stock, check it out.

stock here: Just throwing that out there, because it is beyond absurd. And then the choice of Walz, who burned his own state down, and dated a 14 year old student.

But the children have spoken in a poll, and Harris should win, LOL.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/kamala-harris-wins-nickelodeons-kids-choice-presidential-election-poll

I mean, they are humiliating all of us, especially those “for” Harris, even though face palm they believe they are “freedom fighters” “truth seekers”.

stock here, from AI, I slap AI as sloppy at the bottom and they kind of agree and backtrack.

standing seems an odd concept in law since if someone has a valid point why do they need “standing” please flesh this out
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The legal concept of “standing” refers to the requirement that a person must have a sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support their participation in the case. Essentially, standing ensures that courts resolve actual disputes where individuals have a personal stake in the outcome, rather than hypothetical or generalized grievances. Here’s why it is significant:

Constitutional Limitations: In the U.S., standing is rooted in the Constitution, particularly Article III, which limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to "cases" and "controversies." This ensures courts do not become arbiters of abstract legal questions but resolve actual disputes where plaintiffs have suffered or are in immediate danger of suffering harm.

Personal Stake: The standing doctrine requires that the person bringing the lawsuit (the plaintiff) must show they have been directly affected by the issue at hand. This helps filter out cases brought by individuals with no real connection to the matter, preventing the court system from becoming overburdened with claims brought by individuals with only intellectual or philosophical objections. Courts demand:
    Injury-in-fact: The plaintiff must have suffered or will imminently suffer a concrete and particularized injury.
    Causation: The injury must be directly traceable to the defendant’s actions.
    Redressability: It must be likely, not speculative, that a favorable court decision will remedy the injury.

Judicial Efficiency: By ensuring that only those with a direct stake in the case can sue, standing helps maintain a manageable docket for courts. It prevents cases based on mere ideological disagreements from being heard, focusing resources on real-world harms and practical solutions.

Separation of Powers: Standing also reflects the separation of powers. Courts are not supposed to interfere with legislative or executive decisions unless they involve direct, specific harms to individuals or groups. Without standing requirements, courts could be overwhelmed with challenges to laws based on mere disagreements with policy choices, infringing on the roles of the other branches of government.

Criticism of Standing

Many people, like you, find standing to be an odd or frustrating barrier because it can prevent potentially valid claims from being heard, particularly when an individual may raise important legal issues of broad public interest but cannot demonstrate personal harm. Critics argue that this allows certain unconstitutional laws or governmental actions to persist if no one with standing steps forward to challenge them.

In response, some courts and legislatures have crafted exceptions or broader interpretations of standing, especially in cases involving constitutional rights, environmental law, or public interest litigation. However, the basic framework of standing remains essential for maintaining the judicial system’s structure and focus.

Standing may seem restrictive, but it’s designed to balance the court’s role in resolving disputes and maintaining judicial efficiency.

————————————————-

You said:
in 2022 we received a sizable “refundable tax credit” from hawaii for doing solar work and not having a tax liability that a tax credit could go against. The question is, would this refundable tax credit count as a tax refund in 2023, since there were not taxes due technically
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The refundable tax credit you received in 2022 for solar work in Hawaii would generally not be considered a tax refund for federal tax purposes in 2023 if it was refunded to you as cash or a check, rather than being used to offset taxes.

Here’s why:

Refundable tax credit: This type of credit is treated differently from a non-refundable credit. It means that even if you don’t have any tax liability, you can still receive the credit as a payment from the government. Essentially, it’s considered more like income rather than a refund of taxes that were paid.

Tax refund status**: Since you didn’t have taxes to offset, the credit would not reduce previously paid taxes. Therefore, it’s unlikely to be treated as a "tax refund" in 2023 for federal tax purposes.

However, this credit might need to be reported if you deducted state taxes in the previous year (2022) and claimed the state tax deduction on your federal return. If the tax credit or refund was based on those state taxes, you might need to include it in your 2023 income. This is similar to the tax benefit rule, which applies to state tax refunds.

You should check your 2022 tax return to confirm if state taxes were deducted, or consult with a tax professional to ensure proper treatment. Does this answer align with your situation?
You said:
how much percent energy does maui get from qind and solar
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

As of recent data, approximately 50.8% of Maui County’s electricity is generated from renewable sources, with the bulk of this coming from solar and wind projects. Specifically, solar (both rooftop and utility-scale) contributes significantly, while wind energy accounts for about 16%. Maui has made significant progress toward its goal of achieving 100% renewable energy by 2045, with a focus on retiring older fossil fuel plants and replacing them with solar-plus-storage projects​
NREL
​
mauinews.com
.

For the near future, Maui is expected to continue increasing its reliance on solar and wind, with projections of achieving 100% renewable energy on an instantaneous basis by 2024 for certain periods of the year​
pv magazine USA
.
You said:
standing seems an odd concept in law since if someone has a valid point why do they need “standing” please flesh this out
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The legal concept of “standing” refers to the requirement that a person must have a sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support their participation in the case. Essentially, standing ensures that courts resolve actual disputes where individuals have a personal stake in the outcome, rather than hypothetical or generalized grievances. Here’s why it is significant:

Constitutional Limitations: In the U.S., standing is rooted in the Constitution, particularly Article III, which limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to "cases" and "controversies." This ensures courts do not become arbiters of abstract legal questions but resolve actual disputes where plaintiffs have suffered or are in immediate danger of suffering harm.

