stock here: just saying….COVID is done, they attempt to pivot to some truth, so they can point back, and say….see we reacted to the science…..damn them to hell.

Subscribe now Advocacy Journalism is Propaganda Solutions Journalism is Propaganda   Robert W Malone MD, MS Mar 5   Over the last two years, I have come to realize that “journalism” and “journalists” seem to have changed in some fundamental way. I used to believe that there were standards and bedrock ethics which all journalists working for major publications ascribed to. I guess I had thought that the stereotype of the intrepid journalist toiling away in a brave and unending quest for truth was the norm (think “All the President’s Men”). But no longer. Now I feel so naive for ever believing that. What I have personally experienced, again and again, is something very different. Allow me three general examples to illustrate the point- First example. Many years ago, when I was working for the “Aeras Global Tuberculosis Vaccine Foundation” (one of the early Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation non-profit vaccine companies), the CEO hired a media consulting firm which mainly consisted of a Pulitzer-prize winning journalist and a marketing manager. To insure that favorable stories about the organization and its mission were printed, the “journalist” and the marketing specialist would consult with their clients (in this case “Aeras”), and learn what story the organization wanted to be told in a major print publication. An article pushing the story would then be crafted, all of the necessary background assembled to meet whatever editorial review standards were likely to be encountered, and this pre-baked work product would be fed to some “journalist” working for the targeted publication. Free work product, no labor required, what’s not to like? My first “you are not in Kansas any more” moment concerning modern journalism was when I saw this process used to “place” an article into “The Economist”, which I had naively believed operated as an independent arbiter of truth. Silly me. The second example comes from having repeatedly been on the receiving end of “gotcha” journalism as it is currently practiced. “Journalists”, particularly many of the younger ones, seem to use a variety of ploys to draw out information that they can weaponize in some manner to support a pre-determined storyline that they wish to promote. Often it is a sort of confidence game, like a con artist might employ, where they flatter or use phrases like “I just want to help you to get your story out” to get the subject to let down their guard and agree to an interview. After establishing a relationship with the subject, they then draw out details using increasingly aggressive questions focused on supporting the true agenda. Often these personal details are woven into a story line designed to delegitimize someone or otherwise reveal some salacious character flaw. Then the article drops, and the naive subject suddenly finds that they have been duped into revealing personal details that have been weaponized to support a pre-determined narrative. Having experienced this myself a few times, I now often see this strategy (and various versions of this con) repeatedly play out with colleagues. As for me, lesson learned is to vet the “journalist” by reading prior work, and just say no when it becomes clear that they are a specialist in this type of strategy. The third example comes from listening to disenchanted “old school” journalists (print and broadcast). These voices seem to be a mixture of mid-career and older practitioners, from “print” (an increasingly outdated term these days) and broadcast media. Again and again I hear various versions of the famous rant from the Oscar winning 1976 movie “Network”, where Peter Finch playing the part of “Howard Beale” says “I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take this any more”. But the words I repeatedly hear from these modern versions of Howard Beale are more nuanced, and revolve around being unwilling to comply with corporate demands to mislead the public in various ways. And all tell stories of widespread soul-destroying corporate media censorship and propaganda which they just cannot tolerate anymore. This ranges from small local outlets all the way to the top stars of major networks. Basically versions of my own story – they just could no longer tolerate the ethical erosion of their chosen profession. So they take an income hit and go independent. Some succeed, others not so much. And some seem to never be able to completely leave their old reality behind. “You can take the journalist out of the New York Times, but you can’t take the New York Times out of the journalist” is one saying describing the latter. What changed? Is the present reality any different from what has always existed, going back to the “yellow journalism” days of William Randolph Hearst (continuing with the movie theme, see “Citizen Kane”)? Trying to make sense out of the world, I started asking the “old school” journalists that I encounter what they think about this. And what I have discovered is that there is yet another insidious form of attack on our educational system, driven by the corporate interests of large “non-governmental organizations” (including the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation) which have used grants to journalism schools as a way to drive changes in how their graduates have been trained. To be blunt, this is yet another story of the gradual erosion of integrity due to the pernicious influence of massive accumulations of wealth by