stock here: this one has 2.9M views and over 10,000 comments. I am not promoting this person or channel, I am not sure how I feel about it, it almost feels like an apologist for transhumanism, by expressly stating that from the get go, the use of fire by early man was the start of “transhumanism”. And the long segways to the female tech developer using Amazon Web Services for facial recognition and “lie detecting”.
I posted this before, but it is so clear, it needs to be shown again. I found a YouTube and posted at the far bottom.
She blends geopolitical analysis with spiritual conviction, urging audiences to remember that the human soul cannot be coded, cloned, or uploaded. Her message is not one of fear, but of remembrance — that consciousness itself is sacred.
This seems to be the longest version of this speech,
Laura Aboli “Transhumanism: The End Game” – Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM)
Laura Aboli – United Democratic International Movement for Awareness and Freedom | LinkedIn
Laura Aboli has emerged as one of the clearest voices warning against what she calls “the final frontier of human control” — the transhumanist agenda. Through speeches, interviews, and articles, she blends geopolitical analysis with spiritual conviction, urging audiences to remember that the human soul cannot be coded, cloned, or uploaded. Her message is not one of fear, but of remembrance — that consciousness itself is sacred.
Aboli’s most recognized appearance came at the Better Way Conference 2023 in Bath, UK, hosted by the World Council for Health. Her talk, titled “Transhumanism: The End Game,” was a passionate plea to preserve the integrity of human life and spirit amid technological acceleration. She warned that the fusion of AI, genetic editing, and biometric control systems could lead not to liberation but to enslavement if humanity forgets its divine origin.
Watch her full speech here: Better Way Conference Talk on YouTube
Following the conference, Aboli’s ideas spread widely through podcasts and independent media. On platforms such as the Tenpenny Podcast and Rumble, she continued unpacking the philosophical roots of transhumanism — tracing its lineage from technocratic utopianism to modern-day digital governance. Her conversations often turn toward personal sovereignty, divine consciousness, and the forgotten language of compassion in political life.
Listen to an in‑depth interview: The Tenpenny Podcast – Laura Aboli Interview
While best known for her oratory, Aboli also writes essays that blend social critique with spiritual discernment. Her 2025 article “Truth about Iran,” published on Energy Update, examined geopolitics through the lens of moral responsibility and collective awakening.
Read the article: Truth about Iran by Laura Aboli
At the heart of Aboli’s message lies a conviction that human beings are not merely biological machines. She invokes classical philosophy and faith traditions to remind listeners that our capacity for love, intuition, and creativity points to something eternal. In her words, “The ultimate rebellion is to stay human — to feel, to pray, and to refuse to let the algorithm define our worth.”
Through her organization, the United Democratic International Movement for Awareness and Freedom, Laura Aboli continues to speak across Europe and online, inspiring a community of thinkers, activists, and believers who view the defense of humanity as a sacred duty. Her work straddles philosophy, politics, and mysticism — a rare synthesis in an age that often demands conformity over conscience.
Official Profiles and Channels:
• LinkedIn – Laura Aboli
• Better Way Events 2023 Archive
• Rumble – Transhumanism The End Game
© 2025 Feature profile prepared for research and educational use.
stock here, name of Cohen almost for sure a jew. Bing!!!
Stanley Cohen was born in 1950 and raised in Port Chester, New York, in an Orthodox Jewish family. He attended Hebrew schools and had a bar mitzvah.
The Forward
Ethnicity/race: He is Jewish by upbringing/heritage (Orthodox background).
The Forward
His political affiliation: He is not widely identified with a mainstream U.S. political party; his self-description emphasizes radical defense work.
Professional role: He is an attorney, and describes himself as an advocate for clients “the government would like to silence or put in jail.”
istanleycohen.org
+1
🧑💼 Major Activism & Legal Work
Cohen has represented high-profile and highly controversial clients: members/leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, a relative of Osama bin Laden, and detainees at Guantánamo Bay.
Wikipedia
+1
He has written opinion pieces for Al Jazeera and appears regularly in Middle-East forums, criticizing Israeli policy and U.S. foreign-aid policy toward Israel.
