Month: February 2022
Dr. Robert Malone in some other videos with Mattias Desmet, Mattias corrects Dr. Malone on the addition of “psychosis” on the now famous Joe Rogan Experience.
Mattias explained that the Mass Formation is not truly a form of psychosis at all.
What I discovered though is that Mass Formation is but a symptom that naturally develops from another psychological tool of warfare called, “Ideological Subversion”.
Ideological Subversion is actually a weapon of war that Communists deployed upon America shortly after WWII. Yuri Bezmenov, a Russian KGB defector told us everything we should have been paying attention to. He revealed back in 1985 in many interviews how Ideological Subversion was already on its way to control the minds of the masses.
Great material worth checking out.
I uploaded a 15 minute compelling video that explains how the system actually works. When you understand that as the basis of what has taken place, Mass Formation naturally evolves from that system.
Many people were not aware that WW2 never stopped after military victory. During the time of “peace” that came after, communism wasn’t defeated. Marxists launched an incredibly successful attack upon the minds of the Free World.
This attack is called Ideological Subversion. It’s intent is to brainwash an unsuspecting public, teachers, politicians and business CEO’s to believe in something that goes against any form of religion, faith, patriotism and so much more.
The brainwashing is so strong that those that are under its influence cannot be swayed by facts, logic or data. Any objective facts are immediately dismissed by these people.
Entire generations of people have been ideologically subverted. Yuri Bezmenov warned us of what was taking place 35 years ago, and we didn’t listen. Now we are paying the price for our ignorance.
“These government traitors to freedom are suppressing the rights of the very people they claim to honor…” – Canadian Army Major Stephen Chledowski
The Canadian Armed Forces are once again targeting one of their high-ranking officers who has spoken out against government-ordered mandates and authoritarian restrictions. Canada is the latest left-wing government to target military or police officers defending their nation’s constitution.
Canadian Major Stephen Chledowski
A powerful video by Canadian Army Major Stephen Chledowski, in uniform, appeared on social media Thursday, as thousands of citizens remain in Ottawa for the Truckers Freedom Convoy. It also came as massive numbers of serving military personnel faced the threat of forced removal from the Armed Forces for refusing to be injected with the controversial mRNA gene therapy.
In the video transcribed by RAIR Foundation USA, Maj. Chledowski describes himself as a father, a soldier of nearly 21 years, and a veteran of Afghanistan. The unvaccinated soldier professed his love and commitment to the people of Canada, their human rights, freedoms, and bodily autonomy throughout his almost seven-minute speech on YouTube before they removed it.
The left-wing media immediately seized on the video, painting Maj. Chledowski as an extremist who is working against his government. On the contrary, the military hero called on his government leaders to stop stripping Canadian citizens of the freedoms that he fought to protect. Furthermore, he encouraged others who vowed to protect and honor the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as other signed International Human Rights Agreements” to remember their oath.
Read and listen to Maj. Chledowski’s words instead of Canada’s left-wing Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau’s, his military figureheads, and state, paid-for media slander.
Good day, folks; my name is Major Stephen Chledowshi. I have served Canada in the Canadian armed forces for 20 plus years.
I hold a first-class honors degree in political science, and I have held several army command positions. I have an urgent message for all Canadians.
For nearly two years, our own elected government officials have been using the bullying tactics of fear, intimidation, coercion, and financial and physical violence against us to gain compliance for certain repeated medical procedures.
We tell our children that bullying is wrong. We know it to be so yet, we allow our leaders to do this to us. They have knowingly and repeatedly violated the highest laws of the land in the Canadian Charter of rights and Freedoms as well as other signed International Human Rights Agreements.
Canadians have been lulled into believing that the same government that suppresses your freedoms in the name of safety will one day just reward you back with your freedoms. If you just comply to ever-changing rules and health orders. That, folks, is the very definition of tyranny, not democracy.
Humans are inherently free; kings and queens and government cronies can give you can’t give you your basic human rights; they are naturally yours. They can’t be given; they can’t be taken; they can only be suppressed. In the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Queen Elizabeth is recognizing in law are fundamental freedoms. The federal and provincial governments of Canada have chosen through a well-planned and orchestrated set of measures to trick and fool and scare you, the very people who elected them and pay their salaries, into complying with the suppression of our basic human rights. They have knowingly betrayed you and me under the lie of safety.
This past Remembrance Day, as I stood in front of the military cenotaph in Fredericton to honor my comrades who gave their lives for others freedom, I overheard the premier of New Brunswick, Premier Higgs, and our member of Parliament Jenica Atwin tell members of the public how special it was that these brave members of the military gave their lives for their freedom. That same freedom that these very liars and deceivers are actively working right now to suppress.
I stood there a soldier of nearly 21 years as a senior officer in the Canadian army, as a veteran of Afghanistan participating in Operation Medusa, the largest combat operation for Canada since the Korean War – where I watched my own brave comrades fight and get injured and die. But I also stood there as a person who hasn’t taken the Covid-19 injection.
The irony so even though I serve this country, and it has been an honor to do so, an absolute honor like many thousands of Canadians who choose body autonomy and pro-choice, I am unable to share in the same privileges now like, eating at a restaurant going out in public to an event or even traveling across provinces to see my child. This is happening to many others; these government traitors to freedom are suppressing the rights of the very people they claim to honor, and it made me sick to my stomach.
These Canadian governments are now focused on our children with a medical genetic therapy proven by repeated medical journals/studies not to prevent Covid infections nor prevent its transmission to others. For our children, serious illness and death are non-existent from Covid-19 unless your child is chronically unhealthy to begin with. Yet, the toxin in this injection will have serious, life-damaging, permanent effects on your child’s health immunity. The fact of natural T-Cell and DNA damage also came to light recently by medical scientist studies. I am calling on the medical community to put an immediate halt on children’s injections until the Canadian public can receive accurate, truthful data from these Covid injection injuries that have already occurred.
The Canadian public has a right to be able to make informed medical choices, especially for little children. To tell them repeatedly it is safe and effective and not give them that choice is a crime, and it’s also genocide.
The media and government must put an immediate halt to all scientific medical censorship and the silencing of health professionals who do not comply with your agenda, as well as hear from Covid injury victims. The Canadian public has a right to hear from those in our communities and families who have been injured by this procedure.
I am calling on my military and police comrades, all of you, all of us, who have sworn a personal oath to protect our family, our friends, and our communities, to now stand up and protect your loved ones against this government forced medical tyranny.
You chose to serve because you wanted to give back to your community, and instead, the government has turned your love for community and your loyalty against you, and you are now a weapon against the very people you love. Brothers and sisters, you can’t be forever for forever changing industry-government measures which use fear and violence and also be for your loved ones and for freedom. You have to choose; I am asking you to choose your family and your community. This is why you serve; this is your moment to be a hero for your loved ones. They deserve the truth; they deserve to be protected.
I am also calling on all Canadian to join in solidarity together. Freedom and love for our community. Freedom to choose, who you want to be, where you want to live, what you want to experience and learn what your spirituality is, and what you want to practice, who you want to love, What you want to put in your own bodies is the foundation of our democracy in Canada. We cannot let freedom die with this generation.
May God forever bless the free citizens of Canada.
Rumble — Are the vaccinated a threat to the unvaccinated?