a few who weaponize that wealth to advance both their own power and various social agendas. Under the influence of large “grants” (I think they would more appropriately be called “strategic investments”), many journalism schools have taken to teaching “advocacy journalism.” Which is basically a fancy term for propaganda. Apparently news media now hire journalists specifically to report with skewed biases on topics of interest to these corporations (or governments), often with corporate sponsorship. Let that sink in for a moment. The advocacy journalists are often paid by an outside organization with an agenda. So let’s figure this out what exactly is going on, starting by defining terms. The definition of advocacy journalism from Meridian Webster is: “journalism that advocates a cause or expresses a viewpoint”. To me, that sounds like how one might define propaganda. So, am I wrong? The definition of “propaganda” (Meridian Webster ) is: the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one’s cause or to damage an opposing cause Hmmm. Very interesting. The definitions for “advocacy journalism” and propaganda are essentially THE SAME. Well, THAT is a whole lot of double speak. It is truly a Brave New World. To quote the Amazon synopsis of that classic tome, “Aldous Huxley’s profoundly important classic of world literature, Brave New World is a searching vision of an unequal, technologically-advanced future where humans are genetically bred, socially indoctrinated, and pharmaceutically anesthetized to passively uphold an authoritarian ruling order–all at the cost of our freedom, full humanity, and perhaps also our souls.” Sound familiar? Now, why is this important? Because increasingly journalism is taught by those who believe that “classic journalism” – which required that both sides of an issue be presented, (you know – “fair and balanced”), is outdated and deserves to die a quiet death. This is exemplified by a Wiki definition of advocacy journalism that is frankly astounding. Classic tenets of journalism call for objectivity and neutrality. These are antiquated principles no longer universally observed…. We must absolutely not feel bound by them. If we are ever to create meaningful change, advocacy journalism will be the single most crucial element to enable the necessary organizing. It is therefore very important that we learn how to be successful advocacy journalists. For many, this will require a different way of identifying and pursuing goals. So, who teaches “advocacy journalism”, and who funds such teachings? Well, for starters – let’s go to one of the premier journalism schools in the USA – Columbia University. How do they view “advocacy journalism”? At Columbia University, one of their programs proudly announces the following: CALLING FOR COALITIONS: BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN JOURNALISTS AND ADVOCATES Journalism is being hit hard globally, and some even predict the end of independent journalism in the global south, especially in Africa. It’s time to look at what may survive. Philanthropic funding will become more essential, and donors will be eager to expand partnerships between journalism and advocacy groups. Through this project, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Media Partnerships team explored the dynamics of such collaborations. Drawing from multiple case studies, the project provided recommendations for foundations, nonprofits and media organizations that maximize impact, respecting a shared covenant. Their partner in developing advocacy journalism training programs, with the expansion of such funding is… the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Unbelievable. But now there is a new “style” of journalism that has become quite the fad. This subset of advocacy journalism is called “solutions journalism”, and it is the term that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation like to use for their funding mechanisms to influence governments, citizens and leaders. Of course advocacy journalism is basically a “nicer, kinder” form of propaganda… Right? You know like when people call censorship – “cancel culture.” Because cancel culture sounds so much “nicer” than censorship… After all, what Twitter, Linked-in and You Tube are doing by banning people and content is for all “our” benefit, right? Speaking plainly, what these modern media companies are doing is really a form of book burning. See Ray Bradbury’s masterpiece Fahrenheit 451 for further on that. Large donors or sponsors are giving money to media corporations to bias reporting via “solutions journalism”. And clearly various governments are also influencing what is allowed to be discussed and in what ways. For further on that, see our prior substack concerning the “Overton Window”. These sponsors can be non-governmental organizations, or also governments or global non-govermental organizations such as the Zuckerberg-Chan initiative, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, United Nations, World Health Organization or World Economic Foundation. These groups seek out “private-public” partnerships (which, as previously noted, is basically another euphemism for what Benito Mussolini defined as Fascism). And they seek these relationships by using advocacy journalism – propaganda to sway public opinion. Sometimes they even fund specific investigations. When this happens, who is compromised? Clearly, Truth and Integrity are immediate casualties. All for the greater good of the greatest number of people, of course. As defined by the organization giving the money. Conflict of Interest? Bill