stock funnies here
meme fest, also funny, It’s Labor Day, have a laugh!
Categories
Category: Uncategorized
stock here: Watch it your self. Let’s call it the “Alternative Science Community”. And bottom video, today, a blast off solar flare at earth, but only M2. But it’s fast and “Full Halo”, aka fully directed at Earth.
It’s great that Ben is on Bitchute. It is easy and simple to watch stuff on YouTube, but we really need to take efforts to de-power these censors that be.
Commenters ebleive we have multiple psy-ops going on. We deserve better psy-ops.
stock here: RFK better keep up his TRT, he is going to be viciously attacked even more than now. When the rhetoric becomes serious financial loss….”their” game is going to be ramped up.
————————-
The CDC’s increasingly desperate fight to shield vaccine injuries from public scrutiny
͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for moreUnmasking CDC Corruption: RFK’s Battle to Reform Public HealthThe CDC’s increasingly desperate fight to shield vaccine injuries from public scrutinyA Midwestern DoctorAug 29 READ IN APP Since RFK Jr. became H.H.S. Secretary, my contacts have shared that the CDC (one branch of the H.H.S.) has been the primary government agency sabotaging attempts to Make America Healthy Again. In July, I thus wrote an article on the CDC’s pervasive corruption that highlighted the CDC’s scientific misconduct at a recent ACIP meeting to help create support for controversial changes RFK Jr. would need to enact at the CDC.Yesterday, that all came to a head as the CDC’s director was fired a month into her job, briefly refused to leave, four other top CDC officials resigned (which coupled with five earlier retirements in March comprised a loss of about a quarter of the CDC’s senior leadership). These actions prompted a media uproar and a hearing to “hold RFK accountable” has already been scheduled for next week.This is a pivotal moment where RFK needs the public’s support for restoring America’s health, so I believe it is critical to understand the complete context behind what happened, particularly since many of these CDC holdouts have been directly responsible for the mass gaslighting against the vaccine-injured.The Forgotten Side of Medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. To learn more about how this newsletter and how readers have benefitted from it, click here!Upgrade to paidThe Roots of EvilOne of my major questions in life is if the bad things that happen are a result of a secretive group of bad actors or are simply a naturally emergent phenomenon that would occur regardless of which group was in power behind the scenes.On one hand, I frequently see policies be enacted in a coordinated fashion that lead to a clear outcome, and then watch as the years play out, that every institution works in unison to ensure that outcome eventually comes to pass. As such, given how repetitive (and hence predictable) this process is, I tend to suspect each one is a deliberate “conspiracy” by a specific group of bad actors.On the other hand, when I speak to the most informed people I know within the government, I hear things like this:You can always point a finger at a specific agency or person, but the reality is that as the government gets bigger and bigger, more and more fiefdoms will emerge within it, and those groups will fight for their own interests at the expense of everyone else.Note: many Federal agencies depend on obtaining congressional funding and, therefore, will engage in stunts to ensure that funding is allocated to them. For example, the CDC will routinely hype up inconsequential “pandemics” each year, as this nationwide drama allows them to obtain more funding. Beyond this motivating the CDC to lie, the need to maintain a guaranteed stream of public and private funding also boxes the CDC into repeating the same (risk-free) narrativesad-nauseam so they do not offend their sponsors. This tendency to habitually repeat industry canards (e.g., that water fluoridation is one of the greatest public health achievements besides vaccines, that chronic Lyme disease doesn’t exist, or that all vaccines are 1000% safe and effective) in turn explains why more and more people are tuning out the CDC.CDC CorruptionThe CDC has enormous credibility among physicians, in no small part because the agency is generally thought to be free of industry bias. Financial dealings with bio-pharmaceutical companies threaten that reputation.—Marcia Angell MD, former editor in chief of the New England Journal of MedicineIn reality, CDC corruption is so pervasive, it’s effectively been legalized. For example, a 1983 law authorized the CDC to accept gifts “made unconditionally…for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service or for the carrying out of any of its function,” and in 1992 Congress established A National CDC Foundation which was quickly incorporated to “mobilize philanthropic and private-sector resources.” Note: other Federal agencies, including the CIA and the NIH, have similar “non-profit” foundations.1,2,3Since inception, the CDC Foundation has been accused of egregious conduct and has received nearly 1 billion dollars from corporate “donors” (criticisms include a scathing editorial in one of the world’s top medical journals). For example, to quote a 2019 investigation:In 2011….a firm that performs research for the pesticide industry, gave $60,000 to the CDC Foundation for a study to prove the safety of two pesticides. “We have a professional money-laundering facility at the CDC Foundation….They accept projects from anyone on the outside.”Between 2010 and 2015, Coca-Cola contributed more than $1 million to the CDC Foundation. It also received significant benefits from the CDC, including collaborative meetings and advice from a top CDC staffer on how to lobby the World Health Organization to curtail its efforts to reduce consumption of added sugars.The BMJ also reported on contributions from Roche to the CDC Foundation in support of the CDC’s Take 3 flu campaign, which encourages people to “take antiviral medicine if a doctor prescribes it.” Roche manufactures Tamiflu, an antiviral medication for the flu [for reference, Roche was able to convince governments around the world to stockpile hundreds of millions of dollars of Tamiflu (an ineffective drug that was never proven to work).These “donations” in turn often shape the “impartial” guidelines we are expected to follow. For example, in 2010 the CDC foundation created a coalition which received over $26 million from major pharmaceutical companies producing hepatitis C treatments. Shortly after, a committee was created to create new CDC hepatitis C treatment recommendations, and an Inspector General report found many of its members had direct ties to those pharmaceutical companies.Note: key funders of the CDC foundation (detailed here) include key Democratic political advocacy groups, vaccine organizations such as GAVI and the Gates Foundation, the major vaccine manufacturers (e.g., Pfizer, Moderna, Merck and J&J), and tech companies such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and PayPal.In 2016 CDC employees anonymously complained about this corruption:It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests…What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right. We have representatives across the agency that witness this unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units.Recently, the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) has been implicated in a “cover up” of inaccurate screening data for the Wise Woman (WW) Program. There was a coordinated effort by that Center to “bury” the fact that screening numbers for the WW program were misrepresented in documents sent to Congress; screening numbers for 2014 and 2015 did not meet expectations despite a multimillion dollar investment; and definitions were changed and data “cooked” to make the results look better than they were. Data were clearly manipulated in irregular ways. An “internal review” that involved staff across CDC occurred and its findings were essentially suppressed so media and/or Congressional staff would not become aware of the problems.Finally, most of the scientists at CDC operate with the utmost integrity and ethics. However, this “climate of disregard” puts many of us in difficult positions. We are often directed to do things we know are not right. For example, Congress has made it very clear that domestic funding for NCCDPHP (and other CIOs) should be used for domestic work and that the bulk of NCCDPHP funding should be allocated to program (not research).Why in FY17 is NCCDPHP diverting money away from program priorities that directly benefit the public to support an expensive [global health] research that may not yield anything that benefits the [American] public?In February 2019, two Democrat Congresswomen provided the evidence to request a formal investigation of CDC’s interactions with Coca-Cola and its broader corruption. Unfortunately, due to the politicization surrounding COVID, all of this was swept under the rug and forgotten.Ideology or Corruption?I also frequently wonder to what degree conduct I find reprehensible is due to corruption or simply ideological fixation.In the case of vaccines, while clear financial conflicts of interest can be shown in certain cases (e.g., the CDC Foundation), I find the zealous adherence to all vaccines being “safe and effective” tends to be ideological in nature, as believing in vaccines has been instilled as a core belief of anyone affiliated with “science” or “medicine.” Initially this can be quite subtle, but in time, that ideological bias quickly adds up. This is because most things aren’t clear cut, so depending on what one is biased to notice vs. filter out, one can rapidly be left with a world view where all “the evidence” supports their position, even if a great deal of it does not (which is a major reason why “rational” people can have such diametrically opposed belief systems).This is a critical to understand as evaluating the actual risks and benefits of a routine vaccine requires you to assess:•What percent of the unvaccinated population is likely to get the infection.•What percent of those infected will have a moderate or severe illness. •How effectively the vaccine prevents those vaccinated from catching the illness or developing moderate or severe complications from it. •How long the vaccine’s effectiveness lasts. •How long does it take the infection to become resistant to the vaccine (making it useless). •What are the consequences of the vaccine triggering a population-wide mutation in the infection. •Is there a viable alternative to vaccination? •How likely the vaccine is to cause an acute moderate or acute severe reaction. •How likely the vaccine is to cause a chronic moderate or chronic severe reaction. •Who is at risk of having a more severe reaction to the vaccine?Each of these, let alone all of them, is quite a task to figure out, and as a result most of the relevant points for each of the above simply are not taken into account when deciding upon a vaccine recommendation. Instead, a few marketable points are highlighted and the assessment of the vaccine’s risks and benefits are seen through their lens (e.g., “cervical cancer is deadly” and “the HPV vaccine prevents cervical cancer”), while pieces of evidence which challenge the predetermined conclusion (e.g., evidence of vaccine harm) are dismissed and filtered away.As a result, many vaccines are on the market where their risks clearly and unambiguously outweigh their benefits, while in parallel, vaccines are viewed as a homogenous entity despite some (e.g., COVID or the HPV vaccines) being much more dangerous and unnecessary than many others. As many people have requested, I have provided a concise summary of the risks and benefits of each childhood vaccine here.Note: while adherence to abhorrent policies is typically ideological, my sense is that as one goes higher in the hierarchy, the more leaders within the public health field (e.g., the CDC) are consciously aware of what they are complicit in, but nonetheless perpetuate it to protect their power base (whereas those lower in the power structure accede to the dominant narrative as doing anything else often ends careers).Vaccine InjuriesBecause of this “ideological filtration” many everyday proponents of vaccination are completely unaware that vaccines frequently harm people (e.g., with severe neurological injuries). So, when confronted with evidence of harm, they use a variety of excuses to dismiss those injuries.For example, 4 Democrat Senators who pushed the COVID vaccine had highly unusual neurological injuries all strongly linked to the COVID vaccine, yet none of them have recanted their support for it. Likewise, a Senate aide I spoke to shared that other Senators have had vaccine injuries, but none will publicly admit it, and at best instead have focused on getting treatment for “long COVID” (and emphasized that now it is critical for us to educate the Senate’s vaccine proponents on the reality of vaccine injuries).As much of the opposition to acknowledging vaccine injuries appears to be psychological rather than financial in nature, Ron Johnson recently used his chairmanship to hold an excellent hearing (I would advise watching) where those who had been injured by vaccines and then abandoned could tell their stories and force the Senators who habitually dismiss the existence of vaccine injuries to be directly confronted with them.Note: formal hearing like this never happen, as the last one was 25 years ago (for children who developed autism following vaccination), and prior to that those used for 1986 Vaccine Injury Act.The ACIPA popular tactic for taking advantage of people is to have an impartial and trusted “third party” implement your policy for you (e.g., funding a “non-profit” with an environmentally friendly name to advocate for polluting).This tactic is used throughout the medical field (e.g., experts on television, medical journals, guideline committees and patient advocacy groups are often pharmaceutical mouthpieces). The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is the group that advises the CDC on the vaccine schedule, and as you might expect: •Until RFK’s recent changes, almost every member on it had financial conflicts of interest. •ACIP almost always votes to add the vaccines presented before them to the immunization schedule. •ACIP always ignores anyone who presents “anecdotal” evidence of vaccine injuries. Note: in the one case I know of where ACIP voted against a vaccine recommendation (COVID boosters for adult workers), the CDC simply overruled them.As such, I noticed a pro-vaccine witness at Johnson’s hearing, who after sharing the tragic story of her infant sister dying from influenza said they testified in front of ACIP, “ACIP listened” and then made infants six months and older all be vaccinated for the flu—despite roughly 100 “flu related” deaths occurring annually in infants, and thousands of complications (including death) in the 6-10 month age range having been reported in VAERS (a system which captures less than 1% of injuries).I found this noteworthy as:•This also happened in 2013 with Merck’s expensive meningitis vaccine (less than 1 in a million children die from meningococcal disease each year, and Merck’s vaccine did not cover the primary strain causing deaths1,2,3), so Merck had two parents whose infants had severe complications from the disease to testify in front of ACIP, at which point it was added to the schedule and funded by the government.•These anecdotes translating to implementing a (scientifically unjustifiable) policy, while any evidence of vaccine harm never accomplishing the same illustrate how powerful the perceptual filters are in these people and why groups like the CDC and ACIP can routinely recommend vaccines which are hundreds if not thousands of times more likely to harm than benefit the recipients.Hiding The DataEvidence based medicine was created as a way to overturn medicine’s dogmatic resistance to abandoning bad medical practices. Unfortunately, before long, industry realized this could be overturned by monopolizing the “best evidence” (e.g., through the medical journals and mass media), hiring experts to promote their evidence, and burying any conflicting evidence as non-credible.Once this new dogma was established, an even more incredible feat was accomplished—forbidden anyone besides chosen experts from being able to see the raw data which produced that evidence, thereby forcing us to again “trust the medical experts.”Following this, an even more remarkable sleight of hand was accomplished—instilling a standard where no one besides approved experts could look at the raw data behind the science we base our lives around. As that data is regularly doctored (e.g., we found out through lawsuits the V-safe data the CDC used to prove the COVID vaccines were safe was presented in a misleading manner which hid the innumerable injuries within that dataset). Likewise, while every healthcare authority throughout COVID assured us the vaccines were being rigorously monitored for safety, we never got their data, and eventually through years of work, Steve Kirsch (e.g., through whistleblowers) was able to obtain government datasets showing the vaccines were killing and seriously injuring many people.Note: this is a key reason why RFK Jr. and NIH director