Stock here: I had AI summarize the transcript: Below. One of her Jamaican ancestors was a White Slave Owner Male, Hamilton Brown who had a Daughter with an unknown female (probably a slave), that Daughter was Christiana Brown. Hamilton Brown had 1120 Slaves.
This female’s family history is just odd. Remember when she couldn’t get even 1% support when she tried to “run for president”? She is extremely unlikeable.
In the video you’re referring to, Candace Owens discusses a complex investigation into Kamala Harris’s family history, particularly focusing on her father Donald J. Harris and his lineage. Owens claims discrepancies in the official narrative regarding Harris’s family, including multiple documents and certificates related to Kamala’s grandparents and her father’s early life. Key points in the video include:
Timeline Issues: Owens suggests that Donald Harris’s family background may involve multiple marriages and confusing records. She points out that his mother, Barl Harris, had different records showing her as single during the birth of Donald, yet married shortly after to Lawford Newland.
Death Certificates and Family Anomalies: Owens presents a theory that Barl Harris may have lost a child named Donald in 1940, only two years after his birth, based on a death certificate found in St. Ann Parish, Jamaica. This raises questions about Kamala Harris’s father’s identity, as this “Donald Harris” could potentially not be the same person.
Inconsistent Documentation: Owens emphasizes the difficulty in finding consistent marriage, birth, and death records, which leads her to speculate on possible family secrets, including the early death of Kamala’s paternal grandmother and the involvement of Barl Christie in these mysterious events.
Cultural and Familial Terms: Owens remarks on how Donald Harris refers to his mother as “Miss Barl” and his grandmother as “Miss Krishy,” interpreting this as an unusual and formal way of addressing close family members. She questions the authenticity of Harris’s portrayal of his family heritage.
Kamala Harris’s Background: Owens suggests that Kamala Harris’s emphasis on her Black and Jamaican heritage is politically motivated, given her majority Indian and White ancestry. She scrutinizes her father’s Communist ties and questions whether Harris’s public narrative aligns with verifiable facts about her family.
Throughout the video, Owens highlights potential inconsistencies and suggests further scrutiny into the narrative presented by Kamala Harris and her father. The overarching theme is Owens’s skepticism about the portrayal of Kamala Harris’s family history and the legitimacy of the details provided.
————————– A-Eye provided
Kamala Harris’s racial background is a mix of Indian and Jamaican heritage, and we can trace her lineage up to the great-grandparents level as follows:
Father’s Side (Jamaican heritage):
Donald J. Harris, Kamala’s father, is of Afro-Jamaican descent, though there are complexities in his lineage. Donald Harris himself has written that his paternal grandmother, (Christiana Brown) Miss Chrishy, was a descendant of a slave owner, specifically Hamilton Brown, a prominent British plantation owner and slave trader in Jamaica. This means that Kamala’s paternal ancestors likely include both enslaved people and white slave owners. Donald’s paternal grandfather, Joseph Alexander Harris, was a landowner and agricultural exporter in Jamaica, adding some middle-class standing to the family background.
Mother’s Side (Indian heritage):
Shyamala Gopalan, Kamala’s mother, was an Indian Tamil woman born in Chennai (formerly Madras), India. Her family hails from Tamil Nadu in South India. Kamala’s maternal grandfather, P.V. Gopalan, was a high-ranking Indian civil servant. Her maternal grandmother was Rajam Gopalan. Summary to the Great-Grandparent Level: Paternal side (Jamaican): A mix of Afro-Jamaican and likely white (through the Hamilton Brown lineage). Maternal side (Indian): South Indian Tamil heritage, specifically from Tamil Nadu. Kamala Harris is thus of African, Indian, and some European descent through her great-grandparents.
Well I’ve looked at her family tree (via genealogy online. Don’t know how accurate it is) and her family are white Irish and (further back) British people on both sides. Her father’s grandmother Ms Chrishy is the granddaughter of Hamilton Brown who was an Irish slave owner in st Ann, Jamaica and Brown’s town is named after him. Donald, Kamala’s father (in his memoir) showed an image of Ms Chrishy that looked like a light skinned black woman or mixed but going by the genealogy/ancestry of both of her parents, she was full white. Her husband was white too so her son oscar must have been white and Beryl Finigan’s ancestry is pure white too. Maybe Beryl had an affair with a mixed race man and got pregnant with Donald and Oscar accepted him as his own. Kamala has only a teaspoon of black in her gene pool. She’s predominantly white Irish and Indian. Her Jamaican family are from high society, owned slaves and were extremely wealthy. In fact, Hamilton Brown was very upset that slavery was abolished. Her family ruled over black people, they were not black people.
