Author: admin

stock here: seen some rants in my day, but never one this long, LOL, enjoy.

I do believe that one of their goals is to remove all dignity of being human.

Un-silentJul 3I have been saying that for years, since the GMO’s were being put out. They want God removed from this planet.

Like (1)ReplyShare

Amy HarlibJul 3Can’t say this often enough! It’s always since the dawn of history, been about using knowledge for power and control by the psycho portion of the human population that learned how to manipulate ‘normies’ to obey them in their power-mad power trips. THEY can’t get rid of the ‘useless eaters’ fast enough! Mistakes were not made, it was always malice aforethought.In these modern times, this evil has become TECHNOCRACY, the vilest threat to the existence of all life on earth since forever!EW! GROSS! HELL NO! https://www.technocracy.newsNOT MY BRAIN/MIND! NOT MY BODY! NO WAY, NO HOW, NOT PLAYING YOUR AI QUANTUM STUPID-ASS VIDEO GAMES! I AM LIVING IN THE REAL WORLD CREATING ART AND PERFORMANCES! The more I learn about this stuff, the more sickened, nauseated and horrified I get, and I wonder what kind of inhuman psychopath loonies make this crap and want to use it!?THIS IS PURE SATANIC EVIL! IT IS MEANT TO DESTROY BILLIONS OF YEARS OF CREATION IN THE ATTEMPT OF TOTAL SLAVERY CONTROL BY POWER-MAD PSYCHOS!I DO NOT COMPLY! NEVER HAVE, NEVER WILL! May more and more wake up and resist and cultivate their health.There is a fate worse than death – I would rather die than be a robotized slave of technocratic overlords! This is my hill to die on!I have a landline and a wired laptop and a wired monitor screen, all the tech anyone should ever want or need. I never had and refuse to ever have one of those infernal mobile devices that are designed to enslave you. My loathing of AI and all things NANO and digital knows no bounds!SCREW THE FEAR FAKERY! NO TRUSTING THE WEF RULING CLASS EVER!Reiterating for the sake of newbies and to support this post.I have no fear of ‘germs’ or ‘viruses’. One of the best places to go for reality: https://virustruth.netI try to live without fear! Fear is the mind-killer!PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGNS BY POWERFUL, WEALTHY CRIMINALS WITH EVIL INTENT CAN CAUSE ALL KINDS OF HAVOC! QUESTION EVERYTHING! And these, the criminals behind the NAC and all the other schemes will use hypochondria hysteria and ‘climate’ hysteria to propagandize the gullible ‘sheeple’ into complying with TOTAL ENSLAVEMENT which is what this is really about! A vast majority of so-called leaders and Public ‘Serpents’ around the world have been bribed, blackmailed/coerced into serving the interests of their technocratic New World Ordure parasite masters and not We the People. GREED is behind every evil assailing us in the world!The demonic despots of Davos at it again! They are behind everything bad! At it for decades and cronies like The Rothschilds and the Black Nobility and The Khazarian Mafia have been plotting planetary domination for centuries! ALL BECAUSE OF AVARICE!We the People must try harder to live by The Golden Rule, doing so would solve most problems!AUTISM TSUNAMI/SADS/TURBO CANCER/BIZARRE TERMINAL ILLNESSES: More tragic victims of the ruling parasite genocidal enslavement agenda, sacrificed on the altar of psychopathic greed and hatred of humanity.CLIMATE CHANGE IS AN EVEN WORSE FRAUD THAN THE PLANSCAMDEMIC! SO-CALLED GREEN TECH IS A GIGANTIC SCAM! MINING AND MANUFACTURING ‘GREEN’ PRODUCTS NEEDS COAL, GAS AND OIL AND MINING RARE MINERALS IS MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY TOXIC AND DESTRUCTIVE THAN LEGACY PRODUCTS. SCREW YOUR DAMNED AGENDA! https://climateviewer.com Migrant/Entrant Invasion/Infrastructure Attacks – all part of the destructive plot to achieve total slavery!Apoplectic livid rage hardly describes the intensity of emotions I have had and am having over what these malignant globalists are perpetrating! There is no noxious crime that the evildoers desiring to lord it over us won’t commit to maintain their stranglehold on power. A groundswell critical mass resistance to their murderous enslavement plans is needed urgently!Creative performing arts, fine arts and literary arts are the best part of being human and the thing the globalist predator technocrat megalomaniac total slavery control freaks most want to destroy. Too many ‘sheeple’ are brainwashed to blindly obey authority figures on the media or in daily life in corrupt system ruled by control freak psychopaths who use propaganda lies to enslave their subjects and they are dumbed down to be obedient by ‘education’ institutions. Fortunately I was raised to question everything. This transcends party lines. We need a system that punishes psychopaths and rewards compassion and sharing, we need a system that actually follows The Constitution in reality. Kudos to Lioness of Judah’s heroic efforts and success in the struggle. We the People must always be aware of the existential threats lurking behind this fight!How I stick my thumb in the eyes of the grotesque billionaire bastards pushing their enslavement agenda and how I embrace being fully human. Fighting the globalist predator technocrat psychopath megalomaniac TOTAL SLAVERY AGENDA one performance at a time!Amazing Amy: Eccentric Yoga Entertainer!As an entertainer, I have been devastated and practically destroyed by the closure of all performance venues and then when they reopened, because MY BODY, MY CHOICE – being made a total untermenschen pariah outcast in NAZI NIGHTMARE LAWLESS ‘SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS’ JAB CROW APARTHEID/DISCRIMINATION/SEGREGATION HELL NYC WHERE THE MAD/DRUNK WITH POWER TYRANT POLS DOUBLE DOWN ON THEIR ILLEGAL MANDATES. I am trapped here with zero financial resources to leave or do anything else about this ‘wish I were dead’ endless misery life has become. The tragic irony is that my SPREAD THE YOGA LOVE performances are all about health, miraculously overcoming age (68) and injury to achieve feats of flexibility few can attain at any age. So BIG PHARMA who wants to addict every person on the planet to their toxic products hate people like me who prove that we do not need them if we eat healthy organic food and exercise daily! https://www.reverbnation.com/artist/amazingamycontortionistuniqueyogadancer I try and live and embody the creative performing artistic world and life I so fervently want existence to be about.They can stick their f*cking damned NANO, Digital IDs, AI, jabs and chips up their asses where the sun don’t shine!All manner of lies and propaganda spew forth from the upper echelons in governments worldwide who are completely intertwined with the global criminal ruling class that wants to commit the worst atrocities imaginable and suffer no consequences. And their corruption slithers down the chain of command creating petty tyrants everywhere.We the People are facing HORRIFYING TECHNOCRATIC PSYCHOPATHY TO DESTROY HUMANITY AND ALL NATURAL LIFE!It was NEVER about health! The Powers That Should Not Be were ALWAYS about they want you DEAD or a SLAVE! This is a painful truth to accept but we the people must wake up and fight back!We must never lose sight of the larger picture of the vile malignance we are fighting against. There is an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth behind all the madness and suffering inflicted on We the People.How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY!RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! DITCH THE DAMNED ‘SMART’ PHONES AND THE DAMNED QR CODES AND GO BACK TO LANDLINES OR FLIP PHONES AND USE CASH AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! INSIST ON CASH! CBDC IS TOTAL SLAVERY! Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos – ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al. There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse – THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of ‘useless eaters’ and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine!APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW!MAKE THE WORLD AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN! NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT MONKEYSHINES! WAKE UP ALREADY!TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW ‘SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS’ FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE.NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL!NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK.