This video is part of a larger exclusive interview at RAIR Foundation USA: https://rairfoundation.com/contagious-vaccinosis-are-the-vaccinated-a-threat-to-the-unvaccinated-video/
RAIR Foundation USA Interview with Dr. Roger Hodkinson
stock here: this guy died shortly after making these statements. He was immediately attacked, misquoted, lambasted. LOL Back in the day, some actually believed that the vaccines stopped infection. “
Last year, he claimed in a French documentary that Covid-19 vaccines led to the creation of coronavirus variants.
Experts contacted by The Associated Press explained that variants found across the globe began emerging long before vaccines were widely available.
They said the evidence suggests new variants evolved as a result of prolonged viral infections in the population and not vaccines, which are designed to prevent such infections.” And we now see that the supposed “debunk” instead perfectly makes the case that long term presence of high viral load in the vaccinated is what creates mutations. aka variants.
If we look at the curve from the WHO, since the vaccinations started in January, the curve showing new infections (contamination) has exploded, along with deaths.
Notably among young people.
—Yes. With thromboses, etc.
How do you view the mass vaccination program? Mass vaccination compared to treatments that work and aren’t expensive.
—It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.
—For the China virus, there are antibodies, created by the vaccine. What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution?
—The new variants are a production and result from the vaccination. You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.
—I’m following this closely and I am doing experiments at the Institute with patients who became sick with Corona after being vaccinated. I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine.
Should we be vaccinating during a pandemic?
—It’s unthinkable.
—They’re silent… many people know this, epidemiologists know it.
—It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger.
—It’s what we call Antibody Dependent Enhancement, which means antibodies favor a certain infection. The antibody attaches to the virus, from that moment it has the receptors, the antibodies, we have them in the macrophage etc.
—It pokes the virus and not accidentally, but because of the fact that they’re linked to the antibodies.
—It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination. OK?
stock here: I did a “map article” on Ukraine a few weeks back. The whole Russia to invade Ukraine narrative was #FaF out of the gate. This article provides more context. Some are complicit, some are evil.
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-washington-has-lost-its-mind-over-ukraine-200513?page=0%2C2
Putin’s stated vision for Russia and Ukraine is not absorption into a common state, but the sort of relationship that exists between the United States and Canada, in which people who share a common ancestry cooperate and profit from their relationship, while still having separate states. by David C. Hendrickson
What did we just witness? I refer to the two-month frenzy that seized the Western media, in which Vladimir Putin was massing 175,000 troops on Ukraine’s border for an invasion to begin right about now. The Washington Post led on December 3, 2021, with those big numbers and was duly followed by others. A gigantic massing of forces was taking place. Putin was threatening an invasion and had mobilized his forces to accomplish the final breakage of Ukraine. President Joe Biden was a believer, ordering evacuations from embassies in Ukraine and Belarus. He told Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy in late January that blood would almost certainly flow in the streets of Kiev, the national capital; “prepare for impact” sometime soon, probably in February.
And then a surprising thing happened. The Ukrainian president, the guy whose lead we were apparently following, said, in effect, cut it out. Not true. You’re panicking people in Ukraine, hurting its economy, and besides the Russian troop movements were really nothing out of the ordinary.
The Ukraine Narrative wobbled with that development. The people of Ukraine, who were soon to be flattened, were nonchalant while the distant superpower was on the edge of a nervous breakdown. Everyone involved among U.S. and Ukrainian officials then denied that the great rupture had happened, though of course, it did happen. It tells us something very revealing about the prospects for war.
Zelensky Acts Up
Biden made it clear in December that no U.S. forces were going to be deployed to Ukraine in the event of a Russian invasion, ruling out U.S. participation in a war but touting the threat of devastating economic sanctions as a deterrent. Biden also distinguished between a minor and a major Russian incursion, in what was widely held by the commentariat to be a gaffe. Zelensky complained about this, tweeting, “We want to remind the great powers that there are no minor incursions and small nations. Just as there are no minor casualties and little grief from the loss of loved ones. I say this as the President of a great power.” After telling Biden to chill on the invasion-mongering, he taunted the administration at a press conference: “Tell us openly we will never get into NATO.” Zelensky had heard loud and clear the Washington message, as recalibrated by Biden in December: Accept an offer from Moscow? Politically impossible, morally reprehensible. Prepare to fight them? Are you mad?
It is as if American Maximalism, the neocon policy canonized by Stephen Sestanovich, had finally met its match in the “no more war” sentiment among the American people. These two imperatives, pointing toward a posture of total hostility that is also emphatically short of war, doubtless float in the president’s brain as basic parameters of policy. But Biden’s stance—super-aggressive but also super-cautious—did not sit well with the Ukrainians.
This contretemps between the leader of the Free World and the president of the Ukrainian “great power” was very disturbing to the Washington establishment. They thought that Zelensky had flubbed his performance. He was apparently unaware of his proper role. “We’re his most important ally and he’s poking us in the eye and creating daylight between Washington and Kyiv,” said a senior administration official. “It’s self-sabotage more than anything else.”
Why War is Off the Table, for Now
The most striking implication of Zelensky’s comments is that the war scare was made in the United States. To understand why Zelensky doesn’t think a war is imminent, we must go back to April when the first great scare of a Russian invasion occurred. The preceding year, Azerbaijan had demonstrated in its conflict with Armenia that Turkish and Israeli drones could smash entrenched positions and rout the defenders. The Atlantic Council, the eyrie of Washington’s Ukraine hawks, immediately noted the relevance of this demonstrated new capability to the frozen conflict in the Donbas.
The new team at the White House, closely following a script announced by the Atlantic Council, declared that Crimea and the Donbas must be put back on the table. That meant, explained a Biden official, a “very extensive and almost constant focus on Ukraine from day one.” In the view of Democrats, Donald Trump had been a shameless appeaser of Putin; indeed, he was Putin’s puppet. This narrative, to be sure, was dubious in the extreme, as Trump the ostensible appeaser surrounded himself with advisors—H.R. McMaster, Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley, James Mattis, and John Bolton—who regularly blasted Russia in scalding tones. But though the narrative may have been wrong, it was theirs. The Democrats believed it. Where Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken largely followed Trump’s line on China, they broke sharply with him over Ukraine.
The Ukrainian government hailed the new administration and set forth a platform for the return of Donbas and Crimea. Then on April 3, 2021, Ukraine’s military announced on Facebook that military exercises would be conducted with five NATO powers in Ukraine’s eastern regions later in the year. “In particular,” it said, “defensive actions will be worked out, followed by an offensive in order to restore the state border and territorial integrity of a state that has been subjected to aggression by one of the hostile neighboring countries.”
Russia’s callup of reserves—which both now and in April was interpreted by U.S. intelligence as reflecting plans for a gigantic invasion—was in direct response to these three important developments: a startling new demonstration of the effectiveness of drone-led offensive operations, a new U.S. posture toward Ukraine-related issues that was far more aggressive than Trump’s, and the declaration by Ukraine’s military that they were working on a plan to drive the Russians out of the occupied territories. When Biden said in December that the United States would not commit forces to Ukraine in the event of a war, it took the legs out from under this plan.
The United States now vehemently denies that there was any idea of retaking the Donbas by force and that this is an invention of Russian propagandists. From the outside, it is impossible to know how far these plans advanced and how seriously they were taken, but to say that the Russians had no basis for thinking that something was afoot is clearly absurd. What is the explanation for the April 3 Facebook post by Ukraine’s military? Were they the unfortunate victims, like Joy Reid, of a malicious hack? If the Azerbaijani war had no military significance for the Donbas, why did the Atlantic Council argue that it did?
