https://www.facebook.com/reel/662871043261810/?rdid=j6XofV6Fc8P2NzHD#

This pimp has a ton of videos promoting his precious

From K in Hawaii

“At Will Ignorance”refers to the deliberate choice to remain uninformed — even when truth or knowledge is available and accessible. It’s not accidental ignorance, it’s willful.

You’re calling out a mindset where people:

* Choose not to look deeper, even when evidence is right in front of them

* Avoid responsibility, because knowing would mean they’d have to act

* Prefer comfort over truth, and routine over awareness

* Claim neutrality, but in doing so, support the status quo

It’s a criticism of those who could know better, should know better, but decide — at will — to stay blind.

————————————

A-Eye version

“At-Will Ignorance” isn’t just a lack of knowledge — it’s the rejection of it. It’s when people actively choose not to know, even when the truth is right in front of them. They avoid inconvenient facts, not because those facts are hidden, but because knowing would require responsibility, or worse — action. This mindset prefers comfort over truth, routine over awareness, and passive neutrality that silently upholds the status quo. It’s not accidental blindness — it’s willful. And in a world engineered to manipulate, that kind of ignorance is the system’s greatest ally.

stock here: A-Eye assist, Human guidance

Perfect — here’s your final amped-up version with a wink of conspiracy, a slap of truth, and your voice coming through strong:

How Amazingly Easy It Is to Manipulate Humans
by [Your Name]

It’s disturbingly easy. Manipulating humans isn’t some arcane science — it’s marketing with teeth. Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud, figured this out back in the 1920s. He didn’t just sell products — he sold ideas, identity, emotion. He didn’t push bacon; he sold the American Breakfast. He didn’t just promote cigarettes; he branded them as “Torches of Freedom” to hijack the women’s liberation movement.
Psychology, weaponized.
And it worked.

Fast forward to 2025: same playbook, but now it’s automated. AI + big data + zero accountability = population control on autopilot.

Let’s talk numbers.
Only 49% of web traffic comes from actual humans.
The rest? Bots.
But not just annoying bots — 37% are malicious, powered by AI, trained to manipulate what you see, think, and feel.
They drown real people in fake consensus, orchestrate social outrage, and hijack trending topics. These bots don’t argue — they amplify. They don’t care what side you’re on — just that you’re angry, tribal, and distracted.

Even Elon Musk had to ask: “How many real people are still on the internet?”

And here’s the kicker:
The people calling for censorship are using fake accounts to justify it.
Silencing real humans in the name of stopping fake ones.
Read that again.

Dr. Robert Malone says this isn’t accidental — it’s engineered. And he’s right. Just like the “conspiracy theory” that totally didn’t exist about Epstein’s flight logs. (Never mind the 70-page spreadsheet I personally downloaded. Shhh.)
They said that was fake. Then it was sealed. Then it was classified.
And now? It’s just… memory-holed.

They said the virus didn’t leak.
They said the laptop didn’t exist.
They said “nobody is coming for your rights.”
Then they did — three weeks later.

Because that’s the timeline now:
The difference between conspiracy theory and conspiracy fact? About 21 days.

And here’s a thought: If everything’s a coincidence, why is it all trending in the same direction?

It’s not about “left” or “right” — that’s just another illusion. The real divide is between the awake and the influenced.

Humans are still running on caveman firmware: we crave safety, tribe, and certainty. So when a message gets wrapped in identity and fear, and repeated enough times?
We believe it.
We defend it.
We attack anyone who questions it.

The algorithms know that. The bots exploit that.

And we… just scroll.

So before you share the next outrage headline, ask yourself:
Is this even real?
Or are you just a rat in a maze… built by people you’ll never meet?

Let me know if you want a shortened version for X (Twitter), Substack, or your blog — or if you’d like matching art/meme graphics.

🚨 How Amazingly Easy It Is to Manipulate Humans
by stock

It’s disturbingly easy. Manipulating humans isn’t some arcane art—it’s marketing with teeth. Edward Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud, figured this out back in the 1920s. He didn’t just sell products—he sold ideas, identity, emotion. He didn’t push bacon; he sold the American Breakfast. He didn’t just promote cigarettes; he branded them “Torches of Freedom,” hijacking the women’s liberation narrative. Psychology, weaponized. And it worked.

