stock here: “because of the sensitivity of the matter”, James Comey, what a POS.
The DNC Convention starts tomorrow. I have been requested to repost “THE BIG WHY” explanation. When we understand just how much corruption was needed in the weaponization of the modern IC, we start to understand why the effort to hide it will continue.
President Barack Obama and his Attorney General Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; instead, what they did was take the preexisting system and retool it, so the weapons only targeted one side of the political continuum. This point is where many people understandably get confused.
In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.
What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms so that only their ideological opposition became the target of the new national security system. This is very important to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline.
Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01. DHS came along in 2002, and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed. When Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.
The preexisting Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Dept of Justice (DOJ) were then repurposed to become two of the four pillars of the domestic national security apparatus. However, this new construct would have a targeting mechanism based on political ideology. The DHS, ODNI, DOJ and FBI became the four pillars of this new institution. Atop these pillars is where you will find the Fourth Branch of Government.
We were not sleeping when this happened, we were wide awake. However, we were stunningly distracted by the economic collapse that was taking place in 2006 and 2007 when the engineers behind Obama started to assemble the design. By the time Obama took office in 2009, we sensed something profound was shifting, but we can only see exactly what shifted in the aftermath. The four pillars were put into place, and a new Fourth Branch of Government was quietly created.
As time passed, and the system operators became familiar with their new tools, technology allowed the tentacles of the system to reach out and touch us. That is when we first started to notice that something very disconcerting was happening. Those four pillars are the root of it, and if we take the time to understand how the Fourth Branch originated, questions about this current state of perpetual angst will start to make sense.
Grab a cup of your favorite beverage, and take a walk with me as we outline how this was put together. You might find many of the questions about our current state of political affairs beginning to make a lot more sense.
Remember, it is not my intent to outline the entire history of how we got to this place where the intelligence community now acts as the superseding fourth branch of government. Such an effort would be exhausting and likely take our discussion away from understanding the current dynamic.
History provided enough warnings from Dwight D. Eisenhower (military), to John F. Kennedy (CIA), to Richard Nixon (FBI), to all modern versions of warnings and frustrations from HPSCI Devin Nunes and ODNI Ric Grenell. None of those prior reference points are invalid, and all documented outlines of historic reference are likely true and accurate. However, a generational review is not useful, as the reference impacting us ‘right now‘ gets lost.
Instead, we pick up the expansive and weaponized intelligence system as it manifests after 9/11/01, and my goal is to highlight how the modern version of the total intelligence apparatus has now metastasized into a Fourth Branch of Government. It is this superseding branch that now touches and influences every facet of our life.
If we take the modern construct, originating at the speed of technological change, we can also see how the oversight or “check/balance” in our system of government became functionally obsolescent.
After many years of granular research about the intelligence apparatus inside our government, in the summer of 2020 I visited Washington DC to ask specific questions. My goal was to go where the influence agents within government actually operate, and to discover the people deep inside the institutions no one elected and few people pay attention to.
It was during this process when I discovered how information is purposefully put into containment silos; essentially a formal process to block the flow of information between agencies and between the original branches.
While frustrating to discover, the silo effect was important because understanding the communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place.
After days of research and meetings in DC during the summer of 2020, the subsequent discussions were perhaps the most important. After many hours of specific questions and answers on specific examples, I realized why our nation is in this mess. That is when I discovered the fourth and superseding branch of government, the Intelligence Branch.
I am going to explain how the Intelligence Branch works: (1) to control every other branch of government; (2) how it functions as an entirely independent branch of government with no oversight; (3) how and why it was created to be independent from oversight; (4) what is the current mission of the IC Branch, and most importantly (5) who operates it.
The Intelligence Branch is an independent functioning branch of government, it is no longer a subsidiary set of agencies within the Executive Branch as most would think. To understand the Intelligence Branch, we need to drop the elementary school civics class lessons about three coequal branches of government and replace that outlook with the modern system that created itself.
The Intelligence Branch functions much like the State Dept, through a unique set of public-private partnerships that support it. Big Tech industry collaboration with intelligence operatives is part of that functioning; almost like an NGO. However, the process is much more important than most think. In this problematic perspective of a corrupt system of government, the process is the flaw – not the outcome.
There are people making decisions inside this little known, unregulated and out-of-control branch of government that impact every facet of our lives.
None of the people operating deep inside the Intelligence Branch were elected, and our elected representative House members genuinely do not know how the system works. I assert this position affirmatively because I have talked to House and Senate staffers, including the chiefs of staff for multiple House & Senate committee seats. They are not malicious people; however, they are genuinely clueless of things that happen outside their silo. That is part of the purpose of me explaining it, with examples, in full detail with sunlight.
We begin….
In April of 2016, the FBI launched a counterintelligence operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump. The questioning about that operation is what New York Representative Elise Stefanik cites in March of 2017, approximately 11 months later (First Two Minutes).
Things to note:
♦ Notice how FBI Director James Comey just matter-of-factly explains no one outside the DOJ was informed about the FBI operation. Why? Because that’s just the way things are done. His justification for unilateral operations was “because of the sensitivity of the matter“, totally ignoring any constitutional or regulatory framework for oversight; because, well, quite simply, there isn’t any. The intelligence apparatus inside the DOJ/FBI can, and does, operate based on their own independent determinations of authority.
♦ Notice also how FBI Director Comey shares his perspective that informing the National Security Council (NSC) is the equivalent of notifying the White House. The FBI leadership expressly believe they bear no responsibility to brief the Chief Executive. As long as they tell some unknown, unelected, bureaucratic entity inside the NSC, their unwritten responsibility to inform the top of their institutional silo is complete. If the IC wants to carve out the Oval Office, they simply plant information inside the NSC and, from their perspective, their civic responsibility to follow checks-and-balances is complete. This is an intentional construct.
♦ Notice how Comey obfuscates notification to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), by avoiding the fact James Clapper was the DNI from outset of the counterintelligence operation throughout the remainder of Obama’s term. When I get deeper into the process, we will understand how the Intelligence Branch has intentionally used the creation of the DNI position (established post 9/11/01) as a method to avoid oversight, not enhance it. Keeping an oblivious doofus like James Clapper in position held strategic value [Doofus Reminder HERE].
That video of James Comey being questioned by Elise Stefanik was the first example given to me by someone who knew the background of everything that was taking place preceding that March 20, 2017, hearing. That FBI reference point is a key to understand how the Intelligence Branch operates with unilateral authority above Congress (legislative branch), above the White House (executive branch), and even above the court system (judicial branch).
Also, watch this short video of James Clapper because it is likely many readers have forgotten, and likely even more readers have never seen it. Watch closely how then White House national security adviser John Brennan is responding in that video. This is before Brennan became CIA Director, this is when Brennan was helping Barack Obama put the pillars into place. WATCH:
[Sidebar: Every time I post this video it gets scrubbed from YouTube (example), so save it if you ever want to see it again.]
The video of James Clapper highlights how the ODNI position (created with good national security intention) ended up becoming the fulcrum for modern weaponization, and is now an office manipulated by agencies with a vested interest in retaining power. The Intelligence Branch holds power over the ODNI through their influence and partnership with the body that authorizes the power within it, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).
Factually, the modern intelligence apparatus uses checks and balances in their favor. The checks create silos of proprietary information, classified information, vaults of information that work around oversight issues. The silos are part of the problem.
Ironically, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created in the aftermath of 9/11/01 expressly to eliminate the silos of information which they felt led to a domestic terrorist attack that could have been prevented. The ODNI was created specifically upon the recommendation of the 9/11 commission.
The intent was to create a central hub of intelligence information, inside the Executive Branch, where the CIA, NSA, DoD, DoS, and DIA could deposit their unique intelligence products and a repository would be created so that domestic intelligence operations, like the DOJ and FBI could access them when needed to analyze threats to the U.S. This, they hoped, would ensure the obvious flags missed in the 9/11 attacks would not be missed again.
The DNI office created a problem for those who operate in the shadows of proprietary information. You’ll see how it was critical to install a person uniquely skilled in being an idiot, James Clapper, into that willfully blind role while intelligence operatives worked around the office to assemble the Intelligence Branch of Government.
• The last federal budget that flowed through the traditional budgetary process was signed into law in September of 2007 for fiscal year 2008 by George W. Bush. Every budget since then has been a fragmented process of continuing resolutions and individual spending bills.
Why does this matter? Because many people think defunding the Intelligence Community is a solution; it is not…. at least, not yet. Worse yet, the corrupt divisions deep inside the U.S. intelligence system can now fund themselves from multinational private sector partnerships (banks, corporations and foreign entities).
• When Democrats took over the House of Representatives in January 2007, they took office with a plan. Nancy Pelosi became Speaker, and Democrats controlled the Senate where Harry Reid was Majority Leader. Barack Obama was a junior senator from Illinois.
