stock here: Is it what causes the acceptance of absurd ideas, they cannot see reality, even when it comes to their own appearance? Or are they working the frame of a Participation Trophy, you are special just because you ARE.
In my view, she is OK with having her views, but to turn a religious ceremony into a lecture to the incoming president was weird, disrespectful, and not effective in providing information to anyone in anyone that it could be informative, or useful to the recipient.
stock here: this is from my article June 2023
Here is the EO withdrawing from WHO
stock here: I am not going to even attempt to cover everything going on in Trump world. But 2 of the main tools of the Kabal, are Climate and Health. Defunding the WHO and preparing to pull out completely, is therefore a HUGE MOVE. He did it. Now let’s look at “It”.
“Bill Gates controls the WHO which mandates ‘vaccines’ for the entire World…” -RFK Jr.
— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) January 21, 2025
President Trump has DEFUNDED the Criminal Entity of the WHO…which is owned by Communist China, the Gates Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiatives.
pic.twitter.com/lOcAUO0bsK
A-Eye sayeth:
The claim that “Bill Gates controls the WHO which mandates ‘vaccines’ for the entire world” is inaccurate. While the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a significant contributor to global health initiatives and supports the World Health Organization (WHO), it does not control the organization. The WHO is governed by its member states, and decisions are made through the World Health Assembly, comprising representatives from these countries.
Regarding the assertion that President Trump has defunded the WHO, it’s important to note that in January 2025, President Trump initiated the process to withdraw the United States from the WHO, citing concerns over the organization’s handling of global health issues. This move involves halting U.S. government funding to the WHO, reassigning federal personnel, and identifying alternative partners to take over WHO’s activities. Experts are concerned that the withdrawal could reverse progress in combating diseases such as AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis, and weaken global defenses against new pandemics.
AP News
As for the ownership of the WHO, it is an international public health agency composed of 194 member states. While the Gates Foundation is a notable donor, contributing to various health programs, it does not own or control the WHO. Similarly, neither the Gates Foundation nor the Clinton Global Initiative owns the WHO.
In summary, while influential private foundations like the Gates Foundation contribute to global health efforts, they do not control the WHO or mandate vaccines worldwide. The WHO operates based on the collective decisions of its member states.
stock here, from ZH, an OK analysis. Although “forking” with a bishop means that one of the pieces was already on target, and therefore was already protected. So the start of analysis is flawed.
On Fork number 3. Trump has a great move that can be played — acknowledge that the collective west threatened Russia with putting weapons on Ukraine border with Russia, that Russia would not be able to stop before hitting Moscow (which is in the far west of Russia, 280 miles away). That means 8 minutes with a supersonic missile. Let the full truth out….the Deep State Globalists, who were laundering money through Ukraine, caused this conflict, so they could move huge money and skim off much on that non-accounted for monies. Ukraine is how the Biden family skimmed off 10’s of millions, and the proof was all there prior to this “war”. Russia should keep what they have as a “buffer zone”, give those areas independence but as a territory, and all Russian assets which we have control over, should be returned to Russia.
———————————– This article originally appeared on The Daily Reckoning, which uses the POS comment form Disqus which is clearly a tool of the Globalists to censor, therefore only 2 comments. They pretend that you can log in using Facebook, or X, or Google, but in reality, they just force to to “link” your other account to POS Disqus. I am banned at Disqus (and all accounts leading to Disqus)
I had to go to page 4 of ZH to find the referenced article so I can post my above comment, let’s see how that goes….
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/2025-sitrep-cleaning-bidens-mess
https://archive.ph/Vuz9k#selection-913.0-1036.0
The first Biden fork involves new economic sanctions imposed on Russia in connection with the war in Ukraine.
Biden has imposed new “ghost fleet” sanctions on Russian oil exports. The term ghost fleet refers to oil tankers that are not insured in the London market and may involve vessels that are re-flagged, renamed or turn off their transponders while in transit. In short, the ghost fleet is used by Russia to deliver oil exports (usually to China or India) in defiance of western oil export sanctions.
Biden’s new sanctions prohibit ghost fleet vessels from entering and docking in ports of countries that support the sanctions. A number of NATO nations, especially those in the Baltic Sea and Gulf of Finland, have said they will board Russian vessels to check their insurance documents. In extreme cases, oil cargoes may be seized by NATO navies, although that is rare. All these actions closely resemble high seas piracy.
Sanctions of this type never work for long. There are too many ways around them, beginning with the fact that importers like China and India do not support the sanctions. That said, the ghost fleet sanctions will tend to raise the price of oil because finding insurance or taking circuitous routes can be expensive.