The truth is it has been tried and failed grandiosely in the Soviet Union. What you see now in China is nothing like what he envisioned either.
Why do American Jacobins and Marxists hate Russia so much? Because it is no longer a Marxist distopea and it is the place where the Marxist experiment failed magnificently. They can’t stand that. There f-ck buddy Neocon pals just can’t stand a strong state rival of any kind and need to put taxpayer bread on their tables.
Why are these new Marxists happy to join together with murderers? The deal is you control the American people we control the rest of the world. One big happy club.
The big show about saving Palestinians is just that, a big disingenuous woke moron circus act. If the squad and its minions really cared they would do something about it. But how would they then pay for their Teslas and beach houses?
What of the Euro Marxists? More resentment that it failed in the Soviet Union. They forget, however, that were it not for the Russians, they would all be French or German serfs. And ironically, that is essentially what they are now. Europe is one big ideological concentration camp. But they are too busy Schwabbing their anal rainbow green orifices to realize it.
stock here: The Crisis was NOT just butt headed Russians trying to be difficult…..but now this makes the Cuban Crisis even more analogous to the Ukraine Debacle.
Russians stationed their missiles in Cuba, Khrushchev didn’t just come up with a great plan to start a nuclear missiles crisis in Cuba. He was looking for a opportunity to get even with the US for placing nukes in Turkey. So when Fidel Castro asked Khrushchev for help that’s when Khrushchev saw opportunity to get even with the US, and have the Nukes removed from Turkey. Khrushchev was successful in that regard. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT The comment about the Cuban Missile Crisis on QH is essentially accurate. Here’s a breakdown of the relevant facts with further verification and expansion:
Background: U.S. Missiles in Turkey In 1961, the United States deployed Jupiter nuclear missiles in Turkey, just 150 miles from the Soviet Union. This deployment was a key factor that angered Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, who saw it as a direct threat to Soviet security. The U.S. had stationed these missiles as part of NATO’s defense strategy, but their proximity to Soviet borders made the situation tense. The Jupiter missiles in Turkey were capable of striking major Soviet cities with little warning.
Soviet Response: Missiles in Cuba In response, Khrushchev sought to balance the strategic playing field by placing Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba, just 90 miles from the U.S. This move was partly an attempt to protect the newly established communist regime of Fidel Castro, who had asked Khrushchev for military assistance. However, the placement of the missiles in Cuba also provided the Soviets with a way to retaliate against the U.S. presence in Turkey and equalize the threat level.
The Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) The discovery of the Soviet missiles in Cuba led to a 13-day standoff between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which is now known as the Cuban Missile Crisis. U.S. President John F. Kennedy and his administration considered the missiles a grave threat and demanded their removal, leading to a potential nuclear confrontation between the two superpowers.
Secret Deal: Removal of U.S. Missiles from Turkey Khrushchev did not initiate the Cuban Missile Crisis just to provoke the U.S.; he was indeed seeking to counter the U.S. missile threat in Turkey. The crisis ended when both sides reached a secret agreement. In exchange for the removal of Soviet missiles from Cuba, Kennedy privately agreed to remove U.S. Jupiter missiles from Turkey. However, this part of the deal was not made public at the time to avoid appearing weak to NATO allies or the American public.
Conclusion: Khrushchev’s Strategic Move Khrushchev was indeed successful in his goal to have the U.S. missiles removed from Turkey, but it came at a cost. The Soviet Union had to withdraw its missiles from Cuba, and the event was widely seen as a strategic defeat for the Soviets, despite the secret success in Turkey. The crisis, however, resulted in improved communication between the superpowers, such as the establishment of the Moscow-Washington hotline, to prevent future escalations.
The documentary may not have mentioned the missile deployment in Turkey, but it was a crucial part of the narrative leading to the Cuban Missile Crisis, as Khrushchev was acting to counter the American threat in his region.
