https://www.yahoo.com/news/fired-nih-workers-fear-bleak-100700462.html
stock here:
I do believe that CTs are overused. I got one when I had an acute Sciatic nerve issue.
This medical test may cause cancer due to ‘unfathomable’ mistake — and it’s performed 93M times a year in the US
stock here:
Let’s get back to basics. Pelletier’s police staff forced Maui citizens back into the fire, presiding over the largest fire deaths in recent history, those paying attention think it is around 1000 people.
Pelletier also, amazingly, presided over the very suspicious Las Vegas shooting of 50 people.
This guy is pure evil.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25557182/pelletier-coombs-case.pdf
——————————————————————–
Bissen and Pelletier are both evil as hell, maybe agents.
stock here: This has never been NEWS anywhere, and it needs to be.
The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) of Washington, D.C. does investigate officer-involved shootings that occur within its jurisdiction, including those involving federal law enforcement officers. However, in the case of Lt. Michael Byrd, who shot Ashli Babbitt during the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, the investigation was conducted by multiple agencies:
Who Investigated the Shooting of Ashli Babbitt?
The U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)
Byrd was an officer with USCP, which is separate from MPD.
USCP has its own internal investigation procedures.
The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)
MPD did review the shooting, but their role was limited to a procedural investigation as part of the city's standard officer-involved shooting review.
The Department of Justice (DOJ)
The DOJ, through the U.S. Attorney’s Office for D.C., conducted a formal investigation.
In April 2021, the DOJ announced no charges would be filed against Byrd, stating there was insufficient evidence to prove he acted unlawfully.
The House and Senate Security Committees
Various Congressional committees reviewed security failures but did not conduct a criminal investigation into Byrd’s actions.Was Byrd Promoted?
Reports indicate that Michael Byrd was later promoted to captain in the U.S. Capitol Police.
Some critics argue that he was rewarded despite controversy over the shooting.
Supporters of the decision say he acted within the rules of engagement to protect members of Congress.Is MPD Ultimately Responsible?
No, because MPD does not have direct authority over the U.S. Capitol Police.
MPD's role was limited to reviewing the incident, while DOJ and USCP handled the formal investigation.Conclusion
Yes, MPD typically investigates shootings, but in federal cases, their role is often secondary. The primary responsibility for Byrd’s investigation rested with the Capitol Police and the DOJ, not MPD.
———————– more
Additionally, Loudermilk said internal Capitol Police discipline records about Byrd have gone missing.
Loudermilk asked Manger numerous of questions about Byrd, who was promoted to captain last year. He also sought a slew of records, including Byrd’s communications on Capitol Police devices. He seeks responses by Dec. 4.
Loudermilk questioned whether Byrd was receiving favorable treatment by the Capitol Police, given that he was promoted to captain amidst numerous scandals. Byrd and his pet were also allowed to stay in a “Distinguished Visitor Suite” at the “Presidential Inn” from July 8, 2021, through January 28, 2022—at a heavy cost to the taxpayers.
“While I recognize that many of the concerning incidents related to Captain Byrd occurred before you became Chief of Police, Captain Byrd did receive significant favorable treatment by USCP after you became Chief of Police in 2021,” Loudermilk said to Manger.
Meanwhile, Babbitt’s widower, Aaron Babbitt, has an outstanding lawsuit against the U.S. government over Ashli’s death.
Babbitt, a 14-year Air Force veteran, was shot and killed by then-Lt. Byrd while crawling through a window in the Capitol building during the Jan. 6 protests.
Byrd has claimed that he acted with “the utmost courage” and “saved countless lives.”
However, earlier records obtained by Judicial Watch found that other officers at the scene did not see a weapon in Babbitt’s hands prior to the shooting and that they did not hear Byrd issue any verbal commands prior to the shooting. Lt. Byrd later confessed that he shot Ashli before seeing her hands or assessing her intentions or even identifying her as female.
stock here: some AI help
Freemasonry in Pennsylvania
Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania – One of the oldest and most influential Masonic organizations in the U.S.
Founded in 1731 in Philadelphia, making it the first Grand Lodge in the U.S. (pre-dating the country itself).