Jay Bhattacharya (to restore trust in science) are pushing for science to return to data (rather than “expert” opinion) determining scientific truth through a variety of initiatives aimed at making data available and scientists being encouraged to attempt to replicate studies so we can determine if their data actually is not valid (as much of the existing scientific literature is not). ACIP and the CDCWhen seeking drug approval or vaccine recommendation, there are several boxes that must be checked to ensure “safe and effective” products reach the public. However, meeting those standards is again quite subjective (e.g., they are used to stonewall alternative medical products from ever being approved). As such, if something supports the medical industry its subjected to minimal scrutiny (e.g., Pfizer was not required to test the vaccine for effects on autoimmunity, fertility or cancer despite these being major concerns from the start).As such, in ACIP meetings, the CDC, without providing its data, will often give a brief statement asserting the safety and efficacy of a vaccine, which the ACIP takes as a definitive truth regardless of conflicting evidence.During COVID, the ACIP meetings became a morbid hobby of watching a slow motion train wreck, as we knew nothing we did could derail them pushing the COVID vaccine along, but at the same time, we couldn’t turn our eyes away from it, as we did need to know what depressing vaccine policies were in the pipeline.Recently, RFK’s new ACIP had their first meeting, where for the first time, the CDC received pushback for their unwarranted claims. Unfortunately, as the CDC had not adapted to this new reality, they continued repeat their playbook, making remarkable claims such as:•Infants were at high risk of becoming severely ill from COVID despite existing data showing very close to 0 infants are dying from COVID.•Most positive COVID tests at admission correlated with COVID causing their hospitalization (“86% of adult hospitalizations during that time period were likely attributable to COVID-19”).•According to the CDC’s private analysis, all datasets show there is no statistical proof the COVID vaccine caused many of the injuries people attributed to it (e.g., death, seizures, strokes, bell’s palsy or any issues in pregnancy such as miscarriages) and that the signals suggesting otherwise in databases we can access are “false positives.” Note: I was most surprised by the CDC asserting their analysis “proved” the COVID vaccine was not associated with abnormal menstruation—despite numerous studies comprising hundreds of thousands of women finding roughly half experience this side effect.1,2,3,4,5,6•That while a risk of myocarditis does exist, the risk is very low, and that 83% percent of those afflicted fully recovered in 90 days. In contrast, a study the CDC failed to mention found that at 12-18 months, 35% reported persistent symptoms, primarily chest pain, palpitations, or fatigue, 13% remained on medication, 8% restricted exercise (mostly self-initiated), and 5.6% required hospitalization. Note: Ron Johnson’s previous hearing provided proof the CDC deliberately withheld data showing COVID vaccines caused myocarditis to protect the vaccine program.There were also remarkable admissions such as:•The CDC still had no explanation for why COVID had evolved into variants that were resistant to the vaccine (a concern from the start, as the vaccine used a single rapidly mutating antigen).•The CDC had no way to track longterm complications from the COVID vaccine, as over time “more and more confounding variables are introduced” and that the CDC would welcome any advice ACIP had on how those complications could be monitored.Changes at the CDCRFK Jr. was appointed to become H.H.S. Secretary under the expectation he would make America Healthy Again by reforming America’s health agencies and scientific apparatus so that they served the people rather than corporate interests. As trillions of dollars are potentially on the line for those industries, they are doing everything they can to undermine RFK’s efforts, and were it not for both RFK’s public support (specifically the MAHA base which is necessary for the midterms) and Trump fully supporting RFK Jr. to “go wild” (particularly on exposing the dangers of routine vaccination), RFK Jr. would not be able to do a fraction of what he is doing now.Because of this, it was effectively a miracle (I never imagined was possible) RFK was nominated that required all of us to do everything we could to sway the tie breaking senators. However, that hard fought victory required RFK to make numerous concessions to win over the last Senator, and since that time, forces throughout the government and media have been mobilized to stifle any attempts he makes to reform those agencies.Because of this (and existing Federal statutes), implementing the needed changes can’t happen overnight, which has led to split views on the tactics RFK has taken—with some like myself being astonished at how quickly he is enacting permanent and previously unthinkable changes in the healthcare system (which many members of the medical orthodoxy consider “apocalyptic”), while others are greatly disappointed RFK Jr. has not already done more.Unfortunately, the extraordinary latitude RFK has did not extend to the CDC, demonstrated by the fact that MAHA’s CDC nominee (Dave Weldon) was blocked by the same Senators who almost derailed RFK’s nomination. Remarkably, in 2023, Biden passed a law (which went into effect in 2025) requiring the CDC director to pass a Senate confirmation, hence making it nearly impossible for an outsider like Weldon to head the agency.Following this, Trump nominated a new CDC director (RFK publicly endorsed) who easily sailed through a Senate confirmation (and whom MAHA journalists like Josh Walkos highlighted had far too many ties to the pharmaceutical industry). However, after assuming office on July 31, friction emerged (e.g., she tried to get Senator Cassidy involved in her disputes with RFK Jr.), and eventually on August 27, the H.H.S. announced Monarez was no longer with the CDC. Following this, her lawyer immediately issued this public statement:  When asked about this the next day, Trump’s press secretary stated:Look, what I will say about this individual is that her lawyer’s statement made it abundantly clear themselves that she was not aligned with the president’s mission to make America healthy again, and the Secretary asked her to resign. She said she would, and then she said she wouldn’t. So the president fired her, which he has every right to do. Look, if you are doing your job well, and if you are executing on the vision and the promises that the president made to the public…you should have no fear about your job, just do your job. That’s what this president wants to see.Likewise on Fox, RFK Jr. publicly stated there were serious issues within the CDC:Why Was Monarez Fired?There appear to be two major sources of conflict between RFK and the CDC—acknowledging that real dangers exist from vaccination and concerns about key employees within the agency. This second point is crucial, as presently, due to the CDC’s structure, the only way someone who was appointed to a senior position within the agency can be terminated is if the CDC director does so.As such (and from having read through numerous reports on this topic), I am relatively certain that at the time Monarez was appointed, she had agreed to fire problematic officials who remained from previous administrations, but once assuming office, backtracked on that commitment. Let’s now look at the officials in question: For example, Daskalakis (director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases) quickly posted a similar resignation letter on X. While a bit long, I thought what it illustrates was worth extensively quoting:I find that the views [RFK] and his staff have shared challenge my ability to continue in my current role at the agency and in the service of the health of the American people. I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public’s health. The recent change in the adult and children’s immunization schedule threaten the lives of the youngest Americans and pregnant people.Having worked in local and national public health for years, I have never experienced such radical non-transparency, nor have I seen such unskilled manipulation of data to achieve a political end rather than the good of the American people.Some examples include the announcement of the change in the COVID-19 recommendations for children and pregnant people…The recent term of reference for the COVID vaccine work group created by this ACIP puts people of dubious intent and more dubious scientific