Pelosi and Reid intentionally did not advance a budget in 2008 (for fiscal year 2009) because their plan included installing Barack Obama (and all that came with him) with an open checkbook made even more lucrative by a worsening financial crisis and a process called baseline budgeting. Baseline budgeting means the prior fiscal year budget is accepted as the starting point for the next year budget. All previous expenditures are baked into the cake within baseline budgeting.
Massive bailouts preceded Obama’s installation due to U.S. economic collapse, and massive bailouts continued after his installation. This is the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ aspect. TARP (Troubled Asset Recovery Program), auto bailouts (GM), and the massive stimulus spending bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, ie. those shovel ready jobs) were all part of the non budget spending. The federal reserve assisted with Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) as congress passed various Porkulous spending bills further spending and replacing the formal budget process.
Note: There has never been a budget passed in the normal/traditional process since September of 2007.
• While Obama’s radical ‘transformation‘ was triggered across a broad range of government institutions, simultaneously spending on the U.S. military was cut, but spending on the intelligence apparatus expanded. We were all distracted by Obamacare, and the Republican party wanted to keep us that way. However, in the background there was a process of transformation taking place that included very specific action by Eric Holder and targeted effort toward the newest executive agency the ODNI.
The people behind Obama, those same people now behind Joe Biden, knew from years of strategic planning that ‘radical transformation’ would require control over specific elements inside the U.S. government. Eric Holder played a key role in his position as U.S. Attorney General in the DOJ.
AG Holder recruited ideologically aligned political operatives who were aware of the larger institutional objectives. One of those objectives was weaponizing the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) a division inside the DOJ that had no inspector general oversight. For most people the DOJ-NSD weaponization surfaced with a hindsight awakening of the DOJ-NSD targeting candidate Donald Trump many years later. However, by then the Holder crew had executed almost eight full years of background work.
• The second larger Obama/Holder objective was control over the FBI. Why was that important? Because the FBI does the domestic investigative work on anyone who needs or holds a security clearance. The removal of security clearances could be used as a filter to further build the internal ideological army they were assembling. Additionally, with new power in the ODNI created as a downstream consequence of the Patriot Act, new protocols for U.S. security clearances were easy to justify.
Carefully selecting fellow ideological travelers was facilitated by this filtration within the security clearance process. How does that issue later manifest? Just look around at how politicized every intelligence agency has become, specifically including the FBI.
• At the exact same time this new background security clearance process was ongoing, again everyone distracted by the fight over Obamacare, inside the Department of State (Secretary Hillary Clinton) a political alignment making room for the next phase was being assembled. Names like Samantha Power, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton were familiar on television while Lisa Monaco worked as a legal liaison between the Obama White House and Clinton State Department.
Through the Dept of State (DoS) the intelligence apparatus began working on their first steps to align Big Tech with a larger domestic institutional objective. Those of you who remember the “Arab Spring”, some say “Islamist Spring”, will remember it was triggered by Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo – his first foreign trip. The State Department worked with grassroots organizers (mostly Muslim Brotherhood) in Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar and Libya. Obama leaned heavily on the organizational network of Turkish President Recep Erdogan for contacts and support.
Why does this aspect matter to us? Well, you might remember how much effort the Obama administration put into recruiting Facebook and Twitter as resources for the various mideast rebellions the White House and DoS supported. This was the point of modern merge between the U.S. intelligence community and Big Tech social media.
In many ways, the coordinated political outcomes in Libya and Egypt were the beta test for the coordinated domestic political outcomes we saw in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The U.S. intelligence community working with social media platforms and political operatives.
Overlaying all of that background activity was also a new alignment of the Obama-era intelligence apparatus with ideological federal “contractors“. Where does this contractor activity manifest? In the FISA Court opinion of Rosemary Collyer who cited the “interagency memorandum of understanding”, or MOU.
Hopefully, you can see a small part of how tentacled the system to organize/weaponize the intelligence apparatus was. None of this was accidental, all of this was by design, and the United States Senate was responsible for intentionally allowing most of this to take place.
That’s the 30,000/ft level backdrop history of what was happening as the modern IC was created. Next we will go into how all these various intelligence networks began working in unison and how they currently control all of the other DC institutions under them; including how they can carve out the President from knowing their activity.
♦ When Barack Obama was installed in January 2009, the Democrats held a 60 seat majority in the U.S. Senate. As the people behind the Obama installation began executing their longer-term plan, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was a tool to create the Intelligence Branch; it was not an unintentional series of events.
When Obama was installed, Dianne Feinstein was the Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), and Democrat operative Dan Jones was her lead staffer. Feinstein was completely controlled by those around her including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The CIA was in the process of turning over personnel following the Bush era, and as a result of a massive multi-year narrative of diminished credibility (Iraq WMD), a deep purge was underway. Obama/Holder were in the process of shifting intelligence alignment and the intensely political Democrat Leader Harry Reid was a key participant.
THE TRAP – Many people say that Congress is the solution to eliminating the Fourth and superseding Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. This is an exercise in futility because the Legislative Branch, specifically the SSCI, facilitated the creation of the Intelligence Branch. The SSCI cannot put the genie they created back in the bottle without admitting they too are corrupt; and the background story of their corruption is way too intense to be exposed now.
Every member of the SSCI is compromised in some controlling manner. Those Senators who disliked the control over them; specifically disliked because the risk of sunlight was tenuous and, well, possible; have either left completely or stepped down from the committee. None of the SSCI members past or present would ever contemplate saying openly what their tenure involved.
[Note: You might remember when Vice Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced, there was a controlled Republican SSCI member who came to his defense in February of 2018. It was not accidental that exact Senator later became the chair of the SSCI himself. That Republican Senator is Marco Rubio, now vice-chair since the Senate re-flipped back to the optics of Democrat control in 2021.]
All of President Obama’s 2009 intelligence appointments required confirmation from the Senate. The nominees had to first pass through the Democrat controlled SSCI, and then to a full Senate vote where Democrats held a 60 vote majority. Essentially, Obama got everyone he wanted in place easily. Rahm Emmanuel was Obama’s Chief of Staff, and Valerie Jarrett was Senior Advisor.
Tim Geithner was Treasury Secretary in 2010 when the joint DOJ/FBI and IRS operation to target the Tea Party took place after the midterm “shellacking” caused by the Obamacare backlash. Mitch McConnell was Minority Leader in the Senate but supported the targeting of the Tea Party as his Senate colleagues were getting primaried by an angry and effective grassroots campaign. McConnell’s friend, Senator Bob Bennett, getting beaten in Utah was the final straw.
Dirty Harry and Mitch McConnell saw the TEA Party through the same prism. The TEA Party took Kennedy’s seat in Massachusetts (Scott Brown); Sharon Angle was about to take out Harry Reid in Nevada; Arlen Spector was taken down in Pennsylvania; Senator Robert Byrd died; Senator Lisa Murkowski lost her primary to Joe Miller in Alaska; McConnell’s nominee Mike Castle lost to Christine O’Donnell in Delaware; Rand Paul won in Kentucky. This is the background. The peasants were revolting…. and visibly angry Mitch McConnell desperately made a deal with the devil to protect himself.
In many ways, the TEA Party movement was/is very similar to the MAGA movement. The difference in 2010 was the absence of a head of the movement, in 2015 Donald Trump became that head figure who benefited from the TEA Party energy. Trump came into office in 2017 with the same congressional opposition as the successful TEA Party candidates in 2011.
Republicans took control of the Senate following the 2014 mid-terms. Republicans took control of the SSCI in January 2015. Senator Richard Burr became chairman of the SSCI, and Dianne Feinstein shifted to Vice-Chair. Dirty Harry Reid left the Senate, and Mitch McConnell took power again.
Republicans were in control of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2015 when the Intelligence Branch operation against candidate Donald Trump was underway. [Feinstein’s staffer, Dan Jones, left the SSCI so he could act as a liaison and political operative between private-sector efforts (Fusion GPS, Chris Steele) and the SSCI.] The SSCI was a participant in that Fusion-GPS/Chris Steele operation, and as a direct consequence Republicans were inherently tied to the problem with President Trump taking office in January of 2017. Indiana Republican Senator Dan Coats was a member of the SSCI.
Bottom line…. When it came to the intelligence system targeting Donald Trump during the 2015/2016 primary, the GOP was just as much at risk as their Democrat counterparts.
When Trump unexpectedly won the 2016 election, the SSCI was shocked more than most. They knew countermeasures would need to be deployed to protect themselves from any exposure of their intelligence conduct. Dianne Feinstein stepped down, and Senator Mark Warner was elevated to Vice Chairman.
Indiana’s own Mike Pence, now Vice President, recommended fellow Hoosier, SSCI Senator Dan Coats, to become President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). [Apply hindsight here]
• To give an idea of the Intelligence Branch power dynamic, remind yourself how House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), Chairman Devin Nunes, tried to get access to the DOJ/FBI records of the FISA application used against the Trump campaign via Carter Page.