Benjamin Franklin was a Grand Master in 1734.
The Grand Lodge headquarters is in Philadelphia, housed in the historic Masonic Temple.
Masonic Temple, Philadelphia
One of the most ornate Masonic buildings in the world.
Features elaborate architecture, artwork, and historical artifacts.
Tours are open to the public, and it's considered a Masonic landmark.
Strong Blue Lodge Network
PA has hundreds of Masonic lodges across the state.
Some of the largest membership numbers in the U.S.
Notable Pennsylvania Masons
George Washington (though initiated in Virginia, he had connections to PA lodges).
Benjamin Franklin (instrumental in Freemasonry in early America).
Andrew Gregg Curtin (PA Governor during the Civil War, Masonic leader).
Scottish Rite & York Rite Activity
The Scottish Rite Cathedral in New Castle, PA is one of the most impressive Masonic buildings in the country.
The York Rite also has a presence, tied to Pennsylvania’s colonial history.
Shriners, Eastern Star, and Other Masonic Bodies
Zembo Shrine (Harrisburg), Lu Lu Shrine (Plymouth Meeting), and others are active.
Order of the Eastern Star, DeMolay, and other affiliated organizations have a strong presence.Why is Pennsylvania So Masonic?
Colonial History – Masonry was deeply tied to early American governance.
Philadelphia’s Influence – The city was a Masonic hub in the 1700s.
Revolutionary War Legacy – Many founding fathers were Freemasons, and PA was at the heart of U.S. independence.If you’re looking for Masonic events, lodges, or historical sites in PA, I can help you find specific locations. Are you interested in visiting a lodge, learning about historical Masonry, or something else?
stock here: Censorship is in high swing
well, the real story is that Alex Jones was “fined” 1 billion dollars for stating that Sandy Hook did not happen as it was reported. Children were not murdered, and there is a ton of evidence that SH was a training drill they decided to “take live.
If you dare to speak the truth, you get a 1 billion dollar fine. There, that is the story.——————————————–
Categories
Insanity of the Tavistock Centre
Sent in by Miss Frill, who appears to be on fire. This lady was sacked for speaking truth.
225,891 views Premiered Feb 25, 2024 #NCFHeresiesAfter the closure of the Tavistock’s Gender Identity Service, many people have been left wondering how such institutional medical abuse of children could possibly have happened, and be allowed to happen for so long. How could some of the extremes of gender ideology and critical race theory be adopted by professionals who are supposed to be able to discern sanity from madness?
‘How Psychology Went Mad’ — the 12th episode in the New Culture Forum’s acclaimed #NCFHeresies documentary series — looks at the impact of ideology on psychotherapy, psychology, and psychiatry.
It charts the development of the ‘talking cure’ and how this has become corrupted by far-left dogma and identity politics. In an era of increased censorship, political correctness, and infringements of freedom of speech, how can a profession based on being able to talk freely survive?
In this documentary, Amy Gallagher, describes her own experience of authoritarian ideology interfering with her own psychotherapy training and interviews those who have also spoken up about similar concerns. Amy’s websites:
stock here: her name is Traci Derwin, buy her book! Telling the truth gets you sacked, demoted, fired, attacked. I shall continue to tell the truth.
stock here: Thanks to the Flying Cuttlefish who casts her net far and wide. LOL “ratlines”
stock here: this was helpful
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/dissolution-of-spike-protein-by-nattokinase
I’ll analyze the charts in the image and explain the data clearly. Let me extract the relevant details.
Explanation of the Charts in the Image
The study appears to analyze the degradative effect of Nattokinase on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using biochemical assays and cell viability tests.
Panel (B) – Area Ratio [S Protein/Nuclei]
This graph measures the relative amount of spike protein compared to the number of cell nuclei.
The Y-axis represents the area ratio of S protein to nuclei (no specific units given, but it shows relative quantification).
The X-axis compares control (untreated cells) vs. cells treated with Nattokinase at two concentrations:
25 µg/ml
2.5 µg/ml
Findings:
The control group (untreated) has a high level of spike protein.
Nattokinase at 25 µg/ml shows a drastic reduction in spike protein.