Amy HarlibJul 3Links to reinforce my comments.https://wrenchinthegears.comhttps://www.stopworldcontrol.com/https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.comhttps://pandemicfacts.infohttps://wearehumanwearefree.org/7-days-campaign/https://questioningcovid.comhttps://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1581-james-corbett-breaks-down-the-great-reset/http://www.stopcp.com/GlobalResetPSYOP/GlobalResetPSYOPMindMap.htmlhttps://everydayconcerned.net/2020/09/04/breaking-major-investigative-report-by-association-of-french-reserve-army-officers-finds-covid-19-pandemic-to-have-a-hidden-agenda-for-global-totalitarianism-nanotech-chipping-of-all-5g-irradia/Pam Popper: https://makeamericansfreeagain.comNaomi Wolf: https://dailyclout.iowww.nojabforme.infohttps://www.globalresearch.ca/we-must-awaken-from-corona-coma-reject-great-reset-robotic-technocracy-assert-common-humanity/5745213

Like (1)ReplyShare

This is Planetary Genocide. ARREST this Murderer…and charge him for POSING as a Doctor. “For every disease that we don’t have vaccines…we will try mRNA…as we just need to mess around. There’s a lot of lipid nanoparticles, and some are very self -assembling…” -Bill Gates

This is Planetary Genocide.
ARREST this Murderer…and charge him for POSING as a Doctor.

“For every disease that we don't have vaccines…we will try mRNA…as we just need to mess around. There's a lot of lipid nanoparticles, and some are very self -assembling…” -Bill Gates pic.twitter.com/Nmt9LnEhry

— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) July 8, 2024

Oh the experiment is already showing great success in de-pop.

Jack Ruby: A Deep Dive

stock here: here is a video you should see, in this, he doesn’t say there would be no president Johnson.

https://archive.org/details/jack-ruby-interview

And a death bed interview

https://www.jfk-online.com/rubydeathbed.html

Full Name: Jacob Leon Rubenstein

Born: March 25, 1911, in Chicago, Illinois, USA

Died: January 3, 1967, in Dallas, Texas, USA

Early Life

• Jack Ruby was born to Joseph Rubenstein and Fannie Turek Rutkowski, Jewish immigrants from Poland.
• Ruby had a troubled childhood with a history of truancy, running away from home, and minor criminal activities.
• He moved to Dallas in 1947, where he operated nightclubs and dance halls.

Connection to the Kennedy Assassination

• November 24, 1963: Jack Ruby gained infamy when he shot and killed Lee Harvey Oswald, the accused assassin of President John F. Kennedy, in the basement of the Dallas Police Headquarters. This event was broadcast live on national television.
• Ruby claimed he killed Oswald to spare Jacqueline Kennedy the ordeal of a trial.

Legal Proceedings

• Ruby was convicted of murder on March 14, 1964, and sentenced to death.
• The conviction was overturned on appeal in 1966, and a new trial was ordered, but Ruby died of a pulmonary embolism associated with lung cancer on January 3, 1967, before the retrial could take place.

Notable Statements

Jack Ruby made several statements that have fueled conspiracy theories regarding the Kennedy assassination. One of his most famous quotes is: “The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives.”

Video Evidence

One notable piece of video evidence is a clip where Jack Ruby speaks about his motivations and hints at a larger conspiracy. Here’s a summary of the content from a significant video interview with Ruby:

Video: Jack Ruby being interviewed while in jail, saying something to the effect of, “If the truth ever comes out about Dallas, there would be no President Johnson.”

Context: Ruby’s statements have been interpreted by many as suggesting he was part of a larger conspiracy or that he had knowledge of such a conspiracy. However, Ruby himself often provided inconsistent and confusing accounts, which have left his true motivations and knowledge open to speculation.

Ruby’s Legacy

• Jack Ruby remains a controversial figure in American history, with many conspiracy theories surrounding his actions and motives.
• His killing of Oswald is a key point of interest for those investigating alternative theories about the Kennedy assassination.

Further Resources

For a deeper understanding of Jack Ruby and his involvement in the Kennedy assassination, you might consider the following resources:

• Books: “Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy” by Vincent Bugliosi.
• Documentaries: “The Men Who Killed Kennedy” (a series of documentaries exploring different aspects of the assassination).

Ruby’s life and actions continue to be a subject of intense scrutiny and debate, reflecting the enduring mystery and controversy surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.

wasnt one of his nightclubs really a strip club, and is there any evidence it was also a brothel?ChatGPT

Yes, one of Jack Ruby’s nightclubs, the Carousel Club in Dallas, was known to be a strip club. Here’s a detailed look at the Carousel Club and the allegations surrounding it:

The Carousel Club

Type of Establishment:

• The Carousel Club was a well-known strip club in Dallas, Texas. It featured exotic dancers and catered to a clientele looking for adult entertainment.

Management and Operations:

• Jack Ruby owned and managed the Carousel Club. He was known for being actively involved in the day-to-day operations of the club, often interacting with patrons and performers.

Allegations of Brothel Activity

Rumors and Allegations:

• There have been rumors and allegations that the Carousel Club also operated as a brothel. These allegations suggest that some of the dancers may have been involved in prostitution, either within the club itself or arranged through the club.

Evidence:

• Official Records and Investigations: There is limited concrete evidence to support the claims that the Carousel Club was definitively operating as a brothel. Investigations into Jack Ruby and his businesses did not conclusively prove that prostitution was a formal part of the club’s operations.
• Testimonies and Witness Statements: Some former employees and patrons have made statements hinting at illicit activities, including possible prostitution, occurring at the club. However, these testimonies are often anecdotal and not universally corroborated.

