stock here: shame on them. I trust the volcano more than I trust Hannity. See below for live eruptions at Kilauea
Category: Uncategorized
Categories
Ultra Processed “Foods”
Having a home cooked meal last night with a friend, and he mentions his older brother takes 3 type of ultra processed foods, and then cooks with them, and feels like he is eating healthy, LOL. Let’s see what A-Eye has to say about these issues.
Ultra-Processed Foods: Definition, Ingredients, and Examples
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are industrially manufactured food products that contain little to no whole food ingredients and are made primarily from refined substances, food additives, and synthetic compounds. They often contain high levels of sugar, salt, unhealthy fats, preservatives, artificial flavors, and emulsifiers that extend shelf life and enhance taste, texture, and appearance.
Examples of Ultra-Processed Foods
Some common examples of ultra-processed foods include:
- Snack Foods & Packaged Treats Potato chips, corn chips, cheese puffs
Candy bars, chocolate-coated snacks
Store-bought cookies, cakes, and pastries - Sugary and Artificial Beverages Soda, energy drinks, and sports drinks
Sweetened iced teas and flavored coffee beverages
Artificially flavored fruit drinks - Processed Meats & Imitation Meats Hot dogs, chicken nuggets, and fish sticks
Deli meats with preservatives (salami, bologna)
Plant-based meat alternatives with artificial binders - Instant and Ready-to-Eat Meals Boxed macaroni and cheese, instant noodles, ramen
Frozen dinners (TV dinners, microwave burritos)
Powdered soup mixes and dehydrated meal kits - Breakfast Cereals & Granola Bars Sugary cereals with artificial colors and flavors
Pre-packaged granola bars with high-fructose corn syrup
Flavored instant oatmeal packets with added sweeteners - Breads and Bakery Items with Additives Pre-sliced white bread with emulsifiers
Store-bought muffins and bagels with preservatives
Mass-produced pizza dough with chemical conditioners - Dairy and Dairy Alternatives with Additives Flavored yogurts with artificial sweeteners
Processed cheese products (cheese spreads, imitation cheese)
Non-dairy creamers with hydrogenated oils and emulsifiers
What Makes a Food “Processed” or “Ultra-Processed”?
The level of processing determines whether a food is classified as processed or ultra-processed:
Minimally Processed Foods – These foods undergo little alteration from their natural state. Examples include washed and bagged salad greens, frozen vegetables, and dried beans.
Processed Foods – Foods that have been modified for convenience, flavor, or preservation. Examples include canned vegetables, salted nuts, and whole-grain bread.
Ultra-Processed Foods – Foods that contain industrially derived ingredients not found in home kitchens, often with artificial flavors, colors, and preservatives.Common Ingredients in Ultra-Processed Foods:
Artificial Sweeteners: Aspartame, sucralose, saccharin
Hydrogenated Oils & Trans Fats: Partially hydrogenated soybean oil, margarine
High-Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS): Cheap sugar substitute linked to metabolic disorders
Preservatives & Emulsifiers: Sodium nitrite, potassium sorbate, carrageenan
Artificial Flavors & Colors: Red 40, Yellow 5, Blue 1
Modified Starches & Gums: Maltodextrin, xanthan gum, guar gum
Flavor Enhancers: Monosodium glutamate (MSG), yeast extractWhat Constitutes a “Large Amount” of Ultra-Processed Food?
The exact definition of a “large amount” varies by study, but excessive consumption is generally considered:
Over 50% of total daily calories from ultra-processed foods
Frequent consumption of processed meals, snacks, and beverages daily
Relying on packaged, convenience foods as primary meals instead of whole foodsScientific Studies on Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Risks
Several studies have linked ultra-processed food consumption to negative health outcomes:
Monteiro et al., 2018 (BMJ Study) – Found a correlation between high UPF consumption and increased risk of obesity and metabolic disorders.
Srour et al., 2019 (JAMA Internal Medicine) – Demonstrated a link between high UPF consumption and an increased risk of all-cause mortality.
Hall et al., 2019 (Cell Metabolism Study, NIH) – Conducted a controlled trial showing that ultra-processed foods lead to higher calorie intake and weight gain compared to minimally processed diets.
Fiolet et al., 2018 (BMJ Study) – Indicated a potential association between ultra-processed food intake and increased cancer risk.