Here’s the fork: If Trump keeps the sanctions in place, he’ll be blamed for causing inflation resulting from higher oil prices. If Trump removes the sanctions, he’ll be branded as a Putin puppet. Trump can choose his response, but either way he’ll lose. He’s either causing inflation or bowing to Putin.
The next fork involves the course of the war in Ukraine. Biden and Ukraine are escalating the war to a point that’s dangerously close to nuclear war. This escalation includes using intermediate-range ATACMS missiles to strike targets inside Russia. Russia responded by using its Oreshnik hypersonic missile to strike a factory in Dnipro. The missile not only destroyed the factory, but turned it to dust.
Biden did not get the message. The ATACMS launches continued, followed by the brazen assassination of a top Russian general and his aide on the streets of Moscow. Biden also delivered tens of billions of dollars of new funding to Ukraine and supplied missiles and artillery shells from severely depleted U.S. arsenals.
The fork: If Trump continues on this pre-determined path, the war will go on as the Biden Neocons hope. That means Trump will get the blame for the ultimate collapse of Ukraine, which is coming. On the other hand, if Trump de-escalates, he’ll be called a Putin stooge and be blamed for any peace deal that concedes Ukrainian territory to Russia. Again, Trump can choose to escalate or deescalate, but either way he’ll be blamed for the Ukrainian defeat. Trump can choose but he’s bound to lose.
A third fork involves Biden’s move to steal Russian-owned U.S. Treasury securities to support a loan to Ukraine to be used in its war with Russia.
In February 2022, at the start of the war in Ukraine, the U.S. and European Union (EU) froze about $300 billion of Russian assets in the form of U.S. Treasury securities lawfully purchased by the Central Bank of Russia. About $200 billion of those securities were held in custody by Euroclear, a major global clearinghouse and custodian based in Brussels.
Freezing assets is a standard technique in financial warfare. Typically, the assets remain frozen while the war (or other cause for sanctions) persists but can be un-frozen once some treaty or other agreement is reached. In this case, the U.S. has gone further and actually stolen about $50 billion of interest on the securities to be used as collateral for a loan to Ukraine that almost certainly can never be repaid.
This extreme action is one reason why the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and other group members) are moving quickly to build non-dollar payment systems and are acquiring gold as a reserve asset that cannot be frozen or converted by the U.S.
Again, Trump has no good options. If he continues to support the loan made with stolen assets, he contributes to the long-term decline of confidence in the dollar. If he stops the loan program and either demands that the loan be repaid or otherwise restores the stolen Russian assets, he will be accused of undermining Ukrainian war efforts or supporting Russia or both.
As an incoming president, Trump should have freedom of action with regard to policies involving economic sanctions on Russia, escalation of the war in Ukraine, and weaponization of the U.S. dollar through asset seizures. He won’t. Instead, his hands have been tied by Biden’s forking moves that leave Trump with options but none of them good.
In chess, one way to avoid losing a piece in a fork is to put one of your opponent’s high value pieces in jeopardy. For example, if Black is confronting a fork, it can position a piece to take the White queen in one move. That way, White will act to protect the White queen instead of taking the Black knight or rook. The player on defense (Black) moves to offense to avoid the White fork.
Trump can do the same to Biden. He could hold a press conference or give a speech explaining to the American people exactly how Biden has acted in bad faith and jeopardized the best interests of the United States with his forks.
A transition is intended to give time for a smooth transition from one administration to another. Instead, Biden has used the time to lay traps for the new administration. Trump should call him out, explain why he will act in the best interests of the nation, and insulate himself from the canned criticisms of the progressives and the legacy media. This high road approach will make for an ignominious end to the already failed Biden presidency.
stock here, this is surprisingly fast. Just look at this picture. They are proud that they have 40% women enrolled at the Coast Guard Academy.
Coast Guard Commandant Linda Fagan was just terminated for prioritizing DEI ahead of border security. Goodbye! pic.twitter.com/v2sSOBq7ja
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 21, 2025
A-Eye:
Admiral Linda L. Fagan, the first woman to lead a branch of the U.S. military, was relieved of her duties as Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard on January 21, 2025, by Acting Homeland Security Secretary Benjamine Huffman. The decision was reportedly due to concerns over her focus on diversity initiatives at the expense of border security, recruitment challenges, and an erosion of trust stemming from the mishandling of sexual assault investigations.
Reuters
Qualifications at Appointment:
When appointed as the 27th Commandant on June 1, 2022, Admiral Fagan brought extensive experience, including:
Education: Bachelor of Science in Marine Science from the U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Master of Marine Affairs from the University of Washington; Master in National Resource Strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces.