How often in USA does a brother of a deceased brother start an intimate physical relationship with the dead brother’s wife, it seems really rare, are there any examples of thisChatGPT

The situation where a brother of a deceased man starts an intimate physical relationship with the deceased brother’s wife is relatively rare and not commonly documented in the United States. While specific statistics on the prevalence of such relationships are not readily available, this type of relationship is more often discussed in the context of family dynamics, grief, and social norms rather than in formal studies or reports.

Cultural and Historical Context

In some cultures and historical contexts, such relationships have been more common due to social or religious customs. For example:

1. Levirate Marriage: In some traditional societies, there is a custom called levirate marriage, where a man is obligated to marry his brother’s widow if the brother dies. This practice has historical roots in various cultures, including those in ancient Israel, Africa, and parts of Asia, but it is not a common practice in modern Western societies.

Notable Examples and Media Portrayal

There are some anecdotal and high-profile cases, as well as fictional portrayals, where such relationships have occurred:

1. Mary Kay Letourneau: The infamous case of Mary Kay Letourneau involved a complex family dynamic where her relationship with a much younger student eventually led to marriage. Although this is not directly a case of a brother’s widow, it highlights unusual intimate relationships that draw public attention.
2. Jackie Kennedy and Aristotle Onassis: After the assassination of John F. Kennedy, there were rumors and much speculation about her relationships, including with Bobby Kennedy. However, she eventually married Aristotle Onassis.
3. Movies and TV Shows: Fictional portrayals in media sometimes explore these dynamics, such as in soap operas or drama series, where complex family relationships are a common plot device.

Psychological and Social Factors

Several factors can contribute to why such relationships might occur:

1. Shared Grief and Support: Both individuals are experiencing a profound loss and might find comfort in each other’s company. Shared grief can sometimes lead to deeper emotional connections.
2. Familiarity and Trust: The widow and her brother-in-law might already have a close, trusting relationship, making it easier for them to support each other and potentially develop a deeper bond.
3. Loneliness and Companionship: Both individuals may be seeking companionship and emotional support, which can sometimes evolve into a romantic relationship.

Conclusion

While relationships between a deceased man’s brother and his widow are rare in the modern context of the United States, they do occur. These situations often attract attention due to their complexity and the emotional and social dynamics involved. They are more commonly explored in anecdotal accounts, media portrayals, and discussions of family dynamics rather than in formal studies or statistical analyses.

would Levirate Marriage: be common in all the all semitic speaking countriesChatGPT

Levirate marriage, a custom where a man marries his deceased brother’s widow to preserve his brother’s lineage, has historical roots in various cultures, including those of some Semitic-speaking peoples. However, its prevalence and practice vary widely across different regions and periods. Here’s a look at how levirate marriage has been regarded in Semitic-speaking countries:

Historical Context

1. Ancient Israel: Levirate marriage is explicitly mentioned in the Hebrew Bible (Deuteronomy 25:5-10). It was a well-established practice among ancient Israelites, intended to ensure the continuation of the deceased brother’s family line and provide support for the widow.
2. Other Ancient Semitic Cultures: Similar practices were present in other ancient Semitic-speaking cultures, although the specifics could vary. For example, the Code of Hammurabi, which governed ancient Babylon, included provisions that can be seen as related to levirate-type obligations.

Modern Context

The practice of levirate marriage has largely diminished in contemporary Semitic-speaking countries due to changes in legal systems, cultural shifts, and the influence of modern societal norms. Here’s a brief overview of its status in some regions:

1. Israel: In modern Israel, levirate marriage (yibbum) is rare and generally not practiced. Instead, halitzah, a formal ceremony that releases the widow and the brother-in-law from the obligation of levirate marriage, is performed. Israeli law, influenced by Jewish religious authorities, provides for this alternative to avoid the marriage obligation while adhering to traditional values.
2. Arab Countries: In many Arab countries, which are predominantly Semitic-speaking, levirate marriage is not a common practice today. Islamic law, which heavily influences these societies, has specific inheritance and marriage laws that do not emphasize levirate marriage. Instead, widows are provided for through other means, and remarriage is typically a personal choice without the obligation to marry a brother-in-law.
3. Ethiopia: In Ethiopia, which has Semitic-speaking populations (such as Amharic speakers), traditional practices can vary. While levirate marriage might have been practiced historically in some communities, it is not a widespread or legally enforced custom in modern times.

Societal and Legal Changes

Several factors have contributed to the decline of levirate marriage in these regions:

1. Legal Reforms: Modern legal systems in many Semitic-speaking countries do not mandate or support levirate marriage. Civil and religious laws have evolved to offer other forms of social security and support for widows.
2. Cultural Shifts: As societies modernize, traditional practices often change. The roles and rights of women have significantly evolved, leading to a decrease in the acceptance and practice of levirate marriage.
3. Religious Influence: While some religious traditions (like Judaism and certain Christian communities) might still recognize the historical or religious significance of levirate marriage, contemporary practices usually favor other arrangements.

Conclusion

Levirate marriage was historically significant among some Semitic-speaking peoples, particularly in ancient Israel. However, it is not common in modern Semitic-speaking countries due to legal, cultural, and societal changes. Today, the practice is largely a historical or religious concept rather than a common social custom.

what would the talmuc say about Levirate Marriage:ChatGPT

The Talmud, a central text of Rabbinic Judaism, provides extensive commentary and guidelines regarding levirate marriage, known in Hebrew as yibbum. Here is an overview of what the Talmud says about this practice:

Biblical Basis

The concept of levirate marriage is derived from the Hebrew Bible, specifically Deuteronomy 25:5-10, which outlines the duty of a man to marry his deceased brother’s widow if the brother died without leaving children. This practice was intended to ensure the continuation of the deceased brother’s family line and to provide for the widow.