Pagliai et al., 2021 (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition) – Suggested that diets rich in ultra-processed foods contribute to cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.Final Thoughts
Ultra-processed foods are convenient, tasty, and widely available, but their high levels of artificial ingredients, unhealthy fats, and refined sugars pose significant health risks when consumed frequently. Reducing intake and focusing on whole, minimally processed foods can improve overall health and reduce the risk of chronic diseases.
stock here
Alberta government COVID-19 review calls for immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, citing safety concerns
The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.
The review was initiated in 2022 under the leadership of Dr. Gary Davidson, a clinical lead in emergency medicine in central Alberta. Dr. Davidson was tasked with evaluating the pandemic’s response, focusing on various aspects such as non-pharmaceutical interventions (masking and lockdowns), the accuracy of predictive modelling, and the role regulatory bodies played in the response. Experts like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Byram Bridle, and Dr. David Speicher contributed to the investigation, each bringing their expertise to bear on a comprehensive assessment of pandemic policies.
Among the most striking findings of the report is the task force’s criticism of Health Canada’s decision-making process for the rushed to market novel modified RNA injections. The group points out that there were “significant gaps” in the data supporting the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, Health Canada has failed to disclose whether a proper risk assessment was ever conducted to justify the widespread use of these vaccines in individuals under 18, particularly considering the lack of long-term clinical data.
One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination. Notably, nearly half of these adverse events occurred in individuals aged 18-50—those at negligible risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This troubling information calls into question the overall safety profile of the vaccines, especially in young and healthy populations.
The report also discusses the known risks associated with the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the modified RNA and spike protein into cells. These synthetic fat molecules have a well-documented toxicity profile, and there are concerns about the long-term health impacts of repeated doses. Furthermore, the review raises alarms over the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two heart conditions that can have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences, particularly for young individuals.
Another critical aspect addressed in the Alberta report is the rushed approval process for these vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. The review underscores that while such a pathway is easier to navigate in times of crisis, it becomes incredibly challenging to reverse decisions once questions about safety arise. The task force also points out the difficulty of obtaining accurate data on vaccine safety and efficacy within Alberta’s publicly funded healthcare system, making it almost impossible to conduct independent analysis or verification of safety claims made.
The Alberta report draws attention to the discrepancies in the clinical trials, which were plagued by inadequate follow-up, missing data, and conflicts of interest. The interim findings of Pfizer’s clinical trial revealed that 21 deaths occurred in the vaccinated group compared to 17 in the placebo group, with an alarming 3.7-fold increase in cardiac events. Moreover, the report highlights issues with underreporting adverse events, noting that only 1-10% of adverse events were properly documented.
Even more concerning is the data on pregnant women, which reveals a devastating 87.5% fetal/neonatal mortality rate in the limited trials conducted. These findings, alongside the acknowledged risks of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, underscore the need for a re-evaluation of the vaccines’ safety profile.
Despite the mounting evidence, the public health narrative has largely ignored these critical concerns, dismissing them as misinformation. However, the Alberta review demands transparency, accountability, and a rigorous risk-benefit analysis moving forward. As the province calls for a halt to the use of these vaccines in healthy young individuals, the question remains: will these calls be heeded, or will the push for blanket vaccination recommendations continue unchecked?
The review emphasizes the need for a more cautious, evidence-based approach in future pandemic responses, prioritizing transparency and informed consent over knee-jerk policies.
The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.
Categories
Usury Is As Evil As Ever
stock here: look at these bankers “upset” with a $125,000 bonus
stock here, not many degrees of separation.
Categories
LA 2.0 All Part of the Plan
Brush Junkie, LA 2.0. It’s a Plan.
stock here: energy, gov policy, and inflation. I spent $1350 last night on “miscellaneous” at Lowes, it was 1 cart.
Energy: A Key Factor in Inflation, But Not the Only One
Inflation has been a hot topic of discussion for decades, and while the causes of inflation are multifaceted, energy costs are undeniably a significant factor. However, they are far from the sole driver of the broad, generalized price increases we’ve experienced in recent years. To understand how energy plays into the bigger picture, we must also consider the overarching influence of monetary policy, government edicts, and other economic dynamics.
Inflation and Money Supply: The Core Driver
At its root, inflation is largely a monetary phenomenon. When the money supply grows faster than the real economy—defined as the total goods and services available—it results in too much money chasing too few goods. For example, if the economy grows by 3% but the money supply increases by over 40%, widespread price increases become inevitable. This isn’t speculative; it’s a well-established principle of economics.