Remember, Devin Nunes only saw a portion of the FISA trail from his review of a Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) previously given to President Obama. Chairman Nunes had to review the PDB at the White House SCIF due to compartmented intelligence, another example of the silo benefit.
Remember the massive stonewalling and blocking of the DOJ/FBI toward Nunes? Remember the back and forth battle over declassification surrounding the Nunes memo?
Remember, after Nunes went directly to House Speaker Paul Ryan for help (didn’t get any), the DOJ only permitted two members from each party within the HPSCI to review the documents, and only at the DOJ offices of main justice?
Contrast that amount of House Intel Committee railroading and blocking by intelligence operatives in the DOJ, DOJ-NSD and FBI, with the simple request by Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Mark Warner asking to see the Carter Page FISA application and immediately a copy being delivered to him on March 17th 2017.
Can you see which intelligence committee is aligned with the deepest part of the deep state?
Oh, how quickly we forget:
The contrast of ideological alignment between the House, Senate and Intelligence Branch is crystal clear when viewed through the prism of cooperation. You can see which legislative committee holds the power and support of the Intelligence Branch. The Senate Intel Committee facilitates the corrupt existence of the IC Branch, so the IC Branch only cooperates with the Senate Intel Committee. It really is that simple.
• The Intelligence Branch carefully selects its own members by controlling how security clearances are investigated and allowed (FBI). The Intelligence Branch also uses compartmentalization of intelligence as a way to keep each agency, and each downstream branch of government (executive, legislative and judicial), at arms length as a method to stop anyone from seeing the larger picture of their activity. I call this the “silo effect“, and it is done by design.
I have looked at stunned faces when I presented declassified silo product from one agency to the silo customers of another. You would be astonished at what they don’t know because it is not in their ‘silo’.
Through the advise and consent rules, the Intelligence Branch uses the SSCI to keep out people they consider dangerous to their ongoing operations. Any appointee to the intelligence community must first pass through the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, before they get a full Senate vote. If the SSCI rejects the candidate, they simply refuse to take up the nomination. The president is then blocked from that appointment. This is what happened with President Trump over-and-over again.
• Additionally, the Intelligence Branch protects itself, and its facilitating allies through the formal classification process. The Intelligence Branch gets to decide unilaterally what information will be released and what information will be kept secret. There is no entity outside the Intelligence Branch, and yes that includes the President of the United States, who can supersede the classification authority of the Intelligence Branch. {Go Deep} and {Go Deep} This is something 99.9% of the people on our side get totally and frustratingly wrong.
No one can declassify, or make public, anything the Intelligence Branch will not agree to. Doubt this? Ask Ric Grenell, John Ratcliffe, or even President Trump himself.
• The classification process is determined inside the Intelligence Branch, all by themselves. They get to choose what rank of classification exists on any work-product they create; and they get to decide what the classification status is of any work product that is created by anyone else. The Intelligence Branch has full control over what is considered classified information and what is not. The Intelligence Branch defines what is a “national security interest” and what is not. A great technique for hiding fingerprints of corrupt and illegal activity.
[For familiar reference see the redactions to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages. The Intelligence Branch does all redactions.]
• Similarly, the declassification process is a request by an agency, even a traditionally superior agency like the President of the United States, to the Intelligence Branch asking for them to release the information. The Intelligence Branch again holds full unilateral control. If the head of the CIA refuses to comply with the declassification instruction of the President, what can the president do except fire him/her? {Again, GO DEEP} How does the President replace the non-compliant cabinet member? They have to go through the SSCI confirmation. See the problem?
Yes, there are ways to break up the Intelligence Branch, but they do not start with any congressional effort. As you can see above, the process is the flaw – not the solution. Most conservative pundits have their emphasis on the wrong syllable. Their cornerstone is false.
For their own self-preservation, the Intelligence Branch has been interfering in our elections for years. The way to tear this apart begins with STATE LEVEL election reform that blocks the Legislative Branch from coordinating with the Intelligence Branch.
The extreme federalism approach is critical and also explains why Joe Biden has instructed Attorney General Merrick Garland to use the full power of the DOJ to stop state level election reform efforts. The worry of successful state level election control is also why the Intelligence Branch now needs to support the federal takeover of elections.
Our elections have been usurped by the Intelligence Branch. Start with honest elections and we will see just how much Democrat AND Republican corruption is dependent on manipulated election results. Start at the state level. Start there…. everything else is downstream.
♦ People want examples, reference points for work the Intelligence Branch conducts, specifically how it protects itself.
Here is an example: Julian Assange.
Yes, the history of the U.S. national security apparatus goes back decades; however, the weaponization of that apparatus, the creation of an apex branch of government, the Intelligence Branch, originated –as we currently feel it– under President Barack Obama.
Obama took the foundational tools created by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and used the intelligence system architecture to create a weapon for use in his fundamental transformation. An alliance of ideologues within government (intel community) and the private sector (big tech and finance) was assembled, and the largest government weapon was created. Think about this every time you take your shoes off at an airport.
After the weapon was assembled and tested (Arab Spring), the Legislative Branch was enjoined under the auspices of a common enemy, Donald J. Trump, an outsider who was a risk to every entity in the institutional construct of Washington DC. Trillions were at stake, and years of affluence and influence were at risk as the unholy alliance was put together.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to U.S. Intelligence Branch interests, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016.
It is within the network of foreign and domestic intel operations where Intelligence Branch political tool, FBI Agent Peter Strzok, was working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI counterintelligence operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep}
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets much easier.
HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and yet withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page that also mentions George Papadopoulos. The FBI also fabricated information in the FISA.
However, there is an aspect to the domestic U.S. operation that also bears the fingerprints of the international intelligence apparatus; only this time, due to the restrictive laws on targets inside the U.S., the CIA aspect is less prominent. This is where FBI Agent Peter Strzok working for both agencies was important.
Remember, it’s clear in the text messages Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA. Additionally, former CIA Director John Brennan has admitted Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and Peter Strzok wrote the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief allied intelligence officials connected to the Australian Ambassador to the U.K, Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for the Intelligence Branch and CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015; at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons, the 2015 GOP candidates for President.
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working double agents for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion-GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting… back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s private sector handler [NOTE: remember, the public-private sector partnership], it was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Patrick Byrne the instructions on where to send Butina. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that eventually settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. The international operations of the Intelligence Branch were directed by the FBI/CIA; and the domestic operations were coordinated by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA), and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be a Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr (CIA, Fusion-GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Donald Trump Jr (FBI). All of these activities were coordinated.
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer, hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. However, Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this foreign and domestic engagement was directly controlled by collaborating U.S. intelligence agencies from inside the Intelligence Branch. And all of this coordinated activity was intended to give a specific Russia influence/interference impression.
♦ The key point of all that background context is to see how committed the Intelligence Branch was to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and DOJ-NSD, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We also know that John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talked to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is important because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks.
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the EDVA. From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, and it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What was the DOJ waiting for?
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after Congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Knowing how much effort the Intelligence Branch put into the false Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange, monitor all activity, and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the EDVA grand jury, the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The DOJ sat on the indictment while the Mueller/Weissmann probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller/Weissmann probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who has researched this fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; this timing against Assange is too coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange. The Weissmann/Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes for justification, and that narrative was contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment; and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC and FBI contractor.
The CIA holds a self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim; the FBI holds an interest in maintaining that claim; the U.S. media hold an interest in maintaining that claim. All of the foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also have a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.
This “Russian hacking” claim was ultimately important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus, it forms the corner of their justification. With that level of importance, well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Julian Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Weissmann/Mueller report was going to be public.
…. and that’s exactly what they did. They threw a bag over Assange.
♦ COLLAPSED OVERSIGHT – The modern system to ‘check’ the Executive Branch was the creation of the legislative “Gang of Eight,” a legislative oversight mechanism intended to provide a bridge of oversight between the authority of the intelligence community within the Executive Branch.
The Go8 construct was designed to allow the President authority to carry out intelligence operations and provide the most sensitive notifications to a select group within Congress.
The Go8 oversight is directed to the position, not the person, and consists of: (1) The Speaker of the House; (2) The Minority Leader of the House; (3) The Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, HPSCI; (4) The Ranking Member (minority) of the HPSCI; (5) The Leader of the Senate; (6) The Minority Leader of the Senate; (7) The Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, SSCI; and finally (8) the Vice-Chair of the SSCI.
Example: When the Chief Executive (the President) initiates an intelligence operation on behalf of the United States, the President triggers a “finding memo.” In essence, the instruction to the intel agency or agencies to authorize a covert operation. When that process takes place, the Go8 are the first people notified. Depending on the sensitivity of the operation, sometimes the G08 are notified immediately after the operation is conducted. The notification can be a phone call or an in-person briefing.
Because of the sensitivity of their intelligence information, the Gang of Eight hold security clearances that permit them to receive and review all intelligence operations. The intelligence community are also responsible for briefing the Go8 with the same information they use to brief the President.