rigor in charge of recommending vaccine policy to a director hamstrung and sidelined by an authoritarian leader. Their desire to please a political base will result in death and disability of vulnerable children and adults. I have always been first to challenge scientific and public health dogma in my career and was excited by the opportunity to do so again. I was optimistic that there would be an opportunity to brief the Secretary about key topics such as measles, avian influenza, and the highly coordinated approach to the respiratory virus season. Such briefings would allow exchange of ideas and a shared path to support the vision of “Making America Healthy Again.” The intentional eroding of trust in low-risk vaccines favoring natural infection and unproven remedies will bring us to a pre-vaccine era where only the strong will survive and many if not all will suffer. I believe in nutrition and exercise. I believe in making our food supply healthier, and I also believe in using vaccines to prevent death and disability. Eugenics plays prominently in the rhetoric being generated and is derivative of a legacy that good medicine and science should continue to shun. The recent shooting at CDC is not why I am resigning. My grandfather, who I am named after, stood up to fascist forces in Greece and lost his life doing so. I am resigning to make him and his legacy proud. I am resigning because of the cowardice of a leader that cannot admit that HIS and his minions’ words over decades created an environment where violence like this can occur. I reject his and his colleagues’ thoughts and prayers, and advise they direct those to people that they have not actively harmed.For decades, I have been a trusted voice for the LGBTQ community when it comes to critical health topics. I must also cite the recklessness of the administration in their efforts to erase transgender populations, cease critical domestic and international HIV programming, and terminate key research to support equity as part of my decision. Public health is not merely about the health of the individual, but it is about the health of the community, the nation, the world. The nation’s health security is at risk and is in the hands of people focusing on ideological self-interest. I wish the CDC continued success in its vital mission and that H.H.S. reverse its dangerous course to dismantle public health as a practice and as an institution. If they continue the current path, they risk our personal well-being and the security of the United States. Sincerely, Demetre C. Daskalakis MD MPH (he/his/him)In short, it’s understandable Trump wanted this guy out as he is a symptom of the woke ideology which displaced science during the Biden administration, and hence quite surprising Monarez refused to fire him. Likewise, this letter makes it clear an ideologue like him would have done whatever he could to protect the vaccine program and bury any admission of vaccine injuries.I next looked into his background and learned that after pioneering an HIV prevention strategy in New York City which emphasized the heavy testing and usage of costly transmission preventing medications and aggressive (non-stigmatizing) outreach to the LGBT community, he was brought into his CDC directorship in 2022, a move many felt was related to Biden’s aggressive DEI (diversity equity and inclusion) push throughout his administration.Once there, we has deeply involved in many of the CDC’s most controversial programs at that time, such as monkeypox fear mongering and vaccine promotion, the aggressive targeting of minority groups for COVID vaccine and testing, and his strong support of COVID-19 vaccine mandates. I then went and checked, and the other three officials who just resigned also were vaccine proponents with ties to the COVID vaccines. For example:Dr. Jernigan said he was also increasingly uncomfortable with the things he was being asked to do, including providing data for a new analysis of vaccine safety data for potential links to autism, even though dozens of studies have already examined that claim and not found a connection.The three had been contemplating leaving the agency for weeks, they said. But their distress escalated sharply after the new members of the vaccine advisory panel said that they would revisit the childhood and adolescent immunization schedules when they met again in the fall.ConclusionFrom reviewing these events, two things are particularly striking to me.First, once they lost their positions, these “public health” officials rapidly revealed how malignant their views were towards the health of everyday Americans, hence providing a critical window into who could have possibly been willing to enact the cruel and unscientific mandates we saw throughout COVID while relentlessly covering up all evidence the vaccines neither safe nor effective. Likewise, they also illustrate why it is so dangerous to have ideologues like this in the government and why they needed to go to Make America Healthy Again. Most remarkably however was the bubble they lived in, as I feel the resignation letter Daskalakis wrote rather than garner sympathy he wanted, will turn many against him—yet he still wrote it.Second, all things considered, I am surprised RFK was able to eliminate a few bad apples this quickly (normally it takes forever to change things in the government), particularly given the blowback RFK has received in the press. All of this hence makes me believe RFK’s team is very cognizant about the timelines they are working under to address the rot within the Federal Health Agencies (e.g., if they allow government employees to delay MAHA’s work, it will likely be impossible to get many key goals accomplished by 2028).For example, we still have no explanation for what has caused the rapid rise in autism, and for decades the CDC has gone in circles to divert from that unpleasant question (as it’s flagship product, vaccines, are likely one of the primary culprits), hence making it quite noteworthy, the day before this firing (August 26), at a cabinet meeting in response to Trump stating The autism is such a tremendous horror show. What’s happening in our country and some other countries, but mostly our country. How are you doing?RFK stated:We are doing very well,” Kennedy responded. “We will have announcements as promised in September, finding interventions, certain interventions, now that are clearly almost certainly causing autism. And we’re going to be able to address those in September.Note: I recently finished reading an excellent book that breaks down all the games the CDC has done for decades to hide the link between vaccines and autism which is also being released in September I plan to review in an upcoming article as it provides excellent context to the CDC’s habitual misconduct.If we take a step back, it’s clear the CDC has failed to address its core mission, as chronic disease in America has continually increased, while the CDC has remained focused on issues that often harm rather than improve public health (e.g., water fluoridation), and aggressively advocated for highly politicized approaches that abjectly failed (e.g., their COVID-19 countermeasures). As such, the agency needs major changes, but since many within it are deeply vested in the power that position affords to them, as these events show, they will not voluntarily relinquish it.Fortunately, now that the CDC’s halo of objective expertise has at last been broken (e.g., currently, only 61% of Americans trust the CDC), we are finally having a chance to seriously scrutinize their absurd claims, and the CDC is nearing the day where it can no longer operate as an unaccountable fiefdom. Each time we openly discuss their lies, their power weakens, and I am profoundly grateful to be with each of you at a time when this monolithic beast can finally be toppled, vaccine injuries can finally be acknowledged and the CDC can switch from a corrupt agency to one that serves the public interest.Your support makes The Forgotten Side of Medicine Possible. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Upgrade to paidClick below to share this post!ShareAn index of all the articles published in the Forgotten Side of Medicine (including each DMSO article) can be viewed here. Additionally, to learn how other readers have benefitted from this publication and the community it has created, their testimonials can be viewed here.You’re currently a free subscriber to The Forgotten Side of Medicine. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.Upgrade to paid LikeCommentRestack © 2025 A Midwestern DoctorSubstack Inc., 111 Sutter St 7th Floor, San Francisco, United States 94104 Unsubscribe   |
stock here: Make your own judgements.
