I found several positive comments and articles from left-leaning sources about Kamala Harris, though they often focus on her historic role and advocacy rather than widespread public acclaim.
Representation and Historic Achievement: Harris is frequently celebrated for being the first female, Black, and South Asian vice president. Her election is viewed as a significant milestone in representation, especially for marginalized communities. Progressive commentators highlight her presence in such a high office as inspiring, symbolizing progress for women and minorities
National Catholic Register
.
Support for Marginalized Groups: Many leftist voices emphasize her advocacy for marginalized communities. For example, her focus on immigration reform and her efforts to tackle the “root causes” of migration in Central America are praised as a compassionate alternative to previous hardline approaches
Star Tribune
.
STOCK HERE --this third one is really a repeat of 1 and 2, exactly, and the 4th one is a repeat of 2...............................
Women’s Rights and Abortion Advocacy: Harris’s strong pro-choice stance and her defense of women’s reproductive rights resonate with many on the left, especially in light of recent changes in state laws. She has been actively campaigning for abortion access, framing her work as crucial to protecting women’s autonomy and health. This has drawn support from groups and individuals who prioritize reproductive rights as a core political issue
National Catholic Register
Star Tribune
.
Engagement with the LGBTQ+ Community: Progressive LGBTQ+ groups appreciate her defense of gender-affirming care and anti-discrimination policies, positioning her as a key ally against conservative efforts to limit LGBTQ+ rights. Her vocal support for the trans community, including discussing the impact of gender-affirming care on mental health, has been seen as an essential stance by these groups
Star Tribune
.These positive comments primarily come from those who view her as a critical defender of social justice, women’s rights, and LGBTQ+ issues, reinforcing her appeal among progressive and left-leaning voters who prioritize these causes. However, general enthusiasm from broader audiences remains mixed, with some leftist commentators expressing disappointment about her performance on specific issues, like immigration and her approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict
Here are the comments from the National Catholic Register, the first article———————–
(Edited)
If I need my roof replaced, I typically have several options:
– contractor with 30 years experience
– contractor with 5 years experience
– contractor with no experience, low pricing
Over and over again, it’s been proven that that lowball pricing isn’t worth it, no matter how much the contractor lays out a message of the ‘old school industry doing it wrong’ and ‘needing a fresh set of eyes.’
It’s much more often the case that there’s a minimum number of years of real world experience needed – even for the fresh ideas – for that to translate to professional competency and weed out those who really don’t have it.
It’s true of small business, large business, teaching, CEOs, government.
I’m struck by how little actual experience Mrs. Harris brought to the VP Office in 2022, and how little she has demonstrated competency at the current date.
But both major Parties have largely jettisoned that wisdom, as it suited them, in every national election since 2008.
Kamala is only comfortable speaking in front of two audiences.
- Pro Abortion advocates
and
- Black organizations
Have to agree with GMB. This analysis is deceptively benign of a politician who has shown nothing but hostility toward most matters that might be considered of importance to Catholic voters.
(Edited)
The article did not mention that Harris helped raise funds used to bail out persons who rioted in the fallout from the George Floyd incident. These were not only persons who peacefully protested, but included rioters, looters and arsonists who acted under cover of the outrage over what happened with Mr. Floyd.
Harris is extreme on abortion and other issues antithetical to the Catholic faith. She is not a friend of Catholicism and shows little respect for the 1st Amendment guarantees of freedom of religion.
Hmmm, this is the best the DNC has? DEI selection.
Great pick.
The Minneapolis Star Tribune article had 187 comments, you can go look yourself, I will present the summary only.
Common Themes
Concerns about Kamala Harris's Experience:
Many commenters express skepticism about Harris's qualifications and track record, particularly highlighting a lack of competency and experience.
Some point out her past actions, such as supporting bail funds for rioters, as evidence of her poor judgment and extreme views.
Criticism of Her Political Stances:
A significant number of comments criticize Harris's position on various issues, including abortion and religious freedom, with a particular focus on her perceived hostility toward Catholic values.
There is also frustration regarding her support for LGBTQ+ rights and her stance on Middle Eastern issues, with commenters questioning the logic of her positions and alliances.
Comparisons to Republican Figures:
A recurring pattern is the comparison of Harris to Trump, often in a negative context. Some claim that she is as problematic as Trump, while others argue that her flaws are less severe compared to Trump’s.