~ 2021 Gang of Eight ~
The Go8 design is intended to put intelligence oversight upon both political parties in Congress; it is designed that way by informing the minority leaders of both the House and Senate as well as the ranking minority members of the SSCI and HPSCI. Under the concept, the President cannot conduct an intelligence operation; and the intelligence community cannot carry out intelligence gathering operations without the majority and minority parties knowing about it.
The modern design of this oversight system was done to keep rogue and/or corrupt intelligence operations from happening. However, as we shared in the preview to this entire discussion, the process was usurped during the Obama era. {GO DEEP}
Former FBI Director James Comey openly admitted to Congress on March 20, 2017, that the FBI, FBI Counterintelligence Division, DOJ and DOJ-National Security Division, together with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the CIA, had been conducting independent investigations of Donald Trump for over a year without informing the Go8. Comey justified the lack of informing Go8 oversight by saying, “because of the sensitivity of the matter.”
Stupidly, Congress never pressed James Comey on that issue. The arrogance was astounding, and the acceptance by Congress was infuriating. However, that specific example highlighted just how politically corrupt the system had become. In essence, Team Obama usurped the entire design of congressional oversight…. and Congress just brushed it off.
Keep in mind, Comey did not say the White House was unaware; in fact he said exactly the opposite, he said, “The White House was informed through the National Security Council,” (the NSC). The implication, the very direct and specific implication; the unavoidable implication and James Comey admission that everyone just brushed aside, was that President Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was totally informed of the intelligence operation(s) against Donald Trump. After all, the NSC reports to the National Security Advisor.
Does the January 20, 2017, Susan Rice memo look different now?
Again, no one saw the immediate issue. What Comey just described on that March day in 2017 was the total usurpation of the entire reason the Gang of Eight exists; to eliminate the potential for political weaponization of the Intelligence Community by the executive branch. The G08 notifications to the majority and minority are specifically designed to make sure what James Comey admitted to doing was never supposed to happen.
Team Obama carried out a political operation using the intelligence community and the checks-and-balances in the system were intentionally usurped. This is an indisputable fact.
Worse still, the entire legislative branch of Congress, which specifically includes the Republicans that now controlled the House and Senate, did nothing. They just ignored what was admitted. The usurpation was willfully ignored. The mechanism of the G08 was bypassed without a twitch of condemnation or investigation…. because the common enemy was Donald Trump.
This example highlights the collapse of the system. Obama, the executive branch, collapsed the system by usurping the process; in essence the process became the bigger issue and the lack of immediate legislative branch reaction became evidence of open acceptance. The outcomes of the usurpation played out over the next four years, Donald J. Trump was kneecapped and lost his presidency because of it. However, the bigger issue of the collapse still exists.
The downstream consequence of the Legislative Branch accepting the Executive Branch usurpation meant both intelligence committees were compromised. Additionally, the leadership of both the House and Senate were complicit. Think about this carefully. The Legislative Branch allowance of the intelligence usurpation meant the Legislative Branch was now subservient to the Intelligence Branch.
That’s where we are.
Right now.
That’s where we are.
Term-3 Obama is now back in the White House with Joe Biden.
Term-1 and Term-2 Obama usurped the ‘check and balance‘ within the system and weaponized the intelligence apparatus. During Trump’s term that weaponization was covered up by a compliant congress, and not a single member of the oversight called it out. Now, Term-3 Obama steps back in to continue the cover up and continue the weaponization.
Hopefully, you can now see the scale of the problem that surrounds us with specific citation for what has taken place. What I just explained to you above is not conspiracy theory, it is admitted fact that anyone can look upon. Yet….
Have you seen this mentioned anywhere? Have you seen this called out by anyone in Congress? Have you seen anyone in media (ally or adversary) call this out? Have you seen any member of the Judicial Branch stand up and say wait, what is taking place is not okay? Have you seen a single candidate for elected office point this out? Have you seen anyone advising a candidate point this out?
This is our current status. It is not deniable. The truth exists regardless of our comfort.
Not a single person in power will say openly what has taken place. They are scared of the Fourth Branch. The evidence of what has taken place is right there in front of our face. The words, actions and activities of those who participated in this process are not deniable.
There are only two members of the Gang of Eight who have existed in place from January 2007 (the real beginning of Obama’s term, two years before he took office when the Congress flipped). Only two members of the G08 have been consistently in place from January of 2007 to right now, today. All the others came and went, but two members of the Gang of Eight have been part of that failed and collapsed oversight throughout the past 15 years, Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell.
♦ TECHNOLOGY – On a global scale – the modern intelligence gathering networks are now dependent on data collection to execute their intelligence missions. In the digital age nations have been executing various methods to gather that data. Digital surveillance has replaced other methods of interception. Those surveillance efforts have resulted in a coalescing of regional data networks based on historic multi-national relationships.
We have a recent frame of reference for the “U.S. data collection network” within the NSA. Through the allied process the Five Eyes nations all rely on the NSA surveillance database (U.K, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and U.S.) The NSA database provides the digital baseline for intelligence operations in defense of our allies. The portals into the NSA database are essentially an assembly of allies in like-minded ideological connection to the United States.
Unfortunately, there have been some revelations about the NSA database being used to monitor our allies, like in the example of Germany and surveillance on Angela Merkel’s phone. As long as “the good guys” are operating honorably, allies of the United States can feel confident about having protection from the NSA surveillance of global digital data. We warn our friends if we detect something dangerous etc.
The U.S. has nodes on communication pipelines to intercept and extract data. We have also launched hundreds, perhaps thousands, of satellites to conduct surveillance and gather up data. All of this data is fed into the NSA database where it is monitored (presumably) as a national security mechanism, and in defense of our allies.
However, what about data collection or data networks that are outside the NSA database? What do our enemies do? The NSA database is just one intelligence operation of digital surveillance amid the entire world, and we do not allow access by adversaries we are monitoring. So what do they do? What do our allies do who might not trust the United States due to past inconsistencies, ie. the Middle East?
The answers to those questions highlight other data collection networks. So a brief review of the major players is needed.
♦ CHINA – China operates their own database. They, like the NSA, scoop up data for their system. Like us, China launches satellites and deploys other electronic data collection methods to download into their database. This is why the issues of electronic devices manufactured in China becomes problematic. Part of the Chinese data collection system involves the use of spyware, hacking and extraction.
Issues with Chinese communication company Huawei take on an added dimension when you consider the goal of the Chinese government to conduct surveillance and assemble a network of data to compete with the United States via the NSA. Other Chinese methods of surveillance and data-collection are less subversive, as in the examples of TicTok and WeChat. These are Chinese social media companies that are scraping data just like the NSA scrapes data from Facebook, Twitter and other Silicon Valley tech companies. [ Remember, the Intelligence Branch is a public-private partnership. ]
♦ RUSSIA – It is very likely that Russia operates their own database. We know Russia launches satellites, just like China and the USA, for the same purposes. Russia is also very proficient at hacking into other databases and extracting information to store and utilize in their own network. The difference between the U.S., China and Russia is likely that Russia spends more time on the hacking aspect because they do not generate actual technology systems as rapidly as the U.S. and China.
The most recent database creation is an outcome of an ally having to take action because they cannot rely on the ideology of the United States remaining consistent, as the administrations ping-pong based on ideology.
♦ SAUDI ARABIA – Yes, in 2016 we discovered that Saudi Arabia was now operating their own intelligence data-gathering operation. It would make sense, given the nature of the Middle East and the constant fluctuations in political support from the United States. It is a lesson the allied Arab community and Gulf Cooperation Council learned quickly when President Obama went to Cairo in 2009 and launched the Islamist Spring (Arab Spring) upon them.
I have no doubt the creation of the Saudi intelligence network was specifically because the Obama administration started supporting radical Islamists within the Muslim Brotherhood, and threw fuel on the fires of extremism all over the Arab world.
Think about it., What would you do if you were Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Jordan, Oman or Yemen and you knew the United States could just trigger an internal uprising of al-Qaeda, ISIS and the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood to seek your destruction?
Without a doubt, those urgent lessons from 2009, 2010, 2011 triggered the formation of the Arab Intelligence Network as a network to defend itself with consistency. They assembled the network and activated it in 2017 as pictured above.
♦ Israel – Along a similar outlook to the Arab network, no doubt Israel operates an independent data collection system as a method of protecting itself from ever-changing U.S. politics amid a region that is extremely hostile to its very existence. Like the others, Israel launches proprietary satellites, and we can be sure they use covert methods to gather electronic data just like the U.S. and China.
As we have recently seen in the Pegasus story, Israel creates spyware programs that are able to track and monitor cell phone communications of targets. The spyware would not work unless Israel had access to some network where the phone meta-data was actually stored. So yeah, it makes sense for Israel to operate an independent intelligence database.