Fast forward to 2025: same playbook, but now automated. AI + Big Data + zero accountability = population control on autopilot.

🤖 Bot Takeover
Only 49% of web traffic is real humans.

The other 51%? Bots. When I see all the pretty girls on facebook that are suggested friends, half of them look AI, and usually have just 2 pictures in their profile, lazy arse AI.

A chilling 37% of those bots are malicious, designed to manipulate what you see, think, and feel.

They drown real humans in fake consensus, orchestrate outrage, hijack trends. Even Elon Musk asks, “How many real people are still on the internet?”

🧠 Engineered Manipulation
While bots run amok, you get censored—all in the name of “stopping disinformation.” Dr. Robert Malone warns this isn’t accidental—it’s engineered.

🔍 Conspiracies: The Thin, Blurry Line
They claimed Epstein had no flight logs. (I’ve downloaded my own 70-page file. LOL.)

The logs were labeled “fake,” then sealed, then classified, then they actually said the lists never existed.

They assured “nobody is coming for your rights.” Then three weeks later—boom.

Because now:
Conspiracy fact = yesterday’s conspiracy theory—in just 21 days.

My personal theory? The same network pushing bot armies and AI-comment armies is the one now calling for censorship—because that’s how you hide the setup.

🧬 Why It Works
Humans run on primal instincts—fear, belonging, identity. Wrap a narrative around tribe or terror, repeat it, and they react. They stop thinking. They defend. They attack. The algorithms know this—and bots exploit it.

Before you retweet, share, or rant—ask yourself:

Is this even real?

Who benefits from me believing it?

And where are the actual people in this conversation?

————————-

Written by a bot, LOL

stock here: it’s a super long interview. Wide ranging. Summary below. The Jews and the Persians.

Eric Weinstein Interview – Part 1 Summary

This summary covers the first half (~50 minutes) of Eric Weinstein’s recent interview, focusing on themes of science, geopolitics, technology, and civilizational decline.

1. Epstein, Intelligence & Science

• Weinstein suggests Jeffrey Epstein was likely connected to intelligence agencies and had insider knowledge of classified or sensitive scientific work.
• Epstein’s financier image was likely a cover. Weinstein was directed to meet Epstein by influential figures, raising suspicions.
• Weinstein is critical of the scientific establishment, claiming real innovation is suppressed and scientists are systematically ‘castrated’ to avoid shifting power structures.

2. Fragile Civilization & Geopolitics

• Weinstein believes we are in the early stages of World War III – a diffuse, global unraveling marked by escalating conflict, such as in Israel and Iran.
• Unlike the Cold War, modern threats are unpredictable and decentralized, from cyberattacks to drone warfare.
• Humanity is wielding enormous power without the maturity to use it responsibly.

3. Physics is the Key

• Weinstein argues that only a renaissance in physics can save us from stagnation and catastrophe.
• He praises Elon Musk’s engineering but criticizes the lack of investment in fundamental physics breakthroughs.
• He believes suppressed or forgotten physics could reshape the future.

4. Tools of Planetary Leverage

• We’ve developed tools that could trigger extinction, such as gene editing (e.g., COVID spike protein), LLMs (transformative AI), and blockchain (digital scarcity).
• These innovations give small groups or individuals enormous power, while civilization remains immature.

5. Earth: The Womb, Not the Home

• Weinstein warns that Earth is a fragile, single-atmosphere environment and not our final destination.
• He supports space colonization, quoting ‘You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here.’

6. Religion, Culture & Meaning

• Though an atheist, Weinstein says religion is crucial for structure and meaning.
• He criticizes modern cultures for prioritizing pleasure, autonomy, and dismantling traditions like family, while ignoring the cost of losing deep cultural scaffolding.