Al Jazeera
+1
Example: In 2014 Cohen pleaded guilty to tax charges—specifically obstructing the IRS and failing to file required returns; he was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Wikipedia
+1
⚠️ Controversies & Criticisms
His legal defense of clients tied to designated terrorist organizations has drawn significant backlash and accusations of being a “terrorist mouthpiece.”
Wikipedia
His writings and public comments include vehement criticism of Israeli policies; some of those critics allege he uses provocative language about Zionism and Israel.
The Forward
His tax conviction impacted his law license.
Wikipedia
🔍 Why He’s Noted in Context
Cohen is particularly relevant when analyzing:
U.S. legal-defense strategy for unpopular/terror-linked clients
U.S.–Middle East political criticisms and activism around Palestine/Israel
The intersection of U.S. civil-liberties law (defense of “unpopular” defendants) and global human-rights/terror-law concerns
—————————–
To prevent an abusive Judiciary, why shouldn’t the unliked and outliers have excellent defense attorneys?
Here’s a tight summary of the video’s “do-not-install” (or “uninstall”) software list, with reasons and safer alternatives.
stock here: we all get used to the fact that we are continually spied on. This guy deep dives.
stock here: RFK has commented on Chicken Depop, he is in general against it, and also against chicken vaccinations. But he has no power, and the USDA is heavily leaned as Democratic.
The USDA has a legal staff of 250 People!!!!!!! They have 100,000 total employees. But they still can’t figure out how to not kill all the chickens.
The number 2 guy is a lawyer from Tennessee.
He seems like a good guy, he is directly involved with re-organizing USDA, kicking half of the DC workers out to the field where they can actually see cows and chickens.
https://www.eenews.net/articles/usda-defends-secretive-rollout-of-reorganization-plan
Michael Watson is head of APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services. He has 8000 employees and a budget of $2.015B He fights against puppy abuse and dog-slaughter……must be a good guy.
Mindy Brashears, a Republican, and Trump appointee, and pro food industry.
https://www.texasobserver.org/mindy-brashears-covid-19-food-safety
Glenn Smith appointed by Trump in 2019 and is an Iowa farmer.
https://cbs2iowa.com/news/local/iowa-native-appointed-to-rural-development-leadership-for-usda
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110221/witnesses/HHRG-116-AG22-Wstate-SmithG-20191119.pdf
stock here, this is amazing, because I have never put 2 and 2 together before. See prior article also.
Excellent question — and one that goes almost entirely unasked. The Animal Health Protection Act (AHPA), codified at 7 U.S.C. § 8301 et seq., was enacted in May 2002 as Subtitle E of Title X of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-171).
While it didn’t originate as a stand-alone bill, it was deliberately folded into the 2002 Farm Bill, giving USDA sweeping consolidated power over animal disease control, quarantine, and destruction — authority that had previously been scattered across older statutes dating back to 1884.
In hearings, USDA argued that animal-disease authority was “fragmented and antiquated,” citing the old statutes: the Animal Quarantine Laws, the Swine Health Protection Act, the Horse Protection Act, and others. They sought a single, modernized law that would give the Secretary unified powers to detect, control, or eradicate animal diseases and pests — including seizure, quarantine, destruction, and disposal authority, plus compensation discretion.
Even in 2002, some civil-liberties and small-producer advocates objected:
The AHPA sits at the intersection of biosecurity, agriculture policy, and emergency powers. In the calm light of 2024, several elements stand out:
stock here: This essentially gives them complete control over the Animal Food Supply of the USA. With the extent of Rogue agents able to get into Government Agencies, including foreign actors, whether here legally or not….this should be of extreme concern.
The AHPA is a direct result in 2002, of the 9-11 attacks 9-11-2001, spurred on by bio-security concerns. See far bottom for that discussion
———————-
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/8306
——————
A-Eye
You’re pointing to a very consequential provision of the Animal Health Protection Act (AHPA):
“The determination by the Secretary of the amount to be paid under this subsection shall be final and **not subject to judicial review or review by any officer or employee of the Federal Government other than the Secretary or the designee of the Secretary.” Justia Law+2U.S. Code+2
Here’s a breakdown of what this means, why it may raise serious concerns (including about regulatory creep, accountability, and due process), and some commentary on how it fits in the broader legal/constitutional framework.