♦ Summary: As we understand the United States Intelligence Branch of government as the superseding entity that controls the internal politics of our nation, we also must consider that multiple nations have the same issue. There are major intelligence networks around the world beside the NSA “Five-Eyes” database. China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Israel all operate proprietary databases deploying the same tools and techniques for assembly.
The geopolitical conflict that has always existed has now shifted into a digital battle-space. The Intelligence Agencies from these regions are now operating as the backbone of the government that uses them, and has become dependent on them. [<- Reread that].
Once you accept the digital-era intelligence apparatus of China, Russia, Saudi-Arabia, The United States and Israel, are now the primary national security mechanisms for stabilization of government; then you accept the importance of those intelligence operations.
Once you understand how foundational those modern intelligence operations have become for the stability and continuity of those governments…… then you begin to understand just how the United States intelligence community became more important than the government that created it.
♦ Public Private Partnership – The modern Fourth Branch of Government is only possible because of a Public-Private partnership with the intelligence apparatus. You do not have to take my word for it, the partnership is so brazen they have made public admissions.
The biggest names in Big Tech announced in June their partnership with the Five Eyes intelligence network, ultimately controlled by the NSA, to: (1) monitor all activity in their platforms; (2) identify extremist content; (3) look for expressions of Domestic Violent Extremism (DVE); and then, (4) put the content details into a database where the Five Eyes intelligence agencies (U.K., U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand) can access it.
Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft are all partnering with the intelligence apparatus. It might be difficult to fathom how openly they admit this, but they do. Look at this sentence in the press release (emphasis mine):
[…] “The Group will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.”
Think about that sentence structure very carefully. They are “adding to” the preexisting list…. admitting the group (aka Big Tech) already have access to the the intelligence-sharing database… and also admitting there is a preexisting list created by the Five Eyes consortium.
Obviously, who and what is defined as “extremist content” will be determined by the Big Tech insiders themselves. This provides a gateway, another plausible deniability aspect, to cover the Intelligence Branch from any oversight.
When the Intelligence Branch within government wants to conduct surveillance and monitor American citizens, they run up against problems due to the Constitution of the United States. They get around those legal limitations by sub-contracting the intelligence gathering, the actual data-mining, and allowing outside parties (contractors) to have access to the central database.
The government cannot conduct electronic searches (4th amendment issue) without a warrant; however, private individuals can search and report back as long as they have access. What is being admitted is exactly that preexisting partnership. The difference is that Big Tech will flag the content from within their platforms, and now a secondary database filled with the extracted information will be provided openly for the Intelligence Branch to exploit.
The volume of metadata captured by the NSA has always been a problem because of the filters needed to make the targeting useful. There is a lot of noise in collecting all data that makes the parts you really want to identify more difficult to capture. This new admission puts a new massive filtration system in the metadata that circumvents any privacy protections for individuals.
Previously, the Intelligence Branch worked around the constitutional and unlawful search issue by using resources that were not in the United States. A domestic U.S. agency, working on behalf of the U.S. government, cannot listen on your calls without a warrant. However, if the U.S. agency sub-contracts to say a Canadian group, or foreign ally, the privacy invasion is no longer legally restricted by U.S. law.
What was announced in June 2021 is an alarming admission of a prior relationship along with open intent to define their domestic political opposition as extremists.
July 26 (Reuters) – A counterterrorism organization formed by some of the biggest U.S. tech companies including Facebook (FB.O) and Microsoft (MSFT.O) is significantly expanding the types of extremist content shared between firms in a key database, aiming to crack down on material from white supremacists and far-right militias, the group told Reuters.
Until now, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism’s (GIFCT) database has focused on videos and images from terrorist groups on a United Nations list and so has largely consisted of content from Islamist extremist organizations such as Islamic State, al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Over the next few months, the group will add attacker manifestos – often shared by sympathizers after white supremacist violence – and other publications and links flagged by U.N. initiative Tech Against Terrorism. It will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes, adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.
The firms, which include Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) YouTube, share “hashes,” unique numerical representations of original pieces of content that have been removed from their services. Other platforms use these to identify the same content on their own sites in order to review or remove it. (read more)
The influence of the Intelligence Branch now reaches into our lives, our personal lives. In the decades before 9/11/01 the intelligence apparatus intersected with government, influenced government, and undoubtedly controlled many institutions with it. The legislative oversight function was weak and growing weaker, but it still existed and could have been used to keep the IC in check. However, after the events of 9/11/01, the short-sighted legislative reactions opened the door to allow the surveillance state to weaponize.
After the Patriot Act was triggered, not coincidentally only six weeks after 9/11, a slow and dangerous fuse was lit that ends with the intelligence apparatus being granted a massive amount of power. The problem with assembled power is always what happens when a Machiavellian network takes control over that power and begins the process to weaponize the tools for their own malicious benefit. That is exactly what the installation of Barack Obama was all about.
The Obama network took pre-assembled intelligence weapons we should never have allowed to be created, and turned those weapons into tools for his radical and fundamental change. The target was the essential fabric of our nation. Ultimately, this corrupt political process gave power to create the Fourth Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. From that perspective the fundamental change was successful.
♦ WHAT NOW? There is a way to stop and deconstruct the Intelligence Branch, but it requires some outside-the-box thinking and reliance on the Constitution as a tool to radically change one element within government. In the interim, we must remain focused on the three tiers that we need for success.
• Tier One is “tactical civics” at a local level. Engaged and active citizen participation at the community, city, town and hamlet level of society. This is what might be described as grassroots level, school board level; city council level; county commissioner level.
• Tier Two is “extreme federalism” at a state level. Engaged and active citizen participation through your State House and State Senate representative. This is state level assembly and action demands upon the State House, State Senate and State Governor.
• Tier Three the challenge of “federal offices” on a national level {Go Deep}. This is the part where we need President Donald Trump, and his power to confront the issues comes directly from us.
I am confident that ultimately “We The People” will win. How we can execute the solution is more challenging; in the interim, tactical civics and extreme federalism are doable right now, in this next 2024 election cycle.
Support CTH HERE
Posted inConspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, FBI, Notorious Liars, Uncategorized
Share
Advertisement
Subscribe
372 Comments
desertson
August 18, 2024 6:10 pm
FOX is pulling it all out. Their fake polls and Rove Hume and Baier scolding Trump for being mean and giving the advice with Lindsay….Sickening. They will go all out to hurt Trump for 6 days. I won’t be watching. Take your fake polls and stuff them FOX
56
Reply
john harrison
August 18, 2024 7:01 pm
Reply to desertson
Yep just heard this morning according a new poll TRUMP can’t win. Kam ala is beating him by at least 4 pts in 5 our of 7 swing states one of those is NC. He is winning in only NV, and Ga. Trump just cant stop talking bad about Kamala and if would just talk about the economy and the boarder he would have a better chance. HERE WE GO AGAIN!
13
Reply
Glee
August 18, 2024 8:41 pm
Reply to john harrison
Oh puh-lease. Another person posted the opposite….that Trump should be more Trump-like and attacking or he isn’t going to win. The biggest problem isn’t Trump not knowing how to campaign, it’s people like you still believing fake polls on fake news.
20
Reply
Kare508
August 18, 2024 9:21 pm
Reply to Glee
Agreed. The polls are very obviously fake.
At this point, a huge number of Americans – not just MAGA- no longer trust the media.
Americans recognize that the MSM (everyone – cabinet, congress, KH, all Dems) lied about Biden’s very obvious dementia for… years. They were still lying the week b4 the June debate.
I don’t think they recover from that. They are not trusted. Neither are their polls trusted.
The thing that worries me about their fake polls is that they are … creating… a reason to trust a rigged election and the installation of KH as the winner.
31
Reply
Burmashave
August 18, 2024 10:08 pm
Reply to Kare508
This ^^^^
4
Reply
August 19, 2024 10:46 am
Reply to Kare508
These polls are like a cheater ( Joe Biden) sitting in front of Americans and stating “we are going to cheat” and get away with it.
By now you’d think at least here on this site everyone would have acknowledged this and loaded their weapons. Kamala will be placed in the presidents seat, what happens after is the question.
History says nothing will happen.
We get to witness a country being destroyed, how, and why.
1
Reply
sDee
August 18, 2024 9:25 pm
Reply to Glee
Is it that they believe the polls, or are just trolling for readers here to believe the polls??
3
Reply
August 18, 2024 10:35 pm
Reply to sDee
If the latter – boy, is somebody ever at the wrong site… 
1
Reply
August 19, 2024 12:47 pm
Reply to sDee
It’s to back a coup, the polls are fantasy. Trump has our votes, has our support I don’t know how much more obvious this can get except the votes will outnumber the excepted citizens who are actually alive and registered. Maybe that will trigger a path to actually look at the fraud.
These elections are rigged, even Trump knows this, everyone sees it, it’s documented but no court, no governor, DA, prosecutor will fight it. And worse it has put all these people in seats of power who are responsible for fair elections, and the prosecution of the fraud.
