stock here, some backgrounder? I called out the assault on injections of mRNA into pregnant women as it happened. I forget the details now, but the process was “sold” through a nefarious setup of propaganda and fear mongering. I had a few female friends (bank / stores / Starbucks) in mid / early 2021who were pregnant, and I advised them of the risks and as far as I know they did not get injected, and all now have healthy babies / toddlers now.
Dr. Mike Yeadon Comments on “The mRNA-based pseudo-“vaccines” destroy over 60% of non-renewable egg supply of female rats.” by Suavek
But let’s Review the Debacle of the 1960’s.
The statement:
“Since thalidomide in the early 1960s, all new medical interventions have been considered as presumptive reproductive toxins”
Reflects a regulatory and ethical shift in how new drugs and medical treatments are evaluated for safety, especially regarding pregnancy and fetal development.
🔬 Background: The Thalidomide Disaster
Thalidomide was a sedative introduced in the late 1950s and widely used by pregnant women to treat nausea and insomnia.
It was marketed as safe — even for pregnancy — but was never tested adequately on pregnant animals or for reproductive toxicity.
Result: Between 10,000 and 20,000 babies worldwide were born with severe birth defects, especially malformed limbs (phocomelia).
The disaster was a major turning point in drug regulation and public awareness of teratogenic (birth-defect-causing) risks.
🧪 Impact on Regulation
In response:
Regulatory agencies like the FDA (USA), EMA (Europe), and others tightened requirements.
All new drugs are now presumed to be reproductive toxins unless proven otherwise.
Developers must conduct specific reproductive toxicology studies before approval:
Fertility studies
Embryo-fetal development studies (in animals)
Pre- and post-natal development studies
This precautionary approach is sometimes described as “guilty until proven innocent” for reproductive safety.
🧠 Broader Ethical and Clinical Implications
Pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials — creating a data gap that can hinder informed treatment decisions.
This can lead to under-treatment of pregnant individuals out of fear, even when a drug might be safe or necessary.
It also influenced the development of pregnancy category labeling (e.g., the old FDA categories A, B, C, D, X — now replaced with detailed labeling).
⚖️ Summary
The thalidomide tragedy led to a precautionary paradigm:
All new drugs and interventions are assumed to carry reproductive risk until sufficient evidence shows otherwise.
This has improved safety but also introduced complexities in balancing risk and benefit, especially in pregnant populations.
Would you like a list of how different countries classify reproductive toxicity today or how this affects vaccine development?