Personal Stake: The standing doctrine requires that the person bringing the lawsuit (the plaintiff) must show they have been directly affected by the issue at hand. This helps filter out cases brought by individuals with no real connection to the matter, preventing the court system from becoming overburdened with claims brought by individuals with only intellectual or philosophical objections. Courts demand:
    Injury-in-fact: The plaintiff must have suffered or will imminently suffer a concrete and particularized injury.
    Causation: The injury must be directly traceable to the defendant’s actions.
    Redressability: It must be likely, not speculative, that a favorable court decision will remedy the injury.

Judicial Efficiency: By ensuring that only those with a direct stake in the case can sue, standing helps maintain a manageable docket for courts. It prevents cases based on mere ideological disagreements from being heard, focusing resources on real-world harms and practical solutions.

Separation of Powers: Standing also reflects the separation of powers. Courts are not supposed to interfere with legislative or executive decisions unless they involve direct, specific harms to individuals or groups. Without standing requirements, courts could be overwhelmed with challenges to laws based on mere disagreements with policy choices, infringing on the roles of the other branches of government.

Criticism of Standing

Many people, like you, find standing to be an odd or frustrating barrier because it can prevent potentially valid claims from being heard, particularly when an individual may raise important legal issues of broad public interest but cannot demonstrate personal harm. Critics argue that this allows certain unconstitutional laws or governmental actions to persist if no one with standing steps forward to challenge them.

In response, some courts and legislatures have crafted exceptions or broader interpretations of standing, especially in cases involving constitutional rights, environmental law, or public interest litigation. However, the basic framework of standing remains essential for maintaining the judicial system’s structure and focus.

Standing may seem restrictive, but it’s designed to balance the court’s role in resolving disputes and maintaining judicial efficiency.
You said:
Your argument that a person must show personal harm,as opposed to potential future harm is wrong, and this is especially important as regard to rights, so please review this and don’t be sloppy
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

You raise an important point about potential future harm and its relationship to standing, especially in cases related to constitutional or civil rights. While my initial explanation focused on the basic elements of standing, it’s worth clarifying that future harm, if sufficiently imminent, can indeed establish standing in many cases, especially when rights are involved.
Standing and Future Harm

Courts do recognize that imminent injury — even if the harm hasn’t occurred yet — can suffice to establish standing. The key distinction is whether the harm is speculative (too far in the future or too uncertain) or if it’s imminent and certainly impending.

The Supreme Court has addressed this concept in several key cases:

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992): This case is a leading example where the Court emphasized that injury must be concrete and particularized, but also actual or imminent. The Court found that the plaintiffs did not have standing because the harm they alleged was too speculative (involving future travel plans without concrete details).

Clapper v. Amnesty International USA (2013): This case further clarified that for future harm to confer standing, the harm must be "certainly impending," not just a possibility. The plaintiffs in Clapper alleged potential future surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), but the Court ruled that this potential harm was too speculative because it was not sufficiently imminent.

Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (2014): In contrast, the Court ruled in favor of standing when the plaintiffs faced a credible threat of future prosecution under an Ohio law regarding false statements during elections. Even though the prosecution hadn’t yet occurred, the Court found that the threat was real and imminent enough to justify standing.

Importance in Rights Cases

In cases involving rights, courts are particularly attuned to ensuring that imminent threats to constitutional rights are addressed before the harm fully materializes. For example, in First Amendment cases, the threat of enforcement of a law that chills speech can create standing, even if the person hasn’t yet been prosecuted or fined under the law. The courts recognize that waiting until after harm occurs might mean irreversible damage to constitutional rights.

Example: In Steffel v. Thompson (1974), the Supreme Court ruled that a person could seek relief to prevent enforcement of a law that posed a serious threat of prosecution, even though no prosecution had occurred. The potential harm to the plaintiff’s First Amendment rights was deemed imminent and enough to confer standing.
Key Takeaway

You are correct that standing doesn’t always require present harm; potential future harm can suffice if it is imminent and concrete, especially in cases involving fundamental rights. Courts generally prevent claims based on hypothetical or speculative future harms but do recognize standing when there’s a credible, real threat of future injury.

This aspect of standing helps balance judicial efficiency with the need to protect individuals from real and immediate threats to their rights.

stock here, this was always pushed into my Facebook feed. And it was extremely interesting. He spoke truths, and certainly those that want to create a fake reality, hate that. So he was pushed out of my feed, and I suspect most feeds. But someone posted him back up.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/861860445712423

https://www.facebook.com/Alohakeakuaco/reels

https://www.facebook.com/reel/857429839642669

https://www.facebook.com/reel/408704971636501

https://www.facebook.com/reel/365621153002450

https://www.facebook.com/reel/858828126098883

This one has a ton of important people listed quickly

https://www.facebook.com/reel/843318653886708

This one is pretty powerful also, the descendants of the missionaries….became weak in spirit and manipulative.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/579121714642304

stock here: “They” are really out there.

