Month: January 2022
Operation Crimson Mist & the Coming Genocide by VAXXED Mind-Controlled Zombies
stock here: Sorry this article is not up to standards, but the idea is there in the Title, some big things may happen in this week or next. Including a large false flag to deflect attention. The first link no longer works, imagine that. Also noted the “greatawakening” site, which had good info but was still pimping the Q stuff, has been snuffed out.
I would say what could happen now, Could be called PHASE 2, With all of the other preparatory “work” as PHASE 1. I think it is that big, so stay frosty.
This is my first day back in full operation after a literal operation on Monday, so I have real things to really get done. So far so good on the operation recovery, its a net positive thing, not fixing a disease. See next article that the Jab is disproportionately killing off the 25 to 44 year age group at much higher rates than other age groups.
A US judge ordered Pfizer to release the results of their v@x in 1st 90 days of the US. 1,223 deaths & over 40,000 adverse effects (some of which were permanent & disabling). Again, Pfizer’s own data – 1,223 deaths w/in 90 days in the US. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/upl
I’ll add more if I can, got actual work that must get done!
What have these monthly death rates done in the last critical 5 months, after young people have been widely Vxx’d?
Original Idea came from Jim Stone, I did not check his numbers, just ran my own.
http://82.221.129.208/1/.tr3.html
————————————————————-
I’ll do the Abstract first….33% increase in death, 2019 to 2022. CDC is losing control of the narrative, they are at the end of their rope in covering up the Vax caused deaths and morbidity. So they start changing the narrative just lately to kind of cover their tracks. The huge increases in death are in the 25-34 YO, and 35-44 year old groups. These are the groups that I warned “The younger you are, the more insane you are to take the vaccine”. Its an odd effect though that I didn’t expect, Until it was plotted.
Data Source
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/AH-Monthly-Provisional-Counts-of-Deaths-by-Age-Gro/ezfr-g6hf
Above, the toddlers death rate went down because birth rate went down, probably fertility too.
Below, the old people were dying anyway
Below is not my opinion, simply cut and paste, but it supports the “narrative change” of CDC FDA of last week, I will say this….the recent rise of Sky News Australia was “curious”, and I label them controlled opposition. They will pretend to go against the leftists, but when the chips are down, they are owned by the leftists and they will sing a different tune when it matters the most. Australia is pretty much toast at this time. Cheech out.
Kit Knightly – Off-Guardian Jan 10, 2022 [Excerpts]
The past few days, even weeks, have seen a definite alteration in the media’s attitude to the Covid “pandemic”.
There have been numerous examples of what, if the media were not so tightly controlled, might be referred to as “dissent”. But, since the media is tightly controlled, we must call it an apparent change in the message.
A few days ago Dr Rochelle Walensky, the director of the CDC, went on Good Morning America to discuss the “Omicron” wave, and ended up pointing out that most “omicron deaths” have multiple co-morbidities.
In another interview, with Fox News, Dr Walenksy said the CDC was going to publish data on how many people had died of Covid, and how many died with it.
This begs a series of important questions.
- Why is the director of the CDC (seemingly) engaging with these Covid skeptic arguments after two years of pretending they don’t exist?
- Why would Sky News air, and then tweet out, the video clip of a doctor challenging the health secretary?
- Why is the Guardian running headlines like “End mass jabs and live with Covid, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce” and quoting medical personnel who say we need to “treat Covid like the flu”?
- Why are new studies being promoted that claim T cells from ordinary colds can “protect you from Covid”?
There’s no denying the messaging, the deceleration of the narrative. There’s a new thread being woven into the story: “living with Covid”.
For over a month that has been a popular buzz phrase all over the Western press.
ACD: COVID messaging has indeed complexified, at a minimum giving HOPIUM to those who complied even while suffering insult and worse, the moronic variant possibly signaling an end to their worst immediate woes. Even so, the so-called “unvaccinated” head to “quarantine camps” in several (now failed) Western states — can’t call them CONcentration camps, now, can we? — while the “vaccinated” head to hospitals or morgues — or simply drop dead on the Playing Field of Life Itself.
