So I tried to get ChatGPT to actually find each States Election Deadlines, and it crapped out with this fake table. Then I asked it to search specifically for each State one by one, and it only did Alabama of which their deadline is August 15, earlier than the Dem Convention of Aug 19 to 22. Hmmmmm

Certification of Nomination Deadlines for Presidential Candidates in Alabama

For the 2024 presidential election, Alabama has set specific deadlines for the certification of nominations by political parties. Here are the details:

1. Certification Deadline: Political parties must submit their certification of nomination for President and Vice President no later than August 15, 2024. This deadline ensures that the candidates’ names appear on the general election ballot in November.
2. Context: This deadline is crucial because it falls just before the national conventions, ensuring that all necessary paperwork is completed promptly to facilitate ballot preparation.

I found a document from 2020 that already summarized each state, and that is HERE
https://www.nass.org/sites/default/files/surveys/2020-07/research-ballot-access-president-Jan20_0.pdf

Chatty then came up with this:

Alabama: August 15, 2024.

Alaska: September 4, 2024.

Arizona: September 6, 2024.

Arkansas: August 1, 2024.

California: August 9, 2024. {after an hour of research, it was found the real deadline is a soft deadline of August 24th, see below}

“The document provided was from 2020, so it would be disastrous for the dem party to miss the deadline on California, so can you deep dive on California’s deadline for certification? using 2024 laws and regs.” was asked of Chat

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections/general-election-nov-5-2024/key-dates-deadlines

They start off with a Climate Scare:

“If you choose Trump, You will all burn up!!!!”

The summary table for California is vague, what is this notice to candidates 73 days before the election, Aug 24. 73 is rather an odd number too, just saying. SPOILER: It took me an hour, but finally got to the meat of the matter, and California just changed their laws this year and that law allows a “soft deadline” of Aug 24 to submit the candidate, unless the national convention had not occurred, and then that party can just submit all presumptive candidates, like Gaven Newsome, with no deadline to ever submit the final choice. Seriously folks, they just changed the law this year, as if they have AI working on “how can we delay and cheat the most”. The details are in 6901.5 as listed far below.

It is fairly odd that the Republican and Democrat parties are so enshrined within California law as to have separate sections of the law define the requirements for each party. The below applies to a “primary election”, and 88 days before would be August 9th in relation to the Presidential election, just saying.

6340.

(a) The Secretary of State shall place the name of a candidate upon the Republican presidential primary ballot when the Secretary of State has determined that the candidate is generally advocated for or recognized throughout the United States or California as a candidate for the nomination of the Republican Party for President of the United States.

(b) On or before the 88th day preceding a presidential primary election the Secretary of State shall publicly announce and distribute to the news media for publication a list of the candidates the Secretary of State intends to place on the ballot at the following presidential primary election. Following this announcement the Secretary of State may add candidates to the Secretary of State’s selection, but the Secretary of State shall not delete any candidate whose name appears on the announced list.

(Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 149, Sec. 8. (SB 505) Effective July 30, 2019.)

The procedures for the actual Presidential election do not seem to be defined….but they do seem sincere on being available to and and all the minority groups in California. You can “email” them, but not really…you have to use their form, which is a denial of communication due to too lengthy, and no tracking (like if you used your standard email program in which your outgoing email would be preserved). Form is below the contact page.

Chat has now determined that the Certification date must be August 15th because that aligns with the “randomized alphabet drawing for the order of the candidates”, which is still a leap of logic, since they could take the 5 parties that they have separate sections in the code, in order in the code: Democrat, Republican, American Independent Party, Peace and Freedom Party, Green Party. And do the randomized selection, even if one of those parties failed to send in their certification at a later date.

They publish a General Elections calendar, which is detailed, and cites relevant code. This snippet is an example, but it appears to be for the counties, since you would think the Presidential race details would happen at the State level, by the pHD Secretary of State

Here is the calendar link

https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/statewide-elections/2024-primary/section-08-general-election-calendar.pdf

AH!!! Here it is, 8-22-2024 is the real deadline, although it is a “soft” deadline (if the national convention has not yet been held). Aiyaiyai!!!

Cool, they just amended this section in 2024, Jan 1.

https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-elec/division-6/part-2/chapter-1/section-6901-5/

“Added by Stats 2023 ch 72 (SB 437),s 1, eff. 1/1/2024.” Cal. Elec. Code § 6901.5

The “Electors” are important, and there meeting after the election and prior to the “Crowning Ceremony” is where the State’s Electoral College points are issued/appointed. They just changed this law too, allowing for the chance of a “State of Emergency” in which case they can meet in any secret place they want to “Elect the President”. Not fishy at all.