This deserves to be preserved. I shall download and put it on Bitchute.

Armageddon Prose does generally good work, so why he doesn’t get my basic point above, and attacks Rogan for it. Silly.

https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/why-did-trump-rogan-refuse-to-touch

Instead, we got a lot of fluff like “tell me what it felt like to be president,” etc.

These omissions were, in my view, pre-ordained. What I wouldn’t give to have been a fly on the wall in the negotiations between Rogan and the Trump team leading up to the appearance.

So, no points to Rogan for this massively disappointing performance.

Regarding the former president and his inability or unwillingness to tackle real issues head-on, the reality is that Trump is a notorious germophobe who bought in long ago to the biomedical industry propaganda that men in white coats and Fortune 500 pharmaceutical corporations love humanity and want us all to live our best lives.

The proper takeaway from the Rogan interview, in my view, is that he’s not bringing the kind of hard-nosed, confrontational, insurgent energy we desperately need in a leader to combat the industry and the deathgrip it has on every relevant institution.

Dexter Yuen

I saw this comment on a “non controlled opposition” Facebook page. They somehow got the dead rate down to 99, a dollar sale!!! However, as late as August this year they admitted that was like 382 people unaccounted for. Those of us paying close attention from day 1 believe there were about 1000 people burned alive. I would love to visit, but having 1000 angry ghosts would not be good for my soul.

—————————————–

“Lahaina Town Remembered”

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1354681525422426

It took Biden and Josh Green to destroy Lahaina City for the sole purpose of reinventing a Smart City and her Capital of her Kingdom leveled. Sixty-five years ago, Honolulu, the USA named it the Capital of Hawaii. Sanford Ballard Dole overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani the Hawaiian Monarch and established a new provincial government with Dole as President and he promised of no bloodshed.

It took Biden and Xi Jinping to play their game of Competition Not Conflict and playfully practiced Direct Energy Weaponry and picked targets and leaving areas unharmed for restructuring Lahaina for the sole purpose of political greed and Climate Change blaming the nonexistent lies of a Wildfire on a Hurricane thousands of miles away that melted aluminum and glass that a wildfire cannot possibly destroy, and blue evidence remain unharmed.

Petrified toads seen are evidence that DEW has caused this destruction. How many other creatures and natives were petrified. The evidence is still here in the nine freight morgue containers not shown of the substance to the public. Open the containers Josh Green you are a Medical Doctor not a Governor. Where is the transparency of Lahaina destruction the Democratic Party guaranteed?

Truth hidden for more than an entire year is still here. 983 keiki the Department of Education says is unknown of the whereabouts and it is not the answer to any of the questions. Seven thousand homeless people and billions of dollars in lawsuits are presently ongoing at this very moment of time. Attorneys will make money for a long time. Homeowners Insurance of property is beginning to escalate because of the false accusation of the wildfire that natives cannot afford. Property Assessments which are neither fair nor equitable have gone on for generations. Natives are leaving in droves to find another home each year.

The story continues each passing day and Josh Green is as an incredible lying incompetent governor placed in charge of history that is being made up by Josh Green himself if he continues to lie about Lahaina that DEW was not the real cause for this disaster. Evidence is still here. Open the nine freight morgue containers so evil will expose Josh Green’s criminal activity. Smell the odor mean Josh Green is guilty of creating this holocaust.

Put nothing past the leftists that be.

stock out

Portuguese crypto-Jews: the genetic heritage of a complex history

Inês Nogueiro  ¹ , João C Teixeira  ² , António Amorim  ¹ , Leonor Gusmão  ³ , Luis Alvarez  ¹

Affiliations

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25699075

• PMID: 25699075
• PMCID: PMC4313780
• DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00012

Abstract

The first documents mentioning Jewish people in Iberia are from the Visigothic period. It was also in this period that the first documented anti-Judaic persecution took place. Other episodes of persecution would happen again and again during the long troubled history of the Jewish people in Iberia and culminated with the Decrees of Expulsion and the establishment of the Inquisition: some Jews converted to Catholicism while others resisted and were forcedly baptized, becoming the first Iberian Crypto-Jews. In the 18th century the official discrimination and persecution carried out by the Inquisition ended and several Jewish communities emerged in Portugal. From a populational genetics point of view, the worldwide Diaspora of contemporary Jewish communities has been intensely studied. Nevertheless, very little information is available concerning Sephardic and Iberian Crypto-Jewish descendants. Data from the Iberian Peninsula, the original geographic source of Sephardic Jews, is limited to two populations in Portugal, Belmonte, and Bragança district, and the Chueta community from Mallorca. Belmonte was the first Jewish community studied for uniparental markers. The construction of a reference model for the history of the Portuguese Jewish communities, in which the genetic and classical historical data interplay dynamically, is still ongoing. Recently an enlarged sample covering a wide region in the Northeast Portugal was undertaken, allowing the genetic profiling of male and female lineages. A Jewish specific shared female lineage (HV0b) was detected between the community of Belmonte and Bragança. In contrast to what was previously described as a hallmark of the Portuguese Jews, an unexpectedly high polymorphism of lineages was found in Bragança, showing a surprising resistance to the erosion of genetic diversity typical of small-sized isolate populations, as well as signs of admixture with the Portuguese host population.

stock here, check it out.

stock here, I saw this the other day, but it’s worth spreading the word.