Gates Gave $319 Million to Major Media Outlets, Documents Reveal. The defender November, 2021. According to MintPress News, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donated at least $319 million to fund media projects at hundreds of organizations including CNN, NBC, NPR, PBS and The Atlantic, raising questions about those news outlets’ ability to report objectively on Gates and his work. It is important to realize that biases and opinions have always been a part of journalism. Generally, we previously called these pieces “editorials”. When editorials are grouped together, they used to form the “opinion page.” An antiquated term, I know. Of course, we all know that some newspapers are “liberal” and some “republican.” Of course biases do creep into reporting and in fact, every newspaper’s reputation is built on those biases. But this is different. This is allowing a non-profit governmental organization (at best), a corporation or government (at worst) to control the content of a newspaper or magazine through secret hand-shakes, grants and contracts. It is allowing psy-ops operations a front row seat into influencing the minds of the reader. This is a whole other ball-game, and it needs to stop or at the very least, be called out and recognized for what it is: corporate and state-sponsored propaganda. Advocacy journalists can and are influenced by governmental policies. For instance, the NY Times recently described a new hire as “joining The New York Times as a technology reporter covering disinformation and all of its tentacles.” The pejorative use of the word “tentacles” pretty much shows what biases the new reporter is expected to have. The implication being that information not disseminated by the US government is disinformation, whether the topic be on climate change, diversity, elections, physician’s right to try or infectious disease. BTW: Any one else notice how the disinformation list keeps growing longer? How does the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) or global information control fit into the campaign against “disinformation’? The TNI is basically a treaty management organization managed by the British Broadcasting Corporation which uses advocacy journalism to control content of news media through out the “free” world. Does this mean that only that “news” or PR spin which a government or world body wishes to be advanced can be allowed to be published or electronically distributed in some way? Advocacy journalism which promotes a certain viewpoint fits right in with the TNI model. The long strange evolution of the TNI, from election interference to COVID-19 total information management shows the extent to which power corrupts, and that those being corrupted often have no idea that they are being corrupted. “Journalists” who are trained or coopted into buying into the idea that there is “one truth,” one right answer, and that governments are honest brokers in the assessment of that truth are not “fair and balanced”. They are naive and dangerous. Governments do lie, and what they offer as truth is often better termed mis- dis- and mal- information. Which is precisely why advocacy journalism (ergo propaganda) is dangerous. In a democracy, if an electorate is to be able to make appropriately informed choices, the news must be free from government (and corporate interest group) interference, reported from all angles, from all points of view – not just one narrow reading of the “truth”, as presented by big brother. The problem is that this truly is a slippery slope. How does a newspaper or content provider determine what propaganda is “good” or “bad”? How is disinformation determined? Does the government get to decide? The “Trusted News Initiative” leadership? What about the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, are they to be the arbiters of truth? Should a newspaper, magazine, or broadcaster try to make a determination about the impact on objectivity before accepting funds or making commitments to the government? Once upon a time (note the fairy tale prelude) most “established” legacy media tried to maintain a firewall between their “news” and “op-ed” operations. How antiquated that now seems. Does the organization being paid to present one point of view have an obligation to be transparent? To disclose conflicts of interest? Do they need to provide the public with the contract, the information on how they are being paid to bias the news they are reporting, their relationship with the TNI, etc.? What happens when the information control comes in the form of stopping certain types of mis- dis- or mal- information that the government doesn’t want reporters to write on? Or threatens to label those who communicate such as domestic terrorists? What happens when the sponsor wants the advocacy journalism to include marketing campaigns that basically target individuals viewed as opposition? Does the newspaper have an obligation to inform the public that they are being nudged? The ethical morass that this type of journalism creates is huge. All we can hope is that institutions teaching journalism begin to recognize the dangers of promoting advocacy or solutions journalism and return back to the classic tenets of journalism, those being objectivity and neutrality. And restore integrity to the discipline. Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Subscribe now Available for pre-order, publication date – June 2022   Like Comment Share You’re a free subscriber to Who is Robert Malone. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. Subscribe © 2022 Robert W Malone, MD Unsubscribe Virginia