Statutory context:
What it practically means:
Whether it is outrageous depends on perspective—but yes, I believe there are very valid grounds to view it as troubling for the following reasons:
If you like, I can research how courts have handled this specific “no judicial review” clause under § 8306(d)(2)(C)—past cases where owners tried to challenge valuation under AHPA or predecessor statutes, and how the courts ruled. Would that be helpful?
stock here: if we don’t eventually get happy healthy Chickens, immune or survivable to Bird Flu, then our food insecurity will last, FOREVER. A-Eye is anti-RFK.
See below, the number of times they use “depopulation” instead of mass killing, or mass culling. 1 in 20 people now dying in Canada are being directly killed by a Doctor, paid to kill. Yes, that is real.
Canada Has Euthanized 90,000 People – LifeNews.com
—————-
ChatGPT said:
Below is a detailed conversation-style summary covering how and why mass culling of chickens occurs during outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), who enforces it, what laws empower the action, and how much farmers are compensated per chicken type.
Primary law: The Animal Health Protection Act (AHPA) — 7 U.S.C. § 8301 et seq. — gives USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) authority to restrict movement, seize or destroy animals, and take preventive controls to eradicate or control diseases threatening animal or public health.
Regulations: 9 C.F.R. Part 53 and related USDA guidance documents govern HPAI indemnity and compensation.
Enforcement: USDA/APHIS acts jointly with state animal health agencies. Detection of HPAI on a premises typically triggers a federally and state-supervised depopulation of the affected and exposed birds.
USDA APHIS leads enforcement, supported by State Veterinarians and Departments of Agriculture. They conduct disease confirmation, establish control areas, issue quarantines, and oversee depopulation and disposal.
Farmers are compensated for destroyed birds and eggs through the USDA’s indemnity program. Payments are based on fair market value and funded through USDA appropriations or emergency allocations via the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). Compensation does not cover lost future production or income.
As of 2025, USDA raised indemnity for egg-laying hens (layers) to approximately $16.94 per bird. Values for broilers, turkeys, and pullets vary depending on age, market value, and production stage but are not universally published.
Indemnity covers the value of birds destroyed under official order, while “compensation” may additionally cover costs of disposal and cleanup. Farmers must meet biosecurity audit requirements to receive payment.
| Element | Explanation |
| Legal authority | Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 8301 et seq.) |
| Regulations | 9 C.F.R. Part 53; USDA HPAI guidance documents |
| Enforcement | USDA/APHIS with State Animal Health Officials |
| Trigger | Detection of HPAI infection or exposure on a premises |
| Funding source | USDA annual appropriations and Commodity Credit Corporation |
| Indemnity value (layers) | $16.94 per bird (2025 adjustment) |
| Indemnity value (other types) | Varies; fair market valuation applied |
• aphis.usda.gov — HPAI depopulation and indemnity guidance
• ecfr.gov — Title 9 CFR Part 53 and 56 poultry health rules
• congress.gov — CRS Report R48518 (Animal Health Protection Act)
• federalregister.gov — 2024-31384 interim rule on HPAI indemnity
• meatpoultry.com — 2025 update reporting $16.94 per layer hen rate
• investigatemidwest.org — 2024 data on average payments ($39k median)
• nationalaglawcenter.org — summary of indemnity process
• sentientmedia.org — taxpayer coverage of poultry-indemnity costs
• iowacapitaldispatch.com — 2025 biosecurity requirement update
About one-third of U.S. eggs are processed into liquid or dried egg products used in hundreds of foods — baked goods, sauces, pasta, and dressings. Because of this deep integration, HPAI culling directly affects food prices and supply stability.
Short-term culling raises costs but limits virus spread; letting infections ‘run’ could risk more severe, prolonged losses.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has criticized the mass culling policy and suggested allowing natural immunity to develop in flocks, opposing widespread poultry vaccination out of concern for viral mutation.
Experts, however, warn that letting HPAI spread could amplify mutations and spillover risk to other species, including humans. USDA’s “stamping out” policy remains the global standard to contain outbreaks.