7. AI & AGI

• Weinstein is skeptical of AGI hype but acknowledges current AI is already revolutionary.
• Tools like AlphaFold signal that AI has automated many cognitive tasks and will continue outpacing human capacity.
• He uses cyborg chess as a metaphor—human + AI is good now, but AI will soon outperform alone.

End of Part 1 Summary.

Eric Weinstein Interview – Part 2 Summary

This summary continues from the midpoint of Eric Weinstein’s interview, focusing on his views about truth, censorship, societal collapse, technological risk, and personal responsibility.

8. The Problem with Lying

• Weinstein says the most dangerous problem facing civilization is that we now routinely lie or avoid truth at scale—especially in science, education, and media.
• He references ‘mathematical mendacity’—a system of false consensus where truth is distorted by elites to preserve institutional control.
• The cost of maintaining lies is exponential and will ultimately collapse trust in all authority.

9. COVID, Public Policy, and Hypocrisy

• Weinstein is critical of how governments and experts handled COVID—particularly censorship, public confusion, and the silencing of dissent.
• He notes that poor leadership and shifting narratives (e.g., masks, vaccines, origins) eroded public trust and undermined future emergency preparedness.

10. Modern Censorship & Digital Control

• Weinstein warns about the creeping rise of digital censorship and speech controls through algorithms, social media moderation, and financial deplatforming.
• He says open dialogue is essential to a functioning civilization—and that we are sliding toward soft authoritarianism.

11. Collapsing Institutions

• Universities, journalism, and science are losing legitimacy due to corruption, incompetence, and lack of innovation.
• Weinstein argues that these institutions are more interested in protecting their reputations than solving real problems.

12. Male Loneliness & Role Crisis

• He discusses the growing issue of male loneliness and societal confusion over masculine roles.
• Traditional male virtues like protection, leadership, and stoicism are now viewed with suspicion or dismissed.
• Weinstein believes this cultural rejection is harmful to both men and society at large.

13. What Can Be Done?

• Weinstein encourages people to stop participating in lies and corrupt systems.
• He emphasizes individual integrity, open speech, and pursuit of truth as the only path forward.
• He believes hope lies in people who still ‘see clearly’ and are willing to act even at personal cost.

14. Final Thoughts

• Weinstein says the future can be bright if we confront hard truths, revive suppressed science, and rebuild meaning.
• He closes by urging listeners to be brave, think deeply, and resist engineered narratives that divide us.

End of Part 2 Summary.

stock here

📚 Robert Maxwell & Peer Review as a Control Mechanism
Robert Maxwell—a flamboyant, controversial media magnate—acquired Pergamon Press in the early 1950s. He aggressively launched hundreds of scientific journals and, as early as 1951, pioneered the commercial use of institutional peer review .

Though widely lauded, this innovation also functioned as a gatekeeping system:

Maxwell’s rapid expansion meant academic journals became profitable commercial products

As you know, his now infmaous daughter, Ghislane, who was a helicopter pilot and submarine pilot, amazing girl, who also entrapped other girls in fairly abusive sex plots.

How Academic Science Gave Its Soul to the Publishing Industry

.

The new “peer review” model vetted manuscripts through external reviewers—effectively enforcing existing consensus and filtering out disruptive ideas

Critics argue peer review, in this form, became a tool to reinforce dominant paradigms and control narratives

So, when the speaker says “peer review is a myth” and tied it to Robert Maxwell and Pergamon/Elsevier’s control of journals like The Lancet and Nature, he’s pointing to how the system can be rigged to suppress innovation, consolidate influence, and favor establishment viewpoints.

stock here: I went to Road America with the North Woods Shelby Club, great day of racing, many classics, but also modern out of the box Corvettes and others. It was odd, I had the run of the entire course, able to drive anywhere on the infield. Took 1000 pictures.

stock here: this guy somehow connects with everyone. He did multiple videos in Hawaii.

That’s the entire article.

stock here: The Jesuit’s have aprimary oath, and they must have no greater loyalty, than to the Jesuit leadership, that loyalty exceed the loyalty to God. Don’t believe me, research it.

---

stock here:

They want to give masculinity a bad name. Like Tim Walz.