It is obvious that Ukraine’s military has sought an Azerbaijani-like capability in the past year, and little doubt that the United States has facilitated the acquisition of one. But it is equally obvious that no such plan can be put in motion if the U.S. attitude is what Biden and Blinken said it was in December. The Ukrainians were optimistic about getting such a pledge from the Americans during the previous year—that is, getting an American backstop if they sought to regain their lost territories by force, replaying the Georgia option of 2008 but this time with American guarantees. Their hopes are now deflated. Hence Zelensky’s taunt: just tell straight out that that we cannot join NATO, that is, that you intend to leave us in the lurch with regard to our lost territories.
The View from Russia
The air is thick with wild interpretations of Russian motives. As portrayed in the Western press, it is Putin and the Russians who are thirsting to change the status quo. He wants to conquer and absorb Ukraine. He wants to restore the Soviet Union. He wants to bring Russia to the geopolitical position the Soviet Union had in 1945. He wants to evict the United States from Europe. Since our Russia experts proceed on the assumption that you cannot believe a word he says, they are freed from all evidentiary restraint in their explication of what Putin wants. Since they rule out by hypothesis that he could conceivably have defensive motives, we are left with the choice of aims ranging from the aggressively obnoxious to the insanely aggressive.
The hawks are not ashamed to make stuff up. Putin, they say, is daily threatening war to take over Ukraine. No, that is what the United States and its media sycophants are saying that Putin is saying and doing. He says the military deployments are nothing. The Russian Foreign Ministry reminds people just about every day that it is not threatening any such war.
On Putin’s putative desire to conquer and absorb Ukraine, consider that Ukraine, a nation of 43.3 million people, would be impossible to rule effectively and profitably from Moscow, while the attempt to do so would emphatically impose huge financial and political costs. One of the pristine memories of Soviet history is that when Josef Stalin ordered his mercilessly cruel and wholly irrational campaign of dekulakization and collectivized agriculture, the Ukrainian peasantry burned half its grain and killed half its livestock rather than surrender it to the commissars.
U.S. intelligence has focused laser-like on the course and objectives of a Russian invasion, but what they have ignored, as they did in 2003 (Iraq) and 2011 (Libya), is what comes after Mission Accomplished. They are thinking about the forces required for an invasion like that which the United States undertook in Iraq, but the real numbers game, as we subsequently discovered in that now dimly remembered war, must take into account the forces required for an occupation. In sizing such forces, military historians identify ratios of one soldier for sixty people in unfriendly terrain, and a one to 100 ratio in friendlier environs. As Ukraine would be more like the former than the latter for Russia, that generates a force requirement of 721,000, way beyond existing Russian capabilities. Even the lesser number of 430,000 would require stripping the rest of the country of its defenses and imposing onerous new requirements for conscripts, a veritable mass mobilization. One does wonder if the U.S. officials predicting the imminent ingurgitation of this indigestible mass ever look beyond the first fifteen days of the plan they have implanted in the mind of the Russian military. On the surface, at least, U.S. “intelligence” appears not too bright, because it posits a complete disconnection between the ends foreseen and the means available. Putin, it is reasonable to assume, is not so blind.
The problem with conquering Ukraine is not primarily a function of the Ukrainian willingness to fight a guerilla war, but the impossibility of making any positive and profitable use of the territory after a big invasion. It is like asking the Russians whether they want to repeat the Holodomor. No, they don’t. The high-end numbers provided by “senior administration officials,” even if given a credence they do not deserve, are still totally inadequate if seen in relation to the political goals they say that Putin has in mind. Forgotten is that Putin’s central critique of both the Iraq invasion of 2003 and the Libyan invasion of 2011 is that the Americans proclaimed a victory and left anarchy. Why would he want to repeat those fiascos?
Ukraine is Not a Country
It is now said repeatedly by our talking heads that Putin denies that Ukraine is even a country. In their reconstruction, Putin thinks it is totally illegitimate and therefore ripe for takeover. “When you say things like, ‘Ukraine does not now and has never had a right to exist as a sovereign state, there is no such thing as the Ukrainian people,’ where does your rhetoric go from there?” asked a senior Western intelligence officer. The media cite Putin’s 5,000-word essay in July 2021 detailing the history of Russia’s relations with Ukraine. But Putin’s argument in that essay is totally different from what it has been represented to be by our media parrots, who in this case have definitely learned to speak but cannot read. In brief, Putin’s pitch was this:
Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus share a common history. For long stretches of time, their inhabitants considered themselves “a triune people comprising Velikorussians, Malorussians and Belorussians” rather than separate Slavic peoples. The Ukrainians, however, declared their independence and opted for separation rather than common nationhood. How do you treat such a people, Putin asked, and said there was only one answer: “with respect!” His essay explicitly acknowledged the right of the Ukrainians to form a separate and independent state. His language was that of a husband pleading with his wife not to leave him, while acknowledging that she has the right to do so and even some reason to do so. At least she shouldn’t hate him.
The nub of Putin’s argument concerned the terms of the divorce. He wrote that the Ukrainians, in deciding to leave, could not take out of the partnership more than they’d brought in the first place. The critical year was 1922, when the Ukrainian communists joined with the Russian communists and others to make the treaty that formed the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. At that time, Crimea was not part of Ukraine, though the Donbas was. Nor were the territories in the west that Stalin annexed in 1940 in the aftermath of the Nazi-Soviet Pact.
Putin’s discussion of the 1924 Soviet constitution and the right of secession it conferred is very revealing. He insists that this provision of the constitution was real and had to be respected, though it was also written at a time when the source of cohesion lay in central party control, so was effectively meaningless during the party’s reign. His conclusion, however, is clear: the Soviet Constitution, however defectively, did indeed provide a right of secession in 1924, reaffirmed in 1936, and on this basis, Ukraine had a right to secede. Far from making a claim for all Ukraine, he didn’t even make a claim to the Donbas. He pointed out that the Donbas and some surrounding areas were included in Ukraine at Lenin’s insistence, as part of the Bolshevik scheme for managing the minorities question, but acknowledged that Ukraine came into the union with those territories. There was, he wrote, still no alternative to the Minsk agreements, which explicitly recognize the Donbas as part of Ukraine.
Putin’s stated vision for Russia and Ukraine is not absorption into a common state, but the sort of relationship that exists between the United States and Canada, in which people who share a common ancestry cooperate and profit from their relationship, while still having separate states.
The reader will at this point object that I am making Putin seem very reasonable. Could it be? Don’t you know he’s a liar? That you can’t trust anything he says and therefore you can make him say anything you want? What is most objectionable about these objections is that they aren’t really about Putin at all, but about Russia and Russians. It is the Russian viewpoint, not Putin’s viewpoint as such, that is destitute of legitimacy in the eyes of America’s officialdom and commentariat.
The real guarantee of these views is not Putin’s bona fides but the nature and character of the people he rules. The biggest thing that our imaginative Russia experts miss is that Putin is constrained by Russian public opinion. By repeatedly chanting “autocracy,” they make it seem as if Putin is entirely disjoined from his nation, which is not so. The Russian nation sees the obvious point that the conquest of Ukraine would inevitably come at the expense of the Russian people. The hawks actually twist themselves into contradictions here, because they say that Putin is in fact deeply unpopular and yet he’s going to do the thing for which there is very little support in Russian opinion, and which would further rouse the Ukrainian nation against him. It’s like they expect him to commit hari-kari.