Having become a fan of rococco in recent months (thanks to a perspicacious correspondent), I envision a thin, semi-transparent, silky fabric with multiple, colored patterns, in real time folded very slowly back on itself, the light behind projecting Moiré patterns, the eyes both reflecting and refracting, conducting coded illusions to the visual cortex, amusing, perplexing, confusing, a puzzle with an infinite number of pieces or, at least, seven billion or so and counting.
What do I think as a reasonably informed prognostigator|observer|pun-striken raconteur? The useful remnants of the Era of COVID will remain — facial diapers the simplest, most easily recognized — vaccine passports will play out to the Experimenters satisfaction as will “mandatory vaccinations”, all the while concealing moves toward the next major phase of the GREAT RESET, food shortages.
stock here: a substack site posed the question, about 2022 Fringe Predictions
https://quoththeraven.substack.com/
I hope this is a good warning and not a playbook ———————————
2022: They will admit that the Vaccine was a “solution” to almost all of the Earth’s problems. You all should be proud that you made yourself 15% less fertile, as the earth will benefit from less people. We will be rolling out tax breaks to Robotic and AI companies. A Plethora of Robots will allow the remaining people to live at higher quality levels. We will all live at higher quality levels and we can all share in this new found wealth.
The AI will help us individually make better decisions: your purchasing decisions will be monitored and if you go off the prescribed course, an intervention will occur. Property ownership is obviously a racist patriarchal system in which those not privy to the system are continuously suppressed in their ability to ever reach the affluent life. We can all live the affluent life with our Robots servant and producers when we all give up individual property rights.
The vaccines come in many types, and now that you have Antibody Dependent Enhancement ADE meaning an overblown immune response when challenged with a new variant, Pfizer has perfected a system for targeted boosters developed within 45 days. A fringe group a greedy psychopaths who could care less about the rest of society, and sociopathically cannot even empathize that they are putting all of society at risk by not taking the vaccines will be treated. Some may be cured by custom State Provided Injections.
Because we sent each batch of custom vaccine to at least 20 different states, we now know exactly how our initial 4000 various batches affects the populations, in different demographics and States and even temperatures so problem areas of the country can get custom vaccines to push that area to greater prosperity and affluence. Some individuals who still refuse to join the People’s Affluence Movement (PAM), will receive mental health screenings and AI robots will use repetition to get rid of harmful and hateful ways of thinking.
The vaccine is all we need to solve all problem and let everyone live their best life. Follow the science, have faith in the science. The James Webb telescope has now proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no grand creator, no God, and that is why it was launched on Christmas day….your real savior is science formed by our great computers in our hallowed halls. It’s one for all and all for one!
stock here — I call this the first positive effect of the Jabs
Mass Formation: Deployed on You After Over 200 Years of Study
Junior academics cited by “Forbes”, AP, Reuters and “The Independent” have not done their homework
 | Robert W Malone MD, MS Jan 10    |
Today in “factchecking the factcheckers”, junior academics cited by Forbes, Associated Press, Reuters and The Independent have just not done their homework concerning the work of Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet of the University of Ghent in Belgum. All I can say about this is that I hope that their naive, ignorant, grandstanding statements to the press are brought up during their future Academic Tenure and Advancement reviews.
But there has been an amazingly coordinated effort to shoot the messenger and actively character assassinate (or “defenstrate”) me as a surrogate while avoiding any reference to the highly credentialed academic Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet who actually developed the theory and has documented the extensive evidence in an upcoming academic book. So, what can we learn from this in the short term?
Clearly, Google was not the only corporation triggered by Joe Rogan podcast # 1757 which previously reached #1 podcast ranking worldwide, has been referred to as “the most important interview of our time” and has been seen by over 50 million viewers. But what absolutely has been generated by all of the coopted reactionary press and Big Tech titans metaphorically tripping over their shoelaces is a massive trove of real time data validating the brilliant Mass Formation intellectual synthesis developed by Professor Desmet over the last two years.