🚨 JUST IN: Tom Homan DEMOLISHES a heckler interrupting his speech at TPUSA

HOMAN: “This guy doesn't have the balls to be an ICE officer!"

"The ONLY thing that surprises me is that he doesn’t have purple hair and a nose ring"

"I GUARANTEE you this guy sits down to pee” 🤣🔥 pic.twitter.com/tEQEyGICS3

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 12, 2025

stock here: I did a mid-deep dive on this new American Pope, after the Jesuit POS. He is a socialist (at best) globalist, and liftist who will carry all the lies. He did a manuveur last week saying that a marriage can only be between a man and a woman (without defining what that is). I call that a mis-direction before he start laying out the leftist agenda. Which he is now doing.

———————–

https://readallaboutitnews.com/pope-leo-xiv-fell-apart-completely-with-this-stunt-that-left-traditional-catholics-shell-shocked/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=rabi_2943703546&utm_source=&utm_term=&utm_content=240198

Leo is doubling down on his predecessor’s controversial environmental agenda instead of focusing on core Catholic doctrine.

This is the same Pope who’s been called a “WOKE MARXIST POPE” by Trump ally Laura Loomer after his left-wing social media posts surfaced.²

Former Senator Rick Santorum, a devout Catholic, expressed serious concerns about Leo’s direction after the papal election.

“I have very little optimism about the new pontiff,” Santorum said during a Newsmax appearance.³

——————————————————— Look at this spin, amazing.

He warned that humanity’s “dominion over nature” shouldn’t become “tyrannical” but should be “a relationship of reciprocity.”

This kind of language sounds exactly like what you’d hear from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or other Democrat politicians pushing their Green New Deal agenda.

Leo also stressed that the Catholic Church’s involvement in the climate fight is based on the Social Doctrine of the Church, which he’s using to justify this radical departure from traditional Catholic priorities.

stock here: this is gutsy

If the world is interested in secret nuclear programs in the Middle East, there is a country that doesn’t allow ANY IAEA inspectors:

It’s Israel. https://t.co/rpACsIHo1G

— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) June 19, 2025

The parasite does not wish to fully kill it’s host, especially when it can steal nuclear weapons from host.

Israel Stole Their Nuclear Weapons From The US

Israel has a not-so-secret "secret" arsenal of nuclear weapons

…and that nuclear arsenal was stolen from the United States

Extending over the period from 1957 to 1978 more than 300 kilograms of uranium 235 (U-235) in the form… pic.twitter.com/06MC1sUFBP

— Bobby Thorne (@Bobby1_x) May 19, 2025

And they attack our Liberty, and those injured survivors who saw their friends and crew mates die, in a 2 hour attack were forced to sign NDAs. I always thought the event was 1 single missile, this is eye opening!

The Attack On The USS Liberty (🧵1/2)

The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, the USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force fighter jets and Israeli Navy torpedo boats that killed 34 US crew members, wounded 171 US crew members, and… pic.twitter.com/cyI7oNetVD

— Bobby Thorne (@Bobby1_x) May 19, 2025

Someone—maybe John Roberts—should explain to KBJ what writing an “opinion” entails.

One of many things KBJ clearly doesn’t understand—or chooses not to.

This is so cringe: pic.twitter.com/Pwicwmfqqr

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) July 8, 2025

stock here: i had to try 5 times to get the embed code….but check the comments, they are over whelmingly negative. Amazing they couldn’t even a muster a troll to say something supportive of her.

Summary of comments here:

🔎 Key Themes in the Comments:
🧠 Criticism of Legal Reasoning
Many commenters claim KBJ’s dissent or opinions are not grounded in legal logic but in emotion or personal belief (e.g., “based on her feelings,” “like a diary entry”).

Several say her arguments lack coherence or legal rigor and refer to her writing as “entry-level” or “nonsense.”

🎭 Perception of Performative or Theatrical Behavior
Accusations of grandstanding or dramatics during oral arguments: “goes on and on,” “interrupts others,” “spazzed out theater performance.”

Some mock her vocal tone or delivery as childish or unserious.