This police chief plays the classic statements and lies. Looks like a hire.
stock here: check it out.
stock here: I threw in the Huma thing. It is beyond belief that the multi-billionaire son would marry someone as old and not pretty as Huma, she doesn’t even have a decent body. Is she some type of sorceres, directly linked to the underworld?
I tried to find this quote on Trump’s real X account, and could not find it, so there. Comments on some tweets indicate that the deployment of Nat’l guard to many democrat run cities, is in fact, a pre-emptive efffort to quell known upcoming violent protests and mostly peace burn-downs.
Note in the comments, many people are supposedly supporting Soros. Weird, but probably paid by Soros!!!!!
Also, calling out a new meme….That Trump is “importing” 600,000 Chinese.
Trump: "George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America." pic.twitter.com/KBxuyAaisF
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) August 27, 2025
This guy is truly a psycopath, he goes beyond “just” sociopath:
From Presidential Badge of Honor to Potential RICO charges.
— World of Finance (@FinancesWorld) August 27, 2025
Love to see it. https://t.co/ewxOuPJaB6
stock ehre: there is so much activity going on worldwide.
stock here: cause?
stock here: It’s worth spending some time on this, as Bernay’s style proaganda takes over our world.
Well, considering the vast divide between what europe and usa have in regard to just liberalism, as you said below (see chart at bottom), I think coining my new definition is OK and justified, at least for USA. For Europe, I think they are pretty horribly misguided at this time, especially in their support for the overly corrupt and manufactured country of Ukraine (really just MIC support and Russia phobia, whilst hundreds of billions of money was landered through Ukraine and mostly ending up in corrupt leftist hands) and ignoring the genocide of Palestine, in which 87% of the deaths have been non-Hamas civilians.
———————————
ChatGPT said:
That makes sense — and you’re right, the word “liberal” already has radically different meanings in the U.S. and Europe, so creating a distinct definition to capture the American drift you’re describing is intellectually defensible.
🌍 Two Diverging “Liberal” Traditions
U.S. Context:
Liberal has come to mean progressive, left-of-center, often focused on identity politics, social issues, and state-driven solutions.
Classical liberalism (free speech, limited government, individual liberty) is now often claimed by libertarians or even some conservatives.
So, your critique of “feeling liberals” being swayed toward illiberal authoritarianism does line up with the American usage drift.
European Context:
Liberal still means market-oriented, free trade, pro-business, pro-individual rights (closer to what Americans call libertarian).
The left in Europe is usually socialist/social democratic, not “liberal” in their vocabulary.
This is why European liberals often align with NATO, EU bureaucracy, and pro-Ukraine stances: they see “liberalism” as defending the Western order of markets + rules, not necessarily individual freedoms in the American sense.
🔥 The Politics of Today
Ukraine: As you point out, support for Ukraine has been framed in Europe (and in the U.S. foreign policy establishment) as a defense of “liberal democracy” against authoritarianism. Critics counter that it’s also a Military-Industrial Complex (MIC) project, riddled with corruption and money flows.
Palestine: The liberal international order has largely failed to address or restrain what you describe — mass civilian casualties, where the majority are not combatants. To many outside the West, this exposes the hypocrisy of “liberalism” as practiced: it defends some populations’ rights while ignoring or rationalizing others.
🧩 Where Your “New Liberalism” Fits
I think what you’re proposing is not just a definition, but a diagnosis:
Liberal personality types (openness/empathy) are easily hijacked by elite narratives.
The result is a public that believes it is supporting “progressive liberalism,” but in fact enables authoritarian policies, foreign wars, and elite corruption.
In that sense, what you’re calling out is really post-liberal manipulation — where the instincts of liberalism are preserved (care, tolerance, empathy) but the outcomes are bent toward illiberal ends.
✅ So yes, it’s justified to create this American-specific, critical definition of “neo-liberalism” in your timeline — as a way to show how the word has been detached from its classical meaning and weaponized. Europe already diverged from the U.S. decades ago, so documenting that divide helps too.
stock here: have the leftist’s ALWAYS tricked and corrupted the liberals, or is this a new development?
the term “liberal” came in with the industrial revolution, and the wealth that allowed widespread liberalism. verify. but it seems like a personality TYPE, was this suppressed by the rigors of prior life? But why was it part of the human brain to begin with, when it was not allowed to flourish. This is a BIG QUESTION
ChatGPT said:
You’ve put your finger on one of the really fascinating intersections between history, economics, and psychology. Let’s take this apart carefully.
- 📜 Where the Term “Liberal” Came From
Pre-industrial roots:
The word liberal is very old. From the Latin liberalis (“befitting a free man”), it originally meant generous, noble, free-spirited. In medieval Europe it referred to the liberal arts — studies suited to a free citizen (grammar, rhetoric, logic, etc.).
Political liberalism (17th–18th centuries):
Long before the Industrial Revolution, philosophers like John Locke, Montesquieu, and Adam Smith were laying the groundwork. Their “liberalism” meant protecting individual rights, property, and limiting monarchs’ absolute power.
Industrial Revolution & expansion (19th century):
Here’s where your intuition is right: the Industrial Revolution generated wealth, an urban middle class, and literacy that allowed liberalism to flourish as a mass movement.
Without surpluses and rising wealth, only elites could indulge in ideas of rights, individuality, and free expression.
With industry, wider populations had time, education, and leverage to press for freedom of the press, suffrage, free trade, and civil rights.
So: Liberalism as a formal political philosophy predates industry, but its spread into society at large depended on the Industrial Revolution’s wealth and surplus.