In this coordinated propaganda and censorship response, we can clearly see the hands of the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative, the Scientific Technological Elite, the transnational investment funds and their World Economic Forum allies which control Pfizer and most of Big Pharma, Legacy Media and Big Tech (and many national governments) acting in real time to suppress a growing awareness by the general public of having been actively manipulated using crowd psychology tools to generate clinically significant fear and anxiety of COVID-19 (otherwise known as “Coronaphobia”) to advance their agendas on a global scale. Multiple governments have now admitted to actively using fear and ‘Mass Formation’-related theories as a tool for totalitarian population control during this outbreak. This is occurring at the same time that Omicron is destroying the legitimacy of government and WHO propaganda concerning the “Safe and Effective” mRNA vaccines and associated mandates.
But what confuses me is why the western press is all following the same narrative as Forbes, which is now owned by a Chinese media holding company. Is this all really just about China wanting to advance a New World Order agenda, and working in a coordinated fashion together with captured western legacy media and their transnational fund overlords?
Break out the popcorn, because we have an “approved narrative” dumpster fire in progress.
“Mass formation has been studied for over 200 years, beginning with such scholars as Gustave Le Bon, Freud, McDougal, Canetti, Hannah Arendt, etc. In the twentieth century, psychologists such as Ash and Sheriff have studied mass formation experimentally.
These scholars did not always call it “mass formation”, but what they studied was basically the same: the way in which individual’s mental states is influenced by their tendency to conform to group thinking. I myself have over 130 publications on Web of Science, a large part of them focusing on how individuals’ personality structures is influenced by their relationships with other people.
In my upcoming book: The psychology of totalitarianism, I analyze and describe the way in which the psychological process of mass formation got stronger and stronger throughout the last two centuries.”
Mattias Desmet, Professor of Clinical Psychology at Ghent University in Belgium
Please follow this link for Professor Dr. Desmet’s Prior Academic Works
Abridged from M. Desmet: “The Psychology of Totalitarianism”
Mass Formation – brief summary
• Totalitarianism requires the total obedience of the mass
• This obedience is been created via mass formation process inside the population
• Four conditions are needed:
- The masses must feel alone and isolated.
- Their lives must feel pointless and meaningless.
- The masses then must experience constant free floating anxiety, and
- They must experience free-floating frustration and aggression.
With these conditions met, people are now ripe for hypnosis.
•No matter how stupid, senseless or even harmful the “solution”, people are made to feel solidarity, which validates the whole thing for them
• They are now changed, no longer rational. This automatically excludes analyses based on mathematical approaches like Nash’s game theory, where all agents are assumed to act completely rationally.
• People who are consumed by the mass formation process become intolerant and cruel.
Development of mathematical models to describe this process are currently in progress in a collaboration between Professor Desmet and Dr. rer. nat. habil. Norbert Schwarzer. This work is building upon prior academic modeling work including the following volumes:
Earlier seminal academic works regarding mass formation upon which Professor Desmet has based his theory include the following
- Gustave Le Bon (1841-1931)
- The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, 1895
PDF (pp. 157), HTML, Public Domain complete audiobook, Worldcat - Overview of The Crowd
- William McDougall (1871-1938)
- The Group Mind; A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology, with Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character, 1920
First Edition 1920 (pp. 419), HTML/ebook format; Second Edition 1927 (pp. 304), Worldcat
Elias Canetti (1905-1994) Crowds and Power, 1960
PDF (pp. 495), WorldcatOverview of Crowds and Power
- Classification and Symbols of Masses in the Conception of Elias Canetti (2019)
- John Ioannidis (1965-)
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, 2005
- Hannah Arendt (1906-1975)
- Eichmann in Jerusalem, A Report on the Banality of Evil, 1963
PDF (pp. 401), Worldcat - The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
HTML, Second Edition 1958 (pp. 521), Worldcat - Solomon Asch (1907-1996)
- Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments, 1951
- Opinions and Social Pressure, 1955
PDF - Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority, 1956
Use of fear to control behavior in Covid crisis was ‘totalitarian’, admit scientists
Members of Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour express regret about ‘unethical’ methods.
The Telegraph. By Gordon Rayner, 14 May 2021
A State of Fear by Laura Dodsworth
A State of Fear: how the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic
This is a book about fear. Fear of a virus. Fear of death. Fear of losing our jobs, our democracy, our human connections, our health and our minds. It’s also about how the government weaponised our fear against us – supposedly in our best interests – until we were the most frightened country in Europe.