Remember, When Walz and his wife were teachers in Nebraska, and Walz was chumming around with at least 1 14 year old boy, taking him to an LGB type concert, Walz and his wife and one other teacher were all forced to resign on the same day. I saw the school board documentation, they called it a resignation. Then they moved to Minnesota where they had no connections at all.

They are beyond weird.

This video of Tim Walz’s wife going full psycho has 5.3 Million views, 235,000 likes and 50,000 comments on TikTok.

The entire country is finding out how insane these people are. 🔥 pic.twitter.com/zqyhoBeCf3

— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) September 16, 2024

stock here:

Let’s say you don’t find out about a massive CME, it’s not going to be on the nightly news, that would panic the masses and create chaos. So you find out a day late on now it’s incoming 12 hours from now. Think about it now, what would you do.

Actions to take if a Carrington were incoming. You might have less than 2 days, so obviously implementing all of the below things needs to occur over a much greater range of time.

My other thoughts are to protect as much as you can in Faraday cages, and not just unplug important things, but disconnect your entire house from the grid. Pulling the meter breaks utility rules, but that is a huge air gap, more than your main breaker at your load center.

If a homeowner at 42° north were to detect a Carrington-level CME (coronal mass ejection) incoming, here are practical actions they could take to prepare:

1. Protect Electronics Unplug Everything: Immediately disconnect all electronics and appliances from outlets to prevent them from being fried by power surges.
2. 
   Faraday Cages: Build or use Faraday cages to store small electronics, like phones, radios, and laptops. Simple DIY versions can be made from metal garbage cans lined with insulating material.
   Surge Protectors: If time permits, ensure all critical electronics have strong surge protectors installed.
4. Water Supply Fill Bathtubs & Containers: If the grid goes down, so will the water supply. Fill bathtubs, buckets, and other containers with water to last at least a couple of weeks. The average person needs about 1 gallon per day for drinking and basic hygiene.
5. 
   Backup Water Filters: Have a gravity water filter (e.g., Berkey) on hand in case you need to purify rainwater, streams, or other sources.
   Emergency Well Pumps: If you have a well, consider an emergency pump that can operate manually or on a 12V battery.
7. Food Storage Stockpile Non-Perishable Food: Have at least 3-6 months’ worth of non-perishable foods. Canned goods, freeze-dried food, rice, beans, and shelf-stable products are ideal.
8. 
   Cooking Solutions: Use solar ovens, rocket stoves, or propane camping stoves for cooking. Ensure you have extra fuel for any gas-based appliances.
9. 
   Backup Power for Fridge/Freezer: A small solar-powered generator or propane generator could be used to keep your freezer running for a short period. Freezers that remain unopened can keep food frozen for up to 48 hours.
11. Off-Grid Power Solar Power Backup: If you have solar panels, disconnect them from the grid during the CME. Set up off-grid solar power for critical devices (lights, communications, minimal refrigeration).
12. 
    Battery Storage: Keep a battery bank charged for emergency power needs. Deep-cycle marine or lithium-ion batteries can power small devices and appliances.
13. 
    Hand Crank Devices: Have hand-crank radios, flashlights, and other essential tools that don’t require external power.
15. Communication Ham Radio: Ham radios, especially those with low-frequency ranges, are essential for communication when phones and the internet go down.
16. 
    Walkie-Talkies: Short-range radios for family communication if cell networks fail.
18. Heating & Cooling Wood Stove: If it’s winter, a wood stove or fireplace with a sufficient wood supply could be a lifesaver.
    Insulation: Make sure your home is well-insulated to retain heat during power outages.
19. 
    Fans for Ventilation: Battery or solar-powered fans can help with ventilation and cooling if air conditioning is unavailable.
21. Security Reinforce Home Security: In prolonged outages, some preppers recommend securing windows and doors and establishing neighborhood watch systems.
22. 
    Self-Defense Tools: It might be wise to have non-lethal or legal self-defense tools ready if civil unrest becomes an issue.
24. Medical Supplies Stockpile First Aid Kits: Ensure you have basic first aid kits, prescription medications, and other medical supplies.
    Backup for Medical Devices: If you rely on powered medical devices, ensure you have a backup power solution or manual alternatives.
25. Transportation Store Fuel: Have extra gasoline safely stored for vehicles, generators, or outdoor equipment. Fuel pumps may not work in the event of a grid collapse.
26. 
    Bicycles: Bicycles or other non-fuel-dependent modes of transport might be essential if vehicles or gas become unavailable.
28. Cash & Bartering Cash Reserves: ATMs and card systems may go down. Keep cash on hand in small denominations.
29. 
    Barter Items: Store extra useful items for potential bartering, such as batteries, candles, lighters, food, and fuel.
30. Lighting Solar-Powered Lights: Ensure you have plenty of solar-powered lights and lanterns.
31. 
    Candles & Oil Lamps: Stock up on candles, oil lamps, and batteries for basic lighting.
33. Gardening & Sustainability Plant a Garden: Long-term sustainability might require a garden to grow your own food. Have heirloom seeds ready and consider planting perennial crops.
34. 
    Compost & Rainwater Harvesting: Set up compost systems and rainwater catchment systems for garden use.