This expanded view captures the full context of Khrushchev’s actions, aligning with the QH comment’s core points.
Democratic presidential candidate U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris waits to speak at a campaign rally at United Auto Workers Local 900 on August 8, 2024 in Wayne, Michigan. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
OAN Guest Commentary – Kenin M. Spivak Wednesday, September 18, 2024
To remake America, progressives have centered on a strategy of rewriting history, distorting current events, changing language, and using false allegations of disinformation, malinformation (facts progressives believe are presented out of context), and racism to censor and suppress centrists and conservatives.
By undermining confidence in American values, progressives have considerably advanced their efforts. They have controlled the White House and at least one House of Congress for 12 of the last 16 years, and the Supreme Court for nearly all of the last 70 years. Almost all major media outlets and reporters are in lockstep with progressive goals, lies, and omissions. Most report only about events and views that benefit the progressive agenda, and mischaracterize or suppress news, information, and opinions that may impede it. Progressives also control most federal agencies, many state agencies, leading universities, school boards, professional organizations such as the American Medical Association and the American Bar Association, most leading think tanks, and many corporate boards.
As the COVID pandemic raged, progressives spoke hopefully of a new world order in which experts would tell us how to live. Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, along with Secretary of State Antony Blinken, often refer to this chaos as the “rules-based international order.” They and other progressives, including Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, see the U.S. as just one among many countries. That is why they oppose immigration controls, support global compacts, subordinate the United States to the United Nations, and believe the U.S. can use economic or military power only when supported by an international coalition.
In a recent article for RealClearPolicy about progressives’ crude ad hominem attacks on conservatives, I explained that progressive dogma is a fierce, culturally Marxist philosophy that: (1) demands all policies, resources, and opportunities be allocated in accordance with a benighted view of oppressors and victims centered on race, sex, and sexual orientation; (2) believes children are wards of the state to be indoctrinated by educators, while physically cared for by parents; (3) represses religion for being what Karl Marx described as “the opium of the people;” and (4) places a green agenda, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), and the rights of criminals above free speech and assembly, the judicial process, and rights of petition. Progressives deny that ISIS and Hamas are terrorists, oppose Israel’s right of defense because Jews are “oppressors,” and believe children may select irreversible gender reassignment surgery without parental consent.
To achieve their goals, progressives must overcome deeply held American beliefs in individual freedom, merit, hard work, and pride in their country.
Curricula based on The 1619 Project, which “aims to reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery…at the very center of the United States’ national narrative,” Critical Race Theory (CRT), which teaches that all whites are guilty of bias, and Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria (ESG), which features progressive doctrine on DEI, climate change, and workers’ rights, has been infused into K-12 schools through action civics.
The National Association of Scholars has identified at least 45 state-level education standards in 25 states that incorporate these radical expressions of anti-American animus. Departments of education, accreditation agencies, university administrations, professional licensing organizations, and teachers unions mandate ideological training and DEI goals, and then coerce compliance as a condition of employment, promotion, and appointment to governing boards. Last year, the State Department announced that it will condition promotions and raises on an employee’s loyalty to DEI.
Eliminating or distorting teaching about Western civilization, American exceptionalism, and liberty leaves students uninformed about America’s unique story. An Echelon Insights poll highlights the cumulative impact of this indoctrination. Sixty-six percent of high schoolers viewed the U.S. as exceptional and unique, compared to 47% of college students; 63% of high-schoolers were proud of the U.S., compared to 40% of college students; and 58% of high-schoolers were patriotic, compared to just 35% of college students.
Concurrently, progressives are remaking the acceptable lexicon. They corrupt language and norms to deprive us of the ability to express nuance and understand distinctions.
Leading institutions, including government agencies, professionalorganizations, and universities, proclaim that our language is replete with hidden racism and genderism that must be cleansed with a new vocabulary featuring ideologically-laden phrases. Among the words that trouble the American Medical Association are “disadvantaged,” “equality,” and “disparities.” The politically acceptable terms are “historically and intentionally excluded,” “equity,” and “inequities.” Similarly, “ex-con” or “felon” are to be replaced with “returning citizen” or “persons with a history of incarceration,” and “fairness” with “social justice.”