Talmudic Discussion

The Talmud discusses levirate marriage primarily in Tractate Yevamot. Here are some key points:

1. Obligation and Mitzvah: The Talmud emphasizes that levirate marriage is a mitzvah (commandment) and an important duty. However, it also acknowledges the complexities and potential conflicts that can arise from this obligation.
2. Choice of Halitzah: The Talmud provides the option of halitzah, a ceremony that allows the brother-in-law and the widow to formally dissolve the obligation of levirate marriage. Halitzah involves the widow removing the shoe of her brother-in-law and spitting in front of him, symbolizing the renouncement of the levirate bond (Deuteronomy 25:9). This option is significant as it respects individual circumstances and preferences.
3. Conditions and Restrictions: The Talmud outlines specific conditions under which levirate marriage should or should not occur. For instance, if there are multiple brothers, the mitzvah primarily applies to the eldest brother. Additionally, there are discussions about cases where the brother-in-law or the widow might be unwilling or unable to marry.
4. Marriage Dynamics: The Talmud addresses various legal and moral considerations related to the relationship dynamics between the brother-in-law and the widow. This includes discussions on the proper conduct, consent, and mutual respect required in such a marriage.
5. Historical Context: The Talmud reflects the historical and social context of its time, providing insight into how Jewish communities approached the practice of levirate marriage and the associated ethical considerations.

Ethical and Practical Considerations

Rabbinic authorities have debated the practical and ethical aspects of levirate marriage. While recognizing its biblical importance, they also consider the personal and emotional dimensions of such unions. The Talmudic discussions reflect a balance between upholding tradition and addressing the needs and well-being of individuals involved.

Modern Perspective

In contemporary Jewish practice, levirate marriage is rare, and halitzah is more commonly performed. The preference for halitzah over yibbum is based on considerations of personal autonomy, emotional well-being, and changing social norms.

Conclusion

The Talmud provides a comprehensive and nuanced discussion of levirate marriage, recognizing it as a significant mitzvah while also offering the option of halitzah to address practical and ethical concerns. This dual approach reflects the Talmudic tradition of balancing adherence to biblical commandments with sensitivity to individual circumstances and contemporary realities.

Deuteronomy 25:9 more on this pleaseChatGPT

Deuteronomy 25:9 is part of the biblical passage that outlines the procedure for halitzah, the ceremony that releases a widow and her brother-in-law from the obligation of levirate marriage (yibbum). Here’s a closer look at the verse and its context:

The Context of Deuteronomy 25:5-10

The passage in Deuteronomy 25:5-10 provides detailed instructions on levirate marriage and the alternative of halitzah. Here’s the text from the New International Version (NIV):

Deuteronomy 25:5-10: 5. “If brothers are living together and one of them dies without a son, his widow must not marry outside the family. Her husband’s brother shall take her and marry her and fulfill the duty of a brother-in-law to her. 6. The first son she bears shall carry on the name of the dead brother so that his name will not be blotted out from Israel. 7. However, if a man does not want to marry his brother’s wife, she shall go to the elders at the town gate and say, ‘My husband’s brother refuses to carry on his brother’s name in Israel. He will not fulfill the duty of a brother-in-law to me.’ 8. Then the elders of his town shall summon him and talk to him. If he persists in saying, ‘I do not want to marry her,’ 9. his brother’s widow shall go up to him in the presence of the elders, take off one of his sandals, spit in his face and say, ‘This is what is done to the man who will not build up his brother’s family line.’ 10. That man’s line shall be known in Israel as The Family of the Unsandaled.”

Analysis of Deuteronomy 25:9

Verse 9 (NIV): “his brother’s widow shall go up to him in the presence of the elders, take off one of his sandals, spit in his face and say, ‘This is what is done to the man who will not build up his brother’s family line.’”

Key Elements of the Verse:

1. Presence of the Elders: The ceremony takes place in front of the community leaders, signifying the public and communal nature of the act. The elders serve as witnesses and arbiters, ensuring the procedure is followed correctly.
2. Removal of the Sandal: The widow removes a sandal from the brother-in-law’s foot. The sandal removal symbolizes the relinquishing of the brother-in-law’s duty to marry the widow and provide for her and continue the deceased brother’s lineage.
3. Spitting in the Face: Spitting in the face of the brother-in-law is a gesture of shame and public censure. It signifies the community’s disapproval of his refusal to fulfill his familial duty.
4. Declaration: The widow publicly declares the brother-in-law’s refusal to build up his brother’s family line, reinforcing the social and moral obligation that he has failed to meet.

Rabbinic Interpretation and Talmudic Discussion

The Talmud, particularly in Tractate Yevamot, elaborates on the specifics of this ceremony, providing additional details and interpretations:

1. Symbolism and Significance: The removal of the sandal and the spitting act carry deep symbolic meanings. The sandal represents the right to step into the deceased brother’s place, while spitting symbolizes the disgrace of shirking this responsibility.
2. Procedure and Protocols: The Talmud sets forth precise protocols for how the ceremony should be conducted, who should be present, and the exact wording of the declaration, ensuring consistency and clarity in the ritual.
3. Moral and Ethical Considerations: The rabbis discuss the ethical implications of both yibbum and halitzah, weighing the duty to perpetuate the family line against personal autonomy and the emotional well-being of the individuals involved.
4. Preference for Halitzah: Over time, Jewish law and custom have come to favor halitzah over yibbum. This shift reflects a preference for allowing individuals to make personal choices rather than imposing the duty of levirate marriage.

Modern Practice

In contemporary Jewish practice, halitzah is performed rather than levirate marriage, especially among Ashkenazi Jews. The ceremony is still conducted in the presence of a rabbinical court (bet din), maintaining the traditional elements of sandal removal and the declaration, although the act of spitting is often symbolic or omitted.

Conclusion

Deuteronomy 25:9 is a crucial verse in the biblical instruction on levirate marriage and halitzah, outlining the ritual that allows a widow and her brother-in-law to dissolve the obligation of yibbum. The Talmud provides extensive commentary on this practice, ensuring its correct observance and addressing the ethical considerations involved. In modern Judaism, halitzah is the preferred practice, reflecting evolving attitudes towards personal choice and family duty.

stock here: surely there are bank records? Is the entire system protecting the Biden white trash family?

Hunter Biden is accused of influence peddling, especially in ukraine for big fossil fuel companies, using his fathers name to strong arm people into payments. But is that a crime, and is it a crime that could be prosecuted in the USA for something that mostly happened overseas?ChatGPT

Influence peddling, also known as trading in influence, is indeed a criminal offense in many jurisdictions, including the United States. The specifics of whether Hunter Biden’s alleged actions constitute a crime and whether it can be prosecuted in the USA depend on several factors, including the nature of the actions, the laws in place, and the available evidence.