During the Carter administration, the concept of money velocity—how quickly money circulates in the economy—and measures like M2 and M3 were central to discussions about inflation. Paul Volcker, as chairman of the Federal Reserve, famously used these tools to curb the inflation of the late 1970s and early 1980s. His focus was on controlling the money supply and reducing its velocity, effectively breaking the inflationary spiral.
Energy as a Catalyst for Inflation
Energy costs, however, play a critical role in shaping inflation. The Arab oil shocks of the 1970s were a stark reminder of how rising energy prices can ripple through the economy. High energy costs increase the price of production, transportation, and goods, leading to wage-price spirals as businesses and workers adjust to rising costs.
Today, energy remains central to inflationary pressures. As the cost of oil, gas, and electricity rises, it impacts nearly every sector of the economy. Recognizing this, policymakers like former President Trump emphasized energy independence and cost reduction as a strategy to combat inflation. Lower energy costs not only reduce the direct price of fuel but also mitigate secondary price increases in goods and services.
Government Edicts and Localized Price Spikes
Beyond energy and monetary policy, government regulations and mandates also contribute to inflation, particularly in localized areas. Policies like rent control or mandated wage increases for specific sectors, such as hotel workers, can lead to sharp price increases in housing or services. These localized pressures are distinct from generalized inflation but can exacerbate the overall cost-of-living crisis in affected areas.
The Debt Bubble and the Dollar’s Decline
Inflation is also tied to broader economic strategies, such as the decision to inflate the money supply to address debt burdens without raising taxes. This tactic effectively allows governments to pay back borrowed money with devalued currency, eroding the purchasing power of the dollar. However, this approach has long-term consequences, including declining global confidence in the dollar as a reserve currency.
Countries seeking alternatives to the dollar for trade are a direct response to its diminishing value. Economically, it’s hard to blame them. For those with investments in hard assets or inflation-resistant stocks, inflation can be a windfall. However, for young families and first-time buyers, inflation has made homeownership increasingly unattainable, weakening their stake in communities and encouraging transient lifestyles centered around consumption rather than equity building.
The Bigger Picture
Inflation is a complex beast with many contributing factors. While energy costs are a visible and impactful driver, they are just one piece of a larger puzzle. The primary engine of widespread inflation remains changes in the money supply. At the same time, government policies, global trade dynamics, and energy prices amplify and shape the specific contours of inflation.
For a sustainable solution, policymakers must address these factors holistically. Controlling energy costs, stabilizing monetary policy, and fostering equitable economic growth are all critical components. Without coordinated action, inflation will continue to act as a hidden tax, disproportionately benefiting the few while pricing out the many.
This nuanced understanding of inflation highlights the interplay between energy, monetary policy, and government actions. By addressing each factor strategically, we can build a more resilient economy that supports growth and opportunity for everyone.
Categories
UK Column, A Site Worth Reviewing
stock here: Odd to the have the Brits so un-woke…..check them out.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/
Categories
Caldera Chemistry
stock here: from my brother, who understands some of my research. I will be visiting the Big Island, next month.
stock here: This guy covered Lahaina like a Champ until his YouTube was Shutdown. I should copy this to Bitchute.
PRO TIP: When they start jacking up your home insurance rates, and cancelling policies en masse in your area….either build a pool with a gas pump always available to protect your structure, or just sell and move….since THEY are going to be burning your neighborhood down. They detest private owned properties, and also detest single family homes.
A-Eye transcript
Zoning and Housing Laws
0:00 – Starting to relax some of the zoning laws, especially in working-class neighborhoods like Altadena. Developers are now allowed to build duplexes and apartments. However, this change is raising significant concerns:
“If we close one station or resource, the residents of Los Angeles will pay the ultimate sacrifice, and someone will die,” critics argue.
Crowley, appointed in 2022, has been accused of doing little to address potential catastrophes caused by underfunding and resource cuts to the LAFD.
Potential Beneficiaries of the Crisis
0:34 – Los Angeles fires could have been avoided if the necessary actions were taken. The transcript asks, “Who benefits from this destruction?”
Leo Ptil Nikov:
Real estate developer and founder of SLH Investments.
Purchased 17 buildings on Skid Row for $10 million and gained 1,200 units in downtown LA. The deal included $9 million for repairs and renovations.