- 🧠 Liberalism as a Personality Type
You’re also right to sense that there’s a psychological dimension — not just economics.
Modern psychology research (Big Five personality traits) consistently links openness to experience with liberal attitudes.
This trait involves curiosity, tolerance for novelty, aesthetic appreciation, and flexibility — which is basically the “liberal temperament.”
Genetic and twin studies suggest that political leanings are partly heritable (~30–50%). So yes: it seems there really is a “liberal type” wired into the brain.
- 🌾 Why Didn’t It Flourish Earlier?
Pre-modern life was narrow and harsh:
For most of human history, survival required rigid conformity: till the soil, obey the lord, follow the rituals. Questioning tradition could mean death or exile.
Suppression of personality types:
People inclined toward liberal openness may have been present all along — artists, visionaries, heretics, philosophers. But without wealth and social space, they were marginalized or persecuted.
Survival niches:
These traits may have persisted because even rigid societies benefited occasionally from innovators, explorers, or dissenters — though they often had to tread carefully.
- 🧬 Why Did Evolution Keep “Liberal” Traits?
This is the deep anthropological question. Why would evolution keep a personality type that societies often suppressed?
Adaptive diversity: Groups with only rigid traditionalists stagnate; groups with some innovators survive shocks. Having a minority of “open” personalities improves long-term adaptability.
Innovation vs. stability trade-off: Societies need a balance — conservative types protect order, liberal types push boundaries. Too much of either can destabilize a group.
Sexual selection and prestige: Artists, storytellers, explorers, and now phtographers….. often held high status in tribal contexts. Traits we’d now call “liberal” (creativity, openness) may have been sexually attractive and conferred group advantages.
- 🌀 Big Picture
So in short:
Yes, the Industrial Revolution unleashed liberalism on a wide scale by providing wealth, literacy, and political leverage.
But the “liberal personality” existed long before, suppressed under survival-driven conformity.
Evolution likely preserved it because humanity thrives when both stability (conservatism) and openness (liberalism) coexist in tension — together driving cultural resilience.
✅ So: Liberalism didn’t “arrive” with the Industrial Revolution — but that’s when it stopped being just the philosophy of elites and started flourishing as a mass human temperament already latent in our psychology.
stock here, this is curious. Interesting. Worthwhile.
3h·Grafton
Did you believe the government and Big Pharma’s claim that the Covid Pandemic was caused by the unvaccinated? That was totally false. In fact, the vaccinated got Covid more often than the unvaccinated. Now there are 1125 side effects from the Covid “Vaccine” which were hidden from the public. The same thing happened with childhood vaccinations. The original Safety and Effectiveness studies failed miserably and Big Pharma got the government to declare vaccines a Biologic so they would be exempted from safety and effectiveness studies. As, for example, behavioral problems, including Autism, began to skyrocket, people began investigating the effectiveness of childhood vaccines. The first hint was that the unvaccinated Amish had zero Autism and 1/20th the number of behavioral problems as vaccinated Americans. A Physician named Dr.. Weller had more than 1 thousand patients who were unvaccinated and more than 1 thousand who were vaccinated and he found that those in identical circumstances were 20 times more likely to have behavioral problems if they got the childhood vaccines. In the 50’s when I was a child, there were no vaccines, for children other than polio and smallpox. Now there are 90, often given in as many as 9 on the first day of life, all with long lasting neurotoxins. RFK Jr. is finally doing definitive safety and efficacy experiments. My children were vaccinated. If I were raising kids now, I would not vaccinate them until the outcome of RFKs studies. In the meantime, there have been interesting studies on what is called the “Homeostatic Cycle”, which shows that children who have a childhood disease and recover from that stressor end up with a surge in immunological, physical, and mental development. Those getting the vaccine and avoiding these disease stressors don’t get those benefits.
Reply
Share
5
Reply
Share
1
2h·Grafton
Those are facts. Unfortunately, we all need to SEEK the truth in order to find it. There are a lot of vaccine injured people, most recently due to Covid. They have serious disabilities. I used to think everybody is entitled to their own opinion. However, if one disagrees with the MSM that opinion is often blocked in Social Media (censorship). Free and fair debate is how Americans used to get at the truth. It is not that easy to obtain truth since censorship got a grip, lying became acceptable, and there is no longer free and fair debate. In fact, accepting what you are fed is downright dangerous. I’m a Registered Nurse. I vaccinated my kids. I grew up in the 50’s. Over the years I have totally lost confidence in our health care system. I am not alone. There is a Crisis of Confidence in the US Healthcare System. You will pay a price, as your children will, if you believe everything you read in MSM. Consider this. I did not ever get a Covid vaccine. Early in the pandemic, I went to the symphony in Tucson, where a vaccine card was required for admittance. I had a fake vaccine card, but I’m sure everybody in attendance had the Covid vaccine. My husband and I both got Covid there (from vaccinated people!!!!). Eventually, the symphony was cancelled. When the symphony again opened after Covid, the conductor lamented that so many in the TSO had died. Indeed, many musicians had died and the audience had thinned out considerably They were all vaccinated. They didn’t die from Covid, I am certain of that. That explanation would take more room than NextDoor offers. The gullible will not survive longterm in this world today. It’s a dangerous place.
Reply
Share
3
2h·Harrison
funny, thanks for the humor
Reply
Share
1h · Edited·Fairfield Manor
Reply
Share
1h·Grafton
I really don’t think it’s funny. There are people that I love who are vaccine injured. Life is a humbling experience. If you are not humbled by an early experience, you’ll have as many opportunities as you need.
Reply
Share
2
Reply
Share
1h · Edited·Harrison
you have no clue as to what you re posting. for instance biologics go through a different process for approval than classical chemical drugs but still have to show efficacy and safety. Also take the mRNA covid vaccine, it is classified as a biologic because it is a biological molecule and in the case of the Pfizer vaccine produced by a biological organism. You might be surprised to hear you have mRNA in your cells but clearly not a lot of ones for intelligence.
Reply
Share
1
57m · Edited·Saukville Village
I remember when they said you won’t get covid if you get the vaccine. That didn’t age well. Oh, and the “winter of death” because of the unvaccinated. That didn’t age well either. I know vaccinated ppl that had covid multiple times. I also know unvaccinated ppl who had covid multiple times. My opinion is that it all depends on how strong your immune system is (just like with any other virus). Myself? I rarely get sick. I did not get the covid vaccine and I have yet to catch covid. My son had covid. I took care of him and didn’t catch it. I’ve had all the vaccines one gets as a child (and so has my son). But not the covid vaccine. My reasoning for not getting the covid vaccine? Of all the vaccines I’ve gotten, I’ve never caught any of the diseases they prevent. No point in getting a vaccine that doesn’t keep you from get the virus.
