stock here: check the full article, but here is AI summary, and below, an expanded commentary.
The comment you provided suggests that the Second World War was orchestrated not primarily by Hitler but by a global financial oligarchy—particularly Anglo-American elites—with the objective of weakening the USSR and reshaping the global order. The claim focuses on the roles of families like the Rockefellers and Morgans, along with figures like Montague Norman (Director of the Bank of England) and Hjalmar Schacht (President of the Reichsbank). These individuals are portrayed as key players in a conspiracy to strengthen Germany’s economy post-World War I through plans like the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan, which injected foreign capital into Germany’s industrial base.
According to this theory, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) played a crucial role in financing the Third Reich, with substantial American and British investments. Many key sectors of German industry, including oil, aviation, and communications, were controlled by American corporations like Standard Oil (Rockefeller) and General Electric. The author argues that Hitler’s rise to power was facilitated by these financial powers, who saw war as an inevitable step to secure their interests, especially against Soviet Russia.
The theory goes on to allege that after Hitler came to power, there was an intentional agreement among global bankers to escalate Germany’s militarization while turning a blind eye to the Treaty of Versailles restrictions. The conclusion suggests that World War II was driven by financial interests, which hoped to rewrite the global order, particularly focusing on economic control and the return of Russia to the capitalist fold. The BIS and its operations during the war, including the handling of Nazi gold, are depicted as further evidence of complicity between Nazi Germany and Anglo-American financial elites.
The overarching narrative implies that the true puppet masters behind World War II were not the Nazis alone but the banking elites of the US and UK, whose control over global finance helped dictate the course of the war.
The expanded version of these comments highlights a deeper and more expansive theory about the origins of World War II, focusing not on the typical historical narrative but on the alleged role of global financial elites—particularly those in the United States and United Kingdom. Here’s a breakdown and expansion on those points:
- Anglo-American Elites as the True Architects of War
The theory suggests that Hitler’s rise and the subsequent militarization of Germany were not accidental but rather orchestrated by influential financial circles, primarily from the US and UK. This theory posits that families like the Rockefellers and Morgans, through their control of financial institutions such as the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, deliberately set the stage for war. Their alleged aim was to destabilize Europe, particularly to weaken the Soviet Union, which at the time was emerging as a formidable socialist power threatening Western capitalist dominance.
The Dawes Plan (1924) and Young Plan (1929) are highlighted as pivotal moments in this process. These plans, initially designed to ease Germany's reparations burden after World War I, also provided a gateway for massive financial investments from American and British capital into Germany's economy. The goal, according to the theory, was not just to stabilize Germany, but to rebuild its industrial base and prepare it for rearmament.
Figures like Montague Norman, the Director of the Bank of England, and Hjalmar Schacht, the President of the Reichsbank, are cited as key players. Norman is seen as a facilitator of this Anglo-American financial agenda, while Schacht is viewed as the architect of Germany's military-industrial revival under Hitler's regime.- The Role of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) The BIS, founded in 1930, is portrayed as a financial conduit for funneling money into Germany’s economy, ostensibly to pay reparations but, in reality, to fund German rearmament. The BIS provided cover for the covert transfer of funds from American and British sources to German companies, which were vital to the war effort.
American corporations, such as Standard Oil (Rockefeller) and General Electric (part of the Morgan financial empire), are described as having significant control over critical sectors of Germany’s war economy, including oil refining, synthetic fuel production, aviation, and communications. By the time Hitler came to power in 1933, the argument goes, most of Germany’s key industries were already dominated by American and British capital. - Facilitating Hitler’s Rise to Power
The theory suggests that Hitler’s ascension to the position of Reich Chancellor in 1933 was carefully planned by these financial elites. Schacht, a critical figure in this narrative, allegedly worked behind the scenes with both German industrialists and foreign bankers to ensure Hitler’s rise. This culminated in a secret meeting of financiers who pressured President Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as chancellor. Once in power, Hitler’s militarization of Germany began with little resistance from the Allies, who, it is argued, turned a blind eye to Germany’s violations of the Treaty of Versailles.
- The Strategic Goal: A War Against the USSR
According to this perspective, the Anglo-American elites were not just interested in rebuilding Germany for its own sake, but to turn Germany into a military machine capable of confronting the Soviet Union. In their view, the USSR, having just completed its first five-year plan in 1932, was rapidly industrializing and emerging as a threat to the capitalist order. The financial backing of Hitler’s regime, particularly by American bankers, is interpreted as part of a larger strategy to provoke a war between Germany and the USSR, thereby weakening both.
- The Outbreak of World War II
As Germany prepared for war, Hitler’s decision to stop paying reparations and violate the Treaty of Versailles was accepted without protest by Britain and the United States, according to this theory. It’s suggested that these powers, seeing the Soviet Union’s growing strength, were willing to support Germany’s military build-up to trigger a war that could serve their geopolitical interests. The Bank for International Settlements continued to function during the war, even handling Nazi gold, which further indicates, according to the theory, the complicity of these financial elites in the Nazi war effort.
- Aftermath and Cover-Up
The theory asserts that in the post-war period, efforts were made by the Anglo-American elites to suppress evidence of their role in funding Nazi Germany. Figures like Hjalmar Schacht, despite being a key figure in Nazi Germany’s economy, were acquitted at the Nuremberg Trials, suggesting a hidden agreement to protect those who had facilitated the war for their own financial interests. The Bank for International Settlements, despite its involvement in wartime financial transactions for Nazi Germany, was never closed down and continued operating after the war, further fueling suspicions of cover-up.
Conclusion:
The overarching narrative suggests that World War II, far from being a war driven solely by Nazi ideology, was largely engineered by global financial elites who saw an opportunity to reshape the global economic order. By funding and supporting Germany’s rearmament, these elites hoped to weaken the Soviet Union and consolidate their control over Europe. The BIS, along with major American and British banks, played a crucial role in this hidden war effort, blurring the lines between enemies and allies during the conflict.
This interpretation points to the continuing influence of financial capital in world affairs, suggesting that behind-the-scenes manipulation by global elites is a recurring theme in modern history.