Influence Peddling and U.S. Law

In the United States, influence peddling can be prosecuted under several statutes, including:

1. Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201): This statute makes it illegal to offer, give, receive, or solicit anything of value to influence the actions of a public official. However, the person being influenced must be a public official, and the payment must be for a specific action or inaction.
2. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) (15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq.): The FCPA makes it illegal for U.S. persons and businesses to bribe foreign officials to obtain or retain business. This could potentially apply if Hunter Biden were found to have engaged in bribery of foreign officials.
3. Honest Services Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1346): This statute criminalizes schemes to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services, which can apply to cases involving bribery and kickbacks.

Prosecution for Overseas Activities

Criminal activities that occur overseas can be prosecuted in the United States under certain conditions:

1. Jurisdiction: U.S. courts can have jurisdiction over U.S. citizens and entities committing crimes abroad, especially under laws like the FCPA.
2. Evidence and Cooperation: Successful prosecution often depends on the availability of evidence and the cooperation of foreign governments in providing evidence and extraditing suspects if necessary.

Challenges in Prosecution

1. Evidence Collection: Gathering sufficient evidence for prosecution can be challenging, especially when the alleged crimes occurred overseas.
2. Political and Diplomatic Considerations: High-profile cases involving politically connected individuals can be complicated by political and diplomatic factors.
3. Statute of Limitations: There are time limits within which charges must be brought. Delays in investigation can affect the ability to prosecute.

Current Status

As of now, there have been investigations into Hunter Biden’s business dealings, including his work in Ukraine. However, proving influence peddling or other related crimes requires substantial evidence showing that illegal actions were taken. These investigations are complex and ongoing, with legal and political implications.

In summary, while influence peddling is a crime in the United States and can be prosecuted even if the actions occurred overseas, the specifics of Hunter Biden’s case involve a detailed and complex legal analysis, requiring thorough investigation and substantial evidence to support any charges.

You missed the part about “loans” that were never paid back and never meant to be paid back, also he was on the board of directors of Burisma getting $1M a year, is there any evidence that he even attended a single board meeting? What were they getting in return?ChatGPT

The allegations surrounding Hunter Biden’s business dealings, particularly with Burisma Holdings, have raised significant questions about potential influence peddling and financial misconduct. Here are some key points addressing your concerns about loans, board meetings, and what Burisma might have been getting in return:

Loans and Financial Transactions

Allegations of Loans: There have been reports and allegations that Hunter Biden received substantial sums of money, possibly framed as loans that were never intended to be repaid. Such transactions, if proven, could suggest attempts to disguise bribery or improper financial gains.

Burisma Board Membership

Burisma Holdings: Hunter Biden was indeed a board member of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas company, reportedly earning around $1 million per year for his role.

Board Meeting Attendance: There is limited publicly available evidence regarding Hunter Biden’s attendance at Burisma board meetings. While board members typically attend meetings to fulfill their duties, the extent of Hunter Biden’s involvement and his attendance at meetings have been questioned.

Potential Returns for Burisma

Influence and Connections: The primary benefit Burisma might have sought from Hunter Biden’s involvement could be his connection to his father, Joe Biden, who was Vice President of the United States at the time. This connection could provide Burisma with potential influence, access, or protection, particularly given the ongoing scrutiny and investigations into the company.

Legal and Political Protection: It is alleged that Burisma sought to leverage Hunter Biden’s position to secure a favorable political and legal environment. This includes potential influence over investigations and regulatory actions by Ukrainian authorities and fostering a positive image or relationship with U.S. officials.

Legal Implications

Proving Influence Peddling: To prosecute such a case, it would be necessary to demonstrate that payments to Hunter Biden were explicitly intended to influence his father’s actions or policies as Vice President. This requires substantial evidence of a quid pro quo arrangement, showing a direct link between the payments and specific actions taken by Joe Biden in his official capacity.

Loans and Financial Impropriety: If loans were given with no intention of repayment, it could constitute financial fraud or other related crimes. Proving this would require detailed financial records and evidence demonstrating the nature and intent of these transactions.

Current Investigations and Evidence

There have been various investigations into Hunter Biden’s business dealings, including:

1. Senate Report: A 2020 Senate report highlighted concerns about Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma and potential conflicts of interest but did not provide conclusive evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
2. Department of Justice Investigations: The DOJ has ongoing investigations into Hunter Biden’s taxes and foreign business dealings. The outcomes of these investigations will be crucial in determining whether any criminal charges are warranted.
3. Public and Political Scrutiny: Hunter Biden’s activities continue to be a focal point of political debate, and any new evidence could significantly impact public perception and legal actions.

Conclusion

While there are serious allegations regarding Hunter Biden’s business activities, loans, and his role at Burisma, proving criminal conduct requires thorough investigation and concrete evidence. The existing investigations by various authorities will need to uncover and present this evidence to support any potential prosecution.

What about him selling pretty crappy art for $500000 a pop, seems super suspect ChatGPT

The sale of Hunter Biden’s artwork for substantial sums has indeed raised questions and suspicions about potential influence peddling and ethical concerns. Here’s a breakdown of the key issues:

Art Sales and Ethical Concerns

High Prices for Art: Hunter Biden has sold his artwork for prices reaching up to $500,000 per piece. Critics argue that the high prices for his art, given his relatively new status as an artist, are disproportionate and suggest that buyers might be seeking to gain favor or influence through these purchases.

Potential for Influence Peddling: The concern is that individuals or entities might purchase Hunter Biden’s art at inflated prices to gain access to or curry favor with his father, President Joe Biden. This raises ethical questions about the potential for influence peddling through art sales.

Measures to Address Concerns

Anonymous Buyers: To mitigate concerns, the Biden administration has stated that buyers of Hunter Biden’s art would remain anonymous, preventing Hunter Biden and the public from knowing who purchased the art. The idea is to avoid any potential conflicts of interest or influence.

Ethical Guidelines: The White House has outlined ethical guidelines for the sale of Hunter Biden’s art to ensure transparency and prevent any perception of impropriety. These guidelines include keeping the identities of buyers confidential and not involving the President or any administration officials in the sales process.

Criticism and Concerns

Transparency Issues: Critics argue that the measures taken are insufficient to address the core issues. Keeping buyers anonymous does not fully eliminate the risk that someone could still attempt to use the art sales to gain influence.

Market Value and Artistic Merit: Questions about the true market value of Hunter Biden’s art persist, given his lack of an established reputation in the art world. The prices paid for his work far exceed what is typical for emerging artists, leading to suspicions about the motives of the buyers.

Legal and Ethical Implications

Legal Aspects: Selling art at high prices is not inherently illegal. However, if it can be proven that the sales are being used explicitly for influence peddling or as a form of bribery, legal actions could be considered. This would require evidence showing a direct connection between the art sales and specific favors or actions taken by President Joe Biden or his administration.