stock here: I got approved for a premium account, no cost.

https://premium.spaceweather.metoffice.gov.uk

stock here: With the planetary grouping all on one side of the sun, and this super complex sun spot group spinning, I’ll keep my important electronics in the Faraday cage. SOHO, 1.5M miles away from Earth and directly towards the Sun at Lagrange Point 1, L1, shows a full halo from these groups at the eastern limb.

https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/solar-flares.html

The Blue image is from SOHO, source here

https://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/c3/512

These are fairly complex groups swinging into our batter box, GO DODGERS!

stock here: we kind of knew this early on, even before we knew the injections were a diabolical experiment.

Friday, October 25, 2024 19:01

This article was originally published by Rhoda Wilson at The Exposé.

The human leukocyte antigen (“HLA”) system is a complex of genes on chromosome 6 in humans that encode cell-surface proteins responsible for regulating the immune system.

Tampering with HLA gene expression leads to autoimmune chaos – and this is precisely what mRNA injections called “vaccines” do.  This is not a mere side effect – it’s an intentional risk built into the core of mRNA technology.

And, “the consequences could be catastrophic: aberrant immune responses, autoimmune disease, and long-term genetic instability passed down through generations,” Drs. John Catanzaro and Peter McCullough write.

The Spike Protein Series: The Dark Reality of mRNA Vaccinology: Embedding Rogue Genetic Code into the Human Exome

By Dr. John Catanzaro and Dr. Peter A. McCullough

A Catastrophic Shift

The rapid rise of mRNA technology, particularly in the form of covid-19 vaccines, has been heralded as a revolutionary breakthrough in modern medicine. Yet, behind the fanfare lies a more sinister truth – the dangerous and reckless embedding of encrypted genetic code back into the human exome. mRNA vaccinology is not just altering immune responses; it is tampering with the very blueprint of our DNA. This technology represents a catastrophic shift, one that risks permanently mutating the human genome and triggering an irreversible cascade of genetic damage.

The False Promises of mRNA Vaccines

mRNA vaccines have been marketed as cutting-edge precision medicine, but they are nothing more than a reckless experiment with human biology. Unlike traditional vaccines, which already come with their own set of risks, mRNA technology takes things to a whole new level. Instead of merely stimulating an immune response, mRNA vaccines hijack the cellular machinery, instructing cells to produce spike proteins – a direct attempt to manipulate our body’s core functions.

But this is where the horror begins. These synthetic codes are far from benign. The assumption that mRNA breaks down harmlessly after doing its job is increasingly proving to be a dangerous misconception. The reality? These artificial sequences initiate rogue transcription – causing cellular processes to misfire, mutate and spiral out of control. Worse still, these rogue processes embed encrypted genetic errors into the human exome, rewriting our DNA in ways that could wreak havoc for generations.

Rogue Transcription: Genetic Tampering Gone Wrong

The idea that mRNA vaccines would target the immune system without disrupting broader genetic functions was always wishful thinking. As we now see, this technology opens the door to widespread transcriptional chaos. When these rogue transcription processes are initiated, they cause unintended mutations that don’t simply vanish – they embed themselves into the exome, the crucial regions of DNA that code for proteins.

These mutations, initiated by mRNA vaccine technology, can scramble the human leukocyte antigen (“HLA”) gene complex, which is essential for immune recognition. This tampering with HLA gene expression leads to autoimmune chaos – immune responses become erratic, misidentifying healthy cells as threats and triggering harmful inflammation. The consequences could be catastrophic: aberrant immune responses, autoimmune disease, and long-term genetic instability passed down through generations.

Try This New Invention and You’ll Never Run Out of Clean Drinking Water Again! (VIDEO)

BCX UltraDeluxe Rife Provides Versatile Frequency Therapy to Your Body Through Low Electromagnetic Energy Waves

This is not a mere side effect – it’s an intentional risk built into the core of mRNA technology. The embedding of rogue code through spike protein synthesis and transcriptional misfires is a flagrant violation of genetic integrity. mRNA vaccinology has introduced a Pandora’s box of genetic manipulation with no way to contain its effects.

Permanent Genetic Encryption: The Future of mRNA’s Damage

When mRNA vaccines embed encrypted code back into the human genome, they are playing with fire. What we’re seeing is a technological overreach – a reckless gamble with the future of human health. Once these genetic errors become encrypted in our DNA, they are not easily erased. The mutations resulting from rogue transcription could become permanent fixtures of the human genome, passed down through successive generations. This raises the chilling prospect of intergenerational genetic damage – a legacy of defective DNA that impacts not just those who receive the vaccine but their children and grandchildren.