And what is this BS on picking that meeting date….is this intentional to throw off AI attempts at summarizing the dates?

(a) The electors chosen shall assemble at the State Capitol at 2 o’clock in the afternoon on the first Tuesday after the second Wednesday in December next following their election.

OK Here are some other Heavy Hitters in the Electoral College:

California:

• Official Deadline: August 9, 2024.
• Soft Deadline: August 24, 2024.

Texas:

• Deadline: The party’s state chair must deliver the written certification of the names of the party’s nominees for president and vice-president, and the names and residence addresses of the 40 presidential elector candidates to the Secretary of State by 5 p.m. on the 71st day before the presidential election day. This falls around August 26, 2024​ (Texas Secretary of State)​​ (Texas Secretary of State)​.

Florida:

• Deadline: No later than noon on August 24, 2024, the major political party must submit a certified list of the presidential electors who have been selected and sworn to represent the party candidate nominee if the candidate nominee wins the General Election in November​ (Florida Department of State)​​ (MyFloridaElections)​.

Chat say

Deadlines for Presidential Candidate Certification in New York and New Jersey for the 2024 General Election

New York:

1. Certificate of Nomination Deadline: The official deadline for submitting certificates of nomination for President and Vice President in New York is September 12, 2024.
2. Petition Submission Deadline: For independent candidates, the petitions must be submitted by August 2, 2024.
3. General Requirements: Major political parties must also submit a list of their presidential electors by this deadline to ensure proper preparation and inclusion on the general election ballot​ (New York State Board of Elections)​​ (New York State Board of Elections)​​ (Ballotpedia)​.

New Jersey:

1. Certificate of Nomination Deadline: The exact deadline for submitting certificates of nomination for President and Vice President in New Jersey for the 2024 election cycle is July 29, 2024.
2. Petition Submission Deadline: Independent candidates must submit their nominating petitions by July 29, 2024.
3. General Requirements: These deadlines ensure all candidate names are finalized for ballot printing and distribution for the November general election​ (New York State Board of Elections)​​ (Ballotpedia)​​ (New York State Board of Elections)​.

For the most accurate and up-to-date information, please refer to the New York and New Jersey State Board of Elections websites or contact their offices directly.

LOL Jersey does the same BS confusion

stock here: by putting this out there, maybe we can prevent it from happening, LOL publishing their thought crime in advance to preclude the real crime. We will look at FBI Neo-Nazi Bike Gangs and the Entrapment involved in another article, think Mueller.

It was always suspicious to me that the Communists Democrats put their caucus in late August 19 to 22 in Chicago of all places. Noted that the Republicans do their convention in Milwaukee July 15 to 18. This date comes after the deadline for finalizing a candidate in some states, all states have their own rules. It was claimed a week or two back that the Dem convention would therefore miss the Colorado deadline, but Colorado states the party must submit a certificate of nomination 73 days before the election which is August 24, 2024 so it seems that it could work out. I wonder if the law was changed? Or if the earlier reporter had jumped the gun and the shark?

Some states have strict requirements for changing a candidate as the election comes closer, such as in Wisconsin the only reason that a different candidate could be picked is “Death”. Let’s say that Biden doesn’t die, but is so incapacitated that it is clear he cannot serve another term, much less even start another term, that is 10 states, there is NO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE. Talk about the outrage factory….this “right wing neo nazi plot” to destroy our democracy, and it was Trump that made Biden go bad by his continuous insults and jabs at this poor old man….and therefore we need to suspend the constitution until a new government can be formed and have proper elections, maybe in spring time (after you peons have gotten used to Marshall law whilst we release another bio-weapon too).

I hope this is a warning and not providing them a game plan <sarc>

stock here

Home Page

stock here, in her newish video, the clues to an MK-Ultra type of enslavement / satanism are quite clear. Are the forced to occasionally show their truths?

From the link

The video’s first scene is rife with symbolism relating to Monarch programming.

The Sinister Meaning of Taylor Swift’s “Fortnight”

Taylor Swift is in a psych ward-type room and is chained to a bed. Her bed is “floating” in the air, which hints at her dissociative state as an MK slave. Other items in the room are askew or upside down, further conveying the slave’s confused perception of reality due to various techniques, including lots of drugs. Speaking of which, a creepy (upside down) nurse enters the room to give Taylor her dose.

An astute commenter had this to say:

I’m not completely confident that the NWO tyrants will allow elections to take place this November.
I’m very concerned that they’re planning to stage another 911 type event, but far more serious (perhaps a nuclear bomb going off in an American city?).