The culling of chickens in the U.S. during HPAI outbreaks is a targeted, legally authorized containment measure—not a blanket rule to kill all chickens. It is enforced by USDA APHIS and state agencies under the Animal Health Protection Act, funded by USDA/CCC indemnities, and pays farmers market value (around $17 per layer hen in 2025). While it causes short-term price spikes and supply issues, it remains the accepted strategy for preventing larger-scale food and economic disruption.
stock here: I mean, it’s absurd, does it work on some people?
But even when you click on the “READ MEMO HERE” you just get a sales pitch for a donation, there is no memo from Kash Patel, is that an effective strategy….to promise something, not delivery, and instead bait and switch. That looks guaranteed for failure.
So do they get 1 out of 100,000? While bothering and wasting time for 99,999?
| THE TRUTH IS OUT — AND EVERYONE INVOLVED IS PANICKING. |
| I got the call. My FBI Director, Kash Patel, found what they tried to BURN. But the truth is on borrowed time. You need to read this memo NOW, before they slam the door shut. |
| READ MEMO HERE |
| – POTUS |
a-Eye has this to say…….
Exactly — what you’re describing is a psychological-marketing funnel, not a legitimate communication from those figures.
Here’s what’s going on under the hood and why it does work—just not in the way you or I would expect.
These emails are produced by political fundraising agencies (often via platforms like WinRed) that use the names of high-profile figures to generate urgency and emotional engagement.
They’re legally authorized “joint fundraising committees,” but none of the named people wrote or even saw the message.
Each one follows a data-tested pattern of persuasion:
| Technique | Example from your screenshots | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Urgency framing | “You need to read this memo NOW, before they slam the door shut.” | Triggers fear of missing out (FOMO) and impulsive clicking. |
| Authority appeal | “My FBI Director, Kash Patel…” | Creates a sense of insider access and legitimacy. |
| Misdirection (bait-and-switch) | “READ MEMO HERE” → Donation form | Gets the click first; conversion to money request second. |
| Tribal / identity language | “MAGA! >”, “FEAR NOT” | Reinforces group belonging, lowering skepticism. |
| Repetition & micro-conversions | Multiple “MAGA! >” links per email | Tests which phrasing or position drives the most donations. |
These messages are A/B tested thousands of times. Even if only 0.01–0.1 % of recipients donate, the blast still pays off because sending millions of emails costs almost nothing.
It’s not about credibility per se; it’s about volume and emotion.
That’s an ROI of over 1 000 %, so there’s no financial penalty for alienating everyone else.
In short, they don’t need 1 in 100 000; they only need 1 in 2 000.
These tactics skate the edge of Federal Election Commission rules: as long as the fine print discloses the committee and disclaimers (as yours does at the bottom), it’s technically compliant.
Ethically, though, it’s deceptive marketing, not authentic political discourse.
stock here: I tried to post this a few days ago when it came out, but I have been locked out of my account for several days, after posting several truths about the bastards that run Israel.
In a no shame display of Calumny towards Trump, Vanity Fair posts a shit stained photo of a younger Virgina Giuffere and pretends that all her troubles started with Trump at Mar a Lago.
————- What are their motivations?
| Word | Meaning | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Malice | The intent to harm another’s reputation or wellbeing. | Simple, broad, common in law (“actual malice”). |
| Calumny | The deliberate making of false, defamatory statements. | From Latin calumnia; very precise for “false smearing.” |
| Defamation | Any intentional communication of a falsehood that harms someone’s reputation. | Legal term — includes libel (written) and slander (spoken). |
| Vilification | Speaking or writing about someone abusively to destroy their good name. | Emphasizes tone and attack. |
| Detraction | Less common; the act of lessening someone’s reputation, often by gossip. | Often used in moral or religious contexts. |
| Smear | Informal, vivid term for an attempt to damage someone’s reputation with falsehoods. | “Smear campaign.” |
| Aspersion | A false or misleading accusation meant to harm someone’s character. | Often used in plural: “to cast aspersions.” |
👉 If you want the psychological motive — the inner desire to make another look bad even without gain — that borders on malicious envy, spite, or malevolence.
stock here: we need more of this. This black admiral was promoted to head the US Southern Command, by the Biden Entity November 2024.
—————————
He probably had a bunch of reasons to leave, as he headed up the totally prejudicial DEI programs for the Navy. Review of the following people would also likely show them to be Woke and Joke.