Ethical Considerations: Even if no laws are broken, the situation raises significant ethical concerns about the appearance of impropriety and the potential for conflicts of interest. Public officials and their families are typically held to high ethical standards to maintain trust in public institutions.

Conclusion

While the sale of Hunter Biden’s art for substantial sums raises valid ethical concerns and suspicions about potential influence peddling, proving criminal activity requires concrete evidence of a quid pro quo arrangement or direct link to specific actions taken by the President or his administration. The measures taken to ensure buyer anonymity aim to address some of these concerns, but questions about transparency and the true market value of the art remain contentious issues.

He says “The rise of anti-Semitism is a sign of a society in decline”

stock say “The rise of Zionism is a sign of a society being collapsed”

Check the comment section,

More from this Zionist POS, and a Genociding Turk on the other side, LOL

stock here: This is from Eric West, the now famous realtor who documented in 4k video, the day after the Maui Massacre, via dirt bike and drone. I don’t understand the program yet, but the idea is to buy products from real people, with a portion going to help Lahaina.

https://switchforlahaina.com

This is Eric! Yesssahhhhh!

I’m somewhere over the rainbow that you agree with me on this!! it’s time to stop feeding these big conglomerates our hard-earned cash and start supporting family-owned, made-in-America businesses. Plus, we get to help out local Lahaina families in the process.

Thank you for trusting me enough to consider making the switch for Lahaina.

Your decision packs more punch than you might think. By simply changing where you buy your toothpaste, soap, laundry detergent, and over 300 other daily essentials, you’re providing crucial economic support to the fire survivors in Lahaina and others on Maui that were affected financially (ie lost a West side job, etc). By switching, you’ll be giving them meaningful work and helping them rebuild their lives and communities for the long haul.

One of my friends will be assigned to assist you in this transition. You’ll get to chat with someone directly affected by the Lahaina fire or someone who’s working to support them.

After making the switch ourselves, we’ve become incredibly passionate about this cause. Plus, many of the products have become our all-time favorites. Personally, I’m head-over-heels for the beef—don’t forget to ask about it!

So, what’s next? Expect a call or text to schedule a time to fill you in on the details.

Do me one favor… Be kind to them.

These aren’t call center employees. They’re real people lending a helping hand, juggling their schedules and families to make this work. If you can’t make it for any reason, please let them know or use the reschedule link in the emails to pick a new time so they can help someone else.

Thank you again for joining this important movement.

Mahalo,

Eric West

P.S. Once you make the switch, I’ll personally send you a thank-you card and a silicone bracelet that says PRAY and SwitchForLahaina.com. My hope is that this bracelet will remind you to passionately and frequently share the “Switch for Lahaina” program with everyone you meet. And, of course, to continue praying for the people of the Lahaina community for ongoing protection, emotional support, and economic prosperity. 🤙

Romans 8:28: “And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose.”

stock here, apparently they have more resources than I do. LOL

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13593099/cut-dates-democrat-candidates-running-office-replace-joe-biden.html

I have not vetted their dates, this would take like 30 hours. But only a handful are before the end of the Dem Convention, and most of those are clearly red. Just trying to be honest here, it doesn’t look like a huge problem, unless they can’t decide at the convention.

stock here:

WEF : Klaus Schwab ‘We Must Force’ Humanity into ‘Collaboration’ pic.twitter.com/rarcBvBc2i

— Marcus Cottus (@cottusmarcus) June 26, 2024

https://www.axios.com/2024/07/05/keir-starmer-election-uk-prime-minister

stock here: Enjoy, somewhat annoying narrator, but still of interest. I wonder who that alien faced guy at the beginning is, or just created?

stock here: I am quite surprised this is open source.

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf

stock: They are also tasked with talking to citizens that are eligible to vote but not registered and helping to get them registered, aka Ballot Harvesting. Their Budget is $1.05 M per year.

Blue (Democratic-leaning) States:

1. David Maeda – Minnesota
2. Jonathan Brater – Michigan
3. Stuart Holmes – Washington State
4. Mandy Vigil – New Mexico
5. Colleen Connor – Arizona (recently more competitive but leaning Democratic in recent elections)
6. Kristin Sullivan – Connecticut
7. Anthony Albence – Delaware
8. Bernadette Matthews – Illinois
9. Jennifer Scutchfield – Kentucky (historically red but sometimes swings Democratic in state elections)
10. Melissa Packard – Maine (leans Democratic but has a history of being a swing state)
11. Jared DeMarinis – Maryland
12. Michelle Tassinari – Massachusetts
13. Brittany Giampola – New Jersey
14. Molly Woon – Oregon
15. Kathy Placencia – Rhode Island
16. Howard Knapp – South Carolina (traditionally red, but included due to some competitive local dynamics)
17. Seán Sheehan – Vermont
18. Monica Evans – Washington D.C. (strongly Democratic)
19. Meagan Wolfe – Wisconsin (swing state but leaning Democratic recently)
20. Blake Evans – Georgia (swing state, recently leaning Democratic but traditionally Republican)
21. Judd Choate – Colorado (historically a swing state but recently leaning Democratic)
22. Mark Wlaschin – Nevada (swing state but leaning Democratic recently)
23. Howard Knapp — South Carolina

Red (Republican-leaning) States:

2. Ryan Cowley – Utah
3. Carol Beecher – Alaska

Blake Evans, the chair is a Hispanic and a Baptist

Contact Information

2 MLK Jr. Dr. S.E. 
STE 802, Floyd W. Tower 
Atlanta, GA 30334 

Office Number: 404-656-2871
Fax Number: 404-463-5231

Email: elections@sos.ga.gov 

Contacts

Blake Evans, Director

Michael Barnes, Deputy Director of Election and Voting Systems

Dr. Jesse A. Harris, Deputy Director of Administration and Election Support Services

—————————————-

stock here: this stinks to high heaven. The Board of Directors are the State Elections Board from 23 Blue States and 2 Red States!

The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. The latest available financial data for ERIC can be found in its Form 990 filings. Here are some key points from the most recent filings:

1. Revenue and Expenses:
   • ERIC’s total revenue was approximately $1,059,625.
   • The total expenses were around $1,046,409.
   • The organization reported net assets of about $662,033.
2. Compensation:
   • The Executive Director received a compensation of $115,200.
   • Other salaries and wages accounted for $97,250.
3. Governance:
   • The organization’s financial filings list key employees and directors, but there is no recorded compensation for most board members, indicating that they likely serve in a volunteer capacity.
4. Program Services:
   • ERIC’s primary mission is to improve the accuracy of voter registration lists and to educate eligible citizens on how to register to vote. This includes identifying inaccurate or out-of-date voter registration records and contacting potentially eligible but unregistered residents to increase voter participation.