“Illegal alien,” the term used in federal law for those who enter the U.S. without proper visas or overstay their visas, first became “undocumented alien” and then “non-citizens,” who somehow deserve all benefits to which citizens are entitled.
The American Dream of “equality” is replaced by “equity.” Instead of seeking fair opportunities, we are to seek outcomes in which so-called marginalized minorities receive benefits at least in proportion to their percentage of the relevant population. According to Ibram X. Kendi, if a person embraces DEI and allocates opportunities by race, he is “anti-racist;” otherwise, he is racist. Whites cannot be the victims of racism, because only members of marginalized minorities can be victims. Over the last several years, dictionary definitions of racism have been stealth edited to conform to this new paradigm.
“Infrastructure” has always meant roads, buildings, bridges, and the like. But progressives have implausibly expanded that term to include paid leave, child care, and caregiving. They falsely described the Biden-Harris $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan as an emergency COVID stimulus plan, even though 90% of the plan had nothing to do with COVID.
Contrary to the Associated Press’s adoption in 2015 of “they” as a singular pronoun, there are only two biological sexes, and an individual has never been a “they.” Just 0.6% of Americans identify as transgender. Yet, insisting there are only two sexes is now hate speech. Multiple professors have sued to retain the right to properly address their students. Columbia University threatens to terminate employees who don’t bow to the fiction that there are multiple genders, and the Biden-Harris Administration allows an “x” to be used as a gender on a passport.
In the wake of Donald Trump’s selection of three conservative Supreme Court justices, progressives advocated court packing by increasing the number of justices. They justified doing so by falsely asserting that Trump’s selection of justices based on their political leanings also was court packing. Dictionary.com changed its definition of court packing to “the practice of changing the number or composition of judges on a court, making it more favorable to particular goals or ideologies, and typically involving an increase in the number of seats on the court.” Here, “typically” supplants “always,” which is the threshold condition of court packing. Selecting justices based on their views is not court packing—it is what all presidents do. This is not mere semantics. This is a ploy intended to overcome the opposition of majorities of voters in both parties.
As progressives erase and change language, history, and values to create a foundation to change America’s way of life, they also corruptly fabricate, suppress, and misrepresent recent and current events to confuse voters, shield accountability for their failures, and disparage their opponents. The following is a list of recent political hoaxes promoted by progressive elected officials, bureaucrats, and major national media (my thanks to Breitbart News for identifying many of these):
Hiding Biden’s cognitive impairment took dozens, if not hundreds, of staff, family, elected officials, and reporters. That hoax was revealed only when replacing Biden became imperative to defeat Trump. In lockstep, the progressive media complex abandoned its cover-up of Biden’s impairment and called for his replacement.
Harris’s and Tim Walz’s campaign became the second act of this hoax. With few exceptions, they refuse to discuss their records or beliefs, and falsely claim to have changed both. They willfully misstate Trump’s positions and falsely attribute to him sponsorship of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 (yet another hoax, as even USA Today and CNN have acknowledged).
A complicit media purports to fact check Trump, but seldom checks Harris or Walz. During the candidates’ debate last week, ABC’s moderators checked Trump in real time on six occasions (at least two of which were wrong), but never checked Harris, who repeatedly made false statements. Since then, a few mainstream media outlets have acknowledged some of Harris’s misstatements, though most give her the benefit of the doubt while blasting Trump for every imprecision or contentious assertion.
When the New Yorker’s fact checker, Susan Glasser, was caught pretending that Harris had never spoken in favor of taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgery for illegal aliens, rather than correct her article, she claimed that she intended to question “the political advisability of bringing up these things in a national debate.”
As Harris runs from her record, the media often scolds Republicans for pointing that out, or for tying her to the Biden-Harris Administration. That went too far even for White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who explained that Harris has been a full partner in administration policies. And, last week, The New Republic reported that “much” of the new issues section on the Harris-Walz campaign website was lifted from Biden’s campaign website.
Though conservatives may win an occasional battle, there should be no illusions about the power and effectiveness of progressive deceptions, or the arc of recent history. After the Supreme Court’s ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, and the strong consumer opposition to Bud Light’s woke capitalism, opponents of DEI won a few battles, but DEI is simply going underground with a name change. Some states have rolled back genital mutilation of children, men in girls’ sports, and CRT in schools, while other states and the Biden-Harris Administration have gone in the other direction.