1
Reply
Jeffrey Coley
August 19, 2024 8:19 am
Reply to Glee
President Trump is the one of most gifted politicians we’ve ever seen. He is, first and foremost, a salesman. And every good salesman knows you sell the sizzle, not the steak. He has an innate ability to read the mood of the country and speak to it in terms that resonate. Yes, he has a very sharp mind and excellent command of details. But a pitch that evokes a strong emotional response is more effective than wonky discussions of policy and statistics.
I think President Trump knows how to strike that perfect balance between the two.
Last edited 1 day ago by Jeffrey Coley
3
Reply
Jeffrey Coley
August 19, 2024 8:14 am
Reply to john harrison
So, what they’re telling us is President Trump is in a better position now than he was in 2016.
1
Reply
MGBSE
August 18, 2024 11:00 pm
Reply to desertson
Trump hater Paul Ryan is on the Fox Board … I had scaled back on Fox before Trump was ejected in 2016 … and 100% turned them off when Fox called Arizona for Biden – while the sun was still shining & Tens of Thousands were in line to vote !!!
Before Ryan gave the House back to Pelosi – he voted AGAINST Trumps effort to build our Border Wall – while he was building a massive brick wall around his home !!!
TURN FOX OFF AMERICA !!!
Last edited 1 day ago by MGBSE
13
Reply
Jeffrey Coley
August 19, 2024 8:12 am
Reply to desertson
Never put too much faith in polls. This far out from the election they’re mostly meaningless anyhow, so much can and will change between now and Election Day / Season. Don’t get excited with what they say, even if you like what they say. ESPECIALLY if you like what they say.
Besides which, the “Kamala momentum” is a narrative being pushed by the DNC and their sycophants in the media (i.e. propaganda). She’s more popular than Joe, but that’s like saying syphilis is more popular that AIDS.
Last edited 1 day ago by Jeffrey Coley
2
Reply
Mark W Scott
August 19, 2024 10:13 am
Reply to desertson
Fox is in the tank for the Deep State
2
Reply
Buster
August 19, 2024 5:52 pm
Reply to desertson
Hume and Rove have always been never Trumpers. I would actually say Hume hates Trump. But, there are others who actively support the former president. Greg Gutfeld could verbally flatten Hume and/or Rove and I would love to see him do just that. The polls are really fake right now. Too much response bias and over sampling of DEMS. I recommend Rich Baris, pollster himself, at The People’s Pundit Daily for accurate info on polling.
2
Reply
MikeJ
August 19, 2024 7:10 pm
Reply to desertson
If you want decent polling, then the only guy I know doing anything worthwhile is Richard Baris, The People’s Pundit. He has been pretty much spot on in his calls.
1
Reply
Sy_N_Tist
August 18, 2024 6:18 pm
Thank you, Sundance. This is what is lacking in reporting. And not just the msm.
24
Reply
Nimpcompoop
August 18, 2024 6:20 pm
So they decided to listen to a bunch of Need Grows. People that never build or make anything and live off the backs of white people. So nice…. so awfool.
5
Reply
Freedom Ring
August 18, 2024 6:34 pm
12
Reply
nimrodman
August 18, 2024 11:35 pm
Reply to Freedom Ring
nice
The Peoples Cube?
3
Reply
resolute
August 18, 2024 6:38 pm
“Why Did Barack Obama and Eric Holder Select Kamala?”
Same reason you stick a meat thermometer into a roast in the oven. They needed a convenient way to gauge the progress of their cooking. How their base reacts to a Kamala nomination tells them volumes about where their base is at. Joe was tossed early enough to get Kamala into the spotlight, yet still have enough time at the convention to do an about face if things aren’t moving along as anticipated. She just happens to be the most disposable candidate available, with enough name recognition to also come across as legitimate in the eyes of their base.
14
Reply
Glee
August 18, 2024 8:47 pm
Reply to resolute
I don’t think Obamala, the Cacklin’ Whore, will be the ultimate candidate. She’s a place holder. Although I am a skeptic with things like “prophesy,” I did listen to some prophetic claims of a man called Kim Clement, now deceased, who in 2014 said Trump would be president, long before he declared candidacy in 2015. He also said, “They will try to put a witch in the White House, but no.” So Harris fits the bill for that prophesy…especially if the Dems give her the boot.
8
Reply
Kare508
August 18, 2024 9:38 pm
Reply to Glee
IMO, KH will be the D nominee.
There’s no time for chaos at the DNC 3.5 months b4 the election… and no one is lining up to challenge her either. Also, the idiot D voters are lining up behind her like good little mindless totalitarians.
Obama/Holder wanted KH as VP …. as an insurance policy against a Biden impeachment… and that strategy worked.
Surprisingly, Obama did … not… support KH as Joe’s replacement in 2024… for several days. That tells me Obama is not the puppet master… and that he was TOLD to get-on-board w/Kamalla by the real puppet masters running the country from behind the curtain… and Obama obeyed them. Pelosi is not a puppet master either, IMO.
Both Obama and Pelosi are “foot soldiers” … in mafia terms which seems an appropriate description of what’s going on in the US Govt now. It’s quite mafia-esque.
Last edited 1 day ago by Kare508
11
Reply
nimrodman
August 18, 2024 11:38 pm
Reply to Kare508
nice assessment in your 4th paragraph
5
Reply
Jeffrey Coley
August 19, 2024 8:29 am
Reply to Kare508
Joe and his crew (son and wife) were very upset and surprised to learn he is not, in fact, the head of his party. He was furious at being forced out in a coup. Pudding brain though he is, Joe remains a proud man. In anger and vindictiveness he publicly nominated Kamala to be his successor. That was NOT the Obamaite plan; they likely intended to name their preferred replacement after a brief decent pause. You know – for appearances sake. Have to pretend Joe stepping aside was his idea, and they were taken by surprise.
Joe presented the DNC with a fait accompli. They couldn’t very well toss Joe AND his named successor one after the other. Well, they COULD – but that would be a bridge too far. Even for the lemmings in the Democrat base.
Last edited 1 day ago by Jeffrey Coley
3
Reply
Cozette
August 19, 2024 11:39 am
Reply to Kare508
Both the puppets and puppet master(s) are employees. Others hired the puppet master(s) to put on an entertaining show.
The employer(s) == in charge.
As the old saying goes, “follow the money” although those with “the money” understandably prefer to stay hidden from view in Dark Shadows. Let the hirelings be found by those who try to “follow the money” and understand who’s really in charge. Let the hirelings, if uncovered, suffer any blowback.
1
Reply
Burmashave
August 18, 2024 10:15 pm
Reply to Glee
How many times do you think the DEMs can away with switching up the ticket? So far it was Bernie in ’16 and again in 20; and now the knife Biden caper.
I think the cooked meat thermometer is going to be in the rumps of the DEM grandees.
Last edited 1 day ago by Burmashave
3
Reply
nimrodman
August 18, 2024 11:39 pm
Reply to Burmashave
as many times as they want
who’s gonna stop ’em?
9
Reply
Jeffrey Coley
August 19, 2024 8:23 am
Reply to Glee
Kamalamadingdong
1
Reply
wolvybat
August 19, 2024 9:17 am
Reply to Glee
Clement is very good. I wonder if he was referring to another witch from 8 years ago.
3
Reply
Jody
August 19, 2024 9:53 pm
Reply to wolvybat
That’s what I was thinking…
0
Reply
Jody
August 19, 2024 9:49 pm
Reply to Glee
When you said “witch” I thought Hillary
0
Reply
Jeffrey Coley
August 19, 2024 8:23 am
Reply to resolute
Don’t forget – Joe publicly nominating Kamala was NOT their plan. That was Joe’s final act of defiance after they forced him out. He presented them with a fait accompli, threw a big monkey wrench into their schemes.
3
Reply
Jody
August 19, 2024 9:57 pm
Reply to Jeffrey Coley
Kat Timpf on Greg Gutfeld posited that as a result of what they did to him, he would come out and endorse Trump – Friday the 16th episode.
0
Reply
wvvet
August 18, 2024 7:08 pm
Here’s an answer.
4
Reply
August 18, 2024 11:36 pm
Reply to wvvet
2
Reply
jimnie
August 18, 2024 7:16 pm
they picked biden too. he didn’t get the nomination on his own. clyburn had them all stand down during the primaries to give biden the win but he had to take harris as his vice president.
5
Reply
Jesus Schwarzkopf
August 18, 2024 7:23 pm
There was significant opposition to the USA PATRIOT Act when it was being debated in Congress. The act, , faced criticism from various quarters, including multiple civil liberties organizations, legislators from both the house and Senate, as well as many public figures and advocacy groups who stated plainly that muscled up surveillance authority would ultimately lead to
civil rights violations and undermining of democratic principles. So, here we are!
By the way, in what is an irony that peg the needle on the irony-meter, the three most members of Congress who spoke out against passage of the USA Patriot Act seem to have been :
TWO DEMOCRATS
- Representative Barabara Lee,
- Senator Russ Feingold
ONE REPUBLICAN
- Representative Ron Paul
BARBARA LEE?