Now on the other hand, here is a WRITER—I don’t know who he is; his handle is Good Citizen on Substack. I’ll tell you this. If I could, I’d appoint him to head up negotiations between Russia and the Ukraine in a New York minute. Screw in your brain tightly and read what he recently laid down in one of his carpet bombing runs:

“Imagine this scenario of aggression. Russia has established something called SATA. (Surround America Together Alliance) with the Bahamas, Cuba, Canada and all of Central America. Article 5 of SATA says if one goes to war, they all go to war. Putin is trying to get Mexico to join. He orchestrated a coup there in 2014 and installed a puppet dictator who helps enrich Putin through Putin’s crack head son. He keeps assuring Mexico they will join SATA one day, even though the other countries would not approve the vote and they don’t meet some minimum requirements. Other politicians in the duma send their kids to be on boards of Mexican companies to collect paychecks of $50,000 per month. Russia keeps sending weapons to Mexico who has a neo-Nazi force of nationalists near the border who take shots at English speaking American separatists who would prefer to be part of the United States. Cease fires are broken 2000 times over 8 years, leaving 14,000 dead in the conflict. The U.S. has taken a patient stance, trying to reason with the Mexican coke-head dictator but he keeps accepting SATA weapons and money. Last week the Mexican dictator said he doesn’t just want SATA membership, he wants Russian nukes in his country aimed at the United States. That was the final straw. Tuesday the U.S. launched air strikes across Mexico and declared those English speaking American states as independent republics.”

It’s hard for Americans to consider that they’re living in a news bubble cut off from reality. That grisly fate is supposed to befall lesser countries.

And when American news involves foreign policy, the bubble is double, because that’s where American oligarchs have traditionally stolen a great deal of their money, and “don’t tell the children” has always been the motto of the CIA.

COVID-19: A Study in Psychological Coercion & Hypnosis February 23, 2022 By fortiori fortiori@tutanota.com We respect your privacy—there are no ads, cookies, or trackers on this site. If you find this journalism worthwhile, please consider taking advantage of our offer on our support page, here. We’ve invested everything into this project, all help is welcome.

Author’s Note: Please consider saving this evidence – before the powers that shouldn’t be shove it down the memory hole. Click Image for Larger Version This pandemic is so scripted and contrived you can practically see the puppet strings at work on nearly all of the participating politicians and media personalities. Given that they are winding down the virus propaganda machine just in time to ramp up the war propaganda machine – until the next virus comes along right on cue – let’s put those scripted fear-mongering lies under a microscope and examine them in order to arm ourselves with the knowledge we need to guard ourselves against the next wave of deception: New Normal  ●  Alone Together  ●  Build Back Better  ●  Flatten the Curve Stay Home Save Lives  ●  Protect/Save the NHS  ●  We’re all in this together Test, Trace, Treat  ●  Stay smart, Stay Safe, Stay Open  ●  We Stay Home! Don’t Panic, Don’t Rush, Don’t Overstock  ●  Only You Can Prevent the Spread Stay Home, Your Home is Your Lifeline  ●  Stay Home, Save Lives, Avoid Stage 5 NHS: We Stay At Work for You – You Stay At Home For Us  ●  COVID Ends With You Follow The Science  ●  Trust The Science  ●  Believe In The Science Be Informed, Be Prepared, Be Smart, Be Safe: Be Ready to Fight COVID-19 The vaccine will save us  ●  The booster will save us  ●  The 4th dose is the answer Your freedom ends where your contagion begins  ●  Self Isolate! I wear my mask to protect you and you wear your mask to protect me It’s Safe and Effective  ●  Out of an abundance of caution There is no evidence that the vaccine is harmful… THE SCIENCE IS YOUR NEW GOD AND IT IS WHAT WE SAY IT IS These are not science terms and phrases. They are hypnotic chants meant to induce an audience into a suggestive state of mind – this is why they are repeated over and over and over again. Furthermore, masking has historically been an integral part of an initiation ritual: in our case the initiation into the “new normal” the globalists have planned for us. Put another way all of this was one giant world-wide psychological operation. Here is a collection of authorities admitting this with its horrible effects woven through them. Take the time to read through this–the crimes are horrible: Click Image for Larger Version Click Image for Larger Version

Watch Yevhen Karas the leader of Ukraine's neo-Nazi terror gang C14's speech from Kiev earlier this month. Straight from the horses' mouth, he dispels the many narratives pushed by the left, the mainstream media and the State Department. pic.twitter.com/VWJqWPUGUp

— Alex Rubinstein (@RealAlexRubi) February 27, 2022

I have not followed Glenn Beck, my impression was that he was a good guy. Anyone have a more knowledgeable take on this guy?