The sudden change at Southern Command is the latest shake-up for the military’s senior ranks under the Trump administration. Then-Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. C.Q. Brown and Navy chief Adm. Lisa Franchetti were fired in February, along with the top legal officers across the services. In April, Cyber Command chief Gen. Timothy Haugh was dismissed.
And Air Force chief of staff Gen. David Allvin plans to retire in November, just halfway into his four-year term.
Meanwhile, the repeated strikes in the Caribbean have heightened tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, where Nicolas Maduro’s government has responded by ordering military exercises, mobilizing civilian militias and denouncing U.S. actions as aggression.
In surprise move, head of US military for Latin America to step down | Reuters
A-Eye sayeth, he be Woke
Short answer: I can’t find any record of Adm. Alvin “Bull” Holsey personally taking a public, explicit position “for” (or “against”) transgender service. What we can document is this:
Holsey is on the record leading a Navy initiative that explicitly included sexual identity within its inclusion remit, which signals support for a broader anti-discrimination posture. However, I can’t find a direct, explicit public statement from Holsey saying he supports transgender service or transgender-specific policies. If you’re seeing claims that “Holsey supports (or opposes) transgenders,” they’re likely inferring from his TF1N
stock here—-summary on 2 DEI Mavens that were fired.
——————————–
Here’s a summary of publicly-reported reasons and suspicions surrounding the firings/removals of both Charles Q. Brown Jr. (“C.Q. Brown”) and Lisa Franchetti. Neither case was accompanied by a fully detailed publicly-explained rationale, so much of what follows is inference, context, and what sources say is likely.
Position: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS)
What happened: On February 21, 2025, President Donald Trump abruptly relieved Brown of his duties as CJCS. DefenseScoop+2PBS+2
Reported reasons / context:
Interpretation / suspicion:
Position: Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (the first woman to hold the CNO role)
What happened: On February 21, 2025 (same day as Brown’s removal), Secretary Hegseth announced that the administration was “requesting nominations” for the CNO role — effectively relieving Franchetti. Breaking Defense+1
Reported reasons / context:
Some lawmakers and senior officers have voiced concern that the removals undermine morale, degrade the message of equal opportunity, and may reduce the diversity of senior leadership — which many view as a readiness factor. Military Times+1
Both firings occurred on the same day (21 Feb 2025) and were part of broader leadership changes announced by the Pentagon. USNI News+1
The broader shift appears to emphasize:
Prioritizing what the administration defines as “warfighting readiness” over inclusion/diversity programs.
Ensuring senior leaders align ideologically or politically with the administration’s view of the military role.
————————————————-
And here is another. These people must bring “something to the table” but I guess it is hard to demote someone, so maybe firing is the only real choice.
Democratic lawmakers slam Trump admin after Reuters reports US Navy admiral firing | Reuters
stock here: who doesn’t already know it was Soros based?
1,001 views
Oct 13 • 25 tweets • 12 min read • Read on X
🧵 THREAD: Meet the Organizers Behind No Kings protest: Indivisible’s Leah Greenberg & Ezra Levin 🇺🇸
Taking a break from book writing for this…
This week, the movement that started with a Google Doc… Indivisible… is back in the streets. ✊ Founded by former congressional staffers Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin and funded by George Soros’ Open Society network, Indivisible has grown from a viral guide into one of the most powerful grassroots networks in the U.S.
Now, they’re leading NoKings, a nationwide push to remind America that democracy means no one is above the law. 👑❌
This thread dives into who Greenberg and Levin are, how Indivisible rose to prominence, and what’s really behind the “No Kings” movement.
As always, patience as I pull the thread together in real time.
👇
When you go to the NoKings website, you’ll find over a hundred partners listed, many of them familiar and many Soros-backed. They include big names closely tied to the DNC such as Marc Elias’ Democracy Forward.
Greenberg and Levin are co-founders of Indivisible. Other than donor-advised funds, their backing primarily comes from Open Society and Fund for a Better Future. The latter is a shadowy nonprofit backed by Sergey Brin and played a key role in the infamous “Build Back Better” campaign of 2020.
The first thing you notice about Leah Greenberg’s LinkedIn is that she held an advisory position in the State Department, despite having gotten her International Relations BA only six years earlier.