YUP!!
4
Reply
Winston
August 18, 2024 7:43 pm
The Biden Family Lines Its Pockets | Riding the Dragon: Chapter Two (7:58)
by Peter Schweizer
3
Reply
Winston
August 18, 2024 7:44 pm
Reply to Winston
Hunter Biden Sells Out America | Riding the Dragon: Chapter Three (3:47)
by Peter Schweizer
4
Reply
Winston
August 18, 2024 7:44 pm
Reply to Winston
Biden’s Big China Deal EXPOSED | Riding the Dragon: Chapter Four (6:40)
by Peter Schweizer
3
Reply
Winston
August 18, 2024 7:45 pm
Reply to Winston
The Bidens Get in Bed with the Chinese Elite | Riding the Dragon: Chapter Five (7:23)
by Peter Schweizer
2
Reply
Winston
August 18, 2024 7:45 pm
Reply to Winston
Everything We Know about Biden’s China Corruption | Riding the Dragon: Chapter Six (5:44)
by Peter Schweizer
2
Reply
Terry Anderson
August 18, 2024 7:47 pm
Why did Obama select Harris?
The same reason they selected Biden/Harris. Two half wits do not make a whole wit. It signals to the world that the puppets are not in charge. The question is who is the Wizard behind the curtain. Walz’ past travels seals the deal for me. China
Who is helped by all these policies? It certainly is not the present population of the US. Some of you will choose banksters.
But the bankers I have dealt with like to make money no matter who is in charge. They like to make money during times of inflation or deflation. It is easier for a banker to make money when all boats are rising. The only group that gains from the chaos that is the United States is China.
9
Reply
JustaGuyNamedBob
August 18, 2024 7:47 pm
“In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats.”
.
Respectfully, no system or technology of this scope could have been created in such a short time. This surveillance apparatus was created right alongside the popularized access to Internet itself in 1993.
.
I understand that we have to somewhat innocently and coyly pretend this kind of narrative for the general public. But understand that there were large direct government contracts to create these capabilities right alongside of the broadband networks required to carry massive data and store / mange such data.
.
Here is one I worked on, the AURORA Gigabit Testbed.
.
Network topology and project milestones.
https://dsl.cis.upenn.edu/AURORA/index.html
.
Funded by DARPA = Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
.
Project White paper
https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~jms/papers/isdn5.pdf
.
None of this was or is classified and I did not want the recognition on the write up accolades.
.
2.4 GB/s concatenated broadband transport first of its kind in the world.
.
This project and its capabilities was just one step on the way toward the surveillance and opinion leading / bending capabilities that are now fully deployed domestically.
4
Reply
August 18, 2024 8:58 pm
Reply to JustaGuyNamedBob
Interesting. I kinda view that as the infrastructure for what was legally implemented for it to be used by the IC after 911.
On a side note, I’m not very technically proficient though I understand theoretical scientific and technical concepts.
Perhaps you can answer a question I’ve long held:
I’ve always believed with the installation of fiber optics that the ability of data of whatever type can not only be sent but received. For instance, if fiber optics can deliver sight and sound images to an end user, then it seems to me that the sights and sounds on the receiving party could just as well be received back to the sender provided the connection was intact.
In other words, the government has the capacity to view or listen to anyone they want if the fiber optic connection is active.
Am I correct??
1
Reply
nimrodman
August 18, 2024 11:44 pm
Reply to Black Knight
asswhy everyone puts band-aids on their laptop cams
it’s in the Snowden movie
5
Reply
Cozette
August 19, 2024 12:01 pm
Reply to nimrodman
Snowden.
A CIA operative tasked with infiltrating then damaging the CIAs new IC competitor, the military aligned NSA?
Remember Admiral Rogers, who was head of the Obama era NSA? Remember Admiral Rogers 2017 post Trump defeat of Hillary actions (that were made public)?
Snowden =/= Assange
However, its possible that by now Snowden has had a change of heart plus shift in allegiances and really is becoming a truth speaker rather continuing to be one of The Deceivers useful idiots. I certainly hope so.
1
Reply
JustaGuyNamedBob
August 20, 2024 6:05 am
Reply to Black Knight
Black Knight, the fiber-optic strands in a cable provide the possibility of near infinite bandwidth capability. But very expensive electronics must be placed to access such bandwidth. One can not simply look through the glass and hook it into computer processing and data storage systems. Images must be digitized into one (1) and zeros (1).
.
Electronics must be replaced each time more info and data capacity capability is desired. Graphs in the article linked below show the bandwidth capacity growth just since 2010.
https://www.commscope.com/blog/2021/tracking-bandwidth-consumption-start-of-the-roaring-20s/
.
Between 2010 and 2020 Fiber-Optic electronics had to be updated with two generations between that time period. Each generation of electronics upgrade requires manufactures to invest $ to make electronics access more and more bandwidth capability.
.
When people swap and upgrade phone from 3G to 4G to 5G, then electronics for fiber-optics gets swapped out to meet the new bandwidth demand too.
0
Reply
Burmashave
August 18, 2024 10:20 pm
Reply to JustaGuyNamedBob
The Patriot Act was also not cooked up and ready to serve overnight. It would not surprise me if its birthday was somewhere around 1993.
3
Reply
Jody
August 19, 2024 10:18 pm
Reply to Burmashave
And 9/11 was an opportunity to deploy…
1
Reply
Janeka
August 18, 2024 8:24 pm
The 3rd stage of the march of Communism within this country.. Lord help us.. Pray and pray hard
5
Reply
Cozette
August 19, 2024 12:06 pm
Reply to Janeka
Prayers that translate into ACTIONS; actions that allow God to work WITH and THROUGH you as you use each PRESENT God gives you.
1
Reply
Glee
August 18, 2024 8:39 pm
Not willing to invest the time to read this epic drama, but I did try to scan for the answer to the initial question…and never found it. Somebody needs to rewrite this article to it’s lowest irreducible complexities.
5
Reply
Cozette
August 19, 2024 12:18 pm
Reply to Glee
Rewrite requested that reduces complexities to its essence.
Hopefully helpful response:
After allowing God to fill your heart, do what President Trump has asked you to do over these final 78 DAYS:
HELP gather VOTERS and guard VOTES. In 78 DAYS this chance to HELP will be GONE FOREVER.
WEAR Pro Trump gear.
Learn PERSUASION/SALES basics.
DONATE to https://donaldjtrump and encourage others to DONATE.
VOLUNTEER to help an existing group or freestyle it. https://donaldjtrump.com
Be a DIGITAL SOLDIER on social media. Share Light Hearted memes online. X account @warlorddilley
2
Reply
Pinot Noir
August 18, 2024 8:45 pm
Tier III-Alexander had a simple solution to the gordian knot. Same solution for the silos. Day 2 we start on the border. Nothing about this problem set that can’t be addressed.
5
Reply
Ghost
August 18, 2024 9:04 pm
‘Deep State IC’ began with Truman, and he regretted the creation. He saw where it was going before he died, as did Ike.
As time goes on, I have less reason to revere George C. Marshall. He argued against Truman’s recognition of Israel. 
I recall as a boy, strolling through old bookstores and seeing 1940s newspapers/magazines and noted several blaring headlines, “Who Lost China?” I didn’t understand, but all these years later I’m convinced, it was George C. Marshall.
I also have revised my views on Senator Joseph McCarthy, who I was taught to hate. That started with a book called, “Blacklisted by History” by M. Stanton Evans. It came out nearly the same time as Ann Coulter’s, “Demonic“, which accurately places the birth of the Modern Left at the French Revolution when insaniacs destroyed all that was good. In both cases, I awakened to the power of media: McCarthy and Marie Antoinette were smeared in history – forever – and it worked!
We cannot let them win again, or else it will be all over. “a jack boot stomping on a human face, forever” – Orwell
6
Reply
August 18, 2024 10:14 pm
Reply to Ghost
On China during the Truman years, very close.
See Dean Acheson, primarily, and Averill Harriman in support. Both Cabinet members.
McCarthy was on to Acheson about that very thing.
French Revolution – was the beta test. Ideas formulated by Weishaupt in Bavaria inside the Lodges and implemented in France subsequently.
4
Reply
Alzaebo
August 19, 2024 9:07 am
Reply to Black Knight
China is the new Horse for the banksters to ride; the former horses, the US, and before that, the UK, are being sent to the glue factory, as was the USSR.
(The moment the USSR failed, the banksters raised up China in its place as a ready alternative, and offshoring began in earnest.
CALPERS was the first US state pension system to invest 20% of its portfolio in “Red Chips”, Chinese stocks, in 1992, and the rest of the states followed suit. The investment powerhouse Rouche-Deloitte led the way.)
By the way, this is an exact repeat of the French Revolution, when conterfeit assignats were used to buy up confiscated Church properties, which were later auctioned off for real gold which went to the banker House of the City of London.