For detailed financial information and access to the full Form 990 documents, you can visit ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer or GuideStar:

• ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
• GuideStar Profile for ERIC

These sources provide comprehensive data on ERIC’s financials, governance, and program activities.

stock here, here is the skinny. Expect last minute changes in dirty blue areas to make their cheating “more legal”. One interviewee on the street in Milwaukee stated “I think people should be able to vote anyway they want too” just effing brilliant!

Wisconsin is probably the most important State in terms of the next Presidential Election.

In July 2022, the state Supreme Court, then under a conservative majority, held that absentee ballot drop boxes, which were used widely during the 2020 election, were not authorized under state statute and, therefore, the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) guidance encouraging their use was unlawful.

This is the law. Similar to the Chevron case RE Fishing on the East Coast, regulators just cannot make stuff up and then enforce it as law. In that case, among other injustices, they wanted boat operators to pay for the costs of observers on every boat every day they were out of harbor, and to provide them all the essentials of life, including safety.

Here is the lie called out in plain site, in yellow. They are creating a definition, and one that would be astronomically odds against being able to achieve in practice. How would one person do all this? Or does the Municipal Clerk get to delegate his obligation to others, maybe paid by Zuckerberg or Soros?

What are some possible actions? chat

State Supreme Court justices can face various forms of accountability if their actions are deemed to go against the law as written. Here are some mechanisms by which they can be censored, punished, or have their rulings quashed:

1. Judicial Review and Higher Courts

• Appeals to Higher Courts: If a state Supreme Court’s decision is perceived as unlawful, it can sometimes be appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which has the authority to overturn state Supreme Court decisions if they violate federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
• Rehearing Requests: Parties involved in a case can request a rehearing if there is a belief that the court’s decision was based on a misunderstanding or misapplication of the law.

2. Legislative and Executive Oversight

• Impeachment: State legislators can impeach justices for misconduct, including gross dereliction of duty or violations of rights. The impeachment process typically involves charges brought by the lower house of the state legislature and a trial in the upper house.
• Removal by Governor: In some states, the governor has the authority to remove justices for cause, subject to legislative approval or specific procedures outlined in state law.

3. Judicial Discipline Commissions

• Judicial Conduct Boards: Most states have judicial conduct boards or commissions that investigate complaints against judges, including state Supreme Court justices. These bodies can recommend disciplinary actions ranging from censure to removal from office.
• Ethical Violations: Justices can be disciplined for ethical violations, such as conflict of interest, bias, or failure to follow established legal standards.

4. Public Accountability

• Retention Elections: In some states, justices face retention elections where the public votes on whether they should remain in office. A controversial or unlawful ruling can influence the public to vote against a justice’s retention.
• Public Pressure and Advocacy: Public opinion and advocacy groups can exert pressure on justices through media campaigns and public demonstrations, potentially leading to legislative action or influencing judicial conduct bodies.

5. Civil and Criminal Liabilities

• 18 U.S.C. § 242: This federal statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law to willfully deprive someone of their rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. If a state Supreme Court justice’s actions are found to violate this statute, they could face criminal charges. However, proving such violations in the context of judicial decisions is complex and rare.

6. Quashing Unlawful Rulings

• Federal Court Intervention: If a state Supreme Court ruling is unconstitutional or violates federal law, federal courts can issue orders to quash or overturn the ruling.
• State Constitutional Amendments: State legislatures can amend the state constitution to override judicial interpretations and clarify legal standards, effectively quashing the impact of specific rulings.

Examples

• Pennsylvania Supreme Court Impeachment: In 1994, Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Rolf Larsen was impeached and removed from office for actions that included improper conduct and misuse of prescription drugs.
• California Supreme Court Recall: In 1986, three justices of the California Supreme Court, including Chief Justice Rose Bird, were not retained in a public vote primarily due to their controversial rulings on the death penalty.

Conclusion

State Supreme Court justices are subject to various checks and balances that can hold them accountable for unlawful actions. These mechanisms ensure that no judicial body operates entirely without oversight or potential consequences for misconduct.

stock here: I got the article summary from Chat, as the article itself kind of rambled about. Orig Substack

https://miri.substack.com/p/putting-the-no-in-hypnosis

Article Summary

The article discusses the use of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) and hypnosis tactics during the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests that similar techniques are being used to discourage voting in upcoming elections. The author and NLP trainer, Debbie Williams, describes how repetitive phrases and fear-inducing messages were used during the pandemic to manipulate public behavior. She expresses concern that similar methods are now being employed to dissuade dissidents from voting, thereby maintaining the status quo and benefiting the global elite.

Specific NLP Tactics Identified

1. Repetitive Phrases and Mantras: Phrases like “Trust the science,” “Protect the NHS,” and “Don’t kill granny” were repeated frequently to create compliance through subconscious conditioning.
2. Fear Induction: Continuous fear-mongering was used to place the population in a trance-like state, making them more susceptible to suggestions.
3. Confusion and Amnesia: Confusing messages and mixed signals were used to induce a trance and create amnesia, making people forget initial doubts and follow imposed behaviors.
4. Post-Hypnotic Suggestions: Phrases like “The new normal” were used to embed new behaviors and thoughts that felt natural and self-originated.
5. Learned Helplessness: Similar to the Milgram experiment and rat experiments, constant stress and fear led to a state where people felt their actions were futile, reinforcing compliance and inaction.
6. Soundbites and Memes: Simple, repeatable phrases like “It’s all rigged” and “I do not consent” are used to create a sense of hopelessness and apathy towards voting.

Key Points and Concerns

• COVID-19 Manipulation: The government’s “nudge unit” and the Behavioral Insights Team (BIT) used NLP to enforce compliance with COVID-19 measures.
• Current Use Against Voting: There is a concern that similar NLP tactics are now being used to convince dissidents not to vote, ensuring the continuation of the current political agenda.
• Propaganda Techniques: The article points out how slogans, fear, and confusion are strategically used to influence behavior and suppress dissent.
• Call to Action: Williams urges readers to recognize these manipulative tactics and to research and vote for candidates who align with their values, rather than abstaining from voting out of cynicism or hopelessness.