February 28, 2022   TOP STORIES YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY     Poll: 23% of HCWs Likely to Leave Industry Owing to Pandemic       Severe COVID-19 Increases Risk for Peripheral Nerve Damage       Amid Pandemic, Nurses Also Facing Variety of Workplace Abuse       Report: CDC Not Publishing Large Amounts of COVID-19 Data       PTSD Symptoms Common in Families of COVID Patients       Sanofi-GSK COVID Vax Highly Effective; FDA Approval Sought       Children and COVID: The Omicron Surge Has Become a Retreat       US Vaccination Drive Is Bottoming Out as Omicron Subsides       ACIP ’22 Child/Adolescent Immunization Schedule: What’s New?       COVID-Related MIS-C May Be More Common Sequela Than Thought     Read all the latest news on Medscape ›

Funny how this is playing out. Some concern that Russia is using the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant Area as a staging grounds. Brilliant strategy, as they cannot be shelled their, but it’s a dangerous game.

I did a post a while back that consisted only of Maps of the region. The area closest to Russia is called the Donbas, and it is almost all Russian people. Ukraine was fashioned together from a bunch of different regions and peoples. It’s a fascinating story.

And you know with Biden extorting them to fire an honest official to their own toady could be installed….in exchange for $1B loan guarantee….I wonder how much of that $1B was routed back to “the big guy”

It looks like Press Secretary Andrew Bates already deleted his tweet, but it shall live in infamy in this screen capture.

This is another good article. The new fake Rulers hold us in complete disdain. Jen Psaki is the condescending face of the Biden administration

https://nypost.com/2022/02/23/jen-psaki-is-the-condescending-face-of-the-biden-administration/

And here is another image that speaks volumes……..you poor little peon have you not yet realized who the ruling class is.

stockWrites stock’s NWO Ponderings ·Feb 21This is part of the COVID shenanigans…… Klaus Schwab — WEF — Really Do Intend To Take Away All Private Property Rights, Enslave You and Take Away Country Sovereignty have been aware of this for I guess, years. But it was so absurd that I often wondered whether this was just made up, so that normies could point to “crazy conspiracy” theorists. But I found it, amazingly preserved on YouTube so I immediately copied it, stored on harddrive, and uploaded to Bitchute. https://deeperdivedata.blogspot.com/2022/02/klaus-schwab-wef-really-do-intend-to.htmlY’all need to do that stuff also! ON the bottom bottom is a cringe worthy interview posted on Jun 25, 2021 (just about the same time that the CDC started re-coding Vax injuries and deaths in the USA as happening in another country) —posted by the Global ShapersAt the end of these still images is the video that was generated by their Twitter Post. The Twitter post has since been taken down, so it is great that someone preserved this.

denis bider replied to your comment

FYI, BlogSpot is owned and controlled by Google, and will deplatform you.

Good reminder, they when I discovered the hot lots, killer batches in July 2021 and published it, they not allowed shut down my blog, they went out of the way to wipe out 10 years of reporting on 1000 subjects. Some of them could be “found” but they would all 404. Fortunately I had a full backup from like 1 week before, so I restored and self hosted, although blogger does special coding so that things don’t work out smoothly or fully. That said I am going to migrate to WordPress (hate them too) whilst I have full control and access to my blogger, and Ill run both concurrently until I can get Google to attack free speech again…….would be awesome to set up a lawsuit.

2ReplyGive giftDelete

denis bider32 min agoFYI, BlogSpot is owned and controlled by Google, and will deplatform you.

stock here: how will they “normalize” abnormal anti-social behavior? Concerned parents whose kids went through the abuse, lonliness, masking bullshit, should really bone up on ways that they can recover from, or mitigate the damages done.

Other damages are speech related, and probably even worse, a lessened ability to read the emotions of others…..just when they push their “empathy” narrative.

One reason Klaus is where he is, and why he still has such a strong German accent? The accent is part of this whole program. If he spoke clear English, the bullshit and deception in his narratives would be closer to the surface….the accent hides them a bit more.

stock here: It’s pretty good analysis. The rabbit hole runs deep. Yet “just following orders” does not cut it in the case of Genocide.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/TPdzPuuBAAod/

stock here. Disgusting to watch them do this….when it is the most important, like the election. Even with hacks like Chris Wallace gone, they still suck.