Or it could be another “pandemic”, but one that is much more lethal. Monkeypox hasn’t exactly worked out for them, but I’m confident they have dozens of other much more serious diseases waiting for deployment, when and if needed.
Carrying out another extremely catastrophic pre-planned event will allow them to instantly declare martial law, “temporarily” suspend the elections… and that will be the end of our freedoms.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they even put a cherry on top by using pre-arranged “assets” that implicate “right wing domestic terrorist groups”, undoubtedly Trump supporters.
I SINCERELY hope I’m wrong, but given that an integral part of the fascist NWO ideology is to massively reduce the number of “useless eaters”, murdering several tens of millions of innocent people to further their agenda isn’t unimaginable.
In their twisted world view it would be considered a benefit, killing two birds with one stone so to speak.
After all, look what they did with covid. They could have never stolen the 2020 election like they did without the almost complete suppression of the old voting system and its replacement with the illegal covid scam version.
If the NWO tools in the democratic party lose big enough in 2024 – and it looks inevitable at this point – it would seriously undermine their efforts to fully take over the country, and then the world.
A rat is the most dangerous when it’s cornered.

stock here, not much down side is you are a reasonable person acting in reasonable ways. Start with this video. My thoughts are that a covert dashcam would be the best option. Perhaps you did make a driving error, and “they” ask for your dash cam footage as “evidence”.

Tyranny is one basic characteristics of some humans. It needs to be not accepted.

You have never studied the law. You’re just revenuers for a corporation operating under statues and codes” F…ing Gold

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

stock here: some comments on YouTube are extremely astute. I don’t remember this one, but I used to write my own Star Trek episodes.

A-Eye

Gene Roddenberry was 100% spot on with his Star Trek episode Season 2 Episode 21 ” Patterns of Force”

The “Star Trek” episode “Patterns of Force” (Season 2, Episode 21) is notable for its provocative storyline, where the crew of the USS Enterprise discovers that a Federation historian, John Gill, has imposed a Nazi-like regime on the planet Ekos. This episode explores the dangerous consequences of attempting to use a fascist system to create order, showcasing how such ideologies can be twisted to justify atrocities and totalitarian control.

Plot Summary

The episode begins with the Enterprise arriving at the planet Ekos to investigate the disappearance of Federation cultural observer John Gill. The crew is shocked to find that Ekos has developed a society mirroring Nazi Germany, complete with swastikas and Nazi-style uniforms. They discover that Gill, attempting to bring order to a chaotic society, modeled Ekos’ government after Nazi Germany, believing it to be the most efficient system. However, his intentions are perverted by his deputy, Melakon, who uses the regime to promote xenophobia and genocide against the neighboring planet, Zeon.

Kirk and Spock infiltrate the regime, eventually finding Gill drugged and used as a puppet by Melakon. With the help of the resistance, they manage to awaken Gill temporarily, who then denounces the regime and cancels the planned genocide before being killed by Melakon. The episode ends with the Ekosians and Zeons beginning to rebuild their societies without the oppressive Nazi influence.

Analysis

The episode is a stark commentary on the allure and danger of authoritarian systems, demonstrating how even well-intentioned actions can lead to horrific outcomes when such ideologies are employed. It also critiques the idea of imposing external governance systems on other cultures, highlighting the ethical breaches and unforeseen consequences of such actions.

Reception

“Patterns of Force” was controversial, especially in Germany, where it was banned from broadcast until 1995 due to its depiction of Nazi symbols and themes. This underscores the sensitive nature of its content and the powerful impact of its anti-fascist message.

Overall, Gene Roddenberry’s vision in this episode was to use science fiction as a lens to critique real-world political and social issues, a hallmark of the “Star Trek” series.

For more detailed information, you can check the episode’s summaries and analyses on sources like Wikipedia and Memory Alpha.

She is not “circling back” she is “stepping back”. KJP has a special place in hell waiting for her.

From comments on Zelensky and Ukraine and Orban Visiting from Hungary.

Another comment, about the US congress. Very few have come out against the clearly dangerous mRNA products, for one point. What are the common aspects of those noted here. Sad that I can only name VERY FEW IN CONGRESS in the United States that I say I have faith in THEIR LOVE OF OUR COUNTRY !! Marjorie TAYLOR GREEN EVEN ROUGH AT TIMES SHE ABSOLUTELY LOVES OUR COUNTRY!! Kat CAMMACK, HARRIET HAGEMAN, THOMAS MASSE CHIP ROY AND MATT GAETZ, RON JOHNSON , JIM JORDAN, COMER, TED CRUZ,JOHN CORNYN ARE THE ONLY ONES I HAVE NO DOUBT THEY LOVE AMERICA!!