More than 90 corporate leaders have endorsed Harris—who strongly supports DEI, reparations, increasing corporate taxes, taxing unearned income, censorship, and the full range of progressive policies. If she wins, the pendulum will swing strongly to progressive victories, as America moves ever-closer to an Orwellian dystopia.
Any conservative who believes that progressives have ethical limits is naïve. If conservatives have any hope of changing course, Republicans will need to win the presidency, control of both houses of Congress, gubernatorial elections, and state legislatures. To do so in November, and then to keep winning, conservatives must understand the ruthlessness and entrenched power of progressives, and must respond with equal or superior tactics. Marquess of Queensberry rules won’t do.
Kenin M. Spivak is founder and chairman of SMI Group LLC, an international consulting firm and investment bank. He is the author of fiction and non-fiction books and has served as a director and C-suite officer of public and private companies. Spivak has written for National Review, the National Association of Scholars, and Huffington Post. He was chairman of the Editorial Board of the Knowledge Exchange Business Encyclopedia, and a long-time director of the RAND Corporation Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance. He received his A.B., M.B.A., and J.D. from Columbia University.
stock here: there are 4 or 5 of these pages. They pretend to be “caring” but they are all about promoting the lies. All these pages have effectively censored ME. Although others are “getting through” with FACT.
There were no warnings, remember-the island alarm was not turned on, no cell phone service, no tv warnings, water supply turned off, no military called out to help evacuate, police stopped evacuating vehicles from leaving-try that in any small town and see how many survive-Govenor and Maui Mayor hiding the real death count but Maui teachers know with all of the workers forced to sign an affidavit that they would not share what they saw or how many chared bodies they recovered including 2 boat captains, one recovering over 200 and another over 100 in the ocean themselves. All streets were closed off from families wanting to look for their families especially children who were sent home earlier in the day. No Press or family or owners of property were allowed in and all of Lahaina was fenced in with a black material for no viewing-no one was even allowed to look in from a higher viewpoint under threat of arrest
8/08/23 in Lāhainā was NOT a “natural” disaster, as it was genocidal arson. Although Occupied by them, Hawai’i is NOT located in or annexed to USA. Never was & never will be. High winds that day in Lāhainā was NOT due only to Hurricane Dora, as she was 500+ miles to the south of Hawai’
J Roselani Baricuatro-Kanīnau I thought it was odd too since she was far away. Actually 800 miles, (note the number . I saw her on my weather app few days before and because she was so far and super dry (there was very little rain associated associated the storm) and wondered why everyone was hyping it up. However what I learned is there was a low pressure zone south east and a highpressure zone (typicall that zone is always there) and the combo of the two zones sucked the winds from storm toward us while increasing the natural speed of the storm winds. My questions are how often to these types of storms happen and just doesn’t come close enough to us, did the storm create the low pressure zone (I didn’t track the storm before it got closer to us), and is there a chance this storm and it’s path was artificially generated.
stock here: How do the normies keep on doing it. A totally captured liberal friend was planning a trip to Italy, so she thought getting a booster would be good. Then a week later she got COVID. Not a close enough friend to “end the friendship”, LOL almost, and inform her of the truth about the mRNA experiment.
Obviously main stream media is not covering the excess deaths and lack of fertility, decreasing life spans. Has no one noticed the vast increase in Zombie drivers? I am on guard everytime I drive, and pretty much see at least one Zombie in say, 10 miles. Did anyone notice their car insurance up double digits?
Mark Crispin Miller has worked tirelessly to expose the Injections…..
Since “vaccination” started, 91 rappers (that we know of) have “died suddenly” worldwide, with another 13 sickened
For this toll, the hip-hop world can thank Kamala Harris, Spike Lee, Tyler Perry, Whoopi Goldberg, Oprah Winfrey and all their peers who joined the push to get black people jabbed
Do a Google search on “DMX death COVID vaccine,” and here’s what you’ll see first: “Fact check: No evidence DMX’s heart attack was caused by COVID-19 vaccine” (USA Today); “No evidence rapper DMX had COVID-19 vaccine before his death” (Full Fact); “No, the COVID Vaccine Didn’t Kill DMX” (Dallas Observer); “Fact-check: Did DMX receive a COVID-19 vaccine before his death?” asks Politifact, which calls the story “false.” “Did DMX Take COVID-19 Vaccine Days Before Heart Attack,” asks Snopes. “We wouldn’t consider an unnamed source from a gossip site as a reliable source of information.”