The Russian steps to increase readiness on Ukraine’s frontier give the impression that Russia will fight if the Ukrainians attempt to drive them from Crimea or the Donbas. Their determination, and that of the Russian public, is rock solid on the point of Crimea but much more ambivalent about the Donbas. It is unlikely that Putin would have difficulty rallying public support for a Russian intervention if the Ukrainians tried an Azerbaijani-type operation to reclaim the Donbas and that should certainly be taken as a red line by the United States. The critical point for Russia is not that it wants to annex these territories—on that point, public opinion is divided—but that it will not allow the Ukrainians to conduct a “cleansing” of Russophones from the area. The people of the Donbas want annexation by Russia, but the formula of the Minsk Accords—federal autonomy for the Donbas within Ukraine—is perfectly acceptable to Putin. The United States, by contrast, says that Minsk is the right formula but gives complete support to the Ukrainian refusal to do what is required of it under the accords. Blinken says that it is Russia who is not fulfilling Minsk. The record says otherwise. The Ukrainian government has rejected for some years the critical provision of the accords mandating autonomy for the Donbas.
The main argument against my thesis that Putin does not want or intend to invade Ukraine is that he might feel forced to intervene in part of it in response to the ongoing repression of the Russian interest by the Ukrainian government. Ukraine has done a lot of things in the last year—implementing a language law that is discriminatory against Russian-speaking Ukrainians, shutting down the TV networks, and seizing the assets and charging with treason Victor Medvedchuk, a long-time Putin friend and the voice of Russophones in the east—those certainly look like serious oppressions to Putin and the Russians. The Russians have a declared interest in the rights of the Russophone population of Ukraine. I admit that this constitutes a potentially compelling motive for them. That it could constitute such a motive is a telling commentary on the utter indifference that U.S. policy has displayed for thirty years toward the rights of Russian speakers in the protectorates it has embraced along Russia’s western border.
Granting, therefore, that the vigorous anti-Russian turn in Ukrainian policy is seen as a big problem by Putin, it remains very difficult to see how the use of force would solve it for him. There is talk about such a rescue operation by some Russophones, but not Russian officials or legislators. No way exists of getting a clear read on how the Russophone population outside Donbas would react to a Putin move to save them with a military invasion, but I don’t think it would be favorable even in the short term, for the simple reason that it could not be clean and would entail significant human and material losses. For the majority of Ukraine’s Russophones, I think that would look like a bad bargain and not something they would want. If they don’t want it, there would be minimal desire in Russia to give it to them.
Lessons Learned, Gains Consolidated
So, Biden was wrong and Zelensky was right. There will be no war. The one in the east, as a consequence of a Ukrainian reconquest of the Donbas or Crimea, has been put on extended hiatus. The one conjured up by U.S. intelligence is a fiction. That war is not imminent does not mean that it’s entirely foreclosed down the road, as the arms buildup and the war of venomous accusation is intrinsically dangerous. So, too, the probable motives of both Russia and the United States, which argue strongly against an imminent war, may change. The misperceptions which now rule the day in Washington, especially a view of the adversary which sees it as basically deranged, are not a good omen.
A lingering question remains. Did Washington’s alarmists really believe it themselves, or has consent been manufactured by a war scare whose utility they plainly saw, but the details of which they didn’t really believe? It’s a tough choice between the two, with alternative one telling us that they’ve been playing it straight and alternative two suggesting that we’ve all been the objects of a calculated plan by guys playing four-dimensional chess. The conclusion I reach, with some awkwardness, is that both alternatives, though seemingly contradictory, have been at play in Washington’s funhouse mirror, thick with distorted shapes and grotesque visages. What cannot be denied is that the war scare, with the media dutifully performing its stenographic role, has brought great advantages to the hawks. The LNG folks have made considerable progress in their campaign to prevent the opening of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The increased deployments to Eastern Europe and arms sales to Ukraine gratify the interests of the military-industrial complex. The anti-Russia coalition, which draws as much from sheer ideological enmity as anything resembling self-interest, has advanced its campaign to gain legal authority from Congress to impose a total shutdown in relations with Russia. That looks to me like three wins for the hawks.
The cleverest feature of the administration’s approach is that, when there is no war, Biden and Blinken can claim that it was all due to them and their solid statesmanship. Deterrence has been successful! Our firm leadership made it so! We’re not quite at that part in the unraveling of the plot, but getting closer, as U.S. intelligence seems not to be getting its predicted 175,000 troops. At the last congressional briefing on February 5, the latest intelligence estimate was that 130,000 troops were mobilized, with only 62,000 combat forces deployed, scattered all around Ukraine’s periphery. Count on it, the reduction in future numbers (as the Russian exercises wind down) will be attributed to the wise leadership of the Biden administration.
David C. Hendrickson is President of the John Quincy Adams Society and the author of Republic in Peril: American Empire and the Liberal Tradition (2018).
Image: Flickr.
WATCH: Boston Mayor Michelle Wu's Livestream didn't work out how she hoped! 😂😂😂😂pic.twitter.com/HsJ6Qdr8Bo
— Election Wizard 🚛 (@ElectionWiz) February 11, 2022
Stop what you’re doing and watch this.
— Courtney Holland 🇺🇸 (@hollandcourtney) February 11, 2022
Kids at a Las Vegas elementary school burst out into cheers after learning they no longer have to wear a mask to school pic.twitter.com/xIuHgFtmHo
stock here: The FLCCC is a good start, but it looks too complicated for most people to even get started on. So for half a year I have been thinking to write this up. Here we are, one of my workers out sick for going on 5 days, so I wrote it up. I am having a physician review and then will post it up in a nicer looking a fashion.
Early Treatment Protocol
Strategy: Fortify the Immune System and “Calm The Storm” aka reduce inflammation
If pregnant, definitely consult your doctor or physicians assistant (PA) before proceeding.
Be cautious of taking any anti-biotic if you have JUST a viral infection. The anti-biotics ALSO wipe out all the good bacteria in your gut. 70% of the immune system is created in the gut, if you wipe this out, your ability to fight the virus is lessened.
Don’t be intimidated by the length of this document, the real meat is the section immediately below, start this immediately. The rest is “Bonus Material”.
Vitamin Bolstering
Vitamin D3: Take 10,000 units per day. On a bright summer day, your body makes 20,000 “units” of vitamin D3 in a day. And you never get sick in summer. Space it out and take it with your Vit C
Vitamin C: 1000mg twice a day, even better is to do 500mg 4 times a day. Realistically, the more the better. Take as much as you can without getting upset stomach due to the acid. Best to take after food, we recommend a high pro-biotic diet, yogurt is a great start. Note below, the NAC is best taken before food.
Vitamin B Complex: Some recommend just B12, but I believe it is beneficial to get all the B Vitamins, my Brand is Super Vitamin B-Complex
Zinc: 100 mg per day. The common dissolving tablets are great because they coat the mouth and throat, often the place where viruses first install, however, the brand I have is only 12mg, I had to go to their website to find that information. You can do the dissolving tablets AND also take vitamin pills.
Quercetin Bromelain: 1600 mg Quercetin per day, 330 mg Bromelain per day. This is over the counter and fairly easy to find.
NAC: 1200 mg per day, take before/without food.