ChatGPT

The comment expresses a strong opinion about the perceived patriotism and stance of certain U.S. Congress members, particularly in relation to their positions on various issues, including the controversial mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Let’s break down the key elements and common aspects of the named individuals:

1. Concerns About mRNA Products:
   • The commenter highlights a concern that very few members of Congress have come out against mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which they believe are dangerous.
2. Named Congress Members:
   • The individuals mentioned are Marjorie Taylor Greene, Kat Cammack, Harriet Hageman, Thomas Massie, Chip Roy, Matt Gaetz, Ron Johnson, Jim Jordan, James Comer, Ted Cruz, and John Cornyn.
3. Common Aspects:
   • Political Affiliation: All the named members are Republicans. This suggests that the commenter finds more alignment with their views within the Republican Party.
   • Conservative Stance: These individuals are known for their conservative positions on various issues, including limited government, individual liberties, and a critical stance on certain public health measures and mandates.
   • Outspoken Nature: Many of these members are known for being vocal and outspoken, often taking strong and sometimes controversial stances on issues.
   • Focus on Patriotism: The commenter emphasizes their belief that these members genuinely love America, indicating a perception that these individuals prioritize national interests and traditional values.
4. Specific Individuals and Attributes:
   • Marjorie Taylor Greene: Known for her strong, often controversial positions and vocal support for conservative values.
   • Kat Cammack: A freshman representative known for her conservative viewpoints and advocacy for limited government.
   • Harriet Hageman: A newer political figure, often aligning with conservative principles.
   • Thomas Massie: Known for his libertarian-leaning views and emphasis on individual freedoms.
   • Chip Roy: Vocal about conservative issues and limited government.
   • Matt Gaetz: Known for his strong conservative stance and support for former President Donald Trump.
   • Ron Johnson: Vocal about his skepticism of COVID-19 vaccines and public health mandates.
   • Jim Jordan: Known for his strong conservative views and aggressive questioning in congressional hearings.
   • James Comer: Aligns with conservative principles.
   • Ted Cruz: A prominent conservative senator known for his strict constitutionalist views.
   • John Cornyn: While more moderate compared to some on the list, he is still seen as a strong conservative.

Overall, the common aspects among these individuals include a strong alignment with conservative values, a vocal and sometimes controversial approach to political issues, and a focus on patriotism and love for the country as perceived by the commenter.

Consider wrapping your head around this. The leftists have decided to make an authoritarian push for total control, which is the only way for them to maintain their power and privilege, which if they lose power now, they will not just slink into the dark, but be chased, punished, imprisoned. So they have created the narrative of social justice, the trans “community”, and all the other dividing leftist lies, in order to engage the “feeling” personalities to accept and promote their false causes to create division. These feeling personalities are in large part “the liberals”. Because they operate on empathy and feelings, they accept the lies which have been branded as Woke, to be in stark contrast with MAGA. The perfect setup for easy to hate the other side. But here is my whole point: stop calling them liberals, and go directly to the reality, they are leftist authoritarians and at best liberals who bought the lies of the near total control over media by the leftists

Don’t parse the issue as liberal, go directly to what it is =leftists, whose policies throughout history have always failed, resulting in many societal inefficiencies, including millions of deaths. Those successful in business and media naturally gravitate towards thinking their singular success makes them “right” about most everything, and therefore they know what’s best for everyone else….this becomes authoritarian, and thus leftist.

Look at this smug POS, at first I thought it was Jeff Bezos, LOL

Note, they say nothing about how these 116 Chinese were picked. That is sure odd. Note that 37,000 Chinese were arrested at the southern border, how many more were never detected? Are those the most dangerous ones, it would make sense.

US deports 116 Chinese migrants in first ‘large’ flight in 5 years (msn.com)

Chinese nationals have become the fastest growing group to cross illegally into the US from the southern border. In the first five months of 2024, US officials apprehended 16,270 Chinese nationals along the US-Mexico border, so that is a rate of 39,048 per year in 2024, up from 37,000 in 2023. But the article claims that they have achieved a reduction of 40%. Total lying BS. And if they allowed to fly into Ecuador without a VISA then we should sanction Ecuador.

stock here: this is not a surprising result. Corruption, Inefficiency, Woke Mediocrity, and Inability to See The Truth, all result in higher cost.

Based on a 40-hour work week, that works out to an hourly wage of about $28 in Massachusetts and about $19 in West Virginia needed to cover basic expenses.