🏛 Objections to Identity-Based Appointment
Multiple comments refer to her as a “DEI appointment,” meaning her selection was based on diversity, equity, and inclusion rather than merit.

One user calls her “the DEI experiment,” another references “affirmative action,” and several say Biden appointed her because of her identity.

Some express disbelief that she graduated from Harvard Law.

🧾 Doubt of Authenticity or Qualification
Comments question whether she writes her own opinions or uses AI/staff exclusively.

One sarcastically references a “Temu Law Degree.”

Some suggest she lacks basic constitutional knowledge (e.g., “We are a republic, not a democracy”).

🖊 Autopen Allegation
At least two commenters claim or speculate that KBJ was appointed using an autopen signature, suggesting the process was illegitimate or rushed.

😡 Mockery and Personal Insults
Many comments cross into personal attacks:

Mocking her intelligence (“96 IQ”).

Mocking her speech level (“5th grade level”).

Using demeaning language (e.g., “stupid cow,” “sitcom theater kid”).

🧭 General Tone and Bias
This collection of comments is overwhelmingly negative, mocking, and deeply skeptical of KBJ’s qualifications, independence, and legitimacy as a justice. Most seem to originate from a right-leaning or anti-DEI perspective, with emotional language and identity-driven critique rather than detailed legal counterarguments.

stock here:

I thought SCOTUS opinions were supposed to provide legal analysis. Ketanji Brown Jackson seems to view them as a platform to express her feelings. Maybe she should have become an influencer instead of a Supreme Court justice.

She is only 54, we could be stuck with her for 30 years.

Was her appointment signed by Auto-Pen

Note the resemblance to the World Economic Forum

Someone—maybe John Roberts—should explain to KBJ what writing an “opinion” entails.

One of many things KBJ clearly doesn’t understand—or chooses not to.

This is so cringe: pic.twitter.com/Pwicwmfqqr

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) July 8, 2025

Attempted Impeachments

Impeachment of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

To remove a U.S. Supreme Court justice, the process is the same as impeachment for the President — and it’s extremely rare and difficult:

1. Impeachment by the House of Representatives requires a simple majority vote.
2. Conviction by the Senate requires a two-thirds vote.

Only one Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached (Samuel Chase in 1804), and none have ever been removed via impeachment.

Historical Attempts to Impeach Justices

Justice Samuel Chase (1804-1805)

Reason for Impeachment: Accused of political bias and arbitrary rulings in trials involving Democratic-Republican defendants.
Outcome: Impeached by the House in 1804. Acquitted by the Senate in 1805.
Significance: Set a precedent discouraging partisan impeachment of justices.

Justice William O. Douglas (1970)

Reason for Impeachment Attempt: Accused by House Minority Leader Gerald Ford of financial misconduct and poor judgment.
Outcome: Investigated by the House Judiciary Committee. No articles of impeachment filed.
Significance: Highlighted the broad and controversial interpretation of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’.

Justice Abe Fortas (1969)

Reason for Impeachment Talk: Accepted $20,000 from a foundation associated with a convicted stock manipulator.
Outcome: Resigned under pressure. No formal proceedings occurred.
Significance: His resignation avoided formal impeachment.

Chief Justice Earl Warren (1950s-60s)

Reason for Impeachment Talk: Accused by political opponents for liberal rulings, especially on civil rights cases.
Outcome: No impeachment resolution was filed.
Significance: Reflective of ideological attacks without substantive misconduct allegations.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh (2018, 2021)

Reason for Impeachment Calls: Allegations of perjury and sexual misconduct during confirmation hearings.
Outcome: Some members of Congress called for impeachment inquiries. No articles were filed.
Significance: Demonstrated modern polarization over Supreme Court confirmations.

——————————————- PROCESS FOR REMOVAL

To remove a U.S. Supreme Court justice, the process is the same as impeachment for the President — and it’s extremely rare and difficult:

🔨 1. Impeachment by the House of Representatives
The House must pass articles of impeachment by a simple majority vote (218 of 435 if all members vote).