Fear is the most powerful emotion. Hardwired into humans, fear is part of our evolutionary success. But that also makes it one of the most powerful tools in the behavioural psychology toolbox and it has been used to manipulate and control people during the pandemic.
In one of the most extraordinary documents ever revealed to the British public, the behavioural scientists advising the government said that a substantial number of people did not feel threatened enough by Covid-19 to follow the rules. They advised the government to increase our sense of ‘personal threat’, to scare us into submission.
But why did the government deliberately frighten us, and how has this affected us as individuals and as a country? Who is involved in the decision-making that affects our lives? How are behavioural science and nudge theory being used to subliminally manipulate us? How does the media leverage fear? What are the real risks to our wellbeing?
Ahead of any official inquiry into the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, Laura Dodsworth explores all these questions and more, in a nuanced and thought-provoking discussion of an extraordinary year in British life and politics. With stories from members of the general public who were impacted by fear, anxiety and isolation, and revealing interviews with psychologists, politicians, scientists, lawyers, Whitehall advisers and journalists, A State of Fear calls for a more hopeful, transparent and effective democracy.
stock here. There were 5 teenage girls in Wisconsin, clearly killed by the Vax. Bad enough, so I decided to review all adverse events in Wisconsin. A swing state, and they are receiving “special batches” as you will see, even on this small sample size, the killer batches can be quickly spotted. You can download the whole spreadsheet at Box, link below the table…..its for all the VAERS data under 18 YO
stock here: It seems clearcut their intentions….to create a scary caseademic, by taking COVID afflicted people out of quarantine just 5 days after start of symptoms, many people take a full week to recover.
Around the country, schools and health organizations scrambled to interpret the news release and adjust their policies — only to change course again when the CDC filled out details and its rationale in full guidance published about a week later.
“That gap left us guessing what we should actually do,” Kilkenny said. “That’s not good management and good communication. It leads to misunderstanding. It leads to distrust.”
stock here: If you just looked at the First Chart, you would think that the Influenza vax had a high percentage of death. But the reality is that the Flu Vax is quite safe at least in relation to death, and there have been way more Flu Vax than any other, over 30 years of VAERS data.
stock here: calling out the balderdash of the liars that be. Immunity can last a long time.
Here we show that of the 32 individuals tested that were born in or before 1915, each showed seroreactivity with the 1918 virus, nearly 90 years after the pandemic. Seven of the eight donor samples tested had circulating B cells that secreted antibodies that bound the 1918 HA. We isolated B cells from subjects and generated five monoclonal antibodies that showed potent neutralizing activity against 1918 virus from three separate donors.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18716625/
I can’t believe this was allowed to be published in a Chicago paper….natural immunity is broader than vaccine induced immunity.
—————————
CHICAGO (Reuters) – A critical component of the immune system known as T cells that respond to fight infection from the original version of the novel coronavirus appear to also protect against three of the most concerning new virus variants, according to a U.S. laboratory study released on Tuesday.
Several recent studies have shown that certain variants of the novel coronavirus can undermine immune protection from antibodies and vaccines.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-variants-idUSKBN2BM3BZ
https://www.brighteon.com/2b36ce94-a9bc-41a1-9261-4d49a4cb23bc
stock here: I went through my archive, prior to the massive Google ban and Blogger Shut Down in August. It can be found in the link below.
https://deeperdivedata.blogspot.com/2021/07/pfizer-has-over-5000-batches-of-vxx.html
I found on July 31st
“Pfizer Has Over 5000 Batches Of VXX Responsible for At Least 1 Reported Death, Some Batches Are The Devils Work“
Also 2 spreadsheets and charts, although the charts don’t show up. I may be able to access the original images via logging in as Admin to the old blogger. I imagine they will take that down too at some point, haven’t been in there in weeks or months.
Above is html, lets see if that works.
The ground elevation there is 1474 Meters
It was a 2.7
Disney+ actress Kim Mi-soo dead at 29
Mi-soo recently appeared in the series ‘Snowdrop’ in a supporting role
“Kim suddenly left us on Jan. 5,” her agency Landscape said in a statement on Wednesday, according to Variety. “The bereaved are deep in their sorrow at the sudden sadness. Please refrain from reporting false rumors or speculation so that the family can mourn in peace.”