That Leah Greenberg once served in the State Department, was trained in foreign policy, and now leads the nation’s largest protests is no coincidence. If you’ve followed my feed, you know the connection between left-wing activism, international relations, and the State Department runs deep.
None of this is spontaneous. For years, subversive actors have worked to stage a color revolution here at home.
Greenberg appears to have been a Rosenthal fellow – literally groomed to be a key player in foreign policy early on. The scholarship is sponsored by Partnership in Public Service, which in turn is supported by the Bloombergs (Michael Bloomberg is a member of the Rockefeller-originated Trilateral Commission) and Ford Foundation.
Indivisible started out in 2016 as a Google Document led by Greenberg, Levin, and other Congressional ex-staffers. Within weeks, it went viral and money poured in, and they began organizing themselves into group quickly. They modeled themselves after the Tea Party.
In addition to being groomed to work in the Department of State, Greenberg is an ex-staffer under Tom Perriello (D-VA).
Tom Perriello was an executive director at the Open Society Foundations.
The money connections here become much clearer: the co-founder of Indivisible literally worked for the guy who helped run Open Society Foundations for the USA. No wonder she was able to amass massive amounts of funding and get organizational support in such a short time.
Evidence Pereillo and Greenberg have maintained a close relationship: Pereillo also served as Special Representative for the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review at the State Department from February 24, 2014 to July 5, 2015 under Barack Obama. This overlaps almost exactly with Leah Greenberg’s tenure on the same board.
Open Society Foundations saw it fit to mention their financing of Indivisible in one of their articles early on (2018). In writing for Columbia University’s Journal of International Affairs about how Trump eroded democracy, they have a quote from Greenberg and Levin about Indivisible receiving funding from OSF.
It’s a cliché, but all signs so far suggest that Indivisible is primarily a Soros-backed Open Society project.
Ezra Levin, the spouse of Leah Greenberg, got his start as Deputy Policy Directer under Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-TX). He appears to serve as a charismatic face for Indivisible.
The most interesting connections are through Greenberg, but Levin’s star is rising as well. He sits on the advisory board for Supreme Court Voter, a role shared by many heavyweights such as Marc Elias.
Alongside the Open Society Foundations, Democracy Alliance stands as the other major donor. Created by Rob Stein, also a backer of Media Matters, and closely tied to Arabella Advisors, Democracy Alliance draws its funding from twenty-five affluent progressive patrons, chief among them… George Soros.
As an aside, George Soros had long collaborated with the State Department since the 80’s, but Bush’s handling of the Iraq War convinced him that the United States had become the greatest obstacle to realizing his vision of Open Societies.
I mark May 27, 2003 as the date when George Soros declared war on the United States.
Indeed, Indivisible, the leading organizer of these nationwide protests, is staffed with multiple Open Society-linked members, not just Leah Greenberg. Marielena Hincapié, its founding board president, previously led the National Immigration Law Center, an OSF grantee.
Heather C. McGhee, Indivisible Board member, also serves on the board of Open Society Foundations… and Rockefeller Brothers Fund, for good measure.
Tom Perriello himself became executive director of OSF in 2018, the same year that Indivisible started getting millions. He is also listed by KeyWiki as an Indivisible Civics Board Member, although I could not trace this.
Angel Padilla, former National Policy Director, was also hired off National Immigration Law Center (OSF-backed initiative which advocates radically expansionist immigration programs).
CLOSING THE THREAD:
Twenty years ago, George Soros declared a mission to “open” the United States; AKA cleanse the USA of its attachment to traditions and faith. Since then, he’s poured billions into formenting a color revolution — the same playbook that got banned him from Hungary, Russia, and others.
The No Kings protest is just his latest front in his personal war.
Millions in Soros-aligned philanthropy have underwritten Indivisible’s rise from a viral Google Doc to a nationwide political engine.
Whatever the banner, the money and machinery behind the No Kings protest traces back to the same source: Open Society’s network of influence.
There is an account who won’t allow me to reply accusing me of being a grifter because they think I’m implicating the wrong people instead of ex-USAID employees.
NED is *already* working hand-in-hand Soros via representatives such as Rachel Kleinfeld (as @SKDoubleDub33 is finding), Randi Weingarten (NDI; also was a spokesperson for the first NoKings rally), AFL-CIO (one of NED’s four charter foundations; their local chapters organize many of the NoKings rallies alongside local Indivisible chapters).