The article ultimately calls for awareness of these psychological manipulations and encourages active participation in elections to counteract the potential undermining of democratic processes through NLP and hypnosis tactics.

Yes, the term “Chosen” (also spelled “Chosun” or “Joseon”) can be sensitive in a Korean context. It historically refers to the Joseon Dynasty, which ruled Korea from 1392 to 1897. However, during the Japanese occupation of Korea (1910-1945), “Chosen” was used by the Japanese to refer to Korea, and it carries negative connotations for many Koreans because of the oppression and hardships experienced during that period.

Using “Chosen” in certain contexts, especially in reference to Korean people or culture, can be seen as a slur or offensive due to its association with the colonial period and the suffering under Japanese rule.

——————————————————————-

So did the surrender of Japan to USA on that carrier coincide with Japan relinquishing control over Korea, was that part of the dealChatGPT

Yes, the surrender of Japan to the United States on September 2, 1945, aboard the USS Missouri marked the end of World War II and Japan’s relinquishment of control over Korea. The formal surrender also signified the end of Japanese colonial rule in Korea, which had lasted from 1910 to 1945.

Following Japan’s surrender, Korea was liberated from Japanese occupation. However, the country was subsequently divided along the 38th parallel into two zones of occupation: the Soviet Union occupied the north, and the United States occupied the south. This division eventually led to the establishment of two separate Korean states in 1948: the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) and the Republic of Korea (South Korea).

how long did USA occupying south Korea, and why did we give half to Russia, or maybe it wasn’t a give, but a strong arm maneuver by Russia

ChatGPT

The United States occupied South Korea from 1945 until the establishment of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) on August 15, 1948. The division of Korea along the 38th parallel was not a straightforward “giving” of territory to the Soviet Union but rather a strategic decision influenced by the circumstances at the end of World War II and the emerging Cold War tensions between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.

Here are the key points regarding the division and occupation:

1. Division at the 38th Parallel:
   • The division was initially proposed by the United States as a temporary measure to facilitate the surrender of Japanese forces in Korea. On August 10, 1945, two young U.S. Army officers, Dean Rusk and Charles Bonesteel, hastily drew the line at the 38th parallel, partly because it was easily identifiable and roughly divided the peninsula into two equal parts.
   • The Soviet Union accepted the division, and both sides agreed to supervise the disarmament of Japanese forces in their respective zones.
2. Soviet Occupation in the North:
   • The Soviet Union quickly moved into the northern part of Korea, establishing a communist government. This was part of their broader strategy to expand their influence in East Asia and counterbalance U.S. presence in the region.
3. U.S. Occupation in the South:
   • The U.S. occupied the southern part of Korea and aimed to establish a non-communist government. The U.S. military government faced significant challenges, including political unrest and economic difficulties.
4. Emerging Cold War Tensions:
   • The division of Korea soon reflected the larger geopolitical struggle between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Each superpower supported the development of ideologically aligned governments in their respective zones.
   • Efforts to unify Korea under a single government failed due to the conflicting interests of the U.S. and the Soviet Union, as well as internal Korean political divisions.
5. Formation of Separate States:
   • In 1948, the Republic of Korea (South Korea) was established in the south with the support of the United States, and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) was established in the north with the support of the Soviet Union.

The division of Korea and the subsequent establishment of separate governments marked the beginning of the Korean conflict, which eventually led to the Korean War in 1950. The division was more a product of Cold War geopolitics and power struggles than a simple transfer or “giving” of territory.

when were the nuke bombs dropped on japanChatGPT

The nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan in August 1945:

1. Hiroshima: The first bomb, named “Little Boy,” was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945.
2. Nagasaki: The second bomb, named “Fat Man,” was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945.

These bombings were pivotal events leading to Japan’s surrender and the end of World War II. Japan formally surrendered on September 2, 1945, aboard the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay.

stock here, here is a summary by Chat

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/bombshell-nyt-expose-details-war-crimes-american-led-volunteer-force-ukraine

stock here: more history I didn’t know, that Japan was occupying Korea from 1910 to 1945, see image, which make the NYT article even more inflammatory, as they promote the exploits of the “Chosen Company” since “Chosen” is also a derogatory slur

The article discusses alleged war crimes committed by members of an American-led volunteer unit in Ukraine known as the “Chosen Company.” Key points include:

1. Incident Descriptions:
   • A wounded, unarmed Russian soldier seeking to surrender was shot by a fellow Chosen Company soldier.
   • Another incident involved a Chosen member throwing a grenade at a surrendering Russian soldier with raised hands, captured on video.
2. Verification and Evidence:
   • Grosse, a member of the unit, documented these events in his journal and provided this to The New York Times.
   • The Times verified some incidents with video evidence, showing edited footage released by the Ukrainian military that omitted these war crimes.
   • Text messages from a group chat reviewed by The Times showed Chosen members boasting about killing Russian POWs.
3. Unit’s Internal Reaction:
   • Grosse was disturbed by these events and confronted his commander.
   • Some unit members attempted to enforce silence, warning against speaking to reporters and threatening consequences.
4. Highlighted Individuals:
   • A Greek soldier known as Zeus was central to multiple episodes involving the killing of surrendering Russians.
   • A soldier with the call sign Andok took responsibility for ordering the killings in group chat messages but later claimed he was joking.

The strongest evidence presented includes:

• Grosse’s journal entries.
• Video footage reviewed by The Times.
• Text messages from group chats discussing and boasting about the killings.

The article implies that these incidents could be part of a broader pattern of war crimes by foreign volunteer units in Ukraine, which the mainstream media has largely ignored.

stock here: Great movie submitted by a reader, our military has been appropriated by woke. The trailer is first, and the full movie is at the bottom. Drop a comment, spread the words, I’m doing my goodest.

When the Dems have (maybe intentionally) flubbed the deadlines and procedures for selecting and certifying a candidate, by their choice of a very late Democratic Convention…

And say roughly 10 states will have ZERO Dem candidate for pres or VP, and it is clear “the elections” cannot go on…will then the military step in and follow in lock step to some plot funded by the elite and rewarded” via woke leadership? “And say roughly 10 states will have ZERO Dem candidate for pres or VP, and it is clear “the elections” cannot go on…

Will then the military step in and follow in lock step to some plot funded by the elite and “rewarded” via large donations to foundations or pet causes of the “Woke Leadership”? The Woke in which we know, believe that any actions no matter how heinous are justifiable if the end result is “good”.

It is not outside possibility, although speaking like this is most public places would be outside the Overton window.