LOL Biden Strong Putin Weak Anxious and Stuttering, yeah right

stock here. This is from a site called OpenVAERS

VAERS COVID Vaccine
Adverse Event Reports for Ages 17 and Younger
(from US/Territories/Unknown)

On Friday February 11, Pfizer abruptly withdrew its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application to inject mRNA into children under 5 years old.[1] At the time, the FDA and Pfizer claimed that they wanted to wait for more data on the effects of the third dose.[2] Several days later former FDA Commissioner and current Pfizer Board Member Scott Gottlieb claimed that they pulled the EUA because Covid-19 cases were so low in that population that the results were not significant.[3]

But none of these explanations suffice because all of that information was known prior to Pfizer submitting this EUA to the FDA on February 1. It makes one wonder whether adverse events in the treatment group might be the factor that neither Pfizer nor the FDA want to talk about?

So we decided to look at reports of injury associated with Covid-19 vaccines in children 17 and younger. Remember, these shots have only been on the market for a short while and only children 5 to 17 are eligible. We created a separate page called Child Reports that will update automatically as new reports come in.

https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-reports?utm_source=newsletter_17&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the-openvaers-red-box-report

We were shocked by what we found — 34,223 VAERS reports in the U.S. in this age range including infants harmed through transmission from the mother via breast milk, lots of reports of kids receiving shots who were too young (either the parents lied about their age or the doctor/pharmacy made a mistake with screening or dosing), and heartbreaking reports of myocarditis and death. You can read the 34,223 reports yourself (here). As always, the reports are not perfect, but it’s the only system that we have.

As you can see, there is already sufficient evidence to remove these Covid-19 vaccines from the market for all age groups.

Thank you for sharing the truth with others.

stock here: I heard this famous Doctor died unexpectedly in his sleep, at 62 YO. Thin, healthy looking guy. So I figured it was the vax.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/08/20/1029263796/theyre-asking-biden-to-vaccinate-the-world-its-not-fair-but-its-not-impossible

And it was.

Five months post-covid, Nicole Murphy’s heart rate is still doing strange things

The prevalence of such symptoms has experts projecting a ‘tidal wave’ of cardiovascular cases related directly and indirectly to the coronavirus

stock here: Note that the injuries in Military did not increase in 2020, but did increase as soon as the COVID shots were given out.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/02/21/covid-cardiac-issues-longterm/

stock here. False flags are not something new. Hatred needs to be created and reinforced.

https://coffeeordie.com/operation-himmler/

—————————————————————

However, the attack was not carried out by willing Polish participants. It was part of a series of false-flag attacks that the Germans staged against themselves during a clever deception dubbed “Operation Himmler.” Nazi High Command used several “border incidents” to create the appearance of Polish aggression to justify Hitler’s invasion into Poland, sparking the beginning of World War II. 

“I will provide a propagandistic casus belli,” Hitler told his generals on Aug. 22, 1939. “Its credibility doesn’t matter. The victor will not be asked whether he told the truth.”

Two separate raids occurred near the German village of Hochlinden and at a forestry office in Pitschen. Six prisoners were taken from the Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp, dressed in Polish military uniforms, and executed. The sophisticated and well-choreographed propaganda wing then spread the lies to the press. The Nazi High Command took the lessons they learned from previous border incidents and applied them to their most famous black propaganda raid in what became known as the Gleiwitz incident. 

• Great resource here, this is a blogspot, so I am amazed Google has not taken them down.
• https://realcovidresearch.blogspot.com/2021/12/why-you-need-to-check-fact-checkers-see.html
• Hydroxychloroquine WORKS – Here’s the Evidence
• Ivermectin WORKS – Here’s the Evidence
• Monoclonal Antibodies WORK – Here’s the Evidence
• Your Immune System is AMAZING! See Videos
• Budesonide Works – Here’s the Evidence
• Why Vitamin D3 is CRITICAL for Treating COVID
• NATURAL IMMUNITY gives FAR GREATER PROTECTION from COVID, than Vaccines: See the Evidence
• Was Polio Eradicated by Vaccines? Here’s the Evidence that says: NO!
• Was Smallpox Eradicated by Vaccines? Here’s the Evidence that says: NO!
• Countries that Beat Covid WITHOUT VACCINES
• Why you should STOP all strenuous exercise (and STAY AWAY from SOFT DRINKS and ENERGY DRINKS) if you have COVID
• Can you DETOX or RESET Your Health After a COVID Vaccine?
• Why You Shouldn’t Dismiss NATURAL Treatments
• See Why Nurses Call Remdesivir “Run, Death Is Near”
• How to Get Treatments that ACTUALLY WORK
• RESOURCES FOR VACCINE INJURIES