Nattokinase at 2.5 µg/ml also reduces spike protein, but less effectively than the higher dose.
The "*****" (statistical significance) suggests that the reduction in spike protein is statistically significant.Panel (C) – Cell Viability
This measures how healthy the cells remain after treatment with Nattokinase.
The Y-axis represents percentage of viable cells (relative to control, set at 100%).
The X-axis compares:
Control (untreated cells)
Nattokinase (25 µg/ml)
Nattokinase (2.5 µg/ml)
Findings:
Both Nattokinase concentrations do not significantly affect cell viability.
This suggests that Nattokinase degrades the spike protein without killing cells, making it a potential safe treatment.Panel (C) – Western Blots for Spike Protein and ACE2
Western blot images show protein degradation.
Leftmost blot (S Protein):
The S protein band is strong in the control and PBS groups (showing presence of spike protein).
Nattokinase-treated lanes show much weaker bands, confirming spike protein degradation.
The "heat-treated Nattokinase" (negative control) does not degrade spike protein, indicating that the enzyme activity is needed.
Middle blot (RBD-sfGFP fusion protein):
Nattokinase degrades RBD (Receptor Binding Domain), reducing the viral binding ability.
Rightmost blot (ACE2 protein):
ACE2, the human receptor for SARS-CoV-2, is not affected by Nattokinase.
This shows that Nattokinase specifically targets the spike protein and does not harm ACE2, which is crucial for normal cell function.Summary of Key Findings
Nattokinase significantly reduces spike protein levels in a dose-dependent manner.
It does not kill human cells, suggesting it is safe at tested doses.
The enzyme specifically degrades the viral spike protein without affecting ACE2, making it a promising candidate for reducing viral attachment.
Categories
Gender Idiots Described
stock here, I think she did this well
The fringe idea that we all have a ‘gender identity’ that may or may not match our biological sex is the whole point of this discussion. Trans activists act as though the existence of ‘gender identity’ is a settled, self-evident point, when to the vast majority of the world it’s unevidenced, quasi-religious, pseudoscientific nonsense, which has been imposed top down on our society with serious consequences for vulnerable women and troubled youth in particular. Meaningful discussion about competing needs and rights cannot happen inside an elitist ideological bubble where everyone is forced to adopt gender ideology’s approved jargon, accept its self-contradicting slogans as fact and pretend fact-light assertions and feeble sophistry are critical thinking. You tell us to ‘educate’ ourselves, by which you mean, ‘adopt our beliefs unquestioningly,’ but at this point, most of us know your arguments off by heart. These include, but are not limited to: feelings trump facts and unless we agree we’re ‘erasing people from existence’; women and girls aren’t definable entities, so why should they be entitled to their own sports and single-sex spaces; clownfish and people with DSDs mean sex is ‘on a spectrum’ and ‘woman’ is a set of stereotypes associated with the female sex class, so it doesn’t matter if you’ve got a penis, if you identify with those stereotypes you’re ‘valid’. The reason we haven’t been won over by these talking points and remain so tragically ‘uneducated’ isn’t that we’ve failed to grasp the sophistication of your world view. It’s that we think you’re talking unadulterated bullshit and making fools of yourselves.
🙄The fringe idea that we all have a 'gender identity' that may or may not match our biological sex is the whole point of this discussion. Trans activists act as though the existence of 'gender identity' is a settled, self-evident point, when to the vast majority of the world… pic.twitter.com/90R4KUGUWP
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) March 3, 2025
stock here, always thanks to Lot’s Wife from Alaska, just booking my September cruise, research starting today.
“Those demoted include Kathryn Rakoczy, one of the lead prosecutors who secured convictions against several members of the far-right Oath Keepers group for plotting to use force to help Trump remain in power after he lost the 2020 election, the sources said.”
“Martin, who worked to advance Trump’s false claims of a stolen 2020 election…”
“…in the wake of George Floyd’s murder”…the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.”
Ironically, it’s a crime to lie to the FBI, yet the press dances away scot-free. Americans are slowly opening their eyes to journalism’s betrayal. You’ve sold your soul, Sarah.
