stock here, this study was quoted in several stories, but no one linked back to the study, although 1 named the study. I found the study, LOL, using AI. here is the study. I will also download it, as this could easily get censored.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/7/1343
The other articles did interpret the results correctly, I was apprehensive and cautious. Bottom line: If you got 2 COVID Vaccines, your life expectancy is cut by 37%, so if you had 20 more years of life left, you gave up, on average 7.4 years. And that says nothing of the quality of those remaining years. See the deep blue highlight below.

HR means Hazard Ratio, I made this table to make it clear. Getting Jabbed is more dangerous than having diabetes or Cardio Vascular Disease. It’s not quite as bad as having Kidney Disease.

This is table 4 from the study, seriously, open the study and peruse it yourself.


I don’t want to confound my own work, but this…..
table 5 from the study is here, its for three covid vaccines, I will send table 4, 2 shots, in the next box, i dont understand why the RMTL for unvaccinated drop from 7.4 to 4.6 can you explain what that really means, so wait for the next post
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
In this table (Table 5), the Restricted Mean Time Lost (RMTL) measures the average time “lost” in terms of survival compared to a hypothetical perfect survival time within the study period.
Here’s a breakdown of what’s happening:
RMST (Restricted Mean Survival Time):
The vaccinated group with three doses has an RMST of 573.7 days, while the unvaccinated group has an RMST of 574 days.
This small difference (−0.8 days) suggests that, on average, the three-dose vaccinated group lived slightly less time than the unvaccinated group within the study’s observation window (579 days).
RMTL (Restricted Mean Time Lost):
For the three-dose vaccinated group, the RMTL is 5.3 days, meaning this group "lost" 5.3 days on average in terms of survival during the study period.
For the unvaccinated group, the RMTL is 4.6 days, meaning they "lost" 4.6 days on average in terms of survival.
Key Difference:
The unvaccinated group has a lower RMTL (4.6 days) compared to the vaccinated group (5.3 days), implying that the unvaccinated group lost less time on average in this study.
The RMTL ratio of 1.17 means that the three-dose vaccinated group lost 17% more survival time compared to the unvaccinated group.
Why the drop from 7.4 to 4.6?
The RMTL drop you’re referring to, from 7.4 in a different table (which likely represents two doses) to 4.6 for the unvaccinated in this table (three doses), could be attributed to different population characteristics or study parameters between these two dose comparisons. In other words:
When considering only two doses, the unvaccinated group might have had a higher average time lost (RMTL = 7.4), potentially due to different health factors or exposures.
When the analysis shifts to a three-dose comparison (Table 5), the unvaccinated group sees a lower time lost (RMTL = 4.6), suggesting that the time lost for unvaccinated individuals appears smaller in this context.
The reasons for this drop would depend on study-specific factors such as population health characteristics, pandemic waves, or statistical adjustments made in the analysis. It reflects how these metrics can change based on different vaccination status comparisons. The next post you mentioned might clarify more as we compare two versus three doses.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
In Table 4, the Restricted Mean Time Lost (RMTL) for the unvaccinated group is 7.4 days, while for the two-dose vaccinated group, it’s 10.1 days. This indicates that the two-dose vaccinated group lost, on average, more time in terms of survival than the unvaccinated group during the study period (739 days).
Here’s what it means:
The RMTL for unvaccinated dropped from 7.4 (in Table 4) to 4.6 (in Table 5 for three doses): This decrease suggests that, on average, the unvaccinated group "lost" fewer days in the context of three-dose comparisons (Table 5) than they did when compared with the two-dose group (Table 4). This change could reflect various factors like how the unvaccinated population's outcomes improved or the vaccinated population's outcomes worsened with a higher number of doses.
Between-group contrast (RMTL ratio of 1.37 in Table 4): This means that the two-dose vaccinated group lost 37% more survival time than the unvaccinated group.
In comparison to Table 5, the three-dose group’s RMTL ratio was 1.17, meaning they lost 17% more time than the unvaccinated group. This suggests that the relative difference in time lost between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations becomes smaller as the number of doses increases.
To summarize:
In the two-dose comparison (Table 4), unvaccinated individuals had a higher RMTL (7.4 days), suggesting more time lost.
However, in the three-dose comparison (Table 5), the unvaccinated group appears to have fared better with a lower RMTL (4.6 days).
The exact reasons for this change could involve a variety of factors like population health differences, varying immunity levels, or other study-specific conditions, but the general trend shows that in the two-dose analysis, the vaccinated group experienced greater time lost than in the three-dose analysis.