Those are among the more restrained denials that DMX’s death had anything to do with his injection. Others went beyond purporting to “debunk” a (putatively) baseless claim to casting all those sharing it online as a Fifth Column of “far-right” extremists—a war-whoop vented with disturbing zeal by faux-left propaganda mills affiliated with the Democratic Party (Big Pharma). “Far-right accounts use DMX’s death to baselessly fearmonger about COVID-19 vaccines,” shrills Media Matters. (“Some people keep trying to overlap any negative health event with the vaccines [sic],” fumes the subhead.) “Far-right Extremists Unite to Peddle COVID-19 Vaccine Disinformation,” warns Right Wing Watch (“A project of People for the American Way”): “From QAnon adherents to full-blown white supremacists, far-right extremists appear to be uniting in their quest to undermine the COVID-19 vaccine.”
stock here: This guy is good, I think he can play 5D chess.
The statement “They aren’t trying to fool you, they are instructing you” seems to suggest a belief that major institutions, media, or political powers are not necessarily hiding the truth, but are instead shaping public opinion and behavior in specific ways. This is not about deception in the conventional sense but more about subtle conditioning and manipulation through the dissemination of selective information or framing of narratives.
Potential Meanings: Guiding Public Discourse: The comment implies that mainstream media or authoritative bodies (like government institutions) set the boundaries for public discourse. They provide instructions on what topics should be focused on and how they should be discussed, rather than presenting a full, unbiased view.
Framing Reality: It suggests that the content you consume (whether from media or other sources) is designed to frame reality in a particular way, shaping public perceptions rather than outright lying. This might be about controlling narratives around political candidates, policies, or social issues.
Social and Institutional Pressure: The idea here is that even if people are aware of certain truths or contradictions in the information they receive, they may not act on that knowledge because of potential social or professional consequences. The “instructions” are about maintaining conformity to acceptable opinions or actions.
This line of thinking often arises in discussions about media bias, control of political narratives, and how public perception is shaped by powerful institutions. It aligns with theories about how modern political and media systems manage dissent and maintain control over populations by setting the limits on what is acceptable to think, say, or do in society.
stock here: “These people are people, they are within our realm”
harmonic mind control operations….et al
– Ask yourself why are they investigating P Diddy , but never investigated Bill and Hillary Clinton with these very SERIOUS allegation from Cathy O’Brien .. pic.twitter.com/Yw0eGw3VnI
stock here: we had a family email chain going on, with California lib / lefty girls saying “do the right thing” and vote Harris. I haven’t done it yet, but had the thought to say “why do they have to lie about just about everything”?
“They don’t lie about anything, Trump goes out of his way to lie.” would be the response, without a minute of introspection. Thoughts appreciated. It seems the amount of people that can actually change their opinion, is maybe 3%, prove me wrong.
But this article is about Nuzzi, who I didn’t know her name until today. But the connection to RFK is curious. Noted in last months visit to Madison I met with RFKs people, and schooled them on a few things that they were genuinely interested in, such as safe modern food production. And they were dead set on introducing me to RFK when he came to Wisconsin, LOL. He’s tough, can bench quite a bit, can do 20 “cheat” pullups, but he does TRT which means your body will never make it again, but he is also 70, so maybe that’s a good strategy.
I just got an Instagram and Twitter last week so I could keep tabs on a broader range of stories.
Olivia Nuzzi, 31 (everyone is saying 29….intentional mistake to make her “relationship” with RFK even more weird), Author at NY Magazine, is now suspended because of a “non-physical” relationship with RFK Junior. What the hell kind of story is that?
Is this a hit job on married RFK, in order to be a hit job on Trump. Nuzzi’s instagram page is still up, and lot’s of people are attacking her there, which is odd.
I thought this one supportive comment was pretty cool……
Olivia. You’ve been through a lot, losing parents, a painful breakup…sometimes you have to break shit. Sometimes you break yourself. You will come out of this stronger and wiser. There is lots of love and support and understanding out here for you. Keep going. Don’t over explain. You will survive this.