Please refrain from pointing out the she killed herself…..
Disclaimer:
https://datachinchilla.substack.com/p/analysis-of-football-soccer-injury?showWelcome=true
This article is not intended to prove or confirm in any way that any heart related issues are caused by covid-19 vaccines. This article only exists to analyse the data and see if there is a correlation and if there’s a correlation what might be the frequency if correlation was caused by covid-19 vaccines.
There have been many headlines about athletes collapsing, dying and there are claims out there that it’s a lot more frequent during this year than you would normally expect.
Many lists have been compiled for this year with list of news articles of such cases happening.
Claims have been made that these injuries could be covid-19 vaccine related as for example myocarditis is linked to mRNA vaccines such as Pfizer and Moderna.
There’s also an abstract in American Heart Association publication by Steven Gundry with a claim that certain inflammatory markers change after taking the vaccine increasing heart disease risk over 2 times.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
I haven’t noticed a good comparison being made with previous years so far. How can we tell whether there’s truly more heart related issues happening than previously?
I decided to go over data from https://www.transfermarkt.com
They keep track of injuries for players and they have a list of over 900,000 player profiles. Not every player has up to date profiles, but if we are lucky we can still compile something statistically significant from there. This will allow us to compare heart related injury rates compared to previous years.
I wrote a script to go over all injury pages, for all players. It took a while to crawl over 900,000 pages, but here I present the findings.
Example of a page highlighting those injuries:
Findings
The first and most obvious thing I could think of was to just compare absolute numbers. How many cases of “Heart Condition” has there been for each year?
Following that I figured I compile a list of injuries that stand out for year 2021. I will compare each injury that occurs with at least 1 out of 1,500 frequency.
I’m starting from year 2015, there were injury reports before that, but before this year count of injuries was fewer compared to latest years indicating that injuries weren’t as well tracked then.
For 2020 and 2021 there were also very many “Corona virus” and “Quarantine” listed out as injuries. For now I have filtered those to have better comparisons with previous years.
Injuries listed by year
This data does indicate that heart related injuries have been much more frequent this year than any previous years. For other years besides 2021, there were 89217 total injuries counted, with 100 heart conditions. (0.11%) on average. And for 2021 there were 19912 injuries, with 44 heart conditions. This gives us p-value of 0.0012. It seems clear that there is statistical significance for this number. The question is just – what has caused it? Is it coronavirus, vaccines or something else entirely?
There’s more than 99% chance that these heart conditions are not a statistical fluke.
Blue = All other years, Red = 2021
Injuries more frequent for 2021 than expected average
Injuries that have happened more frequently than 1 out of 2000 times, ordered by how much more frequently they appeared compared to average rate from all injuries. This average considers also total average per injuries counted to treat fairly years were there were fewer injuries happening. So you can see for example “Contracture” having different “Other years average” for 2021 and 2020, since 2021 simply had more injuries, and therefore would have more higher expected average.
So here, heart condition also stands out for current year. Another injury that stands out is contracture, however it is unclear to me what is specifically meant by that. Contracture also stood out for 2020, but not for other years. Heart condition seems to have happened 2 times the average of other years.
Injuries more frequent for 2020 than expected average
So contracture also stands out here, but just in case let’s also review 2019 as a comparison. It also seems that some corona virus cases, even though I removed those injuries from the list may have been classified as “Virus Infection”.
Injuries more frequent for 2019 than expected average
Heart condition injuries count by quarter of the year ordered
So far it’s clear that 2021 is the most popular year for heart conditions. It would also be interesting to know how they generally divide amongst the year and how they compare to other quarters. This would allow us to compare whether most heart related issues happened during high vaccination times or not. Average heart condition injuries per quarter is 5.14.
Let’s now order all the quarters since 2015. Here’s top 20 quarters laid out
So quarter 3 does seem quite a bit above other quarters, with 2nd, 4th for 2021 following.
Overall this does give an impression that doesn’t rule out these heart conditions being caused by the vaccine, since Q2, Q3 and Q4 were when bulk of the vaccinations were done for athletes.
