So why did the left (and their captured liberals) go along with all this? What are their motivations. What were the methods of communication to keep everyone in lock step?
————————–
🔍 Summary of Discussion Thread on Alleged Biden Administration Mismanagement
This thread, largely composed of critical or sarcastic comments, centers on the idea that President Joe Biden is not in control of his administration, with power concentrated in unelected advisors and his wife, Jill Biden. The conversation blends accusations of corruption, puppet governance, election fraud, and treason with references to historical events like Watergate.
🧩 Key Themes and Most Pointed Comments:
🏛️ Unelected Power & Oligarchy Concerns
An unnamed cabinet secretary allegedly stated massive economic decisions were made without consulting Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, calling the situation unprecedented.
Users imply the U.S. is being run by a shadow group or “Politburo”, not the elected President.
“So that was what we were supposed to vote for. In order to avoid an oligarchy.”
👩 Jill Biden’s Influence
Several posts suggest Jill Biden is the gatekeeper and exerts inappropriate control over presidential decisions.
“Nobody got by Joe without Jill’s permission.”
“Jill goes first.”
⚖️ Watergate vs. Today
Multiple users compare current alleged scandals to Watergate, calling for congressional hearings and claiming the scale of current events is much worse.
“What took place is corruption on a scale so big that it makes Watergate look like a walk in the park.”
“Not corruption. Treason.”
📩 2020 Election Fraud Allegations
Claims that dead people, illegal immigrants, and mail-in ballot fraud delivered Biden his votes.
“Fake mailed-in ballots… worked like a charm.”
“If you believe [Biden got 12 million more votes than Obama], I’ll sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.”
👥 Administration Legitimacy & Competence
Biden described as passive, mentally diminished, or historically incompetent.
“He was always a dim bulb.”
“Not fit to watch my dog.”
“He hid in the basement.”
🇺🇸 Border Crisis and Treason
Anger over immigration policy and border control portrayed as intentional betrayal.
“Those are the ones that should be charged with Treason, tried, convicted, and executed.”
⚖️ Tone and Sentiment
The overall tone is highly critical, mocking, and angry.
Several comments suggest or allude to violent or extreme punishments for alleged wrongdoing, reflecting strong dissatisfaction and distrust in current leadership.
Let me know if you’d like a clean printable version, or a response crafted in a professional or persuasive tone to reply to this thread.
One reply on “We All Knew Biden Was Just a Figure Head”
Based on a review of the content on NukePro.net, the site exhibits a pattern of promoting conspiracy theories and presenting information that often lacks grounding in verified facts.
Key Observations:
Promotion of Conspiracy Theories: The site discusses various conspiracy theories, including the idea that the QAnon movement was a psychological operation designed to pacify opposition, and claims about orchestrated attacks on infrastructure, such as the Baltimore bridge incident .
nukepro.net
Questioning Established Scientific Consensus: NukePro.net challenges widely accepted scientific views, particularly on topics like climate change and vaccine safety. For instance, it disputes the consensus that climate change is a significant issue and raises concerns about mRNA vaccines without providing evidence from reputable scientific sources.
Use of Unverified Sources: The site frequently references and links to other platforms known for disseminating conspiracy theories and misinformation, such as “The Mad Jewess” blog and “Daily Stormer,” which undermines the credibility of its content.
nukepro.net
+4
nukepro.net
+4
nukepro.net
+4
Lack of Credible Evidence: Many claims made on the site are not supported by credible evidence or peer-reviewed research. Instead, they rely on anecdotal accounts, speculative reasoning, and sources with questionable reliability.
Conclusion:
Given these factors, it appears that the author of NukePro.net has difficulty distinguishing between substantiated facts and conspiracy theories. The site’s content suggests a tendency to interpret events through a conspiratorial lens, often without the support of credible evidence. Therefore, readers should approach the information presented on NukePro.net with caution and seek verification from reputable sources.