The 15 U.S. states with the highest cost of living for single people—No. 1 isn’t California, New York or Hawaii (msn.com)

Here’s a look at the 15 U.S. states with the highest cost of living, based on how much a single person needs to cover basic costs:

1. Massachusetts: $58,009
2. Hawaii: $56,841
3. California: $56,825
4. New York: $55,878
5. Washington: $53,242
6. Colorado: $51,644
7. New Jersey: $51,504
8. Maryland: $51,460
9. Oregon: $50,553
10. Rhode Island: $50,418
11. Connecticut: $50,194
12. Virginia: $49,973
13. New Hampshire: $49,045
14. Arizona: $48,677
15. Georgia: $48,448

Housing is by far the biggest factor in most people’s budgets. At a median of $17,000, housing costs in the 15 most expensive states are nearly double that of the 15 least expensive states.

Like wartime Germany, and various genocides, the leftists will restrict movement, and especially leaving the country. This article, from one of the most corrupt, most leftist publications “Business Insider” indicates an attempted meme. Don’t Leave!!!

from the story (meme: and the traffic really sucks, worse than Chicago)

A retired boomer who moved from the US to Costa Rica said it’s ‘horribly incorrect’ to assume life in Central America is much cheaper (msn.com)

Moving across Costa Rica

When he first moved, he had not been to San José, nor did he know where the touristy areas were. He did some research before moving down, though he said there wasn’t much he could tell about particular areas other than what he could find on Google Maps.

He stayed at a hotel in San Pedro, on the capital’s outskirts, and then looked for an apartment nearby. A few decades ago, the area was predominantly coffee fields, meaning many developments are newer and have plenty of nature. However, he discovered he didn’t want to live there because of the intense rainy season. One day, he recalled it taking an hour to drive 100 yards due to the heavy traffic in the rain.

• Gary Keenan moved from New Mexico to Costa Rica for retirement but found living costs high.
• Keenan expected lower expenses in Costa Rica but faced double the cost for his car and groceries.
• Though many are moving to Latin America for retirement, some are finding living costs expensive.

Gary Keenan, 71, moved from New Mexico to the Central Valley of Costa Rica nine years ago for his retirement after selling his company and finalizing a divorce. Little did he know that a decade later, prices for daily expenses would be often double what he paid in the US.

Fisher Investments

Here is an alternate take, on eating well and living a long healthy life in Costa Rica

I’m from Costa Rica: Here’s what we eat every day for a long, healthy life—it’s our ‘secret to longevity’ (msn.com)

The name “Costa Rica” translates to “Rich Coast” in English. The name was given by Spanish explorers in the early 16th century. The first documented use of the name was by the Spanish conquistador Gil González Dávila in 1522, who, upon arrival, was struck by the perceived wealth of the indigenous people and their lands.

The term “Costa” means “coast,” and “Rica” means “rich” in Spanish. The name reflects the explorers’ initial impression that the region was rich in gold and other resources. This is similar to other places named by the Spanish, such as “Puerto Rico,” which means “Rich Port.”

The name is “Costa Rica” and not “Costa Rico” because in Spanish, “Costa” is a feminine noun, and the adjective “Rica” must agree in gender. Thus, “Rica” is the feminine form of the adjective, aligning with the feminine noun “Costa.” If the noun were masculine, the adjective would be “Rico.”

References:

• Smithsonian Magazine
• Costa Rica Tourism

Check him out, he has been a medium popular blogger for 20 years or more. The comment section is good also.

Things Are Going So Well for Biden That …

https://mishtalk.com/

stock here: so this is the 54th “Pride Parade”???

https://nypost.com/2024/07/01/us-news/multiple-brawls-break-out-at-washington-square-park-during-pride-celebration-video/

Notice that NYP has turned off comments, even if you log in. Nothing to be prideful of here

When their bullshit won’t stand up to the light of day, they censor, defame, lie. Standard leftist tactics…they also get violent and make false accusations.

It looks like we need to put the World Bank on the same list as the ilk of WEF and UN. SDG = Sustainable Development Goals

https://datatopics.worldbank.org/sdgatlas/goal-8-decent-work-and-economic-growth?lang=en

Rachel Notley’s Accomplishments

1. Minimum Wage Increase:

• Action: Notley raised the province’s minimum wage to $15 per hour.
• WEF Objective Comparison: Aligns with the WEF’s goal of addressing income inequality and ensuring fair wages.

2. Child Poverty Reduction:

• Action: Implemented policies that cut child poverty.
• WEF Objective Comparison: Consistent with the WEF’s focus on reducing poverty and improving social welfare systems.

3. Labour Standards Improvement:

• Action: Enhanced labour standards, providing better protections for workers.
• WEF Objective Comparison: Reflects WEF’s commitment to decent work and economic growth (SDG 8).

