stock here: Gemini was pulling punches, so items -1) and 0) are mine:
-1) So Tony, did you think your legacy was going to be the Doctor most known for facilitating the Great Genocide of 2021, likely killing 500M after all the morbidity, turbo cancers, play their role throughout time?
0) So Tony, aren’t you mad that your handlers, the Jesuits and Globalists, used you and your position, but they didn’t think you could be trusted with the front knowledge that the “vaccine” was really a Bio-Weapon of around 100 different types, with the most poisonous ones shipped to like 20 states so that there was not a concentrated death toll that would give the plan away? You got jabbed and almost died months later, aren’t you mad?
A legal deposition of a public official like Dr. Anthony Fauci—who served across multiple administrations and led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for nearly four decades—would focus heavily on scientific definitions, internal communications, federal recordkeeping, and public health policy trade-offs. In a formal deposition under oath, the most rigorous questions are designed to pin down specific timelines, financial oversight, and exact definitions rather than partisan talking points.
Here are 10 of the most technically direct, hard-hitting questions a deposition attorney would present:
1. On Gain-of-Function Definitions and NIH Funding
“Dr. Fauci, in 2014, the federal government paused funding for Gain-of-Function research. In 2017, the P3CO framework was created to oversee enhanced potential pandemic pathogens. Did the sub-grants provided to EcoHealth Alliance for research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology technically meet the HHS definition of ‘enhanced potential pandemic pathogen’ research, and if not, what precise scientific threshold excluded them from P3CO review?”
2. On Internal Recordkeeping and FOIA Transparency
“Under oath, can you detail all instructions or guidance you gave to staff regarding the use of personal email addresses, private messaging apps, or the deletion of official emails related to the origins of SARS-CoV-2 between January 2020 and December 2022?”
3. On the February 1, 2020 “Proximal Origin” Teleconference
“On February 1, 2020, you organized a teleconference with several prominent virologists who initially expressed concern that SARS-CoV-2 showed signs of lab engineering. Within weeks, those same scientists authored the ‘Proximal Origin’ paper concluding a natural origin was the only plausible explanation. What specific primary scientific data was presented between Feb 1 and Feb 16 that changed their conclusions?”
4. On the Evolution of the “6-Foot Distance” Rule
“During your testimony before Congress, you noted that the 6-foot social distancing guidance ‘sort of just appeared’ without robust clinical trial backing. Who specifically drafted that operational metric within the federal response team, and why was it presented to the public as a firm scientific imperative rather than a working guideline?”
5. On Mask Guidance Reversals and Public Trust
“In March 2020, you publicly advised against wearing masks, later stating this was intended to prevent a run on PPE for healthcare workers. From a public health communication standpoint, what objective metrics were used to determine that misleading the public about mask efficacy was preferable to issuing an explicit warning about supply shortages?”
6. On Natural Immunity vs. Vaccine-Induced Immunity
“By late 2021, broad international data demonstrated that prior infection provided robust, durable protection against severe disease. Why did federal public health guidance and vaccine mandates consistently refuse to recognize natural immunity as equivalent to vaccination for employment and travel requirements?”
7. On School Closures and Pediatric Risk
“In early 2020, data from European countries like Sweden and France indicated that young children were at extremely low risk for severe COVID-19 and were not primary drivers of community transmission. What specific thresholds or indicators did the NIAID require before formally recommending the reopening of K-12 schools?”
8. On Scientific Consensus and Social Media Moderation
“Did you, or any personnel acting under your direct supervision, communicate with White House officials, the CDC, or social media companies regarding the flagging, downranking, or suppression of the Great Barrington Declaration or scientists advocating for focused protection?”
9. On Clinical Trial Protocols and Early Outpatient Therapeutics
“During the early months of the pandemic, what specific allocation of NIAID funding was directed toward conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for off-patent, repurposed outpatient treatments versus novel pharmaceutical therapeutics?”
10. On Conflicts of Interest and Royalties
“Can you provide a complete, unredacted accounting of all third-party royalties paid to you and senior NIAID leadership by pharmaceutical companies between 2015 and 2023, and explain the exact internal conflict-of-interest recusal protocols enforced during vaccine approval processes?”