Maybe she did this just for name recognition. Maybe she “sexted” to RFK just to create this situation now. But it seems a 2 year engagement just ended, so that is unlikely if this was just a setup, I mean a lefty should be OK with your fiance sending nude pictures as long as it meant a small defeat for Trump? It sure is curious. It this a one and done, or is there more to it.
To her credit, AK Rep. Mary Peltola voted with Republicans to pass the legislation. If you want to see more votes in support of common sense, tell Mary good on her.
To their ultimate shame, 158 Democrats opposed passage and voted against the best interests of Americans. In the process, these Democrats have repudiated their oaths of office. Is it too soon to call them enemies of the state? Quislings? Their votes expose rot in foundation timbers.
stock here: I have reduced literal cash holdings, as I wanted to be able to be more nimble and do things like hold foreign dividend generating “stocks” in the home currency. With all that, the study of the elephant in the room, the USD is important.
————————————————– A-Eye
The charts shown in the image represent the currency pairs relative to the U.S. dollar (USD), Euro (EUR), Japanese Yen (JPY), British Pound (GBP), Canadian Dollar (CAD), Swiss Franc (CHF), Australian Dollar (AUD), and New Zealand Dollar (NZD). These charts are common in financial platforms like Finviz to track currency price movements in real-time, usually through candlestick charts that display open, high, low, and closing prices over a specified period.
Nature of Currency Representations: The charts show the relative strength or weakness of these currencies against one another, typically in terms of their exchange rates to the USD or to another major currency. These rates are determined in the global foreign exchange (Forex) market, where currencies are bought and sold.
Each chart shows the movement of one currency relative to another, such as USD vs. EUR or GBP vs. USD, and is based on market supply and demand for those currencies. Traders use these charts to speculate on price movements, hedge against risks, or perform arbitrage.
On DXY and Its Limitations:
The DXY (U.S. Dollar Index) is a measure of the value of the U.S. dollar relative to a basket of six major world currencies:
Euro (EUR) – 57.6% weight Japanese Yen (JPY) – 13.6% weight British Pound (GBP) – 11.9% weight Canadian Dollar (CAD) – 9.1% weight Swedish Krona (SEK) – 4.2% weight Swiss Franc (CHF) – 3.6% weight The issue you pointed out about DXY not being fully representative of the U.S.’s true trading relationships is valid. This is due to several factors:
Eurocentric Bias: The Euro has a disproportionate weight in the index (around 57%), while major U.S. trading partners, such as China (with the Yuan), Mexico, and other Asian and Latin American countries, are not included in the DXY. Volume and Notional Value: The DXY does not reflect the actual volume of currency traded or the notional value of global transactions in relation to the U.S. dollar. For example, the Chinese Yuan (CNY) is one of the largest trading currencies globally due to the sheer size of U.S.-China trade, yet it is not part of the DXY.
Outdated Basket: The DXY basket was created decades ago, and while the currencies included were significant trading partners at the time, global trade patterns have shifted significantly since then.
Alternative Metrics: To address the limitations of the DXY, other more comprehensive indexes have been developed:
Trade-Weighted U.S. Dollar Index: This is a broader measure, including more currencies weighted by the amount of trade the U.S. does with each country. It offers a more accurate reflection of the U.S. dollar’s performance relative to its actual trading partners.
Bespoke Currency Baskets: Financial institutions may also create custom indexes to track the U.S. dollar against a basket of currencies based on trade flows, GDP, or other economic indicators, to better reflect economic realities.
Conclusion:
The Finviz currency charts give traders and analysts an intuitive way to track price movements, but broader measures like the DXY can sometimes be misleading due to their outdated structure. Modern tools such as the Trade-Weighted Index offer a more precise reflection of the U.S. dollar’s real position in global trade.
. I saw her on my weather app few days before and because she was so far and super dry (there was very little rain associated associated the storm) and wondered why everyone was hyping it up. However what I learned is there was a low pressure zone south east and a highpressure zone (typicall that zone is always there) and the combo of the two zones sucked the winds from storm toward us while increasing the natural speed of the storm winds. My questions are how often to these types of storms happen and just doesn’t come close enough to us, did the storm create the low pressure zone (I didn’t track the storm before it got closer to us), and is there a chance this storm and it’s path was artificially generated.