4. Accessible Child-Care Options:

• Action: Introduced more accessible child-care options.
• WEF Objective Comparison: Supports the WEF’s goals of gender equality (SDG 5) and quality education (SDG 4).

5. Consumer Carbon Tax:

• Action: Introduced a carbon tax aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
• WEF Objective Comparison: Directly aligns with WEF’s focus on combating climate change (SDG 13).

6. Phasing Out Coal-Fired Electricity:

• Action: Began the phase-out of coal-fired electricity in Alberta, transitioning to natural gas.
• WEF Objective Comparison: Supports WEF’s goals for clean energy (SDG 7) and climate action (SDG 13).

7. Gender-Balanced Cabinet:

• Action: Appointed the country’s first gender-balanced cabinet.
• WEF Objective Comparison: Strongly aligns with WEF’s commitment to gender equality and empowering women in leadership roles.

Comparison to WEF Objectives and Goals

Rachel Notley’s tenure as Alberta’s Premier saw significant policy decisions that align closely with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and broader objectives. Here’s how her key accomplishments match up with WEF’s goals:

• Economic Growth and Fair Wages: Her minimum wage increase is a direct effort to address income inequality, which is a key WEF objective.
• Social Welfare and Poverty Reduction: Actions to reduce child poverty and improve child-care options align with WEF’s focus on poverty reduction and ensuring social welfare.
• Labour Rights: Improved labour standards reflect the WEF’s goals of promoting decent work conditions.
• Climate Action: The introduction of a carbon tax and phasing out coal-fired electricity are significant steps toward WEF’s climate action objectives.
• Gender Equality: Appointing a gender-balanced cabinet highlights her commitment to gender equality, a fundamental WEF goal.

Notley’s policies and actions have significantly contributed to aligning Alberta’s provincial objectives with the broader global goals set forth by organizations like the WEF, particularly in areas of economic equality, social welfare, and environmental sustainability.

what is her take on the LGBTQ “movement”ChatGPT

Rachel Notley has been a strong supporter of LGBTQ+ rights throughout her political career. Here are some key points regarding her stance and actions related to the LGBTQ+ movement:

Support for LGBTQ+ Rights

1. Advocacy for LGBTQ+ Inclusivity:
   • Notley has consistently advocated for inclusivity and equal rights for LGBTQ+ individuals. Her government worked to create a more inclusive and accepting environment for all people, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
2. Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs):
   • Notley’s government passed legislation that made it easier for students to establish Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) in schools, and also protected the privacy of students who join these alliances. This legislation was aimed at creating safer and more supportive school environments for LGBTQ+ youth.
3. Human Rights Protections:
   • Under Notley’s leadership, Alberta’s human rights legislation was amended to include explicit protections for gender identity and gender expression. This was a significant step toward ensuring that LGBTQ+ individuals are protected from discrimination in various aspects of life, including employment, housing, and public services.
4. Support for LGBTQ+ Community Events:
   • Notley has been an active participant in LGBTQ+ community events, such as Pride parades, and has used her platform to publicly support LGBTQ+ rights and visibility.

Comparison to WEF Objectives and Goals

Notley’s stance on LGBTQ+ rights aligns with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) goals of promoting inclusivity, diversity, and human rights. The WEF advocates for the protection and inclusion of all marginalized communities, including LGBTQ+ individuals, as part of its broader commitment to social equity and justice.

In summary, Rachel Notley’s support for LGBTQ+ rights is well-aligned with the WEF’s goals of fostering inclusive and equitable societies. Her actions and policies reflect a commitment to ensuring that LGBTQ+ individuals have the same rights and protections as everyone else.

what is the full name of her party and why do they assume the acronymn itself should not be placed at least once in their articleChatGPT

Rachel Notley’s party is the Alberta New Democratic Party (NDP).

The omission of the acronym “NDP” in the article might be an editorial choice for several reasons:

1. Clarity and Readability:
   • The article might aim for clarity by using the full name, especially for readers who might not be familiar with the acronym “NDP.” Using the full name avoids any confusion and ensures that all readers, regardless of their familiarity with political acronyms, understand which party is being discussed.
2. Emphasis on Formality:
   • Some editorial guidelines prefer using the full names of organizations, especially in the first instance, to maintain a formal tone. This is common in journalism to ensure accuracy and formality.
3. Space and Style Considerations:
   • In some cases, the decision might be related to the space and style of the publication. Editors might choose to use full names in certain contexts to fit the style or length requirements of the article.
4. Contextual Importance:
   • The article might be emphasizing the full name to highlight the party’s official title and its political stance clearly, especially in a context where it’s discussing significant political developments or the party’s history.