U.S. Coast Guard
Service: Over 37 years in the Coast Guard, serving on all seven continents.
U.S. Coast Guard
Leadership Roles: Positions such as Vice Commandant of the Coast Guard, Commander of the Coast Guard Pacific Area, and Commander of Coast Guard Sector New York.
U.S. Coast Guard
Pioneering Achievements: First woman to serve as Vice Commandant and the Coast Guard's first female four-star admiral.
U.S. Coast GuardPersonal Background:
Admiral Fagan was born in Columbus, Ohio, to Jon Harley Keene and Loann Carol (Morris) Keene. She is married and has a daughter, Aileen, who is also a U.S. Coast Guard Academy graduate.
stock here: I guess Ben will be the same. It seems somewhat odd to make the change, and Not ALSO, leave the old site up (it is gone) and so anyone linking to past videos is not going to go to a dead link. Another bone to pick, the Big Burb is taking longer to build than my 66 Mustang.
https://www.youtube.com/@SpaceWeatherNewsS0
I get spaceweather emailed to me from the UK Met office, you can sign up for a “premium” account at zero cost.
https://login.auth.metoffice.cloud/dce84ec6-ce0f-45d1-ba16-e36b817081eb/oauth2/v2.0/authorize?p=b2c_1a_victory_susi&response_type=code&client_id=2340ca18-475e-4366-b5bd-cb751c5fee7d&response_mode=form_post&scope=openid%20offline_access&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fpremium.spaceweather.metoffice.gov.uk%2F_callback&nonce=173749857180000&state=%2F
stock here: calling it out. This had 40 comments when I first viewed it, see the first picture. Then see the later picture taken 20 minutes later, 17 comments. I started making a comment and got immediately censored, Facebook enables this, but I think it is the “fake” account holder doing the censoring.
They are using the false argument of false dicomotomy, aka it has to be be one way or the other, ONLY, TY A-Eye
The term you’re looking for is “false dichotomy” (also known as a false dilemma). It refers to a logical fallacy in which only two options are presented as if they are the only possibilities, ignoring other viable alternatives.
Your sentence could be rephrased for clarity as:
“They are using the false argument of a false dichotomy, claiming it has to be one way or the other, with no other options.”
I wonder how long this comment is going to remain, it just came up.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1635413383637782
stock here, check it out: They got game.
stock here: I have been suspecting that these drone videos exist, I wish they were better mapped out, explained as to where exactly they are, and of higher image resolution.
A-Eye:
Khan Younis is a city in the southern part of the Gaza Strip, a Palestinian territory located along the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea. It is the second-largest city in Gaza after Gaza City. Here are some key details about Khan Younis:
Geography and Location:
Coordinates: Approximately 31.34°N latitude and 34.30°E longitude.
Nearby Areas:
To the north, it borders the city of Deir al-Balah.
To the east, it is close to the Israeli border.
To the southwest, it is near the border with Egypt and the Rafah crossing.
Coastal Location: Khan Younis is situated a few kilometers from the Mediterranean coast.Significance:
Historical Importance:
Khan Younis was established as a caravanserai (roadside inn) in the 14th century during the Mamluk period, serving as a stop for traders and travelers.
Population:
It is a densely populated urban area with both residential neighborhoods and a large number of Palestinian refugees living in a refugee camp within the city.
Economy:
Agriculture and small-scale industries form the economic base of Khan Younis, although it faces challenges due to restrictions on movement and trade.
Conflict and Humanitarian Issues:
Khan Younis has been heavily affected by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, experiencing military operations and airstrikes over the years.
It has significant humanitarian needs due to economic blockades, limited access to resources, and infrastructure challenges.Cultural and Social Aspects:
Palestinian Culture: The city is home to rich traditions of Palestinian culture, including music, cuisine, and community life.
Refugee Population: Many of its residents are refugees or descendants of refugees from the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, with a large UNRWA-administered refugee camp in the area.Khan Younis plays a vital role in the socio-political landscape of Gaza and remains an area of focus in the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
stock here: I am shocked and amazed:
Hawaiian Style: A Discussion on Personal Choices
By Kalani Santana
Kalani Santana
“I know some of you find it funny because of your disagreement, but let’s never forget—it’s a personal choice for everyone. Everyone has their own reasons for doing it or not doing it. I respect either way, as civility works that way too. Respect goes a long way. I just hope people can see my point of view. Aloha!”
Jordan Lerma
“Can we be happy it’s your choice and not post it in a public group?”
Kalani Santana
“Jordan Lerma, I just had to share a point. Glad there are others who understand.”