A few commenters express the view that voting for Harris is a lesser evil compared to re-electing Trump.
Doubts About Media Coverage and Visibility:
Several commenters accuse Harris of hiding from the media, avoiding press conferences, or not being transparent about her policies.
Some contrast her media presence with Trump’s, questioning why she doesn't engage more with public forums or debates.
Support for Palestinians vs. Criticism of Hamas:
There is a debate among commenters about Harris's support for Palestine, with some arguing that the Palestinian people are distinct from Hamas, while others believe that supporting Palestine indirectly supports Hamas.
Commenters discuss the LGBTQ+ community’s support for Palestinians, pointing out contradictions given the hostile environment for LGBTQ+ individuals in Gaza.
Defending Harris Against Criticism:
Some comments defend Harris, arguing that people should seek out her policies on her website and claiming that criticism stems from a lack of information or bias.
A few voices highlight that Harris has evolved in her stances, emphasizing that it's normal for politicians to change views when new information becomes available.Reaction Overview
Negative: The majority of the comments are critical of Kamala Harris, questioning her competency, policies, and visibility. They often draw parallels to other political figures and raise doubts about her stances on various issues.
Positive/Supportive: There are a handful of comments defending Harris, stressing her capability and calling for voters to educate themselves on her policies.On this YouTube, the comments are generally positive:
The comments on the first video for Kamala Harris’s speech predominantly display strong support and enthusiasm for her candidacy. Here’s a summary with rough counts:
Supportive and Enthusiastic Comments:
Voting Call-to-Action: Many users (50+) encourage others to vote for Harris and promote voting blue in general.
Praise for Speech Delivery: Approximately 40 comments highlight how articulate, coherent, and inspiring they found her speech, often noting this was her best speech to date.
Economic and Policy Support: Around 30 commenters express approval of her economic plan, appreciating its focus on the middle class and small businesses.
Emotional and Personal Appeals: About 20 comments mention feeling hopeful, relieved, or inspired by Harris's message and candidacy.
Comparisons with Trump:
A notable segment (20+) of the comments criticize Donald Trump while praising Harris, often highlighting the contrast between their speeches and policy clarity.
International Support:
At least 10 comments come from international viewers, expressing admiration and support for Harris and her platform.
Skeptical and Critical Comments:
A smaller number (around 10) question the specifics of her policies or express skepticism about her plans, with some asking why certain policies haven't been implemented during her vice presidency.The overall tone is predominantly positive, with substantial engagement from both domestic and international viewers showing support for Kamala Harris and her campaign.
The critical comments on the video for Kamala Harris’s speech were varied but generally focused on skepticism around her track record, doubts about her policy specifics, and criticisms of her messaging. Here are the detailed groupings:
Lack of Specificity and Delivery:
Several commenters (at least 5) pointed out that while Harris spoke about future plans, she failed to provide specifics or details on how those plans would be executed. Examples include:
"How are you going to do all this?"
"I keep hearing her say what she is going to do but I never hear how she is going to do it."
Some questioned why these plans had not been implemented during her vice presidency, indicating doubts about her ability to deliver on her promises.
Criticism of Personal Background and Authenticity:
A few comments (around 3) expressed skepticism about Harris’s portrayal of her upbringing, particularly her claim of growing up middle-class. For instance:
"Her parents are both professors. Why was her mother worried about making ends meet?"
"I’m not convinced; she keeps repeating the 'middle-class struggle' narrative."
These comments imply that some viewers feel she is not being entirely authentic in her representation of her background.
Doubts on Economic and Policy Impact:
Some users (around 3) questioned the feasibility and financing of her economic proposals. Examples include:
"Where is the project of raising taxes to corporate and wealthy that is in her program?"
"How does she plan to finance all that?"
General Skepticism and Disbelief:
A few commenters expressed overall distrust of her as a candidate or politician, reflecting a broader cynicism about political promises:
"If all these things are so easy to do, why have they not been done?"
"This speech was written for her. These are not her words and everyone knows this."
Questioning Impact and Previous Actions:
Some criticized her for not using her current position to implement changes, indicating a lack of faith in her leadership:
"She’s been in office for 4 years—why haven’t we seen any of these policies yet?"These critical comments suggest that while there is a significant amount of support for Harris in the video, there is also a portion of the audience who remain unconvinced about her plans, authenticity, and ability to execute her proposed policies.