Frequency Conjecture
The following is a complete conjecture and guesswork. Since there does seem to be at least a correlation, then how frequent those incidents are? In the database I crawled over 900,000 profiles, but not all of them are active players and injuries are not tracked in great detail for lower profile players. Most players whom injuries are tracked for should have at least one injury per 2-3 seasons. I picked some news articles from lists with heart issues happening for football players in 2021, and many of them didn’t seem to have “heart condition” listed in Transfermarkt, so it seems safe to say that not all and especially lower profile player injuries are not well tracked.
I counted all players who have had any injury recorded in 19/20 or 20/21. The number is 19913. In 2021 there was 44 heart conditions which means the frequency would yield to around 1 out of 450. Excess heart conditions is 22 and if for instance we expect 70% of players to have received vaccinations, this would mean 30 heart conditions per 13939 vaccinated players. Around 1 out of 600.
Conclusion
There are more heart related issues this year for athletes than in years before according to the data recorded by Transfermarkt. If we were to assume that all excess is caused by vaccinations, it would yield to around 1 out of 600 risk of getting a heart condition from vaccination for athletes.
Limitations
- There’s lots of injuries written as “Unknown”.
- Many injuries may have not been included.
Notes of interest, questions and further research ideas
- What’s the significance of “Contracture” being more frequently reported in both 2020 and 2021? Was it just something that was a newly added classifier? Is this related to Coronavirus in any way?
- There’s many other larger injury groups that seem to happen at twice the rate. Are they simply newer classifications and are reported more for these reasons?
- Go over the injuries found case by case.
Other links of interest
- List of association footballers who died while playing
- 5 fold increase in sudden cardiac deaths of FIFA players in 2021
- Abstract 10712: Observational Findings of PULS Cardiac Test Findings for Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving mRNA Vaccines
- List of athlete collapses/deaths in 2021
Edits
- Fixed inflated multiplier values for injuries outstanding for each of the years.
In response to some criticisms (at far bottom) about the Subject Abstract, I offered the following.
The Abstract Published in the American Heart Association
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
I agree with some of what you say, I tried to search for the whole article and couldn’t even find that. What is really a shame is that someone else with hundreds of millions to study COVID couldn’t pony up for a similar study with a much higher population and a control group. Its disappointing, and frankly, suspicious. As even this preliminary result is alerting if not alarming. Don’t miss my nifty charts at the bottom.
Discussion
- There is a control group, the patient himself
- 566 patients is a pretty good size number, I have seen many medical studies with less than 100, this and the 8 years of prior tracking at every 3 to 6 months, Dr john Campbell call this a good baseline
- Agreed that these people already had cardiac problems as their biomarkers were already above the norm, but that does nothing towards throwing out the data. It may be true that someone with existing cardiac problems would be greatly affected, and completely healthy people may be able to take the inflammatory assault pretty much in stride.
- Indeed this study looks at Markers. And it needs to because we can’t just watch for 5 years to count the heart attacks and deaths, we need to be more proactive. These markers are good markers, and Doctor John Campbell explains why, he accepts all of them as good and logical. Dr Campbell has 2M followers, he does a great presentation using drawings and props. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEBGl8MVE-c
- I did a simple statistical analysis, and it is obvious from the whisker plots that there are wide difference in individual reaction, but clearly an elevation in these injurious markers.
- The above also serve as a debunk to this Medscape attempt at a Debunk (heads up….Medscape is almost as horrible as JAMA in terms of being so politically slanted)
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/964358?src=
This is the company that created the PULS test. It looks pretty good!
https://www.pulstest.com/physicians
https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5593036214001#sp=show-clips
————————————————————————-
First in!
Misleading title. It does not report an increase in heart damage. It reports an increase in markers that may lead to heart damage.
These patients all had risk factors to start with, else why were they going to a cardiologist every 6 months? It was a private clinic, not part of an academic study.
The data has not been processed for statistical validity. However, the averages and ranges are strongly suggestive of an impact, and the N is not small.
We know of at least one person who had a cardiac/metobolic reaction to the vaccine, but significant risk factors were present beforehand. A tiny fraction of patients react to this or that vaccine – this doesn’t invalidate the effectiveness of vaccines.