Thus, the Catholic heart, France, of the Holy Roman Empire was broken, and the long assault to break the Christian monarchies of the Westphalian empires begun.
The Terror was not to break the peasants, it was to drive the aristocrats off their estates, abandoning them to confiscation as they fled.
Last edited 1 day ago by Alzaebo
1
Reply
Cozette
August 19, 2024 12:28 pm
Reply to Alzaebo
Who keeps saying that Xi’s China is The Enemy?
The same sources that view Trump, Putin and MbS as The Enemy?
Fwiw Soros and Davos bro Schwab have added Xi to their NWO Enemy List that already identified PDJT and Putin as Existential Threats to the NWOs schemes.
0
Reply
pinot noir
August 19, 2024 1:11 pm
Reply to Cozette
Funding Cozette. Follow the money. Goes from ccp to every ngo and politician supporting the destruction of the Republic.
0
Reply
Mimi
August 18, 2024 10:36 pm
Sundance Sir I can’t find in the article the answer to the question…why Obama and Holden chose Harris.
I struggled through the whole article but I may have missed it.
Can you please write another paragraph explaining it clearly for us?
I thought she was chosen because of election laws about the money (200+ million?) Biden/Harris campaign raised only being able to be given to the other party to the campaign?
Last edited 1 day ago by Mimi
4
Reply
Patriotic girl
August 18, 2024 10:51 pm
This revealing and tutorial article should be ‘overnighted’ to President Trump by the publisher. People who are heading up his transition team need to be aware of all of this, his sons and JD Vance need to be aware of these details, then – the ones who can be trusted in Congress need to be informed with this article. Please, please use your influence to get this word out. I’ve been praying for ‘statesmen’ to be raised up in America – those who are not afraid to speak truth and to hold treasonous people accountable.
8
Reply
nimrodman
August 18, 2024 11:48 pm
Reply to Patriotic girl
Don Jr should be on the cc list for every such article
Dad’s far too busy to keep up, but Don Jr could certainly be assigned the task, even if he hands it off to a staff of analysts to summarize into bullet points and flash cards to bring Don Jr up to speed and then Dad thru Junior’s further distillation
you gnomesayin’
5
Reply
nimrodman
August 18, 2024 11:33 pm
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
So I guess Assange has been released from prison and is — what? — back in New Zealand now?
Sundance – what’s your brief assessment of Assange at this point?
Has Assange been sufficiently cowed, threatened, etc to never, ever, ever speak on the record about what he knows?
I would reckon so
5
Reply
August 19, 2024 12:43 am
many know some of these details, but Sundance puts it all together, what we must understand if we are to save America
3
Reply
Redblooded
August 19, 2024 2:27 am
Our strength will conquer this evil no matter the cost.
And that strength comes from Almighty God.
They fear Him, hence their commitment to destroy religion.
This has never succeeded despite slaughters, holocausts, unspeakable torture.
3
Reply
Apple Not Far
August 19, 2024 5:13 am
it sure seems to me, what with the “allowed” criticism of Hoebama of not only her blatant communism, but also her pedo running mate and her public drunkenness… that there is a very visible effort to justify kicking her to the curb at the DNC.
Perhaps the last minute CA switcheroo is still in the plans? Or Lady Pantsuit?
Criticism of this nature is usually not allowed. There has to be a reason. Either another switch is in store, or the other more dark reason, it is the final knife turn in the giant humiliation ceremony that has become our society.
Pick the absolute worst, make everyone hate it, and make everyone eat it anyway.
Either option is way beyond the pale.
1
Reply
Paul B
August 19, 2024 7:48 am
My guess is endorsing Kamala was Biden’s revenge, and placed the powers that be into a corner from which they could not escape. They wanted an open convention with a semblance of democracy.
2
Reply
drip, drip
August 19, 2024 7:56 am
Harris has had four years of grooming already. She knows who is boss and what is/will be expected of her. Unpopular and not able to win dog catcher her strings are already on tight. Though a terrible president, no one will want to replace her with Walz just like no one wanted to replace Biden with her. Security from congress. Do you want a rattlesnake in your yard or a copperhead?
1
Reply
August 19, 2024 9:32 am
Sic Semper Tyrannis…..oh…and NO MERCY
0
Reply
Danimal28
August 19, 2024 9:42 am
Sundance’s wonderful work getting into the weeds should be augmented by Mike Benz’ work @MikeBenzCyber who will show you how all of this happened after WWII. “The state department is the overt wing of the CIA with the CIA being the covert…”
1
Reply
SoldiersMom
August 19, 2024 9:53 am
IMO, The fake polls are being created and will be used to justify the rigged vote totals. Unless or until we stop rigged elections in selected states, nothing can change.
1
Reply
Mark W Scott
August 19, 2024 10:12 am
You are still missing the trees for the forest. A quick survey of Whitney Webb, Patrick Byrnes, and Peter Schweizer layout all of the evidence that the USA really does not seem to want to see, or believe because it such an outrageous attack on all we were taught to believe.
Obama is no less a tool than Biden, Bush, jr, or Clinton. This cloak and dagger deep state crap goes back a long way, but LBJ’s allowed killing of JFK, and putsching out America’s most popular President Nixon and replacing him with Ford who ran the Warren Commission cemented Deep State control of the USA. Reagan’s assassination attempt while Bush, Sr. – proved that once again.
1
Reply
August 19, 2024 10:21 am
Good summary and I agree on the whole. I do think you under emphasize the role of Brennan. He had a lot to do with the creation of the creature called Obama.
And, I really do think Ole Joe boosted Kamala as the candidate over anyone else as a big middle finger to Obama.
Likely Obama will make what he can of her, but she wasn’t supposed to be the next selected resident of the White House.
Alternatively. perhaps the (managed and paid for) protests will necessitate a savior. a lightbringer from the convention floor ….
0
Reply
Mark W Scott
August 19, 2024 12:42 pm
Reply to The Gaffer
That is my point. Obama is an errand boy for Brennan.
0
Reply
Robert
August 19, 2024 11:16 am
I will settle down and actually read this entire post . Regardless when scanning through it appears to be all the usual suspects that fall in the category of DC PARASITES and not who but just which ones should hang by their treasonous necks first
0
Reply
August 19, 2024 12:32 pm
Now it explains why Mike Pompeo wanted Julian Assange dead!
2
Reply
47Yinzer
August 19, 2024 12:37 pm
1974 news story about Kamala’s Daddy:
1
Reply
tdw.375
August 19, 2024 2:51 pm
Pretty sure Sundance is Tom Clancy
0
Reply
MikeJ
August 19, 2024 7:08 pm
When you state that the IC has the say on what is classified and declassified, with no other input or oversight, I am assuming that they are either breaking the law or circumventing it, or have come up with some rule that allows it. The reason that I say breaking the law is because of Egan v. US Navy. This is pretty much the standard for classification and specifically states that the POTUS is the ultimate arbiter of this. It’s one of the reasons that President Trump didn’t illegally take classified docs to Mar a Lago, as he is the one who legally decides what is and is not classified. How is the IC getting around Egan? Ignoring it, knowing that the DOJ will not prosecute?
0
Reply
CalCon
August 19, 2024 9:09 pm
The Go8 construct was designed to allow the President authority to carry out intelligence operations and provide the most sensitive notifications to a select group within Congress.
Go8, another dinosaur that needs to meet extinction.
0
Reply
ScoutBird
August 20, 2024 7:41 am
The Doofus Reminder Link above is broken as YouTube removed the video. If anyone has it, it needs to be posted to Rumble.
0
Reply
Advertisement
Email Sign-Up
Click here for e-mail delivery!
Wines By Devin Nunes
Categories
Categories
Recent Comments
- Liz_1 on Random Video Surfaces of Assassin Thomas Crooks at Butler Rally Before Shooting
- Cozette on August 20th – 2024 Presidential Politics – Resistance Day 1310
- Clarion on August 20th – 2024 Presidential Politics – Resistance Day 1310
- Evie on Biden Says Farewell – DNC Livestream and Open Discussion Thread
- RobInPA on Biden Says Farewell – DNC Livestream and Open Discussion Thread
Recent Posts
- August 20th – 2024 Presidential Politics – Resistance Day 1310 August 20, 2024
- Tuesday August 20th – Open Thread August 20, 2024
- Biden Says Farewell – DNC Livestream and Open Discussion Thread August 19, 2024
- Random Video Surfaces of Assassin Thomas Crooks at Butler Rally Before Shooting August 19, 2024
- Campaign Manager Brian Fallon Monitoring and Recording Kamala Harris August 19, 2024
- President Trump Delivers Economy and Jobs Speech from York, Pennsylvania August 19, 2024
Historical Campfire Conversations
Historical Campfire Conversations
- The Still Hour“Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.” – Ps 46:10
Advertisement © 2024 The Conservative Treehouse
×