The charges typically involve “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” — the same constitutional standard as for presidents.

⚖️ 2. Trial and Conviction by the Senate
The Senate then holds a trial, presided over by the Vice President (or sometimes the Chief Justice if the accused is the President).

To convict and remove the justice, two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict (67 of 100 senators if all are present).

📜 Historical Note
Only one Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached:

Justice Samuel Chase (1804) was impeached by the House for political bias and misconduct.

He was acquitted by the Senate in 1805, and remained on the bench.

No Supreme Court justice has ever been removed from office by impeachment.

🧷 Other Removal Scenarios (Extremely Rare or Theoretical)
Resignation – voluntary.

Death in office – common due to lifetime appointments.

Disability – there’s no formal procedure to remove a justice for mental or physical unfitness unless impeachment is used.

🔒 In Summary
Step Requirement Outcome
1 House majority Justice is impeached
2 Senate 2/3 vote Justice is removed

Removing a Supreme Court justice is meant to be difficult by design, to ensure judicial independence from political whims.

Seen on Twitter:

stock here: they should be able to prove all of this, and tell Hillary that if she doesn’t interfere to screw up the prosecution, she can live her natural life outside of bars, and use that to also defuse other potential actors…after first also showing them the dirt on themselves, the evidence, and the possible charges and jail terms. Combat!

🚨 JUST OUT FROM @POTUS! pic.twitter.com/UdXwr2Ml8C

— Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) July 10, 2025

stock here, never seen anything like this!

Video from Bowie, MD this evening 👀 pic.twitter.com/jvSnE3oUco

— DMV News Live (@DCNewsLive) July 9, 2025

stock here: he has credibility

I was the former physician to three presidents. Here’s the real story about Dr. Kevin O’Connor’s disgraceful appearance before Congress. pic.twitter.com/j4DMZaxfUh

— Ronny Jackson (@RonnyJacksonTX) July 10, 2025

stock here: got this in an email.

Stock, this is a longer email, but we have a big update for you.If you can’t stick around for every word, we’ll cut straight to the chase: The DNC is ramping up our work against Trump and his allies, but we can’t do it without your support. Organizing and legal battles aren’t cheap, and we count on grassroots supporters like you to power our fight to elect Democrats who will fight for working families and communities nationwide. If this work matters to you, please consider donating $3 to the DNC today >>If you’ve stored your info with ActBlue, we’ll process your contribution instantly.CONTRIBUTE $3Here are the three things you need to know right now: TRUMP’S BUDGET BILL HAS BEEN SIGNED INTO LAW This bill represents the largest transfer of wealth from the working class to the billionaire class in US history. It will cut Medicaid and food assistance (like SNAP) for millions of Americans — while handing the ultrawealthy a giant tax break. Taking back Congress will be the key to stopping more harmful legislation like this — and that work has to start now. WE’VE OFFICIALLY LAUNCHED ORGANIZING SUMMER This summer, the DNC is investing in organizers in every state — red, blue, and purple — across the country to ensure that we’re reaching as many voters as we can. Taking back Congress and electing down-ballot Democrats who will fight against Trump and his allies is our highest priority right now, and we’re excited to get folks across the country involved. WE’RE FIGHTING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IN COURT TO PROTECT OUR ELECTIONS Since Inauguration Day, the Trump administration has been trying to rewrite longstanding campaign finance laws, overturning decades of precedent. The DNC, along with the DSCC and DCCC, have filed a motion asking the Supreme Court to allow us to defend the federal election law that sets limits on coordinated party expenditures against the Republican Party’s challenge. This motion has been granted. We’re fighting like hell against the Trump administration and its allies to protect our democracy and the American people. But organizing nationwide and taking the administration to court won’t be cheap. Steven, we’re counting on your support to help us hold this administration and the Republican majority accountable. Please pitch in $3 to the DNC to help us elect Democrats up and down the ballot who will fight for the American people.

I saw the F1 Movie last night and it was excellent in many ways. A GOAT.

https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/christian-horner-let-go-by-red-bull-after-20-years-as-f1-team-principal-242974789820