History of flipping properties: For instance, sold Baltimore and King Edward hotels after limited renovations, profiting $10 million.
Builder Remedy:
Legal tool allowing developers to bypass zoning restrictions if municipalities fail to comply with state housing laws.
Requires 20% of units to be low-income, but only for up to 30 years.
Environmental and Political Challenges
5:01 – Local communities are resisting these developments:
LA Superior Court ruled against Leo’s mixed-use project at the former Sea Lab site due to non-compliance with the Coastal Act.
Governor Newsom’s executive orders are seen as favoring developers by suspending environmental reviews.
5:49 – Insurance challenges further exacerbate the situation:
Post-fire homeowners struggle with canceled insurance policies or skyrocketing premiums.
Examples include:
Claims based on drone imagery leading to canceled policies.
Premiums rising tenfold or more for some homeowners.
Insurers rejecting valid claims or ignoring professional assessments.
Impact on Working-Class Communities
6:50 – Many people in LA are unable to rebuild their homes after fires due to insurance issues and rising costs.
Developers are poised to replace single-family homes with high-rise buildings, taking advantage of Builder Remedy laws.
Billionaire investors benefit from long-term strategies, while working-class families lose their homes and communities.
Political Accountability
8:32 – Criticism of Gavin Newsom:
Accused of enabling developers and failing to protect vulnerable communities.
Allegations of receiving financial backing from entities like PG&E, which faced federal felony charges.
10:00 – Role of other politicians:
Karen Bass criticized for cutting the LAFD budget by $23 million during a critical time.
These decisions are linked to reduced resources for fire prevention and emergency responses.
Insurance and Financial Manipulations
11:00 – Examples of insurance challenges:
Residents in Paradise, CA, faced similar issues post-fires.
Insurance premiums for survivors are unaffordable, pushing people to abandon their properties.
PG&E’s $13.5 billion settlement for damages left victims with less than 1% compensation after a year.
Broader Implications
12:00 – Builder Remedy’s potential long-term impact:
High-rise developments replacing single-family homes.
Investment firms like BlackRock poised to benefit.
Politicians face criticism for enabling the erosion of community-oriented living.
Federal Investigations
13:00 – Developments in national politics:
James Comer, Chair of the House Oversight Committee, calls for the prosecution of James Biden, alleging he lied to Congress.
Allegations that Hunter and James Biden benefited financially through their relationship with President Biden.
Conclusion
15:00 – The transcript raises concerns about:
Developers and politicians exploiting crises for financial gain.
The loss of community values in favor of high-rise developments.
The need for holding politicians accountable to ensure the protection of vulnerable communities.
This comprehensive analysis highlights the intersection of environmental crises, political decisions, and economic exploitation. It underscores the urgent need for transparent governance and community-focused solutions.
stock here, from Twitter. An A-Eye summary below.
Leave your final thoughts or parting words for Joe Biden below 👇 pic.twitter.com/SDlWg097HR
— HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) January 20, 2025
The replies you provided are overwhelmingly negative and dismissive. Here’s a summarized overview of the tone and content:
General Sentiment:
Most comments reflect anger, disdain, or relief, with many users expressing a desire for the individual to leave or be gone permanently.
Common Themes:
Good Riddance: Many responses say "bye," "adios," or variations of "good riddance."
Personal Attacks: Some use insults or explicit language to express disapproval (e.g., "FU," "crook," "shitbag").
Sarcasm or Jokes: A few replies include sarcastic remarks, such as "Check your Depends" and references to cognitive tests like "apple, penny, table."
Emotional Relief: Some commenters celebrate what they perceive as the end of a "nightmare" and reclaiming their "county."
Tone:
The tone is overwhelmingly negative, often blunt or vulgar.
A few replies, like "goodbye and good luck," attempt to stay neutral or cordial, but they are exceptions.Overall, the feedback reflects strong dissatisfaction and frustration, with a mix of humor, sarcasm, and outright hostility. Let me know if you’d like more insight into specific responses!
stock here: This is shocking even to me. This poster covered Lahaina in depth, until his YouTube was shut down.
🚨#BREAKING: Trump just admits on live tv that "SOMETHING HIT" LA and caused the fires.
— HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) January 24, 2025
⚠️"It looks like…I don't want to say what it looks like."
⚠️"We won't talk about what HIT IT."