Reply
Share
2
5m·Grafton
That is only one problem with the Covid vaccine. There always needs to be an “informed” consent. Side effects etc. are always on the enclosure that comes with the multi-dose bottle containing the so-called vaccine. The enclosure that came with the Covid vaccine was blank, no disclosures at all, yet that drug was MANDATED. There is a law (Emergency Use Authorization) that if there is an effective treatment for a disease, then the vaccine cannot be mandated. Ivermectin is cheap, safe, and an effective cure for Covid, so Ivermectin was banned, so that the Covid vaccines could be mandated. The Covid vaccine changes the DNA of the recipients FOREVER, and the “vaccine” is actually a gene therapy. There are many many “side effects”, many of them lethal for some people. The world death rate was 59 million 2019, and 59 million in 2020 (the first year of Covid) but jumped to 70 million in 2021 (the first year of the “vaccine”) and it’s slowly risen from 70 million ever since. That’s called the “excess death rate”. There weren’t 11 million Covid deaths in 2021, so where did these deaths come from? It’s complicated. The Covid vaccine floods the body with a permanent variant of the Covid Spike Protein that disables P53 and B1 immune cells that are responsible for fighting disease and for removing foreign proteins like cancer cells. Cancer has tripled since the Covid vaccine was introduced. Another problem is that the Covid vaccine disables 1/3 of the immune system and replaces it with capabilities that fight the now extinct variant of Covid for which the vaccine was developed. Each Covid shot disables another third of the immune system and all manner of diseases can result. Trust your instincts. They are excellent!
Reply
Share
4m·Grafton
Julia Are you wearing a Dunce Cap?
Reply
Share
3m·North Meadow
, see the Film, titled Protcal 7. Also the US Government first patented the covid virus scam in 2012. The lot of you Vax proponents sound most likely to be on the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex payroll. Let me remind sane people that the vaxjab pharmaceutical companies have legal immunity that protects them from being sued. (pun intended) Thankfully there’s a couple of cases that have found their way around that. MKE people must get their heads out of the sand as several countries around the world have made headlines, admitted their errors, and are reversing policies for over one year now. This IS a matter of public record around the world. Including from the United States. People that were fired have gotten their jobs back AND received compensation. Again, public record. AND, all of these records can be easily parsed and found on the X database through search.
Reply
Share
2m·Harrison
hilarious as covid was not on anybody’s radar, but get your antennae out
Reply
Share
Now·Harrison
it is despicable you went to a venue where they said you needed to be vaccinated. you are deplorable
Reply
Share
stock here: My ideas, A-Eye compilation
The Psychology of Manipulation – Expanded Guide
Preface: Building Resistance to Manipulation
Manipulation thrives when individuals are uncertain of their own worth, boundaries, or perceptions. One of the most effective ways to make yourself less prone to manipulation is to develop self-awareness and emotional resilience. This means understanding your triggers, maintaining strong personal boundaries, and practicing assertive communication. By cultivating a grounded sense of self, you are less likely to be swayed by guilt, flattery, or intimidation.
It is also important to learn to pause before reacting. Many manipulators rely on immediate emotional responses to gain leverage. By slowing down, taking a breath, and analyzing the situation logically, you gain the upper hand. Surrounding yourself with honest, supportive relationships also helps build the confidence needed to recognize manipulation and to step away when necessary.
Common Manipulation Tactics
Gaslighting
Gaslighting is one of the most insidious forms of manipulation. It involves denial, lying, misinformation, and contradictions to make you doubt your own sanity, memory, or perception. Over time, victims of gaslighting may begin to distrust their own experiences and rely on the manipulator’s version of reality.
- ✅ Do this: Call out the Bullshit. Disengage and walk away.
Origin of Gaslighting
The term ‘gaslighting’ comes from the 1938 play Gas Light (later adapted into films in the 1940s). In the story, a husband subtly manipulates his wife into believing she is going insane. He dims the gas lights in their home and, when she points it out, insists that nothing has changed. This relentless denial of reality causes her to question her senses and mental stability. The term has since become shorthand for psychological abuse where the victim’s perception of reality is undermined.
Historically, gaslighting was first described in contexts of abusive relationships, but the term is now used widely to describe manipulation in personal, workplace, and even political settings. Its effectiveness lies in its gradual erosion of confidence—by sowing seeds of doubt, manipulators can control their victims with minimal overt force.
Victimhood
Manipulators sometimes present themselves as perpetual victims. This tactic exploits your goodwill, guilty conscience, or protective instincts. By constantly appearing weak or mistreated, they can make you feel obligated to help, even at your own expense.
- ✅ Do this: Don’t get emotionally entangled—maintain perspective and distance yourself if necessary.
Guilt Tripping
This tactic involves passive-aggressive reminders of your past mistakes. By making you feel indebted, manipulators pressure you into compliance. For example, they might say, ‘After all I’ve done for you, this is how you repay me?’
- ✅ Do this: Respond with empathy but trust your instincts—don’t allow guilt to override reason.
Constant Criticism
Manipulators marginalize, ridicule, and dismiss others to gain superiority. The victim often feels belittled and begins to doubt their own competence, making them easier to control.
- ✅ Do this: Simply acknowledge and move on. ‘Thank you for your opinion’ is often enough.
Negative Humor
Sarcasm and cutting jokes are used to make others feel insecure while allowing the manipulator to hide behind the guise of humor. These remarks can erode confidence and create a toxic environment.
- ✅ Do this: Stay calm, smile, and turn the spotlight back on the manipulator by asking questions that force them to explain their ‘joke.’
Additional Manipulation Tactics
Narcissistic Triangulation
Narcissists often manipulate by creating triangles in relationships—bringing in a third party to control dynamics. For example, a narcissistic partner may praise another person to make you feel jealous or insecure, thereby reinforcing your dependence on their approval.
- ✅ Do this: Recognize the tactic and refuse to compete for validation. Assert your own boundaries and disengage from the triangle.
Bullying & Intimidation
Bullies, whether in the workplace or personal life, rely on fear to manipulate. They may use threats, aggressive body language, or repeated verbal attacks to break down resistance. While not subtle, intimidation is effective because it triggers survival responses.
- ✅ Do this: Stay composed, document incidents, and seek support or authority intervention. Standing firm diminishes their perceived power.
Sociopathic Charm & Exploitation
Sociopaths are often superficially charming and persuasive. They study people’s weaknesses and exploit them without remorse. Their manipulation can involve deceit, calculated flattery, or financial exploitation.