Please pass my sentiments to your co-conspirators,
Andrew Goudsward, Andy Sullivan, and Nia Williams.
Shameful….just shameful….why did they trot her out?
stock here: lots to unpack, A-Eye helps
You said:
give me a reality check on all this, and i thought in early 1900’s what is now palestine and gaza was a thriving palestinian society with lots of trade and culture…..
Basic History for the Uninformed:
- Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Crusader Frankish and the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there were the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
- there was the Sassanid-Persian Empire before the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Sassanid-Persian Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire again, not a Palestinian state.
- there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state, before the Byzantine Empire.
- Before the Roman Empire, there was the Jewish Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Jewish Hasmonean state was the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Hellenistic Seleucid empire, there was Alexander the Great’s empire, not a Palestinian state.
- Before Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Babylonian Empire, the kingdoms of Israel and Judah were not Palestinian states.
- Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the Kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
- Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state.
There have been many governments there, but never a Palestine.
ChatGPT said:
Reality Check: History, Identity, and Nationhood in Palestine
Your list accurately presents a chronology of ruling powers in the region now known as Israel, Palestine, and surrounding territories. However, framing history strictly in terms of statehood rather than people, culture, and identity is incomplete. Let’s break it down in a clearer and more balanced way.
- Was there ever a “State of Palestine” in modern history?
No, there has never been a sovereign nation-state called “Palestine” in the modern legal sense. However:
Nation-states as we define them today (with clear borders and centralized governments) didn’t even exist in most of human history.
That doesn’t mean Palestinians didn’t exist. They were part of larger empires and ruling systems, much like many other peoples who lacked independent states.
- Was Palestine a thriving society before Israel?
Yes. While it was under Ottoman and later British control, the area known as Palestine (including Gaza and the West Bank) had a mix of Arab, Jewish, Christian, and other communities with rich trade, agriculture, and culture.
Late Ottoman Era (1800s–1917): Major Palestinian cities like Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem were commercial hubs, with vibrant markets, trade routes, and cultural exchanges.
British Mandate (1917–1948): Palestine had newspapers, political parties, universities, and a growing national identity.
The idea that Palestine was empty or undeveloped before Israel is misleading.
- Why wasn’t there a Palestinian state before Israel?
Palestinians, like many other Arab communities, were part of larger empires (Ottoman, Mamluk, etc.) for centuries, and the modern concept of nation-states was imposed by European colonial powers in the 20th century.
The British prevented Palestinian statehood, much like they did with other colonies, because of geopolitical interests.
The UN proposed partitioning the land into separate Jewish and Arab states in 1947, but conflict broke out, and no independent Palestinian state emerged.
- If Palestine wasn’t a state, does that mean Palestinians aren’t a people?
No. Palestinians are an ethnic, cultural, and historical people, just as Kurds, Tibetans, and other stateless nations are.
Many nations existed long before they had official states (e.g., Italy and Germany only unified in the 19th century).
The absence of a formal “Palestinian state” in history doesn’t mean Palestinians are not a real people with a legitimate history in the land.
- What about Jews in the region?
Jews have an ancient connection to the land going back thousands of years.
The Jewish population in Palestine grew significantly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries due to Zionist immigration, especially from Europe.
The conflict is not about whether Jews belong—it’s about how two national groups (Jews and Arabs) with deep ties to the land can or cannot coexist politically. - What’s the actual debate today?
Israelis see the land as their historic and rightful homeland.
Palestinians see it as their homeland, where they lived for centuries before the creation of Israel.
The question is how to resolve competing claims, not whether one side has the right to exist.
Conclusion
No, Palestine was not an independent nation-state before Israel.
Yes, Palestinian society existed, with trade, culture, and governance under various empires.
Both Israelis and Palestinians have legitimate historical ties to the land.
The challenge today is how to reconcile these competing histories and claims rather than denying either side’s existence.
This is a complex issue, but reducing it to “there was never a Palestinian state” misses the bigger picture—history is about more than just legal borders.
LOL, just perfect
TDS is such a sad virus to see in action. These are the headlines…..
stock here: Gov Evers is on a roll….what do they “have” on this creep, or is he willingly going along with this BS?
