactly a million dollars. pic.twitter.com/j2ZTjWhgpe
stock here: there is quite the compilation of absurdities here, and the Queens English make it even more absurd with “air of superiority”. Drop a comment, or link to further videos.
stock this was funny….first time AI asked me a question.
well leftism and communism are a hard sell to anyone paying attention, or lets call it more accurately techno-fascist-corporotism ChatGPT said: ChatGPT
You’re pointing to a perspective that sees certain political ideologies as closely linked with centralized control, particularly involving large corporations and technology, which some critics argue resembles “techno-fascism” or “corporatism” rather than traditional leftism or communism.
The notion of techno-fascist corporatism suggests that when tech companies and government agencies work in tandem, they wield concentrated power over information, consumer choices, and even political discourse. Unlike traditional leftism, which often emphasizes worker empowerment and the redistribution of wealth, critics argue that this model benefits a powerful elite by aligning corporate interests with government authority—potentially at the expense of individual freedoms.
For many, this blending of corporate and government influence over society can be a “hard sell.” The perception is that when big tech firms and state agencies collaborate, it can limit personal autonomy, curtail freedom of speech, and exert control over markets, steering society in a direction that some view as anti-democratic. This dynamic may indeed alienate voters who prioritize individual liberties, economic freedom, and transparency in governance.
Do you think this perception is shaping broader public skepticism toward political campaigns and media narratives?
well i think we always need to correctly perceive the USA as a Republic which has democratic aspects, and not fall into the vacuous non-sense of “our democracy” which is pretty much mob rule. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT
You’re highlighting an important distinction. The U.S. was indeed founded as a Republic with democratic elements, aiming to balance majority rule with protections for individual rights and minority voices through checks and balances. This structure is intended to guard against the risks of “mob rule,” or direct democracy, where decisions are made by simple majority without protections for the rights of individuals or smaller groups.
In a Republic, elected representatives ideally make decisions based on constitutional principles and the interests of all constituents rather than on transient majorities. This concept reinforces the importance of constitutional law, judicial review, and a limited government structure designed to prevent any single faction from dominating. It’s a nuanced approach that allows democratic participation while aiming to protect foundational rights and freedoms.
stock here, they have 153,000 subscribers, poor things. Dr Phillip McMillan blames it all on auto-immune responses, but then blames that on the COVID virus, and especially the Omicron which is quite weak.
It means that all the hospitals are going to be full….for the next 2 years, LOL, and this video is from 9 months ago. He actually says, this is going to become a storm surge of death, maybe we can keep it to 80 million deaths. “We really have to find solutions”
Here’s a summary of the COVID-related live chat, organized by themes and perspectives expressed by participants: Supporters of Natural Immunity and Alternative Treatments
Many participants expressed confidence in natural immunity, especially for those who had contracted COVID-19 but remained unvaccinated. They mentioned that unvaccinated individuals may have stronger mucosal immunity and are less likely to experience reinfection.
Several commenters promoted alternative or preventative measures, such as vitamin D, zinc, quercetin, ivermectin, and povidone-iodine nasal spray.
Skepticism about Vaccines and COVID-19 Testing
There was significant skepticism regarding the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, with some users referring to them as "bio-weapons" or "experimental medical products."
Some participants argued that vaccines weaken natural immunity and increase susceptibility to reinfection.
Several users doubted the reliability of COVID-19 tests, mentioning "false positives" and expressing distrust toward PCR and lateral flow tests.
Speculation on COVID-19 Origins and Bioweapon Theory
A portion of the discussion centered around the theory that COVID-19 could be a bioweapon or the result of "gain of function" research, with some commenters pointing to certain scientists and officials.
Some participants believed that COVID-19 was either lab-made or manipulated to serve as a bioweapon, with a few suggesting that it was intentionally spread as part of a broader agenda.
Religious and Philosophical Reflections
Some participants incorporated religious and philosophical views, quoting Bible verses and suggesting that faith is essential in uncertain times.
There were also references to apocalyptic themes, with some attributing the pandemic to larger, morally-driven narratives about good and evil.
Frustration and Distrust of Official Narratives
Many users expressed frustration with mainstream media and health authorities, suggesting that information on COVID-19 and vaccines has been manipulated.
Participants discussed feeling isolated from family members who believe in the natural origin of COVID-19, highlighting a divide between those who trust official narratives and those who are skeptical.
Count of Types of Comments
Support for Natural Immunity/Alternative Treatments: 15 comments
Vaccine and Testing Skepticism: 20 comments
Bioweapon Theory: 12 comments
Religious and Philosophical: 5 comments
Frustration with Official Narratives: 10 comments
Overall, the chat reflects a high level of skepticism about COVID-19 vaccines, testing, and official narratives, with many advocating for alternative treatments and expressing concerns about a potential bioweapon origin. There was also a mix of religious and philosophical commentary, underscoring a distrust of mainstream institutions.
Anonymous