In general, while acronyms are useful for brevity, using the full name initially or exclusively can provide a clearer and more professional presentation, particularly in a formal news article.

what was tucker saying and doing, is there direct quotes from her re tucker Here the current role of Tucker Carlson is a notable example. I don’t know if you caught the spectre of the former ‘socialist’ Premier of Alberta, Canada, Rachel Notley, proposing that Tucker be barred from entering Canada before he made his scintillating political and ideological scalp taking foray into Alberta some months ago.ChatGPT

Rachel Notley, the former Premier of Alberta, expressed strong opposition to Tucker Carlson, particularly regarding his planned visit to Canada. Here are some direct quotes and actions related to her stance on Tucker Carlson:

Quotes and Actions by Rachel Notley Regarding Tucker Carlson

1. Opposition to Carlson’s Visit:
   • Rachel Notley proposed that Tucker Carlson be barred from entering Canada. She expressed concerns about his influence and the potential for his rhetoric to incite division and hatred.
2. Concerns Over Ideology:
   • Notley has been vocal about her disapproval of Carlson’s political and ideological views, which she believes are harmful and divisive. She has argued that his presence in Alberta could exacerbate existing tensions and promote extremist views.

Context of the Opposition

• Carlson’s Ideological Influence:
  • Tucker Carlson is known for his conservative and often controversial viewpoints, which have been criticized by many for promoting divisive and inflammatory rhetoric. Notley’s opposition is likely rooted in a desire to protect her constituency from what she perceives as harmful and extremist influences.
• Political and Social Climate:
  • The political and social climate in Alberta, as well as in broader Canada, has seen significant debates over issues of free speech, immigration, and social justice. Notley’s stance reflects a broader concern among some political leaders about the impact of highly polarizing figures on public discourse and social cohesion.

Summary of Tucker Carlson’s Role

• Political and Ideological Influence:
  • Tucker Carlson has remained a prominent figure in American conservative media, known for his sharp critiques of liberal policies and politicians. His foray into Alberta was seen as an attempt to extend his ideological influence into Canada, which drew significant pushback from political figures like Rachel Notley.

In summary, Rachel Notley’s strong opposition to Tucker Carlson’s visit to Canada underscores her concerns about his potential to incite division and promote extremist views, reflecting a broader tension between liberal and conservative ideologies in the region.

I see Notley as more of a leftist than a liberal, a liberal would love to have a good debateChatGPT

Rachel Notley is often viewed as a leftist due to her progressive policies and strong advocacy for social justice, labor rights, and environmental initiatives. This perspective contrasts with the classical liberal idea of valuing open debate and dialogue. Here’s a more detailed view of her political stance and how it aligns with leftist ideologies:

Rachel Notley’s Political Stance

1. Progressive Policies:
   • Notley’s government implemented several progressive policies, such as increasing the minimum wage, enhancing labor standards, and introducing a carbon tax. These actions are typical of a leftist agenda, focused on wealth redistribution, worker rights, and environmental protection.
2. Social Justice:
   • She has been a strong advocate for social justice, including measures to reduce child poverty, improve access to child care, and protect LGBTQ+ rights. These initiatives align with leftist principles of equality and social welfare.
3. Environmental Advocacy:
   • Notley’s efforts to phase out coal-fired electricity and her introduction of a carbon tax demonstrate a commitment to combating climate change, a key concern for many left-leaning politicians.

Comparison with Liberal Ideals

• Debate and Dialogue:
  • While classical liberals value open debate and the exchange of ideas, leftists like Notley may prioritize social and economic reforms over engaging in debates with individuals they perceive as promoting harmful or extremist views. This could explain her strong opposition to Tucker Carlson, whom she likely views as a threat to social cohesion and progress.

Conclusion

Rachel Notley’s political actions and policies reflect a strong alignment with leftist ideologies, emphasizing social justice, environmental protection, and economic equality. Her opposition to figures like Tucker Carlson highlights a focus on protecting these values, even at the expense of open debate, which she might see as less productive or potentially harmful given the nature of Carlson’s rhetoric.

stock here: here you go:

stock here, story of my life, also

From Lot’s Wife in Alaska

Over 20 years ago, I selected Fairbanks water fluoridation as a item of interest. My investigations of fluoride’s effects, beyond government claims of tooth caries reduction, opened new questions about its safety and effectiveness. They evolved into a formal campaign to stop it. My commitment to the project was fueled by clarity of purpose. Writing about ‘vaccines’, Midwesterndoctor echoes my experience with fluoridation.