The story from the Maciver Institute was confusing. A-Eye cleared it up for me.
Supreme Court Case Could Bring Down Wisconsin’s Entire Bureaucracy
This situation in Wisconsin boils down to a power struggle between Governor Tony Evers and the state legislature over who gets to write and approve regulations. Here’s a simplified breakdown of what’s happening:
What’s the Issue?
Normally, lawmakers make broad laws and let government agencies (the bureaucracy) write the detailed rules on how those laws work.
Before those rules take effect, the legislature reviews and approves them—a system that’s been in place for 70 years.
Evers argues that this process violates separation of powers—saying only the governor’s agencies should decide the rules, without legislative approval.
Why Does This Matter?
If Evers wins the lawsuit, bureaucratic agencies would be able to create and enforce rules without oversight from elected lawmakers.
If the legislature can’t approve agency rules anymore, they will have to change how they write laws—spelling out every little detail instead of leaving things open-ended.
The legislature may also cut funding to state agencies that enforce regulations, potentially crippling the bureaucracy.
What Could Happen?
If the Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with Evers, state agencies will gain massive power, and lawmakers will lose control over rule-making.
If the court sides with the legislature, it could wipe out the entire bureaucratic rule-making system, forcing lawmakers to take direct control over every regulation.
Why Is This Explosive?
The entire state bureaucracy could collapse if courts decide that the current system is unconstitutional.
This would force Wisconsin to completely rethink how laws and regulations are created.
It could also set a precedent for other states and even the federal government, where unelected bureaucrats have been making rules for decades.
Bottom Line
Evers’ lawsuit could radically change how Wisconsin’s government works—either giving him and state agencies more control or forcing lawmakers to dismantle the entire bureaucratic rule-making system. The outcome could shake up the state’s entire government structure and budgeting process.
stock here, seen on Nextdoor
Freedom of Choice & Medical Autonomy
If your child is vaccinated, then they should be protected—right? That’s what we were told by Fauci and the former president: “If you take the shot, you’re protected.” But that turned out to be wrong—just like “safe and effective.”
The truth is, vaccinations are not 100% safe, which is why parents must sign consent forms acknowledging potential side effects. No two people are the same, so healthcare cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach. We are not robots, though they tried to make us act like them—masking us, isolating us, and enforcing made-up rules like the 6-ft distancing (which even Fauci admitted was fabricated).
Parental Rights & Government Overreach
You cannot force your health beliefs on me, my children, or anyone else. You have the right to choose for your child, and so do I. That’s called freedom.
Public education is a right—we pay taxes for it. If someone prefers homeschooling, that’s their choice, too.
Religious freedom protects medical decisions—no one should be forced to violate their beliefs.
Vaccination status is private—you wouldn’t ask someone about their medical records, so why is this any different?
If people don’t like this, they can move to a country that dictates personal medical choices. America is about freedom.
The Last Few Years Were a Disaster
Look at what happened during COVID:
Kids were masked for far too long, even if they got the shot.
Athletes who just wanted to play sports ended up dead—was it myocarditis from the shot?
Healthy people don’t just drop dead suddenly, yet we’ve seen it happen over and over again.
People were coerced into taking the shot just to keep their jobs, including healthcare workers who worked exhausting hours to cover for those who chose medical freedom.
And here we are, years later—people are sicker than ever.
Immunity problems are skyrocketing—keeping kids inside, in front of a screen, away from sunlight and social interaction, didn’t help.
Mental health is in crisis—so many adults and kids suffered isolation, anxiety, and depression.
Discrimination against the unvaccinated was rampant—all to make money.
Moving Forward: Real Health, Not Fear-Based Control
We need real public health solutions:
✔ Healthier food—not ultra-processed junk.
✔ More exercise for kids—not just once a week at school.
✔ True medical freedom—no more coercion or mandates.
It’s time to stop the charade.
We now know the shot was not safe and not effective—so why keep pushing it? Live your life. Make your choices. Let others do the same.
🇺🇸 This is America—where freedom of choice, speech, and religion still exist. Stop worrying about what others do with their bodies and start focusing on truly rebuilding our health and economy.