Aspirin: 325mg per day, unless contraindicated by your doctor. It works as anti-inflammatory and as a blood thinner. It helps prevent blood clots which are a prime effects of the Spike S protein that is part of COVID and also a part of taking the COVID Shot. See section on Medical Monitoring, your blood pressure and pulse rate are likely to both be elevated, aspirin will help regulate them downward.
Melatonin 2 to 10 mg before bed. Melatonin is a natural hormone created in your brain when darkness comes. It help you go to sleep and to stay asleep in a deeper sleep. During early treatment, sleep as much as you can. NOTE: There are wide personal differences in how Melatonin affects people, and the rate at which it is used up in the body. 10 may be way too much for some people and you might be groggy the whole next day.
Anti-Septic Anti-Viral
Mouthwash 3 times per day. Any mouthwash is better than no mouthwash, but ideally your mouthwash should contain chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, or certylpyridinium chloride.
Thieves Oil: A Blend of Essential Oils with known anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal effects. Buy online or make your own, the recipe is easy to find. Using small spray bottle, spray directly into mouth, trying to get to the back of the throat where virus often “install” first. Use several times a day, the taste is good too.
Iodine nasal spray/drops: Use 1% povidone-iodine commercial product as per instructions 2–3 x daily. If 1%-product not available, must first dilute the more widely available 10%-solution6 and apply 4–5 drops to each nostril every 4 hours. (No more than 5 days in pregnancy.)
Anti-Inflammatory and Oxygen Support
See notes in Medical Monitoring, Pulse-Oximeter
There are 2 types of Asthma Inhalers. One if fast acting, and is not a steroid, the other is taken daily, is a steroid, and provide anti-inflammatory action, but does not relieve acute conditions. Have some of both on hand, they are probably fine long after their expiration date.
Albuterol is the fast acting inhaler. The small sacks in your lungs get dilated (enlarged) and you get better oxygen transfer. They say 2 inhalations every 4 to 6 hours. But if your O2 levels are going down, I would consult a medical professional and see if you can do more.
The other usually slower acting type of inhaler is usually prescribed for a daily application, and will be one of several steroids (Budesonide is common). Steroids are anti-inflamatory. Being inflamed makes every body function not work as well. When the lungs get inflamed, it is more likely to get the secondary bacterial infection of the lungs, and that could be pneumonia on top of your first case of viral infection.
Loss of Taste or Smell: One patient had no taste or smell for a week, but within 3 days of using the Nasal Steroid nasal spray, recovered 70% of taste and smell. These are normally for allergies, and they are steroids so that is great as they are anti-inflammatory, they “calm the storm”. Fluticasone propionate is the Ingredient. The trade name will often have Fluti in the name such as FlutiCare
Dietary Recommendations
Do NOT discount the power of Chicken Noodle Soup! Have some in stock at all times. If you can make some fresh, with fresh organic vegetables, even better.
Honey. Real Honey will last in storage for 25 years. Honey is magic and swallowing a tablespoon a couple times a day, trying to swoosh it around a bit will help general health and anti-viral anti-bacterial.
Garlic. If you are lucky enough to find the long term marinated garlic cloves, in the Asian section, you can eat 3 or 4 like candy. Twice a day.
Ginger. You can make Ginger and Honey tea, or you can find marinated Ginger slices, known to Sushi chefs as Gari, in the Asian section, if you are lucky.
Pro-biotic diet and/or supplements: You will have a strong immune system if you eat a broad pro-biotic diet. Non-pasteurized yogurt is a great start. I also like Kimchee and Natto. Natto is fermented soybeans and has a specialized bacteria that you are not likely to get from other sources. Watch out if buying a pro-biotic pill form, some have very limited types of bacteria, there are roughly 17 important bacteria so you want a “broad spectrum”
Prescription Medicines
HCQ and Ivermectin. Do your own research. It is best to have these on hand before you have any symptoms, they may take quite some time to obtain, and early treatment is by far the best. There are online doctors that do telemedicine and they are keen on prescribing these.
Be aware that some Pharmacies will not fill an order if it is listed as prevention (Prophylactic) or treatment of COVID. There are also online Pharmacies that will fill prescriptions and some will even write the prescription for you also.
Dosing of Ivermectin is something you are going to have to deal with. The chart below is for 0.2 mg per kg of body weight. I am not familiar with HCQ.
For Ivermectin, other dosages I have seen are 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg of body weight. They usually come at 3 mg per pill but other dosages are out there. Animal forms are also available, and people have screwed themselves up by taking a dose for an 1800 pound horse. I could only see using this in an emergency in which you cannot get Ivermectin. But back to point number one….get it ahead of time and have it sitting in your medicine supplies, along with the anti-biotics that you have stocked up on. Capite?
Vital Signs Monitoring
These are simple and cheap methods of monitoring your “Vital Signs”. And it is very effective too. Quite simply, if you are getting steadily better, keep going on the program, if you are getting worse you will have to make a call of when to go to a Doctor or Emergency Room. The last page is a chart where you should take your Vital Signs and write them down every 3 to 4 hours. In the event that you have to seek medical help, take your “chart” with you, it will help them understand your condition.
You should obtain all of these now, and I like the idea of having 2 because if one breaks you have a backup, and if you get a weird reading, you can try the other device.
Pulse Oximeter: $20 to $40 some are fancier and show a PI% (strength of the pulse). It shows oxygenation of the blood and pulse rate. 97 to 100% is a good numbers, improving is a good direction. Some places say if it drops to 94% you go to the emergency room. I would say that at 88% no matter how well you are doing otherwise, you present yourself as a problem for the emergency room.
Temperature: Simple and no-brainer. You should have a baseline, some people run colder or hotter than 98.2. If your base temperature is 97.2, then a temperature of 100.2 would be a real concern, but if your average was 98.7 then 100.2 would just be something that you log and monitor.
Blood pressure. Once again, good to have a baseline. When I had COVID my blood pressure was 160/100 and pulse rate in the 90s, with the protocol that went down to 140/90 the next morning and then 130/85 then next morning. I took readings every 3 or 4 hours. Some people might decide to go to emergency room at 160, my number would be 180/120 if either one was exceeded.
stock here: I ordered the 4 free at home COVID test kits. They will likely sit on the shelf until some time as I can muster the time and a chemistry review of said kits. Maybe for now, I will at least put them under the microscope and see if any nano-particle are obvious.
n January 2019, the WHO defined the growing number of vaccination critics as one of the top ten threats to global health, and since the unprecedented Corona vaccination fiasco, the number of vaccination refusers has truly multiplied.
Meanwhile, resistance is forming even within the orthodox medical establishment. But the masterminds of the WHO continue to insist on an unrealistic vaccination coverage rate of at least 70 percent.
In this article, Jan Walter describes, with extensive source citations, which techniques are possible to still vaccinate the population, when people are becoming increasingly critical of vaccinations. This is only fueled by the continuing pressure for mass “vaccination” against a non-lethal disease for 99.8% of people, with a new type of “vaccine” that is actually gene therapy by means of mRNA. It seems like science fiction and is chilling, but the metohodes and techniques are available. There question is how far do we let it get?
Vaccinations increasingly scrutinized and the chilling alternative
In January 2019, WHO [1] defined the growing number of vaccine critics as one of the ten greatest threats to global health, and since the unprecedented corona vaccination fiasco [2], the number of vaccine refusers has really multiplied. Meanwhile, resistance is emerging even within the conventional medical community. But the masterminds at WHO continue to insist on an unrealistic vaccination rate of at least 70 percent.