⚠️"It is a bad bad situation."
What do you think he's referring to? pic.twitter.com/GWEJ4nBorI
stock here: they say that the skin is our body’s largest organ. Wouldn’t it make sense then, to have healthy, rejuvenated skin? Makes you look younger also. So check it out. It’s only been over the counter since 2016. It’s a cream that is sunlight stable.
Adapalene is a topical medication primarily used to treat acne. It is a retinoid-like compound that modulates skin cell growth and inflammation. Here’s an overview of adapalene, its creation, and its discovery:
What is Adapalene?
Type of Drug:
Adapalene is a third-generation retinoid, closely related to Vitamin A derivatives.
It is sold under brand names like Differin and available both as a prescription and over-the-counter medication.
Uses:
Primarily prescribed for the treatment of mild to moderate acne.
Sometimes used for other skin conditions like keratosis pilaris or photoaging (off-label).
Mechanism of Action:
Reduces inflammation: Adapalene inhibits the inflammatory process associated with acne.
Promotes cell turnover: It normalizes the shedding of dead skin cells, preventing clogged pores.
Antimicrobial action: It reduces the growth of bacteria that contribute to acne, such as Cutibacterium acnes.How is Adapalene Created?
Chemical Structure:
Adapalene is a synthetic naphthoic acid derivative and is not structurally identical to first-generation retinoids (like tretinoin).
Its structure makes it more stable in sunlight and less irritating compared to earlier retinoids.
Synthesis:
Adapalene is synthesized through a multi-step chemical process involving:
Napthoic acid derivatives: A key precursor that forms the base structure.
Carboxylic acids and aromatic substitutions: These allow for specific binding properties to skin cell receptors.
The process ensures that adapalene selectively binds to retinoic acid receptor beta (RAR-beta) and gamma (RAR-gamma), which are responsible for its anti-inflammatory and acne-fighting effects.Who Discovered Adapalene?
Discovery:
Adapalene was developed by researchers at the French pharmaceutical company Laboratoires Galderma in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
It was designed to improve upon earlier retinoids like tretinoin by reducing irritation while maintaining efficacy.
FDA Approval:
Adapalene was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1996 as a prescription medication for acne.
It became available over-the-counter (OTC) in 2016, making it the first retinoid approved for OTC use in the United States.Why is Adapalene Significant?
It represents a milestone in acne treatment due to its improved safety profile and effectiveness compared to earlier retinoids.
Its chemical stability allows for easier storage and use during the day, unlike other retinoids that degrade quickly in sunlight.If you’d like more detail about its synthesis or usage recommendations, let me know!
stock here: Kim fell off my radar, she never questioned vaccines before COVID. She is still doing good work.
Categories
John Ratcliffe — New CIA Director
stock here: can he clean house? This image is disturbing, does he not understand 911?
John Lee Ratcliffe, born on October 20, 1965, in Mount Prospect, Illinois, is an American politician and attorney known for his significant roles in national security and intelligence. He earned a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Notre Dame in 1987 and a Juris Doctor from Southern Methodist University in 1989. Early in his career, Ratcliffe served as the Mayor of Heath, Texas, from 2004 to 2012, and later represented Texas’s 4th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2015 to 2020. He was appointed as the 6th Director of National Intelligence (DNI) from 2020 to 2021 and, as of January 2025, serves as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Wikipedia
Early Life and Education
Ratcliffe was raised in a family of educators, being the youngest of six children. He graduated from Carbondale Community High School in Illinois before pursuing higher education at the University of Notre Dame and Southern Methodist University. His academic background laid a strong foundation for his future endeavors in law and public service.
Facts.net
Legal and Political Career
Before entering politics, Ratcliffe worked as a federal prosecutor and was the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas. He also partnered with former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft in a law firm, providing strategic legal advice on national and international security issues.
Congress.gov | Library of Congress
In Congress, Ratcliffe was recognized as one of the most conservative members. In 2016, the Heritage Foundation ranked him as the most conservative Texas legislator and the second-most conservative in the nation.
Wikipedia
He was a member of the House Intelligence, Homeland Security, and Judiciary committees, where he focused on national security and cybersecurity issues. Notably, he chaired the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection during the 115th Congress.