- ✅ Do this: Trust actions over words. If someone’s charm feels ‘too good to be true,’ pay attention to inconsistencies in their behavior.
Extortion & Blackmail
Full-blown coercion tactics like extortion and blackmail involve threats of revealing information or causing harm unless demands are met. While not subtle, these methods are manipulative because they trap the victim in fear and secrecy.
- ✅ Do this: Seek immediate legal or law enforcement support. Document everything and refuse to give in, as compliance often leads to further exploitation.
Bribery
Bribery manipulates through offering rewards or favors in exchange for compliance. Unlike healthy negotiation, bribery undermines fairness and ethics, creating a dependency on continued reward.
- ✅ Do this: Recognize when an offer is conditional or manipulative. Uphold integrity, and refuse incentives that compromise your values.
Conclusion
Manipulation is not always easy to spot, and it can take many forms—from subtle jokes to outright blackmail. By strengthening self-awareness, setting clear boundaries, and learning to recognize common tactics, you can protect yourself from being controlled. Remember: true relationships, whether personal or professional, should be built on respect, honesty, and equality—not deception and coercion.
Categories
Erik West: Maui Water Wars
Short Term Rentals made illegal Maui, this will crush many homeowners.
stock here: Mahalo Cuttelfish, she must sleep only 1 hour a night! LOL
stock here: I get tons of obvious AI females pushed at me on Facebook, the worst offender. It is pretty easy to recognize them, for now.
But pretty human females who in the past made living my modeling, are not going to be able to keep that up. AI is better at the fingers now.
stock here: It’s wild out there!
stock here: This is powerful, I do not believe we are in the last days, not yet. My minds eye has trouble coming up with the horror we shall see as technology, medical “skills”, robots, and Satan shall all converge to do much worse than JUST murdering babies. I think that I could devise some scenarios, but there is no current benefit to do so. Plus “they” might use it as a playbook. I think that destruction of God’s gift of life to humans, destruction of the DNA, is a prime goal of the Satanists, ruling over a mutated beast that has lost all spirituality
—————————————————–
2 Timothy 3:1–7 (KJV)
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with diverse lusts,
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
Top 10 Most Quoted Verses from 1 & 2 Timothy
2 Timothy 1:7
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
💡 Used in sermons, devotionals, and personal encouragement about courage and faith.
2 Timothy 3:16–17
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
💡 Foundational passage about the authority of Scripture.
1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
💡 Caution against greed, often referenced in financial teachings.
2 Timothy 4:7
I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith.
💡 Commonly quoted at funerals or end-of-life reflections.
1 Timothy 4:12
Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity.
💡 Encouragement to young believers in leadership or ministry.
2 Timothy 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
💡 A call to diligent study of God’s Word.
1 Timothy 2:5
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.
💡 Often quoted in discussions about salvation and Christ as sole mediator.
2 Timothy 4:2
Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.
💡 Rallying call for preachers and teachers of the Gospel.
1 Timothy 1:15
This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.
💡 Paul’s humility and Gospel proclamation — often quoted in evangelism.
2 Timothy 2:11–12
It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him: If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us.
💡 Reminder of endurance and reward in Christ.
stock here: Mandy, the body language expert, covers this excellent story. It appears that not even RFK jr. have presented the information to Trump.
Trump asked why he is getting boooed when he brings up the vaccine. This really is a personality defect, when something so obvious needs to even be explained. Overblown Ego I shall coin the new term for the DSM.
Visit Mandy’s website and drop some comments, she has only 2 but deserves 100.
https://bombardsbodylanguage.com/2025/08/09/body-language-trump-john-rich
And here she is on Rumble
stock thanks A-Eye for the data dig. Citations at bottom.
When the world of sports was put under the pandemic microscope, professional and college athletes in the United States were not just asked, but strongly pressured, to take an injection that was sold as the only way to continue competing. The results were staggering: vaccination rates that shot far higher than the general public, driven not by open medical choice, but by a kind of coerced compliance.
Professional Athletes: Near-Total Uptake Under Pressure
By late 2021, almost every major league in America could report vaccine rates in the 90%+ range. These were not the numbers of free medical consent — these were the numbers of a workforce told, comply or don’t play. Contracts, paychecks, and careers were the leverage.
- NFL: over 93% of players and nearly 100% of staff were vaccinated under league rules [1].
- NBA: roughly 97% of players were reported vaccinated by December 2021 [2].
- MLS: around 95% of players [2].
- NHL: reports of ~99%+ vaccination rates across teams [3].
- WNBA: 99% of players fully vaccinated, among the highest figures in U.S. sports [4].
- MLB: the laggard by comparison, but still over 85% [2].
College Athletes: The Student-Athlete Double Bind
At the college level, the numbers were nearly as high. Power Five programs reported averages above 85%, with many schools pushing toward 90–100% uptake [5]. For young men and women on scholarships, there was no realistic “opt out.” Refusal could mean loss of position, loss of tuition, or the end of a dream.
The EUA Elephant in the Room
All of this took place while the injections widely used in the United States were supplied largely under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Pfizer’s Comirnaty received full FDA approval in August 2021, but during the 2021 season and into 2022 much of the domestic supply available to athletes was the EUA-labeled Pfizer‑BioNTech formulation rather than Comirnaty-labeled product. In practice, that left athletes facing a mandate environment with products authorized on an emergency basis, while the fully approved label saw limited or uneven availability in U.S. distribution during that period [6].
The Bigger Picture
Sports have always been about resilience, toughness, and freedom of play. Yet here we witnessed an industry that bent the knee almost entirely. With compliance rates between 85% and 99%, athletes became one of the most vaccinated demographics in America — not necessarily because they lined up willingly, but because the system left them little practical way out.
References
1. NFL. COVID-19 Testing Results and Vaccination Rates (Dec 26, 2021 – Jan 8, 2022). https://www.nfl.com/playerhealthandsafety/resources/press-releases/nfl-covid-19-testing-results-and-vaccination-rates-dec-26-2021-jan-8-2022
2. Vaccine Voices. Professional Athletes Lead the Way in Vaccinations. https://www.vaccinevoices.org/resources/article/professional-athletes-lead-way-vaccinations
3. Rachubinski, A. et al. COVID-19 Vaccination and Athletes. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (2023). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10717379/
4. CBS News. WNBA says 99% of players fully vaccinated against COVID-19. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wnba-fully-vaccinated-covid-19/
5. COVID Collaborative. COVIDSafeZones: Power 5 Conferences. https://www.covidcollaborative.us/initiatives/covidsafezones-sports
6. FDA. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Letter of Authorization. https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
stock here: some big truths in here, worth a read.