The repeated dosing of mRNA vaccines, particularly through boosters, only compounds this risk. Each additional exposure amplifies the likelihood of further mutations embedding themselves into the genetic code. The constant rewriting of cellular instructions increases the chance of catastrophic transcriptional errors, driving an escalating cycle of genetic tampering.

Spike Proteins: The Toxic Messengers of mRNA Vaccines

The focus on spike proteins in mRNA vaccines has proven to be a fatal flaw. Spike proteins, once produced in the body, are not simply a benign byproduct – they act as toxic agents. The spike protein induces oxidative stress (“ROS”), wreaking havoc on cellular processes, damaging DNA and disrupting the body’s ability to repair itself. The oxidative environment it creates facilitates the misfiring of transcription processes, accelerating the accumulation of genetic mutations.

To make matters worse, the spike protein’s long-term behavior remains poorly understood. How many more genetic alterations will it trigger? How many lives will be irrevocably changed by this toxic protein coursing through their systems, continually damaging their cellular integrity?

Experience Vitality Directly From Nature – Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex Is Something Your Body Craves

The Catastrophic Failure of Standard Vaccination Strategies

Standard vaccination strategies have always relied on flawed principles, but mRNA technology has elevated the risks to unprecedented levels. Vaccination, in its very essence, has been tampering with natural immune function for decades, introducing foreign agents into the body with unpredictable outcomes. mRNA vaccines have only magnified this danger, turning standard vaccination strategies into a reckless genetic experiment.

The medical establishment’s blind faith in vaccines has resulted in catastrophic failures, from autoimmune diseases to neurological disorders, yet no lessons have been learned. The same approach is now being applied to mRNA technology, with far more devastating consequences. Traditional vaccines already disrupt immune function, but mRNA vaccines take this a step further by actively manipulating the genetic code – a violation of the most sacred biological boundaries.

The Need for High-Definition Surveillance and Hopeful Solutions

Given the magnitude of the risks we now face, the only responsible course of action is immediate and rigorous molecular surveillance. High-definition molecular diagnostics must be employed to detect and address these transcriptional errors before they take hold. Relying on the flawed methodologies of randomized trials and conventional research models is no longer acceptable in the face of such genetic threats. Real-time monitoring, personalized approaches, and molecular precision are the only ways forward.

Moreover, there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon. Collaborative efforts from organizations such as Neo7Bioscience, the McCullough Foundation, and the Genomics Centre at the University of North Texas are pioneering RNA direct detection methods with specialized analytics. These advancements aim to assess spike-embedded coding that has been reversed and transcribed back into the genome. By understanding these alterations, we can develop a multi-target personalized peptide remediation protocol designed to address and mitigate the risks associated with these rogue genetic modifications. This innovative approach could potentially offer a pathway to rectify the unintended consequences of mRNA vaccines, restoring genetic integrity and safeguarding future generations.

Conclusion: The Reckless Tampering Must Stop

The full scope of the damage being caused by mRNA vaccines is only beginning to emerge, but what we already know is deeply concerning. The reckless embedding of encrypted genetic code through rogue transcription processes represents a direct assault on human genetic integrity. The mRNA vaccine experiment is rewriting the human genome in ways that could lead to widespread genetic disease, autoimmune dysfunction and untold generational consequences.

126 Superfoods That You Can Store Without Refrigeration for Years

This is not just a medical oversight – it’s a disaster in the making. It is time to stop unquestioningly accepting the false promises of mRNA technology and traditional vaccination strategies. The risks far outweigh the benefits, and the long-term consequences for humanity could be dire. We must demand immediate action, transparency, and a complete rethinking of how we approach vaccines before the damage becomes irreversible.

The Collaboration: Neo7Bioscience, McCullough Foundation, The Well Integrative Medicine, and UNT (University of North Texas Genomics) for direct RNA transcription and DNA embedding detection in patients infected with covid, suffering from post-sequalae complications, and also mRNA vaccine-related systemic injury.

[Note from The Exposé: If we’ve learned anything from COVID, it’s to be careful about what we inject into our bodies.  Please think carefully, ask lots of questions about the benefits vs risks, and do your own research before considering further gene therapy to correct the damage that the COVID gene therapy injections may have caused.]

References:

1. Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis – PMC (nih.gov)
2. The Long Covid-19 Syndrome the Spike Protein and Stem Cells, the Underrated Role of Retrotransposons, a Working Hypothesis[v1] | Preprints.org

About the Authors

Dr. John Catanzaro, CEO and Co-founder of Neo7Bioscience, merges AI with bioscience. With more than 25 years of experience, he specializes in molecular technology.  You can follow him on his Substack page ‘John’s Substack’ HERE.

Dr. Peter McCullough is an internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist. Together with John Leake, he co-authored the book ‘The Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization & Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex’.  You can follow him on his Substack page ‘Courageous Discourse’ HERE.