John Ratcliffe
Director of National Intelligence
As DNI, Ratcliffe served as the principal intelligence advisor to President Donald Trump and led the U.S. intelligence community, comprising 18 federal agencies, including the CIA and NSA. His tenure was marked by efforts to address threats from nations like China and Russia, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to enhance its technological capabilities in areas such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing.
Associated Press
CIA Director
In January 2025, Ratcliffe was confirmed by the Senate as the Director of the CIA. During his confirmation hearing, he pledged to keep the agency apolitical and to focus on countering threats from adversaries, particularly China. He emphasized the importance of enhancing the CIA’s technological capabilities to address modern challenges.
New York Post
Political Stance
Ratcliffe is widely regarded as a staunch conservative. His legislative record and policy positions align closely with conservative principles, and he has been a strong supporter of former President Trump. There is no substantial evidence to suggest that he is a “Republican In Name Only” (RINO); rather, his actions and statements consistently reflect conservative ideology.
Wikipedia
Personal Life
John Ratcliffe is married to Michele Ratcliffe, and they have two daughters. While specific details about his religious beliefs are not extensively documented, his background and public service suggest a commitment to family and community values.
Throughout his career, Ratcliffe has been a prominent figure in U.S. politics, particularly in areas related to national security and intelligence. His leadership roles and policy positions have significantly influenced the nation’s approach to emerging global threats.
stock here: this proof was easy enough to obtain with 20 minutes of work, although the trolls have been obvious for months. Spreading lies like “of course rebuilding is still going to take time….they are still collecting DNA so every victim can be identified”. That lie was yesterday, I showed not just the troll, but Facebook stating that the troll has 1200 friends when in fact the troll had ZERO friends, and just 1 weird post about a surf bay in California.
It was my account that was cancelled, without notice or chance for appeal, or chance to take down my post on my site. It was cancelled within 12 hours of my post at Nukepro.
Mr. Zuckerberg, are you guilty of conspiracy to cover up murder by fire, and illegal land grabs? The more you try to look human, the more your true evilness with that Chinese wife is apparent.
stock here: They are trying to slow walk the rebuild, and keep people just out of there. Today’s post states
Maui police arrest man, 39, in restricted zone. And then this old picture pretending that things are a total mess, and “dangerous”.
There are a number of trolls on here “selling the lies” about this arrest, and stay away, and don’t even go there as it is disrespectful.
So here is the Aaron troll, after man-splaining about DNA……
stock here: These assholes are trying to re-write history, now for sure some MAGA types are going to start mass murdering some trans and gay boys. At least before we get a new FBI director. Actually, Obama had this long game clearly in his playbook, as he added in those terms in 2014….but the game being played now is to point as far back as Johnson, as if those sex terms were in there forever, and now Trump is screwing with it.
Curious Enough, in the last days of the Biden Admin, they made 2 additional changes in the last 2 weeks, on Jan 10, 2025 and Jan 15, 2025, I wonder what kind of skullduggery they could have buried in there. Here’s the proof.
stock here: you can skim it pretty quick, it’s worth a look
Scroll to the bottom for current events
I’ll try copying the links directly
stock here: Shame on them, they are pretending that the issue is that for a baby born in the USA, that the intent of the law was to make the whole family of ancesters citizens. And that is absurd, so they conclude that for sure the baby will be a citizen, AKA an anchor baby. The use of “jurisdiction” is key IMHO. Judge that word by the last sentence….anyone physically present, if that presence made them under “Jurisdiction” then the same amendment would instantly and completely give them the “Equal protection of all of our laws” which in my view would be patently absurd. I present 4 A-Eye options for labels to give the illegals, that differentiates from “Jurisdiction”, I also proposed “Under Control”.
The exact language related to birthright citizenship in the U.S. Constitution is found in the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, which states:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."Key Elements:
"Born or naturalized in the United States": Establishes that individuals born on U.S. soil or those who become citizens through the naturalization process are U.S. citizens.
"Subject to the jurisdiction thereof": This clause has been interpreted to mean that individuals born in the U.S. are citizens, except for certain exceptions like children of foreign diplomats, enemy combatants, or sovereign Native American tribes (prior to specific legislation such as the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924).
Privileges and Protections: The amendment also emphasizes that all citizens have the same legal protections and rights under federal and state laws.This clause in the Fourteenth Amendment is the basis for the principle of jus soli (right of the soil), which grants citizenship based on birthplace. The interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” has been central to debates over birthright citizenship in the U.S.