Open Society has a decades-long history of formenting color revolutions alongside the State Department. There isn’t a “bigger badder guy” than that particular hydra.
@SKDoubleDub33 Prior thread on these same ex-USAID employees; you can judge for yourself if they’re the masterminds or just part of the machinery:
Unroll available on Thread Reader
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=DataRepublican&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=true&id=1942340008276549776&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fthreadreaderapp.com%2Fthread%2F1977747923619488058.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dtopunroll&sessionId=25da4b341d70a69fb8b9ea18cd531da55cd02e26&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px
@SKDoubleDub33 Turns out these two people are the same ones who went viral recently for picking out US color revolution colors. So, yeah.
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=DataRepublican&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-1&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=true&id=1970593145089130823&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fthreadreaderapp.com%2Fthread%2F1977747923619488058.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dtopunroll&sessionId=25da4b341d70a69fb8b9ea18cd531da55cd02e26&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
Keep Current with DataRepublican (small r)
Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!
This Thread may be Removed Anytime!
Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!
@threadreaderapp unroll
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Oct 14
👀 𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗢𝗯𝗮𝗺𝗮’𝘀 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗮-𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲. 🔹 In college, Barack Obama helped co-found a local chapter of CISPES (Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador), a U.S. group that supported the FMLN, a Marxist guerrilla front fighting the U.S.-backed Salvadoran government. 🔹 CISPES often worked alongside the Nicaragua Network, which championed the Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua. (U.S. intelligence later confirmed that the Sandinistas supplied El Salvador’s rebels with weapons and training.) 🔹 As the solidarity scene matured: • 1985: Nicaragua Network + Detroit CISPES ➡️ merge → CASC (Central America Solidarity Committee) • 1993: CASC + MICAH ➡️ merge → OSCA (Organization in Solidarity with Central America) • 1998: Former Nicaragua Network activists incorporate the Alliance for Global Justice (AFGJ), folding their old network inside as a project. Today AFGJ still operates as a left-wing umbrella group … the same lineage that began with 1980s “solidarity” campaigns. So yes… the activist ecosystem that once rallied for Marxist guerrillas in Central America evolved, merged, and rebranded, and figures like Obama (via early CISPES work) and later Bill Ayers (through AFGJ-linked circles) both trace lines back into that same network.
CISPES (of which Obama founded a local chapter, according to David Garrow) was found to have furnished funds to Marxist rebels in El Salvador, in possible violation of the Firearms Control Act. They also met with FMLN, potentially violating FARA. The report goes onto detail other allegations that weren’t substantiated, such as CISPES taking direction from foreign governments on when and where to demonstrate.
I found a declassified CIA document that states that Farid Handal, brother of the Salvadoran Communist leader, traveled to meet with representatives of Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to create these solidarity networks in the USA — including CISPES.
Oct 3
Does anyone know how the SPLC is funded? They report receiving over $100MM in contributions each year, but CauseIQ shows they receive few large grants from other nonprofits; they report only 26MM and that’s over multiple years. That’s unusual. (And, no, they don’t report receiving government money.)
Best theory so far:
I think I’m onto something. They get paid as vendors by a ridiculous number of nonprofits:
Sep 24
🧵 THREAD: Richard Grenell: praising “diplomacy” with Maduro, Chevron, and the pro-Venezuelan MAGA faction 🇻🇪 Just last week, Grenell declared: “I’ve sat across from Nicolás Maduro… I believe we can still have a deal. I believe in diplomacy. I believe in avoiding war.” Maduro is a Communist tyrant who has upended hundreds of thousands of lives, Venezuela is the self-declared capital of Antifa, and serves as the Western hemisphere proxy for Chinese and Iranian interests. Why is President Trump’s special envoy talking like this on stage in Asunción? 🕳️🐇 The answer goes a lot deeper and darker than you’d think. This might be my most controversial thread yet… but it involves a whole lot of MAGA players who are invested in maintaining the status quo with Venezuela, mostly through Chevron oil licenses.