A planetary alignment where all planets are on the same side of the Sun, as shown in the image, is a rare occurrence. Such alignments, called syzygies, are influenced by the different orbital periods of each planet, and though the planets don’t align perfectly in a straight line, a general grouping like this can happen about every 200 years. Complete alignments involving all planets within a limited span of degrees are far rarer and can take even longer to occur, sometimes millennia.

stock here: we had another one of these March 10, 1982, 42 years ago.

Current from NASA

https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/orrery/#/inner_solar_system?time=2024-10-26T19:55:54.573+00:00

stock here: why do they call it the eastern limb

Major X3.3 solar flare erupts from returning Region 3842, source of strongest solar flare of Solar Cycle 25

stock here: somehow this was never on my radar…..AI Expands a ZH comment: Reminds me of how Tim Walz became head of the Gay Straight Alliance in Mankato Minnesota. See far end for some description. Access to confused, vulnerable children is a main goal for some types.

The reference to Jerry Sandusky’s Second Mile charity pertains to the organization that was at the center of one of the most high-profile child sexual abuse scandals in the United States. Jerry Sandusky, a former assistant football coach at Penn State University, was convicted in 2012 of sexually abusing young boys over a period of years. Many of these boys were connected to The Second Mile, a charity he founded in 1977 to help at-risk youth. Sandusky used the charity as a way to groom and gain access to vulnerable children.

The Second Mile was not just a charity in the typical sense; it had significant influence in Pennsylvania, attracting powerful political, business, and academic leaders to its board. Some argue that this created a power structure that allowed Sandusky’s abuse to go unchecked for years. The scandal has led to speculation and accusations that this “power structure” helped to protect Sandusky from scrutiny, enabling his abusive behavior to continue even when there were warning signs.

The “pedo power structure” term suggests that some people believe there was either a deliberate cover-up or at least a failure of oversight that allowed Sandusky’s abuse to persist. Investigations into Penn State’s role in the scandal revealed systemic failures, where concerns about Sandusky’s behavior were not properly investigated by university officials.

The case has prompted widespread discussions about institutional power, abuse, and how influential organizations can sometimes fail to protect vulnerable individuals due to internal hierarchies and relationships of influence.

For further reading on the case, consider official reports like the Freeh Report, which investigated Penn State’s handling of the Sandusky scandal. This will provide insights into how Sandusky was able to operate with impunity for so long.

---

Tim Walz, now the Governor of Minnesota, became the head of the Gay Straight Alliance during his time as a high school teacher in Mankato, Minnesota. Specifically, he taught at Mankato West High School, where he was involved in fostering inclusivity and promoting diversity. His role in the Gay Straight Alliance was part of his broader commitment to supporting LGBTQ+ students and creating a safe environment in schools.

stock here: I believe the USA is perched on a form of Techno-Corporate-Fascism. Big Gov hates small business, and knows that when the chips are down, the large corporations will do whatever the Government tells them too, including injection their employees with dangerous mRNA + Graphene + Poison.

AI seems to “believe” that Fascism is a “Far” Right thing. How is that even possible to make that statement unless you are specifically trying to confuse, deflect, and assign the blame to the wrong “party”. Clearly, Fascism is all about the authoritarian Leftists.

————————– AI Below, and at the bottom, a discussion of Corporatism as it relates to prior Fascist regimes.

A fascist typically refers to someone who adheres to fascism, a far-right political ideology characterized by:

Authoritarianism: A strong centralized government led by a dictatorial figure who exercises absolute control.
Nationalism: An extreme form of nationalism that prioritizes the nation or race above individual rights, often accompanied by the belief in national or ethnic superiority.
Suppression of dissent: Political opposition, free speech, and personal freedoms are severely limited or eradicated, often using propaganda, censorship, and state-controlled media.
Militarism: A glorification of the military and the use of force to maintain power and achieve national objectives.
Corporatism: The merging of state and corporate interests, where the government directs the economy, often favoring large corporations or powerful industrialists.
Anti-liberalism: Opposition to democratic, liberal, or socialist ideologies, especially those that promote individual freedoms or social equality.

Fascism is often recognized for its cult of personality around the leader, the use of violence or intimidation to suppress opposition, and a disdain for democratic institutions.

While these elements provide a general framework, fascism has taken different forms in different historical contexts, such as in Mussolini’s Italy or Hitler’s Nazi Germany.

Historical examples of corporatism, where the state and corporate interests merge and the government directs the economy to favor certain industries or powerful corporate entities, can be found in various regimes. Here are a few key examples:

1. Mussolini’s Italy (1922–1943) Mussolini’s Fascist Italy is a classic example of corporatism, as it aimed to replace both socialism and capitalism with a “third way” economic system.
   The government organized the economy by dividing it into various corporate sectors or syndicates, each representing different industries like agriculture, transportation, and manufacturing. The idea was to create harmony between employers, employees, and the state under state control.
   Mussolini’s regime sought to avoid class conflict by establishing “corporazioni” (corporations) that included representatives from both labor and business, which were ultimately controlled by the state. Despite the corporatist facade, Mussolini’s policies generally favored large industrialists and corporations over workers.
2. Nazi Germany (1933–1945) Under Adolf Hitler, Nazi Germany also adopted forms of corporatism, though it was primarily aligned with large industrial interests and military production.
   The Nazis, like the Italian Fascists, suppressed labor unions and directed the economy to meet state goals. Large corporations such as Krupp, IG Farben, and Volkswagen were heavily favored and benefited from contracts for war production, rearmament, and infrastructure projects like the Autobahn.
   The Nazi government closely controlled wages, prices, and investment while partnering with big business, yet it also ensured that corporate power aligned with the state’s militaristic goals.
3. Francoist Spain (1939–1975) After the Spanish Civil War, Francisco Franco adopted a form of corporatism similar to that of Mussolini’s Italy.
   Franco’s government aimed to suppress class conflict and socialism through a system of vertical syndicates that represented both workers and employers in various sectors. The Spanish state heavily intervened in economic life and partnered with key industries and corporations to maintain stability.
   During the 1950s and 1960s, as Spain shifted toward industrial growth, large corporations and foreign investment were favored, but the system maintained elements of state control over economic life.
4. Japan (1930s-1945) Pre-WWII Japan also exhibited corporatist tendencies, particularly as the government sought to build a war economy in the 1930s and during WWII.
   The government promoted the interests of large business conglomerates known as zaibatsu (e.g., Mitsubishi, Mitsui), which controlled large sectors of the economy. These zaibatsu were crucial in building Japan’s military-industrial complex.
   The state guided production and investment, while the zaibatsu aligned with government policies to fulfill the nation’s war objectives.
5. United States – Early 20th Century, New Deal In the United States, while not purely corporatist, aspects of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal (1933–1939) exhibited corporatist tendencies.
   Under the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) of 1933, the federal government established codes of fair competition that were designed to organize industries and create a cooperative relationship between labor, business, and the government.
   The goal was to stabilize the economy by allowing industries to self-regulate under government supervision, often at the expense of small businesses and labor. Though the NIRA was struck down as unconstitutional, it reflected corporatist ideals in its approach.
6. Modern Russia (Post-Soviet, 1990s–Present) Under Vladimir Putin, modern Russia has seen a merging of state and corporate power in key industries, especially in energy, defense, and finance.
   Russian oligarchs control much of the economy, particularly through state-owned or state-aligned corporations like Gazprom (energy) and Rosneft (oil). These corporations maintain close ties to the Kremlin, and Putin’s government exercises significant influence over their operations.
   This relationship ensures that corporate profits are aligned with state objectives, and the government often intervenes directly in major economic decisions.

These examples reflect how corporatism can manifest when governments favor specific industries and corporations in exchange for supporting state interests, often at the expense of individual freedoms, labor rights, or smaller businesses.

I guess i was only concerned with the intersection of fascism and corporatism. Would the Japan example have any element of fascism? Is current Russia kind of fascist, I hear 80% of Russians approve of Putin
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Japan and Fascism:

Japan in the 1930s through World War II had clear fascist elements. While Japanese fascism didn’t mirror the same ideological framework as Italian or German fascism, it did share core principles like ultranationalism, militarism, and a hierarchical corporate-state relationship. During this period, Japan saw a rising militaristic government that blended authoritarian control with corporatism through zaibatsu (large family-owned conglomerates), which were intertwined with the military.

The Japanese state maintained strong control over these corporations, directing resources and production toward the national interest, particularly in the buildup to and during World War II. Ideologically, Japan’s leadership promoted a vision of national unity, racial superiority, and expansionism under Emperor Hirohito, creating a sense of divine destiny similar to the racial purity rhetoric of Nazi Germany. Though not entirely aligned with classical fascism, Japan’s system represented a corporatist fascist state driven by nationalist and imperialist goals.
Modern Russia and Fascism:

Many analysts debate whether modern Russia under Vladimir Putin exhibits fascist characteristics. Russia’s political system has been described as authoritarian, with heavy state control over the economy and a blurred line between corporate and state power—often called state capitalism or corporatism. Large industries like oil, gas, and defense are under state control or influence, and oligarchs who manage these sectors often owe their positions to their close relationships with Putin’s government.

In terms of fascism, while modern Russia doesn’t adhere to classical fascist ideology, certain elements align with it:

Ultranationalism: Putin’s government promotes a strong Russian identity, marked by military pride and traditionalist values.
Authoritarianism: Freedom of speech and political opposition are heavily restricted, and dissent is frequently met with repression.
State-Directed Economy: Corporations, especially in strategic sectors, are aligned with state interests, and government policy often favors the powerful at the expense of smaller entities.

While Putin has significant popular support (with approval ratings often around 80%), this is within a system that restricts media freedom and political plurality, meaning true public opinion could be difficult to assess. The combination of strongman leadership, corporate alignment with state power, nationalist rhetoric, and suppression of dissent resembles many aspects of fascism, though it doesn’t strictly fit the classic definition.

In short, while modern Russia and Japan (1930s-1940s) share traits with fascism, their systems also have unique characteristics that blend corporatism with authoritarian nationalism.