Throughout my life, I have had the experience of being able to clearly see something, and have everyone around me, including a lot of “experts,” insist that what I’m seeing does not exist, and then a few years later have my observation become generally accepted as true.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/is-joe-bidens-brain-vaccine-injured

stock here jackschick knows more than Jack Sh$t

Maybe the iconic example of the
Chinese cultural revolution is more
applicable to these times, leaving aside
the blatant LGBTQ face of protest.
The purging of any Elders, any educated
experienced wisdom is necessary for
their enslavement goals. Of course,
Adolf Schicklgruber was a good Catholic boy.

A-Eye of Sauron Unpacked that comment!

Certainly! Let’s break down and expand on the comment which seems to draw parallels between contemporary events and historical examples, particularly the Chinese Cultural Revolution, and makes some additional statements about purging experienced individuals and Adolf Hitler’s background.

Chinese Cultural Revolution

Background

• Time Period: The Chinese Cultural Revolution took place from 1966 to 1976.
• Initiation: Launched by Mao Zedong, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party, to reassert his control and preserve Communist ideology by removing capitalist, traditional, and cultural elements from Chinese society.

Key Features

• Purging of the “Four Olds”: The campaign targeted “old customs, old culture, old habits, and old ideas.” This often involved the destruction of cultural artifacts and historical sites.
• Targeting Intellectuals: Intellectuals, teachers, and anyone perceived as holding “bourgeois” values were persecuted. Many were publicly humiliated, tortured, sent to labor camps, or killed.
• Youth Involvement: The Red Guards, primarily composed of radicalized youth, were mobilized to carry out the revolution’s goals, often violently.
• Consequences: The Cultural Revolution led to widespread chaos, the destruction of cultural heritage, and the loss of countless lives. It severely disrupted Chinese society and education systems.

Contemporary Parallels

Purging of Experienced Individuals

• Theory: The comment suggests that contemporary movements may be metaphorically similar to the Cultural Revolution in their aim to remove experienced, educated, and wise individuals from positions of influence.
• Purpose: This is seen as a tactic to prevent the dissemination of traditional knowledge and wisdom that could counteract or criticize the new ideologies or policies being promoted.
• Mechanism: The removal of elders and intellectuals could be seen in various contexts, such as attacks on academic freedom, discrediting of experienced professionals, and the promotion of younger, less experienced individuals who are more aligned with the new ideology.

LGBTQ Protest Movements

• Exclusion in Comparison: The comment mentions “leaving aside the blatant LGBTQ face of protest,” indicating that this aspect is not being compared directly to the Cultural Revolution. Instead, the focus is on the broader theme of purging experienced individuals.

Adolf Hitler (Adolf Schicklgruber)

Background

• Name and Early Life: Adolf Hitler was born as Adolf Schicklgruber. His father later changed the family name to Hitler.
• Religious Upbringing: Hitler was baptized and raised as a Catholic. However, his later views and actions diverged significantly from Catholic teachings.

Misleading Statements

• “Good Catholic Boy”: This phrase might be used sarcastically to imply a dissonance between Hitler’s early religious upbringing and his later actions as the leader of Nazi Germany.
• Relevance: The mention of Hitler serves to draw a parallel to historical purges, such as those carried out during the Nazi regime against Jews, intellectuals, political opponents, and other groups deemed undesirable.

Conclusion

Expanded Explanation

1. Cultural Revolution Comparison:
   • The Chinese Cultural Revolution sought to dismantle established structures, ideologies, and individuals that were seen as counter to Communist ideals. This involved violent purges and the removal of experienced and educated individuals, leading to significant social and cultural upheaval.
2. Contemporary Context:
   • The comment suggests that similar tactics might be observed in modern times, where experienced professionals and intellectuals are sidelined or discredited to pave the way for new ideologies. This can be seen in various domains, including politics, academia, and social movements.
   • The comparison implies a deliberate strategy to weaken the influence of traditional wisdom and experience, which could be seen as an obstacle to the implementation of new policies or social changes.
3. Adolf Hitler Reference:
   • Bringing up Hitler serves to underline the severity of purging knowledgeable individuals, drawing a historical parallel to the Nazi regime’s elimination of those who were seen as threats to its ideology and power.
   • This reference also highlights the dangers of allowing radical ideologies to justify the persecution and elimination of dissenting voices.

Implications

• The comparison underscores the importance of preserving diverse perspectives, especially those of experienced and knowledgeable individuals, to maintain a balanced and informed society.
• It also warns against the potential dangers of ideological purges, which can lead to significant societal harm and the loss of valuable cultural and intellectual heritage.