For a long time, Chevron has had its tentacles on MAGA. Back on May 6th, a coordinated messaging campaign went up among multiple mega-influencers. Two days after that, one of the most famous MAGA influencers wrote her first op-ed concerning Chevron and China messaging. I redact the name because I don’t want to make it about her.
This early May timing coincided with the threat to shut down Chevron leases on May 27. Earlier this year, Harry Sargeant III was identified as the one who opened up communications between Maduro and Grenell in an attempt to create an “oil-for-migrants” deal. His
Sep 20
@MrAndyNgo Here’s the account. Have fun.
@MrAndyNgo This might be the first case of “Democracy Theory” radicalizing a killer (as opposed to the usual trans/antifa motives). He followed all the democracy folks. Posted a lot about saving democracy.
Sep 19
. @SomeBitchIIKnow and I have been working all night. We believe we’ve cracked it. Venezuela. “Harm reduction” policies. Soros DA attorneys. Alliance for Global Justice. Action Network. Mutual aid collectives. Legal defense funds. Mass migration. Antifa — your days of operating in the shadow are up.
@SomeBitchIIKnow I’m going to bed now, but we’re gonna put it together for the public ASAP.
@SomeBitchIIKnow Need to get a good night’s sleep, still haven’t slept well since that awful day. Not easy to explain it all in one go! But I hope you’re starting to see bits and pieces from my comments today.
Sep 18
The Party of Socialism & Liberation (PSL) was in Caracas, Venezuela for the first International Anti-Fascist Festival.
👀 The festival was organized by none other than … the Maduro government. @AAGDhillon
@AAGDhillon Alliance for Global Justice quotes the official Cuban newspaper as repeating that Venezuela “is the capital of anti-Fascism”
Support us! We are indie developers!
This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.
Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!
Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)
Or Donate anonymously using crypto!
Ethereum
0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E
Bitcoin
3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi
Thank you for your support!
stock here: I don’t really watch The Young Turks that much. But it seems odd now that they are so anti-Israel.
There is some drone footage, and a lot of on foot, footage.
This is just 1:13 long, before and after drone footage.
Here is Gaza from 6 years ago.
Virginia Giuffre, hmmmm, I wonder why she wouldn’t make a video.
stock here: I get a ton of alternative viewpoints, many substack, to my protonmail accounts.
And this one started out well in parts 1 and 2, talking about RFK and the expected pushback.
And then flat earthers, reaching for the extreme, “you can’t isolate it, therefore it doesn’t exist. There are no viruses, there are no germs (bacteria).”
—————————–
I am going to make this counter argument in as few words as possible. Unlike George Webb, who spent 10 hours and 10 pages “proving” how the movements of the Kirk shooter were so elaborate and mostly unecessary, therefore they were just trying to fool us into what should we really believe. 10 hours, to miss the main point, the 22 YO jumping kid did not hit Kirk with a 30-Odd-6, he was a patsy of some sort, what did they promise him or what did they promised NOT to do to him. So don’t “pull a Webb”, who looks like he is drinking WAY too much.
Boom, if there are things that spread widely and wildly and often quickly, thus they are “going viral”, then even if you insist that something must be isolated and clearly defined by some super strict scientific methodology, or else they cannot be claimed to even exist, then you shouldn’t ignore that something is going viral, even if you dispute the definition.
If something acts like a virus, then it is a virus, regardless of what the nay-sayers want to say or define.
Clearly $10s of Billions of dollars are spent on virus research, including the insane “gain of function”. To claim that this is all smoke and mirrors, and has been for 60 years, is the realm of the flat earth.
stock here: 2 light skinned blacks being pushed to the top of the feed. Actually the CEO guy does seem good at keeping the convo going whilst not talking over the top of his guests. But he still seems like a “normie” in many respects, maybe to attract the normies to his show. I believe he is a CEO and a Billionaire, so it is odd that he participates in blog interviews. The slight English accent is particularly annoying to me.
Tyson, I have not figured out his place in the universe, if being pushed by some nefarious agencies, or if he is just out grifting for himself.
stock here: neve seen it before. I do have 2 books “Forward Freemasonry”. I was offered to join a fast track Freemason program to one of the few Jewish Freemason societies in city of Milwaukee, WI. I turned them down.
stock here:
stock here: I think this speaks volumes.
