stock here: Seriously this may be the largest news of the last few decades. Who is he going to replace them with?
Huuwah!!!
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/rfk-jr-removing-17-members-cdcs-vaccine-advisory/story?id=122670046
LOL A-Eye tried to avoid the question entirely……
As of June 11, 2025, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has dismissed all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), citing conflicts of interest and a desire to restore public trust in vaccine science. While he has not announced replacements, several individuals associated with Kennedy’s health agenda and the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement are potential candidates.en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1
Potential Replacements for ACIP
- Dr. Casey Means
A physician and wellness advocate, Dr. Means is a prominent figure in the MAHA movement and has been considered for roles within the Department of Health and Human Services. She has close ties to Kennedy and his health initiatives. - Del Bigtree
An outspoken anti-vaccine activist and founder of the Informed Consent Action Network, Bigtree has been involved in Kennedy’s political campaigns and is known for his controversial views on vaccine safety. - Nicole Shanahan
Kennedy’s former running mate, Shanahan has been vocal in supporting his health policies and has threatened political retribution against senators who did not vote to confirm him as Health Secretary. - MAHA Commission Members
The MAHA Commission, chaired by Kennedy and including figures like Linda McMahon and Russell Vought, is aligned with his health agenda. Members of this commission may be considered for positions on ACIP.
Implications
Kennedy’s decision to overhaul ACIP has raised concerns among public health experts about the potential politicization of vaccine policy. The American Medical Association has criticized the move, warning that it could undermine public trust in vaccines. The next ACIP meeting is scheduled for late June, and it remains to be seen whether new members can be appointed in time.time.com+1timesofindia.indiatimes.com+1
While Kennedy has not publicly named replacements, the individuals and groups mentioned above are closely associated with his health policies and may play a role in shaping future vaccine recommendations.
Sources
You said:
what about tenpenny, or malone, or even kirsch?
ChatGPT said:
As of June 11, 2025, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s dismissal of all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has led to speculation about potential replacements. While Kennedy has not officially announced new appointees, several individuals associated with vaccine skepticism and aligned with Kennedy’s views have been mentioned as possible candidates.
Potential Candidates for ACIP
- Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
A prominent figure in the anti-vaccine movement, Dr. Tenpenny has been a vocal critic of vaccine safety and efficacy. Her inclusion in ACIP could align with Kennedy’s stance on vaccine policy. - Dr. Robert Malone
Known for his controversial views on mRNA vaccines, Dr. Malone has been associated with vaccine skepticism. His appointment could influence the direction of vaccine policy under Kennedy’s leadership. - Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Although his medical license was revoked, Dr. Wakefield’s past research linking vaccines to autism has made him a figure of interest among vaccine skeptics. His inclusion would likely be contentious. - Dr. Judy Mikovits
A former researcher with controversial theories about vaccines, Dr. Mikovits has been a figure in the anti-vaccine community. Her appointment would be highly controversial and could face significant opposition. - Del Bigtree
A filmmaker and activist known for promoting anti-vaccine views, Bigtree has been involved in Kennedy’s political campaigns. His appointment could signal a shift towards more vaccine-critical perspectives in public health policy.
Implications of Potential Appointments
The appointment of individuals with vaccine-skeptical views to ACIP could lead to significant changes in U.S. vaccine policy. Critics argue that such appointments may undermine public trust in vaccines and public health institutions. The American Medical Association has expressed concerns that these changes could erode confidence in immunization efforts and potentially lead to increased disease outbreaks. vanityfair.com+1washingtonpost.com+1
As of now, these individuals have not been officially appointed to ACIP, and the full impact of Kennedy’s decisions on vaccine policy remains to be seen.
Sources
You said:
do you know about kirsch
ChatGPT said:
Yes, Steve Kirsch is a tech entrepreneur who became widely known during the COVID-19 pandemic for promoting vaccine misinformation and opposing mainstream public health guidance.
Background on Steve Kirsch:
- Career: He made his fortune in Silicon Valley, founding several tech companies, including Infoseek and Propel.
- COVID-19 Involvement: During the pandemic, Kirsch emerged as a prominent critic of COVID-19 vaccines and public health measures. He claimed that vaccines were dangerous and ineffective—statements that have been widely discredited by scientific experts and fact-checkers.
- Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF): He founded this organization to promote his views, but it has been described by critics as a platform for disinformation.
- Controversy: He has been banned from several platforms for spreading misinformation and has made claims that have been consistently debunked by public health authorities, including the CDC and WHO.
Likelihood of Being Appointed to ACIP:
While Kirsch aligns ideologically with some of RFK Jr.’s views, especially regarding vaccine skepticism, there are significant barriers to him being formally appointed to a panel like the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP):
- Lack of Medical or Public Health Credentials: Kirsch is not a physician, epidemiologist, or immunologist, which is typically a prerequisite for appointment to a scientific advisory panel.
- Highly Polarizing Figure: His public statements and lack of alignment with evidence-based science would likely provoke intense backlash from the medical community, Congress, and international health organizations.
Bottom Line:
It’s unlikely, though not impossible, that someone like Kirsch would be appointed to ACIP. However, he could play an informal advisory role or influence other Kennedy appointees more aligned with his views. If Kennedy continues to reshape federal health agencies around vaccine-critical perspectives, Kirsch might find a role within that broader ecosystem—even if not officially on ACIP.