Now several experts and former mainstream journalists like John O’Sullivan are warning that the massive PCR testing campaign could be a WHO vaccination program in disguise. (see Principia Scientific) [3] O’Sullivan is referring to a new technology developed at Johns Hopkins University that is supposed to make it possible to carry out covert vaccinations through a PCR test. (See Johns Hopkins Universitiy) [4]
stock here: initially when I started my first blog, it was kind of a scrap book where I could place all the important stuff I found. I lurked on sites for half a decade before posting even my first comment. It sure has snowballed from there.
And here is a post I did not want to lose.
Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors hear an earful from the public The public is outraged with the unjustifiable, draconian COVID policies put in place by Public Health Director Dr. Sara Cody. I propose 9 questions that the Supervisors should have asked but didn’t.  Steve Kirsch Feb 10    Summary Here’s the video of yesterday’s Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors meeting (Feb 8, 2022) regarding COVID-19 (3:36 through at 5:29):  The meeting featured public health officer Dr. Sara Cody. Public testimony came from the Santa Clara firefighters and others in the community who are all outraged about the draconian measures instituted in Santa Clara County by Dr. Cody. The short story is that Dr. Cody doesn’t cite a single piece of evidence justifying why Santa Clara County has to have more restrictive measures than the State. She assures everyone she is studying whether we can align with California’s guidelines but has no timeline for providing an answer. At no time does she identify a single intervention she has instituted that she credits for the amazing mortality numbers she shows in her mortality chart (@3:45:13 and shown below) which is not normalized and thus misleading. But it fools the Supervisors (especially Supervisor Simitian) who think she’s awesome. It’s not clear that anything will change since the Supervisors only went as far as suggesting that she should look into aligning the County policies with the State policies to eliminate confusion. This story is of special interest for those in Santa Clara County, but for those living in other areas, it helps to illustrate some of the techniques that your public health officials will use to keep you in a state of emergency. It ends by highlighting key questions your local government officials should be asking and probably aren’t. Why this video is important This video is important because: Santa Clara County has some of the most draconian COVID restrictions in the CountyPrior to the meeting all the Supervisors were blindly supporting whatever Sara Cody said, regardless of what the science saysBy the end of the nearly 2 hour segment (Feb 8 2022 meeting: Agenda item #8 starting at 3:36 and ending at 5:29:45), it was clear that some of the Supervisors had realized that the public is very upset, but they are still not asking the right questions to get the policy change that is needed. In short, having members of the public speak up at City Council and Board of Supervisors meetings helps, but to actually create change, at least one of the Supervisors needs to step up to the plate and have a 1:1 meeting with Dr. Cody and ask some of the hard questions that I outline at the end. The public speaks for 45 minutes Here is the video of the meeting, starting at 3:53 when the Supervisors stop talking and we hear from members of the public. Note that there was also a public comment section at the start of the meeting at 27:15 until 1:08:45. The first public speaker (Collin Connors) was brilliant. He talked about the John Hopkins study showing the public interventions have virtually no effect on the pandemic, but had a huge negative effect on the public well being. From the study: “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.” In short, this study, which was extremely well done, makes it crystal clear that Sara Cody caused enormous amounts of harm for no benefit. I know a highly qualified Stanford Professor that would love to debate Dr. Cody on this, but I guarantee that Dr. Cody will never accept such a debate. None of the Supervisors mentioned this in their remarks. That’s stunning. This is one of the most important points made at the entire meeting. The second public speaker (3:54:30) is firefighter Barry Arata who points out that the rates of COVID are virtually identical for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated firemen and police. He also points out that there isn’t a single documented case of anyone getting COVID from a first responder. He’s out of work now because of Dr. Cody’s mandate. There is no public benefit for this. Zero. The point he makes is pretty simple: if Dr. Cody is worried about infecting the public, she should just order if you are symptomatic, you stay home, regardless of vaccination status. Period. This is because, as Dr. Fauci has pointed out, the main driver of spread is symptomatic people. See my article on asymptomatic spread for details. The fourth speaker (Alex Bruni @ 3:58:52) points out that subjecting the unvaccinated to mandatory testing has led to skewed data. Multiple medical journals show equal chances of infection and he refers to the FOIA request that Barry Arata did showing this was true in Santa Clara County that vaccination made no difference in infection rates. SJPD had 229 positives, but only 28 were in those who were unvaccinated. The fire department had 160 positives. Only 13 were unvaccinated. The vaccinated only get tested if symptomatic, but the unvaccinated get tested twice a week regardless of symptoms. If the testing regimen was the same, we’d be seeing higher numbers among the vaccinated. Dan Kearnan @ 4:01:03 asks the Supervisors to trust the people to do the right thing and stop the mandate. Mike Rogers @ 4:03:12 points out the asymmetric testing skews the data collected which is why the data and conclusions in Santa Clara doesn’t match up with other areas. Says there are no exemptions for people who have been previously infected; this makes absolutely no sense. Dr. Henry Arnold @ 4:05:17 says making vaccines available is OK, but mandating them in Santa Clara County is not. Case counts have dropped 75% in the last 3 weeks. Why are you continuing to trample people’s lives? At 4:06:30, the President realizes there are too many speakers so just the first 15 speakers will get 2 minutes and the rest will only get 1 minute to speak. …. Lydia (4:29:28) is a nurse who came out of medical leave to risk her life during the pandemic. She points out that because she’s had numerous religious exemptions granted in the past, her exemption for the COVID vaccine was not honored. That is ridiculous. Fired Nurse (4:30:38) says most of the people she took care of for COVID were vaccinated. She risked her life at the start of the pandemic to save lives. Now the County is paying her back for that service by firing her because she wouldn’t take the vaccine. Countyguy (4:32:36) commends Sara Cody for ruining thousands of lives. Worth a listen as he is saying things that I’m sure most people are thinking, but are too polite to verbalize. The Board of Supervisors weighs in with their views At 4:38:24, the Board President asks Dr. Cody where she stands on masking given the state is revising their policy. Dr. Cody says they are looking at the data and have no decision to share at this point. This of course is ridiculous since the masks don’t do a damn thing to reduce spread of the virus (according to science), so she’s ostensibly admitting she’s incompetent to interpret any data. The Board President is equally clueless so he doesn’t question her on this. He asks her for a statement that he can disseminate explaining why Santa Clara County will not comply with the State’s order. Supervisor Cindy Chavez @4:43:06 says that she believes Dr. Cody is making decisions rooted in her (Cody’s) best thinking. She apologizes to Dr. Cody that the public doesn’t support her (which proves she was actually listening to the public comments). She asks Dr. Cody why the County isn’t following the State guidelines (masking), as well as the orders affecting the first responders. @4:45:12 Dr. Cody sidesteps the question and talks about booster shots in order to reduce infection and hospitalization among healthcare workers which would lead to a staffing shortage (which of course is exacerbated by her order to fire those workers who are unvaccinated). Those were the principles behind the booster order, but she cites NO EVIDENCE that the boosters work against Omicron. She claims her order was built around the State’s order, but she’s confusing the issues because the state didn’t demand that firefighters and police who were unvaccinated must be fired; that is a County of Santa Clara feature. @4:47:39 Chavez says the County should align with the State and it is really confusing and unjustified to deviate. @4:48:40 Cody says that “we do not take these [deviations] lightly” (then laughs… I’m serious!) “They are very difficult for all of us. So they are only implemented when there really is a need IN MY JUDGMENT.” So she’s looking at the trends and layers of protection and what things look like and doesn’t have a set timeline for the booster mandate. @4:51:25 We learn that waivers weren’t granted if the waiver request form was incomplete. Could it be re-submitted? Not answered. @4:51:30 Chavez re-iterates her desire to align our policies with the State. @4:57:53 Chavez voices her very valid concern about forced overtime. I was impressed she knew that. I brought up forced overtime in Santa Clara County in an earlier substack article. She ends by reiterating her desire to see alignment with the State guidelines. @4:59:50 Vice-President Ellenberg leads off by asking about the infection rate in the jail. Then she asks about outbreaks elsewhere. Wow. Did she even listen to the 45 minutes of public comments? I sure couldn’t tell from any of her questions. @5:04:18 Supervisor Lee focuses on testing. He said the virus used to just affect a friend of a friend and now it is infecting his direct family members. But he doesn’t make the connection that this means the vaccines do not work. Then he talks about quarantine requirements. Then asks about omicron variants. Lastly, he wants to create a “Thank you video” for vaccination workers. There is no evidence he listened to any of the public comments.’ @5:11:26 Supervisor Simitian leads off with a question about pandemic vs. endemic, when is there “yet another round of vaccinations being necessary.” Cody says the future is uncertain. Nobody agrees on the definition of endemic. Simitian says it’s important we think about what’s next. @5:18:45 Simitian is impressed by the death toll in the county which according to the chart presented @3:45:13 is very low. This is deaths per 100,000 population on the y-axis.  But Joe, Santa Clara County isn’t significantly different from the Bay Area as a whole, so this doesn’t point to Sara Cody being a genius which you imply in your remarks. Dr. Cody’s graph is simply statistical fraud Joe. It’s not adjusted by age, obesity, and other demographics. When you do that, Santa Clara County comes out about average. That’s why nobody is following what Sara Cody says. Sara Cody’s policies have extracted a huge unnecessary toll on this community. That first commenter who you ignored pointed this out. That Johns Hopkins study was extremely well done. It basically shows Sara did the wrong thing and caused untold harm. There is no intervention that Sara Cody has done that is unique in Santa Clara County that could be replicated elsewhere and make a “50 to 60% difference” that you ascribe to Sara Cody. If we had the “magic secret sauce policy” that reduced death rates by 2X, everyone would be copying it. As far as I can tell, it’s much more likely that having a young population, having top hospitals, and a generally very wealthy and healthy population has more to do with it than any of Sara’s interventions. But if I’m wrong, please let me know. Specifically, can anyone name the Sara Cody intervention(s) that were different from the State guidelines that produced a 2X drop in mortality per 100,000 population? I didn’t think so. Look at the deaths per 100,000 population numbers from Johns Hopkins for the top 20 countries most affected by COVID:  According to this chart, all of these countries should do “the Cody plan” because Santa Clara County is handily beating everyone. But nobody is following Cody’s advice. Not anywhere. There is a reason for that. Sara’s chart is a mirage, it is not even adjusted for age! Take a look at this chart:  You want to have a low death rate from COVID? All you have to do is have a young population. Having sky high housing prices means the elderly can’t afford to live here. Get it? So Sara’s numbers look awesome! Furthermore, Let’s look at the State statistics from a neutral source like Statistica which shows that California is at 205 which is more than double that of Hawaii. So we shouldn’t do what Cody says. We should follow what Hawaii is doing if you want to just use the numbers. Per Cody’s chart, California is at 40 deaths per 100,000 whereas this chart below shows California at 205. Why are they off by a factor of 5?? (205/40)  And one shouldn’t just focus on COVID (which is what you are doing) since the vaccine is not without risk: it kills and disables people and none of that is even discussed. The impact of all of these interventions is NOT JUST the COVID mortality rate. Even if the vaccine was perfectly safe, the Hopkins study showed the damage Sara did… for nothing. @5:20:30 Simitian asks about the Cody restrictions and waivers and acknowledges the pain expressed by the public speakers. This is answered at 5:22:04 where Jeff Smith says he looks at it and will give waivers if/when needed, but the problem is that if people don’t have a waiver, they take a job elsewhere. The entire vaccine mandate should be questioned in light of the FOIA stats from the first responders showing the vaccines make no difference in cases. But they don’t ask that question. @5:26:30 Mike Wasserman asks if unrelated people can eat in a restaurant without masks, why isn’t it safe for a first responder who is unvaccinated and wearing a mask? And he knows lots of people who got Omicron and never reported it. Finally, we have 93% being vaccinated, why aren’t we at herd immunity since we were told once we got to 80% it would be over. My take Clearly Wasserman and Chavez are listening to the people and are trying to help, Simitian is kind of listening but not asking any tough questions because he was snowed by the bogus mortality stats, and Supervisor Lee and Vice-President Ellenberg clearly don’t seem to care about the first responders at all. The questions that the Supervisors should have asked It was frustrating watching this that none of the Supervisors asked questions like: Isn’t that mortality chart misleading because it is not adjusted for the demographics of the population? What do the adjusted numbers look like? (Answer: Yes, it is misleading. An adjusted chart would show that we aren’t doing any better than anyone else. That’s why we don’t show it.)If you claim Santa Clara County is doing so well then how come 1) the rest of the world isn’t following our policies, and 2) you can’t name a single policy or set of policies that you can prove are responsible for the difference. (Answer: our policies don’t work, that’s why nobody is following them. We can’t name a differentiator policy that works because there isn’t one)If the vaccines are really working, how come it isn’t making any difference at all in the infection rates of first responders? (Answer: It’s not making a difference because the vaccines don’t work. Duh.)Why are we deviating from the state in mandating a vaccine that doesn’t make a difference at all as measured in our county? (Answer: Because we want to give the impression we are better than other Counties so you’ll keep listening to whatever we say, no matter how ridiculous it is.)Is there a single documented case of a first responder in the County spreading COVID to someone? (Answer: Of course not. We don’t need data to justify our policies. That’s not how it works. We do things that people “think” will work.)What would happen to our numbers if we just told people who have symptoms to stay home instead of firing them? (Answer: The numbers wouldn’t change of course since only people with symptoms spread the virus. Everyone knows that, even Dr. Fauci)How many people last month contracted COVID from a first responder and subsequently were hospitalized or died? (Answer: Zero)Why are we solving a problem that doesn’t exist (preventing people who are treated by first responders from getting COVID) and tossing people under the bus who risk their lives for the community on a daily basis? Is that the right thing to do? (Answer: Because it makes us look like we are protecting the public. It’s the same reason we have mask mandates. The masks do nothing, but the public thinks they work and we are protecting them. So they keep following our orders).The Hopkins study shows Dr. Cody’s policies have caused untold harm in the community (e.g., “my child hasn’t been able to attend school for 18 months”) and yet nobody is holding her accountable for the harm she has caused? (Answer: Yes, it was all for nothing, but we can attack the Hopkins paper by claiming it isn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal and doing ad hominem attacks on the authors. That will create enough doubt in the study to make it a non-issue even though the study was highly acclaimed by experts.)I remember the last major fire we had here and I recall it took months to get it under control. That doesn’t sound to me like we should be laying off firefighters. Am I missing something? We just heard the County Executive Jeff Smith say he’s looking at this weekly. That’s very troubling. When the next big one hits, how he is going to supply the manpower? Summary It’s too bad nobody is going to ask Sara Cody the nine questions above. But maybe one of the Supervisors might surprise me. In the meantime, I don’t think anything will change. Like Comment Share You’re a free subscriber to Steve Kirsch’s newsletter. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. Subscribe © 2022 Steve Kirsch Unsubscribe548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104  |
I picked up a full 1931 Encyclopedia. It shall be interesting to see how that ties Hitler into Rittenhouse, as the speculation shows. Hitler gained fame by participating in a failed coup, in which he was injured and then then in a 24 day trial, that gave him great audience, was convicted of treason, and sentenced to 5 years. He only served 9 months. More at link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Hall_Putsch
From Radio Far Side
https://augenguy.blogspot.com/2021/
Being the kind of person who likes to let my mind rift on certain events and themes, I started thinking about why the media went out of their way to disguise the fact that all the main characters in the Rittenhouse drama were white with German last names. I ended up running smack into Nazis, Catholics and yes, Q itself.