Brenda Adams
“It doesn’t keep you safe and definitely not others. Just pray it doesn’t harm you as it has so many.”
Kalani Santana
“Brenda Adams, it works for me. I mean, I can still get the flu, but not the serious kind. Mahalo.”
Jason Donovan
“Kalani Santana, let’s cut the names like flu and COVID out. Let’s just say upper respiratory.”
Kalani Santana
“Jason Donovan, 👍🤙.”
Kris Nelson Wolle
“Kalani Santana, oh, sorry to tell you that you can absolutely still get the flu, serious or not. I do agree, though—freedom of choice is important.”
Deborah Louis
“Jason Donovan, there’s a huge difference. I wish it was just an upper respiratory infection.”
Deborah Louis (to Brenda Adams)
“In my healthcare work, I’ve witnessed it benefit many individuals, including my own family members. Let’s just be kind about people’s choices!”
Brenda Adams
“I wasn’t unkind. Did you even read my post? I happen to be in healthcare and can think for myself. I have seen so many with adverse reactions. Getting the vax doesn’t mean you won’t get sick or prevent you from passing it on. Let’s be kind to people sharing their experiences.”
Chris Terry
“So uninformed, but opinionated without justification. Do yourself a favor and do some homework. You’re probably alive because your parents had you vaccinated.”
Demian Barrios
“Yes, it’s a personal choice. So why the need to share your choices publicly if not for attention or to start conversations on the matter?”
Kalani Santana
“Demian Barrios, I respect your comment. Just hoping people can see my point of view. Glad there are people who do, though. Can’t expect everyone.”
————————————- A-Eye
Conclusion
The discussion around personal choices continues to be a sensitive and polarizing topic, but mutual respect and civility go a long way in maintaining constructive conversations. As Kalani said, “Respect goes a long way. Aloha!”
Personal Choice and Public Debate: A Discussion on Vaccines
Kalani Santana
“I agree with you 🤙 and I’m glad you got yours. It’s just too bad people believe unproven theories instead of doctors and scientists who have studied medicine for most of their lives, going all the way back to the polio outbreak.
I don’t know what would’ve happened if we didn’t have the polio vaccine.
Just a note to everyone else—this is my personal feeling. I am not looking to argue this point. If you comment directly addressing mine, I will delete your comment. However, feel free to make your own statement as a separate comment. Thank you.”
Sally Sefton
“Are you talking about vaccines? Vaccines are a personal choice, but they help prevent terrible illnesses if everyone participates. Look back in history: polio, typhus, whooping cough, measles, and of course, COVID.”
Andy Rauch
“Sally Sefton, that’s not how a vaccine works.”
Chris Harris
“Vaccination being a personal choice is like saying whether to receive the polio vaccine is optional.”
Marc Landry
“Chris Harris, it is a personal choice, and it doesn’t keep anyone else safe.”
Bruce Blyth
“Just so you know, it doesn’t work. Facts hurt. NEXT.”
Kalani Santana
“Bruce Blyth, true—not for everyone.”
Kathleen O’Leary
“Bruce Blyth, which vaccine are we talking about?”
Paul Menichini
“Bruce Blyth, it doesn’t work? Correct. Here we are four years later, and tens of thousands of people are still dying every week. Oh wait, no they’re not. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that shortly after the vaccine was released, the numbers started tumbling. Antivaxxers amaze me.”
Deborah Louis
“Bruce Blyth, not true!”
Julie Bryant Bartolini
“Bruce Blyth, but did you die?”
Kathy Ann Masengale Johnson
“Too bad more people don’t agree with you. I chose, for my own reasons, not to be vaccinated, but I’m perfectly happy to let everyone make their own decisions.”
Kalani Santana
“Kathy Ann Masengale Johnson, trying to make a point, but I guess some others don’t get it. Sadly.”
Kermit Hanson
“Kalani Santana, I respect your point. But I have no respect for the people who dismissed others’ choices not to get the vaccine and militantly persecuted or even advocated for withholding medical treatment for those who didn’t get it. I hope those people are shamed into oblivion.”
Julie Bryant Bartolini
“Kermit Hanson, did people really choose not to medically treat the unvaccinated? Being in healthcare, I never saw care denied to the unvaxxed. It’s not in our oath to judge patients!”
Ea Kealoha
“Julie Bryant Bartolini, even in January 2025, there are people needing organ transplants who are being refused because they didn’t get the mRNA injection. It’s very much a ‘thing’ and widely publicized for those paying attention.”
Marc Landry
“My doctor admitted that part of his education was funded by the pharmaceutical industry. He said they’re taught it’s their responsibility to convince the public to comply with what pharmaceutical companies want to sell. Doctors used to be taught to be honest and identify false research findings.”
Jason Donovan
“I work at a school as a custodian—four years, no vaccine, never got COVID. I’ve lost people to that shot, though. Also, many people I know have gotten boosters and had COVID three times. The only medal going into my body is lead.”
Jack Magnus
“Thanks for posting and for getting vaccinated. You’re helping reduce the spread of flu—and it’s a nasty one this year. Ignore the haters and the paranoid. Polio was beaten by vaccines.”
Terry Harris
“Choices you make in society affect others in that society. I wish more people would balance their personal rights with others’ rights to life.”
Stacey Rosman
“Maybe we should share a post if we get circumcised? Seems relevant if getting a flu shot is.”
Dervie Hernandez
“Wow, I agree with your post. People just don’t get it and still respond with rude comments. It’s his personal right to do whatever he wants. Much aloha to you and your ‘ohana!”
Paul Savage
“Can you put a palm tree and ocean behind you instead of that wall?”
Eloy Art Farbin
“The next pandemic will kill us all.”
Rob Pace
“The Fauci Ouchie 💉.”
Lisa Mitchell
“I’m embarrassed for you 🫣.”
VOG and “Hair” Alert
stock here: I watched a few hours of the “Off Road Recovery” the whole company is likeable and funny. And there is a trail called the Rubicon, in which they did a difficult recovery and have some incredible off road videos. Don’t check them out unless you have time to burn, because you will burn.
Here is the Rubicon, cross it today.
stock here: has has such disdain for the common citizens
https://x.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1880429231433265649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1880429231433265649%7Ctwgr%5E2204259b4af6314e75972c5f0346a9177a3184ff%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpjmedia.com%2Frobert-spencer%2F2025%2F01%2F18%2Fthe-man-who-destroyed-the-justice-department-gets-a-heros-sendoff-from-his-accomplices-n4936127
In reality, if free societies survive and free people write the histories, Merrick Garland will be remembered as one of the central villains of our time, who came close to criminalizing political opposition and thereby destroying the republic almost singlehandedly. And so Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) commented on the video of the DoJ lemmings cheering Garland: “Merrick Garland has left @TheJusticeDept for the FINAL TIME. His DOJ attacked concerned parents. His DOJ attacked religious Catholics. His DOJ attacked political opponents. His DOJ was unprecedentedly weaponized. This disgraceful era of brazen political lawfare is FINALLY OVER.”
Well, we can hope that it is. But “the evil that men do lives after them,” wrote Shakespeare, and the cheers and applause Garland received from Justice Department bureaucrats bore witness to the truth of that adage. Many, if not most, of the desk jockeys who were busy clapping and shouting hosannas at this sinister corruptocrat will continue to work at the DoJ during the Trump administration. These are this man’s admirers, pupils and proteges. They will be working to place the largest possible obstacles they possibly can in the way of Trump’s efforts to reform the department and make it once more into an instrument of impartial justice. That is the miserable legacy of the atrocious Merrick Garland.
There is simply nothing good that can be said about Garland’s four years as attorney general. His most egregious act was ordering the raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, supposedly in search of classified documents that Trump had illegally taken and was improperly storing. But what the raid was really all about was humiliating Trump and trying to hang something, anything, on him that would bar him from running again in 2024. And the banana republic attorney general was actually proud of this, announcing: “I personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter.”
The unctuous hatchet man reminded Americans that the search warrant “was authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause.” He didn’t mention, of course, that the judge who authorized the warrant was an Obama donor and Jeff Epstein’s old lawyer. But this out-of-control authoritarian did take the time to go heavy on the disingenuous flag-waving: “Faithful adherence to the rule of law is the bedrock principle of the Justice Department, of our democracy. Upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor. Under my watch, that is precisely what the Justice Department is doing.” Yeah. Raiding the home of the president’s chief rival on the flimsiest of pretexts — that’s certainly what I think about when I think of what it means to apply the law even-handedly.
The Trump raid was a watershed event in American history, representing the complete breakdown of the mutual respect that the competing factions in American political life have always had for one another, and the conversion of what are supposed to be politically neutral law enforcement organizations into weapons of partisan politics. And this was, according to the proud testimony of Merrick Garland himself, the handiwork of none other than Merrick Garland.
stock here: Eff the Effen Effers
https://www.facebook.com/junior.kekuewajr.1/videos/525813366495416
stock here, check out this unlikely site too
stock here:
stock here: this is really beyond belief.
Rarely do we get analysis and history. Here is one.
stock here: well nothing fishy to see here. Santa Sussana Site of open air nuke tests, and a meltdown.