The surname “Rittenhouse” (Reittighaus) comes from Austrian nobility and means “of the marsh house”. Grosskreutz is another Germanic surname meaning “Great Cross”. Rosenbaum is yet another Germanic surname, meaning “Rosebush”. Finally, Huber comes from a Germanic term meaning “landowner,” and implies a wealthy individual with “huben” being an appreciable amount of land.
The casual observer might be forgiven for thinking the four central characters in the Kyle Rittenhouse drama represent roll call at the Beer Hall Putsch. In fact, the verdict was handed down on 19 November 2021, almost 98 years to the day of the anniversary of the Nazi’s attempted coup d’etat on 9 November 1923. For the time being, I will dodge the numerology of the number 9.
On a symbolic level, Austrian nobility saved America’s heartland from a Socialist coup fomented by Catholic secret societies.
Categories
Never Ever Brag About Your Jabs!
stock here. I am in an Astronomic Foundation, some really smart and really well studied people. However most of them would Poo-poo on Astrology, although the know the symbols and constellations, most would be “too scientific” to put much credence in anything related to Astrology. And they would be wrong. I think that Astrology can help us in our current bio-life, as well as connect us and give us insights into our past. Dancing on the rim of the great reset, these insights could give guidance, or a can of whoop ass, who knows.
Let me know what you think after this 5 minute video.
stock here, below is a great website on blogspot, and somehow they have not been banned. I guess they weren’t as “lucky” as me to discover the hot lots in late July 2021 and be nearly instantly scrubbed from the internet. The below is the concluding paragraphs.
https://augenguy.blogspot.com/
Slowly it seems the masses are awakening, from this delusion. It appears that folks are realizing just how clueless and self-absorbed we have all been for the last 100 years, but we have a long way to go.
We must resolve to punish those who brought this on us, while confessing that it would not have been possible without our consent and sloth. We must resolve to educate ourselves and take full responsibility for the quality and nature of our lives.
Finally, we must, as a species, come to realize that dogma, decrees and demands are not science. We must castigate en masse anyone who uses the terms “settle science” or “consensus science” Science is the systematic questioning of the status quo, not the capitulation to it.
Our birthright is the state of individual and sovereign moral agent, and our collective duty is to jealously defend that birthright, for all living souls, from any infringement by any entity. This self-imposed crisis must be the final battle for our true and lasting freedom.
If we erect monuments to this period in history, then let them be reminders to the future that we finally ended slavery in all its evil and pernicious forms in our lifetimes.
Now is the time for heroes and legends.
stock here, there was another source with a hit job on Melatonin, I’ll add it if I can find it again.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788539?resultClick=1
We know these sociopaths are willing to murder 60000 seniors, in a snuff
job, in nursing homes…..but what else would they not do?
They recommended NOT to take baby aspirin for blood pressure control, early
last year I think….insane!
Now they are saying that Melatonin
“Taking sleep aids has been linked in prospective studies with the
development of dementia and early mortality,” she said.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/01/health/melatonin-overuse-wellness/index.html
Asshats…..sure some of the hypnotics were really bad, 400% increase in
cancer and such…..they are lumping melatonin into this group.
Then the asshats pretend that the time to fall asleep is the only thing
important, and not the quality or duration of sleep.
“When adults took melatonin, it decreased the amount of time it took them
to fall asleep by four to eight minutes,” Dr. Cora Collette Breuner, a
professor in the department of pediatrics at Seattle Children’s Hospital at
the University of Washington, told CNN last March.
That’s all I got to say about that……they do not want the vast population to
get good sleep.
I been using melatonin around 3mg and it does help me sleep. At 5 I feel
groggy, but if I get up and start moving it really doesn’t matter…after 2
cappuchinos!
This blogger was sacked about the time Nukepro was decimated.
I added the Trump into the issue. See farther below an article I wished to promote.
But I wanted to add the Trump effect in, because it will be used against us.
I hate to see Trump being drawn back into the conversation. His ego will allow them to draw him back in. The haters need to hate and they will.
We do not want him for President again, he fucked up big time the first go around. He needed to de-sissyfy the Military, and he needed to cleanup the corrupt local prosecutors, DA’s, judges, mayors (and stop the receiving of bad actor financers).
He did not reign in the Ashkenazi owned media, he just sparred with them. He did not break up big monopolies. He let Mueller and gang drag things out for his whole term. He got things done by executive order, and they knew they were going to steal the election (that is part of the abuse and they want us to know it too), so they knew they could reverse all the executive orders.
So we need to all wise up and to know that we need someone, but we definitely don’t need Trump. Every Patriot knew that Trump had huge support, and we also knew that they would cheat as much as they could, but neither we, NOR Trump put a stop to the failed and obviously broken election systems. The effing absuridty of tallying votes by putting them on a USB stick, it’s theater. Have stacks of paper, tallied up in a chain of command, and then add them to other stacks, and then other stacks. Use a rolled paper adding machine for further back check. It is so simple, that it begs the question….everyone wants it that way, like the FDA/CDC screwed up and un trustworthy VAERS system.
————————————– But I was just going to post this site, they have a few links within the text that take you to more detailed explanations.
| The media – both news and entertainment – have now politicized nearly everything in our society as an extremely powerful mechanism of control. Politicization is so effective at manipulating the populace because most people emotionally connect their personal belief system to the belief system of their political party, and so then any attack on their party – legitimate or otherwise – is interpreted by their brain as an attack on themselves. Reason and logic then jump out the nearest window as raw emotion takes the helm, thus making them even more susceptible to the predatory controlling influences. This is an extremely damaging and misfortunate exploit of human nature. Worse, this exploit is as easy to execute as flipping a light switch for the majority of the population – and it is currently being employed to its maximum effect.  The largest PSYOP in history is unfolding right before our eyes, armed with incalculable amounts of human behavior data harvested from internet and smart phone usage geared toward manipulating us to walk in lock-step into the incinerator of our own destruction. We’re dealing with a captured media and the transparently obvious military grade psychological operations they are relentlessly employing, the millions of sheep that believe their every obvious lie and preach it as gospel, and their near total obliviousness to the self-evident fact that this plandemic is a blatant takeover of the world. Here are two essential articles detailing how politicians hack our brains with fear as a means of political control: This Is Your Brain